Using leader affiliative humor to encourage employee knowledge sharing: The multilevel role of knowledge sharing self-efficacy and team psychological safety
Read
784
Timeswas read the article
173
Total PDF
611
Total HTML
Share statistics
array:23 [ "pii" => "S2444569X2300104X" "issn" => "2444569X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.jik.2023.100408" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "100408" "copyright" => "The Authors" "copyrightAnyo" => "2023" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 8 (2023) " "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S2444569X23001051" "issn" => "2444569X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.jik.2023.100409" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "100409" "copyright" => "The Authors" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 8 (2023) " "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "Digitalization beyond technology: Proposing an explanatory and predictive model for digital culture in organizations" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => "en" "contieneResumen" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0002" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1650 "Ancho" => 2500 "Tamanyo" => 230907 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0002" "detalle" => "Fig " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara002" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Conceptual model and hypotheses.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa, Antonio M. Moreno-Moreno, Antonio G. Leal-Millán" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio L." "apellidos" => "Leal-Rodríguez" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Carlos" "apellidos" => "Sanchís-Pedregosa" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio M." "apellidos" => "Moreno-Moreno" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Antonio G." "apellidos" => "Leal-Millán" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2444569X23001051?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/2444569X/0000000800000003/v4_202401281241/S2444569X23001051/v4_202401281241/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:17 [ "pii" => "S2444569X23000963" "issn" => "2444569X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.jik.2023.100400" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2023-07-01" "aid" => "100400" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Journal of Innovation and Knowledge 8 (2023) " "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "An IoE blockchain-based network knowledge management model for resilient disaster frameworks" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => "en" "contieneResumen" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0008" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 8" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr8.jpeg" "Alto" => 1583 "Ancho" => 3175 "Tamanyo" => 269772 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0012" "detalle" => "Fig " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara008" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The amount of energy consumption for handling the tasks in each time interval for both models.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Amir Javadpour, Farinaz Sabz AliPour, Arun Kumar Sangaiah, Weizhe Zhang, Forough Ja'far, Ashish Singh" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Amir" "apellidos" => "Javadpour" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Farinaz Sabz" "apellidos" => "AliPour" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Arun Kumar" "apellidos" => "Sangaiah" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Weizhe" "apellidos" => "Zhang" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Forough" "apellidos" => "Ja'far" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ashish" "apellidos" => "Singh" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2444569X23000963?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/2444569X/0000000800000003/v4_202401281241/S2444569X23000963/v4_202401281241/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:18 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "titulo" => "Using leader affiliative humor to encourage employee knowledge sharing: The multilevel role of knowledge sharing self-efficacy and team psychological safety" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Zhenting Xu, Jing Gong, Yiying Qu, Xiuming Sun" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Zhenting" "apellidos" => "Xu" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0001" ] ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Jing" "apellidos" => "Gong" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "gongjing@lyu.edu.cn" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0002" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0001" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Yiying" "apellidos" => "Qu" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0003" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Xiuming" "apellidos" => "Sun" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0001" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, PRChina" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0001" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "School of Business, Linyi University, Linyi 276300, PRChina" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0002" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Business School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, PR China" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0003" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0001" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0001" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 431 "Ancho" => 1667 "Tamanyo" => 51708 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0001" "detalle" => "Fig " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara001" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Theoretical model.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0001" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0004">Introduction</span><p id="para0001" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Knowledge is considered one of the most important strategic (intangible) assets for organizations in the present era of the knowledge economy (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0003">Akram et al., 2020</a>). The effectiveness of knowledge management contributes to the improvement of organization's competitiveness and organizational development (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0056">Zaim et al., 2019</a>). In the same vein, prior research highlights the vital role of employees’ motivation to participate in knowledge sharing activities in the success of knowledge management (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Kang et al., 2017</a>). <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0021">Ipe (2003)</a> defines knowledge sharing as "the act of a specific individual providing or disseminating knowledge to others within an organization". It plays a crucial role in improving innovation capability and organizational performance (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0037">Muhammed & Zaim, 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015">Ganguly et al., 2019</a>). <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0023">Jha and Varkkey (2018)</a> argue that most employees in the workplace are reluctant to share work-related knowledge due to its discretionary attribution. Serious threats are posed to organizational growth and the acquisition of competitive advantages when employees refuse to share knowledge (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0031">Lin, 2007</a>). Hence, it is imperative to explore the factors influencing employee knowledge sharing, due to the theoretical and practical significance of knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0002" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There has been substantial progress in the scholarly inquiry on the factors influencing employee knowledge sharing, such as organizational support, leadership, and goal orientation (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0042">Pereira & Mohiya, 2021</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0048">Shariq et al., 2018</a>). Notably, most researchers have investigated the impacts of different leadership styles and attribution on employee knowledge sharing since the leaders, as the agents of organizations and in charge of its limited resource, play an important role in the attitudes and behaviors of the employees (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045">Robertson & Barling, 2013</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0042">Pereira & Mohiya, 2021</a>). Therefore, the extant literature has explored the link between different leadership styles and employee knowledge sharing, and concluded that transformational leadership, ethical leadership, and servant leadership demonstrate significant effects on employee knowledge sharing, respectively (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0043">Reslan et al., 2021</a>). Similarly, prior studies have also demonstrated that leader attributions (e.g., leader competence) also exhibit important impact on employee knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0049">Swanson et al., 2020</a>). However, several researchers have pointed out that leader humor, which highlights the degree to which a leader adopts humor with individual subordinates, as a social lubricant, enhances communication between leaders and employees, thereby, improving the leader's effectiveness (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0041">Peng et al., 2020</a>) and consequently, enhancing employee knowledge sharing. Indeed, leader humor has been shown to exert a stronger impact on the employee performance and behavior (job performance and organizational citizenship behavior) compared with other types of leadership attributes and behaviors, such as consideration behaviors, extraversion, and positive leadership traits (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0029">Kong et al., 2019</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>). As a result, this study aims to empirically investigate the relationship between leader humor and employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0003" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Despite these promising findings, further discussion on several issues is necessary. First, there are only a few studies that have investigated the link between leader humor and employee knowledge sharing. For instance, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0001">Abdillah (2021)</a> found that leader humor was positively correlated with knowledge sharing. However, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035">Martin et al. (2003)</a> categorized various types of leader humor, namely, affiliative, self-defeating, aggressive, and self-enhancing humor. Both leader affiliative and aggressive humor focus on the interpersonal dimensions of humor, whereas leader self-enhancing and self-defeating humor represent self-directed humor. Meanwhile, compared with leader aggressive humor, leader affiliative humor (LAFH), denoting a positive form of humor to amuse others, contributes to the facilitation of informal communication (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0029">Kong et al., 2019</a>). Besides this, the extant literature has demonstrated that LAFH, perceived as an effective leadership tool, signals amicability and support, thus satisfying employee needs, including social, safety, and esteem needs, and strengthening information sharing among employees (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0009">Cooper, 2008</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>). <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0014">Fayyad (2020)</a> reports that leader aggressive humor negatively correlates with employee knowledge sharing. Hence, it is inevitable to distinguish the different effects of leader humor style on employee knowledge sharing. Thus, this study examines the positive effect of leader affiliative humor (LAFH) on employee knowledge sharing. Moreover, the existing literature ignores the multilevel attribution of LAFH and its multilevel effects on employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0004" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Second, little is known regarding the mechanisms through which LAFH influences employee knowledge sharing. The social information processing (SIP) theory holds that an individual's perceptions, affective reactions, and consequent behaviors are influenced by social cues provided by others such as supervisors (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). From the perspective of SIP theory, LAFH involves a leader's use of jokes or funny things to amuse others at the individual level (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035">Martin et al., 2003</a>), is helpful to not only promote effective communication but to also enhance employees’ positive beliefs, social support, and life goals, thus improving their sense of self-efficacy in knowledge sharing (namely knowledge sharing self-efficacy), and subsequently, enhancing employee knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0012">Ergün & Avcı, 2018</a>). From the perspective of SIP theory, LAFH strengthens the shared perception of psychological safety (namely team psychological safety) at the team level, by deemphasizing hierarchical differences and reducing interpersonal tensions, which in turn affects employee knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0024">Kakar, 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>). Hence, this study adopts knowledge sharing self-efficacy (KSSE) and team psychological safety as mediating roles to reveal the mechanism through which LAFH affects employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, SIP theory also points out that the information processing of employees is affected directly not only by social cues but also by task situations and job characteristics (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). As stated earlier, LAFH may shape team psychological safety. Specifically, team psychological safety is characterized by interpersonal trust and mutual respect in which individuals are comfortable being themselves, which further supports information- and knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson, 1999</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0034">Liu et al., 2015</a>). Consistent with this, high team psychological safety is able to strengthen self-efficacy in knowledge sharing, thus activating employee knowledge sharing. However, low team psychological safety is harmful to mutual trust and self-efficacy, which eventually impedes employees’ intention to share knowledge. Therefore, this study introduces team psychological safety to investigate the boundary conditions in enhancing the effect of knowledge sharing self-efficacy on employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0006" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Overall, based on SIP theory, this study frames a multilevel linear model to explore the multilevel effect of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing. Using a field study, involving 286 responses (51 teams), and the findings support the proposed hypothesis that LAFH is positively related to employee knowledge sharing. In addition to this, the study findings also support the mediating mechanisms (knowledge sharing self-efficacy and team psychological safety) linking LAFH with employee knowledge sharing, along with the moderating role of team psychological safety. By doing so, this study makes three major theoretical contributions to the extant literature. First, this study highlights the humor literature by moving beyond the multilevel attribution of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing. Additionally, this study answers the call from recent humor studies (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0029">Kong et al., 2019</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>) by providing a novel theoretical understanding regarding how subordinates interpret and react to leader humor. Second, from the lens of SIP theory, this study unveils the paths by which LAFH affects employee knowledge sharing, as well as enriches the theoretical explanation of SIP theory in the link between LAFH and employee knowledge sharing. Finally, this study also contributes to the contextual characteristics of the relationship between LAFH and employee knowledge sharing by adopting team psychological safety as a moderator.</p></span><span id="sec0002" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0005">Literature review and hypothesis development</span><span id="sec0003" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0006">Employee knowledge sharing</span><p id="para0007" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Employee knowledge sharing in the workplace reflects the dissemination of knowledge by employee to solve workplace problems, develop ideas, or improve processes in the organization (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0002">Ahmad & Karim, 2019</a>). Knowledge sharing includes not only coded information, such as production procedures but also personal knowledge that individuals have acquired in the current or previous organizations (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0042">Pereira & Mohiya, 2021</a>). It has been acknowledged that employee knowledge sharing is beneficial for the creation of new knowledge, mutual learning, and improving job performance (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050">Ullah et al., 2021</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>). Hence, owing to the significance of employee knowledge sharing, previous studies have explored the antecedents of employee knowledge sharing, finding that leadership and leaders’ attribution (e.g., transformational leadership, servant leadership, ethical leadership, and leader competence) positively correlate with employee knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0043">Reslan et al., 2021</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>).</p><p id="para0008" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">However, employee knowledge sharing is most often regarded as an extra-role behavior. Therefore, it is difficult for organizations to formally require or stipulate employees to share knowledge (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0018">Hameed et al., 2019</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>). Indeed, an unwillingness to share knowledge is more common. For instance, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al. (2018)</a> found that employees tend to view knowledge sharing negatively to avoid losing their unique status when they assume that their position in the organization depends on their knowledge. Meanwhile, leaders, as the agents of organizations, demonstrate a strong ability to impact employee knowledge sharing behavior (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0043">Reslan et al., 2021</a>). Therefore, leaders can enhance employee knowledge sharing by encouraging the beliefs and shared perceptions of employees regarding climate safety.</p></span><span id="sec0004" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0007">Leader affiliative humor and employee knowledge sharing</span><p id="para0009" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The classification described by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035">Martin et al. (2003)</a> proposes that leader humor can be categorized into leader affiliative humor (telling jokes and saying funny things to enhance a relationship with others), leader aggressive humor (putting others down in a detrimental fashion), leader self-enhancing humor (enhancing the self in a benevolent fashion), and leader self-defeating humor (saying funny things at the expense of oneself). LAFH, as an effective communication tactic, acts as a social lubricant, compared with the other three styles of leader humor, and thus can build a high-quality relationship between leaders and their followers, and subsequently affect employees’ behavior and performance (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0033">Liu et al., 2020</a>). Certainly, prior literature demonstrates that LAFH signals benevolence, and exerts a positive effect on employee voice, job satisfaction, and performance (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0033">Liu et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0044">Robert et al., 2016</a>).</p><p id="para0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SIP theory proposes that employees actively seek information and clues related to the workplace environment from the team members, to adjust their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors through the interpretation and understanding of these clues (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). LAFH also signals benevolence by telling jokes and saying funny things. Furthermore, LAFH not only contributes to reducing status differences between leaders and their subordinates (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0039">Neves & Karagonlar, 2020</a>) but also solidifies employees’ trust in their leaders (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0026">Karakowsky et al., 2020</a>). Consequently, LAFH enhances communication, which, in turn, improves the exchange of knowledge and information, ultimately enhancing knowledge sharing. Moreover, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0001">Abdillah (2021)</a> concluded that leader humor exerts a significant impact on employee knowledge sharing. Hence, this study proposes the following hypothesis:</p><p id="para0011" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hypothesis 1. LAFH is positively associated with employee knowledge sharing.</p></span><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0008">The mediating role of KSSE</span><p id="para0012" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Self-efficacy represents individuals’ evaluation regarding their own abilities and thus reflect a recognition of individuals’ abilities (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030">Latikka et al., 2019</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0006">Bandura, 1982</a>). An employee with high self-efficacy shows more willingness to perform a specific behavior as they have sufficient confidence (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0007">Barbaranelli et al., 2018</a>). Specifically, KSSE denotes a person's confidence leading to the effective sharing of information (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0051">Van Acker et al., 2014</a>). Moreover, the extant literature suggests that KSSE helps employees overcome the problems related to knowledge exchange in the workplace (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Arain et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0051">Van Acker et al., 2014</a>).</p><p id="para0013" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Based on SIP theory, LAFH, denoting a positive form of humor to amuse others, signals benevolence and support, which help employees understand which behavior is appropriate and encouraged in the workplace through the processing of these signals and cues (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0038">Naseer et al., 2020</a>). In parallel, LAFH (e.g., a leader often joking with his/her subordinates), is considered a more secure and lower-risk form of humor that reflects support and confidence (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>) and is able to promote formal or informal communication between leaders and employees (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0029">Kong et al., 2019</a>), which can increase their confidence in providing knowledge that other employees consider valuable. In addition to this, LAFH is beneficial to creating a relaxed and pleasant climate in the organization (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0028">Kim et al., 2016</a>), thereby enhancing their confidence in information sharing. Furthermore, the extant literature highlights the enhancement of employee self-efficacy induced by leader humor (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0039">Neves & Karagonlar, 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>).</p><p id="para0014" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Previous studies have confirmed that employees with high self-efficacy not only trust their own abilities but also show more willingness to accept workplace challenges (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0013">Fast et al., 2014</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040">Ozyilmaz et al., 2018</a>). As a result, employees with high KSSE are often confident in providing knowledge without encouragement. They believe that sharing their own knowledge can effectively help colleagues solve difficulties in the workplace (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0013">Fast et al., 2014</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0027">Kim & Lee, 2013</a>). Parallel to this, employees with high KSSE are not afraid of losing their competitive advantage by sharing knowledge with others. Instead, these employees believe that competitive advantages can be gained by acquiring knowledge from team members (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Arain et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0007">Barbaranelli et al., 2018</a>). For instance, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0012">Ergün and Avcı (2018)</a> argue that KSSE positively correlates with employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SIP theory advocates that leaders, as an imperative social cue, convey information and views to the team, which influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors through cognitive responses (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). In the line with this, KSSE triggered by LAFH denotes their confidence to share knowledge that is perceived as valuable by other employees in their team. Hence, this study posits that LAFH positively affects employee knowledge sharing via KSSE. Based on the argument above, the following hypothesis is proposed:</p><p id="para0016" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hypothesis 2. KSSE mediates the relationship between LAFH and employee knowledge sharing.</p></span><span id="sec0006" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0009">The mediating role of team psychological safety</span><p id="para0017" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Team psychological safety represents the common belief of team members in the interpersonal risks related to teamwork. This belief ensures that team members feel that it is safe to take calculated risks in the team (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson, 1999</a>). This indicates, for instance, that team members are confident that they will not be punished or receive retaliation for questioning current practices in the organization. Since team psychological safety possesses the team attributes, therefore, team members form the same perception of their common experience (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0047">Schulte et al., 2012</a>). Prior studies have indicated that leaders can shape team psychological safety, for instance, transformational leadership, authentic leadership, responsible leadership, and ethical leadership demonstrate a significant impact on team psychological safety, respectively (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0052">Walters & Diab, 2016</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0017">Haider et al., 2022</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0036">Men et al., 2020</a>).</p><p id="para0018" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Based on SIP theory, LAFH signals support and amicability (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0029">Kong et al., 2019</a>). This helps reduce hierarchical differences, facilitate informal communication, and strengthen mutual trust, thus creating a positive team climate, specifically, team psychological safety. Consequently, LAFH, which involves a leader's use of jokes or humorous language to amuse others and facilitate relationships (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035">Martin et al., 2003</a>), contributes to creating a relaxed and comfortable climate in the organization, thus improving the sense of closeness between the leaders and employees and enhancing the sense of psychological safety (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020">Hu et al., 2018</a>). Furthermore, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055">Yuan et al. (2022)</a> confirmed that leader humor exerts a positive impact on psychological safety.</p><p id="para0019" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Team psychological safety is a major factor contributing to the provision of a safe interpersonal climate of trust for the employees (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson, 1999</a>). Psychological safety encourages employees to put forward different suggestions, opinions, and ideas for organizational development (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson, 1999</a>). Consequently, employees are encouraged to propose different ideas related to the current tasks in the workplace without fear of being ridiculed by leaders and colleagues, thus promoting the exchange of knowledge and information. Moreover, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0024">Kakar (2018)</a> surveyed a development team of 34 software projects in China and found that team psychological safety had a positive impact on knowledge sharing. Taken together, from the perspective of SIP theory, employees, perceiving an inclusive climate through the telling of jokes or saying funny things, experience greater psychological safety (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0053">Yam et al., 2018</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0016">Gonzalez et al., 2020</a>), leading to increased knowledge sharing. Thus, the following mediating role is hypothesized:</p><p id="para0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hypothesis 3. Team psychological safety mediates the relationship between LAFH and employee knowledge sharing.</p></span><span id="sec0007" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0010">The moderating role of team psychological safety</span><p id="para0021" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SIP theory points out that the process of individual information processing is not only directly affected by the sources of social information but also by the characteristics of workplace situations (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). Team psychological safety encourages employees to put forward different suggestions and views, admit and pay attention to mistakes, accept challenging tasks, seek cooperation among employees, and advocate mutual encouragement, stimulating their internal motivation and work engagement (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson, 1999</a>). In particular, high team psychological safety encourages employees to recommend different ideas, suggestions, and exchange knowledge without concern regarding a possible adverse influence on their career development, status, and self-image (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0054">Yin et al., 2020</a>). In this situation, KSSE leads employees in the workplace to further strengthen their confidence in knowledge exchange, thus enhancing their knowledge sharing. However, in case of low team psychological safety, there are doubts and precautions among the members, and the focus of employees’ becomes the reduction of the negative influence of work errors and interpersonal risks. To avoid these adverse situations, employees reduce knowledge sharing even when the KSSE is high. As a result, the following hypothesis is proposed:</p><p id="para0022" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Hypothesis 4. Team psychological safety moderates the relationship between KSSE and employee knowledge sharing, that is the higher the team psychological safety, the stronger the positive relationship between KSSE and employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0023" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0001">Fig. 1</a> represents the theoretical model adopted in this study. From the perspective of SIP theory, this study aims to investigate the multilevel effect of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing, focusing on the mediating and moderating roles of KSSE and team psychological safety.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0001"></elsevierMultimedia></span></span><span id="sec0008" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0011">Research methodology</span><span id="sec0009" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0012">Sample and procedures</span><p id="para0024" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study used questionnaires for data acquisition. The respondents were from different enterprises, including communication, biopharmaceutical firms, medical treatment, machinery production, and other fields in Beijing, Shanghai, Qingdao, Jinan, and other regions in China. The selected variables were LAFH, team psychological safety, KSSE, and employee knowledge sharing. A two-stage method of data collection was used to reduce common method bias. The LAFH, team psychological safety, KSSE, and demographic variables (such as age, gender, and education level) were measured during the first stage of the study, undertaken between January and March 2022. The HR directors and managers of the enterprises were informed about the purpose of the study to obtain their support. Meanwhile, the researchers actively communicated with the supervisors/managers to seek their consent on the time and place of the survey. The survey respondents were approached at the appointed time to collect the research data. A total of 470 paper-based questionnaires were directly distributed to the surveyed employees, resulting in the recovery of 390 questionnaires for the first stage. The number of correctly completed questionnaires was further reduced to 375, with an effective recovery rate of 79.79%, after the exclusion of questionnaires that were not completed correctly or showed substantial data loss. The second stage of the survey lasted from March 2022 to May 2022. This stage essentially measured employee knowledge sharing and team information. The same procedures used during the first stage were used for the second stage, specifically, the distribution of 375 questionnaires to the surveyed employees. This led to the recovery of 295 questionnaires due to reasons such as the transfer of team members. The final number of included questionnaires was 286, after the exclusion of poorly completed questionnaires or those that were missing data. In summary, the final questionnaire recovery rate was 60.85%.</p><p id="para0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The demographic characteristics of the respondents showed that 50.7% of the participants were male and 49.3% were female. In addition, 46.8% of the employees were aged 26-35 years, 25.0% were aged 36-45, and 28.2% were aged over 40. Moreover, in terms of educational level, those with master's degree or above accounted for 18.6%, those with undergraduate qualifications accounted for 52.4%, and those with junior college accounted for 29.0%. Further analysis indicated that the average length of service was 4.03 years (SD = 1.89). The average time of establishment at the team level was 6.15 years (SD = 3.16). Lastly, the average team size was 5.6, with the number of team members ranging from 3 to 15.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0013">Measurement</span><p id="para0026" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Research scales from published studies were adopted. The selected studies had also been verified by follow-up studies, with high reliability and validity. In addition, a questionnaire revision team was formed, mainly including a professor, an associate professor, and two PhDs from management sciences. The scales were individually revised through the "back-translation" procedure to ensure their applicability in the Chinese context. Besides, the selected scales used a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "1 = strongly disagree" to "5 = strongly agree”.</p></span><span id="sec0011" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0014">LAFH</span><p id="para0027" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">An 8-item scale developed by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035">Martin et al. (2003)</a> was adopted to measure LAFH. A representative item of LAFH was, “My leaders often joke with his/her close colleagues or subordinates.” The reliability coefficient of LAFH was 0.837.</p></span><span id="sec0012" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0015">KSSE</span><p id="para0028" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A 3-item scale developed by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0032">Lin et al. (2009)</a> was used to estimate KSSE. A representative item of KSSE was, “I have confidence in my ability to provide knowledge that other employees in our team consider valuable.” The reliability coefficient of LAFH was 0.766.</p></span><span id="sec0013" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0016">Team psychological safety</span><p id="para0029" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A 7-item scale developed by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson (1999)</a> was used to assess team psychological safety. A representative item of team psychological safety was, “if you make mistakes in the team, you will not be opposed and ridiculed by your colleagues.” The reliability coefficient of team psychological safety was 0.879.</p></span><span id="sec0014" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0017">Employee knowledge sharing</span><p id="para0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A 5-item scale developed by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0019">Hsu et al. (2007)</a> was applied to assess employee knowledge sharing. A representative item was, “I frequently participate in knowledge sharing activities in my team.” The reliability coefficient of team psychological safety was 0.812.</p><p id="para0031" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The reliability coefficients of the above scales were higher than the recommended standard (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">α</span> > 0.7). In addition to this, previous studies considered that individual-level variables (such as educational level and gender) and team-level variables (such as time size and the average duration of team establishment) influence employee knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0037">Muhammed & Zaim, 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>). Therefore, this study incorporated the proposed variables as control variables.</p></span></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0018">Data analysis and results</span><span id="sec0016" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0019">Confirmatory factor analysis</span><p id="para0032" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">SPSS 22.0 and Mplus 7.4 software were used for statistical analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on LAFH, team psychological safety, KSSE, and employee knowledge sharing to test the construct discrimination of the understudy variables. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis were illustrated in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0001">Table 1</a>. The four-factor model and data fit (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">χ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span>=554.848, df=224, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">χ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span>/df=2.477; GFI=0.916; CFI=0.937; NFI=0.930; RMSEA=0.067) represent the most ideal and significant model in comparison with other models. This indicated that the four variables chosen in this study represent four different constructs.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0001"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0017" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0020">Common method bias</span><p id="para0033" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The anonymous surveys were based on a two-stage method of data survey. Nevertheless, it still did not fully conform to the procedures for the control of common method bias. Therefore, Harman single-factor analysis was performed to test common method bias. All items of the questionnaire were subjected to factor analysis without rotation, and the variation explained by the first principal component was found to be 22.39%, which did not account for half of the total explained variation (61.56%). Thus, this implied that there was insignificant common method bias in this study.</p></span><span id="sec0018" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0021">Team level data aggregation</span><p id="para0034" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Both LAFH and team psychological safety represented team-level variables in this study. Therefore, the degree of consistency of team members was tested to determine whether individual data could be converted into team data. Subsequently, inter-group variability (ICC) and R<span class="elsevierStyleInf">wg</span> (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0022">James et al., 1984</a>) were applied to perform aggregation tests on LAFH and team psychological safety. The statistical analysis indicated that the R<span class="elsevierStyleInf">wg</span>, ICC (1), and ICC (2) of LAFH were 0.85, 0.26, and 0.76, respectively. Meanwhile, the R<span class="elsevierStyleInf">wg</span>, ICC(1) and ICC(2) of team psychological safety were 0.91, 0.31, 0.90, respectively, which fulfilled the aggregation criteria of R<span class="elsevierStyleInf">wg</span>>0.7, ICC(1)>0.12, ICC(2)>0.7.</p></span><span id="sec0019" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0022">Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis</span><p id="para0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0002">Table 2</a> presents the descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. The correlation analysis revealed that KSSE was positively correlated with employee knowledge sharing (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span>=0.41, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01), and a positive association was observed between LAFH and team psychological safety (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span>=0.66, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01). This provides evidence supporting the further investigation of the hypotheses.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0002"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0023">Hypothesis testing</span><p id="para0036" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A hierarchical linear model (HLM 6.08) was used to measure the multilevel mediating effect of KSSE. First of all, a null model was established with employee knowledge sharing as the outcome variable. It was found that <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">χ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span>=0.41, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.001, and ICC (1) =0.27, thus, exceeding the empirical standard value of 0.12, and allowing the following multilevel linear analysis. The results are shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0003">Table 3</a>, and revealed that LAFH exhibited a significant positive effect on employee knowledge sharing (M4: <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>=0.60, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01), leading to the acceptance of Hypothesis 1. Meanwhile, LAFH demonstrated a significant positive effect on KSSE (M2:<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>=0.54, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in the influence of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing (M4:<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>=0.60, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01→M5:γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span>=0.49, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01), when LAFH and KSSE were included in the model to explain the effect on employee knowledge sharing. Moreover, the Monte Carlo method was used to evaluate the mediating effect. The mediation results suggested that the effect of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing through KSSE was 0.1715 at the team level, with a confidence interval of [0.0895, 0.2784] at the 95% level, excluding 0. Consequently, Hypothesis 2 was also accepted.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0003"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="para0037" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Similarly, the hierarchical linear model (HLM 6.08) was also used to test the multilevel mediating effect of team psychological safety (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0004">Table 4</a>). As shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0004">Table 4</a>, LAFH was found to be positively related to team psychological safety (M7:<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>=0.50, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01). Additionally, the influence of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing decreased significantly (M9:<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>=0.60, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01→M10:<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>=0.21, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01), when LAFH and team psychological safety were included in the model to explain the impact on employee knowledge sharing. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo method was used to assess the mediation effect. The results predicted that the effect of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing through team psychological safety was 0.2842 at the team level, with a confidence interval of [0.1249, 0.4623] at 95%, excluding 0. Thus, Hypothesis 3 was also accepted.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0004"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="para0038" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study constructed a multilevel linear model (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 5</a>) to determine the impact of the interaction between team psychological safety and KSSE on employee knowledge sharing from the perspective of the multilevel moderating effect of team psychological safety. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 5</a> indicates that team psychological safety positively moderated the relationship between KSSE and employee knowledge sharing (M13:<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">11</span></span>=0.12, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01). Thus, Hypothesis 4 was also supported. Moreover, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0002">Fig. 2</a> shows the interactive effect of team psychological safety and KSSE on employee knowledge sharing based on the simple slope-drawing method proposed by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0004">Aiken and West (1994)</a>. It is clear from <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0002">Fig. 2</a> that the higher the level of team psychological safety, the more positive impact of KSSE on employee knowledge sharing is significantly greater than at the lower level of team psychological safety.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0002"></elsevierMultimedia></span></span><span id="sec0021" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0024">Conclusion</span><p id="para0039" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">To sum up, this study investigated the multilevel effect of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing, with a particular focus on the role of team psychological safety and KSSE as links between the understudy variables, from the perspective of SIP theory and the extant literature. Furthermore, a sample comprising 286 respondents (51 teams) was used for data collection. The study findings put forward the following inferences:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="celist0001"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0001"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">(1)</span><p id="para0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">LAFH was found to exert a significant positive effect on employee knowledge sharing, indicating that H1 is supported. This is consistent with the findings of a study showing that LAFH was positively associated with knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0001">Abdillah, 2021</a>). Specifically, LAFH, as an effective tactic, signals benevolence, thus strengthening communication and cooperation among employees (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0033">Liu et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0044">Robert et al., 2016</a>), and subsequently promoting employee knowledge sharing.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0002"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">(2)</span><p id="para0041" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">LAFH was found to have a positive effect on employee knowledge sharing via two mediating variables, namely, team psychological safety and KSSE, thus supporting H2 and H3. In terms of SIP theory, LAFH transmits information related to support and amicability, thus further satisfying the basic needs of employees (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0039">Neves & Karagonlar, 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>). This activates employees’ self-efficacy in knowledge sharing, thereby promoting knowledge sharing among employees. Meanwhile, LAFH also reduces hierarchical differences (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>), consequently, creating a positive team climate (e.g., team safety climate), which, in turn, facilitates employee knowledge sharing.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0003"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">(3)</span><p id="para0042" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Team psychological safety was found to play a significant multilevel moderating effect on the relationship between KSSE and employee knowledge sharing; thereby, the higher the team psychological safety, the stronger the positive relationship between the aforementioned variables, supporting H4. SIP theory holds that in the workplace, employees do not operate in a vacuum, which indicates that the information processing of employees may be influenced by team climate (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). Notably, team psychological safety represents mutual trust (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0011">Edmondson, 1999</a>), which in turn, affects employees’ self-efficacy in knowledge sharing, and thus ultimately influences employee knowledge sharing.</p></li></ul></p><span id="sec0022" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0025">Theoretical implications</span><p id="para0043" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study advances the theoretical background and literature related to leader humor and knowledge sharing in multiple ways. First, the findings contribute to the literature on leader humor and knowledge sharing by shedding light on the positive consequences of LAFH on knowledge sharing. The results provide evidence that LAFH enhances employee knowledge sharing. As a result, this study not only answers call from the scholars to examine the positive effects of leader humor (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010">Cooper et al., 2018</a>; Yam et al., 2019), but also expands on the antecedents that facilitate employee knowledge sharing (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0042">Pereira & Mohiya, 2021</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0008">Bavik et al., 2018</a>). Moreover, the findings also enrich the multilevel effect of leader humor on employees’ behavior, thus adding to the literature on leader humor.</p><p id="para0044" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Second, this study showed that LAFH demonstrates a positive effect on employee knowledge sharing through team psychological safety and KSSE, from the context of SIP theory (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0046">Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978</a>). Thus, the findings contribute to the elucidation of the mechanism by which LAFH affects employee knowledge sharing and also verify and expand the theoretical explanation of SIP theory on the relationship between LAFH and employee knowledge sharing. Meanwhile, this study also integrated two different perspectives of team climate (team psychological safety) and employee cognition (KSSE) to identify the mechanism through which LAFH affects employee knowledge sharing. This is conducive to deepening the systematic understanding of the effects of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Third, studies on leadership not only explain how leaders affect employee behavior but also focus on the situational characteristics and boundary conditions of the relationship between these two variables (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0049">Swanson et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0041">Peng et al., 2020</a>). The results confirmed that team psychological safety moderated the positive relationship between KSSE and employee knowledge sharing. This not only provides information on the boundary conditions and situational characteristics of the effects of leadership (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0049">Swanson et al., 2020</a>; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0041">Peng et al., 2020</a>), but also indicates the boundary conditions of LAFH that affect employee knowledge sharing, thus enriching the situational characteristics of the relationship between the two variables.</p></span><span id="sec0023" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0026">Managerial implications</span><p id="para0046" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The results suggest that leaders should consider using affiliative humor to motivate employee knowledge sharing. For instance, organizations should design and develop training courses to enhance leader affiliative humor and encourage leaders to adjust their leadership styles for the effective use of various humorous expressions in the leadership process to improve leadership efficacy. Moreover, leaders need to change their mindset and recognize the importance of affiliative humor.</p><p id="para0047" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The results also indicate that LAFH positively affects employee knowledge sharing through KSSE (employee cognition). This indicates that the leaders’ ability to activate the KSSE of employees serves as an important condition for improved knowledge sharing. Based on this, organizational leaders should construct communication platforms and set up incentive systems to enhance the KSSE of employees. Meanwhile, organizational leaders should also strengthen cooperation with their subordinates to enhance the KSSE of employees, thereby improving employee knowledge sharing.</p><p id="para0048" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In addition, team psychological safety not only mediates the relationship between LAFH and employee knowledge sharing but also positively moderates the relationship between KSSE and employee knowledge sharing. Therefore, managers should incorporate measures to enhance team psychological safety. For instance, managers should strive to establish a communication platform tailored to the elements of sincerity, mutual trust, fairness, and equal opportunity to improve the level of cooperation between employees.</p></span><span id="sec0024" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0027">Limitations and future research directions</span><p id="para0049" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are certain limitations associated with this study. First, although this study integrated individual and team levels to build a multilevel impact of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing, it still lacked the embedding of organizational-level variables. Therefore, future research should consider building a multilevel model including the three levels of the individual, team, and organization to systematically predict the relationship between LAFH and knowledge sharing. For instance, future studies should embed different factors into the research model such as organizational values, environmental dynamics, and other important organizational factors.</p><p id="para0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Second, this study adopted two stages for the collection of data to avoid common method bias. Nevertheless, the cross-sectional characteristics of this study do not allow for causal inference between the proposed variables. Therefore, future studies based on multi-source and multi-stage data would be useful for determining the causal relationships between the proposed variables.</p><p id="para0051" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Third, this study explored the mechanism by which LAFH affects employee knowledge sharing from the perspectives of employee cognition (KSSE) and team climate (team psychological safety). However, there may be other variables involved in the influence of LAFH on employee knowledge sharing. Therefore, future research should incorporate individual-level variables (such as leader-member exchange and positive affect), together with team-level variables (such as team cohesion and team psychological capital) to enrich the theoretical framework of LAFH and employee knowledge sharing.</p></span></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="cesectitle0028">Declaration of Competing Interest</span><p id="para0052" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that there's no conflict of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:11 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres2080894" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abss0001" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1775193" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1775194" "titulo" => "JEL classifications" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0001" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0002" "titulo" => "Literature review and hypothesis development" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0003" "titulo" => "Employee knowledge sharing" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0004" "titulo" => "Leader affiliative humor and employee knowledge sharing" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "The mediating role of KSSE" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0006" "titulo" => "The mediating role of team psychological safety" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0007" "titulo" => "The moderating role of team psychological safety" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0008" "titulo" => "Research methodology" "secciones" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0009" "titulo" => "Sample and procedures" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Measurement" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0011" "titulo" => "LAFH" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0012" "titulo" => "KSSE" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0013" "titulo" => "Team psychological safety" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0014" "titulo" => "Employee knowledge sharing" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Data analysis and results" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0016" "titulo" => "Confirmatory factor analysis" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0017" "titulo" => "Common method bias" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0018" "titulo" => "Team level data aggregation" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0019" "titulo" => "Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Hypothesis testing" ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0021" "titulo" => "Conclusion" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0022" "titulo" => "Theoretical implications" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0023" "titulo" => "Managerial implications" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0024" "titulo" => "Limitations and future research directions" ] ] ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Declaration of Competing Interest" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xack724939" "titulo" => "Acknowledgment" ] 10 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2022-10-07" "fechaAceptado" => "2023-06-29" "PalabrasClave" => array:1 [ "en" => array:2 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1775193" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Employee knowledge sharing" 1 => "Leader affiliative humor" 2 => "Knowledge sharing self-efficacy" 3 => "Team psychological safety" ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "clase" => "jel" "titulo" => "JEL classifications" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1775194" "palabras" => array:2 [ 0 => "M10" 1 => "M12" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:1 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abss0001" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spara021" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The aim of this study is to investigate the multilevel effect of leader affiliative humor on knowledge sharing behavior. Based on social information processing (SIP) theory, we frame a multilevel model of the effect of leader affiliative humor on employee knowledge sharing, focusing on the multilevel role of knowledge sharing self-efficacy and team psychological safety in the relationship between leader affiliative humor and employee knowledge sharing. By taking 286 responses (51 teams) as research samples, we adopt hierarchical linear model to test the proposed hypotheses. The results show that leader affiliative humor exerts positively direct and indirect effects on employee knowledge sharing via knowledge sharing self-efficacy, and team psychological safety, respectively. Moreover, team psychological safety positively moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing self-efficacy and employee knowledge sharing. These findings advance the literature by shedding light on whether, how, and when leader affiliative humor fosters employee knowledge sharing from the lens of SIP perspectives. Moreover, for organizations, this study highlights the central role of leader affiliative humor in fostering knowledge management and thereby innovation.</p></span>" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="para0054" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Note.</span> (R) represents reverse-coded items.</p> <p id="para0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Leader Affiliative Humor</span><ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="celist0002"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0004"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">1.</span><p id="para0056" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader often jokes with his/her close colleagues or subordinates.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0005"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">2.</span><p id="para0057" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader usually doesn't laugh or joke around much with his/her close colleagues or subordinates. (R)</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0006"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">3.</span><p id="para0058" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader doesn't have to work very hard at making his/her close colleagues or subordinates laugh.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0007"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">4.</span><p id="para0059" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader rarely makes other people laugh by telling funny stories about himself. (R)</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0008"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">5.</span><p id="para0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader laugh and joke a lot with his/her close colleagues or subordinates.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0009"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">6.</span><p id="para0061" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader usually doesn't like to tell jokes or amuse people. (R)</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0010"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">7.</span><p id="para0062" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader doesn't often joke around with his/her close colleagues or subordinates. (R)</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0011"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">8.</span><p id="para0063" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">My leader usually can't think of witty things to say when he/her is with other people. (R)</p></li></ul></p> <p id="para0064" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Knowledge Sharing Self-efficacy</span><ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="celist0003"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0012"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">1.</span><p id="para0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I have confidence in my ability to provide knowledge that other employees in our team consider valuable.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0013"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">2.</span><p id="para0066" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I have the expertise, experiences, and insights needed to provide knowledge that is valuable for other members in our team.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0014"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">3.</span><p id="para0067" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I have confidence in responding or adding comments to messages or articles posted by other members in our team.</p></li></ul></p> <p id="para0068" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Team Psychological Safety</span><ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="celist0004"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">1.</span><p id="para0069" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">If you make mistakes in the team, you will not be opposed and ridiculed by your colleagues.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0016"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">2.</span><p id="para0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Members in our team are able to bring up problems and tough issues.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0017"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">3.</span><p id="para0071" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Members in our team sometimes reject others for being different. (R)</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0018"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">4.</span><p id="para0072" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is safe to take a risk in our team.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0019"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">5.</span><p id="para0073" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is difficult to ask other members of our team for help. (R)</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0020"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">6.</span><p id="para0074" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No one in our team would deliberately act in a way that undermines my efforts.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0021"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">7.</span><p id="para0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Working with members in our team, my unique skills and talents are valued and utilized.</p></li></ul></p> <p id="para0076" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Employee Knowledge Sharing</span><ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="celist0005"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0022"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">1.</span><p id="para0077" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I frequently participate in knowledge sharing activities in my team.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0023"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">2.</span><p id="para0078" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I usually spend a lot of time conducting knowledge sharing activities in my team.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0024"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">3.</span><p id="para0079" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">When participating in my team, I usually actively share my knowledge with others.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0025"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">4.</span><p id="para0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">When discussing a complicated issue, I am usually involved in the subsequent interactions.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="celistitem0026"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">5.</span><p id="para0081" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">I usually involve myself in discussions of various topics rather than specific topics.</p></li></ul></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Measure Items" "identificador" => "sec0026" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:7 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0001" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 431 "Ancho" => 1667 "Tamanyo" => 51708 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0001" "detalle" => "Fig " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara001" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Theoretical model.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0002" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 889 "Ancho" => 1667 "Tamanyo" => 63428 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0002" "detalle" => "Fig " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara002" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The interactive effect of KSSE and team psychological safety (TPS) on knowledge sharing.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0001" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0003" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spara004" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Notes:“+” denotes the combination of variables;LAFH denotes leader affiliative humor; KSSE denotes knowledge sharing self-efficacy; TPS denotes team psychological safety; EKS denotes employee knowledge sharing.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0001"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Model</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0002"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">χ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>/df</span>(df)</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0003"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">GFI</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0004"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">CFI</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0005"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">NFI</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0006"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">RMSEA</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0007"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Model 1:LAFH; KSSE; TPS; EKS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0008"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">2.477(224) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0009"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.916 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0010"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.937 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0011"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.930 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0012"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.067 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0013"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Model 2:LAFH+KSSE; TPS; EKS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0014"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">3.931(227) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0015"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.814 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0016"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.832 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0017"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.820 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0018"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.082 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0019"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Model 3:LAFH; KSSE+TPS; EKS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0020"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">3.472(227) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0021"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.825 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0022"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.843 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0023"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.839 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0024"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.080 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0025"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Model 4:LAFH+KSSE+TPS; EKS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0026"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">4.546(229) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0027"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.730 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0028"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.773 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0029"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.749 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0030"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.112 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0031"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Model 5:LAFH+KSSE+TPS+EKS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0032"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">6.256(230) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0033"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.698 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0034"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.726 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0035"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.685 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0036"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.122 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3445500.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara003" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0002" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0004" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spara006" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Notes:</p><p id="spara007" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">* <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> <  0.05 ,</p><p id="spara008" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">** <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> <  0.01</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0037"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Variable</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0038"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Mean</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0039"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">SD</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0040"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">1</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0041"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">2</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0042"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">3</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0043"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Individual level</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0044"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0045"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0046"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0047"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0048"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0049"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Gender \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0050"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">1.56 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0051"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0052"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0053"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0054"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0055"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Educational level \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0056"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">2.83 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0057"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.80 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0058"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0059"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0060"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0061"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">KSSE \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0062"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">4.24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0063"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.54 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0064"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.08 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0065"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.16 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0066"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0067"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">EKS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0068"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">3.84 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0069"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.75 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0070"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.01 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0071"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0072"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.41** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0073"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Team level</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0074"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0075"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0076"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0077"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0078"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0079"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team size \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0080"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">5.16 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0081"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">2.46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0082"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0083"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0084"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0085"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team establishment time \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0086"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">1.13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0087"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">3.24 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0088"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0089"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0090"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0091"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">LAFH \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0092"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">4.38 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0093"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.42 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0094"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0095"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0096"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0097"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">TPS \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0098"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">4.22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0099"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.38 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0100"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.09 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0101"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.08 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0102"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.66** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3445501.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Mean, standard deviation and correlation analysis.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0003" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0005" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spara010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Notes:</p><p id="spara011" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">* <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> <  0.05,</p><p id="spara012" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">** <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">σ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span> is the residual of level 1, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">τ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span> is the intercept residual of level 2</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0103"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowgroup " rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Variable</span></th><a name="en0104"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_colgroup " colspan="2" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">KSSE</span></th><a name="en0105"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_colgroup " colspan="3" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Employee knowledge sharing</span></th></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0107"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M1</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0108"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M2</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0109"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M3</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0110"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M4</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0111"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M5</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0112"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Intercept (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0113"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">4.22** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0114"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">3.26** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0115"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">4.21** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0116"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">3.82** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0117"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">3.36** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0118"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Gender \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0119"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0120"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0121"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0122"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0123"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0124"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Educational level \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0125"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.01 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0126"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.01 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0127"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0128"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0129"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0130"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team size \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0131"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0132"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0133"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0134"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0135"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0136"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team establishment time \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0137"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0138"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0139"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0140"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0141"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0142"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">LAFH (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0143"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0144"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.54** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0145"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0146"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.60** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0147"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.49** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0148"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">KSSE (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">10</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0149"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0150"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0151"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0152"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0153"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.33** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0154"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">σ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0155"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0156"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0157"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0158"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0159"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.37 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0160"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">τ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0161"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.09 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0162"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0163"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0164"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0165"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3445502.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara009" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The results of multilevel mediating effect of KSSE.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0004" "etiqueta" => "Table 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0006" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spara014" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Notes:</p><p id="spara015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">* <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> <  0.05,</p><p id="spara016" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">** <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01;<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">σ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span> is the residual of level 1, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">τ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span> is the intercept residual of level 2</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0166"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowgroup " rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Variable</span></th><a name="en0167"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_colgroup " colspan="2" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Team psychological safety</span></th><a name="en0168"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_colgroup " colspan="3" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Employee knowledge sharing</span></th></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0170"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M6</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0171"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M7</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0172"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M8</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0173"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M9</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0174"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M10</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0175"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Intercept (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0176"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">3.68** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0177"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">2.75** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0178"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">4.21** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0179"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">3.82** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0180"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">2.12** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0181"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Gender \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0182"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0183"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0184"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0185"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0186"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0187"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Educational level \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0188"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0189"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.01 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0190"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0191"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0192"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0193"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team size \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0194"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0195"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0196"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0197"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.07 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0198"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0199"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team establishment time \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0200"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0201"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0202"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0203"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0204"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.02 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0205"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">LAFH (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0206"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0207"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.50** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0208"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0209"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.60** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0210"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.21** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0211"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team psychological safety (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">02</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0212"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0213"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0214"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0215"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0216"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.56** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0217"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">σ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0218"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0219"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0220"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0221"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.39 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0222"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.36 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0223"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">τ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0224"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">0.12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0225"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.09 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0226"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0227"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0228"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.08 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3445503.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara013" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The results of multilevel mediating effect of team psychological safety.</p>" ] ] 6 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "alt0007" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spara018" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Notes:</p><p id="spara019" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">* <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> <  0.05,</p><p id="spara020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">** <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> < 0.01; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">σ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span> is the residual of level 1, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">τ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span> is the intercept residual of level 2</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0229"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowgroup " rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Variable</span></th><a name="en0230"></a><th class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_colgroup " colspan="3" align="center" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">Employee knowledge sharing</span></th></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0232"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M11</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0233"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M12</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><a name="en0234"></a><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleBold">M13</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0235"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Intercept (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0236"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">3.82** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0237"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">2.39** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0238"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">2.12** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0239"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Gender \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0240"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0241"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.03 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0242"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">-0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0243"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Educational level \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0244"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0245"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0246"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0247"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team size \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0248"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.09 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0249"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0250"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0251"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team establishment time \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0252"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.06 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0253"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.05 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0254"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.04 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0255"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">KSSE (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">10</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0256"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.33 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0257"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.27** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0258"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.18** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0259"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">Team psychological safety (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">01</span></span>) KSSE * Team psychological safety (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">γ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">11</span></span>) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0260"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0261"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.55** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0262"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.36**0.12** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0263"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">σ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0264"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.38 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0265"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0266"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><a name="en0267"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="top">τ<span class="elsevierStyleInf">00</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0268"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0269"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.08 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><a name="en0270"></a><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="top">0.10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab3445504.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spara017" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The results of multilevel moderating effect of team psychological safety.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "cebibsec1" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:56 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0001" "etiqueta" => "Abdillah, 2021" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Leader humor and knowledge sharing behavior: The role of leader-member exchange" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M.R. Abdillah" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Jurnal Manajemen" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "25" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "76" "paginaFinal" => "91" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0002" "etiqueta" => "Ahmad and Karim, 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Impacts of knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "F. Ahmad" 1 => "M. Karim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Workplace Learning" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "31" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "207" "paginaFinal" => "230" ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0003" "etiqueta" => "Akram et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "T. Akram" 1 => "S. Lei" 2 => "M.J. Haider" 3 => "S.T. Hussain" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/cea.14456" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Innovation & Knowledge" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "5" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "117" "paginaFinal" => "129" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38279775" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0004" "etiqueta" => "Aiken and West, 1994" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "L.S. Aiken" 1 => "S.G. West" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Evaluation Practice" "fecha" => "1994" "volumen" => "45" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "119" "paginaFinal" => "120" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "Arain et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Top-down knowledge hiding and innovative work behavior (IWB): A three-way moderated-mediation analysis of self-efficacy and local/foreign status" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "G.A. Arain" 1 => "Z.A. Bhatti" 2 => "I. Hameed" 3 => "Y.H. Fang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Knowledge Management" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "24" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "127" "paginaFinal" => "149" ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0006" "etiqueta" => "Bandura, 1982" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Bandura" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "American Psychologist" "fecha" => "1982" "volumen" => "37" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "122" "paginaFinal" => "147" ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0007" "etiqueta" => "Barbaranelli et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "‘Possunt, quia posse videntur’: They can because they think they can. Development and validation of the work self-efficacy scale: Evidence from two studies" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "C. Barbaranelli" 1 => "R. Fida" 2 => "M. Paciello" 3 => "C. Tramontano" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Vocational Behavior" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "106" "numero" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "249" "paginaFinal" => "269" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0008" "etiqueta" => "Bavik et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "Y.L. Bavik" 1 => "P.M. Tang" 2 => "R. Shao" 3 => "L.W. Lam" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "The Leadership Quarterly" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "29" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "322" "paginaFinal" => "332" ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0009" "etiqueta" => "Cooper, 2008" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "C. Cooper" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Human Relations" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "61" "numero" => "8" "paginaInicial" => "1087" "paginaFinal" => "1115" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "Cooper et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: Integrating three theoretical perspectives" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C.D. Cooper" 1 => "D.T. Kong" 2 => "C.D. Crossley" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Academy of Management Journal" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "61" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "769" "paginaFinal" => "796" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0011" "etiqueta" => "Edmondson, 1999" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A. Edmondson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Administrative Science Quarterly" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "44" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "350" "paginaFinal" => "383" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0012" "etiqueta" => "Ergün and Avcı, 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Knowledge sharing self-efficacy, motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "E. Ergün" 1 => "Ü. Avcı" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">ournal of Educational Technology & Society</span>" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "21" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "60" "paginaFinal" => "73" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0013" "etiqueta" => "Fast et al., 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "N.J. Fast" 1 => "E.R. Burris" 2 => "C.A. Bartel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Academy of Management Journal" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "57" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "1013" "paginaFinal" => "1034" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0014" "etiqueta" => "Fayyad, 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The role of employee trust in the relationship between leaders’ aggressive humor and knowledge sharing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "S. Fayyad" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "19" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "143" "paginaFinal" => "157" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "Ganguly et al., 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Ganguly" 1 => "A. Talukdar" 2 => "D. Chatterjee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Knowledge Management" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "23" "numero" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "1105" "paginaFinal" => "1135" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0016" "etiqueta" => "Gonzalez et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Coming home: Why veterans with disabilities withhold workplace accommodation requests" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K. Gonzalez" 1 => "C.J. Tillman" 2 => "J.J. Holmes" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Human Relations" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "73" "numero" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "1439" "paginaFinal" => "1466" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0017" "etiqueta" => "Haider et al., 2022" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The impact of responsible leadership on knowledge sharing behavior through the mediating role of person–organization fit and moderating role of higher educational institute culture" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "S.A. Haider" 1 => "A. Akbar" 2 => "S. Tehseen" 3 => "P. Poulova" 4 => "F. Jaleel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jik.2022.100265" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Innovation & Knowledge" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "7" "numero" => "4" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38279775" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0018" "etiqueta" => "Hameed et al., 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Organizational justice and knowledge sharing behavior: The role of psychological ownership and perceived organizational support" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Z. Hameed" 1 => "I.U. Khan" 2 => "Z. Sheikh" 3 => "T. Islam" 4 => "M.I. Rasheed" 5 => "R.M. Naeem" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Personnel Review" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "48" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "748" "paginaFinal" => "773" ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0019" "etiqueta" => "Hsu et al., 2007" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "M.H. Hsu" 1 => "T.L. Ju" 2 => "C.H. Yen" 3 => "C.M. Chang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "International Journal of Human-Computer Studies" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "65" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "153" "paginaFinal" => "169" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "Hu et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: How leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => "Y. Hu" 1 => "L. Zhu" 2 => "M. Zhou" 3 => "J. Li" 4 => "P. Maguire" 5 => "H. Sun" 6 => "D. Wang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Frontiers in Psychology" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "9" "paginaInicial" => "1718" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258392" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0021" "etiqueta" => "Ipe, 2003" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M. Ipe" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Human Resource Development Review" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "2" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "337" "paginaFinal" => "359" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0022" "etiqueta" => "James et al., 1984" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "L.R. James" 1 => "R.G. Demaree" 2 => "G. Wolf" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Applied Psychology" "fecha" => "1984" "volumen" => "69" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "85" "paginaFinal" => "98" ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0023" "etiqueta" => "Jha and Varkkey, 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: Evidence from the Indian R&D professionals" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.K. Jha" 1 => "B. Varkkey" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Knowledge Management" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "22" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "824" "paginaFinal" => "849" ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0024" "etiqueta" => "Kakar, 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "How do team cohesion and psychological safety impact knowledge sharing in software development projects?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "A.K. Kakar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Knowledge and Process Management" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "25" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "258" "paginaFinal" => "267" ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "Kang et al., 2017" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A psychological empowerment approach to online knowledge sharing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Y.J. Kang" 1 => "J.Y. Lee" 2 => "H.W. Kim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Computers in Human Behavior" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "74" "numero" => "9" "paginaInicial" => "175" "paginaFinal" => "187" ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0026" "etiqueta" => "Karakowsky et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Signaling trustworthiness: The effect of leader humor on feedback-seeking behavior" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "L. Karakowsky" 1 => "M. Podolsky" 2 => "A.R. Elangovan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/00224545.2019.1620161" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "The Journal of Social Psychology" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "160" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "170" "paginaFinal" => "189" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156058" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0027" "etiqueta" => "Kim and Lee, 2013" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Hospitality employee knowledge-sharing behaviors in the relationship between goal orientations and service innovative behavior" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "T.T. Kim" 1 => "G. Lee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "International Journal of Hospitality Management" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "34" "numero" => "9" "paginaInicial" => "324" "paginaFinal" => "337" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0028" "etiqueta" => "Kim et al., 2016" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Supervisor humor and employee outcomes: The role of social distance and affective trust in supervisor" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "T.Y. Kim" 1 => "D.R. Lee" 2 => "N.Y.S. Wong" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Business and Psychology" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "31" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "125" "paginaFinal" => "139" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0029" "etiqueta" => "Kong et al., 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The state of research on leader humor" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D.T. Kong" 1 => "C.D. Cooper" 2 => "J.J. Sosik" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Organizational Psychology Review" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "9" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "3" "paginaFinal" => "40" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "Latikka et al., 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Self-efficacy and acceptance of robots" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R. Latikka" 1 => "T. Turja" 2 => "A. Oksanen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Computers in Human Behavior" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "93" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "157" "paginaFinal" => "163" ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0031" "etiqueta" => "Lin, 2007" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "C.P. Lin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Business Ethics" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "70" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "411" "paginaFinal" => "428" ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0032" "etiqueta" => "Lin et al., 2009" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.J.J. Lin" 1 => "S.W. Hung" 2 => "C.J. Chen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Computers in Human Behavior" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "25" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "929" "paginaFinal" => "939" ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0033" "etiqueta" => "Liu et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Affiliative and aggressive humor in leadership and their effects on employee voice: A serial mediation model" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "F. Liu" 1 => "I.H.S. Chow" 2 => "Y. Gong" 3 => "M. Huang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Review of Managerial Science" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "14" "numero" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "1321" "paginaFinal" => "1339" ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0034" "etiqueta" => "Liu et al., 2015" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Authentic leadership and whistleblowing: Mediating roles of psychological safety and personal identification" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S.M. Liu" 1 => "J.Q. Liao" 2 => "H. Wei" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Business Ethics" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "131" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "107" "paginaFinal" => "119" ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "Martin et al., 2003" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "R.A. Martin" 1 => "P. Puhlik-Doris" 2 => "G. Larsen" 3 => "J. Gray" 4 => "K. Weir" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Research in Personality" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "37" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "48" "paginaFinal" => "75" ] ] ] ] ] ] 35 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0036" "etiqueta" => "Men et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: A moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C. Men" 1 => "P.S. Fong" 2 => "W. Huo" 3 => "J. Zhong" 4 => "R. Jia" 5 => "J. Luo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Business Ethics" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "166" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "461" "paginaFinal" => "472" ] ] ] ] ] ] 36 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0037" "etiqueta" => "Muhammed and Zaim, 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Peer knowledge sharing and organizational performance: The role of leadership support and knowledge management success" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "S. Muhammed" 1 => "H. Zaim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Knowledge Management" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "24" "numero" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "2455" "paginaFinal" => "2489" ] ] ] ] ] ] 37 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0038" "etiqueta" => "Naseer et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Understanding how leaders’ humility promotes followers’ emotions and ethical behaviors: Workplace spirituality as a mediator" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S. Naseer" 1 => "F. Syed" 2 => "S. Nauman" 3 => "T. Fatima" 4 => "I. Jameel" 5 => "N. Riaz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "The Journal of Positive Psychology" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "15" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "407" "paginaFinal" => "419" ] ] ] ] ] ] 38 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0039" "etiqueta" => "Neves and Karagonlar, 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Does leader humor style matter and to whom?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Neves" 1 => "G. Karagonlar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Managerial Psychology" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "35" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "115" "paginaFinal" => "128" ] ] ] ] ] ] 39 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "Ozyilmaz et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory-based examination" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Ozyilmaz" 1 => "B. Erdogan" 2 => "A. Karaeminogullari" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "91" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "181" "paginaFinal" => "204" ] ] ] ] ] ] 40 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0041" "etiqueta" => "Peng et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "How can leader humor enhance subordinates’ service creativity? The moderator of subordinates’ SFIT and the mediator of role modeling" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "L. Peng" 1 => "S. Lei" 2 => "Y. Guo" 3 => "F. Qiu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/s12889-024-17736-2" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Leadership & Organization Development Journal" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "41" "numero" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "865" "paginaFinal" => "882" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38279079" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 41 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0042" "etiqueta" => "Pereira and Mohiya, 2021" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "V. Pereira" 1 => "M. Mohiya" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Business Research" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "129" "numero" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "368" "paginaFinal" => "381" ] ] ] ] ] ] 42 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0043" "etiqueta" => "Reslan et al., 2021" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The effect of servant leadership on innovative work behavior and employee knowledge sharing in the Latvian ICT sector" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F.Y.B. Reslan" 1 => "Z. Garanti" 2 => "O.L. Emeagwali" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Baltic Journal of Management" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "16" "numero" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "729" "paginaFinal" => "744" ] ] ] ] ] ] 43 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0044" "etiqueta" => "Robert et al., 2016" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The impact of leader humor on subordinate job satisfaction: The crucial role of leader–subordinate relationship quality" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Robert" 1 => "T.C. Dunne" 2 => "J. Iun" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1515/jpm-2023-0410" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Group & Organization Management" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "41" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "375" "paginaFinal" => "406" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38281095" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 44 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "Robertson and Barling, 2013" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.L. Robertson" 1 => "J. Barling" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Organizational Behavior" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "34" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "176" "paginaFinal" => "194" ] ] ] ] ] ] 45 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0046" "etiqueta" => "Salancik and Pfeffer, 1978" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "G.R. Salancik" 1 => "J. Pfeffer" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Administrative Science Quarterly" "fecha" => "1978" "volumen" => "23" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "224" "paginaFinal" => "253" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10307892" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 46 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0047" "etiqueta" => "Schulte et al., 2012" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Schulte" 1 => "N.A. Cohen" 2 => "K.J. Klein" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Organization Science" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "23" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "564" "paginaFinal" => "581" ] ] ] ] ] ] 47 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0048" "etiqueta" => "Shariq et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Mediating and moderating impact of goal orientation and emotional intelligence on the relationship of knowledge oriented leadership and knowledge sharing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S.M. Shariq" 1 => "U. Mukhtar" 2 => "S. Anwar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Knowledge Management" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "23" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "332" "paginaFinal" => "350" ] ] ] ] ] ] 48 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0049" "etiqueta" => "Swanson et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The effect of leader competencies on knowledge sharing and job performance: Social capital theory" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "E. Swanson" 1 => "S. Kim" 2 => "S.M. Lee" 3 => "J.J. Yang" 4 => "Y.K. Lee" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "42" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "88" "paginaFinal" => "96" ] ] ] ] ] ] 49 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "Ullah et al., 2021" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The mediating role of employee creativity between knowledge sharing and innovative performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing firms in emerging markets" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Y. Ullah" 1 => "H. Ullah" 2 => "S. Jan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Management Research Review" "fecha" => "2021" "volumen" => "45" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "86" "paginaFinal" => "100" ] ] ] ] ] ] 50 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0051" "etiqueta" => "Van Acker et al., 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The role of knowledge sharing self-efficacy in sharing Open Educational Resources" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "F. Van Acker" 1 => "M. Vermeulen" 2 => "K. Kreijns" 3 => "J. Lutgerink" 4 => "H. Van Buuren" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Computers in Human Behavior" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "39" "numero" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "136" "paginaFinal" => "144" ] ] ] ] ] ] 51 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0052" "etiqueta" => "Walters and Diab, 2016" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Humble leadership: Implications for psychological safety and follower engagement" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K.N. Walters" 1 => "D.L. Diab" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Leadership Studies" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "10" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "7" "paginaFinal" => "18" ] ] ] ] ] ] 52 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0053" "etiqueta" => "Yam et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: Examining costs and benefits" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "K.C. Yam" 1 => "M.S. Christian" 2 => "W. Wei" 3 => "Z. Liao" 4 => "J. Nai" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Academy of Management Journal" "fecha" => "2018" "volumen" => "61" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "348" "paginaFinal" => "369" ] ] ] ] ] ] 53 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0054" "etiqueta" => "Yin et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Transformational leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Explore the mediating roles of psychological safety and team efficacy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J. Yin" 1 => "Z. Ma" 2 => "H. Yu" 3 => "M. Jia" 4 => "G. Liao" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Knowledge Management" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "24" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "150" "paginaFinal" => "171" ] ] ] ] ] ] 54 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "Yuan et al., 2022" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Such a high cost: The positive effect of leader humor on employee incivility via psychological safety" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "Y. Yuan" 1 => "Q. Zhang" 2 => "M. Yang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3389/fmicb.2023.1304205" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Asian Business & Management" "fecha" => "2022" "volumen" => "22" "numero" => "4" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "20" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38274768" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 55 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0056" "etiqueta" => "Zaim et al., 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Relationship between knowledge management processes and performance: Critical role of knowledge utilization in organizations" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "H. Zaim" 1 => "S. Muhammed" 2 => "M. Tarim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Knowledge <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Management Research & Practice</span>" "fecha" => "2019" "volumen" => "17" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "24" "paginaFinal" => "38" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "agradecimientos" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "identificador" => "xack724939" "titulo" => "Acknowledgment" "texto" => "<p id="para0053" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The work is supported by the <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs0001">Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation</span> (Grant No. <span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs0001">ZR2020QG018</span>) and the <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs0002">Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China</span> (Grant No. <span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs0002">19YJC630134</span>, <span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs0002">21YJCZH143</span>).</p>" "vista" => "all" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/2444569X/0000000800000003/v4_202401281241/S2444569X2300104X/v4_202401281241/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => null "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/2444569X/0000000800000003/v4_202401281241/S2444569X2300104X/v4_202401281241/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S2444569X2300104X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
| Year/Month | Html | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 November | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 2024 October | 23 | 4 | 27 |
| 2024 September | 48 | 8 | 56 |
| 2024 August | 28 | 18 | 46 |
| 2024 July | 18 | 6 | 24 |
| 2024 June | 16 | 9 | 25 |
| 2024 May | 31 | 19 | 50 |
| 2024 April | 27 | 11 | 38 |
| 2024 March | 47 | 11 | 58 |
| 2024 February | 29 | 6 | 35 |
| 2024 January | 49 | 14 | 63 |
| 2023 December | 41 | 10 | 51 |
| 2023 November | 44 | 9 | 53 |
| 2023 October | 73 | 16 | 89 |
| 2023 September | 42 | 6 | 48 |
| 2023 August | 78 | 15 | 93 |
| 2023 July | 14 | 9 | 23 |
Show all