metricas
covid
Buscar en
Medicina Clínica (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Medicina Clínica (English Edition) Dexamethasone versus weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderat...
Journal Information
Vol. 160. Issue 4.
Pages 156-159 (February 2023)
Visits
54
Vol. 160. Issue 4.
Pages 156-159 (February 2023)
Brief report
Full text access
Dexamethasone versus weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia
Dexametasona frente a metilprednisolona ajustada al peso en pacientes con neumonía moderada-grave por SARS-CoV-2
Visits
54
Ismael F. Aomar-Millána,f,
Corresponding author
iaomarmillan@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Geoorgette Fatoul-del Pinoa, Úrsula Torres-Parejob, Laura Pérez Fernándezc, Silvia Martínez-Dizd, Juan Salvatierrae,f
a Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
b Departamento de Estadística, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
c Centro de Salud de la Zubia, La Zubia, Granada, Spain
d Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
e Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
f Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Abstract
Objectives

To compare the 30-day outcome (mortality and/or ICU admission) of patients admitted for moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with dexamethasone after the Recovery study versus those treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of 65 patients with moderate-severe pneumonia who received dexamethasone 6mg/day (DXM group) versus 80 treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone (MTPN group)

Results

21 (32.3%) patients in the DXM group died vs 8 (10%) in the MTPN group (p-value < 0.001) and 29 (44.6%) in the DXM group required ICU admission vs 2 (2,5%) of the MTPN group (p-value <0.001). There were no baseline differences regarding sociodemographic characteristics with a higher mean qSOFA in the MTPN group. The hazard ratio for mortality and ICU admission adjusted for age, sex, and admission CRP was 2.189 (1.082–4.426; 95% CI) and 10.589 (2.139–48.347; 95% CI) for the DXM group, respectively, vs. MTPN group.

Conclusions

Mortality and admission to the ICU were lower in patients treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone compared to those treated with dexamethasone.

Keywords:
Dexamethasone
Methylprednisolone
COVID-19
Pneumonia
SARS-CoV-2
Recovery
Resumen
Objetivos

Comparar el desenlace clínico (mortalidad y/o ingreso en UCI) a 30 días de los pacientes ingresados por neumonía moderada-grave por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con dexametasona tras el estudio Recovery frente aquellos tratados con metilprednisolona ajustada al peso.

Métodos

Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de 65 pacientes con neumonía moderada-grave que recibieron 6mg/día de dexametasona (grupo DXM) frente a 80 tratados con metilprednisolona ajustada al peso (grupo MTPN).

Resultados

Fallecieron 21 (32,3%) pacientes del grupo DXM vs 8 (10%) del grupo MTPN (p-valor<0,001) y 29 (44,6%) del grupo DXM requirieron ingreso en UCI vs 2 (2,5%) del grupo MTPN (p-valor<0,001). No hubo diferencias basales respecto a características sociodemográficas con un qSOFA medio superior en el grupo MTPN. La razón de riesgo para la mortalidad y el ingreso en UCI ajustada por edad, sexo y PCR al ingreso fue de 2,189 (1,082−4,426; IC 95%) y 10,589 (2,139−48,347; IC 95%) para el grupo DXM, respectivamente, vs grupo MTPN.

Conclusiones

La mortalidad e ingreso en UCI fue menor en pacientes tratados con metilprednisolona ajustada al peso frente a los tratados con dexametasona.

Palabras clave:
Dexametasona
Metilprednisolona
COVID-19
Neumonía
SARS-CoV-2
Recovery
Full Text
Introduction

Dexamethasone (DXM) has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with moderate/severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring oxygen therapy, which has led to its widespread use as initial treatment in most protocols.

The hyperinflammatory phase in these patients results from dysregulation of the immune response with a significant increase in acute phase reactants leading to clinical worsening, usually on the sixth to tenth day after symptom onset. Corticosteroids are adjusted to the patient's weight in the treatment of many inflammatory diseases and this was done during the early months of the pandemic. Evidence of lower mortality associated with the use of high-dose methylprednisolone (MTP) has been available since March 2020.1 After the publication of the Randomised evaluation of COVID-19 therapy (RECOVERY),2 this protocol was modified to recommend administration of fixed doses of 6mg/day of dexamethasone for ten days. Following this change, our impression in clinical practice was that in many patients this dose of dexamethasone was insufficient and led to a worse outcome. We therefore set out to analyse the 30-day clinical outcome (mortality and/or ICU admission) of the first 65 patients who received dexamethasone compared to a historical cohort who had received weight-adjusted methylprednisolone.

Methods

Between 1 and 31 December 2020 we retrospectively collected data on 65 elderly patients admitted to the Hospital Clínico de Granada with moderate/severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab PCR requiring oxygen therapy who received 6mg/day dexamethasone within the first 24h of admission in addition to standard treatment including remdesivir if criteria were met and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at therapeutic doses. They were compared with a historical cohort of patients admitted to our hospital between 15 March and 15 May 2020 treated within the first 24h of admission with weight-adjusted MTP together with standard treatment consisting of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and LMWH. Our protocol in this period included the use of weight-adjusted methylprednisolone with tapering over 15 days (1−2mg/kg/day IV of MTP for three to five days; then 40mg/day for three days, 30mg/day for three days, 20mg/day for three days and finally 10mg/day for three days).

A total of 129 patients were admitted in the first period and 91 in the second. Patients admitted directly to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were excluded from the study.

On admission, all patients had a duration from symptom onset between six and 11 days (median 7 and interquartile range 5–10 days). Comorbidities and SO2/FiO2 on admission were collected and CURB-65 and quick sepsis related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) indices were calculated. Laboratory data analysed were ferritin, CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer and procalcitonin. We analysed the extent of pneumonia based on chest X-ray or computed tomography (CT), according to the guidelines of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) classification system. The clinical outcome was compared between both groups at 30 days.

After the descriptive analysis, differences between the variables were studied. For the qualitative variables, the χ2 test was used to compare proportions. The normal distribution of the quantitative variables was analysed by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to estimate significant differences in those variables derived from independent populations that did not have a normal distribution and Student's t test to compare the means of independent populations in variables that had a normal distribution. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare paired samples from non-normal populations. Two Cox regressions were performed separately to calculate the hazard ratio for mortality and ICU admission of one group compared to another. These were corrected for age, gender and CRP at admission, adding Kaplan–Meier survival curves. The statistical software used was SPSS Version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration, obtaining the favourable opinion of the IRB/IEC of the Granada County.

Results

Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, radiographic involvement, qSOFA, CURB-65 are shown in Table 1. The laboratory data and clinical outcome are shown in Table 2.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, degree of radiological involvement and severity indices on admission.

  Dexamethasone (n=65)  Methylprednisolone (n=80)
  n (%)  n (%)  χ2 (p-value) 
Baseline characteristics
Age (> 65)  40 (61.5%)  49 (61.25%)  0.001 (0.972) 
Sex (male)  28 (43.1%)  45 (56.25%)  2.489 (0.115) 
HBP  44 (67.7%)  39 (48.75%)  5,525 (0,022*
COPD/asthma  6 (9.2%)  18 (22.50%)  4,572 (0,033*
Obesity  17 (26.2%)  33 (41.25%)  3.618 (0.057) 
Isch. heart disease  4 (6.2%)  4 (5%)  0.092 (0.762) 
Heart failure  10 (7.2%)  8 (10%)   
Diabetes  19 (29.2%)  13 (16.25%)  3.514 (0.061) 
Renal I.  10 (15.4%)  11 (13.75%)  0.077 (0.781) 
Multilobar infiltrate  50 (76.9%)  61 (76.3%)  5.391 (0.068) 
TC involvement (moderate or severe)  25 (86.2%) n = 25  28 (75.7%) n=37   
Anticoagulation  6 (16.7%)  6 /7.5%)  2.249 (0.134) 
  Min, Max, Q1, Q2, Q3  Min, Max, Q1, Q2, Q3  OR Mann-Whitney test (p value) 
CURB-65  0, 3, 1, 2, 2  0, 5, 1, 2, 2  2,382.500 (0.341) 
qSOFA  0, 7, 1, 2, 3  0, 3, 0, 0, 1  556.000 (0.000**

HBP, high blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CT, computed tomography; CURB-65, mortality prediction scale used in patients with community-acquired pneumonia; qSOFA, quick sequential organ failure assessment; Min: minimum value; Max, maximum value; Q1, first quartile; Q2, median or second quartile; Q3, third quartile, x¯, mean; Sx, standard deviation.

*

p-value < 0.05.

**

p-value < 0.01.

Table 2.

Primary outcomes, mean hospital stay and laboratory characteristics at baseline and after three days of treatment in the different treatment groups.

    Dexamethasone (n=65)  Methylprednisolone (n=80)Group comparison: dexamethasone/methylprednisolone
Primary outcomes      χ2 (p-value)
ICU admission  n (%)  29 (44.6%)  2 (2.5%)37.843 (0.000***)
Intubation  n (%)  23 (35.4%)  2 (2.5%)27.179 (0.000***)
Death  n (%)  21 (32.3%)  8 (10%)15.347 (0.000***)
      Student's t test (p-value)
Average hospital stay  x¯sx  13.029 (7.469)  14.722 (6.174)−1.230 (0.221)
Laboratory characteristics  Pre  Post  Pre  PostMann-Whitney's U test (p value) 
Ferritin Min  80.000  52.800  105.900  79.000Pre: 1,804.500 (0.002**) 
Max  4,450.000  4,500.000  3,772.000  4,332.400Post: 2,032.000 (0.034*) 
Q1  214.950  250.950  472.200  539.650 
Q2  442.900  558.550  686.200  702.550 
Q3  830.100  1,036.850  1,087.225  995.200 
Wilcoxon's Z (p-value)  −2.030 (0.042*) post>pre−2.053 (0.040*) post>pre 
D-dimer
Min  0.190  0.240  0.190  0.190Pre: 2,531.000 (0.907) 
Max  11.660  23.580  333.000  117.000Post: 2,420.500 (0.807) 
Q1  0.573  0.615  0.575  0.590 
Q2  0.910  1.315  0.865  1.255 
Q3  2.158  2.703  1.910  2.805 
Wilcoxon's Z (p-value)  −1.221 (0.222)−1.432 (0.152) 
Lymphocytes
Min  330  190  250  220Pre: 2,120.500 (0.057) 
Max  9,200  3,350  3,800  4,550Post: 2,422.000 (0.479) 
Q1  575  535  705  607,5 
Q2  800  780  940  820 
Q3  1,130  1,165  1,267,5  1,227 
Wilcoxon's Z (p-value)  −0.023 (0.932)−0.705 (0.481) 
CRP
Min  5.700  4.100  3.900  0.800Pre: 2,114.500 (0.054) 
Max  531.000  297.800  346.200  366.100Post: 1,392.500 (0.000**) 
Q1  54.300  29.200  37.025  8.350 
Q2  113.500  70.700  78.100  19.950 
Q3  177.450  124.950  143.625  68.125 
Wilcoxon’s Z (p-value)  −3.950 (0.000**) post<pre−6.737 (0.000**) post<pre 
PCT
Min  0.020    0.020  Pre: 2,500.000 (0.510) 
Max  10.800    2.030   
Q1  0.065    0.060   
Q2  0.120    0.080   
Q3  0.390    0.160   

Pre, pre-treatment; Post, post-treatment; PCT, procalcitonin; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value; Q1, first quartile; Q2, median or second quartile; Q3, third quartile; x¯, mean; Sx, standard deviation.

*

p-value < 0.05.

**

p-value < 0.01.

Twenty-one (32.3%) patients in the DXM group died vs. eight (10%) in the MTP group (p-value=0.000); 29 (44.6%) in the DXM group required ICU admission vs. two (2.5%) in the MTP group (p-value=0.000); 34 (52.3%) in the DXM group required rescue therapy for respiratory worsening vs. two (2.5%) in the MTP group. There was no association between the clinical outcome and the rescue therapy used. Of the rescued patients in the DXM group, 23 (67.6%) were discharged after 30 days and 11 (32.4%) died. The two rescued patients from the MTP group were discharged. The mean cumulative dose of MTP received by patients in the MTP group was 756mg.

Cox regression for mortality and ICU admission adjusted for treatment group, age, sex and CRP at admission gave a hazard ratio of 2.189 (1.082–4.426, 95% CI) and 10.589 (2.139–48.347, 95% CI) respectively for the DXM group over the MTP group (Fig. 1). Patients treated with dexamethasone are more than twice as likely to die and more than ten times as likely to be admitted to the ICU than those treated with MTP.

Figure 1.

Survival curves for mortality (A) and ICU admission (B) adjusted for age, sex and CRP at admission. The curves show that patients in the DXM group are 2.2 times more likely to die and more than 10 times more likely to be admitted to the ICU than those in the MTP group.

(0.18MB).
Discussion

Immunomodulatory drugs such as anakinra,3 tocilizumab,4 baricitinib,5 corticosteroids or immunoglobulins6,7 are used to control the hyperinflammatory phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Clinical trials like CoDEX8 and RECOVERY2 have shown a reduction in mortality with the use of dexamethasone. In RECOVERY, this reduction in the group of patients with oxygen therapy without invasive mechanical ventilation was 23.3% vs. 26.2%; in those with mechanical ventilation the reduction was greater (29.3% vs. 41.4%). The fact that all patients in our study met the criteria for hyperinflammation probably contributed to the higher mortality in the DXM group (32%) compared to RECOVERY (23.3%) which did not consider this aspect. The great difference observed in mortality (22%) between our historical cohort treated with methylprednisolone9 and the DXM group makes us reflect on the possible negative impact in terms of mortality due to the modification of treatment protocols after the RECOVERY trial, given that many hospitals replaced high-dose methylprednisolone with fixed-dose dexamethasone. It is interesting to note the separation of the survival curves from the sixth to the eighth day, which could be a consequence of a more effective early blockade of the cytokine storm -"window of opportunity" - in the MTPN group. Similar to the literature, the factors associated with worse prognosis in our study were age, elevated CRP and ferritin levels at admission. Although CRP at admission was higher in the DXM group, and this could explain a moderate increase in mortality, all other laboratory characteristics and SO2/FiO2 at admission were similar between the two groups. Comorbidities were evenly distributed, except for high blood pressure (HBP), which was higher in the DXM group, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which was higher in the MTP group.

Our data are consistent with a recently published study,10 in which administration of i.v. methylprednisolone for three days followed by an oral tapering regimen of prednisone for 14 days was superior to 6mg/day of dexamethasone with a 30-day survival of 92.6 vs. 63.1%.

The limitations of this study lie in its single-centre nature, its small sample size and the intrinsic characteristics of observational studies. We consider the application of the same therapeutic protocol in each time period to be a strength, especially since the MTP group's protocol included drugs with no benefit or even possible harmful effects.

In conclusion, our study suggests a worse outcome with fixed-dose 6mg/day dexamethasone compared to weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. A randomized clinical trial comparing both treatment arms would be necessary to confirm these differences.

Funding

This study has not received any funding.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
C. Wu, X. Chen, Y. Cai, J. Xia, X. Zhou, S. Xu, et al.
Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China.
JAMA Intern Med, 180 (2020), pp. 934-943
[2]
RECOVERY Collaborative Group, P. Horby, W.S. Lim, J.R. Emberson, M. Mafham, J.L. Bell, L. Linsell, et al.
Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19.
N Engl J Med., 384 (2021), pp. 693-704
[3]
E. Kyriazopoulou, G. Poulakou, H. Milionis, S. Metallidis, G. Adamis, K. Tsiakos, et al.
Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial.
Nat Med., 27 (2021), pp. 1752-1760
[4]
REMAP-CAP Investigators, A.C. Gordon, P.R. Mouncey, F. Al-Beidh, K.M. Rowan, A.D. Nichol, Y.M. Arabi, et al.
Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with Covid-19.
N Engl J Med., 384 (2021), pp. 1491-1502
[5]
V.C. Marconi, A.V. Ramanan, S. de Bono, C.E. Kartman, V. Krishnan, R. Liao, et al.
Efficacy and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalised adults with COVID-19 (COV-BARRIER): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Lancet Respir Med, 9 (2021), pp. 1407-1418
[6]
WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group, J. Sterne, S. Murthy, J.V. Diaz, A.S. Slutsky, J. Villar, et al.
Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis.
JAMA, 324 (2020), pp. 1330-1341
[7]
N. Gharebaghi, R. Nejadrahim, S.J. Mousavi, S.R. Sadat-Ebrahimi, R. Hajizadeh.
The use of intravenous immunoglobulin gamma for the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial.
BMC Infect Dis., 20 (2020), pp. 786
[8]
B.M. Tomazini, I.S. Maia, A. Cavalcanti, O. Berwanger, R.G. Rosa, V.C. Veiga, et al.
Effect of dexamethasone on days alive and ventilator-free in patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19: the CoDEX randomized clinical trial.
JAMA., 324 (2020), pp. 1307-1316
[9]
I.F. Aomar-Millán, J. Salvatierra, Ú Torres-Parejo, M. Nuñez-Nuñez, J. Hernández-Quero, F. Anguita-Santos.
Glucocorticoids alone versus tocilizumab alone or glucocorticoids plus tocilizumab in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and mild inflammation.
Med Clin (Barc)., 156 (2021), pp. 602-605
[10]
M.A. Pinzón, S. Ortiz, H. Holguín, J.F. Betancur, D. Cardona Arango, H. Laniado, et al.
Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia.
PLoS One., 16 (2021),
Copyright © 2022. Elsevier España, S.L.U.. All rights reserved
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos