covid
Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação Construindo uma escala multiitens para avaliar os fatores determinantes do uso d...
Journal Information
Vol. 12. Issue 2.
Pages 317-343 (April - June 2015)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 12. Issue 2.
Pages 317-343 (April - June 2015)
Open Access
Construindo uma escala multiitens para avaliar os fatores determinantes do uso de inovação tecnologica na educação a distância
Elaborating a Multi-Items Scale to Evaluate the Decisive Factors for the use of Technological Innovation in Distance Education
Visits
617
Edvalda Araujo Leal
Doutora em Administração pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV, Professora da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia – UFU, (Brasil)
Alberto Luiz Albertin
Doutor em Administração pela Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Professor da Fundação Getulio Vargas – FGV, (Brasil)
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
RESUMO

O objetivo deste estudo é testar estatisticamente a adequação de um modelo de escala multiitens com intuito de avaliar os fatores que determinam o uso de inovação tecnológica na Educação a Distância, na percepção dos docentes dos cursos de Administração e Ciências Contábeis. Para alcançar o objetivo deste estudo, verificaram-se, por meio de uma pesquisa na literatura, os atributos que influenciam no uso de inovação tecnológica, identificaram-se os construtos propostos por Rogers (1983) e posteriormente ampliados por Moore e Benbasat (1991), fundamentados pela Teoria da Difusão de Inovação (TDI). A amostra do estudo corresponde a 436 docentes atuantes em cursos na modalidade à distância na área de negócios. Os construtos testados são: a vantagem relativa, a compatibilidade, a facilidade de uso, a experimentação, a imagem, a demonstração de resultado, a visibilidade, o voluntarismo e o uso da inovação tecnológica (determinado, neste estudo, o Ambiente Virtual de Aprendizagem (AVA)). O teste estatístico utilizado para a validação dos construtos foi a Análise Fatorial Confirmatória (AFC). Após a purificação do modelo, os resultados apontaram que os índices de ajustes do modelo foram adequados, os resultados comprovaram a validade convergente e discriminante, e todos os construtos evidenciaram consistência e confiabilidade. Assim, o modelo de medição tornou-se apropriado, ou seja, os itens medem adequadamente os construtos propostos para avaliar os fatores que determinam o uso de inovação tecnológica na Educação a Distância.

Palavras-chave:
Inovação Tecnológica
Docentes
Educação a Distância
ABSTRACT

This study aims at testing statistically the suitability of a multi-items scale model in order to evaluate the factors that establish the use of technological innovation in Distance Education to the point of view of Business and Accounting professors. To achieve this study’s goal, thought literature research, it was checked the attributes that affects the use of technologic innovation, it also was identified the constructs proposed by Rogers (1983) and later extended by Moore and Benbasat (1991) based on the Theory of Diffusion and Innovation (TDI). The study’s sample is of 436 professors of distance learning business courses. The constructs tested are: relative advantage, compatibility, ease of use, experimentation, image, income statement, visibility, volunteering and the use of technological innovation (established, in this study, by the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)). Statistic test used to valid the constructs was the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). After purification of the model, the results showed that rates of adjustments of the model were suitable, the results confirmed the convergent and discriminative validity, and all constructs showed consistency and reliability. Thus, the measurement model has become appropriate, ie, the items measure properly the constructs proposed to evaluate the factors that determine the use of technological innovation in Distance Education.

Keywords:
Technological Innovation
Professors
Distance Education
Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERÊNCIAS
[Agarwal and Prasad, 1997]
R. Agarwal, J. Prasad.
The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technology.
Decision Science, v. 28 (1997), pp. 557-582
[Agarwal and Prasad, 2000]
R. Agarwal, J. Prasad.
A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information system professionals.
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 47 (2000), pp. 295-308
[Albertin, 2010]
L.A. Albertin.
Comércio Eletrônico: Modelo, Aspectos e Contribuições de sua Aplicação, 6 ed, Atlas, (2010),
[Bagozzi and Philips, 1982]
R.P. Bagozzi, L.W. Philips.
Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal.
Administrative Science Quarterly, v.27 (1982), pp. 459-489
[Behar, 2008]
P.A. Behar.
Modelos Pedagógicos em Educação a Distância, Artmed, (2008),
[Boghikian-Whitby and Mortagy, 2008]
S. Boghikian-Whitby, Y. Mortagy.
The effect of student background in e-learning – Longitudinal study.
Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, v.5 (2008), pp. 107-126
[Brown, 2006]
T. Brown.
Confirmatory factor analysis: for applied research, Guilford Publications, (2006),
[Carliner, 2005]
S. Carliner.
Course Management Systems Versus Learning Management Systems, American Society for Training and Development, (2005),
[Chen, 2011]
J. Chen.
The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance.
Computers & Education, v.57 (2011), pp. 1501-1511
[Cheng et al., 2011]
B. Cheng, M. Wang, S. Yang, K. Peng.
Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support.
Computers & Education, v. 57 (2011), pp. 1317-1333
[Compeau et al., 2007]
D.R. Compeau, D.B. Meister, C.A. Higgins.
From prediction to explanation: reconceptualizing and extending the perceived characteristics of innovating.
Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 8 (2007), pp. 409-439
[Davis et al., 1989]
F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, P.R. Warshaw.
User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.
Management Science, v. 35 (1989), pp. 982-1003
[Fornell and Larcker, 1981]
C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker.
Evaluating Structural Equations Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.
Journal of Marketing, v.18 (1981), pp. 39-50
[Garbarino and Johnson, 1999]
E. Garbarino, M. Johnson.
The different roles of satisfaction, trust and commitment for relational and transactional consumers.
Journal of Marketing, v.63 (1999), pp. 70-87
[Gong et al., 2004]
M. Gong, Y. Xu, Y. Yu.
An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning.
Journal of Information Systems Education, v. 15 (2004), pp. 365
[Gribbins and Hadidi, 2007]
M.L. Gribbins, R. Hadidi.
Technology-enhanced learning in blended learning environments: A report on standard practices.
The Communication of the Association of Information Systems, v., v. 20 (2007), pp. 741-759
[Gruzd et al., 2012]
A. Gruzd, K. Staves, A. Wilk.
Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model.
Computers in Human Behavior, v., v. 28 (2012), pp. 2340-2350
[Hair et al., 2009]
J.F. Hair Jr., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black.
Análise Multivariada de dados, 6.ed, Bookman, (2009),
[He et al., 2006]
Q. He, Y. Duan, Z. Fu, D. Li.
An innovation adoption study of online e-payment in Chinese companies.
Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, v. 4 (2006), pp. 48-69
[Hong et al., 2011]
J. Hong, M. Hwang, H. Hsu, W. Wong, M. Chen.
Applying the technology acceptance model in a study of the factors affecting usage of the Taiwan digital archives system.
Computers & Education, v. 57 (2011), pp. 2086-2094
[Huang et al., 2012]
A. Huang, S. Yang, S. Liaw.
A study of user’s acceptance on situacional mashups in situational language teaching.
British Journal of Education Technology, v. 43 (2012), pp. 52
[Huertas, 2007]
A. Huertas.
Teaching and learning logic in a virtual learning environment.
Oxford University Press, 15 (2007), pp. 321-333
[Ibrahim et al., 2011]
R. Ibrahim, K. Khalil, A. Jaafar.
Towards Educational Games Acceptance Model (EGAM): A Revised Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).
International Journal of Research and Reviews in Computer Science, v. 2 (2011), pp. 839-846
[Igbaria et al., 1995]
M. Igbaria, T. Guimarães, G. Davis.
Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model.
MIS Quarterly, v. 11 (1995), pp. 87-114
[Kenski, 2009]
V.M. Kenski.
Tecnologias e Ensino Presencial e a Distância, 7a ed, Papirus, (2009),
[Kline, 2005]
R.B. Kline.
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2. ed, The Guilford Press, (2005),
[Lewis et al., 2003]
W. Lewis, R. Agarwal, V. Sambamurthy.
Information Technology Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers.
MIS Quarterly, v. 27 (2003), pp. 657-678
[Lin and Jou, 2012]
Y. Lin, M. Jou.
A Web Application Supported Learning Environment for Enhancing Classroom Teaching and Learning Experiences.
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 64 (2012), pp. 1-11
[Malhotra et al., 2005]
N.K. Malhotra, I. Rocha, M.C. Laudisio, E. Altheman, F.M. Borges.
Introdução à Pesquisa de Marketing, Pearson Prentice Hall, (2005),
[Masetto, 2003]
M.T. Masetto.
Competência Pedagógica do Professor Universitário, Summus, (2003),
[Moore and Benbasat, 1991]
G.C. Moore, I. Benbasat.
Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation.
Information Systems Research, v. 2 (1991),
[Moran, 2007]
J.M. Moran.
Desafios na Comunicação Pessoal: Gerenciamento integrado da comunicação pessoal, social e tecnológica, Paulinas, (2007),
[Oliveira, 2003]
E.G. Oliveira.
Educação a distância na transição paradigmática, Papirus, (2003),
[Perez et al., 2012]
G. Perez, et al.
Tecnologia de informação para apoio ao ensino superior: o uso da ferramenta moodle por professores de Ciências Contábeis.
Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 6 (2012), pp. 144-164
[Pituch and Lee, 2006]
K.A. Pituch, Y. Lee.
The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use.
Computer & Education, v. 47 (2006), pp. 222-244
[Plouffe et al., 2001a]
C.R. Plouffe, J. Hulland, M. Vandenbosch.
Richness versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions: Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System.
Information Systems Research, v.12 (2001), pp. 208-222
[Plouffe et al., 2001b]
C.R. Plouffe, M. Vandenbosch, J. Hulland.
Intermediating technologies and multi-group adoption: A comparison of consumer and merchant adoption intentions toward a new electronic payment system.
Journal of Product Innovation Management, v.18 (2001), pp. 65-81
[Pozzebon and Petrini, 2002]
M. Pozzebon, M. Petrini.
Impactos da tecnologia da informação sobre as organizações: desvendando o Paradoxo da Produtividade.
[Robertson, 1967]
T.S. Robertson.
The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation.
Journal of Marketing, 31 (1967), pp. 14-19
[Rogers, 1983]
E.M. Rogers.
Diffusion of innovation, 3. edition, The Free Press, (1983),
[Schlemmer, 2002]
E. Schlemmer.
AVA: Um ambiente virtual de convivência interacionista sistêmico para comunidades virtuais na cultura da aprendizagem,
[Teo and Noyes, 2011]
T. Teo, J. Noyes.
An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach.
Computers & Education, v. 57 (2011), pp. 1645-1653
[Tidd et al., 2005]
J. Tidd, J. Bessant, K. Pavitt.
Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change, 3. ed, John Wiley & Sons, (2005),
[Venkatesh and Davis, 2000]
V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis.
A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.
Management Science, v. 46 (2000), pp. 186-204
[Venkatesh et al., 2003]
V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, F.D. Davis.
User acceptance of Information Technology: toward a unified view.
MIS Quarterly, v. 27 (2003), pp. 425-478
[Zabalza, 2006]
M.A. Zabalza.
Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Calidad y desarrollo profesional, Editora Narcea, (2006),
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Article options