metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Argentina de Microbiología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Argentina de Microbiología Beta-lactam antibiotics and viridans group streptococci
Journal Information
Vol. 54. Issue 4.
Pages 335-343 (October - December 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
1838
Vol. 54. Issue 4.
Pages 335-343 (October - December 2022)
Special article
Open Access
Beta-lactam antibiotics and viridans group streptococci
Antibióticos beta-lactámicos y estreptococos grupo viridans
Visits
1838
Horacio A. Lopardoa,b,
Corresponding author
hlopar25@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Laura Vigliaroloa,b, Laura Bonofiglioa,c,d, Paula Gagettia,e, Gabriela García Gabarrota,f, Sara Kaufmana,g, Marta Molleracha,c,d, Inés Toresania,h, Martha von Spechta,i,j
a Grupo STREP de la Sociedad Argentina de Bacteriología, Micología y Parasitología Clínicas (SADEBAC), División de la Asociación Argentina de Microbiología, Argentina
b Cátedra de Microbiología Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
c Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Departamento de Microbiología, Inmunología y Biotecnología, Cátedra de Microbiología, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
d CONICET, Argentina
e Servicio Antimicrobianos, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas (INEI), ANLIS «Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán», Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
f Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas (PEDECIBA), Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
g Sección Microbiología Clínica, División Laboratorio, Hospital Juan A. Fernández, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
h Cátedra de Bacteriología, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina
i Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Hospital Provincial de Pediatría «Dr. F. Barreyro», Posadas, Misiones, Argentina
j Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina
Ver más
Highlights

  • In Argentina one to two thirds of viridans group streptococci are nonsusceptible to penicillin.

  • Species of the Streptococcus mitis group are more frequently nonsusceptible to penicillin.

  • Third generation cephalosporins and carbapenems are currently more active.

  • Mortality was associated to nonsusceptibility to penicillin.

This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Abstract

The aim of this review is to present an update on the susceptibility of viridans group streptococci (VGS) to β-lactam antimicrobials, with emphasis on the Argentinean scenario. VGS are a heterogeneous group including five groups of species, each one exhibiting peculiar susceptibility patterns to penicillin (PEN). Species of the Streptococcus mitis group are frequently nonsusceptible to PEN. PEN resistance is associated with changes in PEN-binding proteins. In Argentina, one to two thirds of VGS are nonsusceptible to PEN. Third generation cephalosporins and carbapenems are currently more effective in vitro than PEN against VGS. Mortality was associated to nonsusceptibility to PEN in at least two studies involving patients with bacteremia caused by VGS. Treatment of endocarditis due to VGS should be adjusted/to the PEN susceptibility of the isolates. Vancomycin may be an alternative choice for treating endocarditis caused by PEN-resistant isolates (MIC4μg/ml).

Keywords:
Viridans group streptococci
β-Lactams
Resistance
Penicillin-binding proteins
Endocarditis
Resumen

El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar una actualización sobre la sensibilidad de los estreptococos del grupo viridans (EGV) a los antimicrobianos β-lactámicos, con énfasis en el escenario argentino. Los EGV son un grupo heterogéneo que incluye cinco grupos de especies, y cada una presenta su patrón especial de sensibilidad a la penicilina (PEN). Las especies del grupo Streptococcus mitis, con mayor frecuencia, no son sensibles a la PEN. La resistencia a la PEN se asocia con cambios de las proteínas ligadoras de PEN. En la Argentina, de uno a dos tercios de los EGV no son sensibles a la PEN. Las cefalosporinas de tercera generación y los carbapenemes son actualmente más eficaces in vitro que la PEN contra los EGV. La mortalidad se asoció con la no sensibilidad a la PEN en al menos dos estudios de pacientes con bacteriemia por EGV. El tratamiento de las endocarditis por EGV debe ajustarse según la sensibilidad a la PEN de los aislados. La vancomicina podría ser una elección alternativa para el tratamiento de las endocarditis por cepas resistentes a PEN (CIM4μg/ml).

Palabras clave:
Estreptococos del grupo viridans
β-Lactámicos
Resistencia
Proteínas ligadoras de penicilina
Endocarditis
Full Text
Introduction

Viridans group streptococci (VGS) are a heterogeneous group that includes five groups of species: Streptococcus mitis group, Streptococcus salivarius group, Streptococcus anginosus group (sometimes still referred to as “Streptococcus milleri”, which is not a validly published denomination), Streptococcus mutans group, and Streptococcus bovis group (frequently referred to as group D streptococci)23.

Despite belonging to the S. mitis group because of its molecular similarity, S. pneumoniae is usually described separately due to its distinguishing clinical and epidemiological impact, and will not be covered in the present review.

Identifying them at the species or subspecies level is very difficult using current biochemical methods, including API 20 Strep, Vitek 2, Phoenix and similar automated methods. Moreover, mass spectrometry and some sequencing methods may also misidentify some VGS species or subspecies2.

The multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), employing seven house-keeping gene sequences, has demonstrated its ability to identify VGS at the species level7. However, there are still problems to identify some species such as S. mitis and S. oralis, and also to differentiate them from S. pneumoniae due to their frequent intra- and interspecies gene transfer of mosaic genes19.

The aim of this review was to present an update of β-lactam resistance among VGS, emphasizing the Argentinean experience. It is not a systematic review but a report on information obtained from selected studies and guidelines.

Human diseases associated with viridans group streptococci

VGS are an important part of the commensal microbiota of the human oropharyngeal cavity, vagina and gastrointestinal tract. However, they are the causative microorganisms of up to 40–60% of cases of native-valve endocarditis27, and also of 16% of cases of prosthetic-valve endocarditis26. Their role in the bacteremia of neutropenic patients, especially those with hematologic malignancies, is a matter of growing concern28,31.

An association of S. bovis group with colorectal carcinoma has been largely reported since the 50s. Despite being especially related to Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus, when isolated from clinical samples, it is advisable to report S. bovis at group level in order to promote colorectal cancer screening11.

S. anginosus group is associated with different types of purulent collections, including brain, liver and pulmonary abscesses5,6. These and other associated pathologies are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

VGS Species groups and their most frequently associated pathologies.

Species group  Most frequently associated pathologies 
S. mutans  Caries, endocarditis 
S. mitis  Endocarditis, bacteremia in neutropenic patients 
S. salivarius  Transient bacteremia, endocarditis, iatrogenic meningitis, poor association with bowel malignancies 
S. bovis  Bacteremia, sepsis, endocarditis (S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus=colorectal cancer). (S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus=meningitis, urinary tract infections) 
S. anginosus  Abscess and empyema, rarely endocarditis 
Mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance in viridans group streptococci and synergy of β-lactams with aminoglycosides

The antibacterial efficacy of penicillin (PEN) against VGS depends on the affinity to bind penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and its decreased affinity leads to decreased sensitivity or resistance to PEN.

These PBPs are often called mosaic proteins because they are the result of successive point mutations and genetic material transfer to and from related species.

PEN-susceptible VGS species contain particular pbp2x alleles distinct from those of other species of the group and S. pneumoniae. However, PBP2x genes in resistant Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (species belonging to the S. mitis group) display complex mosaic structures that are typical for resistant strains of S. pneumoniae and other members of the group41.

The decrease in affinity is evidenced when the entirety of genetic alterations leads protein to change one or more aminoacids in the site or close to the penicillin-binding site. Similarly to S. pneumoniae, decreased PEN susceptibility in VGS involves alterations in several PBPs, mainly PBPs 2x, 2b, and 1a15,44, while all high molecular-mass PBPs are modified among the fully resistant strains1.

The combinations of PEN with aminoglycosides as treatment of infective endocarditis due to VGS demonstrated synergistic behavior and doubled the rate of bacterial killing compared to the use of PEN alone34. However, VGS isolates with enzymatic resistance to streptomycin and gentamicin have been described, in which the synergistic effect was nullified30.

When the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of PEN is higher than 0.125μg/ml, and if the patient has bacterial endocarditis caused by VGS, gentamicin or streptomycin should be added to the β-lactam, trying to achieve a synergistic effect3,14.

As was demonstrated for enterococci, synergy between penicillin and aminoglycosides is achieved when penicillin concentration in the infection site is equal or higher than the respective MIC43.

Enhanced aminoglycoside uptake by the action of PEN would explain the increased rate of killing of PEN when an aminoglycoside is added. However, other authors suggested that another mechanism, not yet elucidated, may be the cause of this phenomenon in VGS24.

Evolution of beta-lactam resistance

β-Lactams are still the antibiotics of choice for treating severe infections due to VGS. Before the 80s, VGS was considered to be uniformly susceptible to PEN, but it was not noted that as early as during the 40s, PEN-non-susceptible (PNS) VGS had already been described18. Two and three decades after, several authors published the occurrence of PNS VGS8, especially in the gingival microbiota of patients receiving prophylaxis with PEN17. After 1980, higher levels of PEN MICs and higher rates of antimicrobial resistance among VGS were observed12,22.

Endocarditis due to resistant strains remains rare but a high rate of PEN nonsusceptibility was found among VGS isolated from blood samples of febrile neutropenic patients42.

More than 60% of PNS VGS, some of them with MICs of PEN as high as 32μg/ml were described in the USA and also in Argentina during the 90s. These series included large numbers of S. mitis isolated from neutropenic patients12,22. When other species were prevalent, less PNS VGS were found16,21.

According to CLSI breakpoints, about one to two thirds of VGS would be included in the resistant or intermediate categories in Argentina16,21,22. Percentages of PNS VGS of various studies are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Non-susceptibility to penicillin of viridans group streptococci, with special focus on isolates from Argentina.

Yeara  Country  Observations  PNS%  Reference 
1979  USA  10% of VGS with MICs >0.06μg/ml  10  8 
1989  Italy  No isolates with MICs >4μg/ml  22  42 
1996  USA  Some isolates with MICs >32μg/ml  66.3  12 
1998  Taiwan  11% of isolates with MICs ≥4μg/ml  25.0  39 
2000  Argentina  33.3% MICs >2μg/ml  66.0  22 
2007  Argentina  Argentinean Multicenter Study, 6.5% MICs >2μg/ml  27.5  21 
2016  Turkey  MIC90 0.5μg/ml  61.2  38 
2018  Taiwan  VGS from bacteremia cases  12.5  37 
2019  Argentina  0.8% MICs >2μg/ml  25.8  1 

PNS: penicillin nonsusceptible viridans group streptococci.

a

Year of publication.

Beta-lactam antibiotics (other than penicillin)

Currently VGS are more susceptible to carbapenems and cephalosporins than to PEN. Significant differences (I+R=0 and 3.1% vs. 25.8%, respectively)16 were found in an Argentinean study.

In another study, all VGS strains with a MIC of PEN=1μg/ml were fully susceptible to cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM) and piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ). VGS isolates with a MIC of PEN=2μg/ml were generally susceptible to the tested β-lactams, with the exception of MEM, while VGS isolates considered PEN-resistant by CLSI and EUCAST guidelines (MIC4μg/ml)10,40 were generally non-susceptible to FEP and MEM but, not necessarily to PTZ. Thus, VGS isolates with in vitro non-susceptibility to FEP, MEM, and PTZ were restricted to strains with a MIC of PEN ≥2μg/ml35.

In the USA, the new cephalosporin, ceftaroline, was in vitro active against 840 VGS with a MIC90 of 0.06μg/ml (100% susceptibility). The highest ceftaroline MIC values (0.5μg/ml) were observed in the S. mitis group33.

In the same study, higher MICs of MEM (MIC90=0.125μg/ml) and CRO (MIC90=0.5μg/ml; 2% nonsusceptibility, with one isolate having a MIC of 8μg/ml) were found. MIC90 of PEN was 0.25μg/ml, but the percentage of PNS was 15.1%.

Clinical impact of β-lactam resistant viridans group streptococciBacteremia in patients with cancer

Clinical significance of PNS has been historically described in S. pneumoniae20. However, its influence in mortality of VGS bacteremic patients was only demonstrated in two studies conducted by the same Slovakian group.

In one of those studies, including 60 patients with cancer and bacteremia due to VGS, a multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only acute leukemia and PEN-resistance were significant independent predictors of inferior outcome36.

In another of those studies, including 127 cases of bacteremia due to VGS, a significant difference was found between the evolution of patients infected with PEN-susceptible isolates and those infected with PEN-resistant isolates (mortality: 22.5% vs. 71%, respectively)25. In the latter case, only 32 patients had cancer as underlying disease.

Concern for serious infection due to β-lactam-resistant VGS is a major factor driving the empiric use of an anti-gram positive antimicrobial in febrile neutropenic patients. Patients infected by VGS with a MIC of PEN ≥2μg/ml had at least one of the following risk factors: current use of a β-lactam as antimicrobial prophylaxis, having used a β-lactam in the previous 30 days, or nosocomial VGS bacteremia onset35.

Infectious endocarditis

The American Heart Association (AHA)3, the European Society for Cardiology (ESC)14 and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)13 published guidelines for the treatment of VGS endocarditis according to type (native or prosthetic valve endocarditis) and their MIC of PEN. PEN susceptibility categories of the AHA and the BSAC did not coincide with those established by the ESC, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)10 or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)40 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Penicillin susceptibility categories in viridans group streptococci according to the different guidelines for in vitro testing or for treating patients with endocarditis.

Guidelines  Susceptible  Intermediate  Resistant  Comments 
CLSI  ≤0.12μg/ml  0.25–2μg/ml  ≥4μg/ml  2021 guidelines for in vitro interpretation 
EUCAST  ≤0.25  0.5–2μg/ml  ≥4μg/ml  2021 guidelines for in vitro interpretationMedium is supplemented with 20mg/l β-NAD 
AHA  ≤0.12μg/ml  0.25–0.5μg/ml  ≥1μg/ml  2015 guidelines for endocarditis 
ESC  ≤0.12μg/ml  0.25–2μg/ml  ≥4μg/ml  2009 guidelines for endocarditis 
BSAC  ≤0.12μg/ml  0.25–0.5μg/ml  ≥1μg/ml  2011 guidelines for endocarditis 

AHA: American Heart Association; ESC: European Society for Cardiology; BSAC: British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; EUCAST: European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

Briefly, for the AHA, the treatment of native valve endocarditis of adult patients due to PEN-susceptible VGS (MIC0.12μg/ml) is based on the use of intravenous (iv) PEN or iv/intramuscular (im) ceftriaxone (CRO) for 4 weeks, shortened treatment of 2 weeks with the use of iv/im gentamicin (GEN) or iv vancomycin (VAN) for patients allergic to β-lactams. For endocarditis caused by PNS VGS (MICs of 0.25 or 0.5μg/ml), the addition of GEN for 2 weeks is mandatory, and higher doses of PEN should be used. For endocarditis caused by VGS with MIC of PEN ≥1μg/ml and for prosthetic valve endocarditis duration of treatment may last for 6 weeks, including the use of GEN (Table 4)3.

Table 4.

Antimicrobial therapy recommended for adult patients with native valve endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci, according to penicillin minimal inhibitory concentrations of the isolates (American Heart Association)3

MIC of PEN  Antibiotics  Dosage and route  Duration 
≤0.12μg/ml  CRO  2g/24h iv/im in one dose  4 w 
  PEN  12/18MU/24h continuously or in 4–6 doses  4 w 
  PEN  12/18MU/24h continuously or in 6 doses  2 w 
  or     
  CRO  2g/24h iv/im in one dose  2 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in one dose  2 w 
  VAN  30mg/kg/24h iv in 2 doses  4 w 
0.25–0.5μg/ml  PEN  24MU/24 continuously or in 4–6 doses  4 w 
  or     
  CRO  2g/24h iv/im in 1 dose  4 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 1 dose  2 w 
  VAN  30mg/kg/24h iv in 2 doses  4 w 
≥1μg/ml  PEN  18/30MU/24 continuously or in 6 doses  4–6 w 
  or     
  AMP  12g/24h iv in 6 doses  4–6 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 3 doses  4–6 w 
  VAN  30mg/kg/24h iv in 2 doses  6 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 3 doses  6 w 

MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; CRO: ceftriaxone sodium; PEN: aqueous crystalline penicillin G sodium; GEN: gentamicin sulfate; VAN: vancomycin hydrochloride; AMP: ampicillin sodium; iv/im: intravenous/intramuscular; w: weeks; MU: millions of units.

In Tables 5 and 6, guidelines of the AHA for treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis of adult patients and native valve endocarditis of pediatric patients, are respectively shown.

Table 5.

Antimicrobial therapy recommended for adult patients with endocarditis of prosthetic valves or other prosthetic material caused by viridans group streptococci, according to penicillin minimal inhibitory concentrations of the isolates (American Heart Association)3

MIC of PEN  Antibiotics  Dosage and route  Duration 
≤0.12μg/ml  PEN  24MU/24h continuously or in 6 doses  6 w 
  or     
  CRO  2g/24h iv/im in one dose  6 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in one dose  2 w 
  VAN  30mg/kg/24h iv in 2 doses  6 w 
>0.12μg/ml  PEN  24MU/24 continuously or in 4–6 doses  6 w 
  or     
  CRO  2g/24h iv/im in 1 dose  6 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 1 dose  6 w 
  VAN  30mg/kg/24h iv in 2 doses  6 w 

MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; CRO: ceftriaxone sodium; PEN: aqueous crystalline penicillin G sodium; GEN: gentamicin sulfate; VAN: vancomycin hydrochloride; iv/im: intravenous/intramuscular; w: weeks; MU: million of units.

Table 6.

Antimicrobial therapy recommended for pediatric patients presenting native valve endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci, according to penicillin minimal inhibitory concentrations of the isolates (American Heart Association)3

MIC of PEN  Antibiotics  Dosage and route  Duration 
≤0.12μg/ml  CRO  100mg/kg per 24h iv/im in one dose  4 w 
  PEN  200000U/kg per 24h in 4–6 doses  4 w 
  PEN  200000U/kg per 24h in 4–6 doses  2 w 
  or     
  CRO  100mg/kg per 24h iv/im in one dose  2 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 1 or 3 doses  2 w 
  VAN  40mg/kg/24h iv in 2–3 doses  4 w 
0.25–0.5μg/ml  PEN  300000U/kg per 24h in 4–6 doses  4 w 
  or     
  CRO  100mg/kg per 24h iv/im in one dose  4 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 1 or 3 doses  2 w 
  VAN  40mg/kg/24h iv in 2–3 doses  4 w 
≥1μg/ml  PEN  300000U/kg per 24h in 4–6 doses  4–6 w 
  or     
  AMP  300mg/kg per 24h iv in 4–6 doses  4–6 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 3 doses  4–6 w 
  VAN  40mg/kg/24h iv in 2–3 doses  6 w 
  plus     
  GEN  3mg/kg/24h iv/im in 3 doses  6 w 

MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; CRO: ceftriaxone sodium; PEN: aqueous crystalline penicillin G sodium; GEN: gentamicin sulfate; VAN: vancomycin hydrochloride; AMP: ampicillin sodium: iv/im: intravenous/intramuscular; w: weeks; MU: million of units.

However, the appropriate treatment for cases in which the MIC of PEN is equal to or higher than 4μg/ml is not yet established. As can be seen in Table 7, different antibiotics or antibiotic combinations have been used with similar results in specific cases.

Table 7.

Cases of infective endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci resistant to more than 2μg/ml penicillin (modified from Pericàs et al.)29

Referencea  Year  Type of valve  MIC of PEN  Treatment  Outcome 
Garrod and Waterworth  1962  PEN+STR 6 w  Cured 
Garrod and Waterworth  1962  PEN+STR 10 d  Cured 
Doyle et al.  1967  10  PEN+STR 3 w  Cured 
Knoll et al.  1978  PEN (3 w)+STR (2 w)  † 
Knoll et al.  1987  PEN+GEN 4 w  Cured 
Knoll et al.  1987  GEN 4 w  Cured 
Levitz  1999  >4  VAN 4 w  Cured 
Levy et al.  2001  >4  VAN+GEN 16 d  † 
Sabella et al.  2001  VAN+GEN 4 w, VAN+CRO 2 w  Cured 
Nandakhumar et al. (7 cases)  2008  4–16  PEN or AMP+CRO or AMP+CIP or CRO+GEN 4 w  Cured 
Fujitani et al.  2008  VAN+GEN 10 d, CRO+GEN 7 d, VAN 6 w  Cured but died 4 m later 
Pericàs et al.  2001  VAN+GEN 4 w, VAN 2 w  Cured but died 10 m later 
Pericàs et al.  2016  VAN+CRO 4 d, VAN 6 w  Cured 

MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; PEN: penicillin; STR: streptomycin; w: weeks; d: days; GEN: gentamicin; VAN: vancomycin; CRO: ceftriaxone; CIP: ciprofloxacin; m: months.

a

References have been taken from Pericás et al.29 The use of VAN when the MIC is ≥4 was recommended, but there is no evidence of superiority13.

Species-specific difference in antimicrobial susceptibility among viridans group streptococci

Species belonging to the S. mitis group are the most resistant to PEN (7.6% for S. sanguinis group and 10.6% for S. mitis group) vs. S. anginosus (4.5%) and S. salivarius (2.3%) groups16.

Except for a few cases, β-lactam susceptibility data for the S. bovis and S. anginosus groups have remained relatively stable, with MICs in the susceptibility range not only to PEN, but also to AMP, AMX, CRO, OXA, and MEM4,11.

Rarely, it is possible to find isolates of the S. anginosus group susceptible to PEN but resistant to third generation cephalosporins32.

With less accurate methods to identify species, other authors arrived at different conclusions, most of them observing higher percentages of PEN resistance mainly within the S. mitis group streptococci12,21,22, and others reporting also high percentages of PNS isolates of S. salivarius and S. mutans groups. In the latter group, Chun et al. found isolates with MICs ≥4μg/ml, but it was the result of only 7 isolates (Table 8)9.

Table 8.

Occurrence of penicillin resistance (in percentages) among different species groups of viridans group streptococci.

Ref.  Category  S. mitis  S. salivarius  S. anginosus  S. bovis  S. mutans 
16  R%  0.7 
  R+I%  18.2  2.3  4.5  0.7 
21  R%  32 
  R+I%  46  12  22 
9  R%  17.2  7.3  3.1  28.6 
  R+I%  55.3  61.8  5.2  42.9 
33  R%  1.1 
  R+I%  28.8  37.7 
38  R%  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA 
  R+I%  58.3  100  54.2  NA  66.7 
39  R%  20.0  NA 
  R+I%  36.4  50  10.8  NA 
37  R%  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA 
  R+I%  17.0  29.4  9.1 

R: resistant; I: intermediate; NA: not applicable.

Conclusions

The viridans group is a heterogeneous species group, each one with its characteristic susceptibility to β-lactams. PEN nonsusceptibility is due to modifications of the PBPs, especially those of higher molecular mass. Reduced susceptibility to PEN is more frequent among isolates of S. mitis and to a lesser extent S. salivarius, than among isolates of S. anginosus or S. bovis groups. According to their relative frequency, PNS ranges from 20 to 60%. Third generation cephalosporins and carbapenems are currently more effective in vitro than PEN against VGS. The main clinical impact of PEN resistance occurs in endocarditis, where it seems to play an important role in relation to mortality.

Ethical responsibilities

Not applicable.

Funding

None declared.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

Authors are grateful to Sociedad Argentina de Bacteriología, Micología y Parasitología Clínicas (SADEBAC), a division of Asociación Argentina de Microbiología for its permanent encouragement and support.

References
[1]
A. Amoroso, D. Demares, M. Mollerach, G. Gutkind, J. Coyette.
All detectable high molecular-mass penicillin-binding proteins are modified in high-level beta-lactam resistant clinical isolate of Streptococcus mitis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 45 (2001), pp. 2075-2081
[2]
S. Angeletti, G. Dicuonzo, A. Avola, F. Crea, E. Dedej, F. Vailati, C. Farina, L. De Florio.
Viridans group streptococci clinical isolates: MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry versus gene sequence-based identification.
PLOS ONE, 10 (2015), pp. e0120502
[3]
L.M. Baddour, W.R. Wilson, A.S. Bayer, V.G. Fowler Jr., I.M. Tleyjeh, M.J. Rybak, B. Barsic, P.B. Lockhart, M.H. Gewitz, M.E. Levison, A.F. Bolger, J.M. Steckelberg, R.S. Baltimore, A.M. Fink, P. O’Gara, K.A. Taubert, American Heart Association Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Stroke Council.
Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association.
Circulation, 132 (2015), pp. 1435-1486
[4]
E. Berardinelli, H. Lopardo.
Estreptococos del grupo Streptococcus anginosus. Parte II. Patogenia y sensibilidad a los antibióticos.
Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam, 55 (2021), pp. 61-77
[5]
E. Berardinelli, M.T. Rosanova, H.A. Lopardo.
Estreptococos del grupo Streptococcus anginosus. Parte III.a. Epidemiología e infecciones de cabeza y cuello.
Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam, 55 (2021), pp. 177-189
[6]
E. Berardinelli, M.T. Rosanova, H.A. Lopardo.
Estreptococos del grupo Streptococcus anginosus. Parte III.b. Infecciones en localizaciones diferentes de las de cabeza y cuello.
Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam, 55 (2021), pp. 31-74
[7]
C.J. Bishop, D.M. Aanensen, G.E. Jordan, M. Kilian, W.P. Hanage, B.G. Spratt.
Assigning strains to bacterial species via the internet.
[8]
A.M. Bourgault, W.R. Wilson, J.A. Washington 2nd..
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of species of viridans streptococci.
J Infect Dis, 140 (1979), pp. 316-321
[9]
S. Chun, H.J. Huh, N.Y. Lee.
Species-specific difference in antimicrobial susceptibility among viridans group streptococci.
Ann Lab Med, 35 (2015), pp. 205-211
[10]
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, CLSI supplement M100.
31st ed., CLSI, (2021),
[11]
J.P. Dekker, A.F. Lau.
An update on the Streptococcus bovis group: classification, identification, and disease associations.
J Clin Microbiol, 54 (2016), pp. 1694-1699
[12]
G.V. Doern, M.J. Ferraro, A.B. Brueggemann, K.L. Ruoff.
Emergence of high rates of antimicrobial resistance among viridans group streptococci in the United States.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 40 (1996), pp. 891-894
[13]
F.K. Gould, D.W. Denning, T.S.J. Elliott, J. Foweraker, J.D. Perry, B.D. Prendergast, J.A.T. Sandoe, M.J. Spry, R.W. Watkin, Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in adults: a report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 67 (2012), pp. 269-289
[14]
G. Habib, B. Hoen, P. Tornos, F. Thuny, B. Prendergast, I. Vilacosta, P. Moreillon, M.J. Antunes, U. Thilen, J. Lekakis, M. Lengyel, L. Müller, C.K. Naber, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Moritz, J.L. Zamorano, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines.
Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer.
Eur Heart J, 30 (2009), pp. 2369-2413
[15]
R. Hakenbeck, R. Brückner, D. Denapaite, P. Maurer.
Molecular mechanism of beta-lactam resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Future Microbiol, 7 (2012), pp. 395-410
[16]
A.C. Heine, S. García, C. Barberis, C. Vay, M. Mollerach, L. Bonofiglio, A. Famiglietti.
Identificación y sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos de aislados de estreptococos del grupo viridans provenientes de pacientes internados en un hospital universitario de la ciudad de Buenos Aires.
Rev Argent Microbiol, 51 (2019), pp. 26-31
[17]
J. Hess, Y. Holloway, J. Dankert.
Penicillin prophylaxis in children with cardiac disease: postextraction bacteremia and penicillin-resistant strains of viridans streptococci.
J Infect Dis, 147 (1983), pp. 133-136
[18]
D. Kaye, R.C. Mc Cormack, E.W. Hook.
Bacterial endocarditis: the changing pattern since the introduction of penicillin therapy.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1 (1962), pp. 37-46
[19]
M. Kilian, D.R. Riley, A. Jensen, H. Bruggemann, H. Tettelin.
Parallel evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus mitis to pathogenic and mutualistic lifestyles.
mBio, 5 (2014), pp. e01490-e1514
[20]
K.P. Klugman.
Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 3 (1990), pp. 171-196
[21]
H. Lopardo, A. Blanco, L. Vigliarolo, P. Gagetti, A. Corso, grupo colaborativo de la Red WHONET.
Estudio multicéntrico nacional de resistencia a los antibióticos en estreptococos del grupo viridans.
XIII Jornadas Argentinas de Microbiología,
[22]
H. Lopardo, P. Vidal, D. Bottero, A.M. Moviglia, L.M. Gobet.
Is the diffusion method appropriate to determine the susceptibility to penicillin of viridans group streptococci? Resumen T-287. 3rd. European Congress of Chemotherapy, Madrid, May 7–10, 2000.
Rev Esp Quimioter, 13 (2000), pp. 104
[23]
H. Lopardo.
Estreptococos del grupo viridans.
Manual de Microbiología Clínica de la Asociación Argentina de Microbiología. Volumen I. Bacterias de importancia clínica. Parte II.a.2. Cocos gram positivos catalasa negativos, pp. 132-174
[24]
M.H. Miller, M.A. El-Sokkary, S.A. Feinstein, F.D. Lowy.
Penicillin-induced effects on streptomycin uptake and early bactericidal activity differ in viridans group and enterococcal streptococci.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 30 (1986), pp. 763-768
[25]
M. Mrazova, A. Docze, E. Buckova, L. Bucko, M. Kacmarikova, E. Grey, J. Korcova, J. Koprnova, Z. Saboova, P. Beno, M. Karvaj, I. Svetlansky, A. Ondrus, J. Benca, M. Taziarova, B. Rudinsky, V. Krcmery Jr..
Prospective national survey of viridans streptococcal bacteraemia risk factors, antibacterial susceptibility and outcome of 120 episodes.
Scand J Infect Dis, 37 (2005), pp. 637-641
[26]
D.R. Murdoch, G.R. Corey, B. Hoen, J.M. Miró, V.G. Fowler Jr., A.S. Bayer, A.W. Karchmer, L. Olaison, P.A. Pappas, P. Moreillon, S.T. Chambers, V.H. Chu, V. Falcó, D.J. Holland, P. Jones, J.L. Klein, N.J. Raymond, K.M. Read, M.F. Tripodi, R. Utili, A. Wang, C.W. Woods, C.H. Cabell, International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators.
Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study.
Arch Intern Med, 169 (2009), pp. 463-473
[27]
E. Mylonakis, S.B. Calderwood.
Infective endocarditis in adults.
N Engl J Med, 345 (2001), pp. 1318-1330
[28]
H. Paganini, V. Staffolani, P. Zubizarreta, L. Casimir, H. Lopardo, V. Luppino.
Viridans streptococci bacteremia in children with fever and neutropenia: a case–control study of predisposing factors.
Eur J Cancer, 39 (2003), pp. 1284-1289
[29]
J.M. Pericàs, R. Nathavitharana, C. Garcia-de-la-Mària, C. Falces, J. Ambrosioni, M. Almela, J. García-González, E. Quintana, F. Marco, A. Moreno, A.S. Bayer, J.M. Miró, A.W. Karchmer, Hospital Clínic Endocarditis Study Group.
Endocarditis caused by highly penicillin-resistant viridans group streptococci: still room for vancomycin-based regimens.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 63 (2019), pp. e00516-e519
[30]
E. Potgieter, M. Carmichael, H.J. Koornhof, L.J. Chalkey.
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of viridans streptococci isolated from blood cultures.
Eur Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 11 (1992), pp. 543-546
[31]
J. Radocha, P. Paterová, A. Zavřelová, B. Víšek, F. Gabalec, H. Žemličková, P. Žák.
Viridans group streptococci bloodstream infections in neutropenic adult patients with hematologic malignancy: single center experience.
Folia Microbiol (Praha), 63 (2018), pp. 141-146
[32]
L. Rose, W. Chasanov, H. Fraimow.
Tricuspid valve endocarditis partly due to a penicillin susceptible, ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus anginosus isolate.
Am J Ther, 24 (2017), pp. e501-e503
[33]
H.S. Sader, P.R. Rhomberg, M. Castanheira, D.J. Farrell, R.K. Flamm, R.E. Mendes, R.N. Jones.
Ceftaroline activity tested against viridans group streptococci from US hospitals.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 84 (2016), pp. 232-235
[34]
M.A. Sande, R.G. Irvin.
Penicillin-aminoglycoside synergy in experimental Streptococcus viridans endocarditis.
J Infect Dis, 129 (1974), pp. 572-576
[35]
S.A. Shelburne III, R. Lasky, P. Sahasrabhojane, J.T. Tarrand, K.V.I. Rolston.
Development and validation of a clinical model to predict the presence of β-lactam resistance in viridans group streptococci causing bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients.
Clin Infect Dis, 54 (2014), pp. 223-230
[36]
S. Spanik, J. Trupl, A. Kunova, R. Botek, D. Sorkovska, E. Grey, M. Studena, J. Lacka, E. Oravcova, A. Krchnakova, V. Rusnakova, J. Svec, I. Krupova, S. Grausova, K. Stopkova, P. Koren, V. Krcmery Jr..
Viridans streptococcal bacteraemia due to penicillin-resistant and penicillin-sensitive streptococci: analysis of risk factors and outcome in 60 patients from a single cancer centre before and after penicillin is used for prophylaxis.
Scand J Infect Dis, 29 (1997), pp. 245-249
[37]
T.-Y. Su, M.-H. Lee, C.-T. Huang, T.-P. Liu, J.-J. Lu.
The clinical impact of patients with bloodstream infection with different groups of viridans group streptococci by using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).
Medicine (Baltimore), 97 (2018), pp. e13607
[38]
S. Süzük, B. Kaşkatepe, M. Çetin.
Antimicrobial susceptibility against penicillin, ampicillin and vancomycin of viridans group Streptococcus in oral microbiota of patients at risk of infective endocarditis.
Infez Med, 24 (2016), pp. 190-193
[39]
L.J. Teng, P.R. Hsueh, Y.C. Chen, S.W. Ho, K.T. Luh.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of viridans group streptococci in Taiwan with an emphasis on the high rates of resistance to penicillin and macrolides in Streptococcus oralis.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 41 (1998), pp. 621-627
[40]
The EUCAST Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 11.0.
(2021),
[41]
M. van der Linden, J. Otten, C. Bergmann, C. Latorre, J. Liñares, R. Hakenbeck.
Insight into the diversity of penicillin-binding protein 2x alleles and mutations in viridans streptococci.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 61 (2017), pp. e02646-e2716
[42]
M. Venditti, P. Baiocchi, C. Santini, C. Braandimarte, P. Serra, G. Gentile, C. Girmenia, P. Martino.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus species that cause septicemia in neutropenic patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 33 (1989), pp. 580-582
[43]
L. Vigliarolo, M.S. Ramírez, D. Centrón, H. Lopardo.
Influencia de la concentración inhibitoria mínima de penicilina en la acción sinérgica de su combinación con gentamicina frente a estreptococos del grupo viridans.
Rev Argent Microbiol, 39 (2007), pp. 107-112
[44]
M. von Specht, G. García Gabarrot, M. Mollerach, L. Bonofiglio, P. Gagetti, S. Kaufman, L. Vigliarolo, I. Toresani, H.A. Lopardo.
Resistance to β-lactams in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Rev Argent Microbiol, (2021),
Copyright © 2022. Asociación Argentina de Microbiología
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.ram.2021.02.007
No mostrar más