was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S0325754115001224" "issn" => "03257541" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ram.2015.09.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-10-01" "aid" => "62" "copyright" => "Asociación Argentina de Microbiología" "copyrightAnyo" => "2015" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Argent Microbiol. 2015;47:344-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2191 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 41 "HTML" => 1637 "PDF" => 513 ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0325754115001145" "issn" => "03257541" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ram.2015.08.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-10-01" "aid" => "56" "copyright" => "Asociación Argentina de Microbiología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Argent Microbiol. 2015;47:350-9" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3677 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 41 "HTML" => 3016 "PDF" => 620 ] ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">ORIGINAL</span>" "titulo" => "Factores extrínsecos e intrínsecos asociados a poblaciones fúngicas micotoxigénicas de granos de maíz (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Zea mays</span> L.) almacenados en silos bolsa en Argentina" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "350" "paginaFinal" => "359" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Extrinsic and intrinsic factors associated with mycotoxigenic fungi populations of maize grains (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Zea mays</span> L.) stored in silobags in Argentina" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Claudia C. Castellari, María G. Cendoya, Facundo J. Marcos Valle, Viviana Barrera, Ana M. Pacin" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Claudia C." "apellidos" => "Castellari" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "María G." "apellidos" => "Cendoya" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Facundo J." "apellidos" => "Marcos Valle" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Viviana" "apellidos" => "Barrera" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ana M." "apellidos" => "Pacin" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0325754115001145?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/03257541/0000004700000004/v2_201602050024/S0325754115001145/v2_201602050024/es/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S032575411500125X" "issn" => "03257541" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ram.2015.09.004" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2015-10-01" "aid" => "65" "copyright" => "Asociación Argentina de Microbiología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Argent Microbiol. 2015;47:335-43" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 1983 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 35 "HTML" => 1391 "PDF" => 557 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "The decrease in the population of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus</span> in sugarcane after nitrogen fertilization is related to plant physiology in split root experiments" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "335" "paginaFinal" => "343" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "La disminución de la población de <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus</span> en caña de azúcar, después de la fertilización nitrogenada, está relacionada con la fisiología de las plantas en experimentos de raíz dividida" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 3411 "Ancho" => 2383 "Tamanyo" => 255487 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Bacterial population inside roots in split root experiments. Each value represents the media of data for five independent plants (Log of cell number/g root) with the respective standard deviation. Mean values with equal letters are not statistically different at <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05, using the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>-Student test. dpi: days post inoculation; dpf: days post fertilization; ND: not detected; N+: addition of 180<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg of nitrogen/plant.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Osvaldo Rodríguez-Andrade, Luis E. Fuentes-Ramírez, Yolanda E. Morales-García, Dalia Molina-Romero, María R. Bustillos-Cristales, Rebeca D. Martínez-Contreras, Jesús Muñoz-Rojas" "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Osvaldo" "apellidos" => "Rodríguez-Andrade" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Luis E." "apellidos" => "Fuentes-Ramírez" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Yolanda E." "apellidos" => "Morales-García" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Dalia" "apellidos" => "Molina-Romero" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "María R." "apellidos" => "Bustillos-Cristales" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Rebeca D." "apellidos" => "Martínez-Contreras" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jesús" "apellidos" => "Muñoz-Rojas" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S032575411500125X?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/03257541/0000004700000004/v2_201602050024/S032575411500125X/v2_201602050024/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Control of agitation and aeration rates in the production of surfactin in foam overflowing fed-batch culture with industrial fermentation" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "344" "paginaFinal" => "349" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Shulin Yao, Shengming Zhao, Zhaoxin Lu, Yuqi Gao, Fengxia Lv, Xiaomei Bie" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Shulin" "apellidos" => "Yao" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Shengming" "apellidos" => "Zhao" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Zhaoxin" "apellidos" => "Lu" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Yuqi" "apellidos" => "Gao" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Fengxia" "apellidos" => "Lv" ] 5 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Xiaomei" "apellidos" => "Bie" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "bxm43@jiau.edu.cn" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Food Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Agriculture of China, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, PR China" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Control de las tasas de aireación y agitación en la producción de surfactina en un cultivo alimentado <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">(fed-batch)</span> en espuma desbordante con fermentación industrial" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1884 "Ancho" => 3259 "Tamanyo" => 281994 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Effect of agitation and aeration rate on foam overflowing flow rate (up) and surfactin concentration in the overflowing foam (down) at 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (A and D), 21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (B and E), and 33<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (C and F) by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 in batch culture.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Biosurfactants are amphiphilic molecules widely produced by a variety of microorganisms, which have been considered as an alternative to chemical surfactants. Lipopeptides are one of the major types of biosurfactants<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a>. As the most effective biosurfactant that has been found so far, surfactin can lower the surface tension of water from 72 to 27<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mN/m<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,12</span></a>. Surfactin exhibits antibacterial and antiviral properties and biodegradability, and appears to be promising for applications in areas such as bioremediation and oil recovery<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2,15</span></a>. However, after almost 50 years, surfactin is not yet a viable alternative to chemical surfactants because of the low yield in bioreactors<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a>, its relatively high medium cost, and severe foaming in aerated and stirred bioreactors<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a>. Therefore, the production of surfactin is still limited to laboratory scale<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a>. To cope with these problems, renewable substrates and foam overflow fermentation were used in recent years<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,9</span></a>.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some studies on fed-batch culture of surfactin have been undertaken in the past few years<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4,5,16</span></a>. In foam overflowing fed-batch culture (FOFC), the flow rates of the feed and of the overflow foam were equal, and thus the broth volume in the bioreactor was kept constant, and continuous enrichment of surfactin in foam overflow was accomplished<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>. It has been shown that by controlling the agitation and aeration rates, maximum surfactin productivity could be achieved when the oxygen volumetric mass transfer coefficient (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">k</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">L</span>a) value was 0.0132/s<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a>. However, the effect of agitation and aeration rates on surfactin enrichment in the foam has not been reported.</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In our previous studies, we identified a strain of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> as producer of five surfactin homologues by using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry methods<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a>. A high yield of surfactin from strain <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">B. amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 was obtained by genome shuffling, and a method for surfactin determination was established<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a>.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In this work, a semi-defined medium, which is of low cost and high yield compared with the commonly used Landy medium, was initially combined with foam overflow batch culture. The effect of agitation and aeration rates on the foam overflowing rate (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span>) and surfactin enrichment in the batch culture process were studied. By using fed-batch culture, a continuous, high concentration enrichment of surfactin could be achieved. This novel fermentation technology has a potential for the industrial application of surfactin production.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Materials and methods</span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Microorganism and culture media</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">B. amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 (CGMCC No. 6249), the surfactin producer used in this study, is registered by the China Committee for Culture Collection of Microorganisms.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The seed medium (BPY) consisted of: beef extract 5.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, peptone 10.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, yeast extract 5.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, glucose 10.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l and NaCl 5.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l (pH 7.0).</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The semi-defined medium (IBM) used for fermentation was optimized by the Taguchi method in our previous work, and consisted of: corn powder 35<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, ammonium nitrate 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, urea 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, KCl 1.47<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, NaH<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>PO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">4</span> 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmol/l, MnSO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">4</span> 0.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmol/l, MgSO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">4</span> 0.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mmol/l, CuSO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">4</span> 12.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μmol/l, FeSO<span class="elsevierStyleInf">4</span> 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μmol/l and CaCl<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span> 0.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μmol/l (pH 7.0).</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Flask and bioreactor culture conditions</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the primary inoculum, a loop of colonies from a fresh potato dextrose agar-slant was transferred into 50<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml BPY medium in shaken flasks (250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml) and cultured at 37<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>°C and 180<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm for 12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h. For the secondary inoculation, 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml of the primary culture was inoculated into 200<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml BPY medium in shaken flasks<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a>, and cultured in the same conditions as those in the primary inoculum.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Bioreactor cultivation was performed in a 19 l bioreactor containing 12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l of medium (L1523, Bioengineering AG, Switzerland); the temperature was controlled at 32<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>°C and the pH was maintained at 7.0 with the automatic addition of 4.0<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mol/l NaOH. Three control strategies were adopted in batch cultivation to investigate the effects of agitation and aeration rates on <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> and surfactin enrichment in foam from overflowing cultures. The agitation and aeration rates were controlled as shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>. In control 1, the agitation and aeration rates were controlled at 200<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm and at 0.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm respectively. In control 2, the agitation and aeration rates were controlled at a relatively high level; the agitation rate was 300<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm and the aeration was increased from 1.2 to 2.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm as the foam overflowed and the medium volume in the bioreactor was reduced.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia></span></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Analytical methods</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The colony forming units (CFU) were calculated using plate colony-counting methods. Dry cell weight (DCW) was obtained by collecting the fermentation broth with different incubation times in the IBM medium. After centrifugation at 1000<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">g</span> for 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min, the collected pellets were dried for 8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h at 90<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>°C and the dry cells weighed<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a>. Then, the dry cell weight (DCW) was determined using a pre-determined standard curve relating the number of colony forming units (CFU) to the dry weight: DCW<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>2.43<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>log CFU/ml<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>18.63, with an <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">R</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> value of 0.92. Results were represented as CFU per milliliter.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Culture samples were precipitated and then extracted with methanol as described by Cooper <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">et al</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> in the extraction of surfactin. Surfactin concentration in crude samples was determined by reverse phase HPLC (U-3000, Dionex, United States) equipped with an Agilent C18 column (4.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm, Agilent, United States) and a UV detector. About 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>μl of the surfactin sample was injected into the column and then eluted with acetonitrile with 0.1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>% TFA at a flow rate of 0.84<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>ml/min. Eluent absorbance was monitored at 210<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>nm<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a>. Quantization was performed based on a standard curve using a standard sample of surfactin (Sigma–Aldrich Co., United Sates). The standard curve equation is: <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">y</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>17.771<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">x</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>−<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>38.742 (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">R</span><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.999). The equation for the calculation of the specific growth rate (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">μ</span>/<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">h</span>) was: <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">μ</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>d<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">X</span>/(<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">X</span>·d<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>); the equation for the calculation of the specific growth rate (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">qp</span>/<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">g</span>/(<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">g</span>*<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">h</span>)) was: qp<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>dP/(<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">X</span>·d<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>), <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">X</span>: cell yield (g/l); <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">P</span>: product yield (U/ml); <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>: fermentation time (h).</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Results and discussion</span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Effect of the control strategy on cell specific growth rate</span><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The effect of agitation and aeration rates on cell growth in the three control strategies adopted in this study in batch culture is shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Figure 1</a>. In controls 1 and 2, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">B. amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 in the bioreactor reached up to 10<span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>CFU/ml after 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>±<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h culture, and then the cell growth went into stationary phase (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>A). However, in control 3, cell growth declined from 12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h of cultivation. That may be due to the agitation rate changing between 150 and 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm; normal cell growth seemed to be inhibited and the biomass decreased due to the simultaneous increase of the overflow. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">B. amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 reached its maximum specific cell growth rate at 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h of cultivation in control 1, which was 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h earlier than in control 2 (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>B). In control 3, where cell growth was disturbed, a lower specific cell growth rate was observed. The maximum specific cell growth rate was lowered nearly by half with respect to controls 1 and 2. Although the increase in the agitation rate promoted quadratic cell growth, this one was not delayed.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Surfactin production is essentially associated with cell growth<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7,16</span></a>, although high biomass does not necessarily mean high surfactin production. It seems that a lower specific growth rate is more conducive to the production of biosurfactants such as mycosubtilin<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a>. The effect of agitation and aeration rates on cell growth and cell specific growth rate was studied in this paper and the best control strategy was chosen to enhance surfactin production.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Effect of the control strategy on <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">out</span></span> and the concentration and production of enriched surfactin in foam</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Foam began to overflow outside the bioreactor after 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h of cultivation (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>A). The maximum <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> in control 1 was 0.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h while in control 2 it was 1.3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h, which indicated that the foam overflow was significantly affected by the agitation and aeration rates used in different strategies. The surfactin concentration in the overflow foam also changed with time. As shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Figure 2</a>B, different trends were observed in the three control strategies. In control 3, surfactin concentration increased linearly and showed the highest specific production rate, reaching a maximum of 0.426<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>C).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The linear increase of surfactin concentration and the relatively high specific production rate in control 3 (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>B and C) indicated that high surfactin enrichment in foam may be achieved by a combined control of the agitation and aeration rates at a reasonable level. As shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Figure 2</a>B, the maximum surfactin concentration in foam reached 3.342<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/ml and the maximum surfactin production in foam reached 2.525<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g (approximately overflowing 7.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l foam) in control 3. However, maximum surfactin concentration and maximum surfactin production were 1.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/ml and 8.46<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g (approximately overflowing 4.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l of foam) in control 1, respectively. These results in control 3, which show the linear increase of surfactin concentration and the relatively high specific production rate, are similar to those in the study by Davis <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">et al</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>, the enrichment of surfactin in the foam was enhanced to 0.44<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l with the time going by supplementing culture broth in the stationary phase<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>. Foam stopped overflowing at 22<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h in control 1 and at 26<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h in controls 2 and 3. This was partly due to the medium level in the bioreactor dropping as overflowing foam: however; the surfactin in the foam was thus separated from the broth almost completely<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>. Apparently, continuous surfactin production in the bioreactor ensured an increasing trend of surfactin concentration in the foam. With the agitation and aeration rate controlled under different strategies, the surfactin production presented a different kinetic trend. Control 3, under which <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> was below 0.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h, indicated that surfactin enrichment may be improved through stir speed and aeration control.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Influence of agitation and aeration rates on <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">out</span></span> and concentration of enriched surfactin</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The influence of agitation and aeration rates on <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> and surfactin enrichment in the overflowing foam were investigated in batch culture experiments conducted using a series of combinations of aeration and agitation rates. Foam overflow began after 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h of cultivation (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>A). As indicated in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>(A–C), <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> tended to increase with an increased aeration rate from 1 to 1.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm and agitation rate from 150 to 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm. At 33<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> was extremely low, only a maximum 0.14<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l per hour (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>C); however, raising the aeration rate to 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm, the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> could increase to a maximum 1.76 per hour.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Agitation and aeration rates significantly affected the concentration of surfactin in the foam. In the early stage of fermentation (i.e. at 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>A), an increase in agitation rate increased <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span>; however, the surfactin concentration was at a relatively low level and decreased from 1.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l to 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l with the agitation increase. At 21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h, the maximum surfactin concentration of 4.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l occurred at 150<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm agitation and 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm aeration. With the increase of agitation to 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm, the surfactin concentration was reduced to 1.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l. Interestingly, the change in the agitation rate had no effect on the surfactin concentration at 1.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm aeration (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>E). At 33<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h, the surfactin concentration in the foam was maintained at >2.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l with an aeration rate of 1.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm and it did not drop with an increasing agitation rate. However, under the condition of aeration rate at 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm, the surfactin concentration in the foam was 2.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l only with the agitation rate of 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm. Apparently, the agitation and aeration rates significantly affected the concentration of surfactin enriched in the foam.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The agitation and aeration rates in the aerobic fermentation greatly affected the foam formation rate and the surfactin concentration in the foam. Similar to our case, a previous study observed that a higher stirring speed or aeration rate led to a higher <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>. However, surfactin enrichment in this study presented a different kinetic relationship with <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> compared to that in the basic study by Davis <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">et al</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>, in which the foam continuously overflowed under a constant agitation rate. In the late stages of batch FOFC, such as at 33<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>F), the surfactin concentration in the foam was lower than at an earlier stage (21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h), because > 50% of the culture broth in the bioreactor was gone. Thus, the broth level in the bioreactor was too low to maintain the overflowing foam and further foam formation was also limited because almost all the surfactin had already been drained away in the foam. Both the surfactin concentration in the foam and <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> were determined by the surfactin produced in the broth. Furthermore, the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> level affected the surfactin enrichment, and at the same time, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> was influenced by the agitation and aeration rates.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Fed-batch culture with controlled agitation and aeration rates</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A fed-batch culture process was also adopted in this study. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Figure 4</a> shows that foam began to overflow after 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h of cultivation. Afterwards, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> gradually dropped from 0.6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h to 0.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h by real-time control of the agitation and aeration rates and was maintained at this rate. From 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h, the IBM medium was fed into the bioreactor at a 0.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h feed rate (matching <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span>). In this culture, the biomass was kept above 10<span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>CFU/ml. Foam continued to overflow until the cultivation terminated and surfactin was enriched in the foam with a concentration >4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l; the maximum concentration reached 4.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l. At the end of the fermentation, the surfactin concentration in the culture broth in the bioreactor was very low (data not shown), which means that almost all the surfactin was transferred into the foam.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In other studies of foam overflowing cultures, although the product was enriched and separated in foam, the foam overflowed spontaneously, and thus the surfactin concentration in it fluctuated<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,10,16</span></a>. For this reason, surfactin in the foam was not enriched to a very high level; in previous studies, in which surfactin was produced by potato process effluent, it was 1.67<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l and 0.9<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,10</span></a>. Thus, controlled foam overflow in this work achieved almost 3 and 4 times the surfactin concentration compared with the previous studies, respectively<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6,10</span></a>. Furthermore, the medium feeding in our study overcame disruption of cell growth, which ensured that surfactin was continuously produced. Combined with control of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> at a low level, the surfactin concentration in the foam was maintained above 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l, which will significantly reduce production costs and improve industrial production capacity.</p></span></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Conclusions</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our study focused on the control of agitation and aeration rates in foam overflowing fermentation to improve surfactin enrichment and continuous high-level production. In batch mode, the agitation and aeration rates were found to have a close relationship with cell growth and surfactin production. In further research, our study revealed that <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> does not always negatively impact on the surfactin concentration in the foam. The broth level in the bioreactor and the surfactin residue in the broth also affect both <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> and the surfactin enrichment of the foam.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Through feeding the medium into the bioreactor, a fed-batch fermentation process was successfully established in which foam overflowed at a controlled flow rate of 0.2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>l/h, and surfactin in the enriched foam was kept at a level above 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Ethical disclosures</span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Protection of human and animal subjects</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.</p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Confidentiality of data</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Right to privacy and informed consent</span><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.</p></span></span><span id="sec0085" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:13 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres602698" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec616753" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres602697" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec616754" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Microorganism and culture media" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Flask and bioreactor culture conditions" ] ] ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Analytical methods" ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Results and discussion" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Effect of the control strategy on cell specific growth rate" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Effect of the control strategy on f and the concentration and production of enriched surfactin in foam" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Influence of agitation and aeration rates on f and concentration of enriched surfactin" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Fed-batch culture with controlled agitation and aeration rates" ] ] ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Ethical disclosures" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Protection of human and animal subjects" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Confidentiality of data" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Right to privacy and informed consent" ] ] ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0085" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xack202833" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" ] 12 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2014-12-04" "fechaAceptado" => "2015-09-07" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec616753" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Surfactin" 1 => "Agitation rate" 2 => "Aeration rate" 3 => "Foam overflowing" 4 => "Fed-batch culture" 5 => "Industrial fermentation" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec616754" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Surfactina" 1 => "Tasa de agitación" 2 => "Tasa de aireación" 3 => "Espuma desbordante" 4 => "Cultivo <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">fed-batch</span>" 5 => "Fermentación industrial" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 produces a high yield of surfactin, a lipopeptide-type biosurfactant that has been widely studied and has potential applications in many fields. A foam overflowing culture has been successfully used in the combined production-enrichment fermentation of surfactin. In this study, the agitation and aeration rates were found to have relationships with foam formation and surfactin enrichment. A maximum surfactin concentration of 4.7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l of foam was obtained after 21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h of culture with an agitation rate of 150<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm and an aeration rate of 1<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm in fed-batch culture. By controlling the foam overflow rate (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span>) of a fed-batch culture, surfactin concentration in the foam was continuously maintained above 4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l.</p></span>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 produce gran cantidad de surfactina, un biosurfactante de tipo lipopeptídico que ha sido objeto de estudios pormenorizados y tiene aplicaciones en muchos campos. El cultivo en espuma desbordante se ha utilizado con éxito en la fermentación combinada de producción-enriquecimiento de surfactina. En este estudio, se halló que las tasas de aireación y agitación tienen relación con la formación de espuma y el enriquecimiento de la surfactina. Se obtuvo una concentración máxima de surfactina de 4,7<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>g/l de espuma después de 21 h de cultivo con una tasa de agitación de 150 rpm y una tasa de aireación de 1 vvm en un cultivo alimentado <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">(fed-batch)</span>. Al controlar la tasa de espuma desbordante (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span>) de un cultivo <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">fed-batch</span>, la concentración de surfactina en la espuma se mantuvo continua por encima de 4 g/l.</p></span>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:5 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1033 "Ancho" => 2670 "Tamanyo" => 112598 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Time courses of CFU (A) and cell specific growth rate (B) by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 in batch culture with three control strategies. In control 1, the agitation rate was 200<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm, and the aeration rate was 0.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm; in control 2, the agitation rate was 300<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm, and the aeration rate increased from 1.2 to 2.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm; in control 3, the agitation rate changed between 150 and 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm to keep the overflowing flow rate at a relatively moderate level, and the aeration rate was kept at 1.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 848 "Ancho" => 3168 "Tamanyo" => 146949 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Time courses of foam overflowing flow rate (A), surfactin concentration in the foam (B) and specific production rate (C) in batch culture of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 with three control strategies. In control 1, the agitation rate was 200<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm, and the aeration rate was 0.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm; in control 2, the agitation rate was 300<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm, and the aeration rate increased from 1.2 to 2.66<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm; in control 3, the agitation rate was changed between 150 and 250<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>rpm to keep <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> at a relatively moderate level, and the aeration rate was kept at 1.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>vvm.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1884 "Ancho" => 3259 "Tamanyo" => 281994 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Effect of agitation and aeration rate on foam overflowing flow rate (up) and surfactin concentration in the overflowing foam (down) at 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (A and D), 21<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (B and E), and 33<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>h (C and F) by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 in batch culture.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1270 "Ancho" => 2166 "Tamanyo" => 126327 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Time course profiles of CFU, surfactin concentration in foam, and foam overflowing flow rate (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span>) during fed-batch fermentation of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> fmb50 under controlled agitation and aeration rate to keep <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">f</span><span class="elsevierStyleInf">out</span> constant.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Control \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Agitation rate (rpm) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Aeration (vvm) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">200 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.66 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">300 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.2–2.66 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">150–250 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab986780.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Control strategy of agitation and aeration rates.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:17 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Surfactin, a crystalline peptidelipid surfactant produced by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span>: isolation, characterization and its inhibition of fibrin clot formation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K. Arima" 1 => "A. Kakinuma" 2 => "G. Tamura" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Biochem Biophys Res Commun" "fecha" => "1968" "volumen" => "31" "paginaInicial" => "488" "paginaFinal" => "494" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4968234" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution remediation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "I.M. Banat" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Bioresour Technol" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "51" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "12" ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Enhanced production of surfactin from <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> by continuous product removal and metal cation additions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "D.G. Cooper" 1 => "C.R. MacDonald" 2 => "S.J.B. Du" 3 => "N. Kosaric" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Appl Environ Microbiol" "fecha" => "1981" "volumen" => "42" "paginaInicial" => "408" "paginaFinal" => "412" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16345840" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Control of the specific growth rate of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> for the production of biosurfactant lipopeptides in bioreactors with foam overflow" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "S. Chenikher" 1 => "J.S. Guez" 2 => "F. Coutte" 3 => "M. Pekpe" 4 => "P. Jacques" 5 => "J.P. Cassar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Process Biochem" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "45" "paginaInicial" => "1800" "paginaFinal" => "1807" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Production of surfactin and fengycin by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> in a bubbleless membrane bioreactor" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:7 [ 0 => "F. Coutte" 1 => "D. Lecouturier" 2 => "S. Ait Yahia" 3 => "V. Leclère" 4 => "M. Bèchet" 5 => "P. Jacques" 6 => "P. Dhulster" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00253-010-2504-8" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Appl Microbiol Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "87" "paginaInicial" => "499" "paginaFinal" => "507" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20221757" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The application of foaming for the recovery of surfactin from <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">B. subtilis</span> ATCC 21332 cultures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D.A. Davis" 1 => "H.C. Lynch" 2 => "J. Varley" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Enzyme Microb Technol" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "28" "paginaInicial" => "346" "paginaFinal" => "354" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11240190" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Setting up and modelling of overflowing fed-batch cultures of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> for the production and continuous removal of lipopeptides" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J.S. Guez" 1 => "S. Chenikher" 2 => "J.P. Cassar" 3 => "P. Jacques" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.025" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "131" "paginaInicial" => "67" "paginaFinal" => "75" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17624460" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Repeated-batch fermentation using flocculent hybrid, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</span> CHFY0321 for efficient production of bioethanol" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "W.C. Gi" 1 => "W.K. Hyun" 2 => "K.M. Se" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00253-009-1946-3" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Appl Microbiol Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "84" "paginaInicial" => "261" "paginaFinal" => "269" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19319524" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Advances in utilization of renewable substrates for biosurfactant production" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R.S. Makkar" 1 => "S.S. Cameotra" 2 => "I.M. Banat" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/2191-0855-1-1" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "AMB Express" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "19" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906327" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Surfactin production from potato process effluent by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> in a chemostat" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K.S. Noah" 1 => "D.F. Bruhn" 2 => "G.A. Bala" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Appl Biochem Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "121" "paginaInicial" => "465" "paginaFinal" => "473" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15920256" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0735109713000430" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "07351097" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Development of continuous surfactin production from potato process effluent by <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> in an airlift reactor" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "K.S. Noah" 1 => "S.L. Fox" 2 => "D.F. Bruhn" 3 => "D.N. Thompson" 4 => "G.A. Bala" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Appl Biochem Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "98" "paginaInicial" => "803" "paginaFinal" => "813" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12018303" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Production of a lipopeptide antibiotic, surfactin, by recombinant <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span> in solid state fermentation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A.T. Ohno" 1 => "M. Ano" 2 => "T. Shoda" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/bit.260470212" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Biotechnol Bioeng" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "47" "paginaInicial" => "209" "paginaFinal" => "214" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18623394" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Response surface optimization of the critical media components for production of surfactin" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "R. Sen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Chem Technol Biotechnol" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "263" "paginaFinal" => "270" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Isolation and characterization of a co-producer of fengycins and surfactins, endophytic <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> ES-2, from <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Scutellaria baicalensis</span> Georgi" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "L.J. Sun" 1 => "Z.X. Lu" 2 => "X.M. Bie" 3 => "F.X. Lu" 4 => "S.Y. Yan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "World J Microbiol Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "22" "paginaInicial" => "1259" "paginaFinal" => "1266" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Surfactin – a review, on biosynthesis, fermentation, purification and applications" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "N.S. Shaligram" 1 => "R.S. Singhal" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Food Technol Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "48" "paginaInicial" => "119" "paginaFinal" => "134" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Bioreactor design for enhanced carrier-assisted surfactin production with <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus subtilis</span>" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.S. Yeh" 1 => "Y.H. Wei" 2 => "J.S. Chang" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Process Biochem" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "41" "paginaInicial" => "1799" "paginaFinal" => "1805" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Genome shuffling of <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</span> for improving antimicrobial lipopeptide production and an analysis of relative gene expression using FQ RT-PCR" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:8 [ 0 => "J.F. Zhao" 1 => "Y.H. Li" 2 => "C. Zhang" 3 => "Z. Yao" 4 => "L. Zhang" 5 => "X.M. Bie" 6 => "F.X. Lu" 7 => "Z.X. Lu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s10295-012-1098-9" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "889" "paginaFinal" => "896" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22350068" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "agradecimientos" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "identificador" => "xack202833" "titulo" => "Acknowledgements" "texto" => "<p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This work was supported by grants from the <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs1">National Natural Science Foundation of China</span> (grant no. <span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs1">31271828</span>) and the <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs2">National Science and Technology Support program</span> (grant no. <span class="elsevierStyleGrantNumber" refid="gs2">2011BAD23B05</span>).</p>" "vista" => "all" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/03257541/0000004700000004/v2_201602050024/S0325754115001224/v2_201602050024/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "37862" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Microbiología agrícola, ambiental e industrial" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/03257541/0000004700000004/v2_201602050024/S0325754115001224/v2_201602050024/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0325754115001224?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 October | 18 | 4 | 22 |
2024 September | 32 | 11 | 43 |
2024 August | 21 | 4 | 25 |
2024 July | 25 | 5 | 30 |
2024 June | 26 | 8 | 34 |
2024 May | 27 | 10 | 37 |
2024 April | 32 | 12 | 44 |
2024 March | 55 | 14 | 69 |
2024 February | 53 | 3 | 56 |
2024 January | 54 | 6 | 60 |
2023 December | 40 | 8 | 48 |
2023 November | 46 | 10 | 56 |
2023 October | 59 | 6 | 65 |
2023 September | 33 | 5 | 38 |
2023 August | 19 | 2 | 21 |
2023 July | 38 | 10 | 48 |
2023 June | 30 | 4 | 34 |
2023 May | 31 | 8 | 39 |
2023 April | 28 | 5 | 33 |
2023 March | 28 | 6 | 34 |
2023 February | 55 | 13 | 68 |
2023 January | 31 | 5 | 36 |
2022 December | 51 | 11 | 62 |
2022 November | 59 | 12 | 71 |
2022 October | 55 | 10 | 65 |
2022 September | 35 | 12 | 47 |
2022 August | 48 | 17 | 65 |
2022 July | 46 | 14 | 60 |
2022 June | 39 | 7 | 46 |
2022 May | 50 | 9 | 59 |
2022 April | 69 | 16 | 85 |
2022 March | 112 | 19 | 131 |
2022 February | 137 | 13 | 150 |
2022 January | 92 | 9 | 101 |
2021 December | 78 | 18 | 96 |
2021 November | 79 | 16 | 95 |
2021 October | 90 | 17 | 107 |
2021 September | 65 | 14 | 79 |
2021 August | 86 | 29 | 115 |
2021 July | 56 | 12 | 68 |
2021 June | 45 | 13 | 58 |
2021 May | 68 | 19 | 87 |
2021 April | 137 | 66 | 203 |
2021 March | 61 | 22 | 83 |
2021 February | 62 | 12 | 74 |
2021 January | 49 | 9 | 58 |
2020 December | 51 | 6 | 57 |
2020 November | 57 | 22 | 79 |
2020 October | 29 | 3 | 32 |
2020 September | 30 | 9 | 39 |
2020 August | 38 | 4 | 42 |
2020 July | 41 | 6 | 47 |
2020 June | 41 | 13 | 54 |
2020 May | 51 | 15 | 66 |
2020 April | 53 | 13 | 66 |
2020 March | 54 | 8 | 62 |
2020 February | 57 | 14 | 71 |
2020 January | 36 | 3 | 39 |
2019 December | 31 | 6 | 37 |
2019 November | 50 | 11 | 61 |
2019 October | 40 | 13 | 53 |
2019 September | 53 | 7 | 60 |
2019 August | 28 | 11 | 39 |
2019 July | 35 | 6 | 41 |
2019 June | 81 | 8 | 89 |
2019 May | 190 | 1 | 191 |
2019 April | 89 | 14 | 103 |
2019 March | 26 | 4 | 30 |
2019 February | 25 | 6 | 31 |
2019 January | 19 | 4 | 23 |
2018 December | 20 | 6 | 26 |
2018 November | 35 | 6 | 41 |
2018 October | 45 | 12 | 57 |
2018 September | 40 | 5 | 45 |
2018 August | 15 | 15 | 30 |
2018 July | 17 | 2 | 19 |
2018 June | 15 | 2 | 17 |
2018 May | 22 | 9 | 31 |
2018 April | 27 | 13 | 40 |
2018 March | 19 | 2 | 21 |
2018 February | 8 | 4 | 12 |
2018 January | 11 | 4 | 15 |
2017 December | 16 | 2 | 18 |
2017 November | 14 | 5 | 19 |
2017 October | 9 | 10 | 19 |
2017 September | 13 | 4 | 17 |
2017 August | 9 | 6 | 15 |
2017 July | 8 | 5 | 13 |
2017 June | 10 | 8 | 18 |
2017 May | 20 | 9 | 29 |
2017 April | 14 | 15 | 29 |
2017 March | 11 | 52 | 63 |
2017 February | 30 | 1 | 31 |
2017 January | 10 | 7 | 17 |
2016 December | 23 | 9 | 32 |
2016 November | 35 | 9 | 44 |
2016 October | 42 | 21 | 63 |
2016 September | 53 | 11 | 64 |
2016 August | 45 | 11 | 56 |
2016 July | 20 | 2 | 22 |
2016 June | 41 | 22 | 63 |
2016 May | 29 | 19 | 48 |
2016 April | 30 | 13 | 43 |
2016 March | 58 | 28 | 86 |
2016 February | 31 | 26 | 57 |
2016 January | 43 | 28 | 71 |
2015 December | 9 | 6 | 15 |