metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition) Characterization of patients with dermatomyositis in a university hospital in Co...
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue 1.
Pages 47-55 (January - March 2023)
Visits
1046
Vol. 30. Issue 1.
Pages 47-55 (January - March 2023)
Original Investigation
Full text access
Characterization of patients with dermatomyositis in a university hospital in Colombia
Caracterización de pacientes con dermatomiositis en un hospital universitario en Colombia
Visits
1046
Laura P. Charrya, Adriana Alejoa,
Corresponding author
adriana-alejov@javeriana.edu.co

Corresponding author.
, Melissa Cantillob, Daniel G. Fernández-Ávilac
a Dermatology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
b Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
c Rheumatology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Abstract
Introduction

Dermatomyositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy characterized by the presence of skin lesions; it is considered a heterogeneous disease, due to its clinical presentation, course, and prognosis. In Colombia there are few records that describe the clinical characteristics of these patients.

Methods

Cross-sectional study. Medical records of patients who consulted a university hospital in Colombia between January 2004 and December 2019 were reviewed. The records were obtained using databases from the dermatology, rheumatology, dermatopathology, and electrophysiology units, and CIE10 diagnostic codes.

Results

Seventy patients with a dermatomyositis diagnosis were found, 63 (90%) fulfilled the Bohan and Peter diagnostic criteria and 7 (10%) had amyopathic dermatomyositis, with an average age of 43 years (SD ± 15.3). Forty-eight were women (68.5%). The most frequent clinical signs were Gottron’s papules 80%, periorbital violaceous (heliotrope) erythema with edema 78.5% (n = 55) and poikiloderma 75.7% (n = 53). The most frequently found systemic manifestations were dysphagia (21.4%, n = 15), interstitial lung disease (11.4%, n = 8), and pulmonary hypertension (8.5%, n = 6). Cancer was documented in 8.5% (n = 6) of patients.

Conclusion

We showed clinical information of patients with dermatomyositis in a referral hospital in Colombia. The data obtained is consistent with information from other case series worldwide.

Keywords:
Dermatomyositis
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies
Colombia
Latin America
Resumen
Introducción

La dermatomiositis es una miopatía inflamatoria idiopática que se caracteriza por presentar lesiones en piel; por su presentación clínica, su curso y su pronóstico, se la considera una enfermedad heterogénea. En Colombia existen pocos registros que describan las características clínicas de los pacientes afectados por esta enfermedad.

Métodos

Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, se revisaron historias clínicas de pacientes que consultaron a un hospital universitario en Colombia entre enero del 2004 y diciembre del 2019. Los registros se obtuvieron utilizando bases de datos de las unidades de dermatología, reumatología, dermatopatología, electrofisiología y códigos diagnósticos CIE10 asociados con dermatomiositis.

Resultados

Se obtuvieron 70 pacientes con diagnóstico de dermatomiositis, 63 (90%) de los cuales cumplían criterios de clasificación de Bohan y Peter, en tanto que siete (10%) presentaban dermatomiositis amiopática. El promedio de edad fue de 43 años (DS ± 15,3); 48 fueron mujeres (68,5%); los signos clínicos más frecuentes fueron: pápulas de Gottron (80%, n = 56), eritema heliotropo (78,5%, n = 55) y poiquilodermia (75,7%, n = 53). Las manifestaciones sistémicas más comúnmente encontradas fueron: disfagia (21,4%, n = 15), enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (11,4%, n = 8) e hipertensión pulmonar (8,5%, n = 6). Se documentó cáncer en el 8,5% (n = 6) de los pacientes.

Conclusión

Se presenta información clínica de pacientes con dermatomiositis en un centro hospitalario de referencia en Colombia; los datos obtenidos concuerdan con la información de otros estudios de series de casos a escala mundial.

Palabras clave:
Dermatomiositis
Miopatías inflamatorias idiopáticas
Colombia
América Latina
Full Text
Introduction

Inflammatory myopathies are considered rare diseases, however, among them, dermatomyositis is the most common, except in elderly patients, in whom inclusion body myositis predominates.1 Dermatomyositis is the only inflammatory myopathy that is characterized by presenting skin lesions, and since dermatological manifestations may be the first findings of the disease, they must be clearly and timely recognized.2 In the US, the estimated prevalence is 1–6 patients per 100,000 inhabitants.3 In Colombia, the incidence and prevalence are not known.

Dermatomyositis is considered a heterogeneous disease, not only due to its clinical presentation, but also because of its course and prognosis.4 In addition to the muscle and skin, it can involve different organs and systems, such as the heart, the gastrointestinal tract and the lungs, which makes it a diagnostic challenge.5 It can be associated with malignancy, and can occur concomitantly with other connective tissue diseases.4

Despite being classified within the rare diseases, it has a significant morbidity and mortality, which can be explained by its chronic and progressive course, with irreversible muscle damage. Until now, there are scarce data that allow to characterize the patients who suffer from dermatomyositis in Colombia, and in view of the importance of timely diagnosis and management, this work seeks to describe the main demographic characteristics, the dermatological and systemic manifestations, the immunological profile and the concomitance with malignancy and other connective tissue diseases, in a university hospital in Bogotá, Colombia.

Methods

It is a descriptive cross-sectional study that was conducted in a university hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. The study included patients with a diagnosis of dermatomyositis who met the Bohan and Peter classification criteria, during the period between January 2004 and December 2019.

The data were obtained from different information sources, including the electronic medical record system of the hospital, in which the ICD10 diagnostic codes associated with dermatomyositis ((M33: Dermatopolymyositis, M330: Juvenile dermatomyositis, M331: Other dermatomyositis, M332: Polymyositis and M339: Dermatopolymyositis, unspecified) were searched. In addition, the databases of the units of dermatology, rheumatology, dermatopathology, and electrophysiology of our hospital were used.

Clinical and paraclinical variables were evaluated, using summary measures in frequencies and percentages for the qualitative variables, as well as central tendency measures with means and dispersion for the quantitative variables, using in this case Microsoft Excel®.

The study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, with approval number 2019/207. The ethics committee considered that since it was a retrospective study, without specific intervention or risks for the patients, it did not require the signing of an informed consent.

ResultsGeneral demographic aspects

A total of 236 results were obtained, of which 63 patients met the Bohan and Peter classification criteria, and seven had a diagnosis of amyopathic dermatomyositis. Duplicate and erroneous numbers of clinical histories were excluded, as well as patients with an intra-institutional diagnosis of dermatomyositis, but with inadequate or incomplete registration of the information related to the variables of interest, in addition to patients with an extra-institutional diagnosis who did not have a report of diagnostic tests in the clinical history that would allow to confirm the diagnosis (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Sources of information used for the review of medical records and patients included.

(0.28MB).

The average age of diagnosis was 43 years (SD ± 15.3), 48 were women (68.5%), with a female:male ratio of 2.1:1. Of the total number of patients, 63 (90%) had dermatomyositis and 7 had amyopathic dermatomyositis (10%). Likewise, 59 (84.2%) patients required at least one hospitalization; on average, 1.9 hospitalizations (±2.4), with a hospital stay of 8.6 days (± 10.1) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics.

  Classic  Amyopathic  Total 
Number of patients, n (%)  63 (90)  7 (10)  70 
Age at diagnosis, years (SD)  43 (±15.3)  47 (±7.4)  43 (±15.3) 
Dermatomyositis in adults, n (%)  60 (85.7)  7 (10)  67 (95.7) 
Juvenile dermatomyositis, n (%)  3 (4.2)    3 (4.2) 
Gender       
Female, n (%)  43 (61.4)  7.1  48 (68.5) 
Male, n (%)  20 (28.5)  2.8  22 (31.4) 
Hospitalizations, n (%)  2.0 (±2.5)  0.8 (±0.3)  1.9 (±2.4), 
Hospital stay, days (SD)  8.6 (±10.3)  8.4 (±8.9)  8.6 (±10.1) 
Mortality, n (%)  5 (7.14)  –  5 (7.14) 

SD: standard deviation.

Clinical characteristics

Regarding the dermatological findings found in the patients with classic dermatomyositis, 63 (100%) patients presented pathognomonic manifestations,1,6 among which Gottron papules and heliotrope erythema were the most frequent, both findings being documented in 49 (77.7%) patients.

Forty (63.4%) patients presented characteristic manifestations. The V sign, which was the most frequent, was found in 30 (47.6%) of them. Compatible manifestations were documented in 51 (80.9%) patients, while 7 cases (11.1%) corresponded to infrequent manifestations, 10 (15.8%) to rare ones and 23 (36.5%) to nonspecific (Table 2).

Table 2.

Dermatological manifestations.

  Classic  Amyopathic 
Pathognomonic dermatological manifestations, n (%)     
Gottron papules  49 (77.7)  7 (100) 
Gottron’s sign  25 (39.6)  4 (57.1) 
Heliotrope erythema  49 (77.7)  6 (85.7) 
Characteristic dermatological manifestations, n (%)     
Periungual telangiectasia  17 (26.9)  3 (42.8) 
Periungual hypertrophy  16 (25.3)  2 (28.5) 
Hemorrhagic infarcts in the nail folds  1 (1.5)  1 (14.2) 
Shawl sign  19 (30.1)  2 (28.5) 
V sign  30 (47.6)  3 (42.8) 
Atrophic, scaly, erythematous plaques on the scalp  3 (4.7)  – 
Holster sign  11 (17.4)  1 (14.2) 
Compatible dermatological manifestations, n (%)     
Poikiloderma  47 (74.6)  6 (85.7) 
Periorbital and facial edema  19 (30.15)  1 (14.2) 
Infrequent dermatological manifestations, n (%)     
Epidermal vesico-blisters  1 (1.5)  – 
Necrotic lesions or superficial erosions  3 (4.7)  – 
Cutaneous vasculitis  3 (4.7)  – 
Calcinosis cutis  3 (4.7)  1 (14.2) 
Rare dermatological manifestations, n (%)     
Panniculitis  –  – 
Mucinosis  –  – 
Erythroderma  1 (1.5)  – 
Oral mucosal changes  1 (1.5)  – 
Flagellate erythema  –  – 
Mechanic’s hands  6 (9.5)  1 (14.2) 
Follicular hyperkeratosis  2 (3.1)  1 (14.2) 
Nonspecific dermatological manifestations, n (%)     
Raynaud’s phenomenon  10 (15.8)  1 (14.2) 
Pruritus  3 (4.7)  – 
Photosensitivity  14 (22.2)  2 (28.5) 
Source: classification according to the narrative reviews conducted by Mainetti et al.1 and DeWane et al.6

Among the systemic manifestations, 19 (30.15%) patients presented gastrointestinal manifestations, 12 (19.0%) pulmonary manifestations and 3 (4.7%) had cardiac manifestations. Of the 63 patients with classic dermatomyositis, 11 (17.4%) reported constitutional symptoms, 12 (19.0%) concomitantly presented other connective tissue diseases and 6 (9.5%) presented cancer, of which 3 were breast cancer, 2 lung cancer and one colorectal (Table 3).

Table 3.

Systemic manifestations.

  Classic  Amyopathic 
Pulmonary manifestations, n (%)     
Interstitial lung disease  8 (12.6)  – 
Aspiration pneumonia  2 (3.1)  – 
Pulmonary hypertension  6 (9.5)  – 
Alveolar hypoventilation  1 (1.5)  – 
Pneumothorax  –  – 
Pneumomediastinum  –  – 
Gastrointestinal manifestations, n (%)     
Dysphagia  15 (23.8)  – 
Gastroesophageal reflux  4 (6.34)  – 
Delayed gastric emptying  –  – 
Decreased intestinal motility  3 (4.7)  – 
Rectal incontinence  –  – 
Cardiac manifestations, n (%)     
Myocarditis  1 (1.5)  – 
Heart failure  –  – 
Conduction defects  –  – 
Pericarditis  –  – 
Valvular heart diseases  2 (3.1)  – 
Other systemic manifestations, n (%)     
Retinal vasculitis  –  – 
Acute kidney injury  –  – 
Involvement of the central nervous system secondary to vasculitis  –  – 
Constitutional symptoms, n (%)     
Fever  3 (4.7)  – 
Weight loss  11 (14.2)  3 (42.8) 
Association with malignancy, n (%)  6 (9.5)  – 
Association with connective tissue diseases, n (%)     
Systemic lupus erythematosus  5 (7.9)  – 
Scleroderma  6 (9.5)  – 
Sjögren’s syndrome  1 (1.5)  – 
Rheumatoid arthritis  1 (1.5)  – 
Laboratory tests

Skin biopsy was performed to 25 (39.6%) patients, of whom 15 presented findings compatible with dermatomyositis; 24 patients (38.0%) underwent muscle biopsy, 18 showed findings consistent with this inflammatory myopathy (skeletal muscle with chronic perimysial inflammation, atrophy of muscle fibers, and in some cases vacuolization) and one was nonspecific; 35 (55.5%) patients had an electromyography, 25 showed decreased amplitude and velocity of the motor potentials; fasciculation and fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves were evidenced in some cases, in addition to complex repetitive discharges. Seven patients had concomitantly muscle biopsy, skin biopsy and electromyography, and three of them presented findings suggestive of dermatomyositis in all the three examinations, of whom one presented only Gottron papules, other heliotrope erythema and poikiloderma, and the last one Gottron papules, heliotrope erythema, poikiloderma and photosensitivity. A chest CT scan was taken to 33 patients, seven had findings associated with the disease, among which it is worth highlighting interstitial infiltrates, bronchiectasis, pulmonary hypertension, fibrous tracts, organizing pneumonia, and interstitial pneumonia. An echocardiogram was taken to 16 patients, and six of them presented findings associated with this myopathy.

As for the immunology laboratory tests, the most frequently found was the antinuclear antibodies (ANA), in 41 (65.0%) patients, being the granular (53.6%) and homogeneous (21.9%) patterns the most documented. In the second place, there are the extractable nuclear antigens (ENA), which were positive in eight (12.6%) patients, being anti-Ro found in more occasions. Lastly, two (3.1%) patients had positive anti Jo-1.

Creatine kinase (CK) was requested to all patients, 50 (79.3%) presented an increase thereof (reference value: 55−170 U/l). Transaminases were requested to 61 patients, 40 (65.5%) had elevated ALT and 46 (75.4%) had elevated AST (reference value: ALT 14−54 U/l and AST 15−41 U/l). LDH was requested to 28 patients, 26 (92.8%) had it increased (reference value: 120−246 U/l), and of the 27 patients to whom aldolase was requested, it was elevated in 13 (48.1%) (reference value: 0−7.6 U/l). Regarding acute phase reactants, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was requested to 55 patients, which was positive in 46 (83.6%) cases (reference value: 0−20 mm/h), and C-reactive protein (CRP) was requested to 47 patients (reference value: less than 10 mg/l), which was positive in only five cases (10.6%). Of the total number of patients, five (7.9%) died from respiratory failure and one due to neurological causes (Table 4).

Table 4.

Diagnostic tests.

  ClassicAmyopathic
Type of exam  Tests performed  Positive tests  Tests performed  Positive tests 
Anti-Jo, n (%)  33 (52.3)  2 (6.0)  1 (14.2)  – 
Anti-Mi 2, n (%)  1 (1.5)  –  –  – 
ANA, n (%)  49 (77.7)  41 (83.6)  6 (85.7)  4 (57.1) 
Homogeneous, n (%)    9 (21.9)    1 (25) 
Peripheral, n (%)    –    – 
Nucleolar, n (%)    3 (7.3)    – 
Centromeric, n (%)    1 (2.4)    – 
Cytoplasmic, n (%)    2 (4.8)    3 (75) 
Granular, n (%)    22 (53.6)    – 
Ribosomal, n (%)    1 (2.4)     
Not specified, n (%)    3 (7.3)     
Anti-SM, n (%)  40  –  – 
Anti-RNP, n (%)  40  3 (7.5)  – 
Anti-La, n (%)  40  1 (2.5)  – 
Anti-Ro, n (%)  40  6 (15)  – 
Total CK -RV 55−170 U/l, n (%)  63  50 (79.3)  2 (28.5) 
ALT-RV 14−54 U/l, n (%)  61  40 (65.5)  3 (60) 
AST-RV 15−41 U/l, n (%)  61  46 (75.4)  3 (60) 
LDH-RV 120−246 U/l, n (%)  28  26 (92.8)  2 (100) 
Aldolase-RV 0−7,6 U/l, n (%)  27  13 (48.14)  – 
ESR-RV 0−20 mm/h, n (%)  55  46 (83.6)  – 
CRP-RV less than10 mg/ml, n (%)  47  5 (10.6)  – 
Electromyography, n (%)  35  25 (71.4)  –  – 
Skin biopsy, n (%)  25  15 (60)  7 (100) 
Muscle biopsy  24  18 (75)  – 
Chest CT scan  33  7 (21.2)  – 
Echocardiogram  16  6 (35.7)  –  – 

ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ANA: antinuclear antibodies; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK: creatine kinase; LDH: lactic dehydrogenase; CRP: C-reactive protein; CAT: computed axial tomography; RV: reference value; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Treatment

Sixty (95.2%) patients received management with glucocorticoids, 30 (50%) required pulses of methylprednisolone and continued with oral prednisolone, while 30 (47.6%) received only oral prednisolone. Regarding immunomodulators, the most frequently used were azathioprine, in 35 patients (64.8%); methotrexate in 27 (50%); and cyclophosphamide in 11 (20.3%) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Treatment.

  Classic  Amyopathic  Total 
Corticosteroids, n (%)  60 (95.2)  4 (57.1)  64 (92.8) 
Methylprednisolone, n (%)  30 (50)  1 (25)  31 (52.5) 
Deflazacort, n (%)  2 (3.3)  –  2 (2.8) 
Prednisolone, n (%)  60 (100)  4 (100)  64 (91.4) 
Immunomodulators, n (%)  54 (85.7)  4 (57.1)  58 (82.8) 
Azathioprine, n (%)  35 (64.8)  1 (25)  36 (51.4) 
Methotrexate, n (%)  27 (50)  2 (50)  29 (41.4) 
Cyclophosphamide, n (%)  11 (20.3)  –  11 (15.7) 
Gamma globulin, n (%)  8 (14.8)  –  8 (11.4) 
Chloroquine, n (%)  5 (9.2)  1 (25)  6 (8.5) 
Rituximab, n (%)  4 (7.4)  –  4 (5.71) 
Cyclosporine, n (%)  3 (5.5)  –  3 (4.28) 
Mycophenolate, n (%)  2 (3.7)  –  2 (2.8) 
Tofacitinib, n (%)  1 (1.8)  –  1 (1.4) 
One immunomodulator, n (%)  27 (42.8)  4 (57.1)  31 (53) 
≥2 immunomodulators, n (%)  27 (42.8)  27 (46) 
Discussion

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases that affect the musculoskeletal system and are usually accompanied by extramuscular involvement, due to interstitial lung disease, arthritis, or malignancy.7 They are divided into dermatomyositis, polymyositis, inclusion body myositis, and other myositis, including eosinophilic, granulomatous, focal nodular, infectious, drug-induced, orbital, macrophagic myofascitis, myositis ossificans, hereditary myopathies associated with muscle inflammation and immune-mediated necrotizing myositis, among others.1

The classic form of dermatomyositis is characterized by the presence of symmetric proximal muscle weakness and dermatological manifestations; however, there is a variety in which muscle weakness is absent, known as amyopathic dermatomyositis,7 which occurs in between 10 and 20% of the patients.8 A study published in Italy in 2014, which included 103 patients with dermatomyositis, documented the amyopathic variant in 7.7% of patients; when comparing the age at onset of the disease, the authors evidenced that those with amyopathic dermatomyositis were younger at the time of diagnosis.9 In our study, it was reported a percentage of amyopathic dermatomyositis in accordance with the reports in the literature; however, contrary to the study mentioned above, these patients were older at diagnosis, compared with those with classic dermatomyositis.

Two incidence peaks of dermatomyositis have been described, the first between 5 and 15 years of age and the second between 40 and 60 years of age. It is considered that this is a disease that predominates in women, with a female:male ratio of 2:1.1 As for the demographic characteristics, in our study the mean age at diagnosis was similar to that reported in another study, published in 2012, which was conducted in Brazil and included 139 patients, in which it was reported an average age at the time of diagnosis of 41.7 years (SD ± 14.1). Similar findings have been published in other countries, such as Japan, 47.4 years; Mexico, 34 years (SD ± 15); France, 52 years; and Malaysia, 57.8 years (SD ± 11.1).10–14 In addition, we evidenced a predominance of the disease in women, which coincides with what has been reported so far in studies carried out in Singapore, Mexico, France, Taiwan and Japan.11–13,15,16 In Colombia, a study similar to ours was carried out in 2014, which included 30 patients with dermatomyositis and 16 with polymyositis, with a slightly higher female:male ratio.17

Regarding the dermatological manifestations, it has been described in several studies that heliotrope erythema and Gottron papules are the most frequent signs, which is consistent with our results.10,16,18,19 The percentages of frequency of periungual telangiectasia and calcinosis cutis tend to be similar to those reported by us, as well as in the study published by De Souza et al.10 in Brazil, with 6.5% of patients with calcinosis cutis, and in the study conducted by Sato et al.,18 also in Brazil, with 5.3% of the patients with calcinosis cutis and 38.2% with periungual telangiectasia. However, in our study, the patients presented less photosensitivity (22.2%) and holster sign (17.4%), in addition to higher frequency of the shawl sign (30.1%) and the V sign (47.6%) with respect to what was published by De Souza et al.10 in Brazil, with 15.1% of the patients with the V sign and 14.4% with the shawl sign; by Sato et al.,18 also in Brazil, with 50.6% of the patients with photosensitivity; by Vega et al.17 in Colombia, with the shawl sign in 16% of the patients and the holster sign in 26.6%; in addition to what was published by Hoesly et al.20 in the US, with 22.1% of the patients with the shawl sign.

With regard to systemic manifestations and constitutional symptoms, dysphagia, interstitial lung disease and weight loss were the most frequent. In a European study published in 2011, interstitial lung disease was documented twice as frequently as that was found in the present study, in addition to higher associated morbidity and mortality in these patients.21 several studies coincide in that gastrointestinal and pulmonary manifestations, and weight loss are the more prevalent. 18,20,22,23

As part of the variables studied, elevation of at least one of the muscle enzymes was documented in 85% of the patients, a value lower than that found in other studies.14,18 Within muscle enzymes, CK is the one that is most frequently elevated, the other results are variable in different articles.13,15,19 Generally, transaminases are elevated in similar proportions, with AST usually being higher than ALT.13,23

ANAs were positive, with a lower percentage than ours, in three Brazilian studies: the first, published by De Souza et al.,10 which included 139 patients with dermatomyositis, of whom 62.6% had positive ANAs; the second, by Sato et al.,18 which included 189 patients with juvenile dermatomyositis, of whom 41.4% had positive ANAs and, finally, a study conducted by Sallum et al.,24 which included 39 patients with juvenile dermatomyositis, of whom 40% presented positive ANAs.10,18,24 Several articles have documented a higher frequency of granular and homogeneous fluorescence pattern, which is consistent with our results.10,17

Unlike the results of a Brazilian study published in 2009, which reported findings suggestive of dermatomyositis in 93.2% of electromyographies, 91.5% of muscle biopsies, and 77.3% of skin biopsies18 we found a lower proportion of electromyographies (71.4%), which is consistent with a study conducted in Singapore, in which 79.4% of patients with electromyiographies were reported.15

As for the treatment, 95.2% of our patients were managed with oral or intravenous glucocorticoids; similar proportions have been documented so far in Asia, Mexico and Brazil.10,11,13,14 With reference to maintenance therapy, most of the patients in our study received at least one immunomodulator; among the immunomodulators, the most frequently used, according to a study carried out in Brazil that included 139 patients, are azathioprine and methotrexate,10 which coincides with our results.

In our study, concomitant connective tissue diseases were evidenced in 17% of the patients, which is consistent with data documented in Asia.15 Most of the concomitant diseases were lupus and systemic sclerosis; until now, no studies have been documented showing these two entities predominantly, however, in a study conducted in Brazil, published in the year 2000, which included 59 patients with dermatomyositis and 43 patients with polymyositis, in the group of patients with dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis was documented in seven patients and rheumatoid arthritis in one.22 In addition, in a study published in Singapore, which included 40 patients with dermatomyositis and 35 with polymyositis, 10 of them presented association with systemic lupus erythematosus, four with rheumatoid arthritis, and one with systemic sclerosis; in total, 21.4% of the patients concomitantly presented another connective tissue disease. Finally, in the study published by Sato et al., which included 189 patients, eight presented rheumatoid arthritis, two presented systemic lupus erythematosus, and one had systemic sclerosis.15,18

It is estimated that approximately 15% of patients with dermatomyositis diagnosed after the age of 40 years will present a neoplasm three to five years after the diagnosis, the most common being colorectal, ovarian, lung, pancreatic, and gastric carcinomas.25 In a study conducted in Stockholm, Sweden, published in 1992, which included 392 patients with dermatomyositis, a relative risk of cancer of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.6–3.6) was documented in men and of 3.4 (95% CI: 2.4–4.7) in women.26 Our study found a percentage of patients with cancer similar to that reported in the studies conducted by Scola et al.22 in Brazil (8.4%) and by Chen et al.23 in China (11.1%). In contrast, other studies have reported higher percentages of malignancy, such as those of Hiketa et al.13 in Japan (16.5%), Fardet et al.12 in France (23%) and Hoesly et al.20 in the US. (23%).

With regard to mortality, in a study published in 2018, which included 982 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of dermatomyositis and polymyositis in China, it was documented the death of 63 of them during hospitalization or two weeks after discharge, with a calculated mortality rate of 6.4%, being pulmonary infection and exacerbation of interstitial lung disease27 the two most frequent causes of death, which resembles our results. However, in a retrospective study conducted in the US, which included 15,407 patients (10,023 with a diagnosis of dermatomyositis and 5384 with polymyositis), a mortality rate of 4.4% was found in the group diagnosed with dermatomyositis (449 deaths), a percentage lower than ours.28

Given that our study collected the data retrospectively, within the limitations it is important to mention that it was not possible to obtain follow-up data, in order to determine the prognosis of the patients. Data were taken from electronic medical records, which may limit their collection, especially those which make reference to clinical characteristics. Not all patients underwent the same paraclinical tests, however, it is a reflection of the clinical practice, in which the request for diagnostic tests is related to the clinical picture of the patients. Finally, it should be noted that this is so far the study with the largest number of patients with dermatomyositis in Colombia.

Conclusion

The main demographic characteristics, and dermatological and systemic manifestations of a group of patients with dermatomyositis in a university hospital in Colombia are presented. The majority of the data obtained are consistent with information from other case series studies worldwide. Despite the fact that heliotrope erythema, Gottron papules, and Gottron's sign have been defined as pathognomonic manifestations, in accordance with what was proposed in the narrative reviews by Mainetti et al. and DeWane et al.,1,6 in our study we found that the most frequent manifestations were Gottron papules, heliotrope erythema and poikiloderma. The population evaluated presented a lower proportion of photosensitivity and holster sign, in addition to a higher frequency of the shawl sign and the V sign, compared with other studies.

Ethical approval

Approval by the Institutional Research and Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana – Code 2019/207 – Record Number 18/2019.

Funding

The authors declare that they have not received any funding for the realization of this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest for the preparation of this article.

References
[1]
C. Mainetti, B. Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli, C. Selmi.
Cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis: a comprehensive review.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 53 (2017), pp. 337-356
[2]
J.P. Restrepo, L.F. Medina, M.D.P. Molina.
Manifestaciones cutáneas de la dermatomiositis.
[3]
J. Schmidt.
Current classification and management of inflammatory myopathies.
J Neuromuscul Dis, 5 (2018), pp. 109-129
[4]
L.A. Dourmishev.
Inflammatory myopathies with cutaneous involvement: from diagnosis to therapy.
Folia Med (Plovdiv), 59 (2017), pp. 7-13
[5]
W.M. Yang, J.J. Chen.
Advances in biomarkers for dermatomyositis.
Clin Chim Acta, 482 (2018), pp. 172-177
[6]
M.E. DeWane, R. Waldman, J. Lu.
Dermatomyositis: clinical features and pathogenesis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 82 (2020), pp. 267-281
[7]
H. Sasaki, H. Kohsaka.
Current diagnosis and treatment of polymyositis and dermatomyositis.
Mod Rheumatol, 28 (2018), pp. 913-921
[8]
V. Isak, J.L. Jorizzo.
Recent developments on treatment strategies and the prognosis of dermatomyositis: a review.
J Dermatolog Treat, 29 (2018), pp. 450-459
[9]
R. Neri, S. Barsotti, V. Iacopetti, A. Tripoli, A. D’ascanio, A.G. Tavoni, et al.
Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis: analysis of a monocentric cohort.
J Clin Neuromuscul Dis, 15 (2014), pp. 157-160
[10]
F.H.C. de Souza, T.B.M. Barros, M. Levy-Neto, S.K. Shinjo.
Adult dermatomyositis: experience of a Brazilian tertiary care center.
Rev Bras Reumatol, 52 (2012), pp. 897-902
[11]
B. Lopez, B. Cacho, R. Orozco, K. Archer.
Dermatomyositis: cutaneous features, clinical course, and association with malignancies in 73 patients in a Hispanic population.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 2515 (2009),
[12]
L. Fardet, A. Dupuy, M. Gain, A. Kettaneh, P. Ch̃rin, H. Bachelez, et al.
Factors associated with underlying malignancy in a retrospective cohort of 121 patients with dermatomyositis.
Medicine (Baltimore), 88 (2009), pp. 91-97
[13]
T. Hiketa, Y. Matsumoto, M. Ohashi, R. Sasaki.
Juvenile dermatomyositis: a statistical study of 114 patients with dermatomyositis.
[14]
C.L. Teh, J.S. Wong, H.H. Soo.
Polymyositis and dermatomyositis in Sarawak: a profile of patients treated in the Sarawak general hospital.
Rheumatol Int, 32 (2012), pp. 265-268
[15]
E.T. Koh, A. Seow, B. Ong, P. Ratnagopal, H. Tjia, H.H. Chng.
Adult onset polymyositis/dermatomyositis: clinical and laboratory features and treatment response in 75 patients.
Ann Rheum Dis, 52 (1993), pp. 857-861
[16]
C. Sun, J.H. Lee, Y.H. Yang, H.H. Yu, L.C. Wang, Y.T. Lin, et al.
Juvenile dermatomyositis: a 20-year retrospective analysis of treatment and clinical outcomes.
Pediatr Neonatol, 56 (2015), pp. 31-39
[17]
K. Vega Castro.
Descripción de los anticuerpos, y manifestaciones clínicas de pacientes con polimiositis y dermatomiositis.
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina Interna, (2014),
[18]
J.D.O. Sato, A.M.E. Sallum, V.P.L. Ferriani, R. Marini, S.B. Sacchetti, E.M. Okuda, et al.
A Brazilian registry of juvenile dermatomyositis: onset features and classification of 189 cases.
Clin Exp Rheumatol, 27 (2009), pp. 1031-1038
[19]
M. Caggiani, R. Guariglia, R. Jurado, J. Cameto.
Dermatomiositis juvenil: experiencia de 13 años en un hospital de atención terciaria. Análisis de 17 casos clínicos.
Arch Pediatr Urug, 89 (2018), pp. 99-107
[20]
P.M. Hoesly, J.C. Sluzevich, A. Jambusaria-Pahlajani, E.R. Lesser, M.G. Heckman, A. Abril.
Association of antinuclear antibody status with clinical features and malignancy risk in adult-onset dermatomyositis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 80 (2019), pp. 1364-1370
[21]
I. Marie, P.Y. Hatron, S. Dominique, P. Cherin, L. Mouthon, J.F. Menard.
Short-term and long-term outcomes of interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a series of 107 patients.
Arthritis Rheum, 63 (2011), pp. 3439-3447
[22]
R.H. Scola, L.C. Werneck, D. Monte Serrat Prevedello, E.L. Toderke, F.M. Iwamoto.
Diagnosis of dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a study of 102 cases.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 58 (2000), pp. 789-799
[23]
P. Chen, J. Xie, R. Xiao, G. Zhang, X. Qiu, Y. Zhan.
Clinical analysis for 108 cases of dermatomyositis.
J Cent South Univ (Medical Sci), 44 (2019), pp. 1157-1162
[24]
A.M.E. Sallum, M.H.B. Kiss, S. Sachetti, M.B.D. Resende, K.C. Moutinho, M. De Souza Carvalho, et al.
Juvenile dermatomyositis: Clinical, laboratorial, histological, therapeutical and evolutive parameters of 35 patients.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 60 (2002), pp. 889-899
[25]
D.E. Mandel, C.J. Malemud, A.D. Askari.
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a review of the classification and impact of pathogenesis.
Int J Mol Sci, 18 (2017),
[26]
B. Sigurgeirsson, B. Lindelöf, O. Edhag, E. Allander.
Risk of cancer in patients with dermatomyositis or polymyositis. A population-based study.
N Engl J Med, 326 (1992), pp. 363-367
[27]
C. Wu, Q. Wang, L. He, E. Yang, X. Zeng.
Hospitalization mortality and associated risk factors in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a retrospective case-control study.
[28]
S.G. Murray, G. Schmajuk, L. Trupin, E. Lawson, M. Cascino, J. Barton, et al.
A population-based study of infection-related hospital mortality in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 67 (2015), pp. 673-680
Copyright © 2021. Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología
Download PDF
Article options