covid
Buscar en
Revista del Pie y Tobillo
Toda la web
Inicio Revista del Pie y Tobillo Prótesis de tobillo Ramsés. Conclusiones después de 5 años
Journal Information
Vol. 25. Issue 2.
Pages 6-11 (December 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 25. Issue 2.
Pages 6-11 (December 2011)
Open Access
Prótesis de tobillo Ramsés. Conclusiones después de 5 años
Total ankle replacement with ramses prosthesis. conclusions after five years
Visits
1910
J.E. Galeote Rodríguez
Corresponding author
egaleoter@gmail.com

Correspondencia: Unidad de Pie y Tobillo. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. c/ Fernando el Católico, 69. 28015 Madrid
, J.L. Tomé Delgado, A. Chaos Lambea, L. López-Durán Stern
Unidad de Pie y Tobillo. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Madrid
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information

La prótesis es la principal alternativa a la artrodesis en las patologías graves de tobillo y se están publicando buenos resultados a medio plazo, comparables a los de rodilla o cadera.

Se presenta una revisión retrospectiva de los primeros 16 casos en 15 pacientes con la prótesis de tobillo Ramsés.

El seguimiento medio ha sido de 40 meses. Se retiró un implante de los 16, por lo que la supervivencia es del 93%. La puntuación de la escala AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score) pasó de 38 a 60. La movilidad plantar fue de 15°, sin mejoría en la dorsal.

Radiológicamente, se observó radiotransparencia precoz en el componente tibial, sin progresión significativa. No hubo hundimientos del componente astragalino. Los ejes no sufrieron grandes cambios. Dos casos presentan signos de desimplantación completa.

No ha habido complicaciones relevantes. Un 80% de los pacientes se ha mostrado satisfecho con el procedimiento.

Conclusión

Los resultados de estos primeros casos de prótesis de tobillo Ramsés pueden considerarse aceptables desde el punto de vista clínico y funcional, con pocas complicaciones relevantes.

Los resultados radiológicos plantean interrogantes sobre la supervivencia de los implantes a largo plazo.

Palabras clave:
Artroplastia de tobillo
Prótesis Ramsés

Total ankle replacement is the main option versus ankle fusion in severe ankle pathologies and there are many publications showing good results in the medium term, with implant survival rates similar to knee or hip prosthesis.

We present a retrospective review about our first 16 cases in 15 patients with a Ramses total ankle replacement.

Medium follow-up was 40 months. Only one implant has been removed; therefore survival rate is 93%. AOFAS average score raised from 38 to 60. Medium plantar flexion was 15° with no improvement in dorsal flexion.

With X-ray we register early radiolucent lines in tibial component with no progression signs. No talar component subsidence was registered. No changes in axial alignement. Two cases present severe loosening.

We had no severe complications. 80% of patients declared to be satisfied with the procedure.

Conclusion

Clinical and functional results of these first Ramses total ankle replacements are satisfactory and without outstanding complications. Radiological results make us question how will the implant survival rates be in the long term.

Key words:
Ankle replacement
Ramses prosthesis
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
A.S. Unger, A.E. Inglis, C.S. Mow, H.E. Figgie 3rd..
Total ankle arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study.
Foot Ankle, 8 (1988), pp. 173-179
[2.]
H.B. Kitaoka, G.L. Patzer.
Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78 (1996), pp. 1658-1664
[3.]
S.E. Newton 3rd..
Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of fifty cases.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64 (1982), pp. 104-111
[4.]
D.L. Hamblen.
Can the ankle joint be replaced?.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 67 (1985), pp. 689-690
[5.]
M.T. Pyevich, C.L. Saltzman, J.J. Callaghan, F.G. Alvine.
Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80 (1998), pp. 1410-1420
[6.]
S.I. Knecht, M. Estin, J.J. Callaghan, M.B. Zimmerman, K.J. Alliman, F.J. Alvine, L. Saltzman.
The Agility total ankle arthroplasty. Seven to sixteen-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86–A (2004), pp. 1161-1171
[7.]
P.L. Wood, S. Deakin.
Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 85 (2003), pp. 334-341
[8.]
J.K. Deorio, M.E. Easley.
Total ankle arthroplasty.
Instr Course Lect, 57 (2008), pp. 383-413
[9.]
H.B. Kitaoka, I.J. Alexander, R.S. Adelaar, J.A. Nunley, M.S. Myerson, M. Sanders.
Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hind-foot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes.
Foot Ankle Int, 15 (1994), pp. 349-353
[10.]
G. Mendolia, and the TALUS group.
The Ramses ankle replacement: design-surgical technique result, results in first 38 cases.
Maîtrise Orthopédique, 21 (2002), pp. 100-105
[11.]
M. Nuñez Samper, M.N. Kubba.
Protesis de tobillo Ramses: indicaciones y técnica de implantación.
Pie y Tobillo, 19 (2005), pp. 51-58
[12.]
C. Adam, F. Eckstein, S. Mitz, R. Putz.
The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals.
J Anat, 193 (1998), pp. 203-214
[13.]
R.H. Thomas, T.R. Daniels.
Ankle arthritis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85–A (2003), pp. 923-936
[14.]
U. Lindsjo.
Operative treatment of ankle fracture dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases.
Clin Orthop, 199 (1985), pp. 28-38
[15.]
C. Frey, N.M. Halikus, T. Vu-Rose, E. Ebramzadeh.
A review of ankle arthrodesis.
Predisposing factors to no union. Foot Ankle Int, 15 (1994), pp. 581-584
[16.]
R.N. Stauffer, N.M. Segal.
Total ankle arthroplasty.
Four years’ experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (1981), pp. 217-221
[17.]
T. Anderson, F. Montgomery, A. Carlsson.
Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A (2003), pp. 1321-1329
[18.]
H. Kofoed, T.S. Sørensen.
Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80 (1998), pp. 328-332
[19.]
P.L.R. Wood, H. Prem, C. Sutton.
Total ankle replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90 (2008), pp. 605-609
[20.]
H.C. Doets, R. Brand, R.G. Nelissen.
Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88 (2006), pp. 1272-1284
[21.]
N.C. Jensen, F. Linde.
Long term follow-up on 33 TPR ankle joint replacements in 26 patients with reumathoid arthritis.
Foot Ankle Surg, 15 (2009), pp. 123-126
[22.]
R. Larrainzar.
Artrodesis frente a prótesis total de tobillo; reflexiones sobre la evidencia disponible.
Pie y Tobillo, 22 (2008), pp. 79-84
[23.]
O. Jardé, A. Gabrion, P. Meire, J.L. Trinquier-Lautard, P. Vives.
Complications and failures of total ankle prosthesis. A propos of 21 cases.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 83 (1997), pp. 645-651
[24.]
F. Álvarez-Goenaga.
Artroplastia total de tobillo.
Primeros 25 casos. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, 52 (2008), pp. 224-232
[25.]
P.L.R. Wood, M.T. Karski, P. Wathmough.
Total ankle replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92 (2010), pp. 958-962
[26.]
H. Koivu, I. Kohonen, E. Sipola, K. Alanen, T. Vahlberg, H. Tiu-sanen.
Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the Ankle Evolutive System total ankle replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91 (2009), pp. 907-914
[27.]
A.A. Spirt, M. Assal, S.T. Hansen Jr..
Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A (2004), pp. 1172-1178
[28.]
S.S. Morgan, B. Brooke, N.J. Harris.
Total ankle replacement by the Ankle Evolution System: medium-term outcome.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92 (2010), pp. 61-65
[29.]
A. Barg, M. Knupp, B. Hintermann.
Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total ankle replacement: a patient-based comparison of pain relief, quality of life and functional outcome.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92 (2010), pp. 1659-1663
[30.]
N. Gougoulias, A. Khanna, N. Maffulli.
How successful are current ankle replacements?. A systematic review of the literature.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468 (2010), pp. 199-208
[31.]
W.C. McGarvey, T.O. Clanton, D. Lunz.
Malleolar fracture after total ankle arthroplasty: a comparison of two designs.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (2004), pp. 104-110
[32.]
B.S. Kim, W.J. Choi, I.S. Kim, J.W. Lee.
Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91 (2009), pp. 1183-1190
[33.]
S.A. Hobson, A. Karantana, S. Dhar.
Total ankle replacement in patients with significant preoperative deformity of the hind-foot.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91 (2009), pp. 481-486
[34.]
S.M. Raikin, J. Kane, M.E. Ciminiello.
Risk factors for incision-healing complications following total ankle arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92 (2010), pp. 2150-2155
[35.]
P. Hopgood, R. Kumar, P.L. Wood.
Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88 (2006), pp. 1032-1038
[36.]
R. Kotnis, C. Pasapula, F. Anwar, P.H. Cooke, R.J. Sharp.
The management of failed ankle replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88 (2006), pp. 1039-1047
[37.]
P. Culpan, V. Le Strat, P. Piriou, T. Judet.
Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89 (2007), pp. 1178-1183
[38.]
A. Kumar, S. Dhar.
Total ankle replacement: early results during learning period.
Foot Ankle Surg, 13 (2007), pp. 19-23

Trabajo presentado por los mismos autores en el XXXII Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Medicina y Cirugía de Pie y Tobillo en abril de 2010 (Sevilla)

Copyright © 2011. SEMCPT. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.
Download PDF
Article options