was read the article
array:23 [ "pii" => "S1988885616300360" "issn" => "19888856" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2016.06.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-09-01" "aid" => "623" "copyright" => "SECOT" "copyrightAnyo" => "2016" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2016;60:271-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 1 "PDF" => 1 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1888441516300455" "issn" => "18884415" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2016.06.005" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-09-01" "aid" => "623" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2016;60:271-8" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 242 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 182 "PDF" => 60 ] ] "es" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original</span>" "titulo" => "Fracturas periprotésicas de fémur sobre prótesis de cadera y rodilla. Análisis de una serie de 34 casos y revisión de las series españolas en los últimos 20 años" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "271" "paginaFinal" => "278" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures of hip or knee arthroplasty. Analysis of 34 cases and a review of Spanish series in the last 20 years" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "M. Gracia-Ochoa, I. Miranda, S. Orenga, V. Hurtado-Oliver, F. Sendra, A. Roselló-Añón" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Gracia-Ochoa" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Miranda" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "Orenga" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "V." "apellidos" => "Hurtado-Oliver" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Sendra" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Roselló-Añón" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1988885616300360" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2016.06.003" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885616300360?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441516300455?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/18884415/0000006000000005/v1_201608210056/S1888441516300455/v1_201608210056/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1988885616300347" "issn" => "19888856" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recote.2016.08.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2016-09-01" "aid" => "622" "copyright" => "SECOT" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2016;60:279-85" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 1 "HTML" => 1 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Is the Dresden technique a mechanical design of choice suitable for the repair of middle third Achilles tendon ruptures? A biomechanical study" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "279" "paginaFinal" => "285" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "¿Es la técnica Dresden un diseño mecánico de elección apropiado para la reparación de roturas de tercio medio del tendón de Aquiles? Ensayo biomecánico Dresden technique" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 410 "Ancho" => 2531 "Tamanyo" => 58754 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Mechanical failure of the repairs. (A) Tendon tearing with the Dresden technique. (B) Rupture of the suture with the Kessler technique.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "C. de la Fuente, G. Carreño-Zillmann, H. Marambio, H. Henríquez" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "de la Fuente" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "G." "apellidos" => "Carreño-Zillmann" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Marambio" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "H." "apellidos" => "Henríquez" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1888441516300443" "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2016.06.004" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1888441516300443?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885616300347?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/19888856/0000006000000005/v1_201608210033/S1988885616300347/v1_201608210033/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:19 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures of hip or knee arthroplasty. Analysis of 34 cases and a review of Spanish series in the last 20 years" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "271" "paginaFinal" => "278" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "M. Gracia-Ochoa, I. Miranda, S. Orenga, V. Hurtado-Oliver, F. Sendra, A. Roselló-Añón" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Gracia-Ochoa" ] 1 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Miranda" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "nachomigo@hotmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "S." "apellidos" => "Orenga" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "V." "apellidos" => "Hurtado-Oliver" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "F." "apellidos" => "Sendra" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Roselló-Añón" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Francesc de Borja, Gandía, Valencia, Spain" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas periprotésicas de fémur sobre prótesis de cadera y rodilla. Análisis de una serie de 34 casos y revisión de las series españolas en los últimos 20 años" ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures are increasingly common due to the increasing number of arthroplasties being performed in older patients, which also results in a greater number of revision arthroscopies that in turn carry a greater risk of peri-prosthetic fracture.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2</span></a> Depending on the series, the incidence of peri-prosthetic femoral fracture around total hip arthroplasty or revision arthroplasties varies between 0.3% and 18%.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2–4</span></a> An incidence has been described of supracondylar femoral fractures varying between 0.3% and 2.5%, increasing to 1.6–38% in revision arthroplasties.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3–10</span></a></p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Treatment of these fractures is complex and highly challenging because, in addition to the difficulty of the fracture itself, there are the disadvantages of a prior implant which affects the treatment, the poor bone quality of these patients and frequent comorbidity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,5</span></a> In some cases, depending on the patient's general condition and the type of fracture, the treatment of choice is conservative, although most cases require surgical treatment. In peri-prosthetic hip fractures various elements can be used for osteosynthesis (plates, screws, cerclages) and/or a revision stem (short or long), with the use or otherwise of different types of graft. The decision regarding treatment for hip fractures is usually based on the Vancouver classification system.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0205"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11–13</span></a> Supracondylar femoral fractures around a total knee prosthesis can be osteosynthesised by intramedullary nailing or osteosynthesis with a plate. Depending on the type of fracture and the condition of the prosthesis, the prosthesis could be changed for a tumoral prosthesis or a revision prosthesis, and the use of various types of bone graft could be considered.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,5,14</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Peri-prosthetic fractures are a serious complication and generally have poor outcomes, a reoperation rate of 7–23%, a complication rate that in some series exceeds 50%, and a very high mortality rate.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,15</span></a> Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures have a devastating effect on the patient's quality of life, they pose a therapeutic challenge and also have an extremely high financial cost.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,16</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The objective of this study was to assess the cases of peri-prosthetic femoral fractures treated in our centre and to analyse the type of patients that suffer these fractures, the treatment given and the outcomes achieved and compare them with Spanish series published over the last 20 years.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Methods</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A retrospective, observational and longitudinal study of the 34 peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (in 33 patients) attended in our centre between 2010 and 2014. Fractures produced intraoperatively were rejected.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The data analysed were taken from the patients’ clinical history. The epidemiological characteristics, previous comorbidity, the time between the arthroplasty and developing the fracture, the type of arthroplasty around which the fracture occurred, the treatment given (and if necessary, the type of osteosynthesis used), the days of hospital stay and whether the patients required a blood transfusion were noted. The treatment given to each of the patients was decided from the clinical session study of each of the fractures and each patient, the surgeon in charge making the definitive decision in each case, taking into account the observations from the clinical session. The data pertaining to follow-up were gathered, any complications that occurred, the fracture consolidation time, reoperations, whether there was a death and how long after the fracture, the time from discharge and the follow-up time. The functional status before the fracture was noted and the functional status after the fracture (the functional status) was classified into 5 subtypes: (1) bed-bound, (2) using a wheelchair, (3) walking with a frame or with 2 crutches, (4) walking with a stick or a crutch, and (5) walking unaided. All the patients who were alive at the time the study was performed were given a telephone survey (which the patients themselves completed or a family member if the patient was not in a condition to speak on the telephone or hold a conversation). The telephone survey completed the data regarding the pre and post fracture functional status which did not appear in the clinical history, and data regarding pain and degree of satisfaction with the treatment were also gathered.</p><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Statistical analysis</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The data was handled anonymously and confidentially, and gathered on a database created using Microsoft Excel 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics 22 was used for the statistical analysis. This comprised a descriptive analysis of the variables, calculating the distribution of frequencies for the qualitative variables and the arithmetic mean, and the standard error of the mean for the quantitative variables. The values obtained for the different parameters studied between the group of subjects treated surgically and the group of subjects treated orthopedically were compared using the Student's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>-test two-tail (quantitative variables) or with the Chi squared test (qualitative variables), and these 2 tests were also used to compare the group of peri-prosthetic knee fractures and the group of peri-prosthetic hip fractures. The functional status before and after the peri-prosthetic fracture was compared using the Student's <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>-test for paired samples.</p></span></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Results</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We analysed 34 peri-prosthetic femoral fractures in 33 patients (27 females and 6 males), 20 around a hip prosthesis and 14 around a knee prosthesis. Of the knee prostheses around which the fractures occurred, 12 were primary knee arthroplasties and 2 revision arthroplasties; of the hip prostheses, 12 were primary total hip arthroplasties, 7 partial hip arthroplasties (with cemented stem) and one revision total hip arthroplasty. All the peri-prosthetic knee fractures were supracondylar. The peri-prosthetic hip fractures were classified according to the Vancouver system (the classification made on admission and used to decide the treatment was noted): 2 type AL fractures, 2 type AG, 6 type B1, 8 type B2 and 2 type C. No type B3 peri-prosthetic hip fractures were treated. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a> shows the differentiated data according to the treatment given (surgical or conservative) and the site of the initial prosthesis (hip or knee).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The mean age at which the fracture occurred was 79.9 (range 61–93) years. On average, the fracture occurred 60 months after the arthroplasty (range 4 days to 14 years), the mean age at which the arthroscopy was performed being 74.1 (range 57–84) years. Ninety-one percent of the patients had a prior comorbidity and up to 36% had at least 3 previous systemic diseases. Seventy-six percent had high blood pressure, 36% dyslipidaemia, 27% diabetes mellitus, and 18% heart disease of some type.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">26 cases (76.5%) underwent surgery and 8 (23.5%) were treated conservatively. Of the 14 supracondylar peri-prosthetic knee fractures, 4 (28.6%) were treated orthopedically and 10 (71.4%) surgically. The surgical treatment chosen was osteosynthesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail in 7 cases and osteosynthesis with plate in the other 3 cases. Of the 20 peri-prosthetic hip fractures, 4 (20%) were treated conservatively (one type AG, 2 type B1 – subsequently one was rescued with surgical treatment with cerclages due to subsidence of the stem – and one type B2). The other 16 (80%) peri-prosthetic hip fractures were treated surgically from the start: the 2 type AL fractures were osteosynthesised with cerclages; in one type AG fracture the greater trochanter was reinserted using a suture; one type B1 fracture was osteosynthesised with cerclages and in another case underwent osteosynthesis with plate and cerclages, the stem was changed and cerclages placed in another 2 cases; in most of the 7 type B2 fractures that were treated surgically a change of stem and cerclages was chosen (6 cases) and osteosynthesis with plate in only one case; the 2 type C fractures were treated surgically, one was osteosynthesised with a plate and cerclages and the stem was changed for a longer one in the other case. The mean overall hospital stay was 8.7 days, and was significantly longer (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01) in the patients treated surgically than in the orthopaedic patients (10.1 vs. 4.4, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>). Fifty-nine percent of the patients required blood transfusion in the days after the fracture or the operation; blood loss in the patients treated surgically was significantly greater (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.05), as only 25% of the patients who were treated conservatively needed a blood transfusion and up to 69% of the operated patients required at least one blood transfusion (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>).</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Up to 60.6% of the patients presented complications. Thirty-five percent of the complications were mild (dysmetria, delayed consolidation, resolved neuritis of the EPS, etc.) and 65% were serious complications (dislocation of the prosthesis – 2 cases, infection – 4 cases, pseudoarthrosis – 3 cases, loosening of the prosthetic parts – 3 cases, refracture, etc.). Complications occurred in 50% of the patients treated orthopedically and in 61.5% of those treated surgically. Despite the high number of complications, only 3 patients required reoperation (one twice and the other on 3 occasions) and one of the patients treated orthopedically developed a pseudoarthrosis and had to be operated subsequently. The mortality rate was 18%, and the deaths occurred on average at 9.8 months after the fracture (range 3 days to 3 years), with a mean age of death of 88.5 (range 81–94) years. Of the 6 patients who died, 3 died in the first month after their fracture (one was the patient who suffered 2 peri-prosthetic fractures 3 months apart, one in each femur and died 11 days after the second fracture) and the other 3 died at least one year after the fracture. Death was not statistically significantly associated with either the treatment used (surgical or conservative) or the site of the initial fracture (hip or knee) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>).</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Consolidation was visible on X-ray in 67.7% (23 cases) of the patients, with a mean of 4.2 (range 2–15) months. Of the remaining patients in whom consolidation was not visible on X-ray, 4 died before consolidation could be observed, another 4 patients stopped attending the monitoring visits (and no consolidation was visible on the last X-ray available), and another 3 cases were in follow-up but developed a pseudoarthrosis. Of all the patients, only 15 (45%) were discharged an average of 13.3 (range 3–29) months after their fracture. Mean follow-up was 24.4 (range 0–60) months (including the patients who died within the first post-operative month). If we exclude the 3 patients who died in the first postoperative month, the mean follow-up of the remaining 31 fractures was 26.7 (range 4–60) months.</p><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The 27 patients who were alive at the time the study was performed were given a telephone survey. Twenty-three patients responded to the survey (85.2%), and it was not possible to locate the other 4 (14.8%). The telephone survey completed the data on functional status before and after the fracture for the patients whose clinical history did not included this. Functional status significantly worsened as a consequence of the peri-prosthetic fracture (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.001), although this worsening had no statistically significant association with the treatment used (surgical or conservative) or the site of the initial fracture (hip or knee) (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>). A deterioration in functional status was observed in 61.5% of the patients (the patients who died were not taken into account, with no specific functional status data – 6 patients). Thirty point eight percent of the patients recovered the functional status they had before the fracture and 7.7% had better functional status after treatment of the peri-prosthetic fracture than they had before the fracture (these 2 patients sustained a peri-prosthetic fracture when they were on the waiting list for a change due to loosening of their prosthesis).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Furthermore, the survey provided data on pain and satisfaction. On a scale of 0 to 10, the patients rated their pain as 2.9 (range 0–8). The patients treated for a peri-prosthetic hip fracture experienced more pain than those who had suffered a peri-prosthetic knee fracture (4.5 vs. 0.9; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.01, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>). Five patients were woken at night by their pain; all of them had a peri-prosthetic hip fracture. Seventy-four percent of the patients were satisfied with the treatment of their fracture and the outcome achieved.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Discussion</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Many reviews have been carried out in recent year on peri-prosthetic knee and hip fractures<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2,5,13</span></a> and numerous series analysing aspects of the surgical technique, predisposing factors, fracture classification, financial aspects, etc.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,11,12,14–30</span></a> but there is still no consensus on the best way to approach them, and the outcomes presented are average or poor in most series. The data obtained in Spanish series in the last 20 years are shown in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a> and will serve as a reference when comparing those achieved in this series.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The mean age at which our patients sustained the fracture was 79.9 years, which is within the range described in the literature,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,17–27</span></a> and it occurred at an average of 60 months after arthroplasty, which is a rather shorter time than that presented in recent Spanish series.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,17,18,21,22,24</span></a> Numerous risk factors which predispose to peri-prosthetic femoral fracture have been described<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,2</span></a> and, as in other published series,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,18,19,24</span></a> we found a very high percentage of comorbidity. Although the classification of the fractures should theoretically determine the treatment of choice, this decision is very often affected by comorbidity, as some patients cannot be operated due to their general condition or comorbidity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,5,11,12</span></a> Ninety-one percent of our patients presented a comorbidity and up to 36% had up to 3 systemic diseases, which doubtless affected the choice of treatment in some cases and is a factor which should be taken into account when evaluating outcomes. Studies, although they use different measurement methods (ASA scale,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,18,24,25</span></a> Barthel's scale,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> count of concomitant diseases or risk factors,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,19,26</span></a> etc.), agree in that the patients who present peri-prosthetic femoral fractures are elderly and have important previous pathology. Treatment is complex, depends on the type of fracture, the experience and preferences of the surgical team and the condition of the patient,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1,5,11–14</span></a> which is clearly reflected in our series, using different surgical treatment options. Although in our series the admission time is short compared to others,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15,18,24,25</span></a> these fractures logically require significantly longer hospital stays for patients who are to undergo surgery compared to those managed conservatively, as can be seen in this study.</p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Peri-prosthetic fractures and their treatment represent a major traumatic insult for the patient. (59% of transfusions; 70% in operated patients), and they also have poor outcomes, and a high number of complications.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,15</span></a> It is difficult to compare some series with others (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>), because some authors only record major complications, others do not include patients who die in the days after the fracture in their series (because they do not meet the follow-up time or treatment type criteria) and others only focus on a particular type of complication. All the authors agree that the rate of complications is high (between 17% and 71%; 60.6% in our series), as is mortality (between 3% and 58%; 18% in our series). We should point out that although mortality is high, the average age of the patients who died was 88.5 years and therefore, although we consider that the fracture could have been a destabilising factor, the patients’ diseases and general condition are very relevant.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We have observed a reduction in the functional capacity of patients in 61.5% of cases; or in other words, after the fracture and the treatment, only 38.5% of the patients recovered at least the functional status that they had before they incurred the fracture, which is in line with that observed by other authors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> Furthermore, the patients continued to experience pain months afterwards (mean score of 2.9 out of 10), and furthermore the pain was enough to wake them at night in up to 22% of patients. It is striking that the patients who presented a peri-prosthetic femoral fracture around a hip prosthesis had significantly more pain than those who suffered the fracture around a knee prosthesis, and also the pain woke them at night more frequently. We found no factor in our series or in the literature to explain this difference in pain, but we consider that it should be taken into consideration in future studies.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Despite all the difficulties that we have described and the objectively poor outcomes achieved, 74% of our patients state that they are satisfied with the treatment received, and if they had the choice would repeat the same treatment, therefore although we should continue to seek better solutions, patients are aware of the seriousness of their illness and “assess us” as a consequence.</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This study presents the limitations inherent in a retrospective study, especially in terms of data collection, as well as the heterogeneous group of the fracture type and the treatment given and has a relatively small number of cases since, although on the increase, peri-prosthetic fractures are not very common.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Conclusions</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures around knee and hip arthroplasty can be considered a single disease, as they are a problematic pair in a similar group of patients. Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures require individualised treatment, meticulous preoperative planning and challenging surgery. The rate of complications and mortality is very high and approximately 2 thirds of patients are not able to recover their previous functional capacity. All of this represents a challenge for surgeons, suffering for the patient and their family, and a high cost to society.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Level of evidence</span><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Level of evidence IV.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Ethical responsibilities</span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Protection of human and animal subjects</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that neither human nor animal testing have been carried out under this research.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Confidentiality of data</span><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have complied with their work centre protocols for the publication of patient data.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Right to privacy and informed consent</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that no patients’ data appear in this article.</p></span></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Conflicts of interest</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:13 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres719792" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Purpose" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Material and methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec724974" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres719793" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Material y método" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0045" "titulo" => "Discusión" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0050" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec724973" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Methods" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Statistical analysis" ] ] ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Level of evidence" ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Ethical responsibilities" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Protection of human and animal subjects" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Confidentiality of data" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Right to privacy and informed consent" ] ] ] 11 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Conflicts of interest" ] 12 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2015-10-01" "fechaAceptado" => "2016-06-14" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec724974" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Peri-prosthetic fracture" 1 => "Femur" 2 => "Knee arthroplasty" 3 => "Hip arthroplasty" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec724973" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Fracturas periprotésicas" 1 => "Fémur" 2 => "Prótesis rodilla" 3 => "Prótesis cadera" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Purpose</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To evaluate peri-prosthetic femoral fractures by analysing type of patient, treatment and outcomes, and to compare them with Spanish series published in the last 20 years.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Material and methods</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A retrospective review of the medical records of patients with peri-prosthetic femoral fractures treated in our hospital from 2010 to 2014, and telephone survey on the current status.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A total of 34 peri-prosthetic femoral fractures were analysed, 20 in hip arthroplasty and 14 in knee arthroplasty. The mean age of the patients was 79.9 years, and 91% had previous comorbidity, with up to 36% having at least 3 prior systemic diseases. Mean hospital stay was 8.7 days, and was higher in surgically-treated than in conservative-treated patients. The majority (60.6%) of patients had complications, and mortality was 18%. Functional status was not regained in 61.5% of patients, and pain was higher in hip than in knee arthroplasty.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Discussion</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures are increasing in frequency. This is due to the increasing number of arthroplasties performed and also to the increasing age of these patients. Treatment of these fractures is complex because of the presence of an arthroplasty component, low bone quality, and comorbidity of the patients.</p></span> <span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Conclusion</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures impair quality of life. They need individualised treatment, and have frequent complications and mortality.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Purpose" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Material and methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Evaluar las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur analizando las características de los pacientes, el tipo de tratamiento y los resultados, y compararlas con las series españolas publicadas en los últimos 20 años.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Material y método</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Evaluación retrospectiva de las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur atendidas en nuestro centro entre 2010 y 2014. Revisión de las historias clínicas y encuesta telefónica sobre la situación actual.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Resultados</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Hemos analizado 34 fracturas periprotésicas de fémur, 20 sobre prótesis de cadera y 14 sobre prótesis de rodilla. La edad media fue 79,9 años. El 91% tenían comorbilidad previa y hasta un 36% tenían al menos 3 enfermedades sistémicas previas. La estancia hospitalaria media fue 8,7 días, mayor en los casos tratados quirúrgicamente. Hasta el 60,6% de los pacientes presentaron complicaciones y la tasa de mortalidad ha sido del 18%. El 61,5% de los pacientes no recuperaron el estado funcional previo a la fractura, con mayor dolor en los pacientes con artroplastia de cadera.</p></span> <span id="abst0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Discusión</span><p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur son cada vez más frecuentes, porque cada vez se realizan más artroplastias y en pacientes más mayores. El tratamiento es complejo, porque a la propia dificultad de la fractura se añade la presencia de un implante previo, la baja calidad ósea y la comorbilidad.</p></span> <span id="abst0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las fracturas periprotésicas de fémur suponen una merma en la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Requieren un tratamiento individualizado. La tasa de complicaciones y de mortalidad es muy elevada.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Objetivo" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Material y método" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0045" "titulo" => "Discusión" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0050" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">Please cite this article as: Gracia-Ochoa M, Miranda I, Orenga S, Hurtado-Oliver V, Sendra F, Roselló-Añón A. Fracturas periprotésicas de fémur sobre prótesis de cadera y rodilla. Análisis de una serie de 34 casos y revisión de las series españolas en los últimos 20 años. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2016;60:271–278.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:3 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Statistically significant difference * (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><0.05), ** (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><0.01) surgical vs. conservative or hip vs. knee.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Surgical treatment (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>26) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Conservative treatment (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Peri-prosthetic hip fractures (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>20) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Peri-prosthetic knee fractures (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>14) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Total (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>34) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Age (years) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">79.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">81.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">81.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">78.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">79.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Sex (% females) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">85 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">71 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">75 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">92 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">82 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Previous comorbidity (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">92 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">86 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">100* \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">77 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">91 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">N. previous systemic diseases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.09 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Time from prosthesis to fracture (months) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">56.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">73.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">66.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">51.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">60 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Days of admission \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10.1** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Transfusion (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">69** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">62 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">50 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">59 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Complications (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">61.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">50 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">70 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">60.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Reoperation (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Death (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">38 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Time from fracture to death (months) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">9.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Time until consolidation (months) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Follow-up time \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Current pain (from 0 to 10) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">3.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.5** \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Pain waking the patient at night (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">38* \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">The patient would repeat the treatment (% “yes”) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">72 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">80 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">69 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">80 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">74 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1183334.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Outcomes according to treatment (surgical/orthopaedic) and site of the initial fracture (hip/knee).</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Surgical treatment \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Conservative treatment \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Peri-prosthetic hip fractures \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Peri-prosthetic knee fractures \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Total \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Worse, % \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">66.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">62.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">60 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">61.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">The same, % \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">28.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">40 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">31.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">30.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Better, % \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">4.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">20 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Number of cases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">21 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">16 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">10 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1183333.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Change in the patients’ functional status after peri-prosthetic femoral fracture.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at3" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">y: years; dis: diseases; Fr: fracture; m: months; orth: orthopaedic; sur.: surgical.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Author \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Year \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Fr type \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Number of cases \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Age at Fr. (years) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Time from prosthesis to Fr. (months) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Comorbidity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Treatment \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Admission time (days) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Complications<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Follow-up time (months) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="table-head " align="left" valign="top" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Mortality \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Current series \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip<br>Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">34 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">79.9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">60 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">91%<br>36% >3 dis. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">66.5% sur.<br>23.5% orth. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">60.6% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">24.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">18%<br>9% 1st m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Toro-Ibarguen et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0235"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2015 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">26 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">75 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Retrograde nail \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">54% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">81 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">38%<br>0% in 6m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Suárez-Huerta et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2015 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip hemiarthroplasty \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">17 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">86 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">73 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Barthel 57<br>ASA 3.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">82% sur.<br>18% orth \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">16 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">65% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">53%<br>35% in 3m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Moreta et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0225"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2015 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">59 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">79 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">85 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">66%<br>ASA ≥3 44% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">90% sur.<br>10% orth \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">22 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">56% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">33.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">48%<br>24% in \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Saus et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2014 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">29 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">78 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">45% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">44.8% plate<br>24% nail<br>14% orth \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">71% nail<br>14% plate \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">23.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Muñoz-Mahamud et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0250"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2013 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip B2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">78.1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Change \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">27% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">9% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Lizaur-Utrilla et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2013 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">75.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">84 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">sur. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">21% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">80.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">3% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">García-Rey et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2013 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip B2 and B3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">35 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">80.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">92.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Revision stem \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">29% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">99.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Navarro Carmona et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">23</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2012 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">72.7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">51.6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">44% nail<br>56% plate \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">33% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">32.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Font-Vizcarra et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0270"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2010 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">21 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">80.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">98.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">ASA 3 (mean) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Allograft \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">20.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">29% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">38.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">19% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Font-Vizcarra et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0275"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2010 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip B1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">82.3 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">ASA 2.65 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">50% plate<br>50% plate+allograft \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">18 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">17% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">8% in 3m<br>42% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Blanco Pozo et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0280"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2007 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">54 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">76 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">33% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">76% sur.<br>24% orth \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">20% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">7% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Parrón et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">2007 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">12 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">76.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">49.2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Retrograde nail \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">25% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">17% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Morales Santías et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1999 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">25 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">69 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">54 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">16% orth<br>84% sur. \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">40% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">28 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Baixauli et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0295"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1999 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Hip \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">6 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">76 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">From 1 to 3m \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Double plate \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">50% \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="table-entry ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="top">Navarrete Faubel et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">1999 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">Knee \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">64 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">43% rheumatoid arthritis \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="left" valign="top">57% sur.<br>43% orth \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="char" valign="top">46 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="table-entry " align="" valign="top"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab1183335.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">The method used to measure complications differs very much from one study to another, some only record serious complications or a specific type of complication. This should be taken into account when evaluating the data.</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Series on peri-prosthetic fracture in Spain published in the past 20 years.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:30 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic femur fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "W.M. Ricci" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1097/BOT.0000000000000282" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Orthop Trauma" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "130" "paginaFinal" => "137" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25699540" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "C.C. Sidler-Maier" 1 => "J.P. Waddell" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00264-015-2721-y" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int Orthop" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "39" "paginaInicial" => "1673" "paginaFinal" => "1682" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813458" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "R.M. Meek" 1 => "T. Norwood" 2 => "R. Smith" 3 => "I.J. Brenkel" 4 => "C.R. Howie" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25087" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg Br" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "93" "paginaInicial" => "96" "paginaFinal" => "101" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21196551" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology: hip and knee" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "D.J. Berry" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Orthop Clin N Am" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "183" "paginaFinal" => "190" ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Periprosthetic fractures around the knee: current concepts and advances in management" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M.R. Whitehouse" 1 => "S. Mehendale" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s12178-014-9216-0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "136" "paginaFinal" => "144" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24682988" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results in a consecutive series" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "H.M. Schrøder" 1 => "A. Berthelsen" 2 => "G. Hassani" 3 => "E.B. Hansen" 4 => "S. Solgaard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplast" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "559" "paginaFinal" => "567" ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Operative treatment of distal femoral fractures proximal to total knee replacements" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "W.L. Healy" 1 => "J.M. Siliski" 2 => "S.J. Incavo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg Am" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "75" "paginaInicial" => "27" "paginaFinal" => "34" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8419387" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A.E. Inglis" 1 => "P.S. Walker" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg (Br)" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "73" "paginaInicial" => "757" "paginaFinal" => "761" ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.A. Ritter" 1 => "P.M. Faris" 2 => "E.M. Keating" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplast" "fecha" => "1988" "volumen" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "185" "paginaFinal" => "187" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K.D. Merkel" 1 => "E.W. Johnson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Bone Joint Surg Am" "fecha" => "1986" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "29" "paginaFinal" => "43" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3941120" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Results of treatment of periprospthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M. Korbel" 1 => "P. Sponer" 2 => "T. Lucera" 3 => "E. Procházka" 4 => "T. Procek" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Med" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "56" "paginaInicial" => "67" "paginaFinal" => "72" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "G.A. Naqvi" 1 => "S.A. Baig" 2 => "N. Awan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplast" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "27" "paginaInicial" => "1047" "paginaFinal" => "1050" ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "P.V. Giannoudis" 1 => "N.K. Kanakaris" 2 => "E. Tsiridis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.050" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "669" "paginaFinal" => "687" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17467709" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision components, distal femoral replacement prosthesis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "K. Saidi" 1 => "O. Ben-Lulu" 2 => "M. Tsuji" 3 => "O. Safir" 4 => "A.E. Gross" 5 => "D. Backstein" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplast" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "110" "paginaFinal" => "114" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J. Moreta" 1 => "U. Aguirre" 2 => "O.S. de Ugarte" 3 => "I. Jáuregui" 4 => "J.L. Mozos" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.013" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "46" "paginaInicial" => "292" "paginaFinal" => "298" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25085599" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "What is the financial cost of treating periprosthetic hip fractures?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J.R. Phillips" 1 => "C. Boulton" 2 => "C.G. Morac" 3 => "A.R. Manktelov" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.injury.2010.06.003" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Injury" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "42" "paginaInicial" => "146" "paginaFinal" => "149" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20673576" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The number of locking screws predicts the risk of nonunion and reintervention in periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty fractures treated with a nail" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Toro-Ibarguen" 1 => "J.A. Moreno-Beamud" 2 => "M.A. Porras-Moreno" 3 => "M. Aroca-Peinado" 4 => "J.L. León-Baltasar" 5 => "A.A. Jorge-Mora" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00590-014-1541-x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "661" "paginaFinal" => "664" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249480" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas periprotésicas de fémur sobre hemiartroplastia. Análisis de una serie de 17 casos" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M. Suárez-Huerta" 1 => "A. Roces-Fernández" 2 => "R. Mencía-Barrio" 3 => "J.A. Alonso-Barrio" 4 => "L.R. Ramos-Pascua" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.recot.2014.11.002" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "333" "paginaFinal" => "342" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25532696" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tratamiento de las fracturas periprotésicas de rodilla: revisión de 29 casos" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "N. Saus" 1 => "A. Silvestre" 2 => "F. Almeida" 3 => "S. Gállego" 4 => "F. Gomar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Cir Osteoartic" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "258" "paginaInicial" => "79" "paginaFinal" => "83" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Usefulness of histology for predicting infection at the time of hip revision for the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "E. Muñoz-Mahamud" 1 => "G. Bori" 2 => "S. García" 3 => "J. Ramírez" 4 => "J. Riba" 5 => "A. Soriano" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplast" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "28" "paginaInicial" => "1247" "paginaFinal" => "1250" ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty after periprosthetic distal femoral fracture" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Lizaur-Utrilla" 1 => "F.A. Miralles-Muñoz" 2 => "J. Sanz-Reig" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Arthroplast" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "28" "paginaInicial" => "1585" "paginaFinal" => "1588" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "E. García-Rey" 1 => "E. García-Cimbrelo" 2 => "A. Cruz-Pardos" 3 => "R. Madero" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s11999-013-2845-6" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clin Orthop Relat Res" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "471" "paginaInicial" => "3912" "paginaFinal" => "3921" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23430720" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas femorales periprotésicas de rodilla tratadas con clavo intramedular retrógrado y osteosíntesis con placa: comparación de resultados a medio-largo plazo" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "F.J. Navarro Carmona" 1 => "J. Serrano Montilla" 2 => "E. Montañez Heredia" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev S Traum Ort" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "31" "paginaFinal" => "40" ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cortical strut allograft as an adjunct to plate fixation for periprosthetic fractures of the femur" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Font-Vizcarra" 1 => "J.A. Fernandez-Valencia" 2 => "X. Gallart" 3 => "J.M. Segur" 4 => "S. Prat" 5 => "J. Riba" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Hip Int" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "43" "paginaFinal" => "49" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20235076" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluación de resultados en el tratamiento de fracturas periprotésicas Vancouver B1 y propuesta de indicaciones del uso de aloinjerto cortical como parte de la fijación" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "L. Font-Vizcarra" 1 => "E. Muñoz-Mahamud" 2 => "J.A. Fernández-Valencia" 3 => "X. Gallart" 4 => "S. Prat" 5 => "J. Riba" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Ortop Mex" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "215" "paginaFinal" => "219" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21305756" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Indicaciones y tratamiento de las fracturas periprotésicas de cadera" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M.A. Blanco Pozo" 1 => "J. López-Moya Gómez" 2 => "J.M. García Pesquera" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Patología del Aparato Locomotor" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "26" "paginaFinal" => "32" ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tratamiento de las fracturas periprotésicas de rodilla de fémur distal mediante clavo intramedular retrógrado" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R. Parrón" 1 => "F. Tomé" 2 => "S. Pajares" 3 => "J.A. Herrera" 4 => "J.M. Madruga" 5 => "A. Hermida" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Ortop Traumatol" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "51" "paginaInicial" => "314" "paginaFinal" => "318" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas femorales en pacientes portadores de artroplastia de cadera" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "M. Morales Santías" 1 => "J.E. Martínez Giménez" 2 => "J.E. Salinas Gilabert" 3 => "J. de Anta y de Barrio" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Cir Osteoartic" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "127" "paginaFinal" => "130" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas periprotésicas de fémur en pacientes portadores de prótesis total de cadera. Tratamiento mediante doble placa" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "F. Baixauli Castellá" 1 => "F. Baixauli García" 2 => "E. Baixauli Perello" 3 => "R. Gabarda Llorens" 4 => "A. Peiró González" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Cir Osteoartic" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "214" "paginaFinal" => "218" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Fracturas supracondíleas sobre prótesis total de rodilla" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "F.E. Navarrete Faubel" 1 => "V. Torró Belenguer" 2 => "E. Baixauli Perelló" 3 => "D. López-Quiles Gómez" 4 => "J. Aracil Silvestre" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Rev Esp Cir Osteoartic" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "136" "paginaFinal" => "139" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/19888856/0000006000000005/v1_201608210033/S1988885616300360/v1_201608210033/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "7577" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/19888856/0000006000000005/v1_201608210033/S1988885616300360/v1_201608210033/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1988885616300360?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2024 October | 21 | 8 | 29 |
2024 September | 22 | 3 | 25 |
2024 August | 16 | 1 | 17 |
2024 July | 19 | 5 | 24 |
2024 June | 11 | 2 | 13 |
2024 May | 20 | 4 | 24 |
2024 April | 36 | 13 | 49 |
2024 March | 20 | 8 | 28 |
2024 February | 17 | 7 | 24 |
2024 January | 75 | 5 | 80 |
2023 December | 17 | 7 | 24 |
2023 November | 14 | 5 | 19 |
2023 October | 19 | 4 | 23 |
2023 September | 10 | 1 | 11 |
2023 August | 8 | 3 | 11 |
2023 July | 11 | 3 | 14 |
2023 June | 26 | 1 | 27 |
2023 May | 27 | 3 | 30 |
2023 April | 44 | 0 | 44 |
2023 March | 33 | 8 | 41 |
2023 February | 21 | 3 | 24 |
2023 January | 30 | 6 | 36 |
2022 December | 24 | 4 | 28 |
2022 November | 20 | 5 | 25 |
2022 October | 17 | 11 | 28 |
2022 September | 20 | 17 | 37 |
2022 August | 13 | 10 | 23 |
2022 July | 9 | 6 | 15 |
2022 June | 13 | 9 | 22 |
2022 May | 11 | 4 | 15 |
2022 April | 16 | 10 | 26 |
2022 March | 12 | 9 | 21 |
2022 February | 12 | 3 | 15 |
2022 January | 9 | 6 | 15 |
2021 December | 6 | 7 | 13 |
2021 November | 18 | 6 | 24 |
2021 October | 17 | 13 | 30 |
2021 September | 25 | 9 | 34 |
2021 August | 13 | 7 | 20 |
2021 July | 16 | 7 | 23 |
2021 June | 15 | 4 | 19 |
2021 May | 9 | 7 | 16 |
2021 April | 52 | 6 | 58 |
2021 March | 15 | 11 | 26 |
2021 February | 13 | 8 | 21 |
2021 January | 17 | 5 | 22 |
2020 December | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2016 August | 1 | 1 | 2 |