covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC ANTECEDENTES DE LAS REDES SOCIALES COMO CANALES DE COMUNICACIÓN PROMOCIONAL PAR...
Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Open Access
ANTECEDENTES DE LAS REDES SOCIALES COMO CANALES DE COMUNICACIÓN PROMOCIONAL PARA LOS JÓVENES*
ANTECEDENTS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE AS A COMMUNICATION CHANNEL FOR THE YOUTH
Visits
3800
Shintaro Okazaki, Natalia Rubio Benito, Sara Campo Martínez1
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Received 11 November 2010. Accepted 20 November 2011
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
RESUMEN

En este trabajo propone un marco conceptual de estudio de las redes sociales que toma como referente el modelo de comunidad de marca de Algesheimer, et al. (2005), y se extiende este modelo proponiendo antecedentes de la identificación del usuario con la red social (grado de vinculación con la red, entretenimiento con la red, reconocimiento social y utilidad percibida en la red) y consecuentes del compromiso con la red social (boca-oído electrónico y comportamiento hacia la marca). El modelo planteado se contrasta empíricamente para los jóvenes universitarios de una ciudad española y se propone un modelo alternativo con interesantes implicaciones para la gestión, como el papel clave del entretenimiento en la identificación del usuario con su red social y consecuentemente en su compromiso con la red y en la respuesta posterior a actividades promocionales de la marca en la red social.

Palabras clave:
Boca-oído electrónico
comunidad de marca
identificación
redes sociales
ABSTRACT

This study proposes a conceptual framework for research on social networking sites by extending Algesheimer et al's. (2005) social influence model on brand community. The extension includes antecedents of users’ identification with the site (i.e. degree of network-person connectivity, entertainment, social recognition, and perceived utility) as well as consequences of commitment to the site (i.e. electronic word-of-mouth and brand behavior). The proposed model is empirically validated by the data from student sample of a large Spanish University, which resulted in an alternative model. Our findings provide interesting managerial implications: it is entertainment that plays a pivotal role in strengthening users’ identification with the site, their resulted commitment to the site, and finally behavioral responses to brand promotions on the site.

Keywords:
University image
identification
loyalty
Full text is only aviable in PDF
6. REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
[Ajzen, 1991]
Ajzen.
“The theory of planned behavior”.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (1991), pp. 179-211
[Algesheimer et al., 2005]
R. Algesheimer, U.M. Dholakia, A. Herrmann.
“The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs”.
Journal of Marketing, 69 (2005), pp. 19-34
[Bagozzi y Dholakia, 1999]
R.P. Bagozzi, U.M. Dholakia.
“Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior”.
Journal of Marketing, 63 (1999), pp. 1932
[Bentler, 1989]
P.M. Bentler.
EQS Structural Equations Program, BMDP Statistical Software, (1989),
[Bentler y Bonett, 1980]
P.M. Bentler, D.G. Bonett.
“Significance tests y goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures”.
Psychological Bulletin, 88 (1980), pp. 588-606
[Bhattacharya y Sen, 2003]
C.B. Bhattacharya, S. Sen.
“Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies”.
Journal of Marketing, 67 (2003), pp. 7688
[Bigné Alcañiz et al., 2010]
Bigné Alcañiz, E., Currás Pérez, R., Ruiz Mafé, C. y Sanz Blas, S. (2010), “Factores determinantes del comportamiento del consumidor en las redes sociales. Un análisis de los internautas españoles”, Actas del XXII Congreso Nacional de Marketing AEMARK, Oviedo.
[Boyd y Ellison, 2008]
D.M. Boyd, N.B. Ellison.
“Social Network Sites: Definition, History, y Scholarship”.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2008), pp. 210230
[Brown et al., 2007]
J. Brown, A.J. Broderick, N. Lee.
“Word-of-Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network”.
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (2007), pp. 2-20
[Bruner y Kumar, 2005]
G.C. Bruner, A. Kumar.
Explaining Consumer Acceptance of Handheld Internet Devices.
Journal of Business Research, 58 (2005), pp. 553-558
[Byrne, 2009]
Byrne, B.N. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[Cialdini y Goldstein, 2004]
R.B. Cialdini, N.J. Goldstein.
“Social influence: Compliance and conformity”.
Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (2004), pp. 591-621
[Comscore, 2009]
Comscore.
“Tuenti Most Popular Social Networking Site in Spain: Spanish Language Interface Introduction Helps Facebook Surge into Second Position”.
[Dholakia et al., 2004]
U.M. Dholakia, R.P. Bagozzi, L.K. Pearo.
“A social influence model of consumer participation in network- y small-group-based virtual communities”.
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (2004), pp. 241-263
[Eagly y Chaiken, 1993]
A.H. Eagly, S. Chaiken.
The Psychology of Attitudes, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, (1993),
[Emarketer, 2009]
Emarketer.
“Social Networking Worldwide: Ad Spending y Usage”.
[Flanagin y Metzger, 2001]
A.J. Flanagin, M.J. Metzger.
“Internet use in the contemporary media environment”.
Human Communication Research, 27 (2001), pp. 153-181
[Gangadharbatla, 2008]
H. Gangadharbatla.
“Facebook Me: Collective Self-Esteem, Need to Belong, y Internet Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the I generation's Attitudes toward Social Networking Sites”.
Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18 (2008), pp. 5-15
[Gefen et al., 2000]
D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, M.C. Boudreau.
“Structural equation modelling y regression: Guidelines for research practice”.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4 (2000), pp. 1-80
[Hair et al., 1998]
J. Hair, R.E. Yerson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black.
Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, (1998),
[Hargittai, 2007]
E. Hargittai.
“Whose space? Differences among users y non-users of social network sites”.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2007),
[Hatcher, 1994]
L. Hatcher.
A step-by-step approach to using the SAS System for Factor Analysis y Structural Equation Modelling, SAS Institute Inc., (1994),
[Kim y Yun, 2007]
K.-H. Kim, H. Yun.
“Crying for me, Crying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site”.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2007),
[Lewis et al., 2008]
K. Lewis, J. Kaufman, N. Christakis.
“The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network”.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (2008), pp. 79100
[Marketing Science Institute, 2008]
Marketing Science Institute.
Research Priorities: 20082010 Guide to MSI Research Programs y Procedures.
[Muniz y O'guinn, 2001]
A.M. Muniz Jr., T.C. O'guinn.
“Brand Community”.
Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (2001), pp. 412-431
[Peluchette y Karl, 2008]
J. Peluchette, K. Karl.
“Social Networking Profiles: An Examination of Student Attitudes Regarding Use y Appropriateness of Content”.
CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11 (2008), pp. 95-97
[Raacke y Bonds-Raacke, 2008]
J. Raacke, J. Bonds-Raacke.
“MySpace y Facebook: Applying the Uses y Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites”.
CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11 (2008), pp. 169-174
[Ruiz De Maya et al., 2008]
Ruiz De Maya, S., Sicilia M. y Johar G.V. (2008), “El rol de las expectativas del consumidor en el boca-oído electrónico”, Actas del XX Encuentro de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing AEMARK, Maspalomas, Gran Canaria.
[Schiffman et al., 2003]
L. Schiffman, E. Sherman, M. Long.
“Toward a better understanding of the interplay of personal values and the Internet”.
Psychology & Marketing, 20 (2003), pp. 169186
[Selfgrowth.com, 2010]
Selfgrowth.com (2010), “What are the most important social networking websites?”. http://www.selfgrowth.com/socialnetworkingwebsites.html]. (acceso el 5 de mayo de 2010).
[Sicilia et al., 2007]
Sicilia, M., Ruiz De Maya, S. y Johar G.V. (2007), “The influence of electronic word of mouth on consumers behavior. The moderating effect of experience“, Proceedings of the 36th EMAC Conference, Reykjavik, Islandia.
[Sicilia y Lopez, 2009]
Sicilia, M. y Lopez, M. (2009), “Influencia del boca a boca en el proceso de compra: una aplicación al sector turístico”, Actas del XXI Congreso Nacional de Marketing AEMARK, Bilbao.
[Subrahmanyam et al., 2008]
K. Subrahmanyam, S. Reich, N. Waechter, G. Espinoza.
“Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults”.
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29 (2008), pp. 420433
[Trusov et al., 2009]
M. Trusov, R.E. Bucklin, K. Pauwels.
“Effects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site”.
Journal of Marketing, 73 (2009), pp. 90102

El estudio ha sido realizado con el apoyo financiero prestado por el proyecto de investigación perteneciente al Plan Nacional de i+D+i 2008-2011 (código: ECO2008-01557). Los autores también agradecen el proyecto de cooperación interuniversitario de UAM-Grupo Santander por la inspiración de la idea.

Profesores de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de CC. Económicas y Empresariales. Campus de Campoblanco. 28049 Madrid. Direcciones electrónicas de contacto

Copyright © 2012. ESIC and AEMARK
Article options
Tools
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos