covid
Buscar en
Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial Comparison of Two Self-Etching Primers and Effect of Saliva Contamination on She...
Journal Information
Vol. 48. Issue 4.
Pages 197-203 (October - December 2007)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 48. Issue 4.
Pages 197-203 (October - December 2007)
Investigação
Open Access
Comparison of Two Self-Etching Primers and Effect of Saliva Contamination on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
Visits
3697
Joana Godinho*, Sofia S.A. Oliveira**, Luís Jardim***
* Assistente estagiária, Unidade de Ortodontia da Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa
** Professora auxiliar, Departamento de Biomateriais da Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa
*** Professor catedrático, Coordenador do Curso Pós-graduado de Especialização em Ortodontia da Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa. Presidente do Colégio de Ortodontia da Ordem dos Médicos Dentistas
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Resumo
Introdução

A contaminação salivar é uma das principais causas de insucesso na cimentação de brackets. Os selfetching primers, recentemente introduzidos em ortodontia, reduzem o tempo de execução da técnica e a probabilidade de contaminação.

Objectivos

Determinar o efeito da contaminação salivar na resistência adesiva a forças de corte de brackets ortodônticos, cimentados com dois self-etching primers.

Materiais e Métodos

Foram cimentados 100 brackets em premolares humanos (10 amostras por grupo), utilizando 2 adesivos (Transbond Plus e First Step) e 5 condições de superfície: 1) Condição ideal, esmalte seco; 2) Contaminação salivar antes do primer; 3) Contaminação salivar e secagem antes do primer; 4) Contaminação salivar depois do primer; 5) Contaminação salivar depois do primer, secagem e reaplicação do primer. As amostras foram armazenadas 7 dias em água a 37°C e sujeitas a 500 ciclos de termociclagem. A área de adesão foi observada ao microscópio óptico para determinar o tipo de falha adesiva.

Resultados

A análise de variância demonstrou diferenças significativas entre as forças de resistência adesiva, sendo o Transbond Plus superior ao First Step. A contaminação não influenciou significativamente a resistência adesiva.

Conclusões

1) A resistência adesiva foi mais elevada com o Transbond Plus em comparação com o First Step, independentemente da condição. 2) Para ambos os selfetching primers, a adesão não foi significativamente afectada pela presença de saliva ou pelos procedimentos de descontaminação. 3) No grupo do First Step foi encontrado um maior número de falhas adesivas na interface dente / resina composta.

Palavras-Chave:
Self-etching primers
Saliva
Contaminação
Força de cisalhamento
Índice de Adesivo Residual
Abstract
Introduction

Saliva contamination during the bonding procedure is a common cause of bracket bond failure. By combining acid and primer in one component, self-etching primers (SEP) reduce the working time and the risk of contamination.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of saliva contamination of the enamel surface on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with two self-etching primers.

Materials and Methods

One hundred orthodontic brackets were bonded to human premolars with Transbond Plus Self-etching Primer (TPSEP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) or First Step (FS, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL) under the following enamel surface conditions: 1) dry enamel; 2) saliva contamination/primer; 3) saliva contamination/air drying/primer; 4) primer/saliva contamination; 5) primer/saliva contamination/air drying/reapplication of the primer. Samples were stored for 7 days in water at 37°C and submitted to 500 cycles of thermal stress. Bond failure sites were classified by an Adhesive Remnant Index score system.

Results

Mean shear bond strengths were significantly higher in the TPSEP groups compared to the FS groups (p<.001). For the same adhesive, no significant differences were found between the enamel surface conditions. More adhesive failures were observed in the FS groups.

Conclusions

Brackets bonded with TPSEP had the highest shear bond strength values, under the different enamel surface conditions. For both SEPs, bond strengths were not significantly affected by the enamel surface conditions. The FS groups failed more frequently at the enamel /resin interface.

Key-words:
Self-etching primers
Saliva
Contamination
Shear-peel bond strength
Adhesive Remnant Index
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1-]
V. Cacciafesta, M.F. Sfondrini, M. De Angelis, A. Scribante, C. Klersy.
Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123 (2003), pp. 633-640
[2-]
B.J. Zachrisson.
A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics.
Am J Orthod, 71 (1977), pp. 173-189
[3-]
L.M. Silverstone, M.J. Hicks, M.J. Featherstone.
Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study.
J Am Dent Assoc, 110 (1985), pp. 329-392
[4-]
J. Xie, J.M. Powers, R.S. McGuckin.
In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions.
Dent Mater, 9 (1993), pp. 295-299
[5-]
A.J. Gwinnett.
Bonding of restorative resins to enamel.
Int Dent J, 38 (1988), pp. 91-96
[6-]
J.M. Powers, W.J. Finger, J. Xie.
Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin.
J Prosthodont, 4 (1995), pp. 28-32
[7-]
H. Chigira, T. Koike, T. Hasegawa, K. Itoh, S. Wakumoto, T. Hayakawa.
Effect of the self etching dentin primers on the bonding efficacy of a dentin adhesive.
Dent Mater, 8 (1989), pp. 86-92
[8-]
W.W. Barkmeier, S.A. Los, P.T. Triolo.
Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2.
Am J Dent, 8 (1995), pp. 289-293
[9-]
N. Nakabayashi.
Dentinal bonding mechanisms.
Quintessence Int, 22 (1991), pp. 73-74
[10-]
H. Grubisa, Heo Giseon, D. Raboud, K.E. Glover, P.W. Major.
An evaluation and comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths achieved with self-etching primer.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126 (2004), pp. 13-19
[11-]
I.L. Zeppieri, C.H. Chung, F.K. Mante.
Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124 (2003), pp. 414-419
[12-]
S.E. Bishara, V.V. Gordan, L. VonWald, M.E. Olson.
Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114 (1998), pp. 243-247
[13-]
S.E. Bishara, L. VonWald, J.F. Laffoon, J.J. Warren.
Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119 (2001), pp. 621-624
[14-]
S.E. Bishara, V.V. Gordan, L. VonWald, J.R. Jakobsen.
Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115 (1999), pp. 24-28
[15-]
S.E. Bishara, C. Oonsombat, R. Ajlouni, G. Denehy.
The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self-etch primer.
[16-]
R. Yamada, T. Hayakawa, K. Kasai.
Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
[17-]
Y.D. Aljubouri, D.T. Millett, W.H. Gilmour.
Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding.
Eur J Orthod, 25 (2003), pp. 411-415
[18-]
R.W. Arnold, E.C. Combe, J.H. Warford.
Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122 (2002), pp. 274-276
[19-]
C.J. Larmour, D.R. Stirrups.
An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer.
J Orthod, 30 (2003), pp. 225-228
[20-]
J.C. Dorminey, W.J. Dunn, L.J. Taloumis.
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant-andprimer technique.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124 (2003), pp. 410-413
[21-]
R. Rajagopal, S. Padmanabhan, J. Gnanamani.
A comparison of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of conventional, moisture-insensitive, and self-etching primers in vitro.
[22-]
Dental Materials. Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO/TS 11405: 2003.
[23-]
J. Årtun, S. Bergland.
Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pre-treatment.
Am J Orthod, 85 (1984), pp. 333-340
[24-]
S.E. Bishara, C. Oonsombat, R. Ajlouni, J.F. Laffoon.
Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer/adhesive systems.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125 (2004), pp. 348-350
[25-]
B. Trites, T.F. Foley, D. Banting.
Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etching primers over a 3-month storage period.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126 (2004), pp. 709-716
[26-]
S.S.A. Oliveira, M.K. Pugach, J.F. Hilton, L.G. Watanabe, S.J. Marshall, G.W. Marshall.
Dentin Smear Layer Variations and Adhesion of a Self-Etching Primer.
Dental Mater, 19 (2003), pp. 758-767

(Godinho J, Oliveira SSA, Jardim L. Comparison of Two Self-Etching Primers and Effect of Saliva Contamination on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac 2007;48:197–203)

Copyright © 2007. Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos