covid
Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Influence in the quality of life of the respiratory patients by environmental co...
Información de la revista
Vol. 30. Núm. 2.
Páginas 85-93 (marzo 2002)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 30. Núm. 2.
Páginas 85-93 (marzo 2002)
Acceso a texto completo
Influence in the quality of life of the respiratory patients by environmental control and the acaricide Frontac®
Visitas
2614
A. Maleta, A. Cisteró-Bahimab, P. Amata, M. Lluch-Péreza, E. Enrique-Mirandab, R. Alonsob, M. San Miguelb, Mª G Pueyoc
a Al·lergo Centre, Barcelona, Spain,
b Servicio de Alergia, Institut Universitari Dexeus.
c Div. Consumer Care. Q.F. Bayer S.A. Barcelona. Spain.
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (5)
Figure 1. --Changes in the score of nasal symptoms. The score was rated from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). NS = non-significant. The data shown are means ± SEM.
Figure 2. --Changes in the quality of life (QoL) of subjects studied. The score was rated from 0 (not disturbing) to 6 (extremely disturbing) except for emotions where 0 (never) and 6 (all the time). NS = non-significant. The data shown are means ± SEM.
Figure 3. --Changes in the antigenicity of dust samples measured from guanine content (Acarex® test). The data shown are means ± SEM
Mostrar másMostrar menos
El estudio se realizó de manera prospectiva, abierta y observacional para valorar el efecto de las normas habituales de control ambiental de forma conjunta con la aplicación de un acaricida en aerosol de esbiol/bencil benzoato/piperonil/butóxido/2-fenilfenol (Frontac®) en pacientes afectos de rinoconjuntivitis perenne relacionada con sensibilización a ácaros del polvo doméstico. Cincuenta y cinco pacientes fueron incluidos y estudiados durante un año. Se procedió a tabular la calidad de vida de los pacientes mediante el cuestionario de calidad de vida para pacientes con rinoconjuntivitis. Los niveles de ácaros domésticos fueron evaluados de forma semicuantitiva mediante el test de guanina. Encontramos un significativo descenso (p < 0,001) en la mayoría de los registros de los síntomas nasales: estornudos, rinorrea, prurito nasal y obstrucción nasal. El registro del cuestionario de la calidad de vida también constató una significativa mejoría durante dicho periodo, siendo el descenso de la media del registro del 0,86 (IC 95 %, 0,54-1,17) (p < 0,001). Cinco de los siete ítems incluidos en el registro disminuyeron significativamente (síntomas respiratorios, problemas sociales, síntomas nasales, síntomas conjuntivales y síntomas afectivos). El registro del cuestionario descendió durante los primeros tres meses y se mantuvo con posterioridad por debajo de los valores basales de forma estable. El contenido de guanina de las muestras del polvo del habitat de los pacientes disminuyó significativamente de 2,17 ± 0,75 a 1,43 ± 0,68 (p < 0,001). No se detectaron reacciones tóxicas adversas. En conclusión, estos resultados demuestran una mejoría de la calidad de vida y mejoría clínica utilizando a largo plazo la aplicación del nuevo acaricida testado de forma conjunta con la aplicación de medidas ambientales del habitat de los pacientes que sufren enfermedad respiratoria alérgica.
Palabras clave:
Esbiol
Benzyl benzoate
Piperonyl butoxide
2-phenylphenol
Acaricide
Rhinoconjunctivitis
Bronchial asthma
Quality of life
The present prospective, open, observational study assessed the effect of the use of standard environmental control measures together with the application of an acaricide-containing aerosol of esbiol/benzyl benzoate/piperonyl butoxide/2-phenylphenol (Frontac®) on several clinical and environmental parameters in patients suffering from perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis related to house dust mites (HDM). Fifty-five patients were enrolled and studied for one year. Both symptoms and the patients' quality of life (evaluated by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)) were assessed at several clinic visits. The amount of HDM antigen was semi-quantitatively estimated using the guanine test. We found a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in most nasal symptoms scores: sneezing, runny nose, stuffy nose and itching. The overall quality of life (QoL) score also showed a significant improvement during the study period; the mean score decrease found was 0.86 (CI 95 %, 0.54-1.17) (p < 0.001). Five of the seven domains included in the questionnaire decreased significantly: non-hayfever symptoms; practical problems; nasal symptoms; eye symptoms, and emotions. These QoL score decreases were found during the first 3 months and later remained stable at lower levels than at baseline. The content of guanine in dust samples decreased significantly from 2.17 ± 0.75 to 1.43 ± 0.68 (p < 0.001). No toxic adverse events were recorded. In conclusion, these results show an improvement in the quality of life and a clinical benefit of the long-term use of the new chemical acaricide tested, together with environmental measures, in the home of patients suffering from allergic respiratory pathology.
Keywords:
Esbiol
Bencil benzoato
Piperonil butóxido
2-fenilfenol
Acaricida
Rinoconjuntivitis
Asma bronquial
Calidad de vida
Texto completo

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, allergic diseases have an increased prevalence, which shows urban predominance in the Western world. Sensitisation to pneumoallergens develops when potential patients are exposed to environmental allergens over certain threshold level; the maintenance or worsening of the allergic disease depends on the continuous exposure to these allergens. The most relevant allergens found in the city of Barcelona are the house dust mites (HDM). As the only aetiologic treatments are specific immunotherapy and eradication of the allergens responsible of the allergic symptomatology, we have performed a study to assess the clinical improvement and the level of quality of life after the application of environmental control measures and the acaricide Frontac®.

HDM play an important role in the aetiology of perennial allergic rhinitis and asthma (1, 2). The symptoms of perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis are the same as those of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, but nasal blockage is usually more intense; the symptoms are chronic and persistent, and the patients may present secondary complaints such as mouth-breathing, snoring, sinusitis or «a permanent cold» (3-5). Nevertheless, the patients with perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis are usually troubled not only by nasal/eye symptoms but also by the heavy impact on their health-related quality of life. The patients are limited in their inability to perform everyday activities, mental concentration is impaired, associated symptoms such as headaches are troublesome, practical things such as remembering to carry a handkerchief and repeatedly blowing the nose are a nuisance, sleep is impaired, social interaction is limited, and there is an impact on emotional well-being (6, 7).

The outdoor and indoor allergic environment has changed in most countries within the last decades and has increased the risks of allergic diseases. The microclimate of the modern house with fitted carpets, soft furnishings, central heating, double-glazing, and often with poor ventilation has provided the ideal habitat for HDM. When possible, environmental control measures for indoor allergens must be applied even if their efficacy is not complete, as they may generally improve the patient's condition and reduce the need for pharmacological treatment. Two major strategies have evolved: allergen avoidance/inactivation and mite population control by extermination. Thus, HDM avoidance can be attempted by reducing the amount of HDM itself, by reducing indoor humidity, by the application of acaricides and by the use of mite-proof covers (4). Nevertheless, even when an allergen source is removed from a patient's environment, the benefit may take several weeks or months to be perceived by the patient (8).

The aim of the present open, prospective, observational, multicentric study was to investigate over a period of one year (1999-2000) the effectiveness of a new acaricide-containing aerosol of esbiol/benzyl benzoate/piperonyl butoxide/2-phenylphenol (Frontac®) combined with the application of standard environmental control measures in the habitats of patients suffering from allergic respiratory pathology related to HDM and living in the city of Barcelona and surrounding area. Special interest was given to the analysis of the evolution of the patients' quality of life by using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) together with the analysis of clinical symptomatology. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of these measures on the antigenicity of house dust as assessed by the guanine content of the collected samples.

METHODS

Patients

The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) patients of both genders between 18 and 75 years of age; 2) residence in the city of Barcelona or in the nearest villages (< 10 km) in order to homogenise the environmental conditions; 3) presence of symptoms of perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (sustained rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal obstruction, nasal and eye itching and conjunctival watering) (4), with or without mild bronchial asthma, as defined by the American Thoracic Society (9); 4) positive skin prick tests to HDM (weal diameter ≥ 3 mm after 15 min of exposure); 5) normal baseline lung function (FEV1 > 80 %), and 6) serum specific IgE ≥ class 2 radioallergosorbent (RAST) test (Cap System). The exclusion criteria were the following: 1) immunotherapy during the period of study; 2) presence of pets in the patient's house; 3) patients without vacuum cleaner; 4) intolerance to some of the compounds present in the acaricide-containing aerosol; 5) patients who were participating in another study four or less weeks before inclusion, and 6) pregnancy. All patients provided their written informed consent.

Protocol

The present study was a prospective, open, observational, multicentric study that assessed the effect of an acaricide-containing aerosol of esbiol/benzyl benzoate/piperonyl butoxide/2-phenylphenol (Frontac®, Química Farmacéutica Bayer S.A., Barcelona, Spain), combined with the application of standard environmental control measures, on several clinical and environmental parameters. Esbiol and benzyl benzoate have a well-known acaricide effect (10) whereas piperonyl butoxide increases the acaricide effect of esbiol (11). Moreover, 2-phenylphenol is a fungicide that provides a complementary action by killing the fungi used by HDM as food, thus decreasing the HDM colonisation (12). The period of study was 12 months, with one initial visit and 4 quarterly follow-up visits. At the beginning of the study, the homes of 55 patients were visited by an allergology-trained registered nurse. The places where HDM may develop (mattresses, sofas, rugs, fitted carpets, curtains, etc.) were established and vacuumed for 2 min/m2. All vacuum applications were performed using the same vacuum cleaner. The acaricide-containing aerosol was further applied to this material susceptible to be colonised by HMD and these places were vacuumed again 1-2 hours later. The rooms were ventilated between the two vacuum applications; vacuum cleaners with microfilters (High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA)) were recommended to the patients. These procedures were performed monthly in absence of the allergic patient and standard environmental measures were used during all the 12-months period (13, 14).

The amount of HDM antigen was semi-quantitatively estimated using the Acarex(test (Merck Farma y Química, Barcelona, Spain). Guanine was extracted from raw dust with potassium hydroxide, and the amount present was estimated by the intensity of colour change on the test strip. For the test, it was presumed that the guanine thus identified came from mite faeces and that guanine levels were related to the antigenicity of the dust (15,16). The results were rated according to a 4-colour scale: negative = 0, slightly positive = 1, moderately positive = 2, and highly positive = 3 (16, 17). The patients were selected in a correlative way after compliance of inclusion criteria and after in vivo and in vitro tests characteristic of the speciality (18). The patients were asked to answer a questionnaire on their socio-economic status and housing conditions. Anterior rhinoscopy, basal rhinomanometry, and spirometry (only in patients with asthma) were performed at each quarterly visit. The severity of the symptoms was scored nominally (0 to 3) as follows: none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. In vivo (nasal provocation and skin prick test to HDM, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus [Dp] and Dermatophagoides farinae [Df]) and in vitro tests (determination of total [fluoroimmunoassay] and specific IgE to Dp and Df [Pharmacia CAP System, Uppsala, Sweden]) were performed at baseline and at the end of the study. The patients' quality of life was assessed using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) (6), translated into Spanish. All adverse events were documented in order to control the toxicity of the aerosol throughout the study. Moreover, the patients were asked to self-assess the subjective change in their disease by grading the severity compared to that measured during the previous visit, as follows: better, same, or worse.

Statistics

The database was created using the SPSS software v.10.0 for Windows, and the statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software v. 6.12 for Windows. Efficacy and toxicity analyses were performed on an «intention-to-treat» basis. First, the normality of the distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the homogeneity of variances was assessed using the most restrictive of either Bartlett's or Cochran's test. Nominal qualitative variables were assessed using the chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test for low frequency cases. Ordinal qualitative variables or quantitative variables with a log-normal distribution were assessed using the Friedman repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance), whereas quantitative variables with normal distribution were assessed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA test. Differences between data collected only at baseline and at the final visit were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank or the Student t tests, as appropriate. All analyses were performed using an alpha level of 5 %. The data shown are the mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the patients

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients at the beginning of the study are summarised in table I. Data were collected from: 55 case report forms (CRFs) completed by the researchers (100 %); 49 CRFs completed by specialised auxiliary nurses (89.1 %) that included the RQLQ, the guanine test results and the adherence to environmental measures, and 29 diaries completed by the patients. The most severe baseline symptoms were moderate nasal obstruction (1.98 ± 0.73) and sneezing (1.90 ± 0.75). Other nasal symptoms found were mild to moderate rhinorrhea (1.67 ± 0.73) and itching (1.44 ± 0.75). Moderate oedema and intranasal inflammation was found in 67.7 % of analysed patients, but nasal polyps were not found. Moreover, mild to moderate eye symptoms were found at baseline: itching (1.15 ± 0.85), watering (1.12 ± 0.78) and erythema (1.00 ± 0.89). Pulmonary symptoms related with asthma (dyspnoea, wheezing) were found to be not relevant and baseline FEV1 was found to be normal in most patients. Total IgE levels in serum were abnormal in 51.6 % of the measurements (277.49 ± 281.23 IU/ml). IgE anti-Dp levels in serum were 30.2 ± 33.2 KU/ml and IgE anti-Df levels were 28.4 ± 31.5 KU/ml. Seven patients continued receiving immunotherapy during the period of study.

Characteristics of the homes and cleaning practices

The types of housing and cleaning practices are summarised in table II. Most patients lived in flats older than 10 years with more than 3 rooms. Sprung mattresses were predominant and carpets, fitted carpets or mattress covers were scarce. Cleaning practices were common: 87.2 % of the patients vacuumed at least once at week. Compliance of standard environmental measures was assessed: at the beginning of the study, only 46.6 % of the patients regularly applied the measures proposed, whereas at the end of the study this percentage increased significantly to 90.0 % (p < 0.001).

Clinical symptoms

There was a significant decrease in all nasal symptoms scores, except for nasal secretion (fig. 1). Moreover, oedema and intranasal inflammation decreased significantly after 12 months (25.8 % of the patients, p < 0.001). With regard to pharyngeal symptoms, the daytime dry cough score but not the night-time dry cough score improved significantly (p < 0.03). The respiratory symptoms scores did not change during the study. Subjective self-assessment showed that 37.0 % of the patients improved after 3 months of the study whereas this percentage increased to 68.4 % after 12 months.

Figure 1.--Changes in the score of nasal symptoms. The score was rated from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). NS = non-significant. The data shown are means ± SEM.

Quality of life of patients

The overall quality of life (QoL) score improved significantly during the study period (fig. 2). The mean score decrease found was 0.86 (CI 95 %, 0.54-1.17). Five of the seven domains included in the questionnaire decreased significantly: non-hayfever symptoms (mean decrease of 0.97, CI 95 % 0.56-1.39); practical problems (1.25, CI 95 % 0.63-1.88); nasal symptoms (1.23, CI 95 % 0.70-1.76); eye symptoms (1.14, CI 95 % 0.62-1.67), and emotions (0.64, CI 95 % 0.26-1.01). These decreases were found during the first 3 months and later remained stable at lower levels than at baseline.

Figure 2.--Changes in the quality of life (QoL) of subjects studied. The score was rated from 0 (not disturbing) to 6 (extremely disturbing) except for emotions where 0 (never) and 6 (all the time). NS = non-significant. The data shown are means ± SEM.

Antigenicity of HDM

The content of guanine in dust samples decreased significantly from 2.17 ± 0.75 to 1.43 ± 0.68 (fig. 3). Overall, the presence of HDM in dust samples decreased in 70 % of the analysed homes.

Figure 3.--Changes in the antigenicity of dust samples measured from guanine content (Acarex® test). The data shown are means ± SEM

Toxicity of Frontac®

No adverse events or toxic effects were recorded during the one-year study period.

DISCUSSION

The results of the present study suggest a clinical benefit derived from the use of the tested acaricide-containing aerosol, combined with standard environmental measures, in the homes of patients suffering from perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The efficacy of an acaricide is measured as the capacity to kill adult mites but also larvae and eggs. Clinical improvement is a consequence of reduced exposure to allergen following removal by vacuum cleaning of mites killed by the acaricide. If vacuum cleaning is not done properly, large numbers of dead mites remain in the dust; they gradually disintegrate and more allergen-bearing, aerosolisable particles are generated. Therefore, although this was an open uncontrolled study it is relevant that the allergic patients achieved a satisfactory symptom control and improved their quality of life even after one year of follow-up. Long-term studies are advisable: other authors have previously found improvement in the clinical variables of patients with HDM-allergic asthma only after one year of study but not after 4 months (19). Moreover, studies performed on a one-year basis allow the detection of possible seasonal modifications.

Rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms are not life-threatening but have detrimental effects on the physical, psychological and social aspects of the patients' lives, and can decrease their quality of life significantly (20). Therefore, it is becoming increasingly accepted that both health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments and clinical measurements are needed to obtain a complete evaluation of the health status of the patients with allergic rhinitis. HRQoL data can be used to identify optimal therapeutic regimens but also to suggest practice guidelines for allergic disorders (21). The reliability of HRQoL data is highly dependent on the tool with which they are gathered: the RQLQ used here is one of the first disease-specific instruments validated to measure HRQoL in rhinoconjunctivitis (6). The RQLQ measures both physical and emotional function, reflects areas of function important to patients with rhinoconjunctivitis, provides reproducible scores amenable to statistical analysis and when the clinical status is stable it is responsive to clinical changes, even small ones. In the present study, we have found higher baseline scores for nasal/eye symptoms but also for practical problems (i.e., need to blow nose repeatedly; need to rub nose/eyes, and inconvenience of having to carry handkerchiefs). The decreases found in these and other RQLQ domains reflected that symptomatic improvement was accompanied by an improved quality of life of the patients.

An important environmental control step is to minimise HDM exposure in mite-allergic patients in order to reduce the morbidity of the allergic disease. The use of chemical acaricides supplements the HDM avoidance measures, as chemical acaricides are effective in reducing mite allergen levels (22-25). Both the wide range of allergic problems that can be caused by HDM and the ways an effective acaricide can improve them have been demonstrated in several clinical studies: some used aerosols, foams or powders containing benzyl benzoate in the home of patients with allergic rhinitis (26, 27), although most of them were performed in the homes of patients with allergic asthma (28-33). Other studies were performed using esbiol and piperonyl butoxide in the homes of patients with allergic rhinitis or asthma (34). Relapse of symptoms following exposure to untreated dusty environments was observed in many patients, thus confirming that the improvement reported was due to the removal of HDM allergen (26). Nevertheless, other studies with benzyl-benzoate failed to show significant differences versus placebo (30, 35) or environmental control alone (17) in the homes of allergic asthma patients. Therefore, the clinical relevance of the use of chemical acaricides under the variable conditions and the great diversity of HDM inhabitable niches found in the homes of allergic patients remains controversial. In many cases, products with double activity (i.e. acaricide and fungicide) are recommended (36).

The present study is the first that reports the acaricidal effectiveness and the subsequent clinical benefit of the use of Frontac® combined with environmental control for human beings. The results obtained with the Acarex® test showed the effective duration of the acaricide activity of Frontac®, since guanine content of dust samples decreased even after a year; this is a relevant finding, as an initial dramatic decrease of mite load by mechanical or chemical means is commonly followed by rapid recolonization (36) and vacuum-cleaning alone does not reduce mite numbers significantly (37). Besides, we confirmed the lack of toxicity of the chemical acaricide used in this study; this supports its use in long periods, a common procedure in the treatment of HDM-related allergic diseases.

In conclusion, the present study suggests a clinical benefit of short-term (3-months) and long-term (1-year) use of the new chemical acaricide tested, together with standard environmental measures, in the homes of patients suffering from perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without bronchial asthma. After one year, the severity of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms decreased and the quality of life of patients improved while no toxicity of the acaricide was found. Nevertheless, the present results should be treated with caution; its use as an useful and additional preventive treatment of allergic patients must be confirmed in future randomised, controlled clinical trials comparing this efficacy with that of environmental control alone or other acaricides, but also by measuring changes in HDM-allergen levels using specific immunoassays.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Gemma Medina (ATS, Institut Universitari Dexeus) for her help in the management of the study and Vicente Alfaro (Biomedical Systems Group S.A) for his help as medical writer.

Bibliography
[1]
Arlian LG..
House-dust-mite allergens: a review..
Exp Appl Acarol, 10 (1991), pp. 167-86
[2]
Sporik R, Platts-Mills TAE..
Epidemiology of dust-mite related disease..
Exp Appl Acarol, 16 (1992), pp. 141-51
[3]
Norman PS..
Allergic rhinitis..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 75 (1985), pp. 531-48
[4]
International consensus report on diagnosis and management of rhinitis. Allergy 1994;49 (Suppl. 19):1-34.
[5]
Lucente FE..
Rhinitis and nasal obstruction..
Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 22 (1989), pp. 307-18
[6]
Juniper EF, Guyath GH..
Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in rhinoconjunctivitis..
Clin Exp Allergy, 21 (1991), pp. 77-83
[7]
Juniper EF, Guyath GH, Andersson B, Ferrie PJ..
Comparison of powder and aerosolized budenoside in perennial rhinitis: validation of rhinitis quality of life questionnaire..
Ann Allergy, 70 (1993), pp. 225-30
[8]
Quantification of house-dust-mite populations. Allergy 1998;53 (Suppl 48):18-23.
[9]
American Thoracic Society..
Definition and classification of chronic bronchitis, asthma and pulmonary emphysema..
Am Rev Respir Dis, 85 (1962), pp. 762-8
[10]
Kalpaklioglu AF, Ferizli AG, Misirligil Z, Demirel YS, Gurbuz L..
The effectiveness of benzyl benzoate and different chemicals as acaricides..
Allergy, 51 (1996), pp. 164-70
[11]
Kakko I, Toimela T, Taht.i, H..
Piperonyl butoxide potentiates the synaptosome ATPase inhibiting effect pyrethrin..
Chemosphere, 40 (2000), pp. 301-5
[12]
Dornelas A, Birnbaum J, Lanteaume A, Izard JL, Corge P, Artillan MF et al..
Housing and house dust mites..
Allergy, 50 (1995), pp. 142-6
[13]
House dust mite allergy and anti-mite measures in the indoor environment. Allergy 1991;46(Suppl 11):33-8.
[14]
Platts-Mills TA, Chapman MD..
Dust mites: immunology, allergic disease, and environmental control..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 80 (1987), pp. 755-79
[15]
Bronswi JW, Jemhva N, Bischoff E et al..
Evaluating mite (Acari) allergenicity of house dust by guanine quantification..
J Med Entomol, 26 (1989), pp. 55-9
[16]
LeMao J, Pauli G, Tekaia F, Hoyet C, Bishoff E, David B..
Guanine content and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergens in house dust samples..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 83 (1989), pp. 926-33
[17]
Bahir A, Goldberg A, Mekori YA, Confino-Cohen R, Morag H, Rosen Y et al..
Continuous avoidance measures with or without acaricide in dust mite-allergic asthmatic children..
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 78 (1997), pp. 506-12
[18]
Diagnosis of house dust mite allergy. Allergy 1991;46 (suppl 11):19-22.
[19]
Walshaw MJ, Evans CC..
Allergen avoidance in house dust mite sensitive adult asthma..
Quart J Med, 58 (1986), pp. 199-215
[20]
Juniper EF..
Impact of upper respiratory allergic diseases on quality of life..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 101 (1998), pp. S386-S391
[21]
A pharmacological continuum in the treatment of rhinorrhea: the clinician as economist. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;95(5 pt 2):1147-52.
[22]
Tovey ER, Mark GB, Matthews M, Green WF, Woolcock A..
Changes in mite allergen Der p I in house dust following spraying with a tannic acid/acaricide solution..
Clin Exp Allergy, 22 (1992), pp. 67-74
[23]
Hart BJ, Guerin B, Nolard N..
In vitro evaluation of acaricide and fungicidal activity of the house dust mite acaricide, Allerbiocid..
Clin Exp Allergy, 22 (1992), pp. 923-8
[24]
Warner JA, Marchant JL, Warner JO..
Allergen avoidance in the homes of atopic asthmatic children: The effect of Allersearch DMS..
Clin Exp Allergy, 23 (1993), pp. 279-86
[25]
Ridout S, Twiselton R, Matthews S, Stevens M, Matthews L, Arshad SH et al..
Acarosan and Acarex test in the control of house dust mite allergens in the home..
Br J Clin Pract, 47 (1993), pp. 141-4
[26]
Brown HM, Merrett TG..
Effectiveness of an acaricide in management of house dust mite allergy..
Ann Allergy, 67 (1991), pp. 25-31
[27]
Kneist FM, Young E, van Praag MC.G, Vos H, Korst HS.M, Koers WJ et al..
Clinical evaluation of a double-blind dust-mite avoidance trial with mite-allergic rhinitis patients..
Clin Exp Allergy, 21 (1991), pp. 39-47
[28]
Dietemann A, Bessot JC, Hoyet C, Ott M, Verot A, Pauli G..
A double-blind, placebo controlled trial of solidified benzyl benzoate applied in dwellings of asthmatic patients sensitive to mites: clinical efficacy and effect on mite allergens..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 91 (1993), pp. 738-46
[29]
Chew FT, Goh DY, Lee BW..
Effects of an acaricide on mite allergen levels in the homes of asthmatic children..
Acta Paediatr Jpn, 38 (1996), pp. 483-8
[30]
Sette L, Comis A, Marcucci F, Sensi L, Piacentini GL, Boner AL..
Benzyl-benzoate foam: effects on mite allergens in mattress, serum and nasal secretory IgE to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and bronchial hyperreactivity in children with allergic asthma..
Pediatr Pulmonol, 18 (1994), pp. 218-27
[31]
Van der Heide S, Kauffman HF, Dubois AE.J, de Monchy JGR..
Allergen-avoidance measures in homes of house-dust-mite-allergic asthmatic patients: effects of acaricides and mattress encasings..
Allergy, 52 (1997), pp. 921-7
[32]
Kroidl RF, Göbel D, Balzer D, Trendelenburg F, Schwichtenberg U..
Clinical effects of benzyl benzoate in the prevention of house-dust-mite allergy..
Allergy, 53 (1998), pp. 435-40
[33]
Custovic A, Simpson BM, Simpson A, Hallam C, Craven M, Brutsche M et al..
Manchester asthma and allergy study: low-allergen environment can be achieved and maintained during pregnancy and in early life..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 105 (2000), pp. 252-8
[34]
Geller-Bernstein C, Pibourdin JM, Dornelas A, Fondarai J..
Efficacy of the acaricide: acardust for the prevention of asthma and rhinitis due to dust mite allergy, in children..
Allerg Immunol (Paris), 27 (1995), pp. 147-54
[35]
Carswell F, Birmingham K, Oliver J, Crewes A, Weeks J..
The respiratory effects of reduction of mite allergen in the bedrooms of asthmatic children ­ a double-blind controlled trial..
Clin Exper Allergy, 26 (1996), pp. 386-96
[36]
Schober G, Kniest FM, Kort HS.M, Saint Georges Gridelet DM, van Bronswijk JE..
Comparative efficacy of house dust mite extermination products..
Clin Exp Allergy, 22 (1992), pp. 618-26
[37]
Wassenaar DPJ..
Reducing house dust mites by vacuuming..
Expl Appl Acarol, 4 (1988), pp. 167-71
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos