Información del artículo
Resumen
En el presente artículo se extraen, apartir de los datos y experiencia expuestos, una serie de conceptos generales que se han destacado a lo largo del texto bajo laforma de consideracionesy recomendaciones para la utilización de la eco-Doppler en el cribado de la patología vasculorrenaly seguimiento de la revascularización renal. No obstante, es necesario recordar que los protocolosy criterios diagnósticos deben ser adaptadosy reevaluados por cada Laborotario. Sólo de estaformaes posible obtener resultados óptimos en su aplicación clínica.
Palabras clave:
Control no invasivo
Cirugía aortoilíaca
Cirugía carotídea
Cirugíafemo-ropoplítea
Cirugía visceral
Summary
In this paper we give a series of general concepts based on the data and experience described. Throughout the text there we discuss the use of eco-Doppler in the screening for vasculorenal pathology and follow-up of renal revascularization. However, it must be remembered that the protocols and diagnostic criteria should be adapted and reevaluated by each individual laboratory. Only in this way can the best results be obtained in clinical practice.
Key words:
Aortoiliacsurgery
Carotidsurgery
Femoropoplitealsurgical
Non-invasive control
Visceral surgery
Resumo
No presente artigo extraem-se, a partir dos dados e das experiências expostas, umasérie de conceitos gerais que se destacaram ao longo do texto sob a forma de considerares e recomendações para a utilização da ecografia Dopplerno exame da patologia vascular renal e seguimento da revascularização renal. No entanto, é necessário, recordar que os protocolos e criterios de diagnóstico devem seradaptados e reavaliadospor cada Laboratório. Apenas desta forma, é possível obter resultados óptimos na sua aplicação clínica.
Palavras chave:
Controlo nao invasivo
Cirurgia aortoilíaca
Cirurgia carotídea
Cirurgia femoropoplítea
Cirurgia visceral
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis.
N Engl J Med, 325 (1991), pp. 445-453
[2.]
Executive Committee for Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
JAMA, 273 (1995), pp. 1421-1428
[3.]
Roth S.M., Back M.R., Bandyck D.F., Avino A.J., Riley V., Johnson B.L..
A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg, 30 (1999), pp. 453-460
[4.]
Bernstein E.F., Torem S., Dilley R.B..
Does carotid reestenosis predict an increased risk of late symptoms, stroke or death?.
Ann Surg, 212 (1990), pp. 629-636
[5.]
Nichols S.C., Phillips D.J., Bergelin R.O., Beach K.W., Primozich J.F., Strandness D.E. Jr..
Carotid endarterectomy: relationship of outcome to early restenosis.
J Vasc Surg, 2 (1985), pp. 375-381
[6.]
Cook J.M., Thompson B.W., Barnes R.W..
Is routine duplex examination after carotid endarterectomy justified?.
J Vasc Surg, 12 (1990), pp. 334-340
[7.]
Mattos M.A., van Bemmelen P.S., Barkmeier L.D., Hodgson K.J., Ramsey D.E., Summer D.S..
Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: does it affect clinical management?.
J Vasc Surg, 17 (1993), pp. 819-831
[8.]
Lattimer C.R., Burnan K.G..
Recurrent carotid stenosis after endarterectomy.
Br J Surg, 84 (1997), pp. 1206-1219
[9.]
Frericks H., Kievit J., van Baalen J.M., van Bockel J.H..
Carotid recurrent stenosis and risk of ipsilateral stroke. A systematic review of the literature.
Stroke, 29 (1998), pp. 244-250
[10.]
Samson R.H., Shoealter D.P., Yunis J.P., Dorsay D.A., Kulman H.I., Silverman S.R..
Hemodynamically significant early recurrent carotidstenosis: An often self-limiting and self-reversing condition.
J Vasc Surg, 30 (1999), pp. 446-452
[11.]
Golledge J., Cumung R., Ellis M., Beatie D.K., Davies A.H., Greenhalgh R.M..
Clinical follow-up rather then duplex surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg, 25 (1997), pp. 55-63
[12.]
Satani B., Chen T.Y., Shook L., Finnie K..
Contralateral disease progresion after carotid endarterectomy.
Surgery, 114 (1993), pp. 46-51
[13.]
Ricotta J.J., O'Brien-Irr M.S..
Conservative management of residual and recurrent lesions after carotid endarterectomy: long term results.
J Vasc Surg, 26 (1997), pp. 963-972
[14.]
Carballo R.E., Towne J.B., Seabrook G.R., Freischlag J.A., Cambria R.A..
An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis.
J Vasc Surg, 23 (1996), pp. 749-754
[15.]
O'Donnell T.F., Rodríguez A.A., Fortunato J.E., Welch H.J., Mackey W.C..
Management of recurrent carotid stenosis: should asymptomatic lesions be treated surgically?.
J Vasc Surg, 24 (1996), pp. 207-212
[17.]
Schwarcz T.H., Yates G.N., Ghobrial M., Baker W.H..
Pathologic characteristics of recurrent carotid artery stenosis.
J Vasc Surg, 5 (1987), pp. 280-288
[18.]
Treiman G.S., Jenkins J.M., Edwards W.H., Barlow W., Edwards W.H. Jr., Martin R.S. III, et al.
The evolving surgical management of recurrent carotid stenosis.
J Vasc Surg, 16 (1992), pp. 354-363
[19.]
Ricotta J.J..
Is routine ultasound surveillance after carotid endartrectomy worthwhile?.
Am J Surg, 172 (1996), pp. 140-143
[20.]
Patel S.T., Kuntz K.M., Kent K.C..
Is routine duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy cost-effective?.
Surgery, 124 (1998), pp. 343-352
[21.]
Hallet J.W. Jr., Marshall D.M., Petterson T.M., Gray D.T., Bower T.C., et al.
Graft-related complications after abdominal aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year population-based experience.
J Vasc Surg, 25 (1997), pp. 277-284
[22.]
Demarche M., Waltregny D., van Damme H., Limet R..
Femoral anastomotic aneurysms: pathogenic factors, clinical presentations and treatment. A study of 142 cases.
Cardiovasc Surg, 7 (1999), pp. 315-322
[23.]
Kalman P.G., Rappaport D.C., Merchant N., Clarke K., Johnston K.W..
The value of late computed tomographic scanning in identification of vascular abnormalities after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
J Vasc Surg, 29 (1999), pp. 442-450
[24.]
Swartbol P., Alberchtsson U., Parsson H., Norgren L..
Dilatation of aorto-bifemoral knitted Dacron grafts after a mean implantation of 5 years.
Int Angiol, 15 (1996), pp. 236-239
[25.]
Lingush J. Jr., Criado E., Burnham S.J., Johnson G., Keagy B.A..
Management and outcome of chronic atherosclerotic infrarenal aortic occlusion.
J Vasc Surg, 24 (1996), pp. 394-404
[26.]
Harris R.A., Hardman D.T., Fisher C., Lane R., Appleberg M..
Aortic reconstructive surgery for limb ischaemia: immediate and long term follow-up to provide a standard for endovascular procedures.
Cardiovasc Surg, 6 (1998), pp. 256-261
[27.]
Bastounis E., Felekouras E., Pikoulis E., Hanjinikolaou L., Georgopoulos S..
The role of profunda femoris revascularization in aortofemoral surgery. An analysis of factors affecting graft patency.
Int Angiol, 16 (1997), pp. 107-113
[28.]
UK Small Trial Participants.
Mortality results for randomised controled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Lancet, 352 (1998), pp. 1649-1655
[29.]
Lipski D.A., Ernst C.B..
Natural history of the residual infrarenal aorta after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
J Vasc Surg, 27 (1998), pp. 805-811
[30.]
De Gier P., Sommeling C., van Dulken E., Truyen E., Burh J..
Stenosis developement at the distal anastomosis of prosthetic bypasses for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Incidence and accuracy of colour duplex in the diagnosis.
Eur J Vasc Surg, 7 (1993), pp. 237-244
[31.]
Ramaswami G., Dhanjil S., Nicolaides A.N., Griffin M., Al-Kutoubi A., et al.
Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
Am J Surg, 176 (1998), pp. 102-108
[32.]
Spijkerboer A.M., Nass P.C., de Valois J.C., Eikelboom B.C., Overtoom T.T., et al.
Iliac artery stenes after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: follow-up with duplex ultrasonography.
J Vasc Surg, 23 (1996), pp. 691-697
[33.]
Tielbeek A.V., Rietjens E., Buth J., Vroegindeweij D., Schol F.P..
The value of duplex surveillance after endovascular intervention for femoropopliteal obstructive disease.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 12 (1996), pp. 145-150
[34.]
Spijerboer A.M., Nass P.C., de Valois J.C., van der Graaf Y., Eikelboom B.C..
Evaluation of femoropopliteal arteries with duplex ultrasound after angioplasty Can we predict results at one year?.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 12 (1996), pp. 418-423
[35.]
Winter-Warnars H.A.O., van der Graaft Y., Mali W.P..
Ankle-arm index, angiography and duplex ultrasonography after recanalization of occlusions in femoropopliteal arteries: comparison of long-term results.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 19 (1996), pp. 234-238
[36.]
Lie T., Lundbom J., Hatlinghus S., Gronningsaeter A., Ommendal S., et al.
Ultrasound imaging during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the Stentor bifurcated endograft.
J Endovasc Surg, 4 (1997), pp. 272-278
[37.]
Zanetti P. Cao, P.G. Duplex follow-up of aortic endograft. [Serie no publicada].
[38.]
Heilberger P., Schunn C., Ritter W., Weber S., Raithel D..
Postoperative colour flow duplex scanning in aortic endografting.
J Endovasc Surg, 4 (1997), pp. 263-271
[39.]
McWilliams R.G., Martin J., White D., Gould D.A., Harris P.L., et al.
Use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
J Vasc Interv Radiol, 10 (1999), pp. 1107-1114
[40.]
Breslau R.C., DeWeese J.A..
Successful endophlebectomy of autogenous venous bypass grafts.
Ann Surg, 162 (1965), pp. 251-254
[41.]
McNamara J.J., Darling R.C., Linton R.R..
Segmental stenosis of saphenous vein autograft.
N Engl J Med, 277 (1967), pp. 290-292
[42.]
Szilagyi D.E., Elliot J.P., Hageman J.H., Smith R.F., Dall'Olmo C.A..
Biological fate of autologous vein implants as arterial substitutes.
Ann Surg, 178 (1973), pp. 232-246
[43.]
Veith F.J., Weiser R.K., Gupta S.K., Ascer E., Scher L.A., Samson R.H., et al.
Diagnosis and management of failing lower extremity arterial reconstruction prior to graft occlusion.
J Cardiovasc Surg, 25 (1984), pp. 381-384
[44.]
Acín F., Guilleuma J., De Benito L., March J.R..
Injertos en riesgo, pp. 83-90
[45.]
Dunlop P., Sayers R.D., Naylor A.R., Bell P.R.F., London N.J.M..
The effect of a surveillance programme on the patency of synthetic infrainguinal bypass grafts.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 11 (1996), pp. 441-445
[46.]
Lalak N.J., Hanel K.C., Hunt J., Morgan A..
Duplex scan surveillance of infrainguinal prosthetic bypass grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 20 (1994), pp. 637-641
[47.]
Sánchez L.A., Gupta S.K., Veith F.J., Goldsmith J., Lyon R.T., Wengerter K.R., et al.
A ten-year experience with one hundred fifty failing or threatened vein and polytetra fluoethylene arterial bypass grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 14 (1991), pp. 729-738
[48.]
Moody P., De Cossart L.M., Douglas H.M., Harris P.L..
Asymptomatic strictures in femoropopliteal vein grafts.
Eur J Vasc Surg, 3 (1989), pp. 389-392
[49.]
Taylor P.R., Wolfe J.H.N., Tyrrell M.R., Mansfield A.O., Nicolaides A.N., Houston R.E..
Graft stenosis: justification for 1-year surveillance.
Br J Surg, 77 (1990), pp. 1125-1128
[50.]
Varty K., Allen K.E., Bell P.R.F., London N.J.M..
Infrainguinal vein graft stenosis.
Br J Surg, 80 (1993), pp. 825-833
[51.]
Wilson Y.G., Davies A.H., Currie I.C., Morgan M., McGrath C., Baird R.N., Lamont P.M..
Vein graft stenosis: incidence and intervention.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 11 (1996), pp. 164-169
[52.]
Buth J., Diesselhoff B., Sommeling C., Stam L..
Color-flow duplex criteria for grading stenosis in infrainguinal vein grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 14 (1991), pp. 716-728
[53.]
Grigg M.J., Nicolaides A.N., Wolfe J.H.N..
Detection and grading of femorodistal vein graftstenosis: duplex velocity measurements compared with angiography.
J Vasc Surg, 8 (1998), pp. 661-666
[54.]
Bergamini T.M., George S.M., Massey H.T., Henke P.K., Klamer T.W., Lambert G.E., et al.
Intensive surveillance of femoropoplitealtibial autogenous vein bypasses improves long-term graft patency and limb salvage.
Ann Surg, 221 (1995), pp. 507-516
[55.]
Belkin M., Donaldson M.C., Whittemore A.D., et al.
Observations on the use of thrombolytic agents for thrombotic occlusions of infrainguinal vein grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 11 (1990), pp. 289-294
[56.]
Idu M.M., Buth J..
Postoperative infrainguinal bypass graft surveillance: state of the Art.
Vasc Surg, 31 (1997), pp. 115-121
[57.]
Nielsen T.G., Vogt K.C., Rasmussen J.G., Schroeder T.V..
Five-years experience with revision of failing peripheral vein bypasses.
Vasc Surg, 33 (1999), pp. 73-80
[58.]
Bandyk D.F., Bergamini T.M., Towne J.B., Schmitt D.D., Seabrook G.R..
Durability of vein graft revision: the outcome of secondary procedures.
J Vasc Surg, 13 (1991), pp. 200-210
[59.]
Bandyk D.F., Schmitt D.D., Seabrook G.R., Adams M.B., Towne J.B..
Monitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypass: the impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision.
J Vasc Surg, 9 (1989), pp. 286-296
[60.]
Laborde A.L., Synn A.Y., Worsey M.J., et al.
A prospective comparison of ankle/brachial indices and color duplex imaging in surveillance of in situ saphenous vein bypass.
J Cardiovasc Surg, 33 (1992), pp. 420-425
[61.]
Westerband A., Mills J.L., Kistler S., Berman S.S., Hunter G.C., Marek J.M..
Prospective validation of threshold criteria for interventionin infrainguinal vein grafts undergoing duplex surveillance.
Ann Vasc Surg, 11 (1997), pp. 44-48
[62.]
Idu M.M., Buth J., Hop W.C.J., Cuypers P., vander Pavoordt E.D.W.M., Tordoir J.M.H..
Vein graft surveillance: Is graft revision without angiography justified and what criteria should be used?.
J Vasc Surg, 27 (1998), pp. 399-413
[63.]
Moody P., Gould D.A., Harris P.L..
Vein graft surveillance improves patency in femoropopliteal bypass.
Eur J Vasc Surg, 4 (1990), pp. 117-121
[64.]
Diesselhoff B., Buth J., Jakimowicz J..
Early detection of stenosis in femorodistal grafts. A Surveillance study using color-duplex scanning.
Eur J Vasc Surg, 3 (1989), pp. 43-48
[65.]
Bandyk D.F., Seabrook G.R., Moldenhauer P., Lavin J., Edwards J., Cato R., Towne J.B..
Hemodynamics of vein graft stenosis.
J Vasc Surg, 8 (1988), pp. 688-695
[66.]
Wolfe J.H., Thomas M.L., Jamieson C.W., Browse N.L., Burnand K.G., Rutt D.L..
Early diagnosis of femorodistal graft stenoses.
Br J Surg, 74 (1987), pp. 268-270
[67.]
Mills J.L., Harris E.J., Taylor L.M. Jr., Beckett W.C., Porter J.M..
The importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning: a study of 379 reversed vein grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 12 (1990), pp. 379-389
[68.]
Sladen J.G., Gilmour J.L..
Vein graft stenosis: characteristics and effects of treatment.
Am J Surg, 141 (1981), pp. 549-553
[69.]
Barnes R.W., Thompson B.W., MacDonald C.M., Nix M.L., Lambeth A., Nix A.D., et al.
Serial noninvasive studies do not herald postoperative failure of femorotibial bypass grafts.
Ann Surg, 210 (1989), pp. 486-494
[70.]
Lewis D.R., McGrath C., Irvine C.D., Jones A., Murphy P., Smith F.C.T., et al.
The progression and correction of duplex detected velocity shifts in angiographically normal vein grafts.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 15 (1998), pp. 394-397
[71.]
Caps M.T., Cantwell-Gab K., Bergelin R.O., Strandness D.E. Jr..
Vein graft lesions: time of onset and rate of progression.
J Vasc Surg, 22 (1995), pp. 466-475
[72.]
O'Mara C.S., Flinn W.R., Johnson N.D., Bergan J.J., Yao J.S..
Recognition and surgical management of patent but hemodynamically failed arterial grafts.
Ann Surg, 193 (1981), pp. 467-476
[73.]
Hoch J.R., Tullis M.J., Kennell T.W., McDermott J., Acher C.W., Turnipseed W.D..
Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.
J Vasc Surg, 23 (1996), pp. 792-801
[74.]
Bebdib K., Berthezène Y., Croisille P., Villard J., Douek P.C..
Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: value of contrast-enhanced substraction magnetic resonance angiography.
J Vasc Surg, 26 (1997), pp. 1036-1042
[75.]
Bandyk D.F., Kaebnick H.W., Bergamini T.M., Moldenhauer P., Towne J.B..
Hemodynamics of in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass.
Arch Surg, 123 (1988), pp. 477-482
[76.]
Lundell A., Lindblad B., Bergqvist D., Hansen F..
Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improve by an intensive surveillance programme.
J Vasc Surg, 21 (1995), pp. 26-34
[77.]
Mattos M.A., van Bemmelen P.S., Hodgson K.J., Ramsey D.E., Barkmeier L.D., Sumner D.S..
Does correction of stenosis identified by color duplex scanning improve infrainguinal graft patency?.
J Vasc Surg, 17 (1993), pp. 54-66
[78.]
Davies A.H., Magee T.R., Tennant S.G.W., Lamont P.M., Baird R.N., Horrocks M..
Criteria for identification of the ‘at-risk’ infrainguinal bypass graft.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 8 (1994), pp. 315-319
[79.]
Passman M.A., Moneta G.L., Nehler M.R., Taylor L.M., Edwards J.M., Yeager R.A., et al.
Do normal early color-flow duplex surveillance examination results of infrainguinal vein grafts preclude the need for late graft revision?.
J Vasc Surg, 22 (1995), pp. 476-484
[80.]
Idu M.M., Blankensteyn J.D., de Gier P., Truyen E., Buth J..
Impact of a color-flow duplex surveillance programme on infrainguinal vein graft patency.
J Vasc Surg, 17 (1993), pp. 42-53
[81.]
Sladen J.G., Reid J.D.S., Cooperberg P.L., Harrison P.B., Maxwell T.M., Riggs M.O., et al.
Color flow duplex screening of infrainguinal grafts combining low- and high-velocity criteria.
Am J Surg, 158 (1989), pp. 107-112
[83.]
Olojugba D.H., McCarthy M.J., Naylor A.R., Bell P.R.F., London N.J.M..
At what peak velocity ratio should duplex-detected infrainguinal vein graft stenosis be revised?.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 15 (1998), pp. 258-260
[84.]
Ihlberg L., Luther M., Tierala E., Lepäntalo M..
The utility of duplex scanning in infrainguinal vein graft surveillance: results from a randomised controlled study.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 16 (1998), pp. 19-27
[85.]
Loftus I.M., Reid A., Thompson M.M., London N.J., Bell P.R., Naylor A.R..
The increasing workload required to maintain infrainguinal bypass graft patency.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 15 (1998), pp. 337-341
[86.]
Papanicolau G., Aziz I., Yellin A.E., Weaver F.A..
Intraoperative color Duplex scanning for infrainguinal vein grafts.
Ann Vasc Surg, 10 (1996), pp. 347-355
[87.]
Wilson Y.G., Davies A.H., Morgan M., Currie I.C., McGrath C., Baird R.N., et al.
miralleshernández. The value of pre-discharge duplex scanning in infrainguinal graft surveillance.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 10 (1995), pp. 237-242
[88.]
Nielsen T.G., Jensen L.P., Schroeder T.V..
Earlyvein bypass thrombectomy is associated with an increased risk of graft related stenoses.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 13 (1997), pp. 134-138
[89.]
Treiman G.S., Lawrence P.F., Galt S.W., Kraiss L.W..
Revision of reversed infrainguinal bypass grafts without preoperative angiography.
J Vasc Surg, 26 (1997), pp. 1020-1028
[90.]
Dunlop P., Hartshorne T., Bolia A., Bell P.R.F., London N.J.M..
The long-term outcome of infrainguinal vein graft surveillance.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 10 (1995), pp. 352-355
[91.]
Gahtan V., Payne L.P., Roper L.D., Mills J.L., Jackson M.M., Bandyk D.F..
Duplex criteria for predicting progression of vein graft lesions: Which stenosis can be followed?.
J Vasc Tech, 19 (1995), pp. 211-215
[92.]
Idu M.M., Buth J., Cuypers P., Hop W.C.J., van der Pavoordt E.D.W.M., Tordoir J.M.H..
Economizing vein-surveillance programs.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 15 (1998), pp. 432-438
[93.]
Mills J.L., Gahtan V., Bandyk D.F., Esses G.E..
The origin of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis: a prospective study based on duplex surveillance.
J Vasc Surg, 21 (1995), pp. 16-25
[94.]
Calligaro K.D., Syrek J.R., Dougherty M.J., Rua I., McAfee-Bennett S., Doerr K.J., et al.
Selective use of duplex ultrasound to replace preoperative angiography for failing arterial vein grafts.
J Vasc Surg, 27 (1998), pp. 89-95
[95.]
Landry G.J., Moneta G.L., Taylor L.M., McLafferty R.B., Edwards J.M., Yeager R.A., et al.
Duplex scanning alone is not sufficient imaging before secondary procedures after lower extremity reversed vein bypass graft.
J Vasc Surg, 29 (1999), pp. 270-281
[96.]
Mills J.L..
The impact of duplex surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypass surgery.
pp. 201-210
[97.]
Calligaro K.D., Musser D.J., Chen A.Y., Dougherty M.J., McAffee-Bennett S., Doerr K.J., et al.
Duplex ultrasonography to diagnose failing arterial prosthetic grafts.
Surgery, 120 (1996), pp. 455-459
[98.]
Xue F., Bettmann M.A., Langdon D.R., Wivell W.A..
Outcome and cost comparison of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty, renal arterial stent placement, and renal arterial bypass grafting.
Radiology, 212 (1999), pp. 378-384
[99.]
Taylor D.C., Houston T.M., Anderson C., Jameson M., Popatia S..
Follow-up of renal and mesenteric artery revascularization with duplex ultrasonography.
Can J Surg, 39 (1996), pp. 5-6
[100.]
Melany M.L., Grant E.G., Duerinckx A.J., Watts T.M., Levine B.S..
Ability of a phase shift US contrast agent to improve imaging of the main renal arteries.
Radiology, 205 (1997), pp. 147-152
[101.]
Missouris C.G., Allen C.M., Balen F.G., Buckenham T., Lees W.R., MacGregor G.A..
Noninvasive screening for renal artery stenosis with ultrasound contrast enhancement.
J Hypertens, 14 (1996), pp. 519-524
[102.]
Faenza B., Spolaore R., Poggioli G., et al.
Renal artery stenosis after renal transplantation.
Kidney Int, 14 (1983), pp. 54S
[103.]
Taylor D.C., Kettler M.D., Moneta G.L., Kohler T.R., Kazmers A., Beach K.W., et al.
Duplex ultrasound scanning in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a prospective evaluation.
J Vasc Surg, 7 (1988), pp. 363-369
[104.]
Snider J.F., Hunter D.W., Moradian G.P., Castaneda-Zuniga W.R., Letourneau J.G..
Transplant renal artery stenosis: evaluation with duplex ultrasonography.
Radiology, 17 (1989), pp. 1027-1030
[105.]
Erley C.M., Duda S.H., Wakat J.P., Sokler M., Reuland P., Muller-Schauenburg W., et al.
Noninvasive procedures for diagnosis of renovascular hypertension in renal transplant recipients: a prospective analysis.
Transplantation, 54 (1992), pp. 863-867
[106.]
Peterson L., Blackburn D., Astleford P., et al.
Duplex evaluation of renal transplant perfusion.
J Vasc Techn, 13 (1989), pp. 79
[107.]
Norris C.S., Pfeiffer J.S., Rittgers S.E., Barnes R.W..
Noninvasive evaluation of renal artery stenosis and renovascular resistance.
J Vasc Surg, 1 (1984), pp. 192-201
[108.]
Messing E., Kessler R., Kavaney P.B..
Renal arteriovenous fistulas.
Urology, 8 (1976), pp. 101
[109.]
Hubsch P.J., Mostbeck G., Barton P.P., Gritzmann N., Fruehwald F.X., Schurawitzki H., et al.
Evaluation of arteriovenous fistulas and presudoaneurysms in renal allografts following percutaneous needle biopsy. Colorcoded Doppler sonography versus duplex Doppler sonography.
J Ultrasound Med, 9 (1990), pp. 95-100
Copyright © 2001. SEACV
