Información de la revista
Vol. 53. Núm. 3.
Páginas 202-205 (enero 2001)
Vol. 53. Núm. 3.
Páginas 202-205 (enero 2001)
Acceso a texto completo
Regulaciones y requisitos para la introducción de nueva tecnología
Visitas
2112
J.D. Beard1
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
Thomas S.M., Gaines P.A., Beard J.D..
en nombre de la Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland y la British Society of Interventional Radiologists. Short term (30 days) outcome of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: results from a prospective Registry of Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms (RETA).
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 21 (2001), pp. 3-5
[2.]
Surgical innovation under scrutiny.
Lancet, 342 (1993), pp. 167-168
[3.]
Thompson M.M., Sayers R.D., Bell P.R.F..
Endovascular aneurysm repair. Proof before publicity.
Br Med J, 314 (1997), pp. 1139-1140
[4.]
Riepe G., Chafke N., Kaiser E., Birken L., Morlock M., Delling M., et al.
What must we learn from the degradation of yesterday's endovascular devices?, Presentado en el 14 Congreso Anual de la European Society for Vascular Surgery, (2000),
[5.]
Altensfetter C..
Regulating healthcare technologies and medical supplies in the European economic arena.
Health Pol, 35 (1996), pp. 33-52
[6.]
Fleurette F..
Confusion over whether new technologies should be regulated at European or state level.
Br Med J, 318 (1996), pp. 1486-1487
[7.]
Advisory Council on Science and Technology.
A report on medical research and health, Office of Science and Technology, (1993),
[8.]
Sheldon T.A., Faulkner A..
Vetting new technologics.
Br Med J, 313 (1996), pp. 508
[9.]
Boer A..
Assessment and regulation of health care technology. The Dutch experience.
Int J Tech Assess Health Care, 15 (1999), pp. 634-648
[10.]
Giacomini M.K..
The which-hunt: assembling health technologies for assessment and rationing.
J Health Polit Policy Law, 24 (1999), pp. 759-762
[11.]
Harris P.L..
the Joint Working Party of the Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland y the British Society of Interventional Radiologists.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 78 (1996), pp. 23-24
[12.]
Jensen L.P., Troeng T..
Vascular registries: are they worth the effort?.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 20 (2000), pp. 225-226
[13.]
Cuypers P., Buth J., Harris P.L., Gevers E., Lahey R..
Realistic expectations for patients with stentgraft treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results of a European multicentre registry.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 17 (1999), pp. 507-516
[14.]
Mowatt G., Bower D.J., Brebner J.A., Cairns J.A., Grant A.M., McKee L..
When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies.
Health Technol Assess, 1 (1997), pp. 1-149
[15.]
Feinstein A.R..
An additional basic science for clinical medicine II. The limitations of randomised trials.
Ann Int Med, 99 (1983), pp. 544-550
[16.]
Russell I..
Evaluating new surgical procedures.
Br Med J, 311 (1995), pp. 1247-1248
[17.]
Lilford R.J., Braunholtz D.A., Greenhalgh R., Edwards S.J..
Trials and fast changing technologies; the case for tracker trials.
Br Med J, 320 (2000), pp. 43-46
Copyright © 2001. SEACV