metricas
covid
Buscar en
Atención Primaria
Toda la web
Inicio Atención Primaria One hundred eighty days maintenance of information in basic life support trainin...
Información de la revista
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Scientific letters
Acceso a texto completo
One hundred eighty days maintenance of information in basic life support training in primary education in a rural environment
180 días de mantenimiento de la Información en Formación de Soporte Vital Básico en Educación Primaria en un Entorno Rural
Visitas
45
Rebeca Cunhaa,,
Autor para correspondencia
cunha.rebeca@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, João Lopes Guedesb,, Luiz Miguel Santiagoc
a USF Trilhos Dueça, Rua 25 de Abril 31, 3220-185 Miranda do Corvo, Portugal
b USF Santo André de Poiares, Avenida dos Bombeiros Voluntários, 3350-152 Vila Nova de Poiares, Portugal
c Centro de Estudos e Investigação em Saúde da Universidade de Coimbra, Avenida Dr. Dias da Silva 185, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Sample characterization and results.
Texto completo

Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, its survival rates ranging from 2% to 20%.1,2

The most effective prevention of cells death is the early restoration of oxygen supply through basic life support (BLS) in the form of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with eventual defibrillation.2

According to the “Kids Save Lives” declaration on CPR education approved by the World Health Organization, “teaching CPR to all students will lead to a marked improvement in global health”.3

The aim of this study was to train elementary school students in BLS in the event of adult CPR and to assess their knowledge of the subject before the training session and the acquisition and maintenance of knowledge seven days and 180 days afterwards.

A six-month longitudinal cohort study was carried out between September 2023 and April 2024 on children aged between five and twelve from three elementary school in a rural setting.

An interactive learning and training session on the topic was held, based on the 2021 ERC Resuscitation Guidelines,4 adapted to these ages, lasting 90min, by two Family Medicine doctors, the same supporting presentation being used for all sessions in three different schools who accepted the invitation to participate. Pupils were only included after parent's written authorization. A questionnaire was administered before the sessions and 7 days and 180 days afterwards.

The questionnaire was adapted and validated after authorization from the original authors.3

Statistical analysis was made using SPSS v27, with non-parametric descriptive and inferential statistics. The study received a positive opinion from the Ethics Committee of the Centro Regional Health Administration.

One hundred seventy-three students took part in the study, with an average age of 7.7±1.2 years, 92 (53.2%) being male.

The average number of correct answers in the first assessment was 3.7±1.3, 7 days later it was 6.7±1.8 and 180 later it was 6.1±1.7 (Table 1), significantly different between the assessments (p<0.001).

Table 1.

Sample characterization and results.

  1st evaluation(n=173)  2nd evaluation(n=173)  3rd evaluation(n=160)  p-Value 
Participants by gender
Male  92 (53.2%)  92 (53.2%)  83 (51.9%)  0.963a
Female  81 (46.8%)  81 (46.8%)  77 (48.1%) 
Participants by grade
1st grade  27 (15.6%)  27 (15.6%)  27 (16.9%)  0.972b
2nd grade  48 (27.7%)  48 (27.7%)  43 (26.9%) 
3rd grade  50 (28.9%)  50 (28.9%)  47 (29.4%) 
4th grade  48 (27.7%)  48 (27.7%)  43 (26.9%) 
Average score by grade
1st grade  3.1±1.5Median 3  6.4±2.1Median 7  4.9±1.6Median 5  0.002b
2nd grade  3.9±1.2Median 4  6.3±1.6Median 6  4.9±1.6Median 5 
3rd grade  3.7±1.3Median 3.5  6.8±1.8Median 7  6.6±1.4Median 7 
4th grade  3.7±1.3Median 3.5  7.3±1.6Median 8  6.5±1.7Median 6 
Average score by gender
Male  3.7±1.3Median 4  5.9±1.6Median 6  5.9±1.7Median 6  0.037a
Female  3.7±1.2Median 4  6.3±1.7Median 6  6.3±1.7Median 6 
Average score  3.7±1.3  6.7±1.78  6.1±1.7  <0.001b 

a Mann–Whitney U test.

b Kruskal–Wallis test.

By school grade, significant differences were found in the 2nd and 3rd assessments (p=0.040 and p<0.001, respectively), students in more advanced classes obtaining better results.

By gender, significant differences were only found in the 2nd assessment (p=0.016), females showing better results than males (6.3±1.7 and 5.9±1.6, respectively).

There were positive trends in the correct answers to all the questions from the first to the second assessment (Δ=+0.82). Between the second and third assessments negative trends (Δ=−0.10) were found for questions 1, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 10, still positives trends (Δ=+0.65) were found considering all questions from the first to the third assessment.

These results show that in the long term the children's level of knowledge remained very satisfactory compared to what they had before the session and seem to show that the learning and practicing organization of the session was adequate.

This maintenance of knowledge over time corroborates the results of other studies with similar objectives.3,5,6 However, the evidence that the retention of knowledge decreases over time,3 demonstrates the need for regular updating of knowledge, the periodicity for its realization being a matter of debate, to which future studies may respond. Girls and those in more advanced years achieved significant better results.

One point that differentiates this study from the others is the fact that the training session was carried out by doctors as trainers, thus avoiding a confounding human factor.

In conclusion, the theoretical–practical action on BLS carried out by the same trainers improved the results of a questionnaire specifically developed and validated when comparing the results of its application prior to the course and in two other applications, seven days and 180 days after the course.

Ethical considerations

The study received a positive opinion from the Ethics Committee of the Regional Health Administration of the Centre (Projeto 94/2022, October 2022). The positive opinion of the schools that received the initiative was obtained. The children participated in this study voluntarily and each child was informed that they could leave at any time, without constraint for them. Before the start of the study, parents gave their written consent.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References
[1]
A. Kovács, H. Bánfai-Csonka, J. Betlehem, L.A. Ferkai, K. Deutsch, J. Musch, et al.
Teaching cards as low-cost and brief materials for teaching basic life support to 6–10-year-old primary school children – a quasi-experimental combination design study.
BMC Pediatr, 22 (2022), pp. 648
[2]
D.C. Schroeder, F. Semeraro, R. Greif, J. Bray, P. Morley, M. Parr, et al.
KIDS SAVE LIVES: basic life support education for schoolchildren: a narrative review and scientific statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation [published correction appears in Circulation. 2023;148(1):e1. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001166].
Circulation, 147 (2023), pp. 1854-1868
[3]
M.L.R.B.P. Monteiro, A.I.B. Ferraz, F.M.P. Rodrigues.
Assessment of knowledge and self efficacy before and after teaching basic life support to schoolchildren.
Rev Paul Pediatr, 39 (2021), pp. e2019143
[4]
R. Greif, A. Lockey, J. Breckwoldt, F. Carmona, P. Conaghan, A. Kuzovlev, et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: education of resuscitation.
Resuscitation, 161 (2021), pp. 388-407
[5]
A.C.C. Tony, F.D.C. Carbogim, D.S. Motta, K.B.D. Santos, A.A. Dias, A.D.C.P.C. Paiva.
Teaching basic life support to schoolchildren: quasi-experimental study.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 28 (2020), pp. e3340
[6]
J.J. García Del Águila, E. López Rebollo, R. Escamilla Pérez, M. Luque Gutiérrez, P. Fernández del Valle, M. García Sánchez, et al.
Teachers’ training of schoolchildren in basic life support.
Emergencias, 31 (2019), pp. 185-188

All authors have approved the final version to be published.

These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.

Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos