covid
Buscar en
Avances en Diabetología
Toda la web
Inicio Avances en Diabetología Insulina aspart en terapia con perfusión subcutánea continua de insulina
Información de la revista
Vol. 28. Núm. S1.
Actualización sobre el uso de insulina aspart en pacientes con diabetes: ventajas adicionales en diferentes contextos clínicos
Páginas 10-14 (junio 2012)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 28. Núm. S1.
Actualización sobre el uso de insulina aspart en pacientes con diabetes: ventajas adicionales en diferentes contextos clínicos
Páginas 10-14 (junio 2012)
Actualización Sobre El Uso De Insulina Aspart en Pacientes Con Diabetes: Ventajas Adicionales En Diferentes Contextos Clínicos
Acceso a texto completo
Insulina aspart en terapia con perfusión subcutánea continua de insulina
Insulin aspart for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
Visitas
3908
Raquel Barrio Castellanos
Autor para correspondencia
rbarrio.hrc@salud.madrid.org

Autor para correspondencia.
, María Martín Frías
Unidad de Diabetes Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen

Los análogos de insulina de absorción rápida (AIAR) son los que mejor remedan la respuesta fisiológica de la insulina y son los de elección en el tratamiento con ISCI. Hay 3 tipos de AIAR (lispro, aspart y glulisina) con similares propiedades farmacocinéticas, perfiles farmacodinámicos y efectos sobre el control de la glucemia. Sólo se han observado diferencias sutiles entre ellos. La precipitación, fibrilización y oclusión del catéter determinan la compatibilidad para su uso en ISCI. Las oclusiones en las primeras 72h son poco frecuentes e independientes del tipo de AIAR. Después de las 72h, el riesgo de oclusión difiere entre los distintos AIAR, siendo mayor con la insulina glulisina. Se ha demostrado que la insulina aspart tiene resistencia a la precipitación isoeléctrica con baja frecuencia de fibrilización y oclusión en las bombas de insulina en comparación con las insulinas lispro y glulisina. Estas características la hacen buena candidata para su uso en ISCI.

Palabras clave:
Insulina aspart
Insulina lispro
Insulina glulisina
Oclusión del catéter
Viabilidad
Farmacocinética de la insulina
Farmacodinamia de la insulina
Tratamiento con bomba de insulina
Abstract

Rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIA) closely mimic the physiological insulin response to meals and are the drugs of choice in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The three analogues – insulin lispro (lispro), insulin aspart (aspart) and insulin glulisine (glulisine) – show substantial similarities in terms of absorption and clinical efficacy as evaluated by glycemic control, and only subtle differences have been reported. Compatibility for CSII pump use is determined by precipitation, fibrillation, and occlusion. During CSII, early catheter occlusions (within 72 hours) are rare and are independent of the insulin analogue used. After 72 hours, the risk of occlusion differs among insulin analogues, occlusions being more common with glulisine. Insulin aspart has been shown to have greater resistance to isoelectric precipitation and low rates of fibrillation and occlusion in insulin pump compared with lispro or glulisine. These qualities make aspart insulin a good candidate for use in CSII therapy.

Keywords:
Insulin aspart
Insulin lispro
Insulin glulisine
Catheter occlusion
Bioavailability
Insulin pharmacodynamics
Insulin pharmacokinetics
Insulin pump therapy
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
The Diabetes CONTROL AND Complications Trial Research, Group.
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
N Engl J Med, 329 (1993), pp. 977-986
[2.]
DCCT/EDIC Study Group.
The effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
JAMA, 287 (2002), pp. 2563-2569
[3.]
I.B. Hirsch.
Insulin analogues.
N Engl J Med, 352 (2005), pp. 174-183
[4.]
J.H. Anderson Jr., R.L. Brunelle, V.A. Koivisto, A. Pfutzner, M.E. Trautmann, L. Vignati, et al.
Reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and frequency of hypoglycaemia in IDDM patients on insulin-analog treatment. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group.
Diabetes, 46 (1997), pp. 265-270
[5.]
P.D. Home, A. Lindholm, A. Riis, European Insulin Aspart Study Group.
Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.
Diabet Med, 17 (2000), pp. 762-770
[6.]
S.R. Heller, S. Colagiuri, S. Vaaler, B.H. Wolffenbuttel, K. Koelendorf, H.H. Friberg, et al.
Hypoglycaemia with insulin aspart: a double-blind, randomised, crossover trial in subjects with Type 1 diabetes.
Diabet Med, 21 (2004), pp. 769-775
[7.]
K. Rave, O. Klein, A.D. Frick, R.H. Becker.
Advantage of premeal-injected insulin glulisine compared with regular human insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care, 29 (2006), pp. 1812-1817
[8.]
C. Homko, A. Deluzio, C. Jiménez, J.W. Kolaczynski, G. Boden.
Comparison of insulin aspart and lispro: pharmacokinetic and metabolic effects.
Diabetes Care, 26 (2003), pp. 2027-2031
[9.]
C.A. Hedman, T. Lindstrom, H.J. Arnqvist.
Direct comparison of insulin lispro and aspart shows small differences in plasma insulin profiles after subcutaneous injection in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care, 24 (2001), pp. 1120-1121
[10.]
C. Poulsen, L. Langkjaer, C. Worsoe.
Precipitation of insulin products used for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 7 (2005), pp. 142-150
[11.]
Apidra [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis, US LLC; 2009.
[12.]
B. Zinman, H. Tildesley, J.L. Chiassonn, E. Tsui, T. Strack.
Insulin lispro in CSII: results of a double-blind crossover study.
Diabetes, 46 (1997), pp. 440-443
[13.]
I.B. Hirsch, B.W. Bode, S. Garg, W.S. Lane, A. Sussman, P. Hu, Insulin Aspart CSII/MDI Comparison Study Group, et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) of insulin aspart versus multiple daily injection of insulin aspart/insulin glargine in type 1 diabetic patients previously treated with CSII.
Diabetes Care, 28 (2005), pp. 533-538
[14.]
P. Hildebrandt, K. Birch, B.M. Jensen, C. Kúhl.
Subcutaneous insulin infusion: change in basal infusion rate has no immediate effect on insulin absorption rate.
Diabetes Care, 9 (1986), pp. 561-564
[15.]
S.B. Petersen, J. Kildegaard, F.S. Nielsen, E. Sondergaard, T. Parkner, T. Laureen, et al.
Pharmacokinetics following continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion of insulin aspart with or without initial subcutaneous bolus.
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 12 (2010), pp. 334-340
[16.]
B.W. Bode.
Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties, physicochemical stability, and pump compatibility of a rapid-acting insulin analogues- aspart, lispro and glulisine.
Endocrine Practice, 17 (2011), pp. 271-280
[17.]
E. Cobry, K. McFann, L. Messer, V. Gage, B. VanderWel, L. Horton, et al.
Timing of meal insulin boluses to achieve optimal postpradial glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 12 (2010), pp. 173-177
[18.]
R.P. Hoogma, D. Schumicki.
Safety of insulin glulisine when given by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using and external pump in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Horm Metab Res, 38 (2006), pp. 429-433
[19.]
M. Dreyer, R. Prager, A. Robinson, K. Busch, G. Ellis, E. Souhami, et al.
Efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Horm Metab Res, 37 (2005), pp. 702-707
[20.]
P.D. Bartolo, F. Pellicano, A. Scaramuzza, C. Sardu, T. Casetti, E. Bosi, et al.
Better postprandial glucose stability during continuous subcutaneous infusion with insulin aspart compared with insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 10 (2008), pp. 495-498
[21.]
S.A. Weinzimer, C. Ternand, C. Howard, C.T. Chang, D.J. Becker, L.M. Laffel.
Insulin Aspart Pediatric Pump Study Group. A randomized trial comparing continuous subcutaneous insulina infusion of insulin aspart versus insulin lispro in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care, 31 (2008), pp. 210-215
[22.]
J. Plank, A. Wutte, G. Brunner, A. Siebenhofer, B. Semlitsch, R. Sommer, et al.
A direct comparison of insulin aspart and insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care, 25 (2002), pp. 2053-2057
[23.]
B. Bode, R. Weinstein, D. Bell, J. McGill, D. Nadeau, P. Raskin, et al.
Comparison of insulin aspart with buffered regular insulin and insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized study inn type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care, 25 (2002), pp. 439-444
[24.]
T. Heise, L. Nosek, H. Spitzer, L. Heinemann, E. Niemöller, A.D. Frick, et al.
Insulin glulisine: a faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro.
Diabetes Obes Metab, 9 (2007), pp. 746-753
[25.]
J. Brange, L. Andersen, E.D. Laureen, G. Meyn, E. Rasmussen.
Toward understanding insulin fibrillation.
J Pharm Sci, 86 (1997), pp. 517-525
[26.]
C. Poulsen, L. Langkjaer, C. Worsoe.
Precipitation of insulin aspart and insulin glulisine products used for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 9 (2007), pp. 75-79
[27.]
J. Senstius, E. Harboe, H. Westermann.
In vitro stability of insulin aspart in simulated continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using a Minimed 508 insulin pump.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 9 (2007), pp. 75-79
[28.]
J. Senstius, C. Poulsen, A. Hvass.
Comparison of in vitro stability of insulin aspart and glulisine during simulated use in insulin pumps.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 9 (2007), pp. 517-521
[29.]
M.R. DeFilippis, M.A. Bell, J.A. Heyod, S.M. Storms.
In vitro stability of insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 8 (2006), pp. 358-368
[30.]
Humalog [prescribing information]. Indianápolis, IN: Eli Llilly & Company; 2009.
[31.]
Apidra [prescribing information]. NJ: Sanofi-Aventis. US LLC; 2009.
[32.]
NovoLog [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Novo Nordisk A/S; 2010.
[33.]
H.A. Wolpert, R.N. Faradji, S. Bonner-Weir, M.A. Lipes.
Metabolic decompensation in pump users due to lispro insulin precipitation.
BMJ, 324 (2002), pp. 1253
[34.]
D. Kerr, J. Morton, C. Whately-Smith, J. Everett, J.P. Begley.
Laboratory-based non-clinical comparison of occlusion rates using three rapid-acting insulin analogs in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion catheters using low flow rates.
J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2 (2008), pp. 450-455
[35.]
A.C. Van Bon, B.W. Bode, C. Sert-Langeron, J.H. DeVries, G. Charpentier.
Insulin glulisine compared to insulin aspart and to insulin lispro administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 13 (2011), pp. 607-614
[36.]
L. Jovanovic.
Letter written in response to van Bon et al: “Insulin glulisine compared to insulin aspart and to insulin lispro administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial”.
Diabetes Technol Ther, 13 (2011), pp. 869-870
Copyright © 2012. Sociedad Española de Diabetes
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos