metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Surgical smoke: risks and preventive measures
Información de la revista
Vol. 85. Núm. 5.
Páginas 274-279 (mayo 2009)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 85. Núm. 5.
Páginas 274-279 (mayo 2009)
Special article
Acceso a texto completo
Surgical smoke: risks and preventive measures
El humo quirúrgico: riesgos y medidas preventivas
Visitas
2077
Hilario Carbajo-Rodrígueza,
Autor para correspondencia
hilariocarbajo@hotmail.com

Author for correspondence.
, José Luis Aguayo-Albasinib, Víctor Soria-Aledob, Concepción García-Lópeza
a Servicio de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
b Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Abstract

The application of the advanced technologies in medicine has led to the appearance of new risk factors for health personnel. One of these could be the surgical smoke produced by electrosurgical instruments, ultrasounds, or laser. However, there is still insufficient evidence in the published population studies on the detrimental effects of chronic exposure to surgical smoke. The main concern on the possible damage to the health of operating room staff is mainly based on the components currently detected until the date and laboratory experiments. Caution must also be used when extrapolating the results of in vitro studies to daily clinical practice.

The organisations responsible for protecting the health of the workers in different countries have still not issued guidelines for the treatment and removal of the surgical smoke generated in both open and laparoscopic procedures. In this article we try to present a view of the consequences that surgical smoke has on health and the preventive measures that can be adopted.

Keywords:
Operating room
Surgical smoke
Adverse events
Occupational healtht
Resumen

La aplicacion de las tecnologias avanzadas a la medicina ha supuesto el incremento de algunos factores de riesgo en el personal sanitario. Uno de ellos podria ser el humo quirurgico producido por instrumentos electroquirurgicos, ultrasonidos o laser. La voz de alarma acerca de un posible perjuicio para la salud de los trabajadores de quirofano se basa fundamentalmente en los componentes detectados hasta la fecha y los experimentos realizados en el laboratorio. No obstante, hay que tener precaucion al extrapolar los resultados de los estudios in vitro a la practica clinica diaria y, hasta la fecha, no hay evidencias suficientes del efecto perjudicial de la exposicion cronica a este en los estudios poblacionales publicados.

Los organismos responsables de velar por la salud de los trabajadores en distintos paises no han emitido todavia normas para el tratamiento y la evacuacion del humo quirurgico generado en intervenciones tanto por laparotomia como por laparoscopia. En este articulo pretendemos ofrecer una vision de las consecuencias que el humo quirurgico tiene para la salud y las medidas preventivas que se pueden adoptar.

Palabras clave:
Quirofano
Humo quirurgico
Efectos nocivos
Salud laboral
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
J. Spearman, G. Tsavellas, P. Nichols.
Current attitudes and practices towards diathermy smoke.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl., 89 (2007), pp. 162-165
[2.]
K.J. Weld, S. Dryer, C.D. Ames, K. Cho, C. Hogan, M. Lee, et al.
Analysis of surgical smoke produced by various energy-based instruments and effect on laparoscopic visibility.
J Endourol., 21 (2007), pp. 347-351
[3.]
L. Bigony.
Risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke plume: a review of the literature.
AORN J., 86 (2007), pp. 1013-1020
[4.]
M.A. Gates, D. Feskanich, F.E. Speizer, S.E. Hankinsen.
Operating room nursing and lung cancer risk in a cohort of female registered nurses.
Scand J Work Environ Health., 33 (2007), pp. 140-147
[5.]
D.B. Ott.
Laparoscopic surgical smoke absorbed into bloodstream.
O R Manager., 10 (1994), pp. 19
[6.]
J.G. Descoteaux, P. Picard, E.C. Poulin, M. Baril.
Preliminary study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic procedures.
Surg Endosc., 10 (1996), pp. 152-158
[7.]
D.L. Jewett, P. Heinsohn, C. Bennett, A. Rosen, C. Neuilly.
Bloodcontaining aerosols generated by surgical techniques: a possible infectious hazard.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J., 53 (1992), pp. 228-231
[8.]
C. Nezhat, W.K. Winer, F. Nezhat, D. Forrest, W.G. Reeves.
Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard?.
Surg Med., 7 (1987), pp. 376-382
[9.]
B.L. Ziegler, C.A. Thomas, T. Meier, R. Müller, T.M. Fliedner, L. Weber.
Generation of infectious retrovirus aerosol through medical laser irradiation.
Lasers Surg Med., 22 (1998), pp. 37-41
[10.]
E. Cavina, O. Goletti, N. Molea, P. Buccianti, M. Chiarugi, G. Boni, et al.
Trocar site tumor recurences. May pneumoperitoneum be responsible?.
Surg Endosc., 12 (1998), pp. 1294-1296
[11.]
L.N. Tseng, F.J. Berends, P. Wittich, N.D. Bouvy, R.L. Marquet, G. Kazemier, et al.
Port-site metastases Impact of local tissue trauma and gas leakage.
Surg Endosc., 12 (1998), pp. 1377-1380
[12.]
K. Ball.
Surgical smoke: is it safety to breathe?.
Todays Surg Nurs., 18 (1996), pp. 16-21
[13.]
B. Ulmer.
Patient safety during electrosurgical minimally invasive procedures.
Minim Invasive Surg Nurs., 10 (1996), pp. 2-4
[14.]
M. Hoglan.
Potencial hazards from electrosurgery plume: recommendations for surgical smoke evacuation.
Canadian Operating Room Nurs J., 13 (1995), pp. 10-16
[15.]
O.S. Al Sahaf, I. Vega-Carrascal, F.O. Cunningham, J.P. McGrath, F.J. Bloomfied.
Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery.
Ir J Med Sci., 176 (2007), pp. 229-232
[16.]
G. Champault, N. Taffinder, M. Ziol, H. Riskalla, J.M. Catheline.
Cells are present in the smoke created during laparoscopic surgery.
Br J Surg., 84 (1997), pp. 993-995
[17.]
J.N. Fletcher, D. Mew, J.G. DesCôteaux.
Dissemination of melanoma cells within electrocautery plume.
Am J Surg., 178 (1999), pp. 57-59
[18.]
C.C. Nduka, N. Poland, M. Kennedy, J. Dye, A. Darzi.
Does the ultrasonically activated scalped release viable airborne cancer cells?.
Surg Endosc., 12 (1998), pp. 1031-1034
[19.]
J.W. Osterhuis, R.C. Verschueren, R. Eibergen, J. Oldhoff.
The viability of cells in the waste products of CO2-laser evaporation of Cloudman mouse melanomas.
Cancer., 49 (1982), pp. 61-67
[20.]
H.J. Bonjer, C.N. Gutt, G. Hubens, L. Krähenbühl, S.H. Kim, N.D. Bouvy, et al.
Port site metastases in laparoscopic surgery. First workshop on experimental laparoscopic surgery, Frankfurt 1997.
Surg Endosc., 12 (1998), pp. 1102-1103
[21.]
S.W. Lee, N.R. Gleason, M. Bessler, R.L. Whelan.
Tumor proliferative index is higher in mice undergoing laparotomy vs CO2 pneumoperitoneum.
Dis Colon Rectum., 42 (1999), pp. 477-481
[22.]
J. Martinez, E.M. Targarona, C. Balague, M. Pera, M. Trias.
Port site metastasis. An unresolved problem in laparoscopic surgery. A review.
Int Surg., 80 (1995), pp. 315-321
[23.]
R.S. Savalgi.
Port-site metastasis in the abdominal wall: fact or fiction?.
Semin Surg Oncol., 15 (1998), pp. 189-193
[24.]
M.L. Texler, G. King, P.J. Hewett.
From inside out Microperforation of the gallbladder during laparoscopic surgery may liberate mucosal cells.
Surg Endosc., 12 (1998), pp. 1297-1299
[25.]
P.H. Wang, C.C. Yuan, G. Lin, H.T. Ng, H.T. Chao.
Risk factors contributing to early occurrence of port site metastases of laparoscopic surgery for malignancy.
Gynecol Oncol., 72 (1999), pp. 38-44
[26.]
M.S. Baggish, B.J. Poiesz, D. Joret, P. Williamson, A. Refai.
Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke.
Lasers Surg Med., 11 (1991), pp. 197-203
[27.]
J.M. Garden, M.K. O’Banion, L.S. Shelnitz, K.S. Pinski, A.D. Bakus, M.E. Reichmann, et al.
Papillomavirus in the vapour of carbon dioxide laser-treated verrucae.
JAMA., 259 (1988), pp. 1199-1202
[28.]
H. Gloster, R. Roenigk.
Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts.
J Am Acad Dermatol., 32 (1995), pp. 436-441
[29.]
P. Hallmo, O. Naess.
Laryngeal papilomatosis with human papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon.
Eur Arch Otohinolaryngol., 248 (1991), pp. 425-427
[30.]
Calidad ambiental en hospitales: quirófanos y áreas críticas. Puntexpress. Revista de la consulta n.o 565 de 20-3-2003.
[31.]
RD414/96 por el que se regula los productos sanitarios(BOE de 24 de abril de1996).
[32.]
J.S. Garner.
The CDC Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisor y Comitee.
AmJ InfectControl., 21 (1993), pp. 160-162
[33.]
Dispositivos de protección respiratoria. UNE-EN149;2001.
[34.]
N.F. Phillips.
Técnicas de quirófano de Berry y Kohn.
10th ed, Elsevier, (2004),
Copyright © 2009. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos