Información de la revista
Vol. 40. Núm. 2.
Páginas 91-94 (mayo - julio 2012)
Vol. 40. Núm. 2.
Páginas 91-94 (mayo - julio 2012)
Acceso a texto completo
Random Error, Bias and Fraud in Scientific Publications
Error aleatorio, sesgo y fraude en las publicaciones científicas
Visitas
3451
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
D.R. Miller.
Towards enhanced transparency and accuracy of scientific reporting in biomedical journals.
Rev Colomb Anestesiol, 40 (2012), pp. 1-3
[2.]
M. Franzen, S. Rodder, P. Weingart.
Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct.
EMBO Rep, 8 (2007), pp. 3-7
[3.]
R.G. Steen.
Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play?.
J Med Ethics, 37 (2011), pp. 498-503
[4.]
R.G. Steen.
Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?.
J Med Ethics, 37 (2011), pp. 688-692
[5.]
R.G. Steen.
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?.
J Med Ethics, 37 (2011), pp. 113-117
[7.]
K. Rothman, S. Greenland.
Modern epidemiology, 2nd edition ed, pp. 79-91
[8.]
D.E. Buzzelli.
The Definition of Misconduct in Science: A View from NSF.
Science, 259 (1993), pp. 584-648
[9.]
J.A. Aldrete.
Plagio y otros traspasos literario-cientÌficos en medicina y particularmente en anestesiologÌa.
Rev Colomb Anestesiol, 39 (2011), pp. 217-229
[10.]
D.C. González Sandoval.
Plagio: Una problemática de la mente humana.
Rev Colomb Anestesiol, 39 (2011), pp. 271
[11.]
M.N. Rojas Chavarro, J.M. Olarte Collazos.
Plagio en el ámbito académico.
Rev Colomb Anestesiol, 38 (2010), pp. 537-538
[12.]
M. Nylenna, D. Andersen, G. Dahlquist, M. Sarvas, A. Aakvaag.
Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries.
Lancet, 354 (1999), pp. 57-61
[13.]
J.B. Carlisle.
The analysis of 169 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
Anaesthesia., (2012),
[14.]
Marcus A. German Medical Board Issues Sweeping Findings in Boldt Case. Ninety studies implicated in probe, might require retraction. Anesthesiology News, The independent monthly newspaper for anesthesiologists. 2011; February 14. Available in http://m.anesthesiologynews.com/Article.aspx?d=Web+Exclusives&d_id=175&i=February+2011&i_id=702&a_id=16596. Accesed on March, 2012
[15.]
COPE - The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Promoting integrity in research publication. COPE; 2012 [cited 2012 March 15th]; Available at: http://publicationethics.org/.
[16.]
K.M. Korpela.
How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited.
Curr Med Res Opin, 26 (2010), pp. 843-847
Copyright © 2012. Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación