covid
Buscar en
Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa CEDE
Toda la web
Inicio Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa CEDE Concentraciones territoriales, alianzas estratégicas e innovación. Un enfoque ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 10. Núm. 30.
Páginas 5-37 (enero 2007)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 10. Núm. 30.
Páginas 5-37 (enero 2007)
Open Access
Concentraciones territoriales, alianzas estratégicas e innovación. Un enfoque de capacidades dinámicas
Visitas
3117
C. Quintana garcía
, C.A. Benavides Velasco**
* Dpto. Economía y Administración de Empresas. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Campus El Ejido, s/n. 29071 Málaga (España). Teléfono: (34) 95 213 41 47 Fax: (34) 95 213 12 93
** Dpto. Economía y Administración de Empresas. E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales. Campus El Ejido, s/n. 29071 Málaga (España). Teléfono: (34) 95 213 28 76 Fax: (34) 95 213 70 33
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen

Este trabajo persigue identificar y medir la incidencia conjunta de las concentraciones geográficas y las redes de cooperación en la capacidad de las empresas de alta tecnología para completar los recursos y competencias esenciales en sus procesos de innovación. Para ello, se ha formulado y contrastado un conjunto de hipótesis mediante el estudio de una muestra de empresas biotecnológicas. Como resultado, se obtienen conclusiones interesantes sobre el efecto de la localización y las alianzas en el acceso de estas empresas a recursos y competencias clave tales como conocimiento científico y tecnológico, personal altamente cualificado, competencias complementarias de producción y comercialización, apropiabilidad y recursos financieros externos; asimismo se examina la relación existente entre estos factores y el rendimiento innovador.

Palabras clave:
Distritos tecnológicos
redes de cooperación
externalidades de conocimiento
apropiabilidad
empresas dedicadas a la biotecnología (EDB).
Abstract

This paper aims to measure the joint influence of geographic concentration and strategic alliances on the capacity of high-technology firms to complete key resources and competences for their innovation processes. A set of hypotheses are contrasted through a study carried out within a sample of biofirms. As a result, interesting conclusions about the effect of location and alliances on accessing key resources and competences such as scientific and technological knowledge, skilled labour, complementary downstream competences, appropriability and external financial resources; likewise, the relationship between these factors and innovation performance is examined.

Key words:
Technological clusters
cooperation network
spillovers
appropriability
dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs)
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias bibliógraficas
[Acs et al., 1992]
Z.J. Acs, D.B. Audretsch, M.P. Feldman.
Real effects of academic research: comment.
The American Economic Review, vol. 82 (1992), pp. 363-367
[Acs, 2002]
Z.J. Acs.
Innovation and the Growth of Cities.
Edward Elgar, (2002),
[Afuah, 2000]
A. Afuah.
How much do your ‘co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change?.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21 (2000), pp. 387-404
[Almeida and Kogut, 1999]
P. Almeida, B. Kogut.
Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks.
Management Science, vol. 45 (1999), pp. 905-917
[Amit and Schoemaker, 1993]
R. Amit, P. Schoemaker.
Strategic assets and organizational rent.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14 (1993), pp. 33-46
[Anselin et al., 2000]
L. Anselin, A. Varga, Z.J. Acs.
Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities.
Papers in Regional Science, vol. 79 (2000), pp. 435-443
[Antonelli, 2000]
C. Antonelli.
Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts.
Regional Studies, vol. 34 (2000), pp. 535-547
[Asebio, 2002]
Asebio (2002), Informe Asebio 2002, Asociación Española de Bioempresas, Madrid.
[Audretsch, 2001]
D.B. Audretsch.
The Role of Small Firms in U.S. Biotechnology Clusters.
Small Business Economics, vol. 17 (2001), pp. 3-15
[Audretsch and Feldman, 1996]
D.B. Audretsch, M.P. Feldman.
R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.
The American Economic Review, vol. 86 (1996), pp. 630-640
[Audretsch and Feldman, 2003]
D.B. Audretsch, M.P. Feldman.
Small-firm strategic research partnership: The case of biotechnology.
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 15 (2003), pp. 273-288
[Audretsch and Stephan, 1996]
D.B. Audretsch, P.E. Stephan.
Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology.
The American Economic Review, vol. 86 (1996), pp. 641-652
[Baptista, 2001]
R. Baptista.
Geographical Clusters and Innovation Diffusion.
Technological Forescasting and Social Change, vol. 66 (2001), pp. 31-46
[Barney, 1991]
J.B. Barney.
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.
Journal of Management, vol. 17 (1991), pp. 99-120
[Bartholomew, 1997]
S. Bartholomew.
National systems of biotechnology innovation: complex interdependence in the global system.
Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 28 (1997), pp. 241-266
[Benjamin and Podolny, 1999]
B.B. Benjamin, J.M. Podolny.
Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry.
Administrative Science Quarterly, vol 44 (1999), pp. 563-589
[Best, 1999]
M.H. Best.
Regional growth dynamics: a capabilities perspective.
Contributions to Political Economy, vol. 18 (1999), pp. 105-119
[Cabo, 1999]
P.G. Cabo.
Industrial participation and knowledge transfer in joint R&D projects.
International Journal of Technology Management, vol 18 (1999), pp. 188-206
[Camagni, 1991]
Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives,,
[Capello and Faggian, 2005]
R. Capello, A. Faggian.
Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation Processes.
Regional Studies, vol. 39 (2005), pp. 75-87
[Carrincazeaux et al., 2001]
C. Carrincazeaux, Y. Lung, A. Rallet.
Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities.
Research Policy, vol. 30 (2001), pp. 777-789
[Casper and Kettler, 2001]
S. Casper, H. Kettler.
National Institutional Frameworks and the Hybridization of Entrepreneurial Business Models: The German and UK Biotechnology Sectors.
Industry and Innovation, vol. 8 (2001), pp. 5-30
[CDTI, 2002]
CDTI (2002), Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial [http://www.cdti.es].[Consulta: noviembre 2002].
[CICYT, 1997]
CICYT (1998), Spanish research groups & enterprises working in biotechnology 1997. Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología. [http://www.cicyt.es]. [Consulta: octubre 2002].
[Cohen and Levinthal, 1990]
W.M. Cohen, D.A. Levinthal.
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.
Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35 (1990), pp. 128-152
[Coombs and Deeds, 2000]
J.E. Coombs, D.L. Deeds.
International alliances as sources of capital: evidence from biotechnology industry.
The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 11 (2000), pp. 235-253
[Coombs and Metcalfe, 2000]
R. Coombs, J.S. Metcalfe.
Organizing for Innovation: Co-ordinating Distributed Innovation Capabilities.
Competence, Governance & Entrepreneurship, pp. 209-234
[Danneels, 2002]
E. Danneels.
The dynamic of product innovation and firm competences.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23 (2002), pp. 1095-1121
[DeCarolis and Deeds, 1999]
D. DeCarolis, D. Deeds.
The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20 (1999), pp. 953-968
[Deeds and Hill, 1996]
D. Deeds, W.L. Hill.
Strategic alliances, complementary assets and new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms.
Journal of Business Venturing, vol 12 (1996), pp. 31-46
[Deeds et al., 1999]
D. Deeds, D. DECarolis, J. Coombs.
Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: an empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms.
Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15 (1999), pp. 211-229
[Dierickx and Cool, 1989]
I. Dierickx, K. Cool.
Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage.
Management Science, vol. 35 (1989), pp. 1504-1513
[Dosi, 1988]
G. Dosi.
The nature of the innovate process.
Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 221-238
[Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000]
K.M. Eisenhardt, J.A. Martin.
Dynamic capabilities: what are they?.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21 (2000), pp. 1105-1121
[Enright, 1995]
M. Enright.
Organization and coordination in geographically concentrated industries.
Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, pp. 1-17
[Enright, 1998]
M. Enright.
Regional Clusters and Firm Strategy.
The Dynamic Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions,, pp. 315-342
[Feldman, 1994]
M.P. Feldman.
The geography of Innovation.
MIT Press, (1994),
[Feldman and Florida, 1994]
M.P. Feldman, R. Florida.
The Geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States.
Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 84 (1994), pp. 210-229
[Florida, 2000]
R. Florida.
The Learning Region.
Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change,, pp. 231-244
[Folta, 1998]
T. Folta.
Governance and uncertainty: the trade-off between administrative control and commitment.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19 (1998), pp. 1007-1028
[Foss, 1999]
N.J. Foss.
Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage.
Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol 15 (1999), pp. 1-15
[Genoma España, 2002]
Genoma España (2002), Empresas españolas dedicadas a la biotecnología, Genoma España, [http://www.gen-es.org]. [Consulta: Noviembre 2002].
[Goddard, 1978]
J. Goddard.
The Location of Non-manufacturing Activities Within Manufacturing Industries.
Contemporary Industrialization, pp. 62-85
[Grant, 1991]
R.M. Grant.
The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation.
California Management Review, vol. 33 (1991), pp. 114-135
[Grant, 1996]
R.M. Grant.
Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17 (1996), pp. 109-122
[Greene, 1998]
W.H. Greene.
Econometric Analysis.
Prentice-Hall, (1998),
[Gulati and Singh, 1998]
R. Gulati, H. Singh.
The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances.
Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 43 (1998), pp. 781-814
[Hair et al., 1999]
J. Hair, R. Anderson, R. Tatham, W. Black.
Análisis Multivariante.
Prentice-Hall, (1999),
[Harabi, 1995]
N. Harabi.
Appropriability of technical innovations.
An empirical analysis», Research Policy, vol. 24 (1995), pp. 981-992
[Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000]
C.E. Helfat, R.S. Raubitschek.
Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 21 (2000), pp. 961-979
[Henderson, 1986]
J.V. Henderson.
Efficiency of Resource Usage and City Size.
Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 19 (1986), pp. 47-70
[Henderson and Cockburn, 2002]
R. Henderson, I. Cockburn.
Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Drug Discovery.
The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities, pp. 155-182
[Howells, 1984]
J. Howells.
The Location of Research and Development: Some Observations and Evidence from Britain.
Regional Studies, vol. 18 (1984), pp. 13-29
[Howells, 2002]
J. Howells.
Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography.
Urban Studies, vol. 30 (2002), pp. 871-884
[Isard, 1956]
W. Isard.
Location and Space-Economy.
MIT Press, (1956),
[ISI, 2002]
ISI (2002), ISI Web of Science, ISI Web of Knowledge [http://www.isi4.newisiknowledge. com].[Consulta: junio 2003].
[Jaffe, 1989]
A.B. Jaffe.
Real effects of academic research.
The American Economic Review, vol. 79 (1989), pp. 957-970
[Jaffe et al., 1993]
A.B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson.
Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108 (1993), pp. 577-598
[Keeble, 2000]
D. Keeble.
Collective Learning Processes in European High-Technology Milieux.
High-technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, pp. 199-229
[Kogut and Zander, 1992]
I. Kogut, U. Zander.
Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology.
Organization Science, vol 3 (1992), pp. 383-397
[Lado et al., 1997]
A.A. Lado, N.G. Boyd, S.C. Hanlon.
Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model.
Academy of Management Review, vol. 22 (1997), pp. 110-141
[Lawson, 1999]
C. Lawson.
Towards a competence theory of the region.
Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 23 (1999), pp. 151-166
[Lawson and Samson, 2001]
B. Lawson, D. Samson.
Developing innovation capability in organizations: a dynamic capabilities approach.
International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 5 (2001), pp. 377-400
[Lemarié et al., 2001]
A. Lemarié, V. Mangematin, A. Torre.
Is the Creation and Development of Biotech SMEs Localised? Conclusions Drawn from the French Case.
Small Business Economics, vol. 17 (2001), pp. 61-76
[Lerner and Merges, 1998]
J. Lerner, R.P. Merges.
The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry.
Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 46 (1998), pp. 125-156
[Levin et al., 1987]
R.C. Levin, A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson, S.G. Winter.
Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development.
Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 3 (1987), pp. 783-820
[Liebeskind et al., 1996]
J.P. Liebeskind, A.L. Oliver, L. Zucker, M. Brewer.
Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms.
Organization Science, vol 7 (1996), pp. 428-443
[Lindholm, 2000]
Å. Lindholm.
Large Firm Acquisitions Spin-Offs and Links in the Development of Regional Clusters of Technology-Intensive SMEs.
High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, pp. 156-181
[Lippman and Rumelt, 1982]
S.A. Lippman, R.P. Rumelt.
Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition.
The Bell Journal of Economics, (1982), pp. 418-438
[Lösch, 1954]
A. Lösch.
The Economics of Location.
Yale University Press, (1954),
[Madhok and Osegowitsch, 2000]
A. Madhok, T. Osegowitsch.
The International Biotechnology Industry: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective.
Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 31 (2000), pp. 325-335
[Madri+, 2002]
Madri+D (2002), Sistema Regional de Información y Promoción Tecnológica Madri+d. [http://www.madrimasd.org]. [Consulta: noviembre 2002].
[Magrini, 1998]
S. Magrini.
The Evolution of Income Disparities among Regions of the European Union.
Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 29 (1998), pp. 257-281
[Malecki, 1980]
E.J. Malecki.
Dimensions of R&D Location in the United States.
Research Policy, vol. 9 (1980), pp. 2-22
[Marshall, 1920]
A. Marshall.
Principles of Economics, MacMillan.
Londres, (1920),
[Martin and Rogers, 1994]
P.J. Martin, C.A. Rogers.
Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure.
CEPR Discussion Paper, (1994),
[McEvily and Zaheer, 1999]
B. McEvily, A. Zaheer.
Bringing ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20 (1999), pp. 1133-1156
[McNamara, 1998]
P. McNamara.
Knowledge based strategic alliances and value creation: A study of biotechnology firms quoted on the London Stock Exchange.
Irish Business and Administration Research, vol 19/20 (1998), pp. 99-117
[Metcalf and James, 2000]
J.S. Metcalf, A. James.
Knowledge and capabilities. A new view of the firm.
Resource, Technology and Strategy. Explorations in the resource-based perspective, pp. 31-52
[Nelson, 1991]
R. Nelson.
Why do firms differ and how does it matter.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12 (1991), pp. 61-74
[Nelson and Winter, 1982]
R.R. Nelson, S. Winter.
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Harvard University Press, (1982),
[Niosi, 2002]
J. Niosi.
Alliances are not enough explaining rapid growth in biotechnology firms.
Research Policy, vol. 32 (2002), pp. 737-750
[OECD, 2001]
OECD (2001), «Biotechnology statistics in OECD member countries: compendium of existing national statistics», STI Working Papers, 2001/6.
[OEPM, 2002]
OEPM (2002), Oepmpat. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas. [http://www.oepm.es]. [Consulta: junio 2003].
[Oerlemans et al., 2001]
L. Oerlemans, M. Meeus, F. Boekema.
Firm clustering and innovation: Determinants and effects.
Papers in Regional Science, vol. 80 (2001), pp. 337-356
[Owen-Smith et al., 2002]
J. Owen-Smith, M. Raiccaboni, F. Pammolli, W.W. Powell.
A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences.
Management Science, vol. 48 (2002), pp. 24-43
[Park and Russo, 1996]
S.H. Park, M.V. Russo.
When Competition Eclipses Cooperation: An Event History Analysis of Joint Venture Failure.
Management Science, vol. 42 (1996), pp. 875-890
[Peteraf, 1993]
M. Peteraf.
The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource basedview.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14 (1993), pp. 179-191
[Pisano, 1991]
G. Pisano.
The Governance of Innovation: Vertical Integration and Collaborative Arrangements in the Biotechnology Industry.
Research Policy, vol. 20 (1991), pp. 237-249
[Pisano et al., 1988]
G. Pisano, W. Shan, D. Teece.
Joint Ventures and Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry.
International collaborative ventures in U. S. manufacturing, pp. 183-222
[Porter, 1990]
M.E. Porter.
The Competitive Advantage of the Nations.
Free Press, (1990),
[Porter, 2000]
M.E. Porter.
Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy.
Economic Development Quarterly, vol 14 (2000), pp. 15-34
[Powell et al., 1996]
W.W. Powell, K.K. Koput, L. Smith-doerr.
Interoganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.
Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41 (1996), pp. 116-145
[Prahalad and Hamel, 1990]
C.K. Prahalad, G. Hamel.
The core competence of the corporation.
Harvard Business Review, vol. 68 (1990), pp. 79-91
[Quince and Whittaker, 2002]
Quince, T. y Whittaker, H. (2002), «Close encounters: evidence of the potential benefits of proximity to local industrial clusters», ESRC Working Paper, n° 235.
[Quintana García and Benavides Velasco, 2004]
C. Quintana García, C.A. Benavides Velasco.
Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European biotechnology firms.
Technovation, vol. 24 (2004), pp. 927-938
[Robinson et al., 1991]
J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, L.S. Wrightsman.
Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation.
Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes,
[Rothaermel, 2001]
F.T. Rothaermel.
Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22 (2001), pp. 687-699
[Shan et al., 1994]
W. Shan, G. Walker, B. Kogut.
Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15 (1994), pp. 387-394
[Shan and Song, 1997]
W. Shan, J. Song.
Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: evidence from the biotechnology industry.
Journal of International Business Study, vol. 28 (1997), pp. 267-284
[Sharp, 1999]
M. Sharp.
The science of nations: European multinationals and American biotechnology.
International Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 1 (1999), pp. 132-162
[Sherer and Ross, 1990]
F.M. Sherer, D. Ross.
Industrial Markets Structure and Economic Performance.
Houghton, (1990),
[Sinkula, 1994]
J.M. Sinkula.
Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning.
Journal of Marketing, vol. 58 (1994), pp. 35-45
[Slater and Narver, 1995]
S. Slater, J. Narver.
Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.
Journal of Marketing, vol. 59 (1995), pp. 63-74
[Smith, 1971]
D. Smith.
Industrial Location: An Economic Geographical Analysis.
Wiley, (1971),
[Song et al., 2003]
J. Song, P. Almeida, G. Wu.
Learning-by-Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer.
Management Science, vol. 45 (2003), pp. 905-917
[Stephan et al., 2000]
P. Stephan, D. Audretsch, R. Hawkins.
The knowledge production function: lessons from biotechnology.
International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 19 (2000), pp. 165-178
[Stephan and Everhart, 1998]
P. Stephan, S.A. Everhart.
The Changing Rewards to Science: The Case of Biotechnology.
Small Business Economics, vol. 10 (1998), pp. 141-151
[Storper, 1995]
M. Storper.
The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Year Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies.
European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 2 (1995), pp. 191-221
[Stuart et al., 1999]
T.E. Stuart, H. Hoang, R.C. Hybels.
Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreurial ventures.
Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44 (1999), pp. 315-349
[Stuart and Sorenson, 2003]
T.E. Stuart, O. Sorenson.
The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms.
Research Policy, vol. 32 (2003), pp. 229-254
[Teece, 1986]
D.J. Teece.
Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.
Research Policy, vol 15 (1986), pp. 285-305
[Teece, 1998]
D.J. Teece.
Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets.
California Management Review, vol 40 (1998), pp. 55-78
[Teece et al., 1997]
D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen.
Dynamic caApabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18 (1997), pp. 509-533
[Utterback, 1974]
J. Utterback.
Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology.
Science, vol. 183 (1974), pp. 620-626
[Weber, 1928]
A. Weber.
Theory of the Location of Industries.
Chicago University Press, (1928),
[Wernerfelt, 1984]
B. Wernerfelt.
A resource-based view of the firm.
Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5 (1984), pp. 71-180
[Yli-renko et al., 2001]
H. Yli-renko, E. Autio, H.J. Sapienza.
Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms.
Strategic Management Journal, vol 22 (2001), pp. 587-613
[Zander and Kogut, 1995]
U. Zander, B. Kogut.
Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test.
Organization Science, vol. 6 (1995), pp. 76-92
[Zeller, 2001]
C. Zeller.
Clustering Biotech: A Recipe of Success? Spatial Patterns of Growth of Biotechnology in Munich, Rhineland and Hamburg.
Small Business Economics, vol. 17 (2001), pp. 123-141
[Zucker et al., 1998]
L.G. Zucker, M.R. Darby, J. Armstrong.
Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?.
Economic Inquiry, vol. 36 (1998), pp. 65-86
[Zucker et al., 2002]
L.G. Zucker, M.R. Darby, J. Armstrong.
Commercializing Knowledge: University Science. Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology.
Management Science, vol 48 (2002), pp. 138-153
[Zucker et al., 1998b]
L.G. Zucker, M.R. Darby, M.B. Brewer.
Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises.
The American Economic Review, vol. 88 (1998), pp. 290-306
[Zucker et al., 1998c]
Zucker, L.G.; Darby, M.R. y Peng, Y. (1998), «Fundamentals or population dynamics and the geographic distribution of U.S. biotechnology enterprises, 1976–1989», NBER Working Paper Series, n° 6414.

A D. Alfredo A. Quintana Sánchez. In Memoriam. Este trabajo se ha realizado en el marco del Grupo de Investigación «Innovación Tecnológica y Calidad» (SEJ 414) financiado por la Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa de la Junta de Andalucía. Los autores agradecen a Gary Pisano y Tiziana Casciaro, profesores de la Harvard Business School, y a los dos evaluadores anónimos de la revista CEDE los interesantes comentarios que han ayudado a mejorar la versión inicial del presente artículo.

Copyright © 2007. ACEDE
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos