The increase in life expectancy of the general population, the progress made in the treatment of Terminal Chronic Renal Insufficiency (CRI) and the greater survival rates of patients submitted to a regular haemodialysis (HD) programme, have led to an increase in demand for vascular access, as well as to the need for a greater functional duration of these accesses.
The ideal vascular access does not exist, so we must try to make the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) useful and long lasting. The AVF must provide sufficient flow for the HD to be efficient. It must also be simple to channel and permit multiple punctures distributed throughout its trajectory without having to concentrate them in a limited area. The AVF must be easy to monitor and also permit the necessary medico-surgical gestures or repairs to anticipate its failure and avoid its loss. As already mentioned, the AVF must have maximum duration and not be an impediment, when it fails, to carrying out another vascular access.
The arteries and veins that are involved in any AVF must satisfy a series of characteristics for them to be suitable for this function. There must be an absence of significant proximal pathology in the artery and the calibre of its lumen must be 2mm or greater, to guarantee that the blood supply will permit high flows in the fistula. The vein must have a calibre of 2.5mm or more at the point where the anastomosis is going to be carried out; it must be permeable along the entire trajectory, it must have a rectilinear segment that facilitates cannulation; it must be situated at a depth of less than 1cm from the skin and maintain continuity with the proximal central venous system.
Types of vascular accessWe can classify the fistulae into two types, depending on the material used to construct them: autologous fistulae, when a vein from the actual patient is used as a conduit to carry out the fistula, and prosthetic, if material that is alien to the patient is used.
One of the disadvantages of the autologous arteriovenous fistulae is that they require at least four weeks maturation, and ideally it would be necessary to wait three to four months before using it. On the contrary, the prosthetic fistula only requires two weeks’ maturation, although it is advisable to wait until the fourth week.
StrategyThe recommended strategy to plan the execution of a AVF is as follows: the fistula must be prepared as distally as possible to reduce the risk of a medical condition of distal ischemia due to steal or of cardiac overload from developing, giving priority to the non-dominant extremity. An autologous fistula will always be carried out before a prosthetic one. The use of the lower extremity must be avoided and permanent catheters are reserved for those situations where all other AVF options have been exhausted.
Types of anastomosesDifferent types of anastomosis have been used to carry out the AVF, depending on the way the artery and the vein communicate. For its nomenclature, we take the first term of the donor artery and the second term of the receiver vein. These are basically reduced to four: side-to-side anastomosis (which was originally described by Cimino-Brescia), side to end (which is the most commonly one used today), end-to-side and end-to-end. To carry out end-to-side anastomoses, longitudinal arteriotomies are practised, which will measure approximately one and a half times the calibre of the vessel. Later the vein is bevelled with an approximate angle of 45°. The suture is carried out with 6/0 or 7/0 monofilament, non-absorbable material, generally polypropylene.
Sometimes, some type of visual magnifying system (magnifying lenses) can be useful to help make the suture, especially when the fistula is very distal, although in general, this is not necessary.
Defects of anastomosesThe most common defects when performing an anastomosis of this type consist in carry out the suture by taking too much tissue into each stitch, either from the artery or from the vein, which gives rise to stenosis. Another defect is leaving a short segment of vein which causes traction of the artery and possible thrombosis. The venotomy may also be excessive, leaving a redundant anastomotic hood that will generate turbulences and favour thrombosis.
Autologous vascular access in upper extremitiesArteriovenous fistulae can be carried out in the upper extremities in three areas: In the wrist, in the forearm and elbow, and in the arm. The disadvantage of arteriovenous fistulae of the wrist is that there is a higher rate of early failures and lack of maturation. But, on the other hand, if they work correctly they have the advantage of maintaining excellent permeability, with a low complication incidence. They also permit carrying out arteriovenous fistulae in proximal territories in the case of failure. For this reason, normally, this is the location of choice to carry out the first fistula. Three types of fistula can be carried out in the wrist: In the anatomical snuff box, the classic radiocephalic fistula described by Cimino-Brescia and the cubital-basilic fistula. Local anaesthesia is used to carry it out.
The venous and arterial segment is then dissected and the vein is sectioned as described above. After carrying out the local heparinisation and dilating the vein using saline solution, the side-to-end anastomosis is constructed. Fistulae in the anatomical snuff box are rarely used because the vessels in that area have limited calibre and it is in a flexion zone, so the possibilities of failure are greater. The cubital-basilic fistula is resorted to after the failure of the radiocephalic fistula. Before carrying it out, we must verify that the palmar arch and the radial artery are permeable to thus prevent distal ischemia from occurring. Another disadvantage of the latter is that it requires considerable skin detachment to mobilise the basilic vein.
The arteriovenous fistulae in the forearm and elbow may be: radiocephalic fistulae, venous transpositions and fistulae in the elbow flexure carried out with the perforator vein or with the median vein. The advantage of using the perforator vein is that it permits the flow through the cephalic and basilic veins of the arm, as well as from the veins of the palmar side of the forearm. They also have less risk of causing steal syndrome and distal ischemia.
The arteriovenous fistulae of the arm are humeral-cephalic and humeral-basilic fistulae. The latter may be carried out by transposition of the vein or superficialisation of the vein.
Autologous vascular access in lower extremitiesThe autologous vascular accesses of the lower extremities are carried out using the internal saphenous vein. The vein can be placed in a rectilinear assembly or in a U-shaped assembly. In the rectilinear assembly the arterial anastomosis is carried out in the first popliteal portion, the vein is tunnelled subcutaneously on the antero-internal side of the thigh, and the venous anastomosis is carried out in the femoral vein distal to the crook of the internal saphenous vein.
For the U-shaped assembly the vein is extracted and is placed by anastomosing the arterial end in the superficial femoral artery and the venous end in the same way as in the rectilinear assembly after having tunnelled the vein subcutaneously in the anterior side of the thigh.
Prosthetic vascular accessThe prosthetic vascular accesses will always be carried out after having exhausted all the possibilities of executing autologous accesses. They have the advantage of having a relatively simple technique, not requiring a prolonged maturation period and being easy to puncture as the most convenient area to tunnel them can be freely chosen. However, they also have the highest complication rate and require a greater number of revisions, with the subsequent economic cost and impairment of the patient's quality of life.
Different prosthetic materials have been used for vascular accesses. The most commonly used material is ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), although other materials such as polyurethane are also used. Xenografts derived from bovine mesenteric vein or alografts with femoral vein or internal saphenous vein have also been used. The ideal calibre for these channels is not clear, but what nobody questions is that with a lumen of less than 6mm, there are considerable probabilities of occlusion, and if it is greater than 6mm, the possibilities increase of developing an arterial steal syndrome or cardiac volume overload. To avoid these situations, tapered prostheses with a greater calibre at entry and smaller calibre at exit have been used. The length of the prosthesis varies between 20 and 40cm in order to provide a minimum of 15cm trajectory to carry out the punctures. They can be implanted in a straight or U-shaped position. Whenever a prosthesis is implanted, carrying out an antibiotic prophylaxis is inexcusable given that the prosthetic materials are especially susceptible to infection during implantation and they do not possess the defence mechanisms that protect the autologous fistulae.
Alternative vascular accessThis group includes those vascular accesses that are not carried out on a routine basis, and those that must be resorted to when the normal autologous or prosthetic vascular access possibilities have been exhausted. This type of access can be carried out on the anterior side of the thorax taking the axillary or subclavian artery as the donor artery and the axillary or jugular vein as the receiving vein. The position of the prosthesis may be U-shaped, tunnelling the prosthesis subcutaneously on the pectoralis major muscle or crossing over the anterior side of the sternum from one axillary vessel to another contralateral one.
The abdominal vessels can also be resorted to, where the external iliac artery or the common femoral artery is the donor artery and the iliac vein or inferior cava is the receiving vein. In both cases an attempt must be made to carry out the anastomoses as distal as possible to minimise the risk of steal syndrome. The prosthesis can be tunnelled subcutaneously in the iliac fossa or on the antero-external side of the thigh.