covid
Buscar en
Endocrinología y Nutrición
Toda la web
Inicio Endocrinología y Nutrición Reflexiones sobre la nutrición artificial domiciliaria
Información de la revista
Vol. 49. Núm. 7.
Páginas 227-231 (agosto 2002)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 49. Núm. 7.
Páginas 227-231 (agosto 2002)
Acceso a texto completo
Reflexiones sobre la nutrición artificial domiciliaria
Reflections On Home Nutrition Therapy
Visitas
4757
M. Planas
Autor para correspondencia
mplanas@hg.vhebron.es

Correspondencia: Dra. M. Planas. Hospital Vall d’ Hebron. Unidad de Soporte Nutricional. P.° Vall d’ Hebron, 119-129. 08035 Barcelona.
, R. Burgos
Unitat de Suport Nutricional. Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Barcelona
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo

La nutrición artificial domiciliaria (NAD) o administración de nutrientes a través de la vía digestiva o intravenosa, como los demás tratamientos administrados a domicilio, están en fase de crecimiento por las implicaciones sociosanitarias que comportan, pero su éxito requiere el control por parte de un equipo de soporte nutritivo multidisciplinario y la aplicación sistemática de un plan estratégico de actuación y seguimiento que englobe desde la correcta selección del paciente al proceso de transferencia del hospital a domicilio, el adiestramiento en la técnica del paciente, familiar o cuidador, las consideraciones de financiación, el plan de actuación y cuidados, etc., todo ello encaminado a conseguir unos objetivos previamente definidos que se revisarán periódicamente suspendiéndose cuando ya no aporten ningún beneficio al paciente. Si bien la incidencia de NAD no está perfectamente conocida por depender de la existencia o no de registros voluntarios, su implementación en nuestro país está en niveles muy inferiores a otros países europeos comparables (Italia, Francia). Las principales indicaciones de esta modalidad terapéutica administrada por vía enteral son los trastornos de la deglución de cualquier etiología, mientras que el uso de la administración parenteral predomina en pacientes con síndrome de intestino corto o con obstrucción intestinal. A pesar de los motivos de discusión que comporta administrar este tratamiento a pacientes terminales o a neoplásicos no subsidiarios de tratamiento curativo, su uso debe ser discutido de forma individual después de un buen conocimiento por parte del paciente y la familia de las ventajas e inconvenientes de cada tratamiento.

Palabras clave:
Nutrición artificial domiciliaria
Nutrición enteral domiciliaria
Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria

Home nutrition therapy (HNT), or the provision of nutrients and any necessary adjunctive therapeutic agents to patients through administration into the stomach or intestine or through intravenous infusion, is a relatively new therapy which, like all other treatments administered in the nonhospital setting, is increasing every year due to social, medical and economic factors. However, the success of this therapy requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary nutritional support team and the development and application of guidelines that include well-defined selection criteria, the transfer from the hospital to the home, the educational strategy, the financial implications, and the treatment plan and implementation standards. All these elements should be directed to obtain previously defined aims that should be periodically reviewed and the treatment should be withdrawn when it is not beneficial to the patient. Although the extent of use of this therapy is not fully known because data are gathered in voluntary registers, its implementation in Spain is lower than that in similar European countries (Italy and France). The major indications of home enteral nutrition are swallowing disorders of various etiology, while the major indications for home parenteral nutrition are severe short bowel syndrome and bowel obstruction. Although controversy surrounds nutritional support in inpatients with severe disabilities or terminal cancer, the use of this therapy should be analyzed individually and patients/relatives should receive realistic information about its advantages and disadvantages.

Key words:
Home nutrition therapy
Home enteral nutrition
Home parenteral nutrition
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Biblografía
[1.]
L.A. Gorski.
Enteral and parenteral nutrition.
Best practices in home infusion therapy, pp. 1-43
[2.]
ASPEN Board of Directors.
Standards for home nutrition support.
Nutr Clin Pract, 13 (1999), pp. 157-166
[3.]
M. Elia.
An international perspective on artificial nutrition support in the community.
Lancet, 345 (1995), pp. 1345-1349
[4.]
G.L. Klein, J.Z. Rogers, J. Friedmann, G.L. Jensen.
A multidisciplinary approach to home enteral nutrition.
Nutr Clin Pract, 13 (1998), pp. 157-162
[5.]
M.E. Shils, W.L. Wright, A. Turnbull, F. Brescia.
Long term parenteral nutrition through external arteriovenous shunt.
N Engl J Med, 283 (1970), pp. 341-344
[6.]
L. Howard, L. Heaphey, C.R. Fleming, L. Lininger, E. Steiger.
Four years of North America Registry: home parenteral nutrition outcome data and their implications for patient management.
JPEN, 15 (1991), pp. 384-393
[7.]
North American Home Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Patient Registry.
Annual Report with outcome profile 1985-1991 Albany.
The Oley Foundation, 1 (1993),
[8.]
M. Elia.
Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the community: a report by a working group party of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN).
[9.]
M. Mughal, M. Irving.
Home parenteral nutrition in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Lancet, 2 (1986), pp. 383-387
[10.]
M. Fada, F. Veglia, A. Vuolo.
Nutrizione parenterale domiciliare valutazione dei risultati del periodo 1980-88 Servizio di Dietetica e Nutrizione Clinica-Ospedale.
Molinette, Torino, (1989),
[11.]
A. Van Gossum, H. Bakker, A. De Francesco, K. Ladefoged, M. Leon-Sanz, B. Messing, et al.
Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a multicentre survey in Europe in 1993 ESPEN-Home Artficial Nutrition Working Group.
Clin Nutr, 15 (1996), pp. 53-59
[12.]
A. Van Gossum, H. Bakker, F. Bozzetti, M. Staun, M. Leon-Sanz, X. Hebuterne, et al.
Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey in 1997.
Clin Nutr, 18 (1999), pp. 135-140
[13.]
Grupo NADYA-SENPE.
Nutrición enteral domiciliaria.
Registro nacional 1999 Nutr Hosp, 16 (2001), pp. 63
[14.]
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.
Standards for home nutrition support.
Nutr Clin Pract, 5 (1988), pp. 202-205
[15.]
M. Hermann-Zaidins, R. Touger-Decker.
Supply and management structures.
Nutrition support in home health, pp. 25-39
[16.]
J.M. Moreno, J. Shaffer, M. Staun, X. Hebuterne, F. Bozzetti, M. Pertkiewicz, et al.
Survey on legislation and funding of home artificial nutrition in different European countries.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 117-123
[17.]
L. Pironi.
Cost-benefit of home artificial nutrition regulation.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 101-102
[18.]
L. Howard.
Home parenteral nutrition: a transatlantic view.
Clin Nutr, 18 (1999), pp. 131-133
[19.]
L. Howard, M. Malone, S. Murray, L. Ellis.
Management of patients on home parenteral and enteral nutrition.
Nutrition support: theory and therapeutics, pp. 563-587
[20.]
G.L. Klein, J.Z. Rogers, J. Friedmann, G.L. Jensen.
A multidisciplinary approach to Home Enteral Nutrition.
N Clin Pract, 13 (1998), pp. 157-162
[21.]
J.K. Nelson, P.J. Palumbo, P.C. O'Brien.
Home enteral nutrition: observation of a newly established program.
Nutr Clin Pract, 1 (1986), pp. 193-199
[22.]
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of South Carolina.
PEN advisory for parenteral nutrition therapy suppliers, (1987),
[23.]
M.M. Echenique.
Home nutrition support of advanced cancer patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or dysfunction.
Nutr Clin Pract, 14 (1999), pp. 36-37
[24.]
F. Bozzetti, V. Bozzetti.
Home artificial nutrition in incurable cancer patients: rationales and ethics.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 23-27
[25.]
F. Contaldo, F. Pasanisi.
Appropriate use of (home) artificial nutrition: ethical implications.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 35-38
[26.]
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.
Standards for home nutrition support.
Nutr Clin Pract, 7 (1992), pp. 65-69
[27.]
Position of The American Dietetic Association.
The role of the registered dietitian in enteral and parenteral nutrition support.
J Am Diet Assoc, 91 (1991), pp. 1440-1441
[28.]
D.C. Pantalos.
Home health care: a new worksite for dietitians monitoring nutrition support.
J Am Diet Assoc, 93 (1993), pp. 1146-1151
[29.]
J. Weckwerth, C. Ireton-Jones.
Nutrition support in home care.
Contemporary nutrition support practice: a clinical guide, pp. 611-623
[30.]
R.F. Kushner, E.A. Ayello, P.L. Beyer, A. Skipper, C.W. Van Way 3rd, E.A. Young.
National Coordinating Committee for Nutrition Standards-clinical indicators of nutrition care.
J Am Diet Assoc, 94 (1994), pp. 1168-1177
[31.]
B. Messing.
Long-term outcome and quality of life of adult patients on home parenteral nutrition.
Clin Nutr, 14 (1995), pp. 24-27
[32.]
M. Canduso, L. Giglio, D. Faraguna.
Long-term home parenteral nutrition in children.
Clin Nutr, 14 (1995), pp. 28-32
[33.]
B. Messing.
A view from France: audit of adult home parenteral long-term feeders.
Nutrition, 12 (1996), pp. 825-826
[34.]
G.L. Carlson, G. Maguire, N. Williams, A. Bradley, J.L. Shaffer, M.H. Irving.
Quality of life on home parenteral nutrition: a single centre study of 37 patients.
Clin Nutr, 14 (1995), pp. 219-228
[35.]
P.B. Jeppesen, E. Langholz, P.B. Mortensen.
Quality of life in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition.
Gut, 44 (1999), pp. 844-852
[36.]
A. De Francesco, D. Boggio Bertinet, M. Fadda, P. Gallenca, G. Malfi, A. Palmo.
Long-term parenteral nutrition in adults: outcomes and quality of life.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 3-5
[37.]
Y. Panis.
Short bowel syndrome: surgical options.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 11-14
[38.]
O. Goulet, F. Lacaille, D. Jan, C. Ricour, Y. Revillon.
Intestinal transplantation.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 15-22
[39.]
A. Van Gossum, K. Vahedi, K. Abdel-Mali, M. Staun, M. Pertkiewicz, J. Shaffer, et al.
Clinical, social and rehabilitation status of long-term home parenteral nutrition patients: results of a European multicentre survey.
Clin Nutr, 20 (2001), pp. 205-210
[40.]
S.H. Dzierba, J.M. Mirtallo, D.W. Grauer, P.J. Schneider, C.J. Latiolais, P.J. Fabri.
Fiscal and clinical evaluation of home parenteral nutrition.
Am J Hosp Pharm, 41 (1984), pp. 285
[41.]
V. Goel.
Economics of total parenteral nutrition.
Nutrition, 6 (1990), pp. 332-335
[42.]
S. Curtas, R. Hariri, E. Steiger.
Case management in home total parenteral nutrition: a cost-identification analysis.
JPEN, 20 (1996), pp. 113-119
Copyright © 2002. Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos