metricas
covid
Buscar en
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
Toda la web
Inicio Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica Utilidad clínica de atazanavir
Información de la revista
Vol. 26. Núm. S17.
Atazanavir
Páginas 55-67 (diciembre 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 26. Núm. S17.
Atazanavir
Páginas 55-67 (diciembre 2008)
Acceso a texto completo
Utilidad clínica de atazanavir
Clinical utility of atazanavir
Visitas
2608
Esteban Ribera Pascuet
Autor para correspondencia
eribera@vhebron.net

Correspondencia: Dr. E. Ribera Pascuet. Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Sexta planta. Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron. Paseo Vall d’Hebron, 119-129. 08035 Barcelona. España.
, Adrià Curran
Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron. Barcelona. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas

Atazanavir (ATV) es un inhibidor de la proteasa (IP) cuyas principales cualidades en comparación con los otros IP son la cómoda dosificación, la buena tolerabilidad y el excelente perfil metabólico. Estas características hacen que se asemeje más a un no nucleósido que a un IP, pero con la elevada barrera genética propia de los IP. Está indicado en el tratamiento inicial, en la simplificación del tratamiento o el cambio por toxicidad, y en las primeras líneas de rescate. En Europa se ha aprobado la administración de ATV potenciado con ritonavir (300/100 mg/día) en todos los escenarios clínicos. En pacientes naïve se ha combinado con prácticamente todas la parejas de análogos de los nucleósidos y ha demostrado ser tan eficaz como lopinavir/ritonavir e incluso como efavirenz. En Estados Unidos, esta indicación está aprobada desde hace casi 5 años y ATV se ha convertido en el IP más prescrito, mientras que la Asociación Europea del Medicamento (EMEA) la ha aprobado este año. ATV es un fármaco óptimo para sustituir a otros antirretrovirales en estrategias de simplificación o cambios por toxicidad. En varios estudios se ha demostrado que en pacientes con buen control virológico puede sustituir a lopinavir/r o a otro IP, manteniéndose la eficacia terapéutica, con una excelente tolerabilidad y una mejoría del perfil lipídico, y con una disminución del riesgo cardiovascular. Esta estrategia es ampliamente utilizada en España. En este escenario, algunos pacientes podrían beneficiarse del tratamiento con ATV no potenciado (400 mg/día). ATV es una opción eficaz y muy atractiva en las primeras líneas de rescate en que el virus muestra escasa o nula resistencia a los IP, pues su simplicidad y tolerabilidad pueden mejorar los problemas de adhesión, principal causa de los fracasos terapéuticos. En pacientes con resistencia moderada a los IP, ATV es tan eficaz como LPV/r. La supervivencia de los pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) es cada vez más prolongada y cobran mayor importancia factores como la tolerabilidad, el riesgo cardiovascular y la adaptabilidad del tratamiento a la vida del paciente, por lo cual ATV debe desempeñar un importante papel en el tratamiento de la infección por el VIH.

Palabras clave:
Atazanavir
Inhibidores de la proteasa
Infección por el VIH
Tratamiento inicial
Simplificación de tratamiento
Tratamiento de rescate

Atazanavir (ATV) is a protease inhibitor (PI) in which its main qualities, compared to other PI are dosing convenience, good tolerability and excellent metabolic profile. These characteristics makes it more like a nonnucleoside than a PI, but with the increased genetic barrier common to PI. It is indicated in initial treatment, simplification treatment or a change due to toxicity and in first line rescue treatment. The administering of ATV boosted with ritonavir (300/100 mg/d) has been approved in Europe in all clinical situations. In naïve patients it has been combined with practically all the nucleoside analogue pairs and has shown to be as effective as lopinavir/ritonavir and even efavirenz. In the USA, this indication has been approved for almost 5 years and ATV has become the most prescribed PI, while the EMEA has approved it this year. ATV is an optimal drug to replace other antiretrovirals in simplification strategies or changes due to toxicity. In several studies it has been shown that, in patients with good virological control, it can LPV/r or another PI, the therapeutic efficacy being maintained, with excellent tolerance and an improved lipid profile, and decreasing the cardiovascular risk. This strategy is widely used in Spain. In this scenario some patients could benefit from non-boosted ATV treatment (400 mg/d). ATV is an effective and very attractive option in first line rescue treatments in which the virus shows little or no resistance to PI, as its simplicity and tolerability can improve problems with compliance, the main cause of therapeutic failure. In patients with moderate resistance to PI, ATV is as effective as LPV/r. The survival of patients with HIV infection is increasingly longer and factors such as tolerability, cardiovascular risk and the adaptability of the treatment to the lifestyle of the patient, become more important, therefore ATV must play an important role in the treatment of HIV-infection.

Key words:
Atazanavir
Protease inhibitors
HIV infection
Initial treatment
Simplification treatment
Rescue treatment
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J. Molina, J. Andrade-Villanueva, P. Echevarria, P. Chetchotisakd, J. Corral, N. David, et al.
Efficacy and safety of boosted once-daily atazanavir and twice- daily lopinavir regimens in treatment-naïve HIV-1infected subjects. CASTLE: 48 Week results.
15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections,
[2.]
Recomendaciones de GESIDA/Plan Nacional sobre el SIDA respecto al tratamiento antirretroviral en adultos infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana. Actualización enero 2008 [accedido 12 Jun 2008]. Disponible en: http://www.gesida.seimc.org/index.asp.
[3.]
European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS). Guidelines for the clinical management and treatment of HIV infected adults in Europe [accedido 12 Jun 2008]. Disponible en: www.eacs.eu/guide/index.htm
[4.]
Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adult and Adolescents Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. January 29, 2008; 1-128 [accedido 12 Mar 2008]. Disponible en: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.
[5.]
S.M. Hammer, J.J. Eron Jr., P. Reiss, R.T. Schooley, M.A. Thompson, S. Walmsleys, et al.
International AIDS Society-USA. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2008 recommendations of the international AIDS Society-USA panel.
JAMA, 300 (2008), pp. 555-570
[6.]
A.N. Phillips, A. Carr, J. Neuhaus, F. Visnegarwala, R. Prineas, W.J. Burman, et al.
Interruption of antiretroviral therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease in persons with HIV-1 infection: exploratory analyses from the SMART trial.
Antivir Ther, 13 (2008), pp. 177-187
[7.]
S. Moreno, B. Hernández, F. Dronda.
Eficacia de atazanavir en pacientes sin tratamiento previo.
Enf Infecc Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 9-13
[8.]
L. Zamora, J.M. Gatell.
Atazanavir en simplificación de tratamiento.
Enf Infecc Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 14-21
[9.]
J. Portilla, V. Boix, E. Merino, S. Reus.
Atazanavir en terapias de rescate.
Enf Infec Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 22-27
[10.]
T.T. Vo, B. Ledergerber, O. Keiser, B. Hirschel, H. Furrer, M. Battegay, et al.
Durability and outcome of initial antiretroviral treatments received during 2000-2005 by patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.
J Infect Dis, 197 (2008), pp. 1685-1694
[11.]
R. Palacios, M. González, J. Ruiz, J. Santos.
Efectos adversos de atazanavir.
Enf Infec Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 41-44
[12.]
E. Martinez.
Perfil lipídico de atazanavir.
Enf Infec Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 34-40
[13.]
R. Palacios, I. Aguilar, J. Santos.
Atazanavir.
Tratamiento de la Infección por VIH-SIDA. Fármacos y combinaciones, pp. 131-140
[14.]
Knobel H, Polo R, Escobar I. Recomendaciones GESIDA/SEFH/PNS para mejorar la adherencia al tratamiento antirretroviral. Actualización junio 2008 [accedido 30 Jun 2008]. Disponible en: http://www.gesida.seimc.org/pcientifica/fuentes/DcyRc/Gesida_dcyrc2008_adherenciaTAR.pdf.
[15.]
E. Ribera, K. Aguirrebengoa, C. Miralles, A. Antela, A. Rivero, J.R. Arribas.
Simplificación del tratamiento antiretroviral.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 20 (2002), pp. 48-57
[16.]
M. Youle.
Overview of boosted protease inhibitors in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 60 (2007), pp. 1195-1205
[17.]
J. Ananworanich, B. Hirschel, S. Sirivichayakul, S. Ubolyam, T. Jupimai, W. Prasithsirikul, et al.
Absence of resistance mutations in antiretroviral-naïve patients treated with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir.
Antivir Ther, 11 (2006), pp. 631-635
[18.]
S. MacManus, P.J. Yates, R.C. Elston, S. White, N. Richards, W. Snowden.
GW433908/ritonavir once daily in antiretroviral therapy-naïve HIV-infected patients: absence of protease resistance at 48 weeks.
AIDS, 18 (2004), pp. 651-655
[19.]
V.D. Lima, V.S. Gill, B. Yip, R.S. Hogg, J.S. Montaner, P.R. Harrigan.
Increased resilience to the development of drug resistance with modern boosted protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.
J Infect Dis, 198 (2008), pp. 51-58
[20.]
M. Johnson, B. Grinsztejn, C. Rodriguez, J. Coco, E. DeJesus, A. Lazzarin, et al.
96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures.
[21.]
R.C. Elston, P. Yates, M. Tisdale, N. Richards, S. White, E. DeJesus.
GW433908/ritonavir: 48 week results in PI-experienced subjects: a retrospective analysis of virological response based on baseline genotype and phenotype.
Program and abstracts of the XV International AIDS Conference; July 11-16,
[22.]
C. De Mendoza, L. Valer, E. Ribera, P. Barreiro, L. Martín-Carbonero, G. Ramirez, et al.
Performance of six different ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in heavily antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients.
HIV Clin Trials, 7 (2006), pp. 163-171
[23.]
J.V. Madruga, D. Berger, M. McMurchie, F. Suter, D. Banhegyi, K. Ruxrungtham, et al.
Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lo-pinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trial.
[24.]
E. Ribera, J.C. Juarez, B. Mortoro.
Fitoterapia e infección por el VIH. Interacciones entre fármacos antirretrovirales y plantas medicinales.
Gráficas Enar S.A., (2007),
[25.]
L.F. López-Cortés.
Farmacología, aspectos farmacocinéticos e interacciones de atazanavir.
Enf Infec Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 2-8
[26.]
N. Von Hentig.
Atazanavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in HIV therapy.
Drugs Today (Barc), 44 (2008), pp. 103-132
[27.]
K. Tashima, S. Staszewski, M. Nelson, A. Rachlis, D. Skiest, R. Stryker, et al.
Efficacy and tolerability of long-term efavirenz plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV-1 infection.
[28.]
R.L. Murphy, B.A. Da Silva, C.B. Hicks, J.J. Eron, R.M. Gulick, M.A. Thompson, et al.
Seven-year efficacy of a lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen in antiretroviralnaïve HIV-1-infected patients.
HIV Clin Trials, 9 (2008), pp. 1-10
[29.]
G.K. Robbins, V. De Gruttola, R.W. Shafer, L.M. Smeaton, S.W. Snyder, C. Pettinelli, et al.
Comparison of secuential three-drug regimens as inicial therapy for HIV-1 infection.
N Engl J Med, 49 (2003), pp. 2293-2303
[30.]
S. Staszewski, J. Morales-Ramirez, K.T. Tashima, A. Rachlis, D. Skiest, J. Stanford, et al.
Efavirenz plus zidovudine and lamivudine, efavirenz plus indinavir, and indinavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine in the treatment of HIV?1 infection in adults. Study 006 Team.
N Engl J Med, 341 (1999), pp. 1865-1873
[31.]
Montaner JSG, Schutz M, Schwartz R, Jayaweera DT, Burnside AF, Walmsley S, et al. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir soft-gelatin capsule/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients. eJIAS [accedido 23 Dic 2007]. Disponible en: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/528558
[32.]
J.A. Bartlett, J. Johnson, G. Herrera, N. Sosa, A. Rodriguez, Q. Liao, et al.
Clinically significant long-term antiretroviral sequential sequencing study (CLASS) team. Long-term results of initial therapy with abacavir and lamivudine combined with efavirenz, amprenavir/ritonavir, or stavudine.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 43 (2006), pp. 284-292
[33.]
K. Squires, A. Lazzarin, J.M. Gatell, W.G. Powderly, V. Pokrovskiy, J.F. Delfraissy, et al.
Comparison of once-daily atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combination with fixed-dose zidovudine and lamivudine, as initial therapy for patients infected with HIV.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 36 (2004), pp. 1011-1019
[34.]
S.A. Riddler, R. Haubrich, A.G. DiRienzo, L. Peeples, W.G. Powderly, K.L. Klingman, et al.
Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection.
N Engl J Med, 358 (2008), pp. 2095-2106
[35.]
Eron F J.r., P. Yeni, Gathe F J.r., V. Estrada, E. DeJesus, S. Staszewski, et al.
The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 weeks: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
[36.]
S. Walmsley, K. Ruxrungtham, J. Slim, D. Ward, P. Larson, F.L. Raffi.
Saquinavir/r (SQV/r) bid versus lopinavir/r (LPV/r) BID, plus emtricitabine/tenofovir (FTC/TDF) qd as initial therapy in HIV-1-infected patients: The Gemini Study.
11th European AIDS Conference,
[37.]
R. Ortiz, E. Dejesus, H. Khanlou, E. Voronin, J. Van Lunzen, J. Andrade-Villanueva, et al.
Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48.
[38.]
British HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy 2008;1-59 [accedido 8 sep 08].Disponible en: http://www.bhiva.org/files/file 1030835.pdf.
[39.]
K. Smith, W. Weinberg, E. DeJesus, M.A. Fischl, Q. Liao, L.L. Ross, et al.
Fosamprenavir or atazanavir once daily boosted with ritonavir 100 mg, plus tenofovir/emcitrabine, for the initial treatment of HIV infection: 48-week results of ALERT.
AIDS Res Ther, 5 (2008), pp. 5
[40.]
R. Elion, C. Cohen, D. Ward.
Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, adherence, and treatment satisfaction with boosted atazanavir and fixed- dose emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (Truvada) given once-daily in hiv infected, antiretroviral naïve subjects: final results of BATON.
11th European AIDS Conference,
[41.]
R. Elion, E. DeJesus, M. Sension, D. Berger, W. Towner, G. Richmond, et al.
Once-daily abacavir/lamivudine and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in antiretroviral-naïve patients: a 48-week pilot study.
HIV Clin Trials, 9 (2008), pp. 152-163
[42.]
D.R. Malan, E. Krantz, N. David, V. Wirtz, J. Hammond, McGrath D; 089 Study Group.
Efficacy and safety of atazanavir, with or without ritonavir, as part of once-daily highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviralnaïve patients.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 47 (2008), pp. 161-167
[43.]
R.L. Murphy, I. Sanne, P. Cahn, P. Phanuphak, L. Percival, T. Kelleher, et al.
Dose-ranging, randomized, clinical trial of atazanavir with lamivudine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: 48-week results.
[44.]
I. Sanne, P. Piliero, K. Squires, A. Hiry, S. Schnittman, AI424-007 Clinical Trial Group.
Results of a phase 2 clinical trial at 48 weeks (AI424-007): a dose-ranging, safety, and efficacy comparative trial of atazanavir at three doses in combination with didanosine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naivesubjects.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 32 (2003), pp. 18-29
[45.]
R. Colonno, R. Rose, C. McLaren, A. Thiry, N. Parkin, J. Friborg.
Identification of I50L as the signature atazanavir (ATV)-resistance mutation in treatmentnaïve HIV-1-infected patients receiving ATV-containing regimens.
J Infect Dis, 189 (2004), pp. 1802-1810
[46.]
S. Weinheimer, L. Discotto, J. Friborg, H. Yang, R. Colonno.
Atazanavir signature I50L resistance substitution accounts for unique phenotype of increased susceptibility to other protease inhibitors in a variety of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genetic backbones.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 3816-3824
[47.]
Yanchunas F J.r., D.R. Langley, L. Tao, R.E. Rose, J. Friborg, R.J. Colonno, et al.
Molecular basis for increased susceptibility of isolates with atazanavir resistance- conferring substitution I50L to other protease inhibitors.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 3825-3832
[48.]
E. Martinez, J.A. Arnaiz, D. Podzamczer, D. Dalmau, E. Ribera, P. Domingo, et al.
Substitution of nevirapine, efavirenz, or abacavir for protease inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.
N Engl J Med, 349 (2003), pp. 1036-1046
[49.]
J. Gatell, D. Salmon-Ceron, A. Lazzarin, E. Van Wijngaerden, F. Antunes, C. Leen, et al.
Efficacy and safety of atazanavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with virologic suppression switched from a stable, boosted or unboosted protease inhibitor treatment regimen: the SWAN Study (AI424-097) 48-week results.
Clin Infect Dis, 44 (2007), pp. 1484-1492
[50.]
J. Mallolas, D. Podzamczer, P. Domingo, B. Clotet, E. Ribera, F. Gutierrez, et al.
Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir to boosted atazanavir in patients with virologic suppression receiving a lopinavir/ritonavir-containing HAART: the ATAZIP study.
4th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention,
[51.]
V. Soriano, P. García-Gascó, E. Vispo, A. Ruiz-Sancho, F. Blanco, L. Martín-Carbonero, et al.
Efficacy and safety of replacing lopinavir with atazanavir in HIV-infected patients with undetectable plasma viraemia: final results of the SLOAT trial.
J Antimcrob Chemother, 61 (2008), pp. 200-205
[52.]
S. Rodríguez-Nóvoa, J. Morello, P. Barreiro, I. Maida, P. García-Gascó, E. Vispo, et al.
Switch from ritonavir-boosted to unboosted atazanavir guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses, 24 (2008), pp. 821-825
[53.]
E. Ribera, J. González, A. Prieto, E. Condes, C. Martín Ruiz, J. Vergaset, et al.
Uso de tenofovir DF en combinación con atazanavir potenciado y no potenciado pacientes infectados por el VIH-1. Subanálisis de la cohorte española PROTECTION.
XIII Congreso de la SEIMC,
[54.]
S. Swindells, A.G. DiRienzo, T. Wilkin, C.V. Fletcher, D.M. Margolis, G.D. Thal, AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5201 Study Team, et al.
Regimen simplification to atazanavir-ritonavir alone as maintenance antiretroviral therapy after sustained virologic suppression.
JAMA, 296 (2006), pp. 806-814
[55.]
Jiménez-Nácher I, García B, Barreiro P, Rodriguez-Novoa S, Morello J, González- Lahoz J, et al. Trends in the prescription of antiretroviral drugs and impact on plasma HIV-RNA measurements. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008. En prensa.
[56.]
R.C. Elston, P. Yates, M. Tisdale, N. Richards, S. White, E. DeJesus.
GW433908 (908)/ritonavir (r): 48 week results in PI-experienced subjects: a retrospective analysis of virological response based on baseline genotype and phenotype.
XV International AIDS Conference,
[57.]
U.B. Dragsted, J. Gerstoft, M. Youle, Z. Fox, M. Losso, J. Benetucci, et al.
A randomized trial to evaluate lopinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients: the MaxCmin2 trial.
Antivir Ther, 10 (2005), pp. 735-743
[58.]
M. Johnson, B. Grinsztejn, C. Rodriguez, J. Coco, E. DeJesus, A. Lazzarin, et al.
Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures.
AIDS, 19 (2005), pp. 153-162
[59.]
C. Cohen, L. Nieto-Cisneros, C. Zala, W.J. Fessel, J. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Gladysz, et al.
Comparison of atazanavir with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with prior protease inhibitor failure: a randomized multinational trial.
Curr Med Res Opin, 21 (2005), pp. 1683-1692
[60.]
E. Ribera, C. Azuaje, R.M. Lopez, M. Diaz, M. Feijoo, L. Pou, et al.
Atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir: pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a promising double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen.
[61.]
A. Winston, P.W. Mallon, C. Satchell, K. MacRae, K.M. Williams, M. Schutz, et al.
The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of a switch in antiretroviral therapy to saquinavir, ritonavir, and atazanavir alone for 48 weeks and a switch in the saquinavir formulation.
Clin Infect Dis, 44 (2007), pp. 1475-1483
[62.]
Ribera E, Curran A. Double-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral regimens: what role? Drugs. 2008. En prensa.
[63.]
J. Witek, S. McCallister, L. Odeshoo.
Safety of atazanavir (ATV) and ATV/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) in patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B and/or C: 1100 patients-years of treatment exposure.
16th International AIDS Conference, Aug 13-18,
[64.]
A. Rivero, A. Camacho, I. Pérez-Camacho, J. Torre-Cisneros.
Atazanavir en la coinfección por VIH y virus de la hepatitis B y/o C.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 45-48
[65.]
M. Noor, O. Flint, J. Maa, R. Parker.
Effects of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir on glucose uptake and insulin sensitivity: demonstrable differences in vitro and clinically.
[66.]
U. Möbius, M. Lubach-Ruitman, B. Castro-Frenzel, M. Stoll, S. Esser, E. Voigt, et al.
Switching to atazanavir improves metabolic disorders in antiretroviral- experienced patients with severe hyperlipidemia.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 39 (2005), pp. 174-180
[67.]
M. Colafigli, S. Di Giambenedetto, L. Bracciale, E. Tamburrini, R. Cauda, A. De Luca.
Cardiovascular risk score change in HIV-1-infected patients switched to an atazanavir-based combination antiretroviral regimen.
HIV Medicine, 9 (2008), pp. 172-179
[68.]
D. Ripamonti, D. Cattaneo, F. Maggiolo, M. Airoldi, L. Frigerio, P. Bertuletti, et al.
Atazanavir plus low-dose ritonavir in pregnancy: pharmacokinetics and placental transfer.
AIDS, 21 (2007), pp. 2409-2415
[69.]
C. Ferreira, C. Floch-Tudal, F. Meier, G. Peytavin, J. Treluyer, V. Jullien, et al.
Atazanavir in pregnancy: influence on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.
15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, (2008),
[70.]
M. Natha, P. Hay, G. Taylor, G. Brook, L. Sarner, L. Cunningham, et al.
Atazanavir use in pregnancy: a report of 33 cases.
14th Conference on Retoviruses and Opportunistic Infections,
[71.]
T. Eley, E. Vandeloise, M. Child, F. Conradie, C. Zorrilla, D. Josipovic, et al.
Steady state pharmacokinetics and safety of atazanavir after treatment with ATV 300 mg once daily/ritonavir 100 mg once daily + ZDV/3TC during the third trimester in HIV+ women.
15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections,
[72.]
A. Antela.
Utilidad de atazanavir en poblaciones especiales.
Enf Infec Microbiol Clin, 26 (2008), pp. 49-54
Copyright © 2008. Elsevier España S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos