metricas
covid
Buscar en
Gastroenterología y Hepatología
Toda la web
Inicio Gastroenterología y Hepatología Sedación en la endoscopia digestiva. Resultados de una encuesta hospitalaria en...
Información de la revista
Vol. 27. Núm. 9.
Páginas 503-507 (enero 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 27. Núm. 9.
Páginas 503-507 (enero 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
Sedación en la endoscopia digestiva. Resultados de una encuesta hospitalaria en Cataluña
Sedation In Digestive Endoscopy. Results Of A Hospital Survey In Catalonia (Spain)
Visitas
6592
R. Campoa,
Autor para correspondencia
rcampo@cspt.es

Correspondencia: Dr. R. Campo. Endoscopia Digestiva. Corporació Parc Taulí. Parc Taulí, s/n. 08208 Sabadell. Barcelona. España.
, E. Brulleta, F. Junqueraa, V. Puig-Divía, M. Vergaraa, X. Calveta, J. Marcob, M. Chuecosa, A. Sáncheza, A. Alcázara, M. Ruiza, M. Puiga, J. Realc
a Servicio de Aparato Digestivo. Corporació Parc Taulí. Sabadell. Barcelona
b Servicio de Anestesiología. Corporació Parc Taulí. Sabadell. Barcelona
c Sección de Epidemiología. Corporació Parc Taulí. Sabadell. Barcelona. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Introducción

La práctica de sedación es una necesidad creciente en las unidades de endoscopia digestiva (UED). No se dispone de datos sobre el uso de sedación en las UED de Cataluña.

Objetivo

Evaluar el uso de sedación en las UED de Cataluña.

Material Y Método

Se elaboró una encuesta sobre hábitos de sedación que fue remitida a los responsables médicos y de enfermería de las UED de 63 hospitales públicos y privados de Cataluña. Se efectuaron 2 envíos con un intervalo de 3 meses. Dicha encuesta incluía 62 preguntas sobre aspectos relacionados con las características del hospital y la UED, el número de exploraciones, la frecuencia de uso de sedación, los fármacos utilizados, la participación del anestesiólogo, el empleo de monitorización y las complicaciones.

Resultados

Un total de 44 UED (70%) correspondientes a 31 hospitales públicos y 13 privados respondió a la encuesta. Los hábitos de sedación fueron evaluados sobre un total de 105.904 exploraciones realizadas en el año 2001 en las diferentes UED (56.453 gastroscopias, 47.278 colonoscopias y 2.173 colangiopancreatografías retrógradas endoscópicas [CPRE]). Se utilizó sedación, sedación-analgesia o anestesia en el 17% de las gastroscopias, el 61% de las colonoscopias y el 100% de las CPRE. El anestesiólogo participó en la sedación del 7% de las gastroscopias, en el 25% de las colonoscopias y en el 38% de las CPRE, y con mayor frecuencia en los centros privados que en los públicos (gastroscopias, el 25 frente al 2%; colonoscopias, el 57 frente al 9%; p < 0,001). No se refirió ningún caso de muerte relacionada con el uso de sedación. Un 89% de las UED cumplía las recomendaciones estándar para la práctica de sedación.

Conclusiones

En Cataluña, el uso de sedación es muy variable según el procedimiento endoscópico y las diferentes UED. Se emplea escasamente en la gastroscopia, es bastante utilizada en la colonoscopia y sistemática en la CPRE. En los hospitales privados, el anestesiólogo interviene con mayor frecuencia de forma significativa. La gran mayoría de las UED sigue los estándares de sedación.

Introduction

The need for sedation is increasing in digestive endoscopy units (DEU). There are no data on the use of sedation in DEU in Catalonia (Spain).

Objective

To evaluate the use of sedation in DEU in Catalonia.

Material and Method

A questionnaire on the practice of sedation was designed and sent to the heads of medical and nursing staff of the DEU of 63 public and private hospitals in Catalonia. Two mailings were sent with an interval of three months between each. The questionnaire included 62 items on the characteristics of the hospital and the DEU, number of explorations, frequency of sedation use, drugs employed, participation of an anesthesiologist, use of monitoring, and complications.

Results

Forty-four DEU (70%) corresponding to 31 public hospitals and 13 private hospitals completed the questionnaire. Evaluation of sedation patterns was based on 105,904 explorations performed in the various DEU (56,453 gastroscopies, 47,278 colonoscopies and 2,173 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCP) in 2001. Sedation, sedation- analgesia or anesthesia was used in 17% of gastroscopies, 61% of colonoscopies and 100% of ERCP. Sedation was administered by an anesthesiologist in 7% of gastroscopies, 25% of colonoscopies and 38% of ERCP. Anesthesiologist administration was more frequent in private than in public centers (gastroscopies: 25% vs. 2%; colonoscopies: 57% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). No deaths associated with the use of sedation were reported. Eighty-nine percent of the DEU complied with standard recommendations for the practice of sedation.

Conclusions

In Catalonia, the use of sedation is highly variable, depending on the endoscopic procedure and the DEU. Use of sedation in infrequent in gastroscopy, fairly widespread in colonoscopy and routine in ERCP. Anesthesiologist administration is significantly more frequent in private hospitals. Most DEU follow standard sedation practices.

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Biblografía
[1.]
B.B. Scott.
Gastroenterology in the Trent Region in 1992 and a review of changes since 1975.
Gut, 36 (1995), pp. 468-472
[2.]
D.A. Lieberman, C.K. Wuerker, R.M. Katon.
Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation.
Gastroenterology, 88 (1985), pp. 468-472
[3.]
D. Fleischer.
Monitoring for conscious sedation: perspective of the gastrointestinal endoscopist.
Gastrointest Endosc, 36 (1990), pp. S19-S22
[4.]
G.D. Bell.
Premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy [review].
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 4 (1990), pp. 103-122
[5.]
P.B. Cotton, C.B. Williams.
Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy 3rd ed.
[6.]
R. Hart, M. Classen.
Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Endoscopy, 22 (1990), pp. 229-233
[7.]
M. Lazzaroni, G.B. Porro.
Preparation, premedication and surveillance.
Endoscopy, 30 (1998), pp. 53-60
[8.]
D.M. Scott-Coombes, J.N. Thompson.
Hypoxia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is caused by sedation.
Endoscopy, 25 (1993), pp. 308-309
[9.]
A. Zaman, R. Hapke, G. Sahagun, R.M. Katon.
Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Am J Gastroenterol, 93 (1998), pp. 1260-1263
[10.]
F. Froehlich, W. Schwizer, J. Thorens, M. Kohler, J.J. Gonvers, M. Fried.
Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters.
Gastroenterology, 108 (1995), pp. 697-704
[11.]
F. Froehlich, J. Thorens, W. Schwizer, M. Preisig, M. Kohler, R.D. Hays, et al.
Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.
Gastrointest Endosc, 45 (1997), pp. 1-9
[12.]
R. Campo, E. Brullet, A. Montserrat, X. Calvet, J. Moix, M. Rue, et al.
Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11 (1999), pp. 201-204
[13.]
A. Panades, J. Ledesma, J. Belloc, M. Oliver, M. Andreu.
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Knowledge, reluctance and tolerance.
Gastroenterology, 104 (1993), pp. A19
[14.]
N. Abraham, A. Barkun, M. Larocque, C. Fallone, S. Mayrand, V. Baffis, et al.
Predicting which patients can undergo upper endoscopy comfortably without conscious sedation.
Gastrointest Endosc, 56 (2002), pp. 180-189
[15.]
R.J. Mahajan, J.C. Johnson, J.B. Marshall.
Predictors of patient cooperation during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
J Clin Gastroenterol, 24 (1997), pp. 220-223
[16.]
R. Campo, E. Brullet, A. Montserrat, M. Vergara, F. Junquera, X. Calvet.
Factors predicting poor tolerance of colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc, 55 (2002), pp. AB160
[17.]
E.B. Keeffe, K.W. O'Connor.
1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.
Gastrointest Endosc, 36 (1990), pp. S13-S18
[18.]
T.K. Daneshmend, G.D. Bell, R.F. Logan.
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey.
Gut, 32 (1991), pp. 12-15
[19.]
J.M. Raymond, P. Michel, R. Beyssac, E. Capdenat, P. Couzigou, G. Janvier, et al.
Patient's opinion following an upper digestive endoscopy in ambulatory care. Results of a national survey (II).
Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 20 (1996), pp. 570-574
[20.]
F. Froehlich, J.J. Gonvers, M. Fried.
Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.
Endoscopy, 26 (1994), pp. 231-234
[21.]
M.K. Ristikankare, R.J. Julkunen.
Premedication for gastrointestinal endoscopy is a rare practice in Finland: a nationwide survey.
Gastrointest Endosc, 47 (1998), pp. 204-207
[22.]
H.A. Al Atrakchi.
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examinations.
Gastrointest Endosc, 35 (1989), pp. 79-81
[23.]
S. Rana, L.S. Pal.
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: is premedication or topical anesthesia necessary?.
Gastrointest Endosc, 36 (1990), pp. 317-318
[24.]
E. Brullet, J.A. Ramírez-Armengol, R. Campo.
Cleaning and disinfection practices in digestive endoscopy in spain: results of a national survey.
Endoscopy, 33 (2001), pp. 864-868
[25.]
N.C. Fisher, S. Bailey, J.A. Gibson.
A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Endoscopy, 30 (1998), pp. 21-24
[26.]
H.E. Mulcahy, P. Connor.
Declining use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc, 49 (1999), pp. AB199
[27.]
B.T. De Gregorio, J.C. Poorman, R.M. Katon.
Peroral ultrathin endoscopy in adult patients.
Gastrointest Endosc, 45 (1997), pp. 303-306
[28.]
V. Dhir, V.S. Swaroop, K.F. Vazifdar, S.D. Wagle.
Topical pharyngeal anesthesia without intravenous sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Indian J Gastroenterol, 16 (1997), pp. 10-11
[29.]
S.M. Schutz, J.G. Lee, C.M. Schmitt, J. Baillie.
Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc, 40 (1994), pp. 119-120
[30.]
S.A. Solomon, V.K. Kajla, A.K. Banerjee.
Can the elderly tolerate endoscopy without sedation?.
J R Coll Physicians Lond, 28 (1994), pp. 407-410
[31.]
C.C. Tan, J.G. Freeman.
Throat spray for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is quite acceptable to patients.
Endoscopy, 28 (1996), pp. 277-282
[32.]
D.K. Rex, T.F. Imperiale, V. Portish.
Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc, 49 (1999), pp. 554-559
[33.]
F.N. Herman.
Avoidance of sedation during total colonoscopy.
Dis Colon Rectum, 33 (1990), pp. 70-72
[34.]
I. Yoshikawa, H. Honda, K. Nagata, K. Kanda, T. Yamasaki, K. Kume, et al.
Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.
Am J Gastroenterol, 97 (2002), pp. 3052-3055
[35.]
D.S. Early, T. Saifuddin, J.C. Johnson, P.D. King, J.B. Marshall.
Patient attitudes toward undergoing colonoscopy without sedation.
Am J Gastroenterol, 94 (1999), pp. 1862-1865
[36.]
M.S. Mokhashi, R.H. Hawes.
Struggling toward easier endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc, 48 (1998), pp. 432-440
[37.]
T.H. Wang, J.T. Lin.
Worldwide use of sedation and analgesia for upper intestinal endoscopy. Sedation for upper GI endoscopy in Taiwan.
Gastrointest Endosc, 50 (1999), pp. 888-889
[38.]
R. Fasoli, G. Repaci, U. Comin, G. Minoli.
A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Dig Liver Dis, 34 (2002), pp. 833-841
[39.]
D. Grasset, J.J. Morfoisse, C. Seigneuric.
Conditions of practice and results of colonoscopy in non-university hospitals. Results of a cross sectional, multicenter ANGH study.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 24 (2000), pp. 273-278
[40.]
P. Ruszniewski, P. Bernades.
Cost of fibroscopy in gastroduodenal ulcer.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 16 (1992), pp. 837-841
[41.]
G.A. Paspatis, M. Manolaraki, G. Xirouchakis, N. Papanikolaou, G. Chlouverakis, A. Gritzali.
Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study.
Am J Gastroenterol, 97 (2002), pp. 1963-1967
[42.]
R. Campo, E. Brullet, A. Montserrat, M. Vergara, F. Junquera, X. Calvet.
Sedación selectiva en colonoscopia. Un estudio comparativo de meperidina-midazolam frente a propofol-fentanilo.
Gastroenterol Hepatol, 25 (2002), pp. 124
[43.]
K. Raymondos, B. Panning, I. Bachem, M.P. Manns, S. Piepenbrock, P.N. Meier.
Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under conscious sedation and general anesthesia.
Endoscopy, 34 (2002), pp. 721-726
[44.]
D. Kulling, R. Rothenbuhler, W. Inauen.
Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Endoscopy, 35 (2003), pp. 679-682
[45.]
B.W. Sipe, D.K. Rex, D. Latinovich, C. Overley, K. Kinser, L. Bratcher, et al.
Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.
Gastrointest Endosc, 55 (2002), pp. 815-825
[46.]
A.C. Clarke, L.C. Hillman.
Does the use of propofol require a specialist anesthetist?.
Endoscopy, 33 (2001), pp. 95-96
[47.]
F. Gonzalez-Huix, X. Aldeguer, E. Fort, M. Salinas, M. Figa, M. Hombrados, et al.
Sedación sin anestesiólogo en 5.250 casos endoscópicos: midazolam frente a midazolam + dolantina frente a propofol.
Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27 (2004), pp. 183
[48.]
H. Kjaergard, P. Nordkild, J. Geerdsen, V. Dyrberg.
Anaesthesia for colonoscopy. An examination of the anaesthesia as an element of risk at colonoscopy.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 30 (1986), pp. 60-63
[49.]
S. Galandiuk, P. Ahmad.
Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy.
Dig Surg, 15 (1998), pp. 60-63
[50.]
J. Jiménez-Pérez, G. Pastor, R. Aznarez, D. Carral, C. Rodríguez, F. Borda.
Iatrogenic perforation in diagnostic colonoscopy related to the type of sedation.
Gastrointest Endosc, 51 (2000), pp. AB68
Copyright © 2004. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos