covid
Buscar en
Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
Toda la web
Inicio Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa “HERITAGE ASSETS” E INFRAESTRUCTURAS PÚBLICAS: ¿CÓMO, DÓNDE Y POR CUÁNT...
Información de la revista
Vol. 14. Núm. 1.
Páginas 103-116 (enero 2008)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 14. Núm. 1.
Páginas 103-116 (enero 2008)
Open Access
“HERITAGE ASSETS” E INFRAESTRUCTURAS PÚBLICAS: ¿CÓMO, DÓNDE Y POR CUÁNTO?
Visitas
2561
E.J. Buch Gómez, R. Cabaleiro Casal
Universidad de Vigo
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
RESUMEN

Las nuevas filosofías de gestión en el ámbito público, sustentadas en lo que se ha venido denominando la nueva gestión pública, han ido propiciando la incorporación de las técnicas contables tradicionales, nacidas y perfeccionadas para servir las necesidades del sector privado lucrativo. Tal planteamiento supone aplicar a las administraciones públicas el criterio del devengo y la consiguiente necesidad de que la totalidad de los elementos bajo el control de estas entidades sea objeto de valoración y registro para que con ello se pueda evaluar la consecución de unos principios básicos, los de economía y eficiencia, exigibles en la gestión a cualquier entidad publica en los tiempos que corren.

El traslado mimético de unos procedimientos ideados para unas determinadas metas a un ámbito filosóficamente distinto en sus objetivos, logro del mayor bienestar en vez del máximo beneficio, acarrea diversos problemas, entre los que destacan la utilización de unas determinadas categorías de bienes empleadas con unos fines característicos, tales como los de infraestructura o de naturaleza histórica, artística o cultural, cuya presencia contable presenta especiales dificultades.

PALABRAS CLAVE:
Activos fijos públicos
Bienes del patrimonio histórico
artístico y cultural
Infraestructuras
Armonización contable
SUMMARY

The new philosophies of management in the public sphere, supported by what has been called the new public management, have been favouring the incorporation of traditional accounting techniques, sprung and improved to serve the needs of the lucrative private sector. This approach means to apply the accrual basis to public administrations and the subsequent necessity that the totality of the elements under control of these entities be object of valuation and recording so that through this the attainment of basic principles, those of economy and efficiency, demanded nowadays in the management of any public entity can be evaluated.

The mimetic transfer of procedures thought for certain objectives to a sphere philosophically different in its objectives, the attainment of the greatest welfare instead of the highest benefit, results in several problems, among which are highlighted the use of certain categories of goods utilized with characteristic aims, goods such as those of infrastructure or of heritage asset whose accounting presence shows particular difficulties.

KEYWORDS:
Public fixed assets
Heritage Assets
Infrastructure
Accounting Harmonization
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERENCIAS
[ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, ASB, 2006a]
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, ASB (2006a) Discussion Paper, “Heritage assets: can accounting do better”. U.K.
[ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, ASB, 2006b]
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, ASB (2006b) Financial Reporting Exposure Draft “Accounting for Heritage Assets” (FRED 40).
[ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD SUD-AFRICA, ASBS, 2004]
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD SUD-AFRICA, ASBS (2004) Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (GRAP) No 17, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. Sud-África.
[ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD SUD-AFRICA, ASBS, 2005]
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD SUD-AFRICA, ASBS (2005) Discussion Paper, “Heritage Assets” (DP2). Sud-África.
[AIKEN, 1994]
M. AIKEN.
“Parliamentary sovereignty and valuation accruals: uncongenial conventions”.
Financial Accountability and Management, 10 (1994), pp. 17-32
[ANDREW y PITT, 2000]
A. ANDREW, M. PITT.
“Asset valuation of specialised public sector listed buildings by depreciated replacement cost”.
Journal of Property, Investment & Finance, 18 (2000), pp. 627-636
[ANDREW y PITT, 2001]
A. ANDREW, M. PITT.
“The valuation of the site in depreciated replacements cost and contractors basis valuations”.
Property Management, 19 (2001), pp. 298-307
[ANDREW y PITT, 2005]
A. ANDREW, M. PITT.
“Property transfer whitin the Scottish public sector”.
Property Management, 23 (2005), pp. 301-307
[ANDREW y PITT, 2006]
A. ANDREW, M. PITT.
“Property depreciation in Government”.
Property Management, 24 (2006), pp. 259-263
[BARTON, 1999]
A. BARTON.
“A Trusteeship Theory of Accounting for Natural Capital Assets”.
Abacus, 35 (1999), pp. 207-222
[BARTON, 2000]
A. BARTON.
“Accounting for public heritage facilities – assets or liabilities of the government?”.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13 (2000), pp. 219-235
[BARTON, 2005]
A. BARTON.
“The conceptual arguments concernnig accounting for public heritage assets: A note”.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18 (2005), pp. 434-439
[CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF CANADIAN ACCOUNTING, CICA, 2006]
CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF CANADIAN ACCOUNTING, CICA (2006) “Section PS 3150”, Public Sector Handbook Tangible Capital Assets. Canadá.
[CARNEGIE y WOLNIZER, 1995]
G.D. CARNEGIE, P.W. WOLNIZER.
“The financial value of cultural heritage and scientific collections: An accounting fiction”.
Australian Accounting Review, 5 (1995), pp. 31-47
[CARNEGIE y WOLNIZER, 1999]
G.D. CARNEGIE, P.W. WOLNIZER.
“Unravelling the rethoric about the financial reporting of public collections as assets”.
Australian Accounting Review, 9 (1999), pp. 16-21
[CURRIE, 1987]
B. CURRIE.
“Accounting for infrastructure assets”.
Public Finance and Accountancy, May (1987), pp. 7-10
[FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD, FASAB, 1996]
FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD, FASAB (1996) Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) No. 6 “Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment”. USA.
[FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD, FASAB, 1999]
FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD, FASAB (1999) SFFAS No. 16 “Amendments to Accounting For Property, Plant and Equipment-Measurement and Reporting for Multi-Use Heritage Assets- Amending SFFAS 6 and SFFAS 8 Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment, and Supplementary Stewardship Reporting”.
[FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD, FASAB, 2005]
FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD, FASAB (2005) SFFAS 29 “Heritage assets and stewardship land”.
[FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS BOARD, FRSB, 2003]
FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS BOARD, FRSB (2003) Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) No 3 “Accounting for property, plant and equipment”. New Zealand.
[FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS BOARD, FRSB, 2004]
FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS BOARD, FRSB (2004) New Zealand International Accounting Standard (NZ IAS) No 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”.
[GLAZER y JAENICKE, 1991]
A.S. GLAZER, H.R. JAENICKE.
“The Conceptual Framework, Museum Collections, and User-Orientated Financial Statements”.
Accounting Horizons, 5 (1991), pp. 28-43
[HENDRIKSEN, 1982]
E.S. HENDRIKSEN.
Accounting Theory, Richard D. Irwin, (1982),
[HONE, 1997]
P. HONE.
“The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: A public management necessity”.
Australian Accounting Review, 7 (1997), pp. 38-43
[HOOPER et al., 2005]
K. HOOPER, K. KEARINS, R. GREEN.
“Knowing “the price of everything and the value of nothing”: accounting for heritage assets.”.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18 (2005), pp. 410-433
[HUGGINS, 1983]
J. HUGGINS.
“Local Government Could Use Depreciation Accounting”.
Accountants Journal (NZ), 62 (1983), pp. 181-184
[IJIRI, 1975]
Y. IJIRI.
Theory of Accounting Measurement, American Accounting Association, (1975),
[INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IPSASB, 2000]
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IPSASB (2000) International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) No. 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”.
[INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IPSASB, 2001]
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IPSASB (2001) IPSAS No. 17 “Property, Plan and Equipment”.
[INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IPSASB, 2006]
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IPSASB (2006) Consultation Paper “Accounting for Heritage Assets under the Accrual Basis of Accounting”.
[KAY y THOMPSON, 1986]
J.A. KAY, D.J. THOMPSON.
“Privatisation: A Policy in Search of a Rationale”.
The Economic Journal, 96 (1986), pp. 18-32
[LEWIS, 1995]
N.R. LEWIS.
“AAS 29: a critique”.
Readings in Accounting Development in the Public Sector, pp. 16-25
[MAUTZ, 1981]
R.K. MAUTZ.
“Financial Reporting: Should Government Emulate Business?”.
Journal of Accountancy, 152 (1981), pp. 53-60
[Monuments, Mistakes and Opportunities, 1988]
“Monuments, Mistakes and Opportunities”.
Accounting Horizons, June (1988), pp. 123-128
[Not-for-profit Financial Reporting: Another View, 1989]
“Not-for-profit Financial Reporting: Another View”.
Journal of Accountancy, August (1989), pp. 60-67
[MICALLEF y PIERSON, 1997]
F. MICALLEF, G. PIERSON.
“Financial reporting of cultural, heritage and scientific collections”.
Australian Accounting Review, 7 (1997), pp. 31-37
[MICALLEF et al., 1994]
F. MICALLEF, P. SUTCLIFFE, P. DOUGHTY.
Financial Reporting by Government, AARF, (1994),
[MUSGRAVE y MUSGRAVE, 1988]
R.A. MUSGRAVE, P. MUSGRAVE.
Public Finance in Theory and Practice, McGraw Hill, (1988),
[PALLOT, 1987]
J. PALLOT.
“Are public sector assets different?”.
Accountants Journal, May (1987), pp. 41-45
[PALLOT, 1990]
J. PALLOT.
“The Nature of Public Assets: A Response to Mautz”.
Accounting Horizons, June (1990), pp. 79-85
[PALLOT, 1992]
J. PALLOT.
“Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting”.
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5 (1992), pp. 38-59
[PEASNELL, 2005]
PEASNELL, K. (2005) “Institution-specific Value”. Workshop on Accounting Risk Management and Prudential Regulation, Bank of International Settlement, Basel, Switzerland, November 11-12.
[RENTSCHIER y POTTER, 1996]
R. RENTSCHIER, B. POTTER.
“Accountability versus artistic development: the case for nonprofit museums and perfoming arts organizations”.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9 (1996), pp. 100-121
[ROWLES, 1991]
T. ROWLES.
“Infrastructure and heritage asset accounting”.
Australian Accountants, 61 (1991), pp. 69-74
[ROWLES, 1992]
T. ROWLES.
“Financial reporting on infrastructure and heritage assets by public sector entities”.
AARF Discussion Paper. No 17,
[STANTON y STANTON, 1997]
P.J STANTON, P. STANTON.
“Governmental accounting for heritage assets: economic, social implications”.
International Journal of Social Economics, 24 (1997), pp. 988-1006
[VAN DANIKER y KWIATOWSKI, 1986]
VAN DANIKER, R. y KWIATOWSKI, V. (1986) Infrastructure Assets: An Assessment of User Needs and Recommendations for Financial Reporting. Research Report. GASB. USA.
[WALKER et al., 1999]
R.G. WALKER, F.L. CLARKE, G.W. DEAN.
“Reporting on the state of infrastructure by local government”.
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12 (1999), pp. 441-458
[WALKER et al., 2000]
R.G. WALKER, F.L. CLARKE, G.W. DEAN.
“Options of infrastructure reporting”.
Abacus, 36 (2000), pp. 123-158
Copyright © 2008. Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos