Información de la revista
Vol. 44. Núm. 2.
Páginas 46-55 (enero 2001)
Vol. 44. Núm. 2.
Páginas 46-55 (enero 2001)
Acceso a texto completo
Consideraciones éticas sobre la cesárea. Comisión de bioética de la SEGO
Ethical considerations on cesarean sections. Bioethics Committee of the Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Visitas
6480
F. Vergara, F. Abel, D. Álvarez, C. Coll, C. Cuadrado, J. González-Merlo*, J.M. Martínez Pereda, S. Mateu, J. Zamarriego
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
S. Kitzinger.
The experience of chilbirth.
[2.]
B.P. Sachs, J. Yeh, D. Acker.
Cesarean section-related maternal mortality in Massachussetts. 1954-1985.
Obstet Gynecol, 71 (1988), pp. 385-388
[3.]
L. Cabero.
Estrategias para disminuir la tasa de cesáreas. I Congreso virtual Hispanoamericano de Ginecología y Obstetricia, (1999),
[4.]
P.N. Eskew, R.M. Saywell, T.W. Zollinger, et al.
Trends in the frecuency of cesrean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
J Reprod Med, 39 (1994), pp. 808-817
[5.]
A. Guzmán Sánchez, J. González Moreno, M. González Guzmán, et al.
How to reduce the number of cesarean section?.
Ginecol Obstet Mex, 65 (1997), pp. 273-276
[6.]
J. Monleón, J. Monleón Sancho, J. Mínguez Milo, et al.
Estado actual de la cesárea en España. Ponencia XVI Congreso de Medicina Perinatal, pp. 159-162
[7.]
K. O'Driscoll, M. Foley.
Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates.
Obstet Gynecol, 61 (1983), pp. 1-5
[8.]
C. Amiel-Tison.
Cerebral handicap in full-term newborn related to a late pregnancy and/or labor.
Eur J Obst Gynaec Reprod Biol, 28 (1988), pp. 157-166
[9.]
T.K. Eskes.
The perinatal risk: an overview. A discussion of the paper by C. Amiel-Tison.
Eur J Obstet Gynaec Reprod Biol, 28 (1988), pp. 163-166
[10.]
E.J. Hickl.
Rising rates of cesarean sections: maternal and perinatal disventages.
Gynecology and Obstetrics (Proc XI World Congress), pp. 299-305
[11.]
R.D. Burt, T.L. Vaughan, J.R. Daling.
Evaluating the risks of cesarean sections. Low Apgar score in repeated cesarean section and vaginal deliveries.
Am J Publ Health, 17 (1988), pp. 1312-1314
[12.]
M. Garel, N. Lelong, M. Kaminski.
Psychological consecuences of cesarean childbirth in primiparas.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol, 6 (1987), pp. 197-209
[13.]
C. Sargent, N. Stark.
Surgical birth: interpretation of cesarean delivery among private hospital patiens and nursing staff.
Soc Sci Med, 25 (1987), pp. 1269-1276
[14.]
V. Salvatierra.
La Obstetricia en 1990.
La dirección médica del parto, pp. 9-20
[15.]
G.L. Goyert, S.F. Bottoms, M.C. Treadwell, et al.
The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
New England J Med, 320 (1989), pp. 706-709
[16.]
C.M. Fraser.
Selected perinatal procedures. Scientific base for use and psychosocial effects.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, (1983), pp. 117
[17.]
W.N. Spellacy.
Counterpoint. I A viable fetus presenting as a breech in labor needs a cesarean delivery.
Obstet Gynecol Surv, 50 (1995), pp. 761
[18.]
G.S. Berkowitz, G.S. Fiarman, M.A. Mojica, et al.
Effect characteristics on the cesarean birth rate.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 161 (1989), pp. 146-149
[19.]
J.B. Gould, B. Davey, R.S. Stafford.
Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.
N Engl J Med, 321 (1989), pp. 233-239
[20.]
A.J. Herruzo, J.A. Miranda, A. Puertas.
Propuestas para reducir el elevado número de cesáreas. Ponencia obstétrica en el XVI Congreso de Medicina Perinatal.
Cádiz, (1997),
Copyright © 2001. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia