covid
Buscar en
Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Toda la web
Inicio Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología Eficacia de la versión externa previa tocólisis con terbutalina
Información de la revista
Vol. 46. Núm. 11.
Páginas 488-494 (enero 2003)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 46. Núm. 11.
Páginas 488-494 (enero 2003)
Acceso a texto completo
Eficacia de la versión externa previa tocólisis con terbutalina
Efficacy of the external cephalic version with previous tocolysis with terbutaline
Visitas
4675
P. Cavallé i Busquetsa,b, O. Córdoba i Cardonaa,
Autor para correspondencia
octavi@doctoractive.com

Correspondencia: Servei de Ginecologia i Obstetrícia. Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus. Sant Joan, s/n. 43201 Reus. Tarragona. España
, P. Cavallé i Vallverdúa,b
a Servei de Ginecologia i Obstetrícia. Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus. Tarragona
b Departament de Ciències Mèdiques i Quirúrgiques. Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Reus. Tarragona. España
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Objetivo

Determinar la eficacia de la versión externa previa tocólisis con terbutalina en disminuir las presentaciones de nalgas en el momento del parto.

Material y métodos

Estudio prospectivo observacional en gestaciones únicas a término no complicadas, diagnosticadas de presentación de nalgas. No se excluyen cesáreas previas. Tocólisis con terbutalina.

Resultados

Realizamos 43 intentos de versión externa, con un porcentaje de éxito del 55,8% de los casos. Observamos un aumento de la eficacia si se realiza antes de la semana 38 (80%) que a partir de ésta (42,9%), con unas diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,05). No se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el porcentaje de éxito valorando la variedad de nalgas o paridad. No se han observado complicaciones en los 43 intentos.

Conclusiones

La versión externa es un método válido y con baja incidencia de complicaciones para disminuir las presentaciones de nalgas en el momento del parto.

Palabras Clave:
Versión externa
Presentación de nalgas
Tocólisis
Efectos adversos
Cesárea
Summary
Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of the external cephalic version in decreasing the frequency of breech presentations at delivery.

Material and methods

We performed a prospective, observational study in subjects with a single breech fetus at term without clinical complications. External cephalic version attempts were performed with previous tocolysis with terbutaline. Patients who had previously undergone cesarean section were not excluded.

Results

Forty-three external cephalic version attempts were made, of which 55.8% were successful. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in the effectiveness of external cephalic version attempts made before 38 weeks' gestation (80%) compared with attempts made at ≥ 38 weeks (42.9%). No statistically significant differences in the success rate were found between groups in parity or type of breech. No complications were observed in the 43 attempts.

Conclusions

External cephalic version is effective in reducing the number of breech presentations at delivery and has a low complication rate.

Key Words:
External cephalic version
Breech presentation
Tocolysis
Adverse effects
Cesarean section
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
M. Cheng, M. Hannah.
Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature.
Obstet Gynecol, 82 (1993), pp. 605-618
[2.]
R. Al-Muffi, A. McCarthy, M. Fiske, K. Kahn.
A meta-analysis of infant outcomes after breech delivery.
Obstet Gynecol, 85 (1995), pp. 1047-1054
[3.]
M.E. Hannah, W.J. Hannah, S.A. Watson, E.D. Hodnet, S. Saigal, A.R. Willian.
for the term breech Trial Collaborative Group Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial.
Lancet, 356 (2000), pp. 1375-1383
[4.]
J.R. De Miguel, E. De Cabrillo, S. Carrasco, M. Ezqurdia, J. Martínez, J.C. Melchor, et al.
Documentos de consenso. SEGO 2002.
pp. 9-48
[5.]
Practice Committee on Obstetric.
ACOG committee opinion mode of term singleton breech delivery.
Int J Gynecol Obstet, 77 (2002), pp. 65-66
[6.]
P.J. Bradley-Watson.
The decreasing value of external cephalic version in modern obstetric practice.
Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 123 (1975), pp. 237-240
[7.]
J. Kasule, T.H.K. Chimbria, I.M.L. Brown.
Controled trial of external cephalic version.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 92 (1985), pp. 14-18
[8.]
G.J. Hofmeyer.
External cephalic version for breach presentation before term.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (1999),
[9.]
A. Shennan, S. Bewley.
How to manage term breech deliveries.
Bmj, 323 (2001), pp. 244-245
[10.]
R. Varma, D. Horel.
External cephalic version should be routine clinical practice in UK.
Bmj, 324 (2002), pp. 49
[11.]
M. James, K. Hunt, R. Burr, R. Johanson.
A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in UK district general hospital.
BMC Healt Serv Res, 1 (2001), pp. 6
[12.]
E.K. Adams, P.D. Mauldin, J.G. Mauldin, R.M. Mayberry.
Determing cost savings from attempted cephalic version in a inner city delivering population.
Health Care Manag Sci, 3 (2000), pp. 185-192
[13.]
K. Ruangchainikom, C. Chareonporn.
External cephalic version at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital.
J Med Assoc Thai, 84 (2001), pp. 1258-1262
[14.]
M. Giusti, G.C. Bertolotti, R.E. Nppi, A. Fignon, C. Zara.
External cephalic version as possible treatment of breech presentation.
Minerva Ginecol, 52 (2000), pp. 221-227
[15.]
T.G. Theog.
Outcome of 80 cases of external cephalic version.
Med J Malaysia, 51 (1996), pp. 469-474
[16.]
A.L. Regalia, P. Curiel, N. Natale, A. Gallenzi, G. Spinelli, G.V. Ghezzi, et al.
Routine use of external cephalic version in three hospitals.
[17.]
S. Narchis, A.C. Tenore, M. Lovotti, R. Neranti, A. Teatini, C. Belloni.
Eficacy of external cephalic version performed at term.
Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol, 76 (1998), pp. 161-163
[18.]
R. Laros Jr., T. Flanagan, S. Kilpatrick.
Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172 (1995), pp. 1916-1925
[19.]
R. Burr, P. Helyer, S.C. Robson.
A training model for external cephalic version.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 99 (2000), pp. 199-200
[20.]
B.L. Flamm, R.M. Ruffini.
Undetected breech presentation: impact on external version and cesarean rates.
Am J Perinatol, 15 (1998), pp. 287-289
[21.]
M.T. Kornman, K.T. Kimball, K.O. Reeves.
Preterm external cephalic version in a outpatien environment.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172 (1995), pp. 1734-1741
[22.]
P. Acien.
Breech presentation in Spain, 1992: a collaboratori study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 62 (1995), pp. 19-24
[23.]
E.K. Hutton, M.E. Hannah, J. Barrett.
Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of canadian practicioners.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 24 (2002), pp. 804-810
[24.]
T.K. Lau, K.W. Lo, M. Rogers.
Pregnancy outcome after succesful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 176 (1997), pp. 218-223
[25.]
L.Y. Chan, T.Y. Leung, W.Y. Fok, L.W. Chan, T.K. Lau.
High incidence of obstetric interventions after succesful external cephalic version.
Bjog, 109 (2002), pp. 627-631
[26.]
D. Siddiqui, R.J. Stiller, J. Collins, S.A. Laifer.
Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 181 (1999), pp. 1092-1095
[27.]
A.L. Regalia, P. Curiel, N. Natale, A. Galluzi, G. Spinelli, G.V. Ghezzi, et al.
Routine use of external cephalic version in trhee hospitals.
Birth, 27 (2000), pp. 19-24
[28.]
L. Stine, J. Phelan, R. Wallace, G. Eglinton, J.P. Van dorsen, B. Schifrin.
Update on external cephalic version performed at term.
Obstet Gynecol, 65 (1985), pp. 642-646
[29.]
V. Berghella.
Prolapsed cord after external cephalic version in a patient with premature rupture of membranes and transverse lie.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 99 (2001), pp. 274-275
[30.]
J.B. De Meeus, F. Ellia, G. Magnin.
External cephalic version after a previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 81 (1998), pp. 65-68
[31.]
B.L. Flamm, M.W. Fried, N.M. Lonky, W.S. Giles.
External cephalic version after previous cesarean section.
A J Obstet Gynecol, 165 (1991), pp. 370-372
[32.]
M. Schauter, S. Kogan, I. Blickstein.
External cephalic version after previous cesarean section-a clinical dilema.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 45 (1994), pp. 17-20
Copyright © 2003. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos