Social Cognitive Maps. Un método para identificar los grupos sociales en contextos naturales

García Bacete, Francisco Juan; Perrin, Ghislaine Marande

doi:10.5093/in2013a8

Información del artículo

Resumen

Bibliografía

Descargar PDF

Estadísticas

Resumen

En este artículo se describe el Composite Social Cognitive Maps (SCM), un método para identificar grupos de personas en contextos naturales. Se presenta el método, fundamentos, procedimiento de entrevista, utilización del software SCM 4.0 y análisis de la información que éste proporciona. Este software, a pesar de contar con una amplia tradición, es bastante desconocido en contextos de habla española. El método se puede aplicar en diversos ámbitos, pero en el presente trabajo se particulariza al contexto escolar, al aula y a los grupos de alumnos que hay en el aula. EL SCM proporciona información sobre: a) la identidad de los individuos que forman parte de un grupo de iguales y las personas con las que cada individuo está más estrechamente relacionado, b) el número de grupos y la centralidad de cada grupo dentro de la red social (aula) y c) la centralidad de cada individuo dentro del aula. Por último se comentan los resultados obtenidos en estudios que han utilizado este método y se proporciona información sobre su validez, fiabilidad y generalización.

Palabras clave:

Aceptación

Amistad

Centralidad

Grupo de iguales

Red social

Abstract

This article describes the composite Social-Cognitive Map (SCM), a user-friendly method to identify groups of persons in natural settings. The method is introduced, with its foundations, the interview procedure, the use of SCM software 4.0, and the analysis of the information it yields. Despite having a large tradition, this software is quite unknown in Spanish speaking contexts. This method can be applied in various fields, but in this study we focus on the school context, the classroom and the student groups in the classroom. The SCM provides information on: a) the identity of individuals who are members of a peer group and the people with whom each individual is more closely affiliated; b) the number of peer groups and the centrality of each group within the social network (class); and c) the centrality of each individual in the classroom. Finally, the results obtained in studies which applied this method are commented, and information about its validity, reliability and generalization is provided.

Keywords:

Centrality

Friendship

Peer groups

Social acceptance

Social network

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF

Referencias

[Adler and Adler, 1998]

P.A. Adler, P. Adler.

Peer Power: Preadolescent culture and identity.

Rutgers University Press, (1998),

[Asher et al., 1996]

S. Asher, J. Parker, D. Walker.

Distinguishing friendship from acceptance: Implications for intervention and assessment.

The company they keep: Friendships in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development, pp. 336-405

[Cairns et al., 1988]

R.B. Cairns, B.D. Cairns, H.J. Neckerman, S. Gest, J.L. Gariepy.

Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection?.

Developmental Psychology, 24 (1988), pp. 815-823

[Cairns et al., 1996]

Cairns, R.B., Gariepy, J.L., Kinderman, T. y Leung, M.C. (1996). Identifying social clusters in natural settings. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

[Cairns et al., 1995]

R.B. Cairns, M.C. Leung, L. Buchanan, B.D. Cairns.

Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence, Fluidity, reliability, and interrelations.

Child Development, 66 (1995), pp. 1330-1345

Medline

[Cairns et al., 1985]

R.B. Cairns, J.E. Perrin, B.D. Cairns.

Social structure and social cognition in early adolescence: Affiliative patterns.

Journal of Early Adolescence, 5 (1985), pp. 339-355

[Cairns et al., 1998]

R.B. Cairns, H. Xie, M. Leung.

The popularity of friendship and the neglect of social networks: Toward a new balance.

Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group: No. 80. New directions for child development, pp. 5-24

[Chung-Hall and Chen, 2010]

J. Chung-Hall, X. Chen.

Aggressive and prosocial peer group functioning: Effects on children's social, school, and psychological adjustment.

Social Development, 19 (2010), pp. 659-680

[Cillessen, 2008]

A.H.N. Cillessen.

Sociometric methods.

Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups, pp. 82-99

[Cillessen and Mayeux, 2004]

A.H.N. Cillessen, L. Mayeux.

From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status.

Child Development, 75 (2004), pp. 147-163

Medline

[Coie and Dodge, 1988]

J.D. Coie, K.A. Dodge.

Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year perspective.

Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 29 (1988), pp. 261-281

[Ellis and Zarbatany, 2007]

W.E. Ellis, L. Zarbatany.

Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children's deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior.

Child Development, 78 (2007), pp. 1240-1254

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01063.x | Medline

[García-Bacete and González, 2010]

F.J. García-Bacete, J. González.

Evaluación de la competencia social entre iguales.

TEA Ediciones, (2010),

[García-Bacete et al., 2010]

F.J. García-Bacete, I. Sureda, M.I. Monjas.

El rechazo entre iguales en la educación primaria: una panorámica general.

Anales de Psicología, 26 (2010), pp. 123-136

[Gest et al., 2001]

S.D. Gest, S.A. Graham-Bermann, W.W. Hartup.

Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status.

Social Development, 10 (2001), pp. 23-40

[Gifford-Smith and Brownell, 2003]

M.E. Gifford-Smith, C.A. Brownell.

Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships and peer networks.

Journal of School Psychology, 41 (2003), pp. 235-284

[Glick and Rose, 2011]

G.C. Glick, A.J. Rose.

Prospective associations between friendship adjustment and social strategies: Friendship as a context for building social skills.

Developmental Psychology, 47 (2011), pp. 1117-1132

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023277 | Medline

[Grupo GREI, 2008]

Grupo GREI.

SCM, Mapa Cognitivo Social. Protocolo y hoja de respuesta.

Material no publicado, (2008),

[Hinde and Stevenson-Hinde, 1987]

R.A. Hinde, J. Stevenson-Hinde.

Interpersonal relationships and child development.

Developmental Review, 7 (1987), pp. 1-21

[Hitti et al., 2011]

A. Hitti, K.L. Mulvey, M. Killen.

Social exclusion and culture: The role of group norms, group identity and fairness.

Anales de Psicología, 27 (2011), pp. 587-599

[Hodges and Card, 2003]

Enemies and the darker side of peer relations,

[Hymel et al., 1993]

S. Hymel, A. Bowker, E. Woody.

Aggressive vs. withdrawn unpopular children: Peer- and selfperceptions across multiple domains.

Child Development, 64 (1993), pp. 879-896

Medline

[Jones and Estell, 2010]

M.H. Jones, D.B. Estell.

When elementary students change peer groups: intragroup centrality, intergroup centrality, and self-Perceptions of popularity.

Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 56 (2010), pp. 164-188

[Kinderman, 1993]

T.A. Kinderman.

Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school.

Developmental Psychology, 29 (1993), pp. 970-977

[Kwon et al., 2011]

K.A. Kwon, M.A. Lease, L. Hoffman.

The Impact of Clique Membership on Children's Social Behavior and Status Nominations.

Social Development, 21 (2011), pp. 150-169

[Monjas et al., 2008]

M.I. Monjas, I. Sureda, F.J. García Bacete.

¿Por qué los niños y las niñas se aceptan y se rechazan?.

Cultura y Educación, 20 (2008), pp. 479-492

[Neckerman, 1996]

H.J. Neckerman.

The stability of social groups in childhood and adolescence: The role of the classroom social environment.

Social Development, 5 (1996), pp. 131-145

[Nesdale, 2011]

D. Nesdale.

Social groups and children's intergroup prejudice: Just how influential are social group norms?.

Anales de Psicología, 27 (2011), pp. 600-610

[Rubin et al., 2009]

K.H. Rubin, W.M. Bukowski, B. Laursen.

Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups.

Guilford, (2009),

[Schneider, 2000]

B. Schneider.

Friends and enemies: Peer relations in childhood.

Arnold, (2000),

[Seo and Huang, 2012]

D.C. Seo, Y. Huang.

Systematic review of social network analysis in adolescent cigarette smoking behavior.

Journal of School Health, 82 (2012), pp. 21-27

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00663.x | Medline

[Xie et al., 2001]

H. Xie, B.D. Cairns, R.B. Cairns.

Predicting teen motherhood and teen fatherhood: Individual characteristics and peer affiliations.

Social Development, 10 (2001), pp. 488-509

Síguenos:

Suscríbase a la newsletter