covid
Buscar en
Psychosocial Intervention
Toda la web
Inicio Psychosocial Intervention Social Support and Personal Agency in At-Risk Mothers
Información de la revista
Vol. 20. Núm. 1.
Páginas 13-24 (abril 2011)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Spanish PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 20. Núm. 1.
Páginas 13-24 (abril 2011)
Open Access
Social Support and Personal Agency in At-Risk Mothers
Apoyo Social y Agencia Personal en Madres en Situación de Riesgo
Visitas
4867
María José Rodrigo
Autor para correspondencia
mjrodri@ull.es

Faculty of Psychology. Campus of Guajara. University of La Laguna. La Laguna. Tenerife, Spain.
, Sonia Byrne
Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Abstract

This study investigated: a) mothers’ use and satisfaction with informal and formal supports in at-risk psychosocial contexts, and b) the relationships between satisfaction with help and the mothers’ perception of their role (personal agency). Self-report data about the use and satisfaction with sources of help, and levels of internal control, self-efficacy, couple agreement, role difficulty and motivation for change were obtained from 519 mothers referred by Social Services and 519 non-referred mothers. Results indicated that at-risk mothers relied less upon close informal support and more on formal support than non atrisk mothers. They were also more satisfied with the formal sources of support and had lower levels of personal agency. There were beneficial effects of satisfaction with informal help and school support on several aspects of personal agency for both groups. However, satisfaction with school and social services support had a detrimental effect on couple agreement in the at-risk group. Implications of the results for providing social support to at-risk families are discussed.

Keywords:
at-risk families
informal and formal use and source satisfaction
personal agency
social support
Resumen

El presente estudio investiga: a) el uso y la satisfacción con las fuentes de apoyo informal y formal de las madres en contextos de riesgo psicosocial y b) la relación existente entre la satisfacción con el apoyo social y la percepción del rol parental (agencia personal). Se obtuvieron datos con respecto al uso y la satisfacción con las fuentes de apoyo social, así como los niveles de control interno, autoeficacia, acuerdo en la pareja, dificultad del rol y motivación para el cambio, de 519 madres referidas por los Servicios Sociales y 519 madres no referidas. Los resultados indicaron que las madres en situación de riesgo psicosocial dependen menos de los apoyos informales y más de los formales que las madres en situación de no riesgo. Asimismo las madres en riesgo se encontraban más satisfechas con las fuentes de apoyo formal y presentaban niveles más bajos de agencia personal. Se obtuvieron efectos beneficiosos de la satisfacción con las fuentes informales de apoyo y el apoyo de la escuela en diversos aspectos de la agencia personal en ambos grupos. Sin embargo, la satisfacción con el apoyo proporcionado por la escuela y los servicios sociales tuvieron un efecto perjudicial en el acuerdo en la pareja en el grupo en situación de riesgo psicosocial. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados con respecto a la provisión de apoyo social en las familias en situación de riesgo psicosocial.

Palabras clave:
agencia personal
apoyo social
familias en riesgo
uso y satisfacción con el apoyo informal y formal
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[Ardelt and Eccles, 2001]
M. Ardelt, J.S. Eccles.
Effects of mothers’ parental efficacy beliefs and promotive parenting strategies on inner-city youth.
Journal of Family Issues, 22 (2001), pp. 944-972
[Azar, 1998]
S.T. Azar.
Parenting and child maltreatment.
5th, pp. 361-388
[Bandura, 1982]
A. Bandura.
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.
American Psychologist, 37 (1982), pp. 122-147
[Bandura, 1997]
A. Bandura.
Social learning theory.
Prentice Hall, (1997),
[Beach et al., 1996]
S.R. Beach, F.D. Fincham, J. Katz, T. Bradbury.
Social support in marriage: A cognitive perspective.
Handbook of social support and the family, pp. 43-66
[Bolger et al., 2000]
N. Bolger, A. Zuckerman, R.C. Kessler.
Invisible support and adjustment to stress.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (2000), pp. 953-961
[Ceballo and McLoyd, 2002]
R. Ceballo, V.C. McLoyd.
Social support and parenting in poor, dangerous neighbourhoods.
Child Development, 73 (2002), pp. 1310-1321
[Cochran and Niego, 1995]
M. Cochran, S. Niego.
Parenting and Social Networks.
Handbook of parenting, Volume 3: Status and social conditions of parenting, pp. 393-418
[Cohen and Wills, 1985]
S. Cohen, T. Wills.
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.
Psychological Bulletin, 98 (1985), pp. 310-357
[Coleman and Karraker, 1997]
P.K. Coleman, K.H. Karraker.
Self-efficacy and parenting quality: Findings and future applications.
Developmental Review, 18 (1997), pp. 47-85
[Collins and Feeney, 2000]
N.L. Collins, B.C. Feeney.
A safe heaven: An attachment theory perspective on support-seeking caregiving in intimate relationships.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (2000), pp. 1053-1073
[Corse et al., 1990]
S.J. Corse, K. Schmid, P.K. Trickett.
Social network characteristics of mothers in abusing and nonabusing families and their relationships to parenting beliefs.
Journal of Community Psychology, 18 (1990), pp. 44-59
[Cutrona, 1996]
C.E. Cutrona.
Social support as determinant of marital quality: The interplay of negative and supportive behaviours.
Handbook of social support and the family, pp. 173-194
[Doherty and Beaton, 2000]
W. Doherty, J. Beaton.
Family therapists, community, and civic renewal.
Family Process, 39 (2000), pp. 149-161
[Donovan and Leavitt, 1989]
W.L. Donovan, L.A. Leavitt.
Maternal self-efficacy and infant attachment: Integrating physiology, perception and behavior.
Child Development, 60 (1989), pp. 460-472
[Elder et al., 1995]
G.H. Elder, J.S. Eccles, M. Ardelt, S. Lord.
Inner-city parents under economic pressure: Perspectives on the strategies of parenting.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57 (1995), pp. 771-784
[Evans and Harris, 2004]
T. Evans, J. Harris.
Citizenship, social inclusion and confidentiality.
British Journal of Social Work, 34 (2004), pp. 69-91
[Folkman and Lazarus, 1988]
S. Folkman, R.S. Lazarus.
Coping as a mediator of emotion.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (1988), pp. 150-170
[Garbarino and Kostelny, 1992]
J. Garbarino, K. Kostelny.
Child maltreatment as a community problem.
Child Abuse & Neglect, 16 (1992), pp. 455-464
[Ghate and Hazel, 2002]
D. Ghate, N. Hazel.
Parenting in poor environments. Stress support and coping.
Jessica Kingsley, (2002),
[Gottlieb, 1983]
B.H. Gottlieb.
Social support strategies: Guidelines for mental health practice.
Sage, (1983),
[Gottlieb, 2000]
B.H. Gottlieb.
Selecting and planning support interventions.
Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists, pp. 195-220
[Gracia et al., 2002]
E. Gracia, J. Herrero, G. Musitu.
Evaluación de estresores psicosociales en la comunidad.
Síntesis, (2002),
[Jack, 2000]
G. Jack.
Ecological influences on parenting and child development.
British Journal of Social Work, 30 (2000), pp. 703-720
[Jones and Prinz, 2005]
T.L. Jones, R.J. Prinz.
Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review.
Clinical Psychology Review, 25 (2005), pp. 341-363
[Koeske and Koeske, 1992]
G.F. Koeske, R.D. Koeske.
Parenting locus of control: Measurement, construct validation, and a proposed conceptual model.
Social Work Research and Abstracts, 28 (1992), pp. 37-46
[Lin and Ensel, 1989]
N. Lin, W.M. Ensel.
Life stress and health: Stressors and resources.
American Sociological Review, 54 (1989), pp. 382-399
[Littell and Girvin, 2005]
J.H. Littell, H. Girvin.
Caregivers’ readiness for change: predictive validity in a child welfare sample.
Child Abuse & Neglect, 29 (2005), pp. 59-80
[Máiquez et al., 2000]
M.L. Máiquez, M.J. Rodrigo, C. Capote, I. Vermaes.
Aprender en la vida cotidiana: un programa experiencial para padres.
Visor, (2000),
[Matos and Sousa, 2004]
A.R. Matos, L.M. Sousa.
How multiproblem families try to find support in Social Services.
Journal of Social Work Practice, 18 (2004), pp. 65-80
[McHale and Cowan, 1996]
J.P. McHale, P.A. Cowan.
Understanding how family-level dynamics affects children's development: Studies of two-parent families.
Jossey-Bass, (1996),
[McLoyd et al., 1994]
V.C. McLoyd, T.E. Jayaratne, R. Ceballo, J. Borquez.
Unemployment and work interruption among African-American single mothers: Effects on parenting and adolescent socioemotional functioning.
Child Development, 65 (1994), pp. 562-589
[Melson et al., 1993]
G.F. Melson, G.W. Ladd, H.C. Hsu.
Maternal support networks, maternal cognitions, and young children's social and cognitive development.
Child Development, 64 (1993), pp. 1401-1417
[Pierce et al., 1996]
G.R. Pierce, I.G. Sarason, B.R. Sarason.
The role of social support in coping.
Handbook of coping: Theory, research, and applications, pp. 434-451
[Raver and Leadbeater, 1999]
C.C. Raver, B.J. Leadbeater.
Mothering under pressure: Environmental, child and dyadic correlates of maternal self-efficacy among low-income women.
Journal of Family Psychology, 13 (1999), pp. 523-534
[Rodrigo et al., 2006]
M.J. Rodrigo, A.D. Correa, M.L. Máiquez, J.C. Martín, G. Rodríguez.
Family preservation services on the Canary Islands: Predictors of the efficacy of a parenting program for families at-risk of social exclusion.
European Psychologist, 11 (2006), pp. 57-70
[Rodrigo et al., 2007]
M.J. Rodrigo, J.C. Martín, M.L. Máiquez, G. Rodríguez.
Informal and formal supports and maternal child-rearing practices in at-risk and non at-risk psychosocial contexts.
Children and Youth Services Review, 29 (2007), pp. 329-347
[Rodríguez et al., 2006]
G. Rodríguez, J. Camacho, M.J. Rodrigo, J.C. Martín, M.L. Máiquez.
La evaluación del riesgo psicosocial en las familias usuarias de los servicios sociales municipales.
Psicothema, 18 (2006), pp. 200-206
[Sarason et al., 1983]
I.G. Sarason, H.M. Levine, R.B. Basham, B.R. Sarason.
Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1983), pp. 127-139
[Schwarzer and Knoll, 2007]
R. Schwarzer, N. Knoll.
Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview.
International Journal of Psychology, 42 (2007), pp. 243-252
[Shumaker and Brownell, 1984]
S.A. Shumaker, A. Brownell.
Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps.
Journal of Social Issues, 40 (1984), pp. 11-36
[Turner and Roszell, 1994]
R.J. Turner, P. Roszell.
Personal resources and the stress process.
Stress and mental health: Contemporary issues and prospects for the future, pp. 179-210
[Wills and Shinar, 2000]
T.A. Wills, O. Shinar.
Measuring perceived and received social support.
Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists, pp. 86-135
[Woodcock, 2003]
J. Woodcock.
The social work assessment of parenting: An exploration.
British Journal of Social Work, 33 (2003), pp. 87-106

Versión en castellano disponible en [Spanish version available at]: www.psychosocial-intervention.org

Copyright © 2011. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo