covid
Buscar en
Psychosocial Intervention
Toda la web
Inicio Psychosocial Intervention Efecto de supresión y mediación en el contexto de la intervención psicosocial...
Información de la revista
Vol. 22. Núm. 1.
Páginas 55-59 (abril 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 22. Núm. 1.
Páginas 55-59 (abril 2013)
Open Access
Efecto de supresión y mediación en el contexto de la intervención psicosocial: Diferencias, similitudes y ejemplos
Suppression and mediation effect in psychosocial intervention: Differences, similarities and examples
Visitas
5889
Sergio Murguia, Teresa I. Jiménezb
a Departamento de Psicología Social, Universitat de València, España
b Departamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza, España
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen

El presente trabajo compara el efecto mediador y el supresor de una tercera variable. Ambos efectos parcelan la varianza de la variable dependiente (Y). La mediación es la reducción, tras introducir una tercera variable (Z) en el modelo, de la proporción de varianza explicada directamente por la variable independiente (X) en la variable criterio (Y) y la supresión es el incremento de la proporción de varianza explicada directamente por la independiente en la variable criterio, al incluir la tercera variable en el modelo. Se analizan las características y diferencias de cada efecto y se examina en qué situaciones se produce uno u otro. Cada situación, compuesta de tres variables correlacionadas entre sí, se explica con un ejemplo en el contexto de la intervención psicosocial. Finalmente, se proporcionan recomendaciones sobre la interpretación y utilización de ambos efectos.

Palabras clave:
Mediación
Supresión
Terceras variables
Intervención psicosocial
Investigación psicosocial
Abstract

This paper compares the mediator and suppressor effect of a third variable. Both effects split the variance of the dependent variable (Y). Mediation is the reduction, after introducing the third variable (Z) in the model, of the proportion of variance explained on variable Y directly by the independent variable (X), and suppression is the increase of the of the proportion of variance explained on variable Y directly by the independent variable after introducing the third variable in the model. Then, the characteristics and differences of each effect are analyzed and the situations in which either effect occurs are examined. Each situation, consisting of three intercorrelated variables, is explained with examples from the psychosocial intervention context. Finally, recommendations for the use and interpretation of both effects are provided.

Keywords:
Mediator effect
Suppressor effect
Third variables
Psychosocial intervention
Psychosocial research
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Referencias
[Ato and Vallejo, 2011]
M. Ato, G. Vallejo.
Los efectos de terceras variables en la investigación psicológica.
Anales de Psicología, 27 (2011), pp. 550-561
[Baron and Kenny, 1986]
R.M. Baron, D.A. Kenny.
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (1986), pp. 1173-1182
[Bennett-Cattaneo, 2010]
L. Bennett-Cattaneo.
The role of socioeconomic status in interactions with police among a national sample of women experiencing intimate partner violence.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 45 (2010), pp. 247-258
[Cheung and Lau, 2008]
G.W. Cheung, R.S. Lau.
Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models.
Organizational Research Methods, 11 (2008), pp. 296-325
[Cohen et al., 2003]
J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S.G. West, L.S. Aiken.
Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.
3rd, Lawrence Erlbaum, (2003),
[Colder et al., 2000]
C.R. Colder, J. Mott, S. Levy, B. Flay.
The relation of perceived neighborhood danger to childhood aggression: A test of mediating mechanism.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 28 (2000), pp. 83-103
[Conger, 1974]
A.J. Conger.
A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34 (1974), pp. 35-46
[Eng et al., 2009]
S. Eng, M. Mulsow, H. Cleveland, S.L. Hart.
Academic achievement among adolescents in Cambodia: Does caregiver trauma matter?.
Journal of Community Psychology, 37 (2009), pp. 754-768
[Frazier et al., 2004]
P.A. Frazier, A.P. Tix, K.E. Barron.
Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51 (2004), pp. 115-134
[Fuentes et al., 2011a]
M.C. Fuentes, J.F. García, E. Gracia, M. Lila.
Self-concept and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence.
Psicothema, 23 (2011), pp. 7-12
[Fuentes et al., 2011b]
M.C. Fuentes, J.F. García, E. Gracia, M. Lila.
Self-concept and drug use in adolescence.
Adicciones, 23 (2011), pp. 237-248
[Gámez-Guadix and Almendros, 2011]
M. Gámez-Guadix, C. Almendros.
Exposición a la violencia entre los padres, prácticas de crianza y malestar psicológico a largo plazo de los hijos [Witnessing interparental violence, parenting practices, and children's long-term psychological distress].
Psychosocial Intervention, 20 (2011), pp. 121-130
[Gracia and Herrero, 2006]
E. Gracia, J. Herrero.
La comunidad como fuente de apoyo social: Evaluación e implicaciones en los ámbitos individual y comunitario.
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38 (2006), pp. 327-342
[Herrero and Gracia, 2007]
J. Herrero, E. Gracia.
Measuring perceived community support: Factorial structure, longitudinal invariance, and predictive validity of the PESQ (perceived community support questionnaire).
Journal of Community Psychology, 35 (2007), pp. 197-217
[Holmbeck, 1997]
G.N. Holmbeck.
Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65 (1997), pp. 599-610
[Horst, 1941]
P. Horst.
Social Science Research Council, (1941),
[Hyman, 1955]
H. Hyman.
Survey design and analysis: Principles, cases and procedures.
Glencoe, (1955),
[Jiménez, 2011]
T.I. Jiménez.
Autoestima de riesgo y protección: una mediación entre el clima familiar y el consumo de sustancias en adolescentes [Risk and protective selfesteem: a mediational role between family environment and substance use in adolescents].
Psychosocial Intervention, 20 (2011), pp. 53-61
[Jiménez et al., 2007]
T.I. Jiménez, S. Murgui, E. Estévez, G. Musitu.
Comunicación familiar y comportamientos delictivos en adolescentes españoles: El doble rol de la autoestima.
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 39 (2007), pp. 473-485
[Jiménez et al., 2005]
T.I. Jiménez, G. Musitu, S. Murgui.
Familia, apoyo social y conducta delictiva en la adolescencia: Efectos directos y mediadores.
Anuario de Psicología, 36 (2005), pp. 181-196
[Jiménez et al., 2008]
T.I. Jiménez, G. Musitu, S. Murgui.
Funcionamiento familiar, autoestima y consumo de sustancias: un modelo de mediación.
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8 (2008), pp. 139-151
[Jiménez et al., 2009]
T.I. Jiménez, G. Musitu, M.J. Ramos, S. Murgui.
Community involvement and victimization at school: An analysis through family, personal and social adjustment.
Journal of Community Psychology, 37 (2009), pp. 959-974
[Kasser and Ryan, 1993]
T. Kasser, R.M. Ryan.
A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (1993), pp. 410-422
[Maassen and Bakker, 2001]
G.H. Maassen, A.B. Bakker.
Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations.
Sociological Methods & Research, 30 (2001), pp. 241-270
[MacCallum et al., 1993]
R.C. MacCallum, D.T. Wegener, B.N. Uchino, L.R. Fabrigar.
The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis.
Psychological Bulletin, 114 (1993), pp. 185-199
[MacKinnon et al., 2000]
D.P. MacKinnon, J.L. Krull, C.M. Lockwood.
Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect.
Prevention Science, 1 (2000), pp. 173-181
[MacKinnon et al., 2002]
D.P. MacKinnon, C.M. Lockwood, J.M. Hoffman, S.G. West, V. Sheets.
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.
Psychological Methods, 7 (2002), pp. 83-104
[Mathieu et al., 2008]
J.E. Mathieu, R.P. DeShon, D.D. Bergh.
Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond.
Organizational Research Methods, 11 (2008), pp. 203-223
[Muller et al., 2005]
D. Muller, C.M. Judd, V.Y. Yzerbyt.
When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (2005), pp. 852-863
[Murgui, 2013]
S. Murgui.
El efecto de terceras variables: Mediación vs. supresión [The effect of third variables: mediation vs. suppression].
Manuscrito enviado para su publicación, (2013),
[Murgui and Fuentes, 2012]
S. Murgui, M.C. Fuentes.
Supresión, supresión clásica y mediación: comparación de perspectivas de análisis.
Libro de Actas del XII Congreso de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales y de la Salud, pp. 345-351
[Nickerson, 2008]
C. Nickerson.
Mutual suppression: Comment on Paulhus et al (2004).
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43 (2008), pp. 556-563
[Oliver et al., 1999]
A. Oliver, J.M. Tomás, P.M. Hontangas, A. Cheyne, S.J. Cox.
Efectos del error de medida aleatorio en modelos de ecuaciones estructurales con y sin variables latentes.
Psicológica, 20 (1999), pp. 41-55
[Paulhus et al., 2004]
D.L. Paulhus, R.W. Robins, K.H. Trzesniewski, J.L. Tracy.
Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research.
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39 (2004), pp. 303-328
[Prado and Pantin, 2011]
G. Prado, H. Pantin.
Reducing substance use and HIV health disparities among Hispanic youth in the USA: The Familias Unidas program of research.
Psychosocial Intervention, 20 (2011), pp. 63-73
[Rynes and Tosigan, 2012]
K.N. Rynes, J.S. Tosigan.
Do social networks explain 12-step sponsorship effects? A prospective lagged mediation analysis.
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26 (2012), pp. 432-439
[Sánchez-Sosa et al., 2010]
J.C. Sánchez-Sosa, M.E. Villarreal-González, G. Musitu, B. Martínez.
Ideación suicida en adolescentes: un análisis psicosocial [Suicidal ideation among adolescents: A psychosocial analysis].
Psychosocial Intervention, 20 (2010), pp. 279-287
[Stone-Romero and Rosopa, 2004]
E.F. Stone-Romero, P. Rosopa.
Inference problems with hierarchical multiple regression-based tests of mediating effects.
pp. 249-290
[Shrout and Bolger, 2002]
P.E. Shrout, N. Bolger.
Mediation in Experimental and non-experimental Studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Psychological Methods, 7 (2002), pp. 422-445
[Tzelgov and Stern, 1978]
J. Tzelgov, I. Stern.
Relationship between variables in three variable linear regression and the concept of suppressor.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38 (1978), pp. 325-335
[Velicer, 1978]
W.F. Velicer.
Suppressor variables and the semipartial correlation coefficient.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38 (1978), pp. 953-958
[Vezzali and Giovanni, 2012]
L. Vezzali, D. Giovanni.
Secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact: The role of intergroup attitudes, intergroup anxiety and perspective taking.
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22 (2012), pp. 125-144
[Villarreal-González et al., 2011]
M.E. Villarreal-González, J.C. Sánchez-Sosa, F.H. Veiga, G. Del Moral Arroyo.
Contextos de desarrollo, malestar psicológico, autoestima social y violencia escolar desde una perspectiva de género en adolescentes mexicanos [Development contexts, psychological distress, social self-esteem and school violence from a gender perspective in Mexican adolescents.
Psychosocial Intervention, 20 (2011), pp. 171-181
[Zhao et al., 2010]
X. Zhao, J.G. Lynch, Q. Chen.
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis.
Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2010), pp. 197-206
Copyright © 2013. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo