covid
Buscar en
Revista de Administração e Inovação
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Administração e Inovação Gamers inovadores e comprometidos: relações entre personalidade do consumidor,...
Información de la revista
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Open Access
Gamers inovadores e comprometidos: relações entre personalidade do consumidor, seu comprometimento com a marca e sua propensão a colaborar em processos de inovação
Games Innovative and Committed: Between Consumer Affairs Personality, its Commitment to the Brand and its Propensity to Collaborate in Innovation Processes
Visitas
873
Cristine Prates Miranda Correa
(Brasil)
Thays Martins do Nascimento
Bacharel em Administração de Empresas pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS, (Brasil)
Tito Luciano Hermes Grillo
Mestre em Administração e Negócios pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS, (Brasil)
Cláudio Damacena
Doutor em Ciências Econômicas e Empresariais pela Universidade de Córdoba – Espanha, Professor da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS, (Brasil)
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Recibido 05 Septiembre 2014. Aceptado 12 Octubre 2015
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
RESUMO

Pesquisadores e gestores têm se deparado com desafios para prever o envolvimento efetivo dos consumidores em processos de inovação, uma vez que participar desses processos implica certos custos de recurso e esforço da parte do consumidor. Nesta pesquisa, voltamos nossa atenção para antecedentes da propensão do consumidor a colaborar em processos de desenvolvimento com a organização. Primeiramente, testamos a relação direta da orientação para a inovação do consumidor e a propensão a colaborar nos processos de desenvolvimento de produto. Subsequentemente, avaliamos se esta relação pode ser mediada pelo comprometimento com a marca. Realizamos um survey com entusiastas de jogos da Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. e analisamos os dados por meio de equações estruturais. Evidenciamos que o comprometimento exerce mediação parcial no modelo.

Palavras-chave:
Desenvolvimento de novos produtos
Cocriação
Comprometimento
Partial least squares
Mediação
ABSTRACT

Researchers and practitioners face challenges to predict effective customer involvement in innovation processes because the participation on these processes imply certain costs of resources and efforts from the customers. In the present research, we draw attention towards antecedents of customer propensity to collaborate in product development with the organization. First, we tested a direct relation between customer innovation orientation and propensity to collaborate in development processes. Subsequently, we assessed whether this relation can be mediated by commitment with the brand. We conducted a survey with enthusiasts of Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and analyzed the data using structural equations. We evidenced that commitment has a partial mediation effect.

Keywords:
New product development
Cocreation
Commitment
Partial least squares
Mediation
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERÊNCIAS
[Alam, 2007]
I. Alam.
An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (2007), pp. 250-261
[Alam and Perry, 2002]
I. Alam, C. Perry.
A customer-oriented new service development process.
Journal of services Marketing, 16 (2002), pp. 515-534
[Bansal et al., 2004]
H.S. Bansal, P.G. Irving, S.F. Taylor.
A three-component model of customer to service providers.
Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 32 (2004), pp. 234-250
[Bettencourt, 1997]
L.A. Bettencourt.
Customer voluntary performance: customers as partners in service delivery.
Journal of retailing, 73 (1997), pp. 383-406
[Bolton and Saxena-Iyer, 2009]
R.N. Bolton, S. Saxena-Iyer.
Interactive services: a framework, synthesis and research directions.
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (2009), pp. 91-104
[Borman and Motowidlo, 1993]
W.C. Borman, S.J. Motowidlo.
Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance.
Personnel selection in organizations, 71 (1993), pp. 98
[Bove et al., 2009]
L.L. Bove, S.J. Pervan, S.E. Beatty, E. Shiu.
Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors.
Journal of Business Research, 62 (2009), pp. 698-705
[Bowen, 1985]
D.E. Bowen.
Schneider, Benjamin, Boundary-spanning Role Employees and the Service Encounter: Some Guidelines for Management and Research.
The Service Encounter, pp. 127-147
[Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995]
S.L. Brown, K.M. Eisenhardt.
Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions.
Academy of Management Review, 20 (1995), pp. 343-378
[Burgess and Steenkamp, 2006]
S.M. Burgess, J.E. Steenkamp.
Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice.
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (2006), pp. 337-356
[Cacioppo et al., 1984]
J.T. Cacioppo, P.E. Richard, F.K. Chuan.
The efficient assessment of need for cognition.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 48 (1984), pp. 306-307
[Cohen, 1988]
J. Cohen.
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencies, Routledge, (1988),
[DeVellis, 2003]
R.F. DeVellis.
Scale Development: Theory and application, 2 ed., Sage Publication, (2003),
[Dillon et al., 1994]
W.R. Dillon, T.J. Madden, N.H. Firtle.
Marketing Research in a Marketing Environment, Times Mirror, (1994),
[Etgar, 2008]
M. Etgar.
A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Scienc, 36 (2008), pp. 97-108
[Fornell and Bookstein, 1982]
C. Fornell, F.L. Bookstein.
Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory.
Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (1982), pp. 440-452
[Fornell and Larcker, 1981]
C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker.
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Journal of marketing resear, 18 (1981), pp. 39-50
[Fournier, 1998]
S. Fournier.
Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research.
Journal of consumer research, 24 (1998), pp. 343-353
[Goldsmith, 1984]
R.E. Goldsmith.
Personality characteristics associated with adaption-innovation.
The Journal of psychology, 117 (1984), pp. 159-165
[Grillo et al., 2014]
T.L.H. Grillo, C.P.M. Correa, C. Damacena.
Measuring Customer Willingness to Collaborate in NPD and its Relation with Customer Engagement.
[Grönroos, 2008]
C. Grönroos.
Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates?.
European Business Review, 20 (2008), pp. 298-314
[Groth, 2005]
M. Groth.
Customers as good soldiers: Examining citizenship behaviors in internet service deliveries.
Journal of Management, 31 (2005), pp. 7-27
[Hair et al., 2012]
J.F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, C.M. Ringle, J.A. Mena.
An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (2012), pp. 414-433
[Hair et al., 2011]
J.F. Hair, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt.
PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet.
The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19 (2011), pp. 139-152
[Hair et al., 2013]
J.F. Hair, G.T.M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt.
A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Sage Publications, (2013),
[Heitmann and Tidten, 2011]
M. Heitmann, K. Tidten.
New Business Models for the Computer Gaming Industry: Selling an Adventure.
Business, Technological, and Social Dimensions of Computer Games: Multidisciplinary Development, pp. 401-415
[Hippel, 1988]
E. Hippel.
The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, (1988),
[Hippel, 1986 jul]
E. Hippel.
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.
Management Science, 32 (1986 jul.), pp. 791-805
[Hirschman, 1980]
E.C. Hirschman.
Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity.
Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (1980, December), pp. 283-295
[Hoyer et al., 2010]
W.D. Hoyer, R. Chandy, M. Dorotic, M. Krafft, S.S. Singh.
Consumer cocreation in new product development.
Journal of Service Research, 13 (2010), pp. 283-296
[Hubbard and Armstrong, 1994]
R. Hubbard, S.J. Armstrong.
Replications and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary.
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11 (1994), pp. 233-248
[Hunter, 2001]
J.E. Hunter.
The desperate need for replications.
Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (2001), pp. 149-158
[Hurt et al., 1977]
T.H. Hurt, K. Joseph, C.D. COOK.
Scales for the measurement of innovativeness.
Human Communication Research, 4 (1977), pp. 58-65
[Im et al., 2003]
S. Im, B.L. Bayus, C.H. Mason.
An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (2003), pp. 61-73
[Im et al., 2007]
S. Im, C.H. Mason, M.B. Houston.
Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? The intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (2007), pp. 63-75
[Kirton, 1976]
M. Kirton.
Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure.
Journal of applied psychology, 61 (1976), pp. 622-629
[Leavitt and Waton, 1975]
C. Leavitt, J. Waton.
Development of a scale for innovativeness.
Advances in Consumer Research, 2 (1975), pp. 545-552
[Lymaiem et al., 2000]
M. Lymaiem, M. Khalifa, A. Frini.
What Makes Consumers Buy From Internet?.
A Longitudinal Study of Online Shopping, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics--Part A: Systems and Humans, 30 (2000), pp. 421-432
[Lusch, 2007]
R.F. Lusch.
Marketing’s evolving identity: defining our future.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26 (2007), pp. 261-268
[Marketing Science Institute, 2008]
Marketing Science Institute.
2008-2010 Research Priorities, Marketing Science Institute, (2008),
[Marketing Science Institute, 2010]
Marketing Science Institute.
2010-2012 Research Priorities, Marketing Science Institute, (2010),
[Marketing Science Institute, 2012]
Marketing Science Institute.
2012-2014 Research Priorities, Marketing Science Institute, (2012),
[Marketing Science Institute, 2014]
Marketing Science Institute.
2014-2016 Research Priorities, Marketing Science Institute, (2014),
[Midgley and Dowling, 1993]
D.F. Midgley, G.R. Dowling.
A longitudinal study of product form innovation: the interaction between predispositions and social messages.
Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (1993), pp. 611-625
[Nambisan and Baron, 2009]
S. Nambisan, R.A. Baron.
Virtual Customer Environments: Testing a Model of Voluntary Participation in Value Co-creation Activities.
Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26 (2009), pp. 388-406
[O’Hern and Rindfleisch, 2009]
M.S. O’Hern, A. Rindfleisch.
Customer Co-Creation: A Typology and Research Agenda.
Marketing Research, pp. 84-106
[Pallister and Foxall, 1998]
J.G. Pallister, G.R. Foxall.
Psychometric properties of the Hurt–Joseph–Cook scales for the measurement of innovativeness.
Technovation, 18 (1998), pp. 663-675
[Preacher and Hayes, 2008]
K.J. Preacher, A.F. Hayes.
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.
Behavior research methods, 40 (2008), pp. 879-891
[Preacher and Hayes, 2004]
K.J. Preacher, A.F. Hayes.
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (2004), pp. 717-731
[Roberts et al., 2014]
D. Roberts, M. Hughes, K. Kertbo.
Exploring consumers’ motivations to engage in innovation through co-creation activities.
European Journal of Marketing, 48 (2014), pp. 147-169
[Schumann et al., 2010]
J.H. Schumann, F.V. Wangenheim, A. Stringfellow, Z. Yang, S. Praxmarer, F.R. Jiménez, V. Blazevic, R.M. Shannon, G. Shainesh, M. Komor.
Drivers of trust in relational service exchange: understanding the importance of cross-cultural differences.
Journal of Service Research, 13 (2010), pp. 453-468
[Smit et al., 2007]
E. Smit, F. Bronner, M. Tolboom.
Brand relationship quality and its value for personal contact.
Journal of Business Research, 60 (2007), pp. 627-633
[Vargo and Lusch, 2004]
S.L. Vargo, R.F. Lusch.
Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing.
Journal of marketing, 8 (2004), pp. 1-17
[Yi and Gong, 2013]
Y. Yi, T. Gong.
Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation.
Journal of Business Research, (2013),
[Yi et al., 2011]
Y. Yi, R. Nataraajan, T. Gong.
Customer Participation and Citizenship Behavioral Influences on Employee Performance, Satisfaction, Commitment, and Turnover Intention.
Journal of Business Research, 64 (2011, January), pp. 87-95
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltda. on behalf of Departamento de Administração Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade Universidade de São Paulo ¿ FEA/USP
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas