covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología Attenuation of the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation with...
Información de la revista
Vol. 38. Núm. 4.
Páginas 457-469 (noviembre - enero 2010)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 38. Núm. 4.
Páginas 457-469 (noviembre - enero 2010)
INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TECNOLÓGICA
Open Access
Attenuation of the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation with Intravenous Diltiazem and Esmolol Intravenous in Controlled Hypertensive Surgical patients
Atenuación de la respuesta presora a la laringoscopia e intubación entre diltiazem y esmolol en pacientes hipertensos controlados
Visitas
2316
Gazi Parvez*, Mohamad Ommid*, Arun Kumar Gupta**, Humariya Heena***, A.H. Hashia****
* MD Senior Resident, Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care. SKIMS, Soura, Jammu & Kashmir, India.
** MD Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care. Rural Medical College, Loni, Maharashtra, India.
*** Post Graduate, Dept. Of Community Medicine, SKIMS, Soura, J&K, India.
**** MD Professor and Head, Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care. Govt. Medical College, Srinagar, J&K, India.
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
SUMMARY
Introduction

Tachycardia and hypertension are well documented sequels of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation which is transient, highly variable and is generally well tolerated in healthy patients. In hypertensive patients, cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation is exaggerated. The aim of this study intended to find a better alternative by comparision amongst diltiazem and esmolol to attenuate the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation in Kasmiri Population.

Materials & Methods

Randomized placebo controlled double blind study. One hundred fifty hypertensive patients of both sexes (ASA II), controlled on antihypertensive drugs, between age range of 40-60 years scheduled for routine surgical procedures were divided into 3 groups Group A (10 ml of 5 % Dextrose), Group B (Diltiazem 0.2 mg/Kg) and Group C (Esmolol 1.5 mg/Kg). Baseline parameters, i.e. heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and rate pressure product were noted at baseline level, at 1 min., 3min. and 5min after tracheal intubation.

Results

Both Esmolol and Diltiazem showed statistically significant attenuation of rise in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and rate pressure product when compared to control. However Diltiazem failed to attenuate rise in heart rate.

Conclusions

We conclude that Esmolol is a very effective agent in attenuating the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation in controlled hypertensive patients.

Keywords:
Esmolol
diltiazem
Laryngoscopy
Intubation
blood pressure (Source: MeSH, NLM)
RESUMEN
Introducción

La taquicardia e hipertensión son efectos bien documentados de la laringoscopia e intubación orotraqueal que son transitorios, muy variables y generalmente bien toleradas en los pacientes sanos. Sin embargo, en los pacientes hipertensos, la respuesta cardíaca a la laringoscopia e intubación es exagerada. El objetivo de este estudio es encontrar la mejor alternativa entre diltiazem y esmolol para atenuar la respuesta presora a la laringoscopia e intubación en una población de Cachemira.

Materiales y métodos

Estudio aleatorizado controlado doble ciego. Ciento cincuenta pacientes hipertensos de ambos sexos (ASA II), controlados con drogas antihipertensivas con edades entre los 40 y 60 años programados para cirugías rutinarias fueron divididos en tres grupos, grupo A (10 ml de dextrosa al 5 %), grupo B (diltiazem 0,2 mg por kilo), y grupo C (esmolol 1,5 mg por kilo). Los parámetros de base como frecuencia cardíaca, presión arterial sistólica, presión arterial diastólica, presión arterial media y doble producto, fueron anotados al inicio al minuto 1 al minuto 3 y al minuto 5 después de la intubación traqueal.

Resultados

Tanto el esmolol como el diltiazem demostraron atenuación estadísticamente significativa de la presión arterial sistólica, diastólica y media, y del doble producto, cuando se compararon al control. Sin embargo el diltiazem no pudo evitar un aumento de la frecuencia cardíaca.

Conclusiones

Concluimos que el esmolol es un agente muy efectivo para atenuar la respuesta presora a la laringoscopia e intubación en pacientes hipertensos controlados.

Palabras clave:
Propanolaminas
diltiazem
laringoscopia
intubación
presión sanguínea (Fuente: DeCS, BIREME)
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
REFERENCES
[1.]
C. Prys Roberts, P. Foex, G.P. Biro, J.G. Roberts.
Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension with adrenergic beta receptor blockade.
Br J Anaesth, 45 (1973), pp. 671
[2.]
T. Ishikawa, T. Nishino, K. Hiraga.
Immediate response to arterial blood pressure and heart rate to sudden inhalation of high concentration of isoflurane in normotensive and hypertensive patients.
Anesth Analg, (1993), pp. 1022-1025
[3.]
R. Korpinen, L. Saarniraara, K. Siren.
Modification of haemodynamic responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation with alfentanil, esmolol and their combination.
Can J Anaesth, 42 (1995), pp. 298-304
[4.]
A.P. Yates, D.N. Hunter.
Anaesthesia and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The effects of enalapril on per operative cardiovascular stability.
Anaesthesia, 43 (1988), pp. 935-938
[5.]
K. Nishi Kawa, K. Omote, S. Kawane.
A comparison of haemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by using light wand device and laryngoscope in normotensive and hypertensive patients.
Anesth Analg, 90 (2000), pp. 1203-1207
[6.]
G.B. Puri, Y.K. Batra.
Effects of nifidipine on cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
Br J Anaesth, 60 (1988), pp. 579-581
[7.]
B.D. King, L.C. Harris, F.E. Grafenstein.
Reflex circulatory response to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation performed during general anaesthesia..
Anaesthesiology, 12 (1951), pp. 556-566
[8.]
P.P. Shroff, S.N. Mohit, L.D. Panchal.
Bolus administration of esmolol in controlling the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation.
J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol, 20 (2004), pp. 69-72
[9.]
S. Slogoff, A.S. Keats.
Randomized trial of primary anesthetic agent on outcome of coronary artery by pass operation.
Anesthesiology, 70 (1989), pp. 179-188
[10.]
D.R. Miller, R.J. Marineau.
Esmolol for control of haemodynamic response during anaesthetic induction.
Can J Anaesth, 36 (1989), pp. S164-S165
[11.]
A.J. Coleman, C. Jordan.
Cardiovascular response to anaesthesia. Influence of beta adrenoceptro blockade with metaprolol.
Anaesthesia, 35 (1980), pp. 972-978
[12.]
S. Sheppard, C.J. Eagle, L. Strunin.
A bolus dose of esmolol attenuates tachycardia and hypertension after tracheal intubation.
Can J Anaesth, 37 (1990), pp. 202-205
[13.]
S. Kumar, M.N. Mishra, S. Bathla.
Comparative study of the efficacy of i.v. esmolol diltiazem and magnesium sulphate in attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
Ind J Anaesth, 47 (2003), pp. 41-44
[14.]
J. Hasegawa, H. Mitshuhata, S. Mat sumoti, K. Enzan.
Attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with bolus injection of diltiazem..
Masaui, 41 (1992), pp. 356-362
[15.]
K. Mikawa, J. Ikegaki, R. Goto, et al.
Effect of diltiazem on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation.
Anaesthesia, 45 (1990), pp. 289-293
[16.]
Y. Fujii, H. Tanaka, H. Toyooka.
Circulatory response to laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation in normotesnive and hypertensive patients.
Can J Anaesth, 42 (1995), pp. 32-369
[17.]
S.J. Sarnoff, E. Braunwald, G.H. Welch, R.B. Case, W.N. Stainsby, R. Macruz.
Haemodynamic determinants of oxygen consumption of heart with special reference to tension time index.
Am J Physiol, 192 (1985), pp. 148
[18.]
P.G. Menkhaus, J.G. Reves, Kissinelger, et al.
Cardiovascular effects of Esmolol in anesthetized bumans.
Anesth Analg, 64 (1985), pp. 327-334
Copyright © 2010. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo