Aproximaciones complementarias y alternativas al cuidado de la salud en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología: estudio de prevalencia

Sánchez, Ricardo; Venegas, Marco

doi:10.1016/S0123-9015(10)70094-9

Información del artículo

Resumen

Bibliografía

Descargar PDF

Estadísticas

Resumen

Objetivo

Determinar la prevalencia de uso de medicinas alternativas y complementarias en los pacientes oncológicos del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) de Colombia.

Métodos

Estudio transversal con un componente cualitativo (grupos focales), a partir del cual se diseñó una encuesta para caracterizar y determinar la frecuencia del uso de terapias alternativas en pacientes del INC.

Resultados

Se aplicaron 359 encuestas en pacientes con distintos tipos de cánceres (ginecológicos, de mama, de piel, de cabeza y cuello, del sistema osteomuscular y gastrointestinales). Se reportaron 38 intervenciones diferentes. La mediana de tratamientos utilizados por paciente fue de 2. El 73,5% de los entrevistados (264 pacientes, IC95%: 68,7%-78%) usaron métodos terapéuticos de medicina complementaria y alternativa; especialmente, del grupo de terapias herbales. La principal fuente de acceso a estas terapias fue a través de familiares o conocidos (68%). Los médicos sólo recomendaron su uso en 8% de los pacientes encuestados.

Conclusiones

Se encontró una reiterada utilización de terapias complementarias y alternativas; el grupo de terapias herbales basadas en plantas fue el más reportado en dicho grupo de pacientes. El acceso a éstas no se hace a través de los sistemas de salud oficiales. En nuestro país se requiere mayor investigación en el área.

Palabras clave:

terapias complementarias

neoplasia

estudios transversales

prevalencia

Summary

Objective

To determine use prevalence for alternative and complementary medicines at the National Cancer Institute of Colombia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out. Focus groups were used for designing the survey.

Results

359 surveys were carried out corresponding to patients with different types of cancer. In total 38 types of complementary medicines were reported and the median number of therapies per patient was 2. Some 73.5% (95%CI 68.7%-78.0%) used complementary and alternative therapies, being the group of herbal medicine the most commonly used. Doctors recommended their use in 8% of cases. The family and nearby persons were the main source for accessing this type of therapies.

Conclusions

There is a high-frequency utilization of complementary and alternative therapies. The group of herbal medicine is the most common. The findings contradict the lack of access to this type of therapies within the health system. In our country, additional research is needed in this area.

Key words:

Complementary therapies

neoplasm

cross-sectional studies

prevalence

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF

Referencias

[1.]

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. What is Complementary and Alternative Medicine? [internet]. 14 oct. 2009 [citado: 25 feb. 2010]. Disponible en: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/.

[2.]

D.M. Eisenberg, R.C. Kessler, C. Foster, F.E. Norlock, D.R. Calkins, T.L. Delbanco.

Unconventional medicine in the United States Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use.

N Engl J Med, 328 (1993), pp. 246-252

http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199301283280406 | Medline

[3.]

Medline Plus. Complementary and alternative medicine. [internet]. 19 feb 2010, [citado: 25 feb. 2010]. Disponible en: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/complementaryandalternativemedicine.html.

[4.]

B.R. Cassileth, G. Deng.

Complementary and alternative therapies for cancer.

Oncologist, 9 (2004), pp. 80-89

Medline

[5.]

D.M. Eisenberg, R.B. Davis, S.L. Ettner, S. Appel, S. Wilkey, M. Van Rompay, et al.

Trends in alternative medicine use in the Unites States 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

JAMA, 280 (1988), pp. 1569-1575

Medline

[6.]

H. Ni, C. Simile, A.M. Hardy.

Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by United States adults: results from the 1999 national health interview survey.

Med Care, 40 (2002), pp. 353-358

Medline

[7.]

P. Devine.

Use of complementary health practices by prostate carcinoma patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Cancer, 88 (2000), pp. 615-619

Medline

[8.]

C. Myers, M.L. Stuber, J.I. Bonamer-Rheingans, L.K. Zeltzer.

Complementary therapies and childhood cancer.

Cancer Control, 12 (2005), pp. 172-180

Medline

[9.]

The University of Texas. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Complementary/integrative therapies. [internet]. 2007 (citado: 27 dic. 2009). Disponible en: http://www.mdanderson.org/departments/cimer/dindex.cfm?pn=5ac57a83-0f8d-4a3f-b743a0cdf23f193c.

[10.]

E. Sueco Tibaná, P. Taschner Goldenstein, L. de Melo Ribeiro, F. Lewin, É.S. Valesin Filho, H. Prado Soares, et al.

Praying correlates with higher quality of life: results from a survey on complementary /alternative medicine use among a group of Brazilian cancer patients.

Sao Paulo Med J, 122 (2004), pp. 60-63

http://dx.doi.org//S1516-31802004000200005 | Medline

[11.]

R.T. Penson, R.A. Partridge, P. Rudd, M.V. Seiden, J.E. Nelson, B.A. Chabner, et al.

Laughter: the best medicine?.

Oncologist, 10 (2005), pp. 651-660

http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.10-8-651 | Medline

[12.]

University of California Medical Center. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Classification of Alternative Therapies. [internet]. 19 feb. 2010 [citado: 25 feb. 2010]. Disponible en: http://cancer.ucsd.edu/Outreach/PublicEducation/CAMs /appendixa.asp.

[13.]

Consensus NIH Conference.

Acupuncture.

JAMA, 280 (1998), pp. 1518-1524

Medline

[14.]

M.C. Elias, E. Alves.

[Non-conventional medicine: prevalence in oncologic patients].

Rev Bras Cancerol, 48 (2002), pp. 523-532

[15.]

M.A. Richardson, T. Sanders, J.L. Palmer, A. Greisinger, S.E. Singletary.

Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology.

J Clin Oncol, 18 (2000), pp. 2505-2514

http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.13.2505 | Medline

[16.]

B.R. Cassileth.

Complementary therapies: the American experience.

Support Care Cancer, 8 (2000), pp. 16-23

Medline

[17.]

S.M. Sagar.

Acupuncture as an evidence-based option for symptom control in cancer patients.

Curr Treat Options Oncol, 9 (2008), pp. 117-126

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-008-0063-3 | Medline

[18.]

A. Naeim, S.M. Dy, K.A. Lorenz, H. Sanati, A. Walling, S.M. Asch.

Evidence-based recommendations for cancer nausea and vomiting.

J Clin Oncol, 26 (2008), pp. 3903-3910

http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9533 | Medline

[19.]

J. Chiu, T. Yau, R.J. Epstein.

Complications of traditional Chinese/herbal medicines (TCM)--a guide for perplexed oncologists and other cancer caregivers.

Support Care Cancer, 17 (2009), pp. 231-240

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0526-x | Medline

[20.]

J.S. McCune, A.J. Hatfield, A.A. Blackburn, P.O. Leith, R.B. Livingston, G.K. Ellis.

Potential of chemotherapy-herb interactions in adult cancer patients.

Support Care Cancer, 12 (2004), pp. 454-462

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0598-1 | Medline

[21.]

R.H. Mathijssen, J. Verweij, P. de Bruijn, W.J. Loos, A. Spareboom.

Effects of St John's wort on irinotecan metabolism.

J Natl Cancer Inst, 94 (2002), pp. 1247-1249

Medline

[22.]

G.M. D’Andrea.

Use of antioxidants during chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be avoided.

CA Cancer J Clin, 55 (2005), pp. 319-321

Medline

[23.]

I.L. Bourgeault.

Physicians’ attitudes toward patients’ use of alternative cancer therapies.

CMAJ, 155 (1996), pp. 1679-1685

Medline

[24.]

M. Ukiya, T. Akihisa, K. Yasukawa, H. Tokuda, T. Suzuki, Y. Kimura.

Anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor-promoting, and cytotoxic activities of constituents of marigold (Calendula officinalis) flowers.

J Nat Prod, 69 (2006), pp. 1692-1696

http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np068016b | Medline

[25.]

C. Ulbricht, J. Armstrong, E. Basch, S. Basch, S. Bent, C. Dacey, et al.

An evidence-based systematic review of Aloe vera by the natural standard research collaboration.

J Herb Pharmacother, 7 (2007), pp. 279-323

Medline

[26.]

E. Furusawa, A. Hirazumi, S. Story, J. Jensen.

Antitumour potential of a polysaccharide-rich substance from the fruit juice of Morinda citrifolia (Noni) on sarcoma 180 ascites tumour in mice.

Phytother Res, 17 (2003), pp. 1158-1164

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1307 | Medline

[27.]

G. Liu, A. Bode, W.Y. Ma, S. Sang, C.T. Ho, Z. Dong.

Two novel glycosides from the fruits of Morinda citrifolia (noni) inhibit AP-1 transactivation and cell transformation in the mouse epidermal JB6 cell line.

Cancer Res, 61 (2001), pp. 5749-5756

Medline

[28.]

R. Pilarski, M. Poczekaj-Kostrzewska, D. Ciesiołka, K. Szyfter, K. Gulewicz.

Antiproliferative activity of various Uncaria tomentosa preparations on HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells.

Pharmacol Rep, 59 (2007), pp. 565-572

Medline

[29.]

J. Styczynski, M. Wysocki.

Alternative medicine remedies might stimulate viability of leukemic cells.

Pediatr Blood Cancer, 46 (2006), pp. 94-98

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20513 | Medline