covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Cancerología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Cancerología Arteriovenous malformation masking associated anaplastic ganglioglioma in an ado...
Información de la revista
Vol. 22. Núm. 4.
Páginas 180-185 (octubre - diciembre 2018)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4257
Vol. 22. Núm. 4.
Páginas 180-185 (octubre - diciembre 2018)
Case report
Acceso a texto completo
Arteriovenous malformation masking associated anaplastic ganglioglioma in an adolescent
Malformación arteriovenosa asociada enmascara un ganglioglioma anaplásico multifocal en un adolescente
Visitas
4257
Gustavo Adolfo Carvajal-Barriosa,
Autor para correspondencia
c.arabinosido@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Jimena Ortizb, Natalia Gonzálezc, José Ariasd, Fernando Velandiae, Pilar Guerrerof, Eugenia Espinosag
a Physician, pediatrics resident, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá D. C, Colombia
b Neuroradiologist, professor ad honorem, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada (UMNG)-Hospital Militar Central (HMC), Bogotá D. C, Colombia
c Pediatric hematologist/oncologist, HMC-HMC, Bogotá D. C, Colombia
d Pathologist, HMC. Professor ad honorem UMNG-HMC, Bogotá D. C, Colombia
e Neuropathologist, Senior professor, Neuroscience Group, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D. C, Colombia
f Pediatric neurologist, associate professor of pediatric neurology, UMNG-HMC, Bogotá D. C, Colombia
g Pediatric neurologist, tenured profesor in pediatric neurology UMNG-HMC, Coordinator of graduate studies in pediatric neurology UMNG-HMC, Bogotá D. C, Colombia
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (4)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract

Grade III anaplastic ganglioglioma is an aggressive, rare, and radiosensitive central nervous system (CNS) tumour. It is more common in males, with a ratio of 1.3 to 1. Its peak incidence is in the third decade of life. Only 10 cases were recorded in children in Colombia from 2000 to 2014, with a fatal outcome in spite of radiation therapy. This is a case of an adolescent, who began having headaches, with warning signs related to an arteriovenous malformation hindering the diagnosis of this rare tumour. This presented in its aggressive, multi-focus form. Knowledge of clinical manifestations of space-occupying intracranial lesions facilitates the assessment and treatment of affected children.

Keywords:
Brain tumour
Child
Intracranial hypertension
Ganglioglioma
Headache
Resumen

El ganglioglioma anaplásico grado III es un tumor del sistema nervioso central (SNC) agresivo, infrecuente y radiosensible. Afecta más a hombres en una relación 1,3 a 1. Su pico de incidencia se encuentra en la tercera década de la vida. Existen solo 10 casos registrados en niños en Colombia desde el 2000 al 2014, con desenlace fatal a pesar de la radioterapia. Se presenta un caso de un adolescente que debutó con cefalea con signos de alarma asociado a una malformación arteriovenosa que dificultó el diagnóstico de este raro tumor, cuya presentación fue la más agresiva: la forma multicéntrica. El conocer las manifestaciones clínicas de lesiones intracraneales ocupantes de espacio facilita la evaluación y tratamiento a los niños afectados.

Palabras clave:
Tumor cerebral
Niño
Hipertensión endocraneana
Ganglioglioma
Cefalea
Texto completo
Introduction

The incidence of CNS tumors is variable,1 and estimated to be 35 cases per million in children under the age of 15. They are the second group of pediatric malignant tumors, making up 20-25% of all tumors;1,2 60-70% are of glial origin, and in most of them there is no metastasis.2 Usually, the supratentorial tumors are seen more in children younger than two years, and in late adolescence.2 There is an association with neurofibromatosis type I, tuberous sclerosis, and Von Hippel-Lindau, Li-Fraumeni, Turcot, Cowden, retinoblastoma (Rb), rhabdoid tumor and Gorlin syndromes,2 as well as with exposure to ionizing radiation, immunosuppression, and infection.2 Gangliogliomas (GGs) make up 0.4% of all intracranial tumors in children,1–3 they are rare, and they belong to the group of neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors.3 They predominantly affect males, in a ratio of 1.3 to 1.4 In Colombia, the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología [National Cancer Institute] (INC) recorded 10 cases between 2000 and 2014 in children under the age of 18.5

Clinical case

A 14 year old adolescent male with normal neurodevelopment, who in 2009 began to present oppressive bilateral occipital headaches: intensity 7/10, self-limited, and with impaired visual acuity. He consulted in 2014 due to a bilateral global, throbbing headache with a 10/10 intensity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed a left thalamic arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with multiple flow voids forming a nest, associated with a vascular drainage structure, without signs of rupture or mass effect. He was referred to Hospital Militar Central (HMC) where angiography showed a Spetzler-Martin grade III AVM, and expectant management was chosen (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Digital subtraction angiography demonstrates classic arteriovenous malformation in the left thalamic region with drainage to the internal cerebral vein, Spetzler-Martin IIIb.

(0.04MB).

In 2015, he presented anticipatory emesis with food, as well as hematemesis and progressive oppressive right parietal headache with a 10/10 intensity, projectile vomiting, dysarthria, drowsiness, weakness, paresthesias, and left leg monoparesia associated with intracerebral hemorrhage seen on computerized axial tomography (CT); he received phenytoin and was referred to HMC. On admission, he was normotensive, Tanner 2, without apparent growth alterations. A brain MRI showed an acute right frontal basal hemorrhage, perilesional edema, midline shift, and left posterior temporal cortical lesions which followed vascular territory, without an ischemic appearance (figure 2). His angiographic diagnosis was, therefore, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), with a possible tumor lesion.

Figure 2.

Brain MRI axial cuts: a. T2, b. T1 and c. T1+MC. Right frontal parasagittal cortical-subcortical intra-axial mass of intermediate signal intensity, with a blood component, not highlighted by the contrast media. Positive signs of compression with marked adjacent vasogenic edema, and a subfalcine hernia to the left. Shows a lesion in the left thalamic region with multiple flow voids forming a nest, associated with a vascular drainage structure related to an AVM, without signs of rupture or mass effect.

(0.06MB).

Pediatric neurology ruled out mitochondrial, autoimmune and infectious disease, and considered it to be a CVA-like disease. At 24hours, pediatric hematology-oncology found bilateral ptosis, and blood dyscrasias were ruled out. He began to experience photophobia, dizziness, left-sided facial paresthesias, and a self-limited bifrontal headache. He was discharged, and an outpatient brain MRI documented an active brain bleed with worsening of the throbbing headache, vomiting, arterial hypertension, desaturation, obtundation, and two episodes of self-limited tonic-clonic seizures, confined to the left side of the body, with ipsilateral head and gaze deviation. The head CT showed de novo diffuse bilateral temporal and frontal hypodensity of the white matter, diminished breadth of the cisterns, white matter edema, midline shift to the left and obliteration of the frontal horn of the ipsilateral ventricle with thickening of the vein of Galen and the straight sinus, due to left thalamic malformation. Due to hematemesis, a syncopal episode, right hemiparesia, peribuccal cyanosis, upward gaze deviation with progression to total paresia, and generalized hypertonia, he was readmitted to HMC. The head CT showed a right frontal hypodense lesion without mass effect or signs of intracranial hypertension (IH). An interdisciplinary medical team concluded that a biopsy was needed, it showed hard, violet brain tissue, confirming a malignant CNS neoplasm with small, anaplastic tumor cells. Immunohistochemistry revealed grade III ganglioglioma, with poor expression of the P53 oncogene, and a 12% Ki67 cell proliferation index (figure 3).

Figure 3.

A and B. Neoplasia with compact growth and extension to the subarachnoid space. Two components can be seen: the neuronal component with dysmorphic neurons, pleomorphic nuclei (some with a prominent nucleolus), and loss of the Nissl bodies; and the mixed glial component with neoplastic astrocytes and some mitoses. C. Reactive glial fibrillary acidic protein. D. Focally reactive p53. E. Ganglion cells with fine granular markings. F. Ki67 15% lower in the neuronal component.

(0.51MB).

Due to grade III GG with a poor prognosis, radiation therapy and temozolomide were begun without a surgical option. Tumor effects on the eyes were ruled out. He was discharged for outpatient systemic polychemotherapy, but worsening headaches, vomiting, weakness, confusion, bradylalia and incoherent phrases led to his readmission a month later. An extrainstitutional opinion requested by the parents was reported as: ̈Grade III anaplastic ganglioma, according to the WHO classification̈. He was assessed using the WISC IV + pediatric Weschler intelligence quotient test, with a score of 58, related to the cognitive deficit secondary to frontal involvement. He began antineoplastic treatment with torpid progress and intermittent memory loss, leading to readmission to HMC. He had macroscopic hematuria, for which etiologies other than nephrotoxicity secondary to the antineoplastic treatment were ruled out. His condition worsened, with dyslalia, lateral pulsion, widened stance, decreased left-sided strength, and progressive back pain with painful thoracic and lumbar paravertebral points. Spinal column metastases were ruled out by MRI. He presented euvolemic hyponatremia with elevated natriuresis, and progressed from hyponatremia to hypernatremia secondary to neuroendocrine impairment, with supra- and sellar metastastic involvement of the hypophisis (figure 4). There was no pubertal or neurodevelopmental change on physical exam.

Figure 4.

Sagittal T1+MC brain MRI shows a sellar mass with suprasellar extension, lobulated, with a solid and cystic component, which is intensely highlighted by the contrast media. This lesion was not seen in previous studies.

(0.05MB).

He progressed to somnolence, left divergent strabismus, dysarthria, hemiparesia, inability to walk, and respiratory failure, and was transferred to the PICU. He presented fever, leukopenia and lymphopenia, with no microorganisms isolated in blood. He required hemodynamic and respiratory support for three weeks, after which he was able to change from an invasive ventilatory system to a non-invasive system, and was transferred to the pediatric neurology floor, where he died 14 months after the tumor diagnosis.

Discussion

Unexplained headaches in pediatrics are a warning sign, especially when they are associated with a progressive increase in frequency or intensity, increased intensity with Valsalva maneuvers, projectile vomiting, altered consciousness, dysarthria, diplopia, weakness, ataxia, dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, strabismus, papilledema, focalization, and IH. In these cases, space occupying lesions must be ruled out through neuroimaging, with tumors being the main differential diagnosis.6–10 This was seen in this case study patient, who began with progressive, oppressive bilateral occipital headaches, altered visual acuity, projectile vomiting, dysarthria, somnolence, weakness, convulsions and paresthesias related to the AVM. However, neuroimaging should be rationalized in children with headaches, as it is reported to be frequently used in patients with migraines, chronic headaches or headaches without red flags.11 The head MRI findings reported a greater impact on one lobe. In general, solids prefer the temporal lobe (>70%), as in this case study, although they have been described in the frontal, parietal, cerebellar, hypophyseal, pineal gland, brain stem, spinal cord and intraventricular regions.2,12–24 There have been reports of cystic, hemorrhagic and solid components which make tumor resection difficult because of edema, signs of IH and neuroendocrine involvement, which were observed in the reported case due to the presence of hypophyseal lesions. No cases of GG with angiographically documented AVM in children were found in the literature review. This was an interesting finding, since the AVM bleed masked the presentation and clinical diagnosis of the case study, due to its behavior as a space-occupying lesion.

Ganglioglioma has a rapid-growth neuronal, ganglionic, and glial clonal ontogenesis, described by Koelsche et al.,25 with a V600E point mutation in the BRAF 1 gene, non-specific for GG, but whose presence is associated with a lower recurrence-free survival. This mutation stimulates the cascade of the MAPK (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases) kinase-dependent protein family, which stimulates the mitosis, differentiation, and resistance to apoptosis of cell groups which then become neoplasms by duplication of 7q34, with fusion of KIAA1549-BRAF,26 having a poor survival prognosis. This was not studied in our patient since the necessary tissue was not available, as it was used for the extrainstitutional opinion. Another histopathological characteristic is increased vascular endothelial proliferation manifested by intracranial bleeds, which were described in this case study. These have a poor prognosis, with loss of CD34, p53 mutation, expression of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), synaptophysin, neurofilament, neuron specific enolase, CD56, variably expressed chromogranin, and Ki67 > 5%, as in the described case, with Ki67 >12%.2–3

With regard to treatment, there is no chemotherapeutic protocol, but the preliminary report of a phase three study stated that there was no difference in survival in the combination of temozolamide and radiation therapy plus bevacizumab.23 However, in the case being reported, a 14 month survival was achieved with a combination of temozolamide and radiation therapy, similar to that reported by Zanello M et al. between 2000 and 2015.27

The prognostic factor which improves survival is unifocal disease, which does not apply in this case, since multifocal disease was documented.4,23–29 Multifocal disease has a high recurrence rate compared with low-grade GGs;30,31 it is difficult to control due to its multifocal extension, which makes complete surgical resection difficult.30–34 Also, the impairment of p53 with elevated Ki67 is associated with an aggressive biological behavior, with a less favorable prognosis. There is no apparent benefit from adjunct radiation therapy, because it does not improve the survival rate, and may cause CN II and VIII neuropathy, involvement of the lens and retina, neuroendocrine impairment and the appearance of new neoplasms.2,28,29 Unexplained headaches in pediatrics are a warning sign. If they are associated with an increase in the frequency or intensity of the headaches, an increased intensity with Valsalva maneuvers, projectile vomiting, altered consciousness, dysarthria, diplopia, weakness, ataxia, dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, strabismus, papilledema, focalization and IH (arterial hypertension, bradycardia, and altered breathing patterns), space-occupying lesions must be ruled out by neuroimaging, with tumors being the main differential diagnosis. Gangliogliomas, which are tumors, have very poor survival rates, which may be associated with intracranial bleeding and refractory epilepsy, and topographical neurologic impairment.

Funding sources

This work was carried out in the Pediatric Neurology Department of the Central Military Hospital.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Javier Muñoz Narváez, Pediatric Oncologist, Clínica del Country, for his review and opinion of the report. To Dr. Rodrigo Castro Rebolledo, Physiatrist, for his help in drafting and bibliographic searching.

References
[1]
U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; [Acceso en enero 24 de 2017]2016. Disponible en: www.cdc.gov/uscs
[2]
D.W. Parsons, I.F. Pollack, D.A. Hass-Kogan, T.Y. Pussaint, A.M. Adesina, M.M. Chitagumpala, et al.
Gliomas, Ependymomas, and Other Nonembryonal Tumors of the Central Nervous System, Seventh edition, pp. 628-670
Chapter 26.
[3]
D.N. Louis, H. Ohgaki, O.D. Wiestler, W.K. Cavenne, D.W. Ellison, D. Figarella-Branger.
Neuronal and miwed neuronal-glial tumours. En: WHO classificaction of tumors of the central nervous system.
Fourth edition, WHO, (2016), pp. 131-141
Chapeter 6.
[4]
SEER [Base de datos en línea]; Bethesda: Surveillance Research Program; 1975- [Acceso en noviembre 17 de 2016]; 2016. Disponible en: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/results_merged/sect_29_childhood_cancer_iccc.pdf
[5]
Grupo de Vigilancia Epidemiológica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia. Distribución de casos nuevos de gangliogliomas anaplásicos por edad y sexo [reporte no publicado], 2000-2014.
[6]
L. Papetti, A. Capuano, S. Tarantino, F. Vigevano, M. Valeriani.
Headache as an emergency in children and adolescents.
Curr Pain Headache Rep., 19 (2015), pp. 3
[7]
T. Roser, M. Bonfert, F. Ebinger, M. Blankenburg, B. Ertl-Wagner, F. Heinen.
Primary versus Secondary Headache in Children: A Frequent Diagnostic Challenge in Clinical Routine.
Neuropediatrics., 44 (2013), pp. 34-39
[8]
G.A. Alexiou, M.I. Argyropoulou.
Neuroimaging in childhood headache: a systematic review.
Pediatr Radiol., 43 (2013), pp. 777-784
[9]
S. Wilne, J. Collier, C. Kennedy, K. Koller, R. Grundy, D. Walker.
Presentation of childhood CNS tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Oncol., 8 (2007), pp. 685-695
[10]
H.J. Hsiao, J.L. Huang, S.H. Hsia, J.J. Lin, I.A. Huang, C.T. Wu.
Headache in the pediatric emergency service: a medical center experience.
Pediatr Neonatol., 55 (2014), pp. 208-212
[11]
B.C. Callaghan, K.A. Kerber, R.J. Pace, L. Skolarus, W. Cooper, J.F. Burke.
Headache neuroimaging: Routine testing when guidelines recommend against them.
Cephalalgia., 35 (2015), pp. 1144-1152
[12]
P. Celli, M. Scarpinati, B. Nardacci, L. Cervoni, G.P. Cantore.
Gangliogliomas of the cerebral hemispheres. Report of 14 Cases with long-term follow-up and review of the literature.
Acta Neurochir (Wien)., 125 (1993), pp. 52-57
[13]
S. Scoccianti, F. Giordano, B. Agresti, B. Detti, S. Cipressi, D. Franceschini, et al.
Pediatric primary anaplastic ganglioglioma: A case report and review of the literature.
Pediatr Neurosurg., 48 (2012), pp. 35-41
[14]
M. Gelabert-González, J.M. Amo, A. Arcos Algaba, R. Serramito García, D. Castro Bouzas, L. Díaz Cabana, et al.
Gangliogliomas intracraneales. Revisión de una serie de 20 pacientes.
Neurología., 26 (2011), pp. 405-415
[15]
D. Zhang, T.D. Henning, L.G. Zou, L.B. Hu, L. Wen, X.Y. Feng, et al.
Intracranial ganglioglioma: clinicopathological and MRI findings in 16 patients.
Clin Radiol., 63 (2008), pp. 80e-91e
[16]
B. Liu, Y. Arakawa, D. Murata, Y. Mineharu, R. Yokogawa, M. Tanji, et al.
Clinicopathological, Radiological, and Genetic Analyses of Cerebellar Gangliogliomas with Long-Term Survival.
World Neurosurgery., 94 (2016), pp. 521-528
[17]
Y. Odia.
Gangliocytomas and Gangliogliomas: Review of Clinical, Pathologic and Genetic Features.
Clin Oncol., 1 (2016), pp. 1-6
[18]
P.J. Mickle.
Ganglioglioma in Children. A review of 32 cases at the University of Florida.
Pediatr Neurosurg., 18 (1992), pp. 310-314
[19]
F.F. Lang, J.F. Epstein, J. Ransohoff, J.C. Allen, J. Wisoff, R.I. Abbott, et al.
Central nervous system gangliogliomas.
J Neurosurg., 79 (1993), pp. 867-873
[20]
W. Lüdemann, R. Banan, C. Hartmann, H. Bertalanffy, C. Di Rocco.
Pediatric Intracranial primary anaplastic ganglioglioma.
Childs Nerv Syst., (2016 Dic 5),
[Epub ahead of print]
[21]
D.S. Jeevan, J.A. Neil, A. Mohan, M. Tobias.
Hemorrhagic ganglioglioma of the posterior fossa: case report.
Pediatr Neurosurg., 49 (2013), pp. 33-37
[22]
A. Kogler, T. Hranilovic, B. Bozic, J. Kogler.
Concomitant bihemispheric cerebral ganglioglioma and hemangioma in an 18-month old child: case report.
J Child Neurol., 15 (2000), pp. 244-248
[23]
S. Puget, A. Alshehri, K. Beccaria, T. Blauwblomme, G. Paternoster, S. James, et al.
Pediatric infratentorial Ganglioglioma.
Childs Nerv Syst., 31 (2015), pp. 1707-1716
[24]
G.L. Prasad, R. Kumar, N. Kurwale, V. Suri.
Intraventricular gangliogliomas: a review.
World Neurosurg., 87 (2016), pp. 39-44
[25]
C. Koelsche, A. Wöhrer, A. Jeibmann, J. Schittenhelm, G. Schindler, M. Preusser, et al.
Mutant BRAF V600E protein in ganglioglioma is predominantly expressed by neuronal tumor cells.
Acta Neuropathol., 125 (2013), pp. 891-900
[26]
F. Del Bufalo, A. Carai, L. Figà-Talamanca, B. Pettorini, C. Mallucci, F. Giangaspero, et al.
Response of recurrent BRAFV600E mutated ganglioglioma to Vemurafenib as single agent.
J Translat Med., 12 (2014), pp. 356
[27]
O.L. Chinot, W. Wick, W. Mason, R. Henriksson, F. Saran, R. Nishikawa, et al.
Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy–temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
N Engl J Med., 370 (2014), pp. 709-722
[28]
M. Zanello, M. Pages, A. Tauziède-Espariat, R. Saffroy, S. Puget, L. Lacroix, et al.
Clinical, imaging, histopathological and molecular characterization of anaplastic ganglioglioma.
J Neuropathol Exp Neuro., 75 (2016), pp. 971-980
[29]
J. Young Song, J. Hoon Kim, Y. Hyun Cho, C. Jin Kim, E. Jung Lee.
Treatment and outcomes for gangliogliomas: a single-center review of 16 patients.
Brain Tumor Res Treat., 2 (2014), pp. 49-55
[30]
S.K. Selvanathan, S. Hammouche, H.J. Salminen, M.D. Jenkinson.
Outcome and prognostic features in anaplastic ganglioglioma: analysis of cases from the SEER database.
J Neurooncol., 105 (2011), pp. 539-545
[31]
M. Majores, M. Von Lehe, J. Fassunke, J. Schramm, A.J. Becker, M. Simon.
Tumor recurrence and malignant progression of gangliogliomas.
Cancer., 113 (2008), pp. 3355-3363
[32]
C. Luyken, I. Blümcke, R. Fimmers, H. Urbach, O.D. Wiestler, J. Schramm.
Supratentorial Gangliogliomas: Histopathologic Grading and Tumor Recurrence in 184 patients with a median follow-up of 8 years.
Cancer., 101 (2004), pp. 146-155
[33]
M. El Khashab, L. Gargan, L. Margraf, K. Koral, F. Nejat, D. Swift, et al.
Predictors of tumor progression among children with gangliogliomas. Clinical article.
J Neurosurg Pediatr., 3 (2009), pp. 461-466
[34]
R.W. Dudley, M.R. Torok, D.R. Gallegos, J.M. Mulcahy-Levy, L.M. Hoffman, A.K. Liu, et al.
Hoffman LM. Pediatric low-grade ganglioglioma: epidemiology, treatments, and outcome analysis on 348 children from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.
Neurosurgery, 76 (2015), pp. 313-320
Copyright © 2018. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo