Información del artículo
Abstract
There are numerous reports on successful results for total hip replacement being achieved through preoperative planning. However, none of these reports have been focused on the treatment of hip fractures. Preoperative planning has increased importance in this group of patients as the correct biomechanical reconstruction of the hip is made more difficult by the absence of an intact femur.
This report describes a method for preoperative planning based on the reproduction of the biomechanics of the intact contralateral hip, if and when it is anatomically normal. The plan is based on radiological measurements that are reproduced during surgery to achieve normal biomechanical reconstruction for the fractured hip.
Keywords:
Hip fracture
Hip arthroplasty
Preoperative planning
Resumen
Existen numerosas publicaciones sobre la planificación preoperatoria en los reemplazos de cadera electivos con resultados satisfactorios. Sin embargo, ninguna de ellas se ha enfocado para el tratamiento de las fracturas de cadera. La planificación aumenta su importancia en estos pacientes debido a que la reconstrucción de la biomecánica de la cadera se ve dificultada por la ausencia de un fémur intacto.
En este trabajo se describe un método de planificación preoperatoria basado en la reproducción de la biomecánica de la cadera contralateral no fracturada, siempre y cuando ésta sea anatómicamente normal. El plan registra medidas radiológicas que se reproducen durante la cirugía para lograr una reconstrucción de la biomecánica normal de la cadera fracturada.
Palabras clave:
Fractura de cadera
Artroplastia de cadera
Planificación preoperatoria
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1.]
J.A. Kanis, O. Johnell, C. De Laet, B. Jonsson, A. Oden, A.K. Ogelsby.
International variations in hip fracture probabilities: Implications for risk assessment.
J Bone Miner Res, 17 (2002), pp. 1237-1244
[2.]
O. Löfman, K. Berglund, L. Larsson, G. Toss.
Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: Redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types.
Osteoporos Int, 13 (2002), pp. 18-25
[3.]
L.E. Wehren, J. Magazinar.
Hip fracture: Risk factors and outcomes.
Curr Osteoporos Rep, 1 (2003), pp. 78-85
[4.]
R. Van Balen, E.W. Steyerberg, J.J. Polder, T.L. Ribbers, J.D. Habbema, H.J. Cools.
Hip fracture in elderly patients: Outcomes for function, quality of life, and type of residence.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 390 (2001), pp. 231-243
[5.]
P.A. Cole, T. Miclau III., M. Bhandari.
What's new in Orthopaedic trauma?.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89 (2007), pp. 2560-2577
[6.]
M.J. Parker, K. Gurusamy.
Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4 (2006),
[7.]
C. Rogmark, O. Johnell.
Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients.
Acta Orthop, 77 (2006), pp. 359-367
[8.]
N.W.L. Schep, R.J. Heintjes, E.P. Martens, L.M.D. Van Dortmont, A.B. Van Vugta.
Retrospective analysis of factors infl uencing the operative result after percutaneous osteosynthesis of intracapsular femoral neck fractures.
Injury, 35 (2004), pp. 1003-1009
[9.]
S. Goh, M. Samuel, D.H. Ching Su, E. Chan, S. Yeo.
Meta-analysis comparing total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced neck of femur fracture.
J Arthroplasty, 24 (2009), pp. 400-406
[10.]
J.F. Keating, A. Grant, M. Masson, et al.
Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88 (2006), pp. 249
[11.]
K.J. Ravikumar, G. Marsh.
Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur–13 year results of a prospective randomised study.
Injury, 31 (2000), pp. 793
[12.]
R. Iorio, W.L. Healy, D.W. Lemos, D. Appleby, C.A. Lucchesi, K.J. Saleh.
Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: Outcomes and cost effectiveness.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 383 (2001), pp. 229-242
[14.]
F.J. Raia, C.B. Chapman, M.F. Herrera.
Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly?.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (2003), pp. 259
[15.]
B.C. Ong, S.G. Maurer, G.B. Aharonoff.
Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty: Functional outcome after femoral neck fracture at a minimum of thirty-six months of follow-up.
J Orthop Trauma, 16 (2002), pp. 317
[16.]
J.E. Gjertsen, S.A. Lie, J.M. Fevang, et al.
Total hip replacement after femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: Results of 8,577 fractures reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Acta Orthop Scand, 78 (2007), pp. 491-497
[17.]
B.P. Lee, D.J. Berry, W.S. Harmsen, F.H. Sim.
Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of an acute fracture of the femoral neck: Long-term results.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80 (1998), pp. 70-75
[18.]
V. Mishra, G. Thomas, T.F. Sibly.
Results of displaced subcapital fractures treated by primary total hip replacement.
Injury, 35 (2004), pp. 157-160
[19.]
G.E. Lewinnek, J.L. Lewis, R. Tarr, C. Compere, J. Zimmerman.
Dislocation after total hip replacement arthroplasties.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60 (1978), pp. 217-220
[20.]
S. Eggli, M. Pisan, M.E. Müller.
The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80 (1998), pp. 382-390
[21.]
Y. Kosashvili, N. Shasha, E. Olschewski, O. Safir, L. White, A. Gross, et al.
Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.
Can J Surg, 52 (2009), pp. 6-11
[22.]
A. González Della Valle, G. Slullitel, F. Piccaluga, E.A. Salvati.
The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 20 (2005), pp. 51-58
[23.]
A. González Della Valle, D.E. Padgett, E.A. Salvati.
Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 13 (2005), pp. 455-462
[24.]
D. Dennis, R. Kim, T. Thornill, R. Trousdale.
Basics of primary total hip arthroplasty: Preoperative and postoperative decisions.
Instr Course Lect, 58 (2009), pp. 143-156
[25.]
D.J. Berry, M. Von Knoch, C.D. Schleck, W.S. Harmsen.
Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87 (2005), pp. 2456-2463
[26.]
L.D. Dorr, M.C. Faugere, A.M. Mackel, T.A. Gruen, B. Bognar, H.H. Malluche.
Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.
Bone, 14 (1993), pp. 231-242
[27.]
S.B. Goodman, S.J. Adler, D.P. Fyhrie, D.J. Schurman.
The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 236 (1988), pp. 199-204
[28.]
R.L. Barrack.
Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: Implant design and orientation.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 11 (2003), pp. 89-99
[29.]
A. González Della Valle, B. Beksac, M.G. Peterson, E.A. Salvati.
A new technique to improve cup inclination accuracy in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Hip Int, 16 (2006), pp. 250-252
[30.]
N. Olmedo García, F. López Prats.
Nuevo método de planificación de prótesis totales de cadera no cementada.
Revista de Ortopedia y Traumatología, 46 (2002), pp. 46-51
[31.]
M.N. Charles, R.B. Bourne, J.R. Davey, A.S. Greenwald, B.F. Morrey, C.H. Roraback.
Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: The role of the 08 femoral offset restoration.
Instr Course Lect, 54 (2005), pp. 131-141
[32.]
C.S. Ranawat, J.A. Rodríguez.
Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 12 (1997), pp. 359-364
[33.]
J.M. Cuckler.
Limb length and stability in total hip replacement.
Orthopedics, 28 (2005), pp. 951-953
[34.]
W.J. Maloney, J.A. Keeney.
Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 19 (2004), pp. 108-110
[35.]
B. The, N. Verdonschot, J.R. Van Horn, P.M. Van Ooijen, R.L. Diercks.
Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: A randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties.
J Arthroplasty, 22 (2007), pp. 866-870
Copyright © 2010. Sociedad Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (SECOT). All rights reserved
