metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Oral Candida carriage of patients attending a dental clinic in Braga, Portugal
Información de la revista
Vol. 27. Núm. 3.
Páginas 119-124 (julio - septiembre 2010)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
4526
Vol. 27. Núm. 3.
Páginas 119-124 (julio - septiembre 2010)
Original
Acceso a texto completo
Oral Candida carriage of patients attending a dental clinic in Braga, Portugal
Colonización oral por Candida en pacientes que asisten a una clínica dental en Braga, Portugal
Visitas
4526
Margarida Martinsa, Mariana Henriquesa, Ana Paula Ribeiroa, Ricardo Fernandesa, V.. Vânia Gonçalvesa, A.. Álvaro Seabrab, Joana Azeredoa, R.. Rosário Oliveiraa,
Autor para correspondencia
roliveira@deb.uminho.pt

Corresponding author.
a IBB-Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal
b Clínica Dentária dos Congregados, Lda, Braga, Portugal
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Tablas (4)
Table 1. Primers sets and species-specific primers used in this study (as described by Kanbe et al.14)
Table 2. Colour of colonies on CHROMagar Candida medium for species identified by PCR
Table 3. Frequency of distribution of Candida species isolated and patients’ characteristics
Table 4. Number of patients with more than one Candida species
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Background

The ability of the Candida species to colonize surfaces can be considered as a risk factor for oral infection.

Aims

To establish oral Candida carriage in patients attending a dental clinic in Braga, Portugal.

Methods

A total of 97 patients were analysed. Swab samples were collected and directly cultured onto CHROMagar Candida. Representative yeasts were identified by polymerase chain reaction.

Results

From the samples analysed 54.6% (n=53) were Candida positive, and Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated species, accounting for 79% of all the species identified. Non-C. albicans Candida (NCAC) species recovered included Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, and Candida guilliermondii. There was a lack of association between the presence of C. albicans or NCAC species, and age, gender, or prostheses wearing in this population. In 17% of the cases (n=9), polymicrobial cultures, with two different Candida species, were identified.

Conclusions

This study shows a high Candida carriage rate among this population, thus pointing to the relevance of an accurate diagnostic approach in Candida species identification.

Keywords:
Candida
Polymicrobial cultures
Oral carriage
Braga—Portugal
Resumen
Antecedentes

La capacidad que poseen las diferentes especies de Candida de colonizar las superficies, puede ser considerada como un factor de riesgo para la infección oral.

Objetivos

Establecer la colonización oral por Candida en pacientes que asisten a una clínica dental en Braga, Portugal.

Métodos

Un total de 97 pacientes fueron estudiados. Se recogieron muestras bucales con hisopo y fueron cultivadas directamente en CHROMagar Candida. Las levaduras seleccionadas se identificaron mediante reacción en cadena de la polimerasa.

Resultados

De las muestras analizadas 54,6% (n=53) fueron positivas para Candida. Candida albicans fue la especie más frecuentemente aislada, representado el 79% de todas las especies identificadas. Las especies de Candida no-Candidaalbicans (CNCA) aisladas fueron Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis y Candida guilliermondii. En la población estudiada no se observó asociación entre la presencia de C. albicans o CNCA con la edad, el sexo o el uso de prótesis. En el 17% de los casos (n=9) se encontró una colonización mixta con dos especies de Candida.

Conclusiones

Este estudio muestra una alta incidencia de colonización por Candida en esta población; por lo tanto, se sugiere la necesidad de un diagnóstico preciso para la identificación de las especies de Candida.

Palabras clave:
Candida
Braga-Portugal
Colonización oral
Colonización mixta
Texto completo

Colonization of the oral cavity by Candida species was defined as the acquisition and maintenance of yeast cells without clinical signs. This process entails Candida species acquisition, growth, and removal.3

Within the yeast oral community, Candida albicans is the most frequently found (47–75% of the yeasts isolated).4 However, other yeast species have been increasingly identified, such as non-C. albicans Candida (NCAC) species (Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis, Candida dubliniensis, and Candida guilliermondii), Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Trichosporon species, and Yarrowia lipolytica.2,15,18,29

Although the presence of Candida species is not an indication of disease, the ability of the yeasts to overcome host clearance mechanisms and to colonize surfaces can be considered as a risk factor for oral infection. The balance between Candida colonization and candidiasis relies on the balance between pathogen characteristics (e.g. production of adhesins, secreted aspartyl proteinases), and host factors.12 Host local predisposing conditions comprise: (i) reduced saliva secretion, (ii) epithelial changes and local mucosal diseases, (iii) changes in commensal flora, (iv) high carbohydrate diet, and (v) denture wearing. Additionally, host systemic factors have also been associated with Candida oral colonization, and include: (i) age, (ii) tobacco smoking, (iii) endocrine disorders, including diabetes, hypothyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism, (iv) rheumatic diseases, (v) nutritional deficiencies (iron or folate deficiencies), (vi) immunosuppressive conditions, such as chemotherapy, deficiencies of humoral or cell-mediated immunity, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and (vii) drugs such as broad-spectrum antibiotics, and corticosteroids.1,4,10,18

To the authors’ knowledge, oral Candida carriage prevalence and aetiology studies have not yet been performed in the Portuguese population. Thus, the main objective of this study was to evaluate oral Candida carriage in patients attending a dental clinic in Braga, Portugal.

Patients and MethodsCandida type strains

For quality control purposes, the following Candida type strains were used in the identification procedures of Candida isolates: C. albicans CECT 1472, C. dubliniensis, strain provided by Biognostica from United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service, C. glabrata ATCC 2001, C. guilliermondii ATCC 6260, Candida kefyr ATCC 204093, C. krusei ATCC 6258, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, and C. tropicalis ATCC 750. These strains were maintained on Sabouraud dextrose agar.

Patients

Samples were collected from a total of 97 asymptomatic individuals (77 females and 20 males) attending a dental clinic in Braga, Portugal, over a 12-month period (May 2005–2006). Each of the potential subjects was informed of the aims and methods of the study, and anticipated benefits and potential risks, according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Data on patient age, oral hygiene habits, health status, medications, and prosthesis wearing were collected.

Sample collection

Samples were collected by passing a sterile swab (UNI-TER, MEUS, Padua, Italy) across the oral mucosa, tongue, hard palate, and gums, and replacing it in its sterile container tube. Samples were kept at 4°C and analysed within 24h.

Candida species identificationMedium for the primary isolation

CHROMagar Candida medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France) was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. The swab was inoculated into CHROMagar Candida medium rotating the swab head on the surface of the medium. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48h. Colony morphology and colour description were assigned in a standard manner by a single investigator. Presumptive species identification was performed according to Odds and Bernaerts.20 At least one colony exhibiting each colour was streaked into a new CHROMagar Candida plate and then cryopreserved.

Molecular identification

Yeast DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Lisbon, Portugal) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Genomic DNA content was determined by spectrophotometry readings at 260nm. Aliquots of 10μl were analysed by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose (Bio-Rad, Lisbon, Portugal) gel in 1×TBE buffer (Bio-Rad), and visualized with a UV transilluminator, after ethidium bromide (Bio-Rad) staining (0.5mg/ml).

To assess Candida speciation, a polymerase chain reaction method (PCR) previously described14 was followed. This method uses primer mixtures of the Candida DNA topoisomerase II genes (Table 1). In a multiplex PCR strategy it allows identification of C. albicans, C. guilliermondii, and C. parapsilosis using primer set A (Table 1) and C. dubliniensis, C. krusei, C. kefyr, and C. glabrata using primer set B (Table 1). C. tropicalis is identified in a third PCR reaction using a single pair of primers (Table 1).

Table 1.

Primers sets and species-specific primers used in this study (as described by Kanbe et al.14)

Primers sets  Target species  Forward primer sequence (name)  Reverse primer sequence (name)  Expected PCR product size (bp) 
Aa  C. albicans  5′-TTGAACATCTCCAGTTTCAAAGGT-3′ (CABF59)  5′-AGCTAAATTCATAGCAGAAAGC-3′ (CADBR125)  665 
  C. guilliermondii  5′-CCCAAAATCACAAAGCTCAAGT-3′ (CGLF41)  5′-TACGACTTGAAGTTGCGAATTG-3′ (CGLR61)  205 
  C. parapsilosis  5′-GGACAACATGACAAAAGTCGGCA-3′ (CPPIIF41)  5′-TTGTGGTGTAATTCTTGGGAG-3′ (CPPIIR69)  310 
Bb  C. dubliniensis  5′-AAATGGGTTTGGTGCCAAATTA-3′ (CDBF28)  5′-GTTGGCATTGGCAATAGCTCTA-3′ (CDBR110)  816 
  C. krusei  5′-GAGCCACGGTAAAGAATACACA-3′ (CKSF35)  5′-TTTAAAGTGACCCGGATACC-3′ (CKSR57)  227 
  C. kefyr  5′-CTTCCAAAGGTCAGAAGTATGTCC-3′ (CKFF35)  5′-CTTCAAACGGTCTGAAACCT-3′ (CKFR85)  532 
  C. glabrata  5′-CCCAAAAATGGCCGTAAGTATG-3′ (CGBF35)  5′-ATAGTCGCTACTAATATCACACC-3′ (CGBR103)  674 
Cc  C. tropicalis  5′-CTGGGAAATTATATAAGCAAGTT-3′ (CTPIIF36)  5′-TCAATGTACAATTATGACCGAGTT-3′ (CTPIIR121)  860 
a

In the original report,14 this primer set had the designation PsI.

b

In the original report,14 this primer set had the designation PsII.

c

In the original report,14 this primer set had the designation PsIII.

PCR amplification was performed in 25μl volume consisting of 1× PCR buffer (160mM (NH4)2SO4, 670mM Tris–HCl pH 8.8, 0.1% Tween 20, and 25mM MgCl2; Bioron, Porto, Portugal); dNTP mixture (200μM each; Bioron); primer mixture (300nM each); 1.25U Taq DNA polymerase (Bioron); and 10–100ng genomic DNA template; the remaining volume consisted of sterilized ultrapure water. PCR was carried out in a MyCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) under the following cycling conditions: 35 cycles of 30s at 94°C, 15s at 57°C, and 45s at 65°C, after a 10-min initial period of DNA denaturation and enzyme activation at 94°C. One blank reaction was performed simultaneously per every 10 tests run by replacing the template DNA by sterilized ultrapure water. DNA from type strains was also included in each reaction as positive and negative controls.

An aliquot of 15μl of each PCR product was analysed by electrophoresis in a 1.2% agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer. Fragments were visualized by ethidium bromide staining (0.5mg/ml) with a UV transilluminator. The size of the amplified DNA fragments was determined by comparison with a 100-bp DNA marker (Bioron).

All isolates whose presumptive identification in CHROMagar Candida did not correspond to the molecular identification were re-tested by two independent researchers in a blind assay.

Statistical analysis

CHROMagar Candida medium sensitivity was calculated as: [No. of true positives×100/(No. of true positives+No. of false negatives)], and specificity as: [No. of true negatives×100/(No. of true negatives+No. of false positives)]. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism, version 5.00 software for Windows. Data were analysed using two-tailed chi-square test or Fischer test to measure association between Candida species distribution within groups. A statistical confidence interval of 95% was established.

ResultsCandida species identification

Presumptive identification of yeasts clinical isolates was based on their colour on CHROMagar Candida medium. Samples were processed in parallel with C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis type strains that presented the expected colours on CHROMagar Candida medium: green, pink, and blue, respectively.

For each culture, representative isolates were identified by PCR using Candida specific primers pairs for the genomic sequences of DNA topoisomerase II gene (Table 1).14 Reference DNA strain was included in each assay as control. DNA of C. albicans (Fig. 1A, lane 1), C. guilliermondii (Fig. 1A, lane 3), and C. parapsilosis (Fig. 1A, lane 4) were amplified using primer set A (Table 1). Primer set B (Table 1) allowed identification of C. glabrata (Fig. 1B, lane 2), C. dubliniensis, C. krusei, and C. kefyr reference strains (data not shown). Finally, the set of primers C (Table 1) allowed identification of C. tropicalis reference strain (Fig. 1C, lane 5). For all Candida species the amplicon size obtained (Fig. 1) was as expected (Table 1). Clinical isolate identification was based on the comparison of size of the amplified DNA products (assessed by the DNA ladder) with the respective type strain PCR product. Fig. 1 shows an example of the identification of an isolate of C. albicans (lane 6), C. glabrata (lane 7), C. guilliermondii (lane 8), C. parapsilosis (lane 9), and C. tropicalis (lane 10).

Fig. 1.

Candida species-specific amplification of DNA topoisomerase II fragments. Genomic DNA was amplified using different sets of species-specific primers (from A to C), in accordance with Table 1. Lanes: M, 100-bp DNA marker and their molecular size in bp is indicated in the left margin; 1. C. albicans CECT 1472; 2. C. glabrata ATCC 2001; 3. C. guilliermondii ATCC 6260; 4. C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019; 5. C. tropicalis ATCC 750; 6–10. Example of clinical isolates of each species; 11. Blank. C. dubliniensis, C. krusei ATCC6258, and C. kefyr ATCC 204093 identification was omitted for simplicity. Arrows on the right indicate molecular weight of the amplified products.

(0,19MB).

CHROMagar Candida phenotypic characteristics of the Candida species identified by PCR are specified in Table 2. As expected, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis did not present a distinguishable colour in this medium. Using PCR as a standard method, and considering the CHROMagar Candida identifying colours claimed by the manufacturer, CHROMagar Candida sensitivity and specificity for C. albicans were found to be 97.9% and 83.3%, respectively. For C. tropicalis CHROMagar Candida sensitivity was 66.7%, and specificity 100%.

Table 2.

Colour of colonies on CHROMagar Candida medium for species identified by PCR

Species  Colony colour
  Green  Blue  Pink 
C. albicans  48  – 
C. parapsilosis  –  – 
C. glabrata  –  – 
C. tropicalis  – 
C. guilliermondii  –  – 
Unidentified  – 
Candida species carriage

From the 97 patients evaluated, 53 were identified as oral Candida carriers: 81.1% were females (n=43), and 18.9% males (n=10), with ages ranging from 28 to 91 years old (mean=61 and median=62 years old). Denture wearers accounted for 84.9% of the individuals (n=45).

C. albicans was identified in 79% of the samples, being the predominant Candida species. Additionally, C. parapsilosis comprised 6.5% of the isolates, followed by C. glabrata (4.8%), C. tropicalis (3.2%), and C. guilliermondii (1.6%). Five percent of the CHROMagar Candida positive samples (Table 2) were not identified. The distribution of Candida isolates within gender, and age groups is presented in Table 3. There was no association between C. albicans or NCAC species carriage within (i) gender (P=0.7), (ii) the age groups defined (P=0.83), or (iii) denture wearing (P=1).

Table 3.

Frequency of distribution of Candida species isolated and patients’ characteristics

Patient characteristicsSpeciesa frequency, % (n)
C. albicansNCAC species
C. parapsilosis  C. glabrata  C. tropicalis  C. guilliermondii  Unidentified 
Gender             
Female  80 (40)  6 (3)  4 (2)  4 (2)  0 (0)  6 (3) 
Male  75 (9)  8.3 (1)  8.3 (1)  0 (0)  8.3 (1)  0 (0) 
Age (years)
≤54  82.6 (19)  4.3 (1)  4.3 (1)  4.3 (1)  0 (0)  4.3 (1) 
55–79  75.9 (22)  6.9 (2)  3.4 (1)  3.4 (1)  3.4 (1)  6.9 (2) 
≥80  80 (8)  10 (1)  10 (1)  0 (0)  0 (0)  0 (0) 
a

PCR identification

Seventeen percent of the individuals (n=9) presented more than one Candida species per sample (Table 4). These individuals (seven females, two males) had a mean age of 58 years old (range=38–88 years old). The percentage of patients wearing denture in this sub-population (88.9%) was similar to that observed in the population studied.

Table 4.

Number of patients with more than one Candida species

Speciesa  Patients 
C. albicansC. glabrata 
C. albicansC. tropicalis 
C. albicansC. parapsilosis 
C. albicans–unidentified 
C. parapsilosisC. guilliermondii 
a

PCR identification.

Discussion

Microbiological testing in the field of oral medicine facilitates diagnosis, choice of therapy, treatment assessment, and risk evaluation.6 This study focused on diagnostics and risk evaluation.

The diagnostic approach used herein included a primary isolation on a chromogenic medium (CHROMagar Candida) followed by Candida species identification using a previously described PCR method.14 The CHROMagar Candida phenotypic characteristics of the Candida species identified by PCR are specified in Table 2. In comparison with PCR, there was lower sensitivity and specificity of CHROMagar Candida in the identification of C. tropicalis, and of sensitivity regarding C. albicans, also described by other authors.27 In fact, the low sensitivity shown by C. tropicalis to CHROMagar Candida (66.7%) is due to the fact that one isolate further identified as C. tropicalis exhibited green colour (Table 2), instead of the characteristic blue colour. C. tropicalis isolates developing dark pink,28 lavender,19,27 and white colours.27 on CHROMagar Candida have also been reported. Regarding C. albicans, two isolates that developed green colour on CHROMagar Candida were not identified as C. albicans (Table 2). In addition, one of the isolates, further identified as C. albicans, developed pink colour on CHROMagar Candida. These colour variations are in accordance with literature reports showing that C. albicans isolates can develop atypical colours in CHROMagar Candida, which includes pink,25 white,27 blue, or lavender.19 It should be noted that in the same plates containing these atypical strains, isolates of C. albicans and C. tropicalis with the expected colour phenotypes were also present.

Additionally, three yeast isolates were not identified by the PCR method using specific primers for the most common species (Table 2). A review of the literature reporting yeast species frequently isolated from the oral cavity,18 and colours developed by Candida species in CHROMagar Candida,20 suggest that the unidentified isolate developing green colour may be a Trichosporon species, and that the pink isolates could be Candida famata, Candida inconspicua, Candida lusitaniae, Candida norvegensis, Candida pelliculosa, or S. cerevisiae.

Results presented herein provide evidence that CHROMagar Candida medium fails to identify some yeast isolates, and that species identification should be supported by other methods, such as molecular characterization. Nevertheless, this medium does facilitate the recognition of polymicrobial species in cultures, as exemplified in Table 4.

The analysis of epidemiological literature on recovery of Candida species from the oral cavity is not clear concerning factors determining colonization. The reasons for such variability may include differing patient selection criteria, collection data periods, geographic region in which the patients live, sampling collection methods, and methodologies used for sample analysis.

In the present study, the prevalence of yeasts isolated was 54.6%, and between 41% and 67% in previous studies.2,7,9,17,29 However, due to the irregular distribution of Candida in the oral cavity,26 it must be recognized that swab samples can yield false-negative results, and thus a misclassification of true carriers as non–carriers. The Candida carriage frequency observed in this study was as follows: C. albicans > C. parapsilosis > C. glabrata > C. tropicalis > C. guilliermondii (Table 3), with NCAC species accounting for 21% of the total Candida species. The increased prevalence of C. parapsilosis within NCAC species was also observed in Portuguese patients with fungaemia,5 suggesting that C. parapsilosis might be an important fungal pathogen in Portugal. Various reports have also shown the prevalence of C. tropicalis,9C. parapsilosis,11C. famata,15 or C. glabrata17,29 over other NCAC species in the oral cavity, and such variation may be due to patient age or underlying disease.

The distribution of Candida isolates within gender and age groups are presented in Table 3. In the current study there was no association between C. albicans versus NCAC species carriage within gender or age as similarly observed by other authors.13 Nevertheless, NCAC species recovered from patients greater than 80 years old were exclusively C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata (Table 3), suggesting an association between this age group and these Candida species. An increase in the sample size would be necessary to establish a conclusive association between these two NCAC species and this age group.

Earlier studies scarcely report identification of mixed Candida cultures. However, in recent years, refinement in identification procedures has allowed discrimination of multi-Candida species in culture. As observed in other studies,2,8,16,17,24,29 the most common association found herein was C. albicans plus C. glabrata (Table 4). Nevertheless, the epidemiological data available report association between other Candida species.2,8,15–17,24,29 It is interesting to note that in the current study C. parapsilosis was the only NCAC species identified that was not exclusively co-isolated with other Candida species (Tables 3 and 4). In fact, other authors have reported that colonization with NCAC species, as the sole species, is lower when compared with its co-colonization with other species.17 This suggests that multi-species colonization may support maintenance of the oral NCAC population, contributing to increased interactions with molecules and surfaces in the oral cavity. In fact, it was shown that the intensity of colonization by more than one Candida species was higher than that observed with a single species.17 However, when host natural defences decay, benign colonization can develop into oral candidiasis, and antifungal therapy may support NCAC species emergence as the sole detectable species from oral lesions. In fact, results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Program21–23 show that Candida species resistance to fluconazole can be ranked as follows: C. glabrata, 16%; C. guilliermondii, 13%; C. tropicalis, 2.6%; C. parapsilosis, 2.4%; and C. albicans, 1.2%. These findings suggest that multi-species carriers might be at higher risk than the mono-species carriers, of developing oral candidiasis, and of being resistant to antifungal therapy.

According to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, the purpose of research involving human individuals is to advance our prophylactic, diagnostic, and therapeutic procedures for a better understanding of the aetiology of the disease. The present study fulfilled some of these aims. The diagnosis of oral Candida carriage prior to the presentation of clinical symptoms facilitates dental hygiene education for routine oral care, controlling of the spread of colonization through appropriate methods, and use of therapeutic approaches when indicated. Finally, the main observation that may contribute to a better understanding of Candida oral carriage is the high frequency of polymicrobial cultures encountered, which may present an increased risk of infection to patients, and require careful surveillance.

Author's declaration

Authors have nothing to declare.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Associate Professor Toshio Kanbe (Division of Molecular Mycology and Medicine, Centre for Neurological Diseases and Cancer, Nagoya Graduate School of Medicine, Japan) for critical discussion and advices on the PCR protocol. We also acknowledge Dr. Angel Gonzalez (Department of Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA) for Spanish language revision.

Margarida Martins was financially supported by a fellowship from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal (Contract SFRH/BD/28222/2006). This research was supported by FCT through the Project PPCDT/BIO/61112/2004.

References
[1]
A. Akpan, R. Morgan.
Oral candidiasis.
Postgrad Med J, 78 (2002), pp. 455-459
[2]
M. Belazi, A. Velegraki, A. Fleva, L. Papanaum, D. Baka, N. Daniilidou, D. Karamitsos.
Candidal overgrowth in diabetic patients: potential predisposing factors.
[3]
R.D. Cannon, W.L. Chaffin.
Oral colonization by Candida albicans.
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 10 (1999), pp. 359-383
[4]
R.D. Cannon, A.R. Holmes, A.B. Mason, B.C. Monk.
Oral Candida: clearance, colonization, or candidiasis?.
J Dent Res, 74 (1995), pp. 1152-1161
[5]
S. Costa-de-Oliveira, C. Pina-Vaz, D. Mendonça, R.A. Gonçalves.
A first Portuguese epidemiological survey of fungaemia in a university hospital.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 27 (2008), pp. 365-374
[6]
G. Dahlen.
Microbiological diagnostics in oral diseases.
Acta Odontol Scand, 64 (2006), pp. 164-168
[7]
T. Daniluk, G. Tokajuk, W. Stokowska, K. Fiedoruk, M. Sciepuk, M.L. Zaremba, et al.
Occurrence rate of oral Candida albicans in denture wearer patients.
Adv Med Sci, 51 (2006), pp. 77-80
[8]
A.N. Davies, S.R. Brailsford, D. Beighton.
Oral candidosis in patients with advanced cancer.
[9]
M.A. de Resende, L.V. de Sousa, R.C. de Oliveira, C.Y. Koga-Ito, J.P. Lyon.
Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of yeasts obtained from the oral cavity of elderly individuals.
Mycopathologia, 162 (2006), pp. 39-44
[10]
C.S. Farah, R.B. Ashman, S.J. Challacombe.
Oral candidosis.
Clin Dermatol, 18 (2000), pp. 553-562
[11]
R.H. Gonçalves, E.T. Miranda, J.E. Zaia, M.J. Giannini.
Species diversity of yeast in oral colonization of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus patients.
Mycopathologia, 162 (2006), pp. 83-89
[12]
M. Henriques, J. Azeredo, R. Oliveira.
Candida species adhesion to oral epithelium: factors involved and experimental methodology used.
Crit Rev Microbiol, 32 (2006), pp. 217-226
[13]
K. Ikebe, K. Morii, K. Matsuda, K. Hata, T. Nokubi.
Association of candidal activity with denture use and salivary flow in symptom-free adults over 60 years.
J Oral Rehabil, 33 (2006), pp. 36-42
[14]
T. Kanbe, T. Horii, T. Arishima, M. Ozeki, A. Kikuchi.
PCR-based identification of pathogenic Candida species using primer mixes specific to Candida DNA topoisomerase II genes.
Yeast, 19 (2002), pp. 973-989
[15]
C.L. Kleinegger, S.R. Lockhart, K. Vargas, D.R. Soll.
Frequency, intensity, species, and strains of oral Candida vary as a function of host age.
J Clin Microbiol, 34 (1996), pp. 2246-2254
[16]
G. Liguori, A. Lucariello, G. Colella, A. De Luca, P. Marinelli.
Rapid identification of Candida species in oral rinse solutions by PCR.
J Clin Pathol, 60 (2007), pp. 1035-1039
[17]
S.R. Lockhart, S. Joly, K. Vargas, J. Swails-Wenger, L. Enger, D.R. Soll.
Natural defenses against Candida colonization breakdown in the oral cavities of the elderly.
J Dent Res, 78 (1999), pp. 857-868
[18]
J.H. Meurman, E. Siikala, M. Richardson, R. Rautemaa.
Non-Candida albicans Candida yeasts of the oral cavity.
Communicating current research and educational topics and trends in applied microbiology. Microbiology book series, pp. 719-731
[19]
C.K. Murray, M.L. Beckius, J.A. Green, D.R. Hospenthal.
Use of chromogenic medium in the isolation of yeasts from clinical specimens.
J Med Microbiol, 54 (2005), pp. 981-985
[20]
F.C. Odds, R. Bernaerts.
CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species.
J Clin Microbiol, 32 (1994), pp. 1923-1929
[21]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema, D.L. Gibbs, V.A. Newell, J.F. Meis, I.M. Gould, et al.
Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance study, 1997 to 2005: an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing.
J Clin Microbiol, 45 (2007), pp. 1735-1745
[22]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema, D.L. Gibbs, V.A. Newell, K.P. Ng, A. Colombo, Global Antifungal Surveillance Group, et al.
Geographic and temporal trends in the isolation and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis: a global assessment from the ARTEMIS DISK antifungal surveillance program, 2001–2005.
J Clin Microbiol, 46 (2008), pp. 842-849
[23]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema, M. Mendez, C. Kibbler, P. Erzsebet, S.C. Chang, The Global Antifungal Surveillance Group, et al.
Candida guilliermondii, an opportunistic fungal pathogen with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole: geographic and temporal trends from the ARTEMIS DISK antifungal surveillance Program.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 3551-3556
[24]
Q.G. Qi, T. Hu, X.D. Zhou.
Frequency, species and molecular characterization of oral Candida in hosts of different age in China.
J Oral Pathol Med, 34 (2005), pp. 352-356
[25]
D.M. Saunte, L. Klingspor, S. Jalal, J. Arnau, M.C. Arendrup.
Four cases of Candida albicans infections with isolates developing pink colonies on CHROMagar Candida plates.
[26]
B.C. Webb, C.J. Thomas, M.D.P. Willcox, D.W.S. Harty, K.W. Knox.
Candida associated denture stomatitis. Aetiology and management: a review.
Aust Dent J, 43 (1998), pp. 45-50
[27]
B. Willinger, M. Manafi.
Evaluation of CHROMagar Candida for rapid screening of clinical specimens for Candida species.
Mycoses, 42 (1999), pp. 61-65
[28]
M. Yücesoy, S. Marol.
Performance of CHROMagar Candida and BIGGY agar for identification of yeast species.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2 (2003), pp. 8-15
[29]
M.L. Zaremba, T. Daniluk, D. Rozkiewicz, D. Cylwik-Rokicka, A. Kierklo, G. Tokajuk, et al.
Incidence rate of Candida species in the oral cavity of middle-aged and elderly subjects.
Adv Med Sci, 51 (2006), pp. 233-236
Copyright © 2010. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología
Opciones de artículo