covid
Buscar en
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad A new species of Psychodinae (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Argentina
Información de la revista
Vol. 85. Núm. 4.
Páginas 1061-1064 (diciembre 2014)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
1968
Vol. 85. Núm. 4.
Páginas 1061-1064 (diciembre 2014)
Open Access
A new species of Psychodinae (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Argentina
Una nueva especie de Psychodinae (Diptera: Psychodidae) de Argentina
Visitas
1968
Guillermo H. Omad
Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Ecología y Sistemática Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco. Sarmiento 849, 9200 Esquel, Chubut, Argentina.
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Abstract

A new species of Desmioza Enderlein, 1937 from Argentina is described: Desmioza biancae n.sp. Adults were collected with Malaise traps in the Nahuel Huapi National Park, in the Argentinean Patagonia. This is the third species of the genus described in the Andean region, Patagonian subregion. A dichotomous key for the identification of all known species of the genus is included.

Key words:
moth fly
Desmioza
dichotomous key
taxonomy
Patagonia
Resumen

Se describe una nueva especie de Desmioza Enderlein, 1937 de la Argentina: Desmioza biancae n.sp. Los adultos fueron colectados con trampas Malaise ubicadas en el Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapí, en la Patagonia argentina. Esta es la tercera especie del género descrita en la región Andina, subregión Patagónica. Se incluye una clave dicotómica para la identificación de todas las especies conocidas del género.

Palabras clave:
sicódinos
Desmioza
clave dicotómica
taxonomía
Patagonia
Texto completo
Introduction

The genus Desmioza was proposed by Enderlein (1937) to include a previously described species by Tonnoir (1929): Pericoma edwardsi from Bariloche, Argentina. Subsequently Quate (1963) treated Desmioza as a synonym of Pericoma Walker and mentioned that some of the unique characters of Desmioza species were “of no more than specific rank”. Then, Quate and Brown (2004) re-established Desmioza as a valid genus, included D. edwardsi (Tonnoir), and transferred to Desmioza another species described by Tonnoir (1929): Pericoma speciosa; they also described for the first time the male of the latter species. Desmioza is distinguished by the following characteristics: head with same coloration above and below eyes, eyes separated, interocular suture present, eye bridge with 3 facet rows, antennae shorter than wing width, flagellomeres fusiform or barrel shaped, simple unbranched ascoids, wing with infuscate patterns, costa without second costal node, R5 ending beyond the wing tip, a spur at the base of R3, anterior gonocoxal apodemes expanded, plate like, paramere absent, and aedeagus asymmetrical (Quate & Brown, 2004). The 2 species described before and the one described here have been recorded for the southern part of South America, more specifically from Patagonian Argentina. In this paper I describe a new species of Desmioza, based on male and female characteristics, from Nahuel Huapi National Park, Río Negro province, Argentina.

Materials and methods

Sampling sites. Specimens were captured with Malaise traps located on the west side of the Nahuel Huapi National Park (NHNP). This National Park is one of the biggest in Argentina, with an extension of approximately 709.886 hectares, and extends between the provinces of Río Negro and Neuquén. According to Morrone (2004, 2006) this area is located in the Subandean Patagonia province, Andean region, Patagonian Subregion.

Specimen preparation. Specimens were macerated with hot 10% sodium hydroxide, dehydrated, cleared with clove oil, and mounted on a slide in Canada balsam. Specimens were observed using a Leica MZ6 magnifying lens and a Leitz wetzlar Dialux ocular microscope with micrometer. Drawings were made with the aid of a Canon Powershot® A590 camera, and digitally processed with Inkscape 0.48.4. General terminology for Diptera follows that of McAlpine (1981), while specific morphological terminology for Psychodidae follows Quate and Brown (2004) and Moya et al. (2012). Biogeographical regions are in accordance with Morrone (2001, 2004). The holotype and some paratypes were deposited in the collection of Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina (MLPA).

Description

Desmioza biancae sp. nov. Figs. 1-14

Figures 1-9.

Desmioza biancae Omad, sp. nov., male (holotype). 1, head, frontal view; 2, palpus; 3, cibarium, frontal view; 4, scape, pedicel, and first flagellomere; 5, antenna, last 7 flagellomeres; 6, wing. 7-9, male terminalia; 7, terminalia in part showing the gonocoxites, aedeagus, basiphallus, and anterior gonocoxal apodemes; 8, gonostylus; 9, epandrium. All measurements in mm.

(0,14MB).
Figures 10-14.

Desmioza biancae Omad, sp. nov., female. 10, head frontal view; 11, palpus; 12, antenna complete; 13, wing; 14, postabdomen. All measurements in mm.

(0,15MB).

Male holotype (Fig. 1-8). Head (Fig. 1). About as long as broad (without considering mouthparts), piriform in frontal view; supra-ocular frontal and vertex area 3.1 times higher than eye-bridge width, with spaced alveoli all over the vertex surface, except for a slightly bare band over the interocular suture. Eyes separated by 2.1 facet diameters; interocular suture V-shaped, but slightly interrupted in center; eye-bridge with 3 facet rows. Front below eyes broad with a broad seta alveoli patch emarginated below, separated in the middle by a band without alveoli. Palpus (Fig. 2) about as long as the head width. Palpal segment proportion: 1.0: 1.3: 1.1: 1.6; mouthparts short, 0.15 times as high as the head. Cibarium as figured (Fig. 3). Labella bulbous, with shorts spiniform pointed setae on the distal margin. Antenna short, 0.3 times as long as the wing. Scape 2.1 times longer than wide, and 3 times longer than the globular pedicel (Fig. 4). Antenna with 14 flagellomeres, flagellomeres 1-8 flask shaped, 9-11 barrel shaped; distal 3 reduced (Fig. 5). Ascoids present, unbranched, very small. Last flagellomere with apiculus as long as node (Fig. 5).

Thorax. Wing (Fig. 6) 2.6 times longer than broad with infuscate pattern, with small, faint spots at vein tips, base of R2+3 and R5, and radial and medial forks; radial fork sligthly basal to medial fork; base of R5 well distal of base of M3. Sc short ending before the base of R1. R5 ending beyond wing apex.

Male genitalia (Fig. 7-8). Aedeagus composed of 2 dark, sclerotized arms; one shorter than the other, reaching about 0.66 its length, wide at middle then tapering to the tip. The other arm slightly sinuous towards the tip. Anterior gonocoxal apodeme plate-like, nearly triangular, without touching at middle. Gonocoxite broad, with the internal margin concave and the external margin rounded, 1.1 times longer than the gonostylus, with seta alveoli all over its surface (Fig. 7). Gonostylus bilobed, with a dorsal lobe that is broad and rounded at the apex, and small bumps like “teeth” on the bottom, extending to the ventral lobe which is smaller, straight and ends in triangular shape as a “peak climber” (Fig. 8). Basiphallus long, 1.6 times longer than gonostylus, broad at base, with a circular foramen. Epandrium naked with anterior margin straight, posterolateral angles rounded, posterior margin slightly cut at middle in a triangular way, leaving the dome rounded tergum 10 visible. Sternum 10 tongue-shaped, longer than broad, with rounded apex. Surtylus long, 1.2 times longer than the basiphallus, with strong spiniform setae on inner margin and some setae alveoli all over its surface (Fig. 9). With 1 apical clavate tenaculum.

Measurements. Head height: 0.48, width: 0.47; mouthparts length (from clypeus inferior border to apex of labellum): 0.07; palpus length: 0.46; antenna length: 0.72; wing length: 2.21, width: 0.83; epandrium length: 0.12; surtylus length: 0.22; tenaculum length: 0.04; gonostylus length: 0.12; gonocoxite length: 0.13; aedeagus length (short arm): 0.10, aedeagus length (longer arm): 0.20. All measures are given in mm.

Female. (Fig. 10-14) Similar to male except for the following characteristics. Eyes separated by 3 facet diameters (Fig. 10). Palpus longer than the male (Fig. 11), about 1.2 times longer than the head height, fourth segment longer than others and striated. Palpal segment proportion: 1.0: 1.1: 1.2: 2.2. Wing (Fig. 12) and antenna (Fig. 13) as figured. Postabdomen (Fig. 14). Subgenital plate nearly triangular. Anterior margin reinforced, with micropubescense and setose hypovalve; hypovalve with the external margin nearly straight, leaving an almost triangular space in the middle. Both lobes with rounded apex. Chitinous arch extending beyond the anterior limit of the pubescence hypovalve and ending in a rounded apex. A small and irregular genital pouch with some clear pores in its surface. Genital ducts with longitudinal and lateral struts well developed (Fig. 14). Cercus long and tappered.

Measurements. Head height: 0.46, width: 0.43; mouthparts length (from clypeus inferior border to apex of labellum): 0.11; palpus length: 0.55; antenna length: 0.81; wing length: 2.74, wing width: 0.94; subgenital plate length (from anterior margin to apex of hypovalve): 0.15; cercus length: 0.38. All measures are given in mm.

Taxonomic summary

Material examined. Holotype: Mallín Los Patos, Nahuel Huapi National Park. 10–20.xii.2006, Malaise trap. Coordinates: 41°15'48.6” S, 71°17'50.3” W. 1 020m asl. Garré and Montes de Oca Leg. (MLPA). Paratypes 5 ♂, 4 ♀ same data as the holotype (MLPA). Other specimens studied: 16 males and 28 females, same data as the holotype.

Etymology. The epithet biancae is in honor to the beloved mother of the author Blanca Alegría de Omad.

Remarks

Desmioza biancae differs from the others known species of Desmioza by the unusual shape of the bilobed gonostylus and by the shape of the basiphallus. It has some similarities with D. edwardsi in the shape of gonocoxites and in the shape of the aedeagus, composed of 2 arms (one short and one long). However, the shape of the gonostylus in D. edwardsi differs from D. biancae, as the former presents a strongly curved gonostylus, with a series of small hairs in the most distal part (Quate and Brown, 2004). The female of D. biancae differs from other females previously described by the form of the hypovalve and the genital pouch shape. The lateral strout and the genital ducts of Desmioza biancae share some similarities with Desmioza speciosa (Tonnoir), but differs from it (from D. speciosa) by the characters mentioned above. Desmioza includes (with the new species herein described), only 3 species, all described for the Andean region of Argentina. Currently, the genus is considered endemic to this region; however, it should be noted that all species have overlapping distributions, and in most collections are found associated to Nothofagus forests.

Key to species of Desmioza.

  • 1.

    Male with gonostylus single, longer than gonocoxite and C-shaped; female with dark arrow shape in center of membranous plate……D. edwardsi (Tonnoir)

    - Male with gonostylus bifurcate……2

  • 2.

    Gonostylus with the ventral appendage short and strongly curved, with subapical protusion bearing 5-6 bristles; dorsal appendage black, similar shape as ventral, with spur at distal one third without bristles; female with dark bar between genital ducts……D. speciosa (Tonnoir)

    - Gonostylus with ventral appendage thin, straight, ending in a peak, with posterior edge serrated; dorsal appendage thick, ending in blunt tip, with small projections ventrally; female with a small and irregular genital pouch with some clear pores on its surface……D. biancae sp. nov.

Acknowledgments

This paper was partially founded by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnicas (CONICET). Gratitude is extended to all the people who worked on the project Darwinian Initiative “Capacity building for biodiversity studies of freshwater insects in Argentina” and also thanks to the staff of the División de Entomología, Museo de La Plata.

Literature cited
[Enderlein, 1937]
G. Enderlein.
Klassification der Psychodidae (Dipt.).
Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1936 (1937), pp. 81-112
[McAlpine, 1981]
J.F. McAlpine.
Morphology and terminology, adults.
Manual of Nearctic Diptera, pp. 2-63
[Morrone, 2001]
J.J. Morrone.
Biogeografía de América Latina y el Caribe, Manuales y Tesis SEA, (2001), pp. 148
[Morrone, 2004]
J.J. Morrone.
Panbiogeografía, componentes bióticos y zonas de transición.
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 48 (2004), pp. 149-162
[Morrone, 2006]
J.J. Morrone.
Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the Caribbean Islands based on panbiogeographic and cladistic analyses of the entomofauna.
Annual Review of Entomology, 51 (2006), pp. 467-494
[Moya-Arévalo et al., 2012]
R.H. Moya-Arévalo, S. Ibáñez-Bernal, M.T. Suárez-Landa.
First record of Didicrum Enderlein (Diptera: Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from the Northern Andes bioregion, with the description of a new species.
Zootaxa, 3577 (2012), pp. 80-88
[Quate, 1963]
L.W. Quate.
Review of G. Enderlein' s non-Holarctic genera of Psychodidae and description of a new species (Diptera).
Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 115 (1963), pp. 181-196
[Quate and Brown, 2004]
L.W. Quate, B.V. Brown.
Revision of Neotropical Setomimini (Diptera: Psychodidae: Psychodinae).
Contributions in Science, 500 (2004), pp. 1-117
[Tonnoir, 1929]
A.L. Tonnoir.
Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile, pt. 1. Fascicle I, Psychodidae, British Museum (Natural History), (1929), pp. 32
Copyright © 2014. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Opciones de artículo