metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition) A new assessment method of posttraumatic psychiatric pathology
Información de la revista
Vol. 8. Núm. 4.
Páginas 245-250 (octubre - diciembre 2015)
Visitas
2646
Vol. 8. Núm. 4.
Páginas 245-250 (octubre - diciembre 2015)
Letter to the Editor
Acceso a texto completo
A new assessment method of posttraumatic psychiatric pathology
Un nuevo método de valoración de la enfermedad psiquiátrica postraumática
Visitas
2646
Julio A. Guijaa,b,
Autor para correspondencia
julioaguija@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Antonio Medinac, Lucas Ginerb, Carlos Lledód, Antonio Maríne, Juan José Arechederraf, José Ginerb
a Instituto de Medicina Legal de Sevilla, Consejería de Justicia e Interior, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain
b Departamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
c Departamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
d Audiencia Provincial de Sevilla, Sección Cuarta, Sevilla, Spain
e Audiencia Provincial de Cádiz, Sección Segunda, Cádiz, Spain
f Instituto de Investigaciones Neuropsiquiátricas Dr. López Ibor, Madrid, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Proposal for the ICD-10 disorder classification based on the organisation of psychiatric syndromes established by the Spanish Official Gazette (BOE).
Texto completo
Dear Editor,

In 2011 there were 94,920 petty offences for lesions, 136,907 crimes against people's life, integrity and liberty,1 11,347 seriously wounded individuals and 104,280 individuals with serious injuries caused by traffic accidents.2 Consequently, 347,454 individuals presented physical and/or mental lesions. Posttraumatic mental disorder (PTMD) is a disorder triggered by an external agent (of physical or mental nature) that can involve legal and economic repercussions. For legal assessment of PTMD, you need to know the type of lesion, its seriousness, the treatments received, its progression, time periods required for recovery and, principally, the individual's functionality once “lesion stability” is achieved; that is, the situation in which there is no possibility of improvement because all the scientifically accepted treatments have been applied. This implies that the both the expert and psychiatric reports have to focus on the diagnosis, on the seriousness and on the repercussion that the disability causes in the individual's life. There are some unique characteristics in PTMD3: (1) it can be produced with or without brain injury; (2) experiencing the trauma can trigger or worsen symptoms, and (3) there can be disproportion among trauma, symptoms and functionality.

To unify the parameters used to assess injuries, the use of required scales has been spreading. Although these scales may be imperfect and incomplete for quantifying personal injuries,4 they have approached functionality, attempting to make a separation from the symptoms.5 Among European Union members, until 1995 only Belgium, Spain, Greece and Portugal applied official scales for classifying or quantifying personal injury from road accidents.6 The other countries have used non-official scales, such as Mélennec's7 French scale, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health8 or the “permanent impairment” guide published by the American Medical Association.9 In Spain, what are called psychiatric syndromes, as well as their scoring, are currently covered by a scale including the stipulations of Law 34/2003 (on modification and adaptation to Community legislation of private insurance companies),10 Community regulations on private insurance legislation, and Legislative Royal Decree 8/2004, of 29 October (approving the restated text of the law on civil responsibility and insurance in motor vehicle circulation.11 There are several difficulties involved in applying this scale. Firstly, the terminology used does not conform to current psychiatric classifications (the International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-10 or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition [DSM-5]12,13). Secondly, the scale omits the specification of the procedure for establishing a score range (except in en el organic personality disorder). Finally, the margins are narrow and the score is limited with respect to mental sequelae14 (except for, once again, organic personality disorder). Given all of the preceding, a single sequela can receive a different score depending on the experience and knowledge of the individual examining the patient.

Consequently, we present a PTMD scoring procedure that adapts the current scale to the ICD-10 nosology12 and specifies an assessment method that unifies PTMD scoring. This procedure does not involve a modification of the present scale; it represents a clearer, more unified use of it.

Methods

A work group was established, consisting of a set of experts (2 judges appointed by the General Council of the Judiciary and 4 psychiatrists appointed by the Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health, of which 2 were, in addition, medical pathologists). This work group prepared an initial draft procedure, which different professional forums then discussed. An example is Documentos Córdoba 2011, a meeting of law professionals (judges, public prosecutors and lawyers) and psychiatrists, published by the Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health.15 There were several presentations about the legal and psychiatric need to unify the traffic scoring scale, discussing the proposal presented by the work group. This proposal was unanimously accepted and then a small legal modification was incorporated. Later, following the same method, it was presented at the 15th National Psychiatry Congress (Oviedo, 2011), at a monographic meeting (Sevilla, 2011), in collaboration with the Centre for Excellence in Forensic Research in Andalucía, about the subject with 25 forensic doctors from different autonomous communities in Spain, at which the authors (judges, psychiatrists and psychiatrists-forensic doctors) presented the reasons for the procedure; and, finally, at the 16th National Psychiatry Congress (Bilbao, 2012).

ProcedureEvaluation prior to scoring

Expert evaluation should be based on “lesion stability”, the time when the lesion or mental disorder does not progress positively in spite of the treatment prescribed. Childhood psychiatric signs and symptoms need to be framed, for their evaluation, in the overall attitude of the parents in the face of the causal traumatic facts.

Diagnoses: concordance with the current scale

As indicated previously, the ICD-10 diagnoses12 referring to mental diseases are linked to the psychiatric syndromes included in the official scale. To do so, the scale subsections would be changed to the current diagnoses (Table 1). To make application possible, the diagnosis has to fulfil the same criteria as those gathered in the ICD-10.12

Table 1.

Proposal for the ICD-10 disorder classification based on the organisation of psychiatric syndromes established by the Spanish Official Gazette (BOE).

Psychiatric syndromes established by the BOE  Disorders to include based on the ICD-10 
Personality disorders  Organic disorders 
  F04 Organic amnesic syndrome not induced by alcohol or other psychoactive substances 
Postconcussional syndrome  F07.0 Organic personality disorder 
  F07.2 Postconcussional syndrome 
Organic personality disorders  Others 
  F06.0 Organic hallucinosis 
  F06.1 Organic catatonic disorder 
  F06.2 Organic delusional (schizophrenia-like) disorder 
  F06.3 Organic mood disorder 
  F06.4 Organic anxiety disorder 
  F06.5 Organic dissociative disorder 
  F06.6 Organic emotional labile disorder 
  F06.7 Mild cognitive disorder 
Mood disorder  Mood disorder 
  F32 Depressive episodes 
  F33 Recurrent depressive disorder 
  F34.1 Dysthymia 
  F34.8 Other persistent mood (affective) disorders 
  F34.9 Unspecified persistent mood (affective) disorder 
  F38 Other mood (affective) disorders 
  F39 Unspecified mood (affective) disorder 
Neurotic disorders  Anxiety disorders 
  F40 Phobic anxiety disorders 
  F41 Other anxiety disorders 
  F43 Reactions to severe stress, and adjustment disorders 
  F44 Dissociative (conversion) disorders 
  F45 Somatoform disorders 
  F48 Other neurotic disorders 
  F50.4 Bing eating in other psychological disturbances 
  F50.5 Vomiting in other psychological disturbances 
  F51 Nonorganic sleep disorders 
  F52 Nonorganic sexual dysfunction 
  F54 Psychological or behavioural factors in disorders or diseases classified elsewhere 
  F59 Unspecified behavioural disorders associated with physiological dysfunctions and with somatic factors 
  F62 Enduring personality changes not attributable to brain damage or disease 
  F68 Other disorders of adult personality and behaviour 
  F69 Unspecified disorder of adult personality and behaviour 
  F91 Dissocial disorders 
  F92 Mixed dissocial and emotional disorders 
  F93 Emotional disorders with onset normally in childhood 
  F94.8 Other social behaviour disorders in childhood and adolescence 
  F94.9 Unspecified disorder of social behaviour in childhood and adolescence 
  F95.1 Chronic motor or vocal tic disorder 
  F95.9 Unspecified tic disorder 
  F98 Other behavioural or emotional disorders with onset usually in childhood and adolescence 
  F99 Unspecified mental disorder mental 
Aggravations  F00 Dementia in Alzheimer's disease 
  F02 Dementia in diseases classified elsewhere 
  F03 Unspecified Dementia 
  F05 Delirium not induced by alcohol or other psychotropic substances 
  F10 Mental and behavioural disorders due to alcohol consumption 
  F11 Mental and behavioural disorders due to opioid consumption 
  F12 Mental and behavioural disorders due to cannabinoid consumption 
  F13 Mental and behavioural disorders due to the consumption of sedatives or 
  hypnotics 
  F14 Mental and behavioural disorders due to cocaine consumption 
  F15 Mental and behavioural disorders due to the consumption of other stimulants (including caffeine) 
  F16 Mental and behavioural disorders due to consumption of hallucinogens 
  F17 Mental and behavioural disorders due to tobacco consumption 
  F18 Mental and behavioural disorders due to the consumption of volatile solvents 
  F19 Mental and behavioural disorders due to the consumption of multiple drugs or psychotropic substances 
  F20 Schizophrenia 
  F21 Schizotypal disorder 
  F22 Persistent delusional disorder 
  F24 Induced delusional idea disorder 
  F25 Schizoaffective disorders 
  F28 Other nonorganic psychotic disorders 
  F29 Unspecified nonorganic psychosis 
  F30 Manic episode 
  F31 Bipolar disorder 
  F33 Recurrent depressive disorder 
  F34 Persistent mood (affective) disorders 
  F38 Other mood (affective) disorders 
  F42 Obsessive-compulsive disorder 
  F50.0 Anorexia nervosa 
  F50.1 Atypical anorexia 
  F50.2 Bulimia nervosa 
  F50.3 Atypical bulimia nervosa 
  F53 Mental and behavioural disorders in the puerperium not classified elsewhere 
  F55 Abuse of substances that do not produce dependency 
  F60 Specific personality disorders 
  F61 Mixed disorders and other personality disorders 
  F63 Habit and impulse control disorders 
  F64 Sexual identity disorders 
  F65 Disorders of sexual preference 
  F66 Psychological and behavioural disorders of sexual development and orientation 
  F70 Mild mental retardation 
  F71 Moderate mental retardation 
  F72 Severe mental retardation 
  F73 Profound mental retardation 
  F78 Other mental retardation 
  F79 Unspecified mental retardation 
  F80 Specific developmental disorders of speech and language 
  F81 Specific developmental disorders of scholastic skills 
  F82 Specific developmental disorders of psychomotor function 
  F83 Mixed specific developmental disorder 
  F84 Pervasive developmental disorders 
  F88 Other disorders of psychological development 
  F89 Unspecified disorder of psychological development 
  F90 Hyperkinetic disorders 
  F94.0 Elective mutism 
  F94.1 Reactive attachment disorder in childhood 
  F94.2 Disinhibited attachment disorder in childhood 
  F95.2 Combined motor and vocal tic disorder de tics (Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome) 
  F95.8 Other tic disorders 
Source: Spanish Official Gazette (BOE, Boletín oficial del estado)10,11 and World Health Organisation.12

When a diagnosis of mental sequela had occurred previously, it will be recorded as aggravation, and symptom intensity and degree of disability will be calculated as the difference resulting from the mental sequelae before and after the event.

Indication of the severity of the symptoms

The severity of the posttraumatic suffering will be evaluated according to the number and intensity (temporal frequency) of the symptoms present reported in the clinical history and examination, always based on the nosographic criterion description established for each entity in the ICD-10 international classification.12 To diagnose with this classification, the subject evaluated has to fulfil the minimum criteria specified for each entity. Starting from these minimums, the type of severity will be indicated in the following gradients:

  • -

    Moderate: up to 40 points. Subject fulfils the minimum number of required criteria established in the ICD-10 for diagnosis.

  • -

    Intense: up to 60 points. Exceeds the symptoms by 20% over the minimums required for this diagnosis.

  • -

    Very intense: up to 80 points. Exceeds the symptoms by 40% over the minimums required for this diagnosis and/or 1 of them is extremely severe.

  • -

    Extreme: 100 points. Has the maximum number of symptoms described for this diagnosis and/or several of them are extremely severe.

The category “Mild” would be eliminated, given that it supposes the existence of isolated psychopathological symptoms and/or indeterminate and diffuse mental distress that do not cause a decrease in the subject's functional capacities, with normal activities being maintained.

Degree of disability produced by the symptoms present

Disability means the difficulties for a subject's autonomous life and/or the negative repercussions on their working life.16 In this section we assume the specifications of Royal Decree 1971/1999, of 23 December, on the procedure for recognising, declaring and rating the degree of disability,17 and its posterior correction.18

Psychiatric suffering

The concept of psychiatric suffering is incorporated into the scale. As indicated by the consensus group, such suffering should consider not only the severity of the sequelae but also the degree of disability that the illness produced or aggravated means for that subject. Consequently, psychiatric suffering would be the result of adding the scores for symptom intensity and disability and dividing both [the sum] by 2 (PS=[pS+pD]/2, where PS is the psychiatric suffering; pS, the points for severity of the disorder; and pD, the points for disability). In posttraumatic aggravation of pre-existing mental illness, it is necessary to obtain the difference of both scores, from the period before to that after the traumatism.

The maximum score for psychiatric suffering is 100. Consequently, we have to adapt this to the intervals that the current scale indicates for each of the syndromes referenced, taking the minimum and maximum scores into consideration. Thus, pSc=pmSc+(PS [pMScpmSc]/100), where pSc are the points of the scale; PS, the psychiatric suffering, pMSc, the maximum point score that is applied to the disorder; and pmSc, the minimum point score in the scale applied to the disorder.

Limitations

This proposal has been established by means of a series of experts that have agreed on the procedures with other professionals. This method implicitly involves the subjectivity of those involves in its preparation. Further studies are required in which the validity of the procedure proposed is assessed, along with the difference that might exist between it and the current form of assessing mental harm.

Funding

The study presented was funded by the Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health and by the Consortium for Excellence in Forensic Research in Andalucía.

Acknowledgements

In addition to the agencies that funded this study (mentioned in the previous section), we wish to thank the Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health and the General Council of the Judiciary for their scientific support and facilitation. Likewise, we thank Antonia Rodríguez and Samuel Aidan Kelly for their critical reading of the manuscript.

References
[1]
Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
Anuario estadístico de España 2013. Seguridad y justicia. INE [anuario].
(2013),
[2]
Dirección General de Tráfico.
Anuario estadístico de accidentes 2012. Madrid: Dirección General de Tráfico [anuario].
(2013),
[3]
T. Dionot.
Évaluation du dommage psychiatrique.
EMC – Psychiatrie, 9 (1998), pp. 1-10
[4]
C. Hernández.
Valoración médica del daño corporal.
Masson, (1996), pp. 1-3
[5]
N.C. Winters, B.R. Collett, K.M. Myers.
Ten-year review of rating scales. VII. Scales assessing functional impairment.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 44 (2005), pp. 309-338
[6]
M. García-Blázquez Pérez, C.M. García-Blázquez Pérez.
Nuevo manual de valoración y baremación del daño corporal.
Editorial Comares, S.L., (2010),
[7]
L. Mélennec.
Valoración de las discapacidades y del daño corporal. Baremo internacional de invalideces.
Elsevier Masson, (2011),
[8]
Organización Mundial de la Salud.
Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud: CIF.
Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. Secretaría de Estado de Servicios Sociales, Familias y Discapacidad. Instituto de Mayoresy Servicios Sociales (IMSERSO), (2001),
[9]
American Medical Association.
Guías para la evaluación de las deficiencias permanentes.
Instituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales, Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales, (1997), pp. 297-308
[10]
Boletín Oficial del Estado. Ley 34/2003, de 4 de noviembre, de modificación y adaptación a la normativa comunitaria de la legislación de seguros privados. BOE núm. 265 de 5 de noviembre de 2003; p. 39190–220.
[11]
Boletín Oficial del Estado. Real Decreto Legislativo 8/2004, de 29 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley sobre responsabilidad civil y seguro en la circulación de vehículos a motor. BOE núm. 267 de 5 de noviembre de 2004. p. 36662–95.
[12]
Organización Mundial de la Salud.
CIE-10: Trastornos mentales y del comportamiento. Descripciones clínicas y pautas para el diagnóstico.
MEDITOR, (1992),
[13]
American Psychiatric Association.
DSM-IV: breviario. Criterios diagnósticos.
Masson, (1995),
[14]
A. Marín Fernández.
Justificación jurídica de un método de valoración para el sufrimiento psiquiátrico postraumático.
Patología psiquiátrica postraumática: valoración psiquiátrica y judicial, pp. 57-97
[15]
A. Medina, M.J. Moreno, R. Lillo, J.A. Guija.
Patología psiquiátrica postraumática: valoración psiquiátrica y judicial.
Fundación Española de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, (2012),
[16]
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe mundial sobre la discapacidad. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/index.html [accessed 15.01.14].
[17]
Boletín Oficial del Estado. Real Decreto 1971/1999, de 23 de diciembre, de procedimiento para el reconocimiento, declaración y calificación del grado de minusvalía. BOE núm. 22, de 26 de enero de 2000. p. 3317–410.
[18]
Boletín Oficial del Estado. Corrección de errores del Real Decreto 1971/1999, de 23 de diciembre, de procedimiento para el reconocimiento, declaración y calificación del grado de minusvalía. BOE núm. 62 de 13 de marzo de 2000. p. 10297–304.

Please cite this article as: Guija JA, Medina A, Giner L, Lledó C, Marín A, Arechederra JJ, et al. Un nuevo método de valoración de la enfermedad psiquiátrica postraumática. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Barc.). 2015;8:245–250.

Copyright © 2014. SEP y SEPB
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.rpsmen.2021.01.001
No mostrar más