Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
References
[1]
Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Diagnosis,
[2]
R.D. Alarcón.
Globalization and mental health: Blessing or Curse?.
Presented at Symposium on the State of Mental Health in different cultures. First World Congress of Cultural Psychiatry,
[3]
Spiegel A. The dictionary of disorder: How one man revolutionized psychiatry. New Yorker, Jan. 3, 2005. http://www.newyorker.com/archiove/2005/01/03/050103fa_fact
[4]
K.S. Kendler, P. Zachar.
The incredible insecurity of psychiatric nosology. In: Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry. Explanation.
Phenomenology and Nosology,
[5]
C. Craver.
Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of Neuroscience.
Oxford University Press, (2007),
[6]
J.C. Wakefield, M.B. First.
Clarifying the distinction between disorder and non-disorder: Confronting the overdiagnosis (false positives) problem in DSM-V.
Advancing DSM. Dilemmas in Psychiatric Diagnosis, pp. 23-56
[7]
A. Angold, C.M. Heim.
A developmental perspective, with a focus on childhood trauma.
Age and gender considerations in Psychiatric Diagnosis, pp. 81-100
[8]
Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, Cultural Psychiatry Committee. Issues for DSM-V: The role of culture in psychiatric diagnosis. Editorial (in press). J Nerv Ment Disease, 2009.
[9]
R.D. Alarcón.
Posibilidades y limitaciones del componente cultural en el diagnóstico psiquiátrico. Presented at Symposium on New Classifications in Psychiatry.
10th National Congress of Psychiatry,
[10]
S.E. Hyman, W.S. Fenton.
What are the right targets for psychopharmacology?.
Science, 160 (2003), pp. 636-645
[11]
R.D. Comstock, E.M. Castillo, S.P. Lindsay.
Four-year review of the use of Race and Ethnicity in Epidemiologic and Public health research.
Am J Epidemiology, 159 (2004), pp. 611-619
[12]
Advancing DSM. Dilemmas in Psychiatric Diagnosis,
[13]
T. Reichborn-Kjennerud, E. Falkum.
The foundation for psychiatric treatment –from belief to science.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 120 (2000), pp. 1148-1152
[14]
K.W.M. Fulford, M. Broome, G. Stanghellini, T. Thornton.
Looking with both eyes open: Fact and value in psychiatric diagnosis?.
World Psychiatry, 4 (2005), pp. 78-86
[15]
H. Putnam.
The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays.
Harvard University Press, (2002),
[16]
Hechos y Valores en Psiquiatría,
[17]
K.S. Kendler, P.S. Appelbaum, C.C. Bell, et al.
Issues for DSM-V: DSM-V should include a Conceptual Issues Work Group.
Am J Psychiatry, 165 (2008), pp. 174-175
[18]
G. Andrews, S. Henderson, W. Hall.
Prevalence, comorbidity, disability, and service utilization: an overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey.
Br J Psychiatry, 178 (2001), pp. 145-153
[19]
M.F. Lopez, W.M. Compton, B.F. Grant, et al.
Dimensional approaches in diagnostic classification. A critical appraisal.
Dimensional Approaches in Diagnostic Classification. Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V, pp. 1-4
[20]
K.F. Shaffner.
Etiological models in Psychiatry: Reductive and non-reductive approaches.
Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry. Explanation, Phenomenology, and Nosology, pp. 48-89
[21]
A.F. Lehman, G.S. Alexopulos, H. Goldman, et al.
Mental disorders and disability: Time to reevaluate the relationship?.
A Research Agenda for DSM-V, pp. 201-218
[22]
R.D. Alarcón.
¿Hacia la globalización de los sistemas diagnósticos en Psiquiatría?.
(Editorial) Salud Mental, 32 (2009), pp. 91-92
Copyright © 2010. SEP y SEPB