metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Hernioplastias preperitoneales en M. Técnica y resultados en una serie de 280 c...
Journal Information
Vol. 74. Issue 4.
Pages 221-227 (October 2003)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 74. Issue 4.
Pages 221-227 (October 2003)
Full text access
Hernioplastias preperitoneales en M. Técnica y resultados en una serie de 280 casos
M-shaped preperitoneal hernioplasties. Technique and results in a series of 280 cases
Visits
8888
Joaquín S. Picazo1
Corresponding author
salvelio@yahoo.es

Correspondencia: Dr. J.S. Picazo. Clara Campoamor, 2, portal 3, 2.° B. 13600 Alcázar de San Juan. Ciudad Real. España.
, Carlos Moreno, Juan B. Muñoz, Miguel A. Corral, Manuel E. Marcello, Julián de Pedro, Gloria Tadeo, María A. Alonso, Marina Manzanera, Federico Ochando, José B. Seoane
Unidad de Pared Abdominal. Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo. Complejo Hospitalario La Mancha-Centro. Alcázar de San Juan. Ciudad Real. España
This item has received
Article information
Resumen
Introducción

La efectividad del tratamiento de las hernias inguinocrurales por vía preperitoneal sigue siendo objeto de discusión. El desarrollo de la hernioplastia videoasistida totalmente extraperitoneal (TEP) ha reavivado el interés por los resultados a largo plazo de las técnicas preperitoneales abiertas. La técnica descrita en este trabajo combina algunas de las principales ventajas de los dos procedimientos preperitoneales abiertos más extendidos (Nyhus y Stoppa).

Métodos

Entre marzo de 1995 y enero de 2002, 256 pacientes consecutivos, con un total de 280 hernias inguinocrurales, han sido tratados mediante una técnica preperitoneal abierta modificada, con una prótesis de polipropileno de 12 ×10 cm, sin suturas. Se analizan las características de la serie, los datos más relevantes de la técnica, la morbimortalidad y el seguimiento a medio plazo.

Resultados

La edad media de los pacientes fue de 57 años (rango 15-88). La duración media de la intervención fue de 38 min, con una tasa de complicaciones postoperatorias del 7,3%. La estancia hospitalaria global media fue de 1,98 días. Con un seguimiento medio de 5,5 años, la tasa de recidiva ha sido del 0,87%.

Conclusiones

La hernioplastia preperitoneal en M (HPM) es una técnica segura y relativamente sencilla para el tratamiento de las hernias inguinocrurales, independientemente del tipo de hernia o de las condiciones clinicopatológicas del paciente.

Palabras clave:
Hernia inguinal
Abordaje preperitoneal
Prótesis
Recidiva
Introduction

The effectiveness of treatment of inguinocrural hernias using the preperitoneal approach continues to be debated. The development of videoassisted totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty has revived interest in the long-term results of open preperitoneal techniques. The technique described herein combines some of the main advantages of the two open preperitoneal procedures that are most widely used (Nyhus and Stoppa).

Methods

Between March 1995 and January 2002, 256 consecutive patients with a total of 280 inguinocrural hernias were treated using a modified open preperitoneal technique, with a 12 x 10 cm suturefree polypropylene prosthesis. We analyzed the characteristics of the series, the most important data concerning the technique, morbidity and mortality, and medium-term follow-up.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 57 years (range: 15-88). The mean operating time was 38 minutes, with a postoperative complication rate of 7.3%. The mean overall length of hospital stay was 1.98 days. With a mean follow-up of 5.5 years, the recurrence rate was 0.87%.

Conclusions

M-shaped preperitoneal hernioplasty is a safe and relatively simple technique for the treatment of inguinocrural hernias, independently of the type of hernia or the clinicopathological features of the patient.

Key words:
Inguinal hernia
Preperitoneal approach
Prosthesis
Recurrence
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
T. Annandale.
On a method of operating in certain cases of strangulated hernia.
Edinburgh M J, 19 (1873), pp. 209
[2.]
L.M. Nyhus, R.E. Condon, H.N. Harkins.
Clinical experiences with preperitoneal hernial repair for all types of hernia of the groin.
Am J Surg, 100 (1960), pp. 234-244
[3.]
R.E. Stoppa, J. Petit, X. Henry.
Unsutured dacron prosthesis in groin hernias.
Int Surg, 60 (1975), pp. 411-412
[4.]
H.C. Hoffman, A.L. Vinton.
Preperitoneal prosthetic herniorrhaphy. One surgeon’s successful technique.
Arch Surg, 128 (1993), pp. 964-970
[5.]
J.F. Gillion, M. Galy, C. Jan, G. Tinel.
Cure des hernies de l’aine par mise en place propéritonéale d’un patch souple de ePTFE.
Ann Chir, 47 (1993), pp. 609-615
[6.]
J.S. Goodwin, L.W. Traverso.
A prospective cost and outcome comparison of inguinal hernia repairs. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus open tension-free preperitoneal.
Surg Endosc, 9 (1995), pp. 981-983
[7.]
G.J. Maddern, G. Rudkin, J.R. Bessell, P. Devitt, L. Ponte.
A comparison of laparoscopic and open hernia repair as a day surgical procedure.
Surg Endosc, 8 (1994), pp. 1404-1408
[8.]
G.E. Wantz.
The technique of giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac performed through an anterior groin incision.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 176 (1993), pp. 497-500
[9.]
L.M. Nyhus, R. Pollak, C.T. Bombeck.
The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic butress repair for recurrent hernia: the evolution of a technique.
Ann Surg, 208 (1988), pp. 733-737
[10.]
J.S. Picazo, J.B. Seoane, C. Moreno, E. Moreno.
Description of M-shaped preperitoneal hernioplasty for inguinocrural hernias.
Am J Surg, 185 (2003), pp. 108-113
[11.]
R.E. Stoppa, J.L. Rives, C.R. Warlaumont, P.J. Palot, P.J. Verhaeghe, J.F. Delattre.
Empleo del dacrón en la reparación de las hernias inguinales.
Surg Clin North Am, 64 (1984), pp. 261-277
[12.]
I.M. Rutkow.
The importance of socioeconomic issues in surgical outcomes: What is a relevant end point?.
Eur J Surg, 161 (1995), pp. 545-548
[13.]
R.C. Read.
Preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a historical review.
World J Surg, 13 (1989), pp. 532-540
[14.]
H.M. Schaap, H.D. Van de Pavoordt, T.J. Bast.
The preperitoneal approach in the repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 174 (1992), pp. 460-464
[15.]
R. Bendavid.
Complications of groin hernia surgery.
Surg Clin North Am, 78 (1998), pp. 1089-1103
[16.]
H.C. Hoffman, A.L. Vinton.
Preperitoneal prosthetic herniorrhaphy. One surgeon’s successful technique.
Arch Surg, 128 (1993), pp. 964-970
[17.]
I.L. Lichtenstein, A.G. Shulman, P.K. Amid, M.M. Montllor.
The tensionfree hernioplasty.
Am J Surg, 157 (1989), pp. 188-193
[18.]
E. Felix, S. Scott, B. Crafton, P. Geis, T. Duncan, R. Sewell, et al.
Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. A multicenter study.
Surg Endosc, 12 (1998), pp. 226-231
[19.]
A.T. Spaw, B.W. Ennis, L.P. Spaw.
Laparoscopic hernia repair: the anatomic basis.
J Laparoendosc Surg, 1 (1991), pp. 269-277
[20.]
R.E. Stoppa, C.R. Warlaumont, P.J. Verhaeghe, E.R. Romero.
Prosthetic repair in the treatment of groin hernias.
Int Surg, 71 (1986), pp. 154-158
[21.]
G.E. Wantz.
El abordaje preperitoneal y la plástica protésica en la hernia inguinal [comentario especial].
pp. 200-224
[22.]
J.P. Van Damme.
A preperitoneal approach in the prosthetic repair of inguinal hernia.
Int Surg, 70 (1985), pp. 223-226
[23.]
C.C. Solorzano, R.M. Minter, T.C. Childers, J.W. Kilkenny, J.N. Vauthey.
Prospective evaluation of the giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac for recurrent and complex bilateral inguinal hernias.
Am J Surg, 177 (1999), pp. 19-22
[24.]
D.P. Rignault.
Properitoneal prosthetic inguinal hernioplasty through a pfannenstiel approach.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 163 (1986), pp. 465-468
[25.]
R.E. Stoppa, C.R. Warlaumont.
El abordaje preperitoneal y la plástica protésica en la hernia inguinal.
pp. 200-224
[26.]
E. Gross, O. Köfüncü.
Preperitoneal implantation of dacron sheet for repair of recurrent and bilateral groin hernias.
Zentralbl Chir, 119 (1994), pp. 207-213
[27.]
J.L. Rives.
Surgical treatment of the inguinal hernia with Dacron patch.
Int Surg, 47 (1967), pp. 361-371
[28.]
J.F. Patiño, L.G. García-Herreros, N. Zundel.
Inguinal hernia repair. The Nyhus posterior preperitoneal operation.
Surg Clin North Am, 78 (1998), pp. 1063-1074
[29.]
R. Pollak, L.M. Nyhus.
Complications of preperitoneal hernia repair.
Prob Gen Surg, 3 (1986), pp. 343-349
[30.]
M. Issa, P.M. Noundou, Y. Kauny, S. Miclo, L.J. Holderbach.
La cure de la hernie de l’aine par voie médiane prépéritonéale avec une plaque de Dacron.
J Chir, 123 (1986), pp. 435-438
[31.]
D.W. Mozingo, M.J. Walters, D.P. Otchy, D. Rosenthal.
Properitoneal synthetic mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 174 (1992), pp. 33-35
[32.]
R. Sales, E. Piedrafita, M. Velasco, J. Puig La Calle, X. Rius, J. López Gibert.
La vía preperitoneal en la reparación de la hernia inguinal recidivada. Resultados del tratamiento en 62 herniorrafias.
Cir Esp, 51 (1992), pp. 187-189
[33.]
A. Celdrán, P. Vorwald, E. Meroño.
A single technique for polypropylene mesh hernioplasty of inguinal and femoral hernias.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 175 (1992), pp. 359-361
[34.]
D. Dávila, R. Trullenque.
Vía preperitoneal en el tratamiento de las hernias de la ingle. Técnica e indicaciones.
pp. 118-128
[35.]
R.C. Shamberger, L.W. Ottinger, R.A. Malt.
Arterial injuries during inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Ann Surg, 200 (1984), pp. 83-85
[36.]
A.S. Seid, E. Amos.
Entrapment neuropathy in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.
Surg Endosc, 8 (1994), pp. 1050-1053
[37.]
C. Tetik, M.E. Arregui, J.L. Dulucq, R.J. Fitzgibbons, M.E. Franklin, J.B. McKernan, et al.
Complications and recurrences associated with laparoscopic repair of groin hernias.
Surg Endosc, 8 (1994), pp. 1316-1323
[38.]
J.S. Margolis, R.A. Braun.
Preperitoneal versus classical hernioplasty.
Am J Surg, 121 (1971), pp. 641-643
[39.]
E.E. Peacock.
Subcutaneous extraperitoneal repair of ventral hernias: a biological basis for fascial transplantation.
Ann Surg, 181 (1975), pp. 722-725
[40.]
J.S. Picazo.
Descripción de la hernioplastia preperitoneal en M.
Universidad Complutense, (1998),
[41.]
R. Fowler.
The applied surgical anatomy of the peritoneal fascia of the groin and the “secondary” internal inguinal ring.
Aust N Z J Surg, 45 (1975), pp. 8-14
[42.]
G.E. Wantz.
Testicular atrophy as a sequela of inguinal hernioplasty.
Int Surg, 71 (1986), pp. 159-163
[43.]
G.E. Wantz.
Atrofia testicular y neuralgia crónica residual como riesgos de la hernioplastia inguinal.
Clin Quir Nort Am, 3 (1993), pp. 613-624
[44.]
A.G. Greenburg.
Revisiting the recurrent groin hernia.
Am J Surg, 154 (1987), pp. 35-40
[45.]
R.S. Rhodes.
Ambulatory surgery and the societal cost of surgery.
Surgery, 116 (1994), pp. 938-940
[46.]
M.A. Malangoni, R.E. Condon.
Preperitoneal repair of acute incarcerated and strangulated hernias of the groin.
Surg Gynecol Obstet, 162 (1986), pp. 65-67
[47.]
R.C. Read.
Bilaterality and the prosthetic repair of large recurrent inguinal hernias.
Am J Surg, 138 (1979), pp. 788-793
[48.]
I.L. Lichtenstein.
C.V. Mosby, (1970),
Copyright © 2003. Asociación Española de Cirujanos
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos