metricas
covid
Buscar en
Clinics
Toda la web
Inicio Clinics Larotrectinib versus infigratinib for adult patients with both glioma and tyrosi...
Journal Information
Vol. 79. (In progress)
(January - December 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
607
Vol. 79. (In progress)
(January - December 2024)
Original articles
Full text access
Larotrectinib versus infigratinib for adult patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after failure of initial therapies: Efficacy and safety analysis
Visits
607
Yufang Chena,1, Jian Mab,1, Qianqian Gaoa, Yu Gaia, Yichi Suna, Meihua Wanga,
Corresponding author
wangmeihua1234@suda.edu.cn

Corresponding author.
a Department of Pathology, Changzhou Tumor Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
b Department of Oncology, Changzhou Tumor Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
Highlights

  • Tyrosine kinase domains with genomic alterations have oncogenic potential.

  • Higher efficacy for infigratinib than larotrectinib.

  • Infigratinib has a higher overall survival than larotrectinib.

  • Infigratinib has higher adverse effects than larotrectinib.

  • Bevacizumab initial therapy has a higher overall survival.

This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Treatment response evaluation.
Table 2. Demographic and clinical parameters of enrolled patients before the start of second-line treatment for glioma.
Table 3. Treatment response evaluation after the termination of 2nd line treatment.
Table 4. Adverse effects during 2nd line treatment and 18-months of followed-up.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib with those of infigratinib in adult glioma patients with tyrosine kinase alterations.

Methods

Patients received oral infigratinib 125 mg (IN cohort, n = 125) or oral larotrectinib (LB cohort, n = 105) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

Results

Duration of treatment was longer in the LB cohort than in the IN cohort (8 [9.5–6.25] months vs. 5.5 [6–5.25] months, p < 0.0001). Patients with partial responses (p = 0.0424) and overall survival (p = 0.03) were higher in the IN cohort than those in the LB cohort. The number of patients with disease progression was higher in the LB cohort (p = 0.0015). All the patients reported diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, constipation, and decreased appetite. Patients in the IN cohort reported hyperphosphatemia, hyperlipasemia, stomatitis, dry skin, alopecia, dyspepsia, onycholysis, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, nail disorders, and dry eyes. Patients in the LB cohort reported upper respiratory tract infections, pyrexia, cough, anemia, bacterial/viral infections, conjunctivitis, urinary tract infections, headaches, ataxia, dizziness, and muscle tremors. A total of 30 (24 %) and 40 (38 %) patients from the IN and the LB cohorts died at the follow-up of 18 months (p = 0.03). Patients who received bevacizumab initial therapy had higher overall survival (p = 0.048).

Conclusions

Infigratinib has higher efficacy and overall survival than larotrectinib but has higher adverse effects in the management of both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after failure of initial therapies. Initial bevacizumab therapy is associated with a higher overall survival.

Keywords:
Glioma
Hyperphosphatemia
Infigratinib
Larotrectinib
Tyrosine kinase alteration
List of abbreviations:
IN cohort
LB cohort
χ2-test
ECOG
SD
CI
WHO
CNS
Full Text
Introduction

Gliomas are a type of neuroepithelial tissue1 that is about 2 % of all types of occurring cancers (rare diseases).2 Glioblastomas are aggressive and lethal types of gliomas.3 The tyrosine kinase domains of genomic alterations in gliomas demonstrate oncogenic potential.4 Tyrosine kinase domains are available with fibroblast growth factor receptors5 and play a vital role in neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene encoding.6 Tyrosine kinase alterations have a vital role in the development of glioma.5,6 Limited literature is available on the mechanism of action of tyrosine kinase alterations responsible for the development of glioma.7

Larotrectinib (tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor) monotherapy6 and infigratinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) monotherapy5 are both effective in the treatment of gliomas with tyrosine kinase alterations in adult patients. However, to date, larotrectinib monotherapy has not been compared with infigratinib monotherapy for the treatment of glioma, where tyrosine kinase alterations occur in the development of glioma.

The objectives of this retrospective study were to compare progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, and adverse effects between adult patients with glioma with tyrosine kinase alterations who received larotrectinib and those who received infigratinib.

Materials and methodsEthics approval and consent to participate

The designed protocol was prepared by the authors and approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Changzhou Tumor Hospital (Approval number CJ20220224 dated January 10, 2016) and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. As this was a retrospective study, informed consent of patients and/or their legally authorized person(s) was waived by the human ethics committee of the Changzhou Tumor Hospital. The study follows the laws of China and the v2008 Declarations of Helinski.

Inclusion criteria

Adult glioma patients with pathologically confirmed tyrosine kinase alterations after failure of initial therapy were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who required anticonvulsant drugs (e.g., carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin) were excluded from the study (because of strong inducers of CYP3A4). In addition, patients with abnormal calcium and/or phosphate homeostasis, neurological instability, history of corneal/keratopathy, or retinal disorders were excluded from the study. Patients with a history of sensitivity to larotrectinib and infigratinib were excluded from this study.

Cohorts

A total of 125 patients received oral infigratinib 125 mg once daily on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle until unacceptable toxicities or disease progression (IN cohort).5 The patients were recommended a low-phosphate diet. In cases of hyperphosphatemia (plasma inorganic phosphate level > 4.5 mg/dL), oral phosphate binder(s) were provided to patients. A total of 105 patients received 100 mg twice daily of oral larotrectinib until unacceptable toxicities or disease progression (LB cohort).6 The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 was used to define unacceptable toxicities. Disease progression was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and pathology.

ECOG performance status

ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status was graded as 0 ‒ Fully active; 1 ‒ Unable to perform strenuous activities; 2 ‒ Capable of all self-care activities but dependent on others to carry out normal activities; 3 ‒ Capable of performing limited self-care activities; 4 ‒ Completely disabled.

Treatment response evaluation

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed every 2 months. RECIST 1.1 criteria8 was used to evaluate treatment response. Oncologists, in assistance with radiologists, evaluated the treatment response. The responses are listed in Table 1.9

Table 1.

Treatment response evaluation.

Different types of responses  Criteria 
Complete response  Complete invisible of all advanced measurables and unmeasurable diseases. 
Partial response  50 % or more decrease of all advanced measurables and unmeasurable diseases. That is sustained for at least 4-weeks, with no new lesions. 
Progression  25 % or more increase in all advanced measurables and unmeasurable diseases. 
Stable disease  Not qualified for partial response and no progression of the disease. 

Oncologists in assistance with radiologists have evaluated treatment response.

Magnetic resonance imaging scans and pathology were preferred for evaluation of response.

SurvivalProgression-free survival

Survival of patient without any progression of disease after treatment(s).

Overall survival

The detection of disease(s) to death was considered the overall survival of the patient.

New disease lesions or disease progression were detected using magnetic resonance imaging scans and pathology.

Adverse effects

The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used to evaluate adverse effects during the treatment(s) and follow-up period.10

Hyperphosphatemia

A plasma inorganic phosphate level of more than 4.5 mg/dL was considered hyperphosphatemia. Blood pathology was performed to detect the plasma inorganic phosphate levels.

Statistical analysis

InStat 3.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. All results were considered significant if the p-value was less than 0.05. Categorical, continuous normal, and continuous non-normal variables are presented as frequencies (percentages), mean±Standard Deviation (SD), and median (Q3–Q1), respectively. Fisher's exact test or the Chi-Square test (χ2-test) was performed for categorical variables. Kolmogorov and Smirnov tests were performed to check the normality of continuous variables. The Mann-Whitney test was used for the statistical analysis of non-normal continuous variables. Multivariate analysis was used for statistical analysis of the evaluation of independent parameters (treatment, gender, ethnicity, ECOG status, and initial therapies) for higher overall survival at a 95 % Confidence Interval (95 % CI).

ResultsStudy population

From January 15, 2016, to December 17, 2018, 240 adult patients with glioma with tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapy were available at the Changzhou Tumor Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, and the referring hospitals. Among them (240 glioma patients), three patients were on anticonvulsant drugs, one patient had abnormal calcium homeostasis, one patient had abnormal phosphate homeostasis, one patient was neurologically unstable, one patient had a history of corneal disorders, one patient had a history of keratopathy, and two patients had a history of retinal disorders. Therefore, these patients (10 glioma patients) were excluded from the study. The medical records of progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, and adverse effects of 230 patients with glioma with tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapy were included in the analysis. A retrospective flowchart of the study is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The retrospective flow chart.

(0.26MB).
Demographic and clinical parameters

The number of male patients was higher than that of female patients. More than 50 % of patients had ECOG performance status 1. There were no significant differences in sex, age, ethnicity, ECOG performance status, initial therapies (i.e., failure) between cohorts before the start of second-line treatment for glioma (previous treatments received including radiation), the time frame of diagnosis, medicine administration, extent of surgery, prior history of cancer, and genetic background of participants. The details of the demographic and clinical parameters of the enrolled patients before the start of second-line treatment for glioma are reported in Table 2.

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical parameters of enrolled patients before the start of second-line treatment for glioma.

ParametersTotalCohortsComparisons between cohorts
IN  LB 
Treatment(s)2nd line  Infigratinib  Larotrectinib 
Numbers of patients230  125  105  p-value  95 % CI  Df  Test value 
GenderMale  135 (59)  70 (56)  65 (62)  0.4404 (χ2-test)0.7071 to 1.13410.5952
Female  95 (41)  55 (44)  40 (38) 
Age (years)52 (57–44)  52 (57–44)  52 (56.5–43)  0.5211 (Mann-Whitney test)  N/A  N/A  6239.5 
EthnicityHan Chinese  214 (93)  117 (94)  97 (92)  0.7292 (χ2-test for Trend)N/A10.1199
Mongolian  14 (6)  7 (5)  7 (7) 
Tibetan  2 (1)  1 (1)  1 (1) 
ECOG performance status55 (24)  30 (24)  25 (24)  0.9799 (χ2-test for independence)N/A20.0451
140 (56)  70 (56)  60 (57) 
45 (20)  25 (20)  20 (19) 
Initial TherapiesRadiotherapy  25 (11)  15 (12)  10 (10)  0.7456 (χ2-test for independence)N/A31.231
Antineoplastic therapy  60 (26)  35 (28)  25 (24) 
Bevacizumab  85 (37)  45 (36)  40 (38) 
Temozolomide  60 (26)  30 (24)  30 (28) 

Categorial variables are depicted as frequencies (percentages). Continuous non-normal variables are depicted as median (Q3–Q1).

CI, Confidence Interval (using the approximation of Katz.); Df, Degree of freedom; N/A, Not Applicable; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (0: Fully active; 1: Unable to do strenuous activities; 2: Capable of all self-care but dependent on others to carry out normal activities).

Test value (χ2 value for χ2-test, Mann-Whitney U-statistic for Mann-Whitney test).

Treatment response evaluation

The duration of treatment was higher in the LB cohort than in the IN cohort (8 [9.5–6.25] months vs. 5.5 [6–5.25] months, p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test, Mann–Whitney U-statistic = 1811). Patients with a complete response and stable disease were statistically similar between the cohorts. However, the number of patients with partial responses was higher in the IN cohort. The number of patients with disease progression was higher in the LB cohort. The details of the treatment response evaluation after the termination of 2nd line treatment are reported in Table 3.

Table 3.

Treatment response evaluation after the termination of 2nd line treatment.

ParametersTotalCohortsComparisons between cohorts
IN  LB 
Treatment(s)  2nd line  Infigratinib  Larotrectinib 
Numbers of patients  230  125  105  p-value  95 % CI  Df  Test value 
Complete response  22 (10)  13 (10)  9 (9)  0.6611 (Fisher exact test)  0.7581 to 1.588  N/A  1.097 
Partial response  62 (27)  41 (33)  21 (20)  0.0424 (χ2-test with Yate's correction)  1.047 to 1.671  4.121 
Progression  69 (30)  26 (21)  43 (41)  0.0015 (χ2-test with Yate's correction)  0.4418 to 0.8500  10.097 
Stable disease  77 (33)  45 (36)  32 (30)  0.4569 (χ2-test with Yate's correction)  0.8777 to 1.423  0.5535 

Variables are depicted as frequencies (percentages).

RECIST 1.1 criteria were used for the evaluation of treatment response.

Oncologists in assistance with radiologists have evaluated treatment response.

CI, Confidence Interval (using the approximation of Katz.); Df, Degree of freedom; N/A, Not Applicable.

Test value (χ2 value or relative risk value for χ2-test Fisher exact test).

Survival

From the start of treatment and after the termination of 2nd line treatment in a follow-up of 18 months, a total of 14 (11 %) and 10 (10 %) patients from the IN and the LB cohorts had progression-free survival. Progression-free survival of patients was the same between cohorts from the start of treatment, during treatment, and in followed-up of 18 months after termination of 2nd line treatment (p = 0.999, Fisher’s exact test, 95 % CI: 0.6270 to 1.471, Relative Risk = 0.9603). From the start of treatment, during treatment, and at the follow-up of 18 months a total of 30 (24 %) and 40 (38 %) patients from the IN and the LB cohorts died. overall survival of patients in the IN cohort was higher than that of the LB cohort (p = 0.03, χ2-test with Yates correction, degree of freedom: 1, 95 % CI: 0.5350 to 0.9738, χ2-value: 4.71).

Adverse effects

Patients in the IN cohort reported hyperphosphatemia, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, hyperlipidemia, stomatitis, dry skin, alopecia, decreased appetite, dyspepsia, onycholysis, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, constipation, nail disorder, and dry eyes during 2nd line treatment and 18-months of followed-up. Patients in the LB cohort reported diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, constipation, upper respiratory tract infection, pyrexia, cough, anemia, bacterial and/or viral infection, conjunctivitis, urinary tract infection, headache, ataxia, dizziness, and muscle tremor during 2nd line treatment and 18-months of followed-up. The details of the adverse effects during 2nd line treatment and 18 months of follow-up are reported in Table 4.

Table 4.

Adverse effects during 2nd line treatment and 18-months of followed-up.

ParametersCohortsComparisons between cohorts
IN  LB 
Treatment(s)  Infigratinib  Larotrectinib 
Numbers of patients  125  105  p-value  95 % CI  Df  Test value 
Hyperphosphatemia  94 (75)a  0 (0)  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  3.220 to 5.978  N/A  4.378 
Diarrhea  20 (16)a  60 (57)b  <0.0001 (χ2-test with Yate's correction)  0.2409 to 0.5295  40.788 
Fatigue  30 (24)a  55 (52)b  <0.0001 (χ2-test with Yate's correction)  0.3946 to 0.7354  18.529 
Vomiting  65 (52)a  60 (57)b  0.5176 (χ2-test with Yate's correction)  0.7185 to 1.153  0.4187 
Hyperlipasemia  15 (12)a  0 (0)  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  1.715 to 2.227  N/A  1.955 
Stomatitis  14 (11)a  0 (0)  0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  1.709 to 2.216  N/A  1.946 
Dry skin  13 (10)a  0 (0)  0.0003 (Fisher exact test)  1.703 to 2.204  N/A  1.938 
Alopecia  22 (18)a  0 (0)  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  1.760 to 2.316  N/A  2.019 
Decreased appetite  18 (14)a  18 (17)b  0.5893 (Fisher exact test)  0.6385 to 1.287  N/A  0.9065 
Dyspepsia  9 (7)a  0(0)  0.0043 (Fisher exact test)  1.681 to 2.160  N/A  1.905 
Onycholysis  8 (6)a  0 (0)  0.0085 (Fisher exact test)  1.675 to 2.149  N/A  1.897 
Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia  7 (6)a  0 (0)  0.0166 (Fisher exact test)  1.670 to 2.139  N/A  1.89 
Constipation  12 (10)a  32 (30)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  0.2733 to 0.7374  N/A  0.4489 
Nail disorder  11 (9)a  0(0)  0.0011 (Fisher exact test)  1.692 to 2.181  N/A  1.921 
Dry eye  8 (6)a  0(0)  0.0085 (Fisher exact test)  1.675 to 2.149  N/A  1.897 
Upper respiratory tract infection  0 (0)  55 (54)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Pyrexia  0 (0)  35 (33)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Cough  0(0)  31 (30)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Anemia  0 (0)  32 (30)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Bacterial/Viral infection  0 (0)  22 (21)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Conjunctivitis  0 (0)  19 (18)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Urinary tract infection  0 (0)  15 (14)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Headache  0 (0)  21 (20)b  <0.0001 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Ataxia  0 (0)  7 (7)b  0.0037 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Dizziness  0 (0)  5 (3)b  0.0188 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 
Muscle tremor  0 (0)  4 (4)  0.0421 (Fisher exact test)  -Infinity to Infinity  N/A 

Variables are depicted as frequencies (percentages). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 was used for the evaluation of adverse effects.

CI, Confidence Interval (using the approximation of Katz.); Df, Degree of freedom; N/A, Not Applicable.

Test value (χ2 value or relative risk value for χ2-test Fisher exact test).

a

Infigratinib-emergent adverse effects.

b

Larotrectinib-emergent adverse effects.

Hyperphosphatemia: > 4.5 mg/dL plasma inorganic phosphate level.

Independent parameter

Patients who received bevacizumab initial therapy had higher overall survival (p = 0.048, Odds Ratio: 1.0241, 95 % CI: 1.0011 to 1.3211, multivariate analysis).

Discussions

Patients with partial response were higher in the IN cohort, and patients with progression were higher in the LB cohort after termination of 2nd line treatment. The poor blood-brain barrier penetration of Larotrectinib6,11 is responsible for the higher progression of disease in patients in the LB cohort. Infigratinib can penetrate the central nervous system5 and is responsible for a higher partial response in patients in the IN cohort. Infigratinib has higher efficacy than larotrectinib in adult patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapies.

Progression-free survival was the same, but overall survival was higher among adult patients with glioma with tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapies who received infigratinib than among those who received larotrectinib. Partial response was higher and disease progression was lower among adult patients with glioma with tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapies who received infigratinib, which would lead to an increase in overall survival of patients, but these were not enough for progression-free survival of patients. Infigratinib increases the overall survival of adult patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapies.

Larotrectinib-emergent adverse effects were higher than infigratinib-emergent adverse effects. Larotrectinib has a favorable safety profile in both adult and pediatric patients.6,12 The infigratinib-emergent adverse effects observed in the current study are consistent with those in clinical trials.5,13 Infigratinib has more adverse effects than larotrectinib in the management of both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after failure of initial therapies.

Initial bevacizumab therapy is associated with a higher overall survival. The results of the independent parameters for overall survival in the current study are consistent with those of the phase II study.5 A combination of bevacizumab with infigratinib or larotrectinib could result in higher overall survival of patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations.

Performing chi square or Mann-Whitney tests are inadequate for evaluating the overall survival in cancer treatment. In almost all clinical evaluations of overall survival, median survival times, and cancer-related survival rates, the statistical analysis for comparison between treatment options is performed by Kaplan Meier estimator curves. The possible justifications for the same are Kaplan Meier estimator curves used for predictions of overall survival and progression-free survival. However, in the current study the authors have absolute parameters for overall survival and progression-free survival because of the 18 months of followed-up period of data. As because of the availability of absolute values, the authors have evaluated overall survival and progression-free survival using Fisher’s exact test instead of Kaplan–Meier estimator curves.

The study proposed to perform a clinical evaluation for efficacy and safety analysis of larotrectinib or infigratinib therapies for patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations. However, there are certain limitations of this study, for example, its retrospective design and the lack of randomized trials. The study did not report or discuss the efficacy of infigratinib and larotrectinib in recurrent disease conditions. The absence of WHO 2021 CNS tumor classification14 applied to what seems to be collectively referred to as “glioma”, and thereby it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of these two drugs. What constitutes glioma is currently understood to represent a rather vast array of tumors that must be evaluated based on their molecular characteristics to draw any valid conclusions.

Conclusions

Infigratinib has a higher efficacy than larotrectinib in adult patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapies. Infigratinib increases the overall survival compared to larotrectinib in adult patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations. Infigratinib has more adverse effects than larotrectinib in the management of adult patients with both glioma and tyrosine kinase alterations after the failure of initial therapies. A combination of bevacizumab with infigratinib or larotrectinib could result in higher overall survival of patients with glioma.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

All the authors have read and approved the manuscript for publication. YC and JM were project administrators who contributed equally to the conceptualization, formal analysis, supervision, resources, methodology, validation, and literature review of the study. QG contributed to the investigation, resources, conceptualization, visualization, formal analysis, methodology, and literature review. YG contributed resources, formal analysis, conceptualization, methodology, data curation, and literature review. YS contributed to the resources, supervision, formal analysis, data curation, and literature review. MW contributed to the resources, funding acquisition, formal analysis, methodology, and literature review of the study and drafted and edited the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of this study, ensuring its integrity and accuracy. YC and JM confirmed the authenticity of the raw data.

Funding

This study was supported by the Changzhou Sci & Tech Program, China (Grant no. CJ20220224).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the medical and non-medical staff of the Changzhou Tumor Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

References
[1]
QT Ostrom, G Cioffi, H Gittleman, N Patil, K Waite, C Kruchko, et al.
CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012–2016.
Neuro Oncol, 21 (2019), pp. v1-v100
[2]
AM Molinaro, JW Taylor, JK Wiencke, MR. Wrensch.
Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse glioma.
Nat Rev Neurol, 15 (2019), pp. 405-417
[3]
PY Wen, M Weller, EQ Lee, BM Alexander, JS Barnholtz-Sloan, FP Barthel, et al.
Glioblastoma in adults: a society for neuro-oncology (SNO) and European society of neuro-oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.
Neuro Oncol, 22 (2020), pp. 1073-1113
[4]
M Tilak, J Holborn, LA New, J Lalonde, N. Jones.
Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and targeting in glioblastoma multiforme.
Int J Mol Sci, 22 (2021), pp. 1831
[5]
AB Lassman, JM Sepúlveda-Sánchez, TF Cloughesy, MJ Gil-Gil, VK Puduvalli, JJ Raizer, et al.
Infigratinib in patients with recurrent gliomas and FGFR alterations: a multicenter phase II study.
Clin Cancer Res, 28 (2022), pp. 2270-2277
[6]
F Doz, CM van Tilburg, B Geoerger, M Højgaard, I Øra, V Boni, et al.
Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive primary central nervous system tumors.
Neuro Oncol, 24 (2022), pp. 997-1007
[7]
A Jimenez-Pascual, FA. Siebzehnrubl.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor functions in glioblastoma.
[8]
LH Schwartz, S Litière, E de Vries, R Ford, S Gwyther, S Mandrekar, et al.
RECIST 1.1-update and clarification: from the RECIST committee.
Eur J Cancer, 62 (2016), pp. 132-137
[9]
PY Wen, DR Macdonald, DA Reardon, TF Cloughesy, AG Sorensen, E Galanis, et al.
Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.
J Clin Oncol, 28 (2010), pp. 1963-1972
[10]
G Lu, P Zhu, M Rao, N Linendoll, LM Buja, MB Bhattacharjee, et al.
Postmortem study of organ-specific toxicity in glioblastoma patients treated with a combination of temozolomide, irinotecan and bevacizumab.
J Neurooncol, 160 (2022), pp. 221-231
[11]
PY Wen, SM Chang, MJ Van den Bent, MA Vogelbaum, DR Macdonald, EQ. Lee.
Response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials.
J Clin Oncol, 35 (2017), pp. 2439-2449
[12]
DS Hong, SG DuBois, S Kummar, AF Farago, CM Albert, KS Rohrberg, et al.
Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials.
Lancet Oncol, 21 (2020), pp. 531-540
[13]
M Javle, S Roychowdhury, RK Kelley, S Sadeghi, T Macarulla, KH Weiss, et al.
Infigratinib (BGJ398) in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: mature results from a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 6 (2021), pp. 803-815
[14]
DN Louis, A Perry, P Wesseling, DJ Brat, IA Cree, D Figarella-Branger, et al.
The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary.
Neuro Oncol, 23 (2021), pp. 1231-1251

These two authors contributed to this work equally.

Copyright © 2024. HCFMUSP
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos