metricas
covid
Buscar en
Clinics
Toda la web
Inicio Clinics Prognostic model on pregnancy outcomes for women with recurrent spontaneous abor...
Journal Information
Vol. 79. (In progress)
(January - December 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
433
Vol. 79. (In progress)
(January - December 2024)
Original articles
Full text access
Prognostic model on pregnancy outcomes for women with recurrent spontaneous abortions treated with cyclosporin A: A single-institution experience
Visits
433
Ze-Ming Zhang, Na Zhang, Xiao-Fei Wang
Corresponding author
wangxf@sj-hospital.org

Corresponding author.
Department of Rheumatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
Highlights

  • The prognostic model for pregnancy outcomes was constructed.

  • The prognostic factors included age, ANA, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody levels.

  • The prognostic models showed higher value for predicting pregnancy success.

This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (2)
Table 1. The baseline characteristics of included patients according to disease status.
Table 2. Logistic regression for the prognostic factors for pregnancy success.
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Background

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for pregnancy outcomes and construct a prognostic model for pregnancy outcomes in women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions (RSA) treated with cyclosporin A.

Methods

A total of 154 RSA patients treated with cyclosporin A between October 2016 and October 2018 were retrospectively recruited. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in RSA women treated with cyclosporin A. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to construct prognostic value, and the prognostic performance was assessed using area under the ROC.

Results

After adjusting potential confounding factors, the authors noted increased age (OR = 0.771; 95 % CI 0.693‒0.858; p < 0.001) and positive antinuclear antibodies (OR = 0.204; 95 % CI 0.079‒0.526; p = 0.001) were associated with a reduced incidence of pregnancy success, while positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibody (OR = 21.941; 95 % CI 1.176‒409.281; p = 0.039) was associated with an increased incidence of pregnancy success after treated with cyclosporin A. The AUC of combining these variables for predicting pregnancy failure was 0.809 (95 % CI 0.735‒0.880).

Conclusions

This study systematically identified the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in women treated with cyclosporin A, and the constructed prognostic model based on these factors with relatively higher prognostic value. Further large-scale prospective studies should be performed to validate the prognostic value of the constructed model.

Keywords:
Recurrent spontaneous abortion
Cyclosporin A
Pregnancy outcome
Prognostic factor
Retrospective
Full Text
Introduction

Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion (RSA) is defined as two or more spontaneous pregnancy losses before 20 weeks of gestation with the same sexual partner and is regarded as a common obstetric complication in the early pregnancy stage. 1 The morbidity of RSA ranges from 2–4 %, with 80 % of cases taking place in the first trimester.2 The pathogenesis of RSA occurrence in the first trimester is more complicated than that in the second trimester, and the etiologic factors remain unidentified in nearly 50 % of RSA cases occurring in the first trimester.3 Immune-related RSA can be divided into alloimmune and autoimmune types based on maternal immunological factors.4 The alloimmune type is defined as Unexplained RSA (URSA) and is related to an imbalance of maternal-fetal immune tolerance, which accounts for a nearly 50 % incidence rate in RSA.5 In contrast, autoimmune RSA is caused by autoimmune diseases and is significantly related to autoimmune factors.6

The balance between immune tolerance and effector immunity is significantly related to successful pregnancy, and an imbalance in the regulatory system can cause adverse reproductive outcomes. Cyclosporine A (CsA), isolated from metabolites of Trichoderma polysporum and Cladospora, can inhibit autoimmune responses.7 The use of CsA can regulate maternal-fetal immunity by inhibiting maternal immune rejection of embryonic antigens and promoting the growth, movement, and invasion of trophoblast cells, and thus it is considered an effective drug for the treatment of RSA.8 The use of conventional doses of prednisone and CsA in pregnant patients following organ transplantation has been established as safe for fetuses and newborns.7

Several studies have addressed the effects of CsA on pregnancy outcomes.9-11 A study by Li et al. found that low-dose CsA promotes the proliferation, invasion, and migration of villous trophoblast cells, allowing successful implantation to be achieved.9 Further, Azizi et al. found that the use of CsA in women with RSA with an elevated TH1/TH2 ratio was significantly associated with an elevated live birth rate and improved TH1/TH2 ratio.10 Moreover, the use of CsA has been shown to improve embryo implantation and pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.11 However, the rate of failure in pregnancy outcomes for RSA women treated with CsA remains high, and the prognostic factors require identification for further management and improvement of pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, the current retrospective study was performed to identify the prognostic factors and construct prognostic model for pregnancy outcomes in RSA women treated with CsA.

Materials and methodsStudy design and patients

This retrospective cohort study recruited 209 patients with RSA who were admitted to the present study's hospital between October 2016 and October 2018. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (nº 2022PS014K), and informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective design of the current study. All patients were treated with CsA, with 25 mg bid per day from the preparation for pregnancy until 12 weeks of gestation or abortion. The preparation of pregnancy will be followed by a one-year pre-pregnancy phase, and if participants do not become pregnant within that year, their treatment and participation will be terminated. The additional inclusion criteria are as follows: 1) Continued spontaneous abortion or unexplained fetal arrest and death occurred in utero more than two times; and 2) Neither partner was consanguineous and had normal karyotypes. After removing patients with incomplete clinical data, 154 were ultimately selected for analysis.

Data collection

The characteristics of the recruited patients were collected using a predefined questionnaire and medical records. Collected variables included age, disease status (Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion complicated with Rheumatism [RRSA] and URSA), Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA), Anti-Cardiolipin Antibodies (ACA), β2-glycoprotein, Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), anti-α-lined protein antibody, anti-Sjogren Syndrome A antibody (anti-SSA antibody), anti-Sjogren Syndrome B antibody (anti-SSB antibody), complement, Immunoglobulin (Ig), platelet aggregation rate, thrombelastogram, Antithrombin III activity (AT-IIIA), IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, Th/Ts, Natural Killer Cell (NK), and B cell percentages. The RRSA was defined as RSA complicated with autoimmune diseases, including positive antinuclear antibodies, anti-thyroid antibodies, or antiphospholipid antibodies. The URSA was defined after removing other causes of RSA, including abnormalities of the uterus or cervix, chromosomal abnormalities, infections, endocrine and metabolic diseases, congenital thrombophilia, autoimmune diseases, and others.

Outcome definition

Pregnancy success was defined as the occurrence of uneventful pregnancies that were spontaneously conceived, resulting in the delivery of a live baby following treatment. Pregnancy failure was defined as the termination of pregnancy and failure to deliver a live baby due to abortion, fetal arrest, fetal death, or other reasons following treatment.

Statistical analysis

The characteristics of patients according to pregnancy outcome are shown as means (standard deviation) or medians (quartile) for continuous variables according to data distribution, while categorical variables are shown as events (frequency). The differences between groups were assessed using a t-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, whereas the Chi-Square test was applied to assess the differences in categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify the prognostic factors of pregnancy success in women treated with CsA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95 % Confidence Interval (95 % CI) were calculated to assess the prognostic values of the constructed model. Exploratory analyses were performed according to disease status. All reported p-values were 2-sided, and the inspection level was set at 0.05. Statistical analysis in this study was performed using SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS 19.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

ResultsGeneral characteristics

A total of 154 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 33.24 years. The characteristics of patients according to disease status are shown in Table 1. There were significant differences between URSA and RRSA for ANA (p < 0.001), anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibodies (p = 0.002), anti-SSA antibodies (p < 0.001), and anti-SSB antibody (p = 0.043). However, there were no significant differences between URSA and RRSA for ACA (p = 0.108), LA (p = 0.136), anti-α-lined protein antibody (p = 0.267), lower complement (p = 0.803), elevated Ig (p = 0.869), age (p = 0.466), platelet aggregation rate (p = 0.228), thrombelastogram (p = 0.315), AT-IIIA (p = 0.244), IL-2 (p = 0.144), IL-4 (p = 0.269), IL-6 (p = 0.504), IL-10 (p = 0.615), IL-17 (p = 0.299), INF-γ (p = 0.857), TNF-α (p = 0.758), Th/Ts (p = 0.104), NK (p = 0.961), B-cell percentage (p = 0.308) and pregnancy outcome (p = 0.302).

Table 1.

The baseline characteristics of included patients according to disease status.

Variable  URSA (n = 117)  RRSA (n = 37)  p-value 
ANA      < 0.001 
Negative  96 (82.05)  18 (48.65)   
Positive  21 (17.95)  19 (51.35)   
ACA      0.108 
Negative  112 (95.73)  32 (86.49)   
Positive  5 (4.27)  5 (13.51)   
Anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibodies      0.002 
Negative  114 (97.44)  30 (81.08)   
Positive  3 (2.56)  7 (18.92)   
LA      0.136 
Negative  79 (67.52)  20 (54.05)   
Positive  38 (32.48)  17 (45.95)   
Anti-α-lined protein antibody      0.267 
Negative  84 (71.79)  23 (62.16)   
Positive  33 (28.21)  14 (37.84)   
Anti-SSA antibody      < 0.001 
Negative  115 (98.29)  30 (81.08)   
Positive  2 (1.71)  7 (18.92)   
Anti-SSB antibody      0.043 
Negative  116 (99.15)  34 (91.89)   
Positive  1 (0.85)  3 (8.11)   
Lower complement      0.803 
No  105 (89.74)  32 (86.49)   
Yes  12 (10.26)  5 (13.51)   
Elevated Ig      0.869 
No  111 (94.87)  36 (97.30)   
Yes  6 (5.13)  1 (2.70)   
Age (years)  33.00 (30.00, 36.00)  33.00 (30.00, 35.00)  0.466 
Platelet aggregation rate  85.40 (76.70, 89.20)  84.70 (13.00, 88.00)  0.228 
Thrombelastogram  5.00 (4.60, 5.60)  5.20 (4.60, 5.70)  0.315 
AT_IIIA (%)  103.22 (10.62)  105.59 (11.17)  0.244 
IL_2 (pg/mL)  1.41 (1.09, 1.74)  1.54 (1.36, 1.84)  0.144 
IL_4 (pg/mL)  1.68 (1.35, 2.15)  1.93 (1.48, 2.37)  0.269 
IL_6 (pg/mL)  2.14 (1.62, 2.94)  2.18 (1.83, 2.91)  0.504 
IL_10 (pg/mL)  1.79 (1.53,2.11)  1.87 (1.56,2.13)  0.615 
IL_17 (pg/mL)  7.62 (6.17, 9.71)  7.39 (5.46, 9.14)  0.299 
INF-γ (pg/mL)  1.89 (1.53, 2.40)  1.96 (1.62, 2.34)  0.857 
TNF-α (pg/mL)  2.31 (1.70,3.18)  2.38 (1.73,3.79)  0.758 
Th/Ts  1.52 (1.19,2.10)  1.35 (1.01,1.87)  0.104 
NK (%)  14.70 (11.50, 20.70)  16.20 (9.30, 21.80)  0.961 
B cell percent (%)  11.70 (9.80, 14.90)  13.50 (10.00, 15.80)  0.308 
Pregnancy outcome      0.302 
Failure  39 (33.33)  9 (24.32)   
Success  78 (66.67)  28 (75.68)   
Prognostic factors for pregnancy success after CsA treatment

The prognostic factors identified for pregnancy success after CsA treatment using multivariate logistic regression are shown in Table 2. When the full model logistic regression was performed, the authors noted the pregnancy success could affected by increased age (OR = 0.728; 95 % CI 0.636‒0.833; p < 0.001), positive ANA (OR = 0.074; 95 % CI 0.019‒0.287; p < 0.001), positive ACA (OR = 0.131; 95 % CI 0.020‒0.845; p = 0.033), and anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibody (OR = 28.308; 95 % CI 2.023‒396.114; p = 0.013). When applied step-wise logistic regression, the authors noted that increased age (OR = 0.771; 95 % CI 0.693‒0.858; p < 0.001) and positive ANA (OR = 0.204; 95 % CI 0.079‒0.526; p = 0.001) were associated with a reduced incidence of pregnancy success, whereas positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibody was associated with an increased incidence of pregnancy success (OR = 21.941; 95 % CI 1.176‒409.281; p = 0.039). The AUC of combining these variables in stepwise logistic regression for predicting pregnancy success was 0.809 (95 % CI 0.735‒0.880); (Fig. 1).

Table 2.

Logistic regression for the prognostic factors for pregnancy success.

Variable  Full modeStep wise
  OR (95 % CI)  p‒value  OR (95 % CI)  p-value 
Age (years)  0.728 (0.636‒0.833)  <0.001  0.771 (0.693‒0.858)  <0.001 
ANA  0.074 (0.019‒0.287)  <0.001  0.204 (0.079‒0.526)  0.001 
ACA  0.131 (0.020‒0.845)  0.033  0.188 (0.034‒1.049)  0.057 
Anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibodies  28.308 (2.023‒396.114)  0.013  21.941 (1.176‒409.281)  0.039 
LA  1.275 (0.448‒3.624)  0.649     
Anti-α-lined protein antibody  1.293 (0.456‒3.669)  0.629     
Anti-SSA antibody  3.228 (0.347‒29.992)  0.303     
Anti-SSB antibody  12.173 (0.188‒789.978)  0.240     
Lower complement  1.930 (0.362‒10.294)  0.441     
Elevated Ig  0.129 (0.014‒1.179)  0.070  0.202 (0.032‒1.292)  0.091 
Platelet aggregation rate  0.990 (0.976‒1.005)  0.192     
Thrombelastogram  1.451 (0.815‒2.583)  0.206     
AT_IIIA (%)  0.999(0.954‒1.045)  0.957     
IL_2 (pg/mL)  0.639 (0.369‒1.105)  0.109     
IL_4 (pg/mL)  1.166 (0.571‒2.383)  0.674     
IL_6 (pg/mL)  1.066 (0.723‒1.570)  0.748     
IL_10 (pg/mL)  1.140 (0.412‒3.159)  0.801     
IL_17 (pg/mL)  0.981 (0.817‒1.179)  0.842     
INF-γ (pg/mL)  1.630 (0.946‒2.807)  0.078     
TNF-α (pg/mL)  1.134 (0.873‒1.474)  0.345     
Th/Ts  1.605 (0.742‒3.469)  0.229     
NK (%)  0.948 (0.882‒1.019)  0.149     
B cell percent (%)  0.948 (0.852‒1.055)  0.325     
Fig. 1.

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting pregnancy success.

(0.09MB).
The prognostic factors for pregnancy success in URSA and RRSA

The pregnancy success rate following treatment with CsA in RRSA patients was higher than that in URSA patients (75.68 % vs. 66.67 %), while the difference in this value between patients with RRSA and URSA was not statistically significant.

The characteristics of the included URSA patients according to pregnancy outcomes are shown in Table S1. There were significant differences between pregnancy failure and pregnancy success in URSA patients with respect to age (p < 0.001) and ANA (p = 0.002), while no other significant differences between groups were observed. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that increased age (OR = 0.809; 95 % CI 0.725‒0.902; p < 0.001), positive ANA (OR = 0.158; 95 % CI 0.051‒0.487; p = 0.001), and positive ACA (OR = 0.089; 95 % CI 0.010‒0.797; p = 0.001) were associated with a reduced incidence of pregnancy success (Table S2). The AUC of combining these variables for predicting pregnancy success in patients with URSA was 0.779 (95 % CI 0.689‒0.870); (Fig. S1).

The characteristics of the included RRSA patients according to pregnancy outcomes are shown in Table S3. The pregnancy failure group was significantly older than the pregnancy success group (p = 0.004), while no other significant difference was observed. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that older age was associated with a lower incidence of pregnancy success (OR = 0.683; 95 % CI 0.512‒0.910; p = 0.009; Table S4). The AUC of combining these variables for predicting pregnancy success in RRSA patients was 0.823 (95 % CI 0.655‒0.990); (Fig. S2).

In the planning stage, changes in NK should be analyzed for patients before and after treatment with CsA. However, only 49 patients reported NK before and after CsA treatment. The percentage of NK cells before and after treatment with CsA was 20.31 % and 15.38 %, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (−4.93 %; p < 0.05).

Discussion

CsA is widely used as an immunosuppressant for organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases. Animal studies have shown that low doses can induce maternal-fetal immune tolerance and enhance trophoblast invasion. CsA is used to prevent and resist graft-vs.-host reactions and no adverse reactions to fetuses have been found in pregnant patients who take conventional doses of CsA for an extended time following organ transplantation.12 Previous studies have addressed the treatment effects of CsA in women with RSA.11,13 For example, Fu et al. recruited 168 refractory immune RSA patients treated with CsA (2‒4 mg/kg), and maintenance of 80‒150 mg/L CsA was associated with an elevated live birth rate.13 Ling et al. identified 86 URSA patients treated with 100 mg/day for 12 weeks, which increased the live birth rate, and no adverse events were detected.11 These results suggest that CsA should be considered an effective treatment for URSA. However, the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in women taking CsA remain controversial. The current retrospective study recruited 154 women treated with CsA, and the characteristics of the included patients varied widely. The pregnancy success rate in RSA patients treated with CsA was 68.83 %, and the incidence of pregnancy success can be affected by age, ANA, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody, and the prognostic performance of the constructed model based on these factors was relatively higher. Subgroup analyses found the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in URSA women included age, positive ANA, and positive ACA, and the prognostic value of the prognostic model based on these factors was moderate. Moreover, the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in RRSA women included increased age, and the prognostic value was higher for predicting further pregnancy success.

Several studies have previously addressed the prognostic factors of pregnancy outcomes in patients with RSA.14,15 One retrospective study by Yang et al. recruited 492 singleton pregnant women and found that a history of first-trimester RSA was an independent risk factor for cesarean section and pregnancy complications.14 Additionally, Liu et al. conducted a retrospective study of 1240 pregnant women with a history of RSA and found that a cutoff value of serum β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin of 88,000 IU/L could predict early pregnancy outcomes.15 Maesawa et al. recruited 175 women with RSA and found that two or more biochemical pregnancies were associated with an increased risk of reproductive failure and spontaneous abortion with normal chromosomes, together with a lower chance of live birth.16 In another study, Caetano et al. performed a case-control study and found that age > 40-years, immunological factors, and two or more concomitant factors were significantly related to poor gestational outcomes in women.17 Kruse et al. recruited 217 women with URSA and found that low maternal serum mannan-binding lectin levels could affect pregnancy outcomes for women with URSA.18 However, the prognostic factors for pregnancy success in women with RSA treated with CsA have not yet been identified. Therefore, the authors performed this retrospective study to identify prognostic factors for pregnancy outcomes for RSA women treated with CsA.

Increased age and ANA positivity were associated with a reduced incidence of pregnancy success in this study, which aligns with the existing evidence that maternal age is an independent predictor of poor maternal and fetal outcomes during pregnancy.19 The prevalence of ANA has previously been demonstrated to be higher in recurrent pregnancy loss, and positive ANA results are associated with an increased risk of miscarriage.20 Moreover, the disappearance of ANA in early pregnancy is associated with ongoing pregnancy, which indicates an improvement in systemic autoimmunity.21 The pregnancy success group presented with higher positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibody rates in this study. As β2-glycoprotein functions as a physiologic anticoagulant by inhibiting the key procoagulant activities of thrombin,22 pregnancy outcomes could be affected. The results of the present study found that positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibody patients treated with CsA were associated with an increased incidence of pregnancy success, which suggests the use of CsA could offer more benefit for patients who presented positive anti-β2 glycoprotein-I-antibody. The result might not have been stable owing to the marginal 95 % CI, and further prospective studies are needed to verify this finding.

Another study previously found that an imbalance of Th/Ts plays an important role in the progression of RSA.23 Villous trophoblast cells at the maternal/fetal interface initiate and complete uterine placental circulation, secreting a variety of cytokines to maintain the Th1 /Th2 cell balance. Once this balance is disrupted, the fetus is attacked and miscarried.24 IFN-γ, IL4, IL13 and other cytokines secreted by Th1 and Th2 cells interact with each other to maintain maternal immune tolerance to the fetus and ensure fetal growth and development during pregnancy, while Th1 cells oversecrete IFN-γ, which can damage trophoblast cells by inducing activated NK cells, hindering embryo implantation and placental growth and development, and thus lead to abortion.25 The use of CsA may restore the balance of Th/Ts, which could explain why Th/Ts was not associated with the incidence of pregnancy success in the present study.26

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, it was designed as a retrospective cohort, and the results could, therefore, have been affected by selection and recall biases. Second, the background treatment strategies for RSA patients differ, which could affect the pregnancy outcomes. Third, the severity of RSA could affect pregnancy outcomes, which were not addressed in this study. Fourth, it remains unclear whether the RSA is caused by alloimmunological factors, which should be further explored. Finally, stratified analyses were only performed based on disease status, whereas based on several other important factors were not performed.

Conclusions

The findings of this study showed that age, ANA, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody levels were significantly associated with the incidence of pregnancy success, and the prognostic models for these variables showed higher value for predicting pregnancy success in women treated with CsA. Further large-scale prospective studies should be performed to verify the results of this study and validate the constructed prognostic model.

Funding

This study was not funded by any organization.

Data Sharing

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ze-Ming Zhang: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. Na Zhang: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Xiao-Fei Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

References
[1]
WA Hogge, AL Byrnes, MC Lanasa, U. Surti.
The clinical use of karyotyping spontaneous abortions.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189 (2003),
[2]
JL Allison, DJ. Schust.
Recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss: revised definitions and novel causes.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes, 16 (2009), pp. 446-450
[3]
S D'Ippolito, C Ticconi, C Tersigni, S Garofalo, C Martino, A Lanzone, et al.
The pathogenic role of autoantibodies in recurrent pregnancy loss.
Am J Reprod Immunol, 83 (2020), pp. e13200
[4]
JP Bilibio, TB Gama, ICM Nascimento, AJC Meireles, ASC de Aguiar, FC do Nascimento, et al.
Causes of recurrent miscarriage after spontaneous pregnancy and after in vitro fertilization.
Am J Reprod Immunol, 83 (2020), pp. e13226
[5]
L Luo, X Zeng, Z Huang, S Luo, L Qin, S. Li.
Reduced frequency and functional defects of CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(low/-) regulatory T cells in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 18 (2020), pp. 62
[6]
VO Rodrigues, A Soligo, GD. Pannain.
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and infertility.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 41 (2019), pp. 621-627
[7]
N Zaffar, E Soete, S Gandhi, P Sayyar, T Van Mieghem, R D'Souza.
Pregnancy outcomes following single and repeat liver transplantation: An international 2-center cohort.
Liver Transpl, 24 (2018), pp. 769-778
[8]
WH Zhou, L Dong, MR Du, XY Zhu, DJ. Li.
Cyclosporin A improves murine pregnancy outcome in abortion-prone matings: involvement of CD80/86 and CD28/CTLA-4.
Reproduction, 135 (2008), pp. 385-395
[9]
MR Du, L Dong, WH Zhou, FT Yan, DJ. Li.
Cyclosporin a improves pregnancy outcome by promoting functions of trophoblasts and inducing maternal tolerance to the allogeneic fetus in abortion-prone matings in the mouse.
Biol Reprod, 76 (2007), pp. 906-914
[10]
R Azizi, M Ahmadi, S Danaii, S Abdollahi-Fard, P Mosapour, S Eghbal-Fard, et al.
Cyclosporine A improves pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and elevated Th1/Th2 ratio.
J Cell Physiol, 234 (2019), pp. 19039-19047
[11]
Y Ling, Y Huang, C Chen, J Mao, H Zhang.
Low dose cyclosporin A treatment increases live birth rate of unexplained recurrent abortion - initial cohort study.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 44 (2017), pp. 230-235
[12]
JH. Fu.
Analysis of the use of cyclosporin A to treat refractory immune recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 42 (2015), pp. 739-742
[13]
J Fu, X Zhu, H Sun, L Zhao.
A randomized controlled trial of cyclosporine A in the treatment of refractory immune recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Chin J Pract Gynecol Obst, (2016), pp. 5441-5445
[14]
J Yang, Y Wang, XY Wang, YY Zhao, J Wang, YY Zhao.
Adverse pregnancy outcomes of patients with history of first-trimester recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Biomed Res Int, (2017),
[15]
Y Liu, Y Liu, X Li, X Jiao, R Zhang, J. Zhang.
Predictive value of serum beta-hCG for early pregnancy outcomes among women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 135 (2016), pp. 16-21
[16]
Y Maesawa, H Yamada, M Deguchi, Y. Ebina.
History of biochemical pregnancy was associated with the subsequent reproductive failure among women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Gynecol Endocrinol, 31 (2015), pp. 306-308
[17]
MR Caetano, E Couto, R Passini Jr., RZ Simoni, R Barini.
Gestational prognostic factors in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Sao Paulo Med J, 124 (2006), pp. 181-185
[18]
C Kruse, A Rosgaard, R Steffensen, K Varming, JC Jensenius, OB. Christiansen.
Low serum level of mannan-binding lectin is a determinant for pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 187 (2002), pp. 1313-1320
[19]
M Rezk, O Elkilani, A Shaheen, A Gamal, H. Badr.
Maternal hemodynamic changes and predictors of poor obstetric outcome in women with rheumatic heart disease: a five-year observational study.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 31 (2018), pp. 1542-1547
[20]
R Sakthiswary, S Rajalingam, MR Norazman, H. Hussein.
Antinuclear antibodies predict a higher number of pregnancy loss in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
Clin Ter, 166 (2015), pp. e98-101
[21]
C Ticconi, A Pietropolli, B Borelli, V Bruno, E Piccione, S Bernardini, et al.
Antinuclear autoantibodies and pregnancy outcome in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
Am J Reprod Immunol, 76 (2016), pp. 396-399
[22]
N Pozzi, L Acquasaliente, R Frasson, A Cristiani, S Moro, A Banzato, et al.
beta2 -Glycoprotein I binds to thrombin and selectively inhibits the enzyme procoagulant functions.
J Thromb Haemost, 11 (2013), pp. 1093-1102
[23]
S Hayakawa, M Karasaki-Suzuki, T Itoh, M Ishii, T Kanaeda, N Nagai, et al.
Effects of paternal lymphocyte immunization on peripheral Th1/Th2 balance and TCR V beta and V gamma repertoire usage of patients with recurrent spontaneous abortions.
Am J Reprod Immunol, 43 (2000), pp. 107-115
[24]
J Luo, Y Wang, Q Qi, Y Cheng, W Xu, J. Yang.
Sinomenine improves embryo survival by regulating Th1/Th2 balance in a mouse model of recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Med Sci Monit, (2021),
[25]
SC Ng, A Gilman-Sachs, P Thaker, KD Beaman, AE Beer, J. Kwak-Kim.
Expression of intracellular Th1 and Th2 cytokines in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion, implantation failures after IVF/ET or normal pregnancy.
Am J Reprod Immunol, 48 (2002), pp. 77-86
[26]
M Ge, X Zhao, Y Zhao, X. Feng.
Research progress of cyclosporine A treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion.
J Int Reprod Health/Fam Plan, (2021), pp. 40514-40518
Copyright © 2024. HCFMUSP
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos