metricas
covid
Buscar en
Neurología (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Neurología (English Edition) Correlation between demyelinating lesions and executive function decline in a sa...
Información de la revista
Vol. 28. Núm. 7.
Páginas 394-399 (septiembre 2013)
Visitas
3603
Vol. 28. Núm. 7.
Páginas 394-399 (septiembre 2013)
Original article
Acceso a texto completo
Correlation between demyelinating lesions and executive function decline in a sample of Mexican patients with multiple sclerosis
Correlación entre las lesiones desmielinizantes y el deterioro de las funciones ejecutivas en una muestra de pacientes mexicanos con esclerosis múltiple
Visitas
3603
V.R. Aldrete Corteza,
Autor para correspondencia
valdrete@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, E. Duriez-Sotelob, P. Carrillo-Morac, J.A. Pérez-Zunob
a Departamento de Neurología del desarrollo, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Montes Urales 800, Col Virreyes, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, México, DF, Mexico
b Departamento de Neurología, Hospital CIMA, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, México, Mexico
c Servicio de Rehabilitación Neurológica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Calz. México-Xochimilco, México, DF, Mexico
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (4)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (2)
Table 1. Demographic data for the 21 patients with MS.
Table 2. Number of patients classified in each dimension of the WCST according to typical scores.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract
Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterised by several neurological symptoms including cognitive impairment, which has recently been the subject of considerable study. At present, evidence pointing to a correlation between lesion characteristics and specific cognitive impairment is not conclusive.

Objective

To investigate the presence of a correlation between the characteristics of demyelinating lesions and performance of basic executive functions in a sample of MS patients.

Material and methods

We included 21 adult patients with scores of 0 to 5 on the Kurtzke scale and no exacerbations of the disease in at least 3 months prior to the evaluation date. They completed the Stroop test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The location of the lesions was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed by a blinded expert in neuroimaging.

Results

Demyelinating lesions were more frequently located in the frontal and occipital lobes. The Stroop test showed that as cognitive demand increased on each of the sections in the test, reaction time and number of errors increased. On the WCST, 33.33% of patients registered as having moderate cognitive impairment. No correlation could be found between demyelinating lesion characteristics (location, size, and number) and patients’ scores on the tests.

Conclusion

Explanations of the causes of cognitive impairment in MS should examine a variety of biological, psychological, and social factors instead of focusing solely on demyelinating lesions.

Keywords:
Multiple sclerosis
Cognitive impairment
Executive functions
Demyelinating lesions
Neuropsychology
Mexico
Resumen
Antecedentes

La Esclerosis Múltiple (EM) se caracteriza por una gran diversidad de síntomas neurológicos de entre los cuales el deterioro cognitivo recientemente ha cobrado una especial relevancia. Hasta el momento la evidencia acerca de una correlación entre las características de las lesiones y el deterioro cognitivo específico aún no es concluyente.

Objetivo

Analizar si existe una correlación entre las características de las lesiones desmielinizantes y el desempeño de las funciones ejecutivas básicas en estos pacientes.

Pacientes y Métodos

Se incluyeron 21 pacientes adultos con puntaje de 0-5 en la escala de Kurtzke, sin exacerbaciones de la enfermedad en los 3 meses previos a la evaluación. Se les aplicaron las pruebas de Stroop, y el Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). La localización de las lesiones fue determinada por Resonancia Magnética por un observador experto y cegado

Resultados

Las lesiones desmielinizantes se distribuyeron con mayor frecuencia en los lóbulos occipitales y frontales. En el Stroop se observó que, a medida que se incrementa la demanda cognitiva en cada sección de la prueba, aumentan el tiempo de reacción y el número de errores. En el WCST, un 33.33% presentó un deterioro medio a moderado. No se encontró una relación entre la lesiones desmielinizantes – localización, tamaño y suma total – y los puntajes de las pruebas aplicadas.

Conclusión

En la explicación del deterioro cognitivo en la EM, se deben considerar no sólo a las lesiones desmielinizantes sino también otros factores biológicos, psicológicos y sociales.

Palabras clave:
Esclerosis múltiple
Deterioro cognitivo
Funciones ejecutivas
Lesiones desmielinizantes
Neuropsicología
México
Texto completo
Introduction

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterised by the relapsing appearance of multiple demyelinating lesions in the white matter. Lesions show mild axonal damage at onset and severe damage in advanced stages of the disease.1,2 MS is clinically characterised by episodes of very diverse types of neurological dysfunction, including motor, sensory, visual, cerebellar, and other deficits.2 Among its many clinical manifestations, cognitive and psychiatric symptoms have recently attracted attention due to their involvement in the disability associated with this disease.3,4

Studies indicate that between 40% and 65% of patients with MS experience neuropsychological alterations.5 Changes are considered to be severe in 6% to 10% of all cases, and contribute significantly to patients’ levels of disability.6 Although neuropsychological alterations are more common in the later stages of secondary progressive MS, researchers have also described cognitive impairment in early stages of relapsing MS.4,7 The most frequently affected cognitive functions in this disease are attention, long-term memory, verbal information processing speed, and executive functions (EF).1,5

It is especially interesting to analyse EF performance, since EFs are tertiary cognitive processes that regulate the more basic cognitive functions involved in patients’ activities of daily life. These processes are often impaired in patients with MS.8,9 Some authors have even stated that inhibition is perhaps the most frequently altered function in these patients.10 Defining the cognitive processes involved in EFs is a theoretical problem, since EF is usually understood as an umbrella category including all higher-level processes. On the other hand, authors such as Miyake et al. propose a model in which EF has 3 main components: inhibition, flexibility, and working memory.11 The inhibition of prevailing responses or irrelevant stimuli has been widely and effectively examined using the Stroop test.12 In addition, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is considered a useful tool for assessing cognitive flexibility.8,11 Working memory may also be analysed by using modified versions of the Stroop Test requiring temporary retention of information. We therefore propose this brief evaluation with the aim of assessing basic EF performance.

Researchers have previously attempted to correlate cognitive deterioration in MS patients with such different clinical variables as progression timeline, educational level, age, sex, depressive symptoms, etc. However, many authors found no significant relationships.13–16 At the same time, other studies have searched for a link between neuropsychological deterioration and different characteristics of demyelinating lesions including location, size, number of lesions, and total lesion area, but no conclusive results have been found to date.17,18 Identifying any correlations between the location of demyelinating lesions and the neuropsychological deterioration of specific processes (such as basic EFs) will enable us to predict the clinical behaviour of MS patients. This will help researchers establish cognitive rehabilitation measures designed to reduce the disability stemming from this process.

Patients and methodsPatients

We included 21 patients from Hospital CIMA (Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico) with a definitive diagnosis of relapsing remitting MS according to the revised McDonald criteria19; patients were recruited consecutively. Included patients scored between 0 and 5 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). They were clinically stable at the time of evaluation (no exacerbations during the 3 months prior to recruitment) and their brain MRIs presented demyelinating lesions. Each imaging studies was performed in the 3 months prior to the patient's neuropsychological study. At time of inclusion, patients were required to have good visual acuity (20/20) in at least one eye. Additionally, they had to be undergoing treatment with subcutaneous interferon (beta-1b) dosed at 12 or 8 million units, 3 times weekly, at time of inclusion. All patients had been treated with interferon since being diagnosed with MS. Exclusion criteria were as follows: history of alcohol or drug abuse; concomitant illnesses such as epilepsy, psychiatric disorders, or other autoimmune diseases; difficulty understanding basic instructions (as shown by results from the Barcelona subtest)20; and a score of more than 11 on the Beck Depression Inventory.21 The research project and the informed consent statement were approved by the Ethics Committee at Hospital CIMA in Monterrey, Nuevo León.

Procedure

The presence of lesions was determined by MRI scans, which were completed in the 3 months prior to the study and interpreted by a blinded neuroimaging expert. MRI scans were performed using a Siemens Magneton 1.5 tesla scanner. We employed the fast spin echo technique in order to obtain T1-weighted, T2-weighted, or FLAIR images along the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. The neuropsychological evaluation was first carried out using the Stroop Color and Word Test, then the WCST, and lastly the Beck Depression Inventory.

Instruments

Instruments for the neuropsychological evaluation included the modified version of the Stroop Color and Word Test and the WCST.

We used the version of the Stroop test designed by Valdez-Ramírez, which not only evaluates inhibition as a cognitive process determining performance on the test (according to instruction sets 3 and 4),22 but also requires patients to use working memory. This is also stated in the description published by Flores-Lázaro et al.23

Valdez-Ramírez's version of the Stroop Color and Word Test employs a page-size card listing 48 words (Arial font, size 28). Words were limited to 4 colour names in Spanish (azul, café, rojo, verde) with each word printed in a colour other than that named.22 Participants are asked to produce answers as quickly as possible according to 4 sets of instructions: reading words while ignoring their print colour; naming ink colour without reading the word; reading those words marked with a dot to the left and naming the ink colour for words lacking a dot; and lastly, reversing the third procedure, that is, naming ink colour for words with a dot to the left and reading words lacking a dot. The variables included were completion time and number of errors for each of the 4 instruction sets.

For the WCST,24,25 we took into account the standardised score from the age-adjusted table, errors, perseverative responses, perseverative errors, and non-perseverative errors.

Statistical analysis

We used the Spearman rank correlation to calculate the association between cognitive performance on the Stroop/WCST tests and total number and localisation of the lesions. Correlations between lesion size, the WCST, and the Stroop tests were analysed using the chi-square test. Likewise, we used the Spearman rank correlation to examine the association between lesion size/location and the demographic variables. Values of P<.05 were considered statistically significant.26 SPSS software version 19.0 was used for data analysis.

Results

Table 1 shows general demographic data for the 21 patients included in the study. Regarding demyelinating lesions, the largest percentage of patients (23%) presented 2 lesions. The next largest percentage, 14%, was a 3-way tie between patients with 4, 7, or 9 lesions (Fig. 1). The areas most affected by demyelinating lesions were the subcortical white matter of the frontal and occipital lobes, and the periventricular region (Fig. 2). Lesions were classified as smaller and larger than 2.5cm; of the total lesions, 87% were smaller than 2.5cm and only 13% were larger than 2.5cm. As was to be expected, most of the lesions larger than 2.5 were located in the white matter of the cerebral hemispheres; brainstem lesions were quite rare.

Table 1.

Demographic data for the 21 patients with MS.

Sex  8 men 
  13 women 
Age  33 years (20–57) 
Education  15.14±3.13, 9 to 21 years 
Marital status  Married: 12 (57%) 
  Single: 8 (38%) 
  Divorced: 1 (5%) 
Occupation  Students: 2 (9.5%) 
  Professionals: 11 (52.3%) 
  Business owners: 3 (14.3%) 
Progression timeline  3.9 months (between 4 months and 19 years) 
Figure 1.

Total number of demyelinating lesions in MS patients according to the MRI scan. The MRI showed only 2 lesions in most patients.

(0.06MB).
Figure 2.

Distribution of the anatomical localisations of the demyelinating lesions identified by the MRI. Most of the patients’ demyelinating lesions were located in the subcortical white matter of the occipital/frontal lobes, or in the periventricular region.

(0.06MB).

In the modified Stroop test, the mean period of time was 23.52±6.72 for the word reading section, 61.57±18.68 for the colour naming section, 76.76±22.34 for the dotted word section, and 99.19±26.30 for the dotted colour section (Fig. 3). The mean number of errors was 0 for the word section, 2.43±3.4 for the colour section, 3.48±3.487 for the dotted word section, and 8.19±11.90 for the dotted colour section (Fig. 4). We observed that as cognitive demand increased on each of the sections, reaction time and number of errors also increased.

Figure 3.

Completion time for each section of the Stroop test.

(0.05MB).
Figure 4.

Number of errors for each section of the Stroop test.

(0.05MB).

The mean number of errors on the WCST was 85.6±17.9 (89.4±18.4 for perseverative responses; 86±17.6 for perseverative errors; and 94.1±20.1 for non-perseverative errors). According to the WCST manual, subjects from a clinical sample can be further classified in each dimension as moderate to severe impairment, moderate impairment, mild to moderate impairment, and mild impairment. In a normal sample, subjects’ performance may be classified as below the mean, at the mean, and above the mean. Based on the scoring parameters from the WCST manual mentioned above, most MS patients were at the mean or showed mild impairment on the different dimensions of the WCST test. This means that, according to the WCST test, basic EFs were slightly affected in most patients (Table 2).

Table 2.

Number of patients classified in each dimension of the WCST according to typical scores.

WCST dimensions  Moderate to severe impairment  Moderate impairment  Mild to moderate impairment  Mild impairment  Below the mean  At mean  Above the mean  Total number 
Errors  21 
Perseverative responses  21 
Perseverative errors  21 
Non-perseverative errors  21 

According to typical scores. Source: Daniels.24

WCST: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

The Spearman correlation only showed an association between the total number of lesions and the fourth dimension, dotted colour, on the Stroop test (r2=0.459, P=.036). Regarding the location of the lesion, we found a correlation between the frontal region and the dotted colour dimension on the Stroop test (r2=0.437, P=.048), and also between the occipital region and the dotted colour dimension (r2=0.543, P=.011). Regarding lesion size, the chi-square test was significant for perseverative errors χ2=0.221, P=.045.

Discussion

MS is considered to be the leading cause of disability in young adults from developed countries.27 It is estimated that up to 60% of all MS patients in Mexico present some degree of disability.28 The location, number, and size of the demyelinating lesions in our patients correspond to the results from the international and Mexican literature; the predominant lesions are those smaller than 2.5cm and those located in the periventricular and hemispheric white matter.18

The presence of cognitive impairment has traditionally been underestimated as a fundamental symptom of MS; Mexican literature reports a frequency of cognitive impairment of only 25%.28 On this subject, few Mexican studies have focused on analysing cognitive impairment in MS patients. Hernández et al. published a neuropsychological analysis of 9 patients with relapsing remitting MS and low scores on the Kurtzke Disability Status Scale. In this group, researchers found abnormal values for memory, efficiency in information processing and visuospatial tasks, and the process of creating concepts.29 Nevertheless, they did not report analysing the basic EF processes which necessarily affect more complex EFs and therefore patients’ activities of daily living as well. The present study evaluated patients with similar characteristics to those described by Hernández et al. (low scores on the EDSS and low number of lesions). We found that 33.33% had mild to moderate impairment in the area of flexibility according to the WCST test, which is especially observant of perseverative responses. In addition, more errors and a longer reaction time were observed on the Stroop dimension requiring inhibition and working memory; this was the only dimension to correlate with the total number of lesions and with those located in the frontal and occipital regions. However, we should note the correlation between the occipital region and the total number of lesions.

Some authors have found a correlation between total number of lesions (particularly those located in the frontal region) and WCST scores, and especially with perseverative responses on the test. Nevertheless, their analysis describes the WCST as an abstract and conceptual reasoning test, without mentioning flexibility.16,17,30–32 In addition, they suggest an association between demyelinating lesions and working memory only.18 We have no knowledge of any studies examining the relationship between demyelinating lesions in MS and basic EFs. Likewise, these kinds of studies may present certain limitations, especially with regard to their methods. For example, patient samples were heterogeneous, including 2 or more types of MS, in various studies.15,17,18,33 Also, some patients were in the active phase of the disease and undergoing different types of treatment.15 EDSS scores presented a wide range from 0 to 8.5 points.15,16,31,33 Some studies, including our own, did not include a control group.15,16,18,31

While this study found no correlations, this may result from the methodological deficiencies mentioned above. Correlations do not seem to be consistent with the dimensions we assessed. We should also note that structural MRI, used to calculate the number of lesions in the study, does not always provide information about the anatomical pathology and functional profile of the lesions. It is also well known that MRI shows some types of impaired tissue as if it were normal. In addition, chronic active plaques extend through the cerebral parenchyma beyond the visible limits (which may determine deafferentation between several regions), while some demyelinating lesions become chronic and silent.34,35 As a consequence, a single MRI scan does not seem to offer a good enough picture to be used as a predictor of cognitive performance in MS.36 Based on the above, demyelinating lesions cannot reliably be used as predictors of cognitive impairment.

While their effects on the patient's daily life may not be obvious, their impact is clearly detrimental. Since it is not feasible to use the total number of lesions as the only predictor, a neuropsychological assessment seems recommendable in these stages of the disease. Completing such an assessment will promote use of cognitive training and the design of programmes to stimulate processes including basic EFs, flexibility, working memory, and inhibition.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank María Eugenia Mendoza González, professor and neuropsychologist at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nuevo León; Dr Gerardo Palacios-Saucedo, researcher at hospital no. 25, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; and María de la Cruz Cortés Sobrino, professor at Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, for her valuable comments and contributions to the drafting of this text.

References
[1]
C. Arriagada, J. Nogales.
Esclerosis Múltiple una mirada ibero-panamericana.
Arrynog, (2006),
[2]
J.H. Noseworthy, C. Lucchinetti, M. Rodriguez, B.G. Weinshenker.
Multiple sclerosis.
N Engl J Med, 343 (2000), pp. 938-952
[3]
M. Deloire, A. Ruet, D. Hamel, M. Bonnet, B. Brochet.
Early cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis predicts disability outcome several years later.
Mult Scler, 16 (2010), pp. 581-587
[4]
B.I. Glanz, B.C. Healy, D.J. Rintell, S.K. Jaffin, R. Bakshi, H.L. Weiner.
The association between cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with early multiple sclerosis.
J Neurol Sci, 290 (2010), pp. 75-79
[5]
M. Calabrese, F. Agosta, F. Rinaldi, I. Mattisi, P. Grossi, A. Favoretto, et al.
Cortical lesions and atrophy associated with cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Arch Neurol, 66 (2011), pp. 1144-1150
[6]
F.R. Halligan, M. Rezinkoff, H.P. Friedman, N.G. La Rocca.
Cognitive dysfunction and change in multiple sclerosis.
J Clin Psychol, 44 (1988), pp. 540-548
[7]
M.P. Amato, V. Zipoli, E. Portaccio.
Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
J Neurol Sci, 245 (2006), pp. 41-46
[8]
J. Tirapu-Ustárroz, P. Luna-Lario.
Neuropsicología de las funciones ejecutivas.
Manual de neuropsicología, pp. 221-259
[9]
I. Introzzi, S. Urquijo, M.F. López-Ramón.
Coding processes and executive functions in multiple sclerosis.
Psicothema, 22 (2010), pp. 684-690
[10]
D.R. Denney, L.A. Sworowsky, S.G. Lynch.
Cognitive impairment in three subytpes of multiple sclerosis.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 20 (2005), pp. 967-981
[11]
A. Miyake, N.P. Friedman, M.J. Emerson, A.H. Witzi, A. Howerter.
The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex frontal lobe task; a latent variable analysis.
Cogn Psychol, 41 (2000), pp. 49-100
[12]
R.A. Barkley.
Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: construing a unifying theory of ADHD.
Psychol Bull, 121 (1997), pp. 65-94
[13]
C.H. Polman, S.C. Reingold, B. Banwell, M. Clanet, J.A. Cohen, M. Filipi, et al.
Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald Criteria.
Ann Neurol, 69 (2011), pp. 292-302
[14]
J.M. Peyser, K.R. Edwards, C.M. Poser, S.B. Flslov.
Cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Arch Neurol, 37 (1980), pp. 577-579
[15]
W.W. Beatty, D.E. Goodkin, D. Hertsgaard, N. Monson.
Clinical and demographic predictors of cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis.
Arch Neurol, 47 (1990), pp. 250-255
[16]
T. Swirsky-Sacchetti, D.R. Mitchell, J. Seward, C. González, F. Lublin, R. Knobler, et al.
Neuropsychological and structural brain lesions in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology, 42 (1992), pp. 1291-1295
[17]
S.M. Rao, G.J. Leo, V.M. Haughton, S.T. Aubin-Faubert, L. Bernardin.
Correlation of magnetic resonance imagining with neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology, 39 (1989), pp. 161-166
[18]
R.A. Sperling, C.R. Guttmann, M.J. Hohol, S.K. Warfield, M. Jakab, M. Parente, et al.
Regional magnetic resonance imaging lesion burden and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.
Arch Neurol, 58 (2001), pp. 115-121
[19]
C.H. Polman, S.C. Reingold, B. Banwell, M. Clanet, J.A. Cohen, M. Filipi, et al.
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.
Ann Neurol, 69 (2011), pp. 292-302
[20]
J. Peña-Casanova.
Subtest de comprensión de instrucciones.
Programa integrado de exploración neuropsicológica test de Barcelona, Masson, (1990),
[21]
A.T. Beck.
Causes and treatment.
Depression, University of Pennsylvania Press, (1972),
[22]
P. Valdez Ramírez.
Ritmos circadianos en los procesos atencionales del ser humano.
Tesis para obtener el grado de doctor en filosofía con especialidad en psicología. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, (2005),
[23]
J.C. Flores Lázaro, F. Ostrosky Shejet, A. Lozano Gutiérrez.
Batería de funciones ejecutivas y lóbulos frontales (BANFE).
Manual Moderno, (2012),
[24]
R.K. Heaton.
Wisconsin card scoring test manual.
Psychological Assessment Resources, (1981),
[25]
O. Monchi, M. Petrides, V. Petre, K. Worsley, A. Dagher.
Wisconsin card sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.
J Neurosci, 21 (2001), pp. 7733-7741
[26]
W. Daniels.
Análisis de Varianza.
Bioestadística, pp. 295-399
[27]
V.S. Ramagopalan, R. Dobson, U.C. Meier, G. Giovannoni.
Multiple sclerosis: risk factors, prodromes, and potential causal pathways.
Lancet Neurol, 9 (2010), pp. 727-739
[28]
M.A. Velázquez-Quintana, M.A. Macías-Islas, V. Rivera-Olmos, Lozano-Zarate.
Esclerosis múltiple en México: un estudio multicéntrico.
Rev Neurol, 36 (2003), pp. 1019-1022
[29]
B. Hernández, N. Plascencia, M.A. Villa, S. Sauri, S. Quiñones, A. Venegas, et al.
Evaluación neuropsicológica en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente recurrente con baja puntuación en la escala de Kurtske.
Rev Mex Neuroci, 9 (2008), pp. 273-277
[30]
R.H.C. Lazeron, .M.J. Sonneville, P. Scheltens, C.H. Polman, F. Barkhof.
Cognitive slowing in multiple sclerosis is strongly associated with brain volume reduction.
Mult Scler, 12 (2006), pp. 760-768
[31]
R.H.C. Lazeron, J.B. Boringa, M. Schouten, B.M.J. Uitdehaag, E. Bergers, J. Lindeboom, et al.
Brain atrophy and lesion load as explaining parameters for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis.
Mult Scler, 11 (2005), pp. 524-531
[32]
C. Pozzili, D. Passafiume, S. Bernardini, P. Pantano, C. Incoccia, Bastianelo, et al.
SPECT, MRI and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 54 (1991), pp. 110-115
[33]
I. Litvan, J. Grafman, P. Vendrell, J.M. Martinez, C. Junque, M. Vendrell, et al.
Multiple memory deficits in patients with multiple seclerosis Explrogin the working memory system.
Arch Neurol, 45 (1988), pp. 607-610
[34]
G.R. Wayne Moore.
The pathology of multiple sclerosis and related disorders.
Diagn Histopathol, 17 (2011), pp. 225-231
[35]
H. Lassmann.
Axonal and neural pathology in multiple sclerosis: what have we learnt from animals models.
[36]
A.H. Poonawalla, S. Datta, V. Juneja, F. Nelson, J.S. Wolinsky, G. Cutter, et al.
Composite MRI scores improve correlation with EDSS in multiple sclerosis.
Mult Scler, 16 (2010), pp. 1117-1125

Please cite this article as: Aldrete-Cortez VR, Duriez-Sotelo E, Carrillo-Mora P, Pérez-Zuno JA. Correlación entre las lesiones desmielinizantes y el deterioro de las funciones ejecutivas en una muestra de pacientes mexicanos con esclerosis múltiple. Neurología. 2013;28:394–399.

Copyright © 2012. Sociedad Española de Neurología
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos