covid
Buscar en
Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología Irrigación de anestésicos locales y dolor postoperatorio en pacientes sometida...
Journal Information
Vol. 36. Issue 3.
Pages 167-172 (August - October 2008)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 36. Issue 3.
Pages 167-172 (August - October 2008)
ARTÍCULO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CLÍNICA
Open Access
Irrigación de anestésicos locales y dolor postoperatorio en pacientes sometidas a mamoplastia de aumento
Visits
2303
Rosemary Jiménez Haad
, Alexandra Chaves Vega**
* Residente III. Departamento de Anestesia, Fundación Santa Fe. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
** Especialista de Anestesia. Fundación Santa Fe. Bogotá, Colombia.
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
RESUMEN
Objetivo

Determinar si la irrigación de anestésicos locales en la cavidad mamaria, en pacientes sometidas a mamoplastia de aumento, disminuye la necesidad de analgesia de rescate y la intensidad del dolor postoperatorio, medido con la escala visual análoga.

Metodología

Estudio clínico cuasiexperimental controlado con placebo. En el grupo de intervención se irrigó la cavidad mamaria con una solución de lidocaína al 1% con epinefina (7 mg/kg), bupivacaína al 0,5% (3 mg/kg) y solución salina. En el grupo control se irrigó la cavidad mamaria con solución salina. La técnica anestésica y la analgesia de transición fueron estandarizadas. Se registró el analgésico opiáceo (morfina, hidromorfona o meperidina) y la dosis total requerida como analgesia de rescate durante la estancia en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos (UCPA). Se registró la intensidad del dolor postoperatorio al recuperar la conciencia, a los treinta minutos, a la primera hora, a las dos, a las cinco y a las veinticuatro horas del postoperatorio.

Resultados

Se encontró diferencia en el número de pacientes que requirieron analgesia de rescate con morfina en la UCPA (p<0,01), 10% en el grupo de intervención versus 50% en el grupo control. También se encontró diferencia en la intensidad del dolor (p<0,01).

Conclusiones

La irrigación de anestésicos locales en la cavidad mamaria en pacientes sometidas a mamoplastia de aumento disminuye la necesidad de analgesia de rescate con opiáceos y la intensidad del dolor postoperatorio.

Palabras clave:
mamoplastia de aumento
analgesia
escala visual análoga
lidocaína
bupivacaína
SUMMARY
Objective

To determine if the irrigation of the breast cavity with local anesthetics in patients who undergo breast augmentation surgery reduces rescue analgesic requirements and postoperatory pain intensity level, measured with the analogue visual scale.

Methods

Placebo controlled non randomized clinical trial. In the intervention group the breast cavity was irrigated with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (7 mg/kg), 0,5% bupivacaine (3 mg/kg) and normal saline solution. In the second group the breast cavity was irrigated with saline solution. Anesthetic and transition analgesia techniques were standardized. Type (morphine, hydromorphone and meperidine) and total required dose of opioid rescue analgesic medication in the Post Anesthetic Care Unit were also registered. Postoperative pain intensity level was also registered at the moment of consciousness recovery, at thirty minutes, at the first hour, at two, five and twenty four hours of postoperative period.

Results

There was a difference in the number of patients requiring opioid rescue analgesia with morphine at the Post Anesthetic Care Unit (p<0.01), 10% in the intervention group versus 50% in the control group. Likewise, there was difference inpain intensity level (p<0.01).

Conclusions

Local anesthetic irrigation in patients who underwent breast augmentation surgery reduces opioid rescue analgesia requirements and postoperative pain intensity level.

Key words:
Breast augmentation surgery
analgesia
Visual Analogue Scale
lidocaine
bupivacaine
Full text is only aviable in PDF
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
[1.]
D.B. Sarwer, J.E. Nordmann, J.D. Herbert.
Cosmetic breast augmentation surgery: A critical overview.
J. Women's Health Gend Based Med., 9 (2000), pp. 843-856
[2.]
M.S. Wallace, A.M. Wallace, J. Lee, M.K. Dobke.
Pain after breast surgery: A survey of 282 women.
Pain., 66 (1996), pp. 195-205
[3.]
J.P. Frysek, L.B. Signorello, L. Hakelius, N. Feltelius, A. Ringberg, W.J. Blot.
Self-reported symptoms among women after cosmetic breast implant and breast reduction surgery.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 108 (2001), pp. 2165-2168
[4.]
J.M. Gryskiewicz.
Avoiding pain and suffering after breast augmentation.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 110 (2002), pp. 1812-1813
[5.]
M.I. Brar, J.B. Tebbetts.
Early return to normal activities after breast augmentation.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 110 (2002), pp. 1193-1194
[6.]
P.T. Pacik, C. Wemer.
Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: The use of indwelling catheters in 200 consecutive patients.
Plas Reconstr Surg., 115 (2005), pp. 575-577
[7.]
A. Weiss.
A tumescent twist to breast augmentation.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 110 (2002), pp. 1810
[8.]
W.B. Rosenblatt.
A "splash" twist to a painless breast augmentation.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 112 (2003), pp. 715
[9.]
A.T. Culliford 4th, J.A. Spector, R.L. Flores, L.O. Lovie, M. Choi.
Intraoperative sensorcaine significantly improved postoperative pain management in outpatient reduction mammaplasty.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 120 (2007), pp. 840-844
[10.]
R.C. Mahabir, B.D. Peterson, J.S. Williamson, S.M. Valnicek, D.G. Williamsom.
Locally administered ketorolac and bupivacaine for control of postoperative pain in breast augmentation patients: Part II. 10 day follow-up.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 121 (2008), pp. 638-643
[11.]
R.C. Mahabir, B.D. Peterson, J.S. Williamson, S.M. Valnicek, D.G. Williamsom.
Locally administered ketorolac and bupivacaine for control of postoperative pain in breast augmentation patients.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 114 (2004), pp. 1910-1916
[12.]
N. Ramal, A. Gupta, M. Holding, K. Grell, R. Allvin.
Pain relief following breast augmentation surgery: A comparison between incisional patient controlled regional analgesia and traditional oral analgesia.
Eur J Anaesthesiol., 23 (2006), pp. 1010-1017
[13.]
M. Fayman, A. Beeton, E. Potgieter, P.J. Becker.
Comparative analysis of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for infiltration analgesia for bilateral breast surgery.
Aesthetic Plast Surg., 27 (2003), pp. 100-103
[14.]
L. Lu, N.A. Fine.
The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery.
Reconstruction mammaplasty and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 115 (2005), pp. 1927
[15.]
L. Roumundstald, H. Breivik, H. Roald, K. Skolleborg, P.R. Roumundstald, A. Stubhaug.
Chronic pain and sensory changes after augmentation mammoplasty: Long term effects of preincisional administration of methylprednisolone.
[16.]
S.M. Klein, A. Bergh, S.M. Steele, G.S. Georgiade, R.A. Greengrass.
Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery.
Anesth Analg, 90 (2000), pp. 1402-1405
[17.]
C.S. Lai, W.H. Yip, S.D. Lin, C.K. Chou, C.K. Tseng.
Continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia for breast augmentation.
Ann Plast Surg., 36 (1996), pp. 113-116
[18.]
F.R. Kazmier, S.L. Henry, D. Christiansen, C.L. Puckett.
A prospective, randomized, double blind controlled trial of continuous local anesthetic infusion in cosmetic breast augmentation.
Plast Reconstr Surg., 121 (2008), pp. 711-715
[19.]
L. Roumundstald, H. Breivik, H. Roald, K. Skolleborg, T. Haugen, J. Narum.
Methylprednisolone reduces pain, emesis, and fatigue after breast augmentation surgery: A single dose, randomized, parallel group study with methylprednisolone 125 mg, parecoxib 40 mg and placebo.
Anesth Analg., 102 (2006), pp. 418-425
Copyright © 2008. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
Download PDF
Article options