metricas
covid
Buscar en
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Toda la web
Inicio Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Early appearance of radiolucent lines around total knee arthroplasty in rheumato...
Journal Information
Vol. 68. Issue 3.
Pages 239-246 (May - June 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
930
Vol. 68. Issue 3.
Pages 239-246 (May - June 2024)
Original Paper
Full text access
Early appearance of radiolucent lines around total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients. How does it impact the aseptic failure rate and functional outcomes at 13 years of follow-up?
Aparición temprana de líneas radiolúcidas alrededor de la artroplastia total de rodilla en pacientes con artritis reumatoide. ¿Cuál es su impacto en la tasa de fracaso aséptico y los resultados funcionales a los 13 años de seguimiento?
Visits
930
G. Garabano
Corresponding author
, C.A. Pesciallo, J. Rodriguez, L. Perez Alamino, F. Tillet, H. del Sel, F. Lopreite
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Related content
G. Garabano, C.A. Pesciallo, J. Rodríguez, L. Pérez Alamino, F. Tillet, H. del Sel, F. Lopreite
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Description of overall patients and comparative analysis between cohorts.
Table 2. Comparative analysis between cohorts.
Table 3. Clinical and radiological assessment.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Introduction

Aseptic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure has been associated with radiolucent lines. This study aimed to determine the impact of the early appearance of radiolucent lines (linear images of 1, 2, or >2mm at the cement–bone interface) around the TKA on prosthetic survival and functional outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during a 2–20 years follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of RA patients treated with TKA between 2000 and 2011. We comparatively analyzed patients with and without radiolucent lines around implants. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the knee society score (KSS) collected before surgery, at years 2, 5, and 10, and at the last postoperative follow-up. The knee society roentgenographic evaluation system was used to analyze the impact of radiolucent lines around the implants at 1, 2, 5, and more than ten years of follow-up. The reoperation and prosthetic survival rates were calculated at the end of the follow-up.

Results

The study series included 72 TKAs with a median follow-up of 13.2 years (range: 4.0–21.0), of which 16 (22.2%) had radiolucent lines. We did not observe aseptic failure, and prosthetic survival at the end of the study was 94.4% (n=68). The KSS improved significantly (p<0.001) between preoperative values at 2, 5, and 10 years and the end of follow-up, with no differences between patients with and without radiolucent lines.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the early appearance of radiolucent lines around a TKA in RA patients does not significantly impact prosthetic survival or long-term functional outcomes at 13 years of follow-up.

Keywords:
Knee
Rheumatoid arthritis
Total knee arthroplasty
Radiolucent lines
Functional outcomes
Aseptic failure
Resumen
Introducción

El fracaso aséptico de la artroplastia total de rodilla (ATR) se ha asociado a las líneas radiolúcidas. Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar el impacto en la supervivencia protésica y en los resultados funcionales a largo plazo de la aparición temprana de líneas radiolúcidas (imágenes lineales de 1, 2 o >2mm en la interface cemento-hueso) alrededor de la ATR en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea (AR).

Métodos

Analizamos retrospectivamente una serie consecutiva de pacientes con AR tratados con ATR entre los años 2000 y 2011. Se analizaron comparativamente los pacientes con y sin líneas radiolúcidas alrededor de los implantes. Los resultados clínicos se evaluaron con el Knee Society Score (KSS) registrado antes de la cirugía, a los 2, 5 y 10 años, y en el último seguimiento postoperatorio. Se utilizó el Sistema de Evaluación Roentgenográfica de la Sociedad de la Rodilla para analizar el impacto de las líneas radiolúcidas alrededor de los implantes a 1, 2, 5 y más de 10 años de seguimiento. Se calcularon las tasas de reoperación y supervivencia protésica al final del seguimiento.

Resultados

La serie de estudio incluyó 72 ATR con una mediana de seguimiento de 13,2 años (rango: 4,0-21,0), de las cuales 16 (22,2%) presentaban líneas radiolúcidas. No se observaron fallos asépticos, y la supervivencia protésica al final del estudio fue del 94,4% (n=68). El KSS mejoró significativamente (p<0,001) entre los valores preoperatorios a los 2, 5 y 10 años y el final del seguimiento, sin diferencias entre los pacientes con y sin líneas radiolúcidas.

Conclusiones

Nuestro estudio demuestra que la aparición precoz de líneas radiolúcidas alrededor de una ATR en pacientes con AR no afecta significativamente a la supervivencia protésica ni a los resultados funcionales a largo plazo a los 13 años de seguimiento.

Palabras clave:
Rodilla
Artritis reumatoide
Artroplastia total de rodilla
Líneas radiolúcidas
Resultados funcionales
Fallo aséptico
Full Text
Introduction

Despite the improvements in pharmacological therapies, the number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not decreased in the last years,1,2 being the third leading cause of arthroplasty in the US and Europe.3,4

Survival of TKA over ten years has been reported to vary from 81 to 98%, and aseptic loosening represents one of the leading causes of revision.4,5 Aseptic failure of the TKA has been associated with radiolucent lines and its incidence ranges from 29% to 44% in patients with RA in the short and medium term.6–8 Although the progress of demarcations could harm long-term prosthetic survival,9,10 little is known about its real impact on revision rates regarding the onset time after TKA in RA patients. Furthermore, although these demarcations are a common phenomenon around knee arthroplasty,6–8,10 little is known about whether they impact functional outcomes in RA patients.

We hypothesized that the early appearance of radiolucent lines would negatively impact prosthetic survival beyond ten years of follow-up. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of radiolucent lines around the TKA on prosthetic survival in RA patients during a 2–20-year follow-up and secondarily to see if the appearance of these demarcations affects functional scores.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed our department's database, where we systematically recorded all surgeries and follow-up information. The patients’ selection criteria were RA diagnosis and primary TKA.

After the approval of the institutional ethics committee (Protocol Number 1409), information from our database was crossed with medical and radiographic records at our hospital to obtain accurate data to form the final cohort. The study cut-off date was December 2020.

We included RA patients consecutively treated with TKA from January 2000 to December 2011. History of previous surgeries on the operated knee and those who did not meet the minimum follow-up of 24 months were excluded. Also, due to their different biomechanical and radiological behavior, arthroplasties with a prosthesis with a higher degree of a constraint than a posterior stabilized (PS) one was used were excluded.

In all cases, RA was diagnosed or confirmed by our institution's Rheumatology Department, according to the American College of Rheumatology (score6 assessing joint involvement, serology, acute phase reactants, and duration of symptoms).11

Of 81 TKA identified, nine were excluded (2 for having CCK prosthesis, 1 for having a history of surgery in the operated knee, 3 for not having the radiographic studies to analyze, and 2 for not complying with the minimum follow-up). The study series included 72 TKAs performed on 58 patients, 53 (94.8%) female. The median patient age at surgery was 57.5 (IQR 50–66.5) years, with a mean DAS-28 of 3.7±0.9. Regarding the pharmacological treatment of RA, 65.3% had received corticosteroids, 30.5% methotrexate, and 4.2% biological therapy. The overall time between RA diagnosis and arthroplasty was 12 (range 5–30) years. According to the medical records, 45 (62.5%) PFC Sigma, Johnson & Johnson, Depuy (War, Ind, USA), and 27 (37.5%) Scorpio Stryker (Ma, NJ, USA) were used. All prostheses were posterior stabilized. The summary description of the series is detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Description of overall patients and comparative analysis between cohorts.

  Overall (n=72) 
Female (n, %)  53 (73.6) 
Age (median, IQR)  67.5 (50.0–76.5) 
ASA (n, %)
II  26 (36.1) 
III  33 (45.8) 
IV  13 (18.1) 
BMI (median, IQR)  31.0 (26.0–35.5) 
Time between RA diagnosis and TKA years – median IQR  12 (5–30) 
DAS-28 (mean, SD)  3.7±0.9 
High DAS-28  17 (23.6) 
Pharmacological therapy (n, %)
Steroids  47 (65.3) 
Methotrexate  22 (30.5) 
Biological  3 (4.2) 
Pre-operative KSS (mean, SD)  44.2±7.1 
Another arthroplasty  27 (37.5) 
Follow-up (median, IQR)  13.2 (4.0–21.0) 

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body-mass index; DAS: disease activity score; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation; KSS: knee society score.

The study population was divided into two cohorts for analysis, those with RLL and those without RLL, to assess the impact of the RLL on functional outcomes and prosthesis survival.

Surgical technique

The same surgical team performed all surgeries under hypotensive spinal anesthesia in a laminar-flow operating room. We use a midline, longitudinal skin incision with a medial parapatellar approach and capsule-synovectomy. Soft tissue balancing was based on preoperative deformity. In all cases, we replaced the patella with an all-polyethylene kneecap. All prosthetic components were cemented in a single-stage approach (femoral component followed by tibial component, including the tibial keel) using antibiotic cement (gentamicin 0.5g per cement dose). Routinely administered antibiotic prophylaxis (cephazolin during 24h) and antithrombotic drugs (low-molecular-weight heparin for three weeks). Postoperative clinical exams were scheduled at 3 and 6 weeks, six months, and yearly after that.

Data collection

We recorded demographic data (gender and age), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), body mass index (BMI), the time between RA diagnosis and TKA, pharmacological treatment (corticosteroids, methotrexate, biologics), RA activity level at the time of TKA (assessed with the disease activity score-28 – DAS-28),12 and prosthesis used.

Clinical analysis

The knee society score (KSS)13 was used to assess objective clinical outcomes preoperatively, at 2, 5, and 10 years, and the last patient's follow-up visit.

Radiographic analysis

The femorotibial angle was digitally measured before surgery, and during the immediate postoperative period, an anteroposterior (AP) radiographic view was assessed with Synapse software (Fujifilm Corporation, USA).

Radiolucent lines in the bone cement interface (linear images 1, 2mm, or >2mm thick), osteolysis (nonlinear areas of bone destruction thicker than 2mm) around the prosthesis, and migration of the implant (>2mm) were assessed by analyzing the postoperative AP and lateral views performed at 1, 2, 5, 10 years and the end of follow-up.14 The affected zone, time of appearance, and progression over time were recorded. The knee society roentgenographic evaluation system was used to describe demarcation lines around the tibial and femoral components and determine mechanical loosening.15,16 Two independent observers and differences performed a radiographic assessment were settled by consensus.

We also recorded the date, type, and number of postoperative complications that required reoperations and prosthetic survival until the end of follow-up. Prosthesis survival was measured, considering revision for any reason as the endpoint.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were expressed as mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables as frequencies or percentages. A “t” test and a Chi-square test were used to compare quantitative variables and proportions among groups. A probability of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 23.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Of the 72 TKAs analyzed, we observed radiolucent lines around 16 (22.2%) components. The comparative analysis of both groups is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Comparative analysis between cohorts.

  RLL (n=16)  Without RLL (n=56)  p value 
Female (n, %)  15 (93.7)  42 (90.5)  0.10 
Age (median, IQR)  64.0 (56.5–73.0)  66.0 (59.0–76.5)  0.28 
ASA (n, %)
II  3 (18.7)  23 (41.0)  0.15 
III  8 (50.0)  25 (44.7)   
IV  5 (31.3)  8 (14.3)   
BMI (median, IQR)  32.0 (28.5–34.5)  30.6 (27.5–33.0)  0.10 
Time between RA diagnosis and TKA years – median IQR  11.8 (5–25)  13.0 (4.5–30)  0.23 
DAS-28 (mean, SD)  3.3±0.6  3.8±0.5  0.27 
High DAS-28  5 (31.2)  12 (21.4)  0.41 
Pharmacological therapy (n, %)
Steroids  11 (68.7)  36 (64.3)  0.74 
Methotrexate  4 (25.0)  18 (32.1)  0.58 
Biological  1 (6.3)  2 (3.6)  0.63 
Pre-operative KSS (mean, SD)  42.5±6.8  44.0±5.3  0.10 
Another arthroplasty  6 (37.5)  21 (37.5)  0.99 
Follow-up (median, IQR)  12.0 (5.0–19.5)  13.5 (4.0–20.0)  0.77 

RLL: radiolucent lines; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body-mass index; DAS: disease activity score; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation; KSS: knee society score.

Clinical outcomes

KSS values improved significantly between baseline and the first two postoperative years. These improvements were sustained over time with no significant differences at 2-, 5-, 10- and more than 10-year postoperative scores (p=0.28), and no significant differences were observed between patients with and without RLL (Figs. 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Overall KSS score without significant differences during follow-up.

(0.07MB).
Figure 2.

Comparison between patients with and without radiolucent lines during follow-up.

(0.13MB).
Radiological outcomes

The radiological assessment showed preoperative valgus malalignment in 91.66% (n=66) and varus in 8.4% (n=6) cases. The postoperative alignment was valgus in 60 (83.33%) cases and varus in 12 (16.67%) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Clinical and radiological assessment.

  Overall  RLL (n=16)  Without RLL (n=56)  p value 
Functional outcomes(mean, SD)
84.9±5.4  84.7±5.9  85.0±4.1  0.57 
84.1±4.5  83.9±4.7  84.0±4.6  0.68 
10  83.8±3.9  83.0±4.4  83.5±4.1  0.28 
>10 years  83.2±3.8  82.6±3.6  83.2±4.0  0.44 
Radiological outcomesPostoperative alignment (mean, SD)
Valgus  4.7±1.8  4.2±0.9  3.9±0.8  0.28 
Varus  0.3±0.6  0.5±0.8  0.7±0.6  0.54 
Aseptic loosening (n, %)  0 (0)  0 (0)  0 (0)  – 

RLL: radiolucent lines; SD: standard deviation.

We found 27 radiolucent lines around 16 (22.22%) prosthetic components in 16 patients. All appeared during the first two postoperative years around of tibial component (Fig. 3). Ten patients presented one demarcated zone, 3 two zones, 2 three zones, and 1 four zones. All of them were <2mm and did not progress during follow-up. The frequency of RLL distribution is detailed in Fig. 4. No femoral component showed demarcation. No patients showed signs of osteolysis, migration of prosthetic components, or more than four areas with RLL.

Figure 3.

(A) Preoperative AP radiograph. (B) 1 year of follow-up with RLL zone 1 of the tibia. (C) 14 years of follow-up, without progression of the RLL. (D) Lateral view with no RLL at 14 years of follow-up.

(0.24MB).
Figure 4.

Frequency and distribution of the RLL in the series. M: medial; L: lateral; A: anterior; P: posterior.

(0.08MB).
Reoperation rate and prosthesis survival

The reoperation rate was 6.94% (n=5). All reoperations were performed within two years of the procedure (median 12 months; range 5–20). Four were due to prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and were successfully treated with a 2-stage revision. The remaining patient suffered an extensor apparatus rupture, as he fell from his height seven months after TKA and was successfully treated with a direct repair procedure. No mechanical failures were registered until the end of the study. Prosthetic survival at the end of the study was 94.4% (n=68).

Discussion

The most relevant finding of our study was that the early appearance (in the first two postoperative years) of radiolucent lines around the TKA implants did not impact long-term prosthetic survival in RA patients.

Radiolucent lines on follow-up radiographs are a common finding in TKA analysis, and their appearance has been associated with mechanical loosening and prosthetic failure in non-RA patients.6,10,17 Most previous studies describing these radiolucent lines do so at the end of follow-up.18,19 Although using cementless prostheses and diagnoses other than RA, a few have evaluated the evolution of these lines at more a than ten years of follow-up.6–9 To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate this topic in RA patients. In the present study, 22.22% of the prosthetics components presented these RLL during the first two postoperative years. After a median follow-up of 13.5 years, we did not observe progression or impact on prosthetic survival. These RLL were located around the tibial component, which has been described as the most frequent location even in non-RA patients.6,10,20,21 Another interesting point of our analysis is that, although the inflammatory component of RA can be aggressive (25% of the patients analyzed had high levels of disease activity at the time of TKA), the RLL showed no progression between two and more than ten years of follow-up. It is in contrast to that reported by Bohler et al.22 who observed that patients with higher disease activity levels at the time of surgery had a higher risk of aseptic failure in the future.

The absence of revisions for mechanical loosening in our series contrasts with those studied by Lee et al.5 who reported a revision rate of 12.87% at 15 years of follow-up. However, our findings are consistent with Yamanaka et al.’s,8 who found no revisions due to mechanical loosening at 12 years of follow-up. The absence of revisions due to mechanical loosening in our patients could be explained by the involvement of other joints (37.5% of the patients underwent another arthroplasty), generating a lower demand for the implant.2 It also could be explained because our study population was relatively young (median age 67.5 years) and mostly females (94.8%), which agrees with that reported by Rand et al.,23 who highlighted these variables as protective of long-term revision. Finally, another possible explanation could be related to the cemented fixation used in the series, which, even in this particular group of patients, is shown to be an alternative that allows efficient long-term fixation. Furthermore, prosthesis survival in our series was consistent with the ones reported by Kristensen et al.20 (81% after ten years), Rodriguez et al.24 (91% after 15 years), and Lee et al.5 (98.7% after ten years).

Another relevant finding of our study was that the improvements in functional outcomes achieved two years after TKA in RA patients did not deteriorate over time or with the appearance of RLL. We observed no significant changes when we analyzed functional outcomes at 5, 10, or even above ten years of follow-up. In addition, we also observed no significant differences in the short or long term when comparing these scores with those of patients without RLL. Because we found no studies correlating functional outcomes with the occurrence of RLL in RA patients, we can only compare this with TKA in non-RA patients. Our results were comparable to those reported by Ng et al.25 who reported the apparition of radiolucent lines in 48% of their series and found that it did not affect early functional outcomes. In contrast, they were opposite to those reported recently by Sadoghi et al.,26 who reported a direct relationship between RLL and pain. Their series reported that 28 patients reported postoperative pain, of which 27 had RLL.

Few studies have focused on characterizing functional outcomes’ evolution in RA patients.27 While different series have reported improvements in functional scores and quality of life in RA patients after TKA, most only describe outcomes at the end of follow-up.5,7,8,20 Thus, this analysis fills a gap in the available literature on TKA in RA patients.

The limitations of this study lie in its retrospective design and the small number of patients. It may have affected the statistical significance of the analysis (beta-type error). Another limitation may be represented by the low number of patients treated with biological agents, which is very frequent nowadays. However, we understand this limitation as logical due to the postoperative follow-up that the series presented. Another limitation was the absence of similar studies, which would allow us to compare our findings accurately. Its strength is that it is the first to compare RA patients with and without RLL around a knee prosthesis regarding their functional impact and prosthetic survival at 13 years of follow-up.

Conclusions

The results of our study suggest that the early appearance of radiolucent lines around a TKA in RA patients does not necessarily impact long-term prosthetic survival and functional outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level of evidence iv.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the study's conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by German Garabano, Joaquín Rodriguez, and Leonel Perez Alamino. The first draft of the manuscript was written by German Garabano and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in this study, which involved the use of data from human participants, were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. The Ethics committee of the British Hospital of Buenos Aires approved this study (N° 1409).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Availability of data and material

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding

This research has not received specific support from public sector agencies, the commercial sector, or non-profit organizations.

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgment

None.

References
[1]
J.S. Smolen, D. Aletaha, I.B. Mcinnes.
Rheumatoid arthritis.
Lancet, 388 (2016), pp. 2023-2038
[2]
T. Pincus, T. Sokka, H. Kautiainen.
Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985.
Arthritis Rheum, 52 (2005), pp. 1009-1019
[3]
K. Hekmat, L. Jacobsson, J.-Å. Nilsson, I.F. Petersson, O. Robertsson, G. Garellick, et al.
Decrease in the incidence of total hip arthroplasties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis – results from a well-defined population in south Sweden.
Arthritis Res Ther, 13 (2011), pp. R67
[4]
C. Mertelsmann-Voss, S. Lyman, T.J. Pan, S.M. Goodman, M.P. Figgie, L.A. Mandl.
US trends in rates of arthroplasty for inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and spondyloarthritis.
Arthritis Rheumatol, 66 (2014), pp. 1432-1439
[5]
J.K. Lee, Y.M. Kee, H.K. Chung, C.H. Choi.
Long-term results of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a minimum 15-year review.
Can J Surg, 58 (2015), pp. 193-197
[6]
N. Aebli, J. Krebs, D. Schwenke, T. Hii, U. Wehrli.
Progression of radiolucent lines in cementless twin-bearing low-contact stress knee prostheses.
J Arthrop, 19 (2004), pp. 783-789
[7]
D.F. Dalury, F.C. Ewald, M.J. Christie, R.D. Scott.
Total knee arthroplasty in a group of patients less than 45 years of age.
J Arthroplasty, 10 (1995), pp. 598-602
[8]
H. Yamanaka, K. Goto, M. Suzuki.
Clinical result of Hi-tech knee II total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 5–12-year follow-up.
J Orthop Surg Res, 7 (2012), pp. 9
[9]
M.A. Freeman.
Radiolucent lines: a question of nomenclature.
J Arthroplasty, 14 (1999), pp. 1-2
[10]
S. Smith, V.S. Naima, M.A. Freeman.
The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 14 (1999), pp. 3-8
[11]
D. Aletha, T. Neogi, A.J. Silman, J. Funovits, D.T. Felson, C.O. Bingham 3rd, et al.
2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European league against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.
Arthritis Rheum, 62 (2010), pp. 2569-2581
[12]
D.M. van Der Heijde, M. van Hof, P.L. van Riel, L.B. van de Putte.
Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologist.
J Rheumatol, 20 (1993), pp. 579-581
[13]
J.N. Insall, L.D. Dorr, R.D. Scott, W.N. Scott.
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 284 (1989), pp. 13-14
[14]
A. Kobayashi, W.J. Donnelly, G. Scott, M.A. Freeman.
Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 79 (1997), pp. 583-589
[15]
F.C. Ewald.
The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 248 (1989), pp. 9-12
[16]
E.L. Kaplan, P. Meier.
Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
Springer Series in Statistics, (1992), pp. 319-337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25
[17]
C.M. Bach, I.E. Streingruber, S. Peer, M. Nogler, C. Wimmer, M. Ogon.
Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop, 385 (2001), pp. 144-150
[18]
K. Kumagai, K. Harigane, Y. Kusayama, T. Tezuka, Y. Inaba, T. Saito.
Total knee arthroplasty improves both knee function and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Mod Rheumatol, 27 (2017), pp. 806-810
[19]
T. Fujiwara, K. Fujiwara, S. Hamai, S. Kamura, Y. Nakashima, H. Miyahara.
Mild-term clinical outcomes of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Mod Rheumatol, 29 (2019), pp. 596-601
[20]
O. Kristensen, A. Nafei, P. Kjaersgaard-Andersen, I. Hvid, J. Jensen.
Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 74 (1992), pp. 803-806
[21]
H.C. Thomason III, R.R.J.R. Slater, G.S. Tooma, M.R. Rosu, S.S. Kelley.
The value of serial postoperative radiographs of total knee arthroplasties.
J South Orthop Assoc, 7 (1998), pp. 2735
[22]
C. Bohler, P. Weimann, F. Alasti, J.S. Smolen, R. Windhager, D. Aletaha.
Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and the risk of aseptic arthroplasty loosening.
Semin Arthritis Rheum, 50 (2020), pp. 245-251
[23]
J.A. Rand, R.T. Trousdale, D.M. Ilstrup, W.S. Harmsen.
Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85 (2003), pp. 259-265
[24]
J.A. Rodriguez, S. Saddler, S. Edelman, C.S. Ranawat.
Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in class 3 and 4 rheumatoid arthritis.
J Arthroplasty, 11 (1996), pp. 141-145
[25]
H.J.H. Ng, G.K.Y. Tan, R.G. Tan, C.Y. Kau.
Incidence of radiolucent lines after cemented total knee arthroplasty.
Arch Bone Jt Surg, 10 (2022), pp. 85-91
[26]
P. Sadoghi, A. Leithner, P. Weber, J. Friesenbichler, G. Gruber, N. Kastner, et al.
Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case–control study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 12 (2011), pp. 142
[27]
S.M. Goodman, B. Johnson, M. Zhang, W.T. Huang, R. Zhu, M. Figgie, et al.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have similar excellent outcomes after total knee replacement compared with patients with osteoarthritis.
J Rheumatol, 43 (2016), pp. 46-53
Copyright © 2024. SECOT
Download PDF
Article options
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos