was read the article
array:22 [ "pii" => "S0214460321000504" "issn" => "02144603" "doi" => "10.1016/j.rlfa.2021.02.002" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-10-01" "aid" => "263" "copyrightAnyo" => "2021" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Logop Fon Audiol. 2021;41:164-71" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "itemSiguiente" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S0214460321000516" "issn" => "02144603" "doi" => "10.1016/j.rlfa.2021.05.008" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-10-01" "aid" => "264" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. y Asociación Española de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología e Iberoamericana de Fonoaudiología" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Rev Logop Fon Audiol. 2021;41:172-82" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "The accuracy of a Spanish dynamic assessment of narrative language in identifying developmental language disorder: A cross validation study" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "172" "paginaFinal" => "182" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "La precisión de una evaluación dinámica del lenguaje narrativo en español para identificar el trastorno del desarrollo del lenguaje: un estudio de validación cruzada" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Mariah Forbush Romero, Douglas B. Petersen, Allison Long, Maria Nelly Arvizu, Christiane Dechert" "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mariah" "apellidos" => "Forbush Romero" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Douglas B." "apellidos" => "Petersen" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Allison" "apellidos" => "Long" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Maria Nelly" "apellidos" => "Arvizu" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Christiane" "apellidos" => "Dechert" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0214460321000516?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/02144603/0000004100000004/v1_202110260716/S0214460321000516/v1_202110260716/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S0214460321000772" "issn" => "02144603" "doi" => "10.1016/j.rlfa.2021.09.001" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2021-10-01" "aid" => "266" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. y Asociación Española de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología e Iberoamericana de Fonoaudiología" "documento" => "simple-article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "edi" "cita" => "Rev Logop Fon Audiol. 2021;41:161-3" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:10 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Editorial</span>" "titulo" => "Estrategias actuales para la evaluación del lenguaje infantil en el mundo hispanohablante" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "161" "paginaFinal" => "163" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Current strategies for child language assessment in the Spanish-speaking world" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Ana T. Pérez-Leroux" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ana T." "apellidos" => "Pérez-Leroux" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0214460321000772?idApp=UINPBA00004N" "url" => "/02144603/0000004100000004/v1_202110260716/S0214460321000772/v1_202110260716/es/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original article</span>" "titulo" => "Elicited vs. spontaneous language as methods for the assessment of grammatical development: The DEME assessment tool" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "164" "paginaFinal" => "171" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Anny Castilla-Earls, Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux, Alejandra Auza" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Anny" "apellidos" => "Castilla-Earls" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "annycastilla@uh.edu" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Ana Teresa" "apellidos" => "Pérez-Leroux" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Alejandra" "apellidos" => "Auza" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 4455 Cullen Blvd, Room 100, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, United States" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Department of Linguistics and Spanish, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Lenguaje elicitatdo vs. lenguaje espontáneo como métodos de evaluación del desarollo gramatical: la prueba de evaluación DEME" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1229 "Ancho" => 1675 "Tamanyo" => 78179 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Correlation between broad measures of grammaticality, Percentage of Grammatical Utterances, and Total DEME score, by group.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Children with Developmental Language Disorders (DLD), also known as Specific Language Impairment, have difficulties learning language in comparison to their same-age peers (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015">Bishop et al., 2016; Leonard, 2019</a>). Although difficulties in the areas of phonology, semantics, and pragmatics are all part of the disorder, the main characteristic is that children with DLD make significantly more grammatical errors than their peers without DLD. Therefore, measures of grammaticality are often included in language assessment practices for the identification of DLD. Our goal is to compare elicited language and spontaneous language approaches to collecting language samples.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Analysis of spontaneous language, which allows a naturalistic observation of the representative language skills of a child, is one of the standard strategies for the assessment of child language (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0045">Gutiérrez-Clellen et al., 2000; Restrepo, 1998; Rojas & Iglesias, 2013</a>). Narrative samples are deemed particularly useful, as they can be used for the assessment of narrative and grammatical skills, and because they elicit more complex and grammatically diverse language compared to interviews or conversation (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100">Reuterskiöld Wagner et al., 2000</a>). Story-retelling tasks yield greater productivity in terms of sentence complexity, length, and completeness than other forms of sampling (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040">Gazella & Stockman, 2003</a>), a possible effect of the absence of a shared common ground (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065">Masterson & Kamhi, 1992</a>). Measures of language productivity such as mean length of utterance (MLU), subordination index (number of dependent clauses per sentence) and percentage of grammatical errors (PGU; <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090">Restrepo, 1998</a>) or number of errors per utterance (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib3345">Simon-Cereijido & Gutiérrez-Clellen, 2007</a>) can be derived from narratives (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030">Castilla-Earls & Eriks-Brophy, 2012; Restrepo et al., 2010</a>). These measures are often used to examine language growth in children (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030">Castilla-Earls & Eriks-Brophy, 2012; Rojas & Iglesias, 2013</a>) and/or to identify children with DLD (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0090">Restrepo, 1998; Simon-Cereijido & Gutiérrez-Clellen, 2007</a>).</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The second main approach to assess the language of Spanish-speaking children relies on elicited language (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010">Bedore & Leonard, 2001; Castilla-Earls & Eriks-Brophy, 2012; Morgan et al., 2013</a>). Used as an assessment strategy, this approach focuses on creating felicitous (and/or obligatory) contexts for the production of constructions where errors are predictable. Most language assessment batteries include elicited language to control for the number of opportunities a child has to produce a given response, as some structures might be avoided or not used in a narrative (e.g., the subjunctive mood or clitic pronouns). In this study, we employ the <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Desarrollo Morfologico del Español</span> (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0115">Castilla, 2008; Castilla-Earls et al., 2020</a>), which is a task developed to elicit grammatical forms in Spanish, to investigate elicited language.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is important to note that accuracy rates in elicited and spontaneous language seldom align in language development. Naturalistic language samples show far lower rates of ungrammatical productions relative to elicited samples (see <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Castilla-Earls et al., 2020</a> for a review). Errors that appear reliably under experimental paradigms might be vanishingly rare in spontaneous speech. At times these asymmetries have methodological sources. From one perspective, spontaneous speech might hide errors that are difficult to detect, or fail to elicit more difficult structures. For example, coding for missing direct objects – a clinically useful property – is notoriously unreliable in spontaneous language (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080">Pirvulescu, 2006</a>). From another, more general perspective, children's spontaneous production seems more grammatically conservative (i.e., faithful to the ambient language), showing few commission (as opposed to omission) errors. According to <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160">Snyder (2007)</a>, under the demands of elicitation tasks children might venture beyond their established abilities; thus, in some instances, erroneous performance may be interpreted as task effects. Beyond issues of the theoretical interpretation of errors, these discrepancies raise questions about the congruence of the two approaches to sampling language. From an assessment perspective, what matters is whether one form of measurement offers better differentiation between typical and atypical populations.</p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There is an additional dimension to consider. While some approaches focus on broad measures of grammaticality, such as the percentage of grammatical utterances in a sample (Simon-Cereijido & Gutierrez-Clellen, 2007) or the number of grammatical errors per utterance in a sample (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090">Restrepo, 1998</a>),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> other approaches focus on more narrow measures, scrutinizing a single property or set of properties (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130">Gusewski & Rojas, 2017</a>). Our goal is to explore these potential differences (spontaneous vs. elicited, and broad vs. narrow) in language assessment. Article production, a narrow measure of grammaticality, provides a perfect scenario to test the difference in elicitation approaches because articles are frequent and unavoidable in spontaneous language. Articles are also well-established clinical markers of DLD in Spanish (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0110">Anderson & Souto, 2005; Restrepo & Gutierrez-Clellen, 2001</a>). For example, monolingual Spanish-speaking 5–6-year-olds in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070">Morgan et al. (2013)</a> have substantive differences in article accuracy according to clinical status (81% TD, 54% DLD). Developmentally, article acquisition has different timelines depending on whether the data is elicited or spontaneous. For monolingual children, articles emerge before the second birthday, when nominal phrases emerge, but production is not initially accurate. In spontaneous speech, articles first appear as an undifferentiated vowel (proto-article) segment that precedes the noun phrase, which eventually morphs into a full article paradigm and morphological accuracy (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135">Lopez-Ornat, 1997</a>). By the second birthday, omission rates drop sharply (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0145">Pérez-Leroux & Battersby, 2009; Serra et al., 2000</a>) and gender accuracy in articles is at ceiling. For instance, Snyder et al. (2005) find 97% accuracy on data extracted from the CHILDES database. In elicited language studies, article errors persist until school age on article choice (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115">Castilla, 2008</a>), in number marking (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140">Miller & Schmitt, 2010</a>), and article omission (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115">Castilla, 2008</a>). For monolingual children, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075">Pérez-Leroux et al., 2012</a> report target production of articles developing from 50% to 75% between the ages of three and five. By the age of six, both bilingual and monolingual children produce minimal article errors in elicited tasks, mostly of omission. Relevant to our purpose, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Castilla-Earls et al., 2020</a> comparison of effects sizes for article use in children with and without DLD showed that the effect size of the difference for articles was greater for elicited production than for spontaneous language.</p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The present study compares a group of children at risk for DLD and a group of children with typical development. We investigate whether data from monolingual Spanish-speaking children reveal differences between the two approaches (elicited versus spontaneous), when using broad (overall grammatical accuracy) and narrow measures (article accuracy)? Is the distribution of errors observed comparable for children with typical language skills and those at risk of language disorders?</p><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Methods</span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Participants</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The participants in this study included monolingual Spanish-speaking children with typical language skills (TL; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>26) and at risk of developmental language disorders (Risk; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>29). There were 32 boys (Risk<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>19, TL<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>13) and 23 girls (Risk<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10, TL<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>13). The average age for all children was 66 months (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10 months) with no statistically significant differences between the TL and Risk groups (Age TL<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>66 months, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10 months; Age Risk<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>66 months, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">SD</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10 months). All children passed an otoacoustic emission test and obtained a score of ≥70 on the Non-Verbal Scale of the KBIT-2 (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055">Kaufman & Kaufman, 2014</a>). Children were considered to be at risk of developmental language disorder if they failed the Tamiz de Problemas del Lenguaje (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005">Auza et al., 2018</a>) using the cut-off scores by age groups provided in the testing manual. The TPL has acceptable diagnostic accuracy with at least 80% sensitivity and specificity for the age groups included in this study (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0005">Auza et al., 2018; Plante & Vance, 1994</a>).</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Measures</span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Spontaneous language samples</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Three measures were derived from spontaneous language samples: mean length of utterance in words (MLUw), Percentage of Grammatical Utterances (PGU), which is a broad measure of grammaticality, and Percentage of Correct Articles, which is the narrow measure of grammaticality used in this study. To calculate MLUw, all samples were segmented into communication units following the protocol from the Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT). PGU was calculated as the number of utterances with a grammatical error over all utterances in the analysis (e.g., errors of omission, errors with any grammatical structures, over regularization, etc.). To calculate the percentage of correct articles in the narrative, all instances with an article in the language samples were coded as either correct or incorrect (e.g., omission of articles, gender substitution, number substitutions). The percentage of correct articles in the narrative was calculated as the number of correct uses of articles in the sample over all uses (correct and incorrect) of articles. Article errors were classified either as omission or as substitution errors.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Desarrollo Morfológico de Español (DEME)</span><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The DEME was initially developed to test the production of articles, clitics, adjectives, and plurals in Spanish speaking children (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115">Castilla, 2008</a>). This task was used to examine language development in Spanish-speaking children ages 3 to 5 in Colombia. Using the DEME, Castilla (2008) showed developmental changes in the production of clitics, articles, adjectives and plurals between the ages of 3 and 4, but no statistically significant changes between 4 and 5, although these children were not performing as adults yet. With funding from the National Institutes of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the DEME was expanded to include the evaluation of verbs and the subjunctive mood. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Castilla-Earls et al. (2020)</a> examined the diagnostic accuracy of the DEME to identify children in Mexico with Developmental Language Disorders. They found statistically significant differences between children with and without developmental language disorders for the production of articles, adjectives, clitics, verbs, and the subjunctive, but not for plurals. In addition, they found that a combination of verbs and clitics provided the best diagnostic potential between the two groups.</p><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The DEME is a task designed to elicit specific grammatical structures known to be problematic for children with DLD: articles, direct object pronouns, adjectives, verbs, and the subjunctive mood. The test consists of 50 test items that provide a raw score between 0 and 50 that represent the number of correct items. The test consists of pictures accompanied by either a question or a sentence completion activity to elicit the grammatical structure of interest. There are 10 items for direct object pronouns, 10 items for articles, 10 items for adjectives, 10 items for verbs, 5 items for the subjunctive, and 5 items for plurals. It takes approximately 12<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min to administer the task to a child. For the purpose of this study, we report raw scores for the DEME Total and the Article items only. We also presented information on substitution and omission errors of articles from the DEME.</p></span></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Procedures</span><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All children were tested individually. Children participated in two testing sessions of about 45<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>min each that included a variety of language measures. In the second session, children completed both the DEME and the language sample task. Children produced two stories: a story retell and a story generation. The story retell was always administered first. For the story retell, children heard a story script while looking at the pictures of one of two books (Frog Goes to Dinner or Frog on His Own). The story script used for the story retelling task can be found on the SALT website. Script selection was done randomly. After children listened to the story while looking at the pictures, children were asked to retell the story. After the story retell task was completed, children were given the second frog storybook and asked to tell a story while looking at the pictures. In this study, we use the combination of the two stories.</p><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All stories were transcribed and segmented using SALT protocols by research assistants. The samples were coded for errors by native Spanish-speaking research assistants. The first author in this study reviewed all coding and disagreements were discussed and solved between the research assistant and the first author of the study. For the scoring of the DEME, a 96% coding inter-rater reliability was established using 20% of the sample.</p></span></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Results</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We first examine differences between TL children and children at risk of DLD in both spontaneous and elicited measures, using <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span> tests. Descriptive statistics and the results of the group comparisons are included in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>. Regarding spontaneous language measures, there were no statistically significant differences between the number of utterances produced by children in the TL group and Risk group, but children in the TL group produced utterances that were longer on average than the children in the Risk group. Children in TL group also produced more articles on average and a higher proportion of these articles were correct in comparison with children in the Risk Group. For elicited language measures, we observed that TL children outperformed children in the Risk group in both the total score of the DEME and the percentage of correct DEME articles.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">We then examined the correlation between spontaneous and elicited measures. The correlation between the total score of the DEME and PGU was highly significant (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.673, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001) as it was the correlation between the correct percentage of DEME articles and the correct percentage of articles in the spontaneous sample (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">r</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.501, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span><<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001). These correlations suggest a linear relationship between the spontaneous and elicited variables with moderate effect sizes. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#fig0005">Figs. 1 and 2</a> show the details of this relationship.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Next, we compared the number of children who made errors in the language samples versus those who made errors in spontaneous language for our narrow and broad measures. We started first with an individual analysis of broad errors. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a> shows the distribution of children by group and by type of language elicitation. None of the children in this study produced 100% accurate responses in either the spontaneous language sample or the DEME. We used a cut-off of 80% to divide children into high accuracy and low accuracy inspired by the 80% cut-off proposed by <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090">Restrepo (1998)</a> for identification of language disorders. Using this approach, we find substantive overall agreement in total, with 40 children who had results of the elicited and language sample which were in agreement: (i) 11 children from the TL group were high performers in both tasks, and two in the Risk group; and (ii) 23 children in the Risk group were low performers in both spontaneous and elicited tasks compared to 5 in the TL group. For a quarter of the children (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>14), the results of the two approaches were in disagreement. Importantly, there were fewer children in the Risk group (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5) with disagreeing results (e.g. high performance in one task but low performance in the other task) than in the TL group (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>10).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Moving on now to the narrow measures, we found 11 children in the TL group who made no errors of articles in either the language sample or the DEME; none of the at-risk group fell in this category. The distribution of children who made errors in articles is presented in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0015">Table 3</a>. A child was considered to have high performance in articles if they were at least 90% accurate. Seven children had low performance in both spontaneous language and the DEME and eight children had high performance in the Risk group. Similarly, 19 children in the TL group showed high performance in both tasks, indicating an accord between their results. In total, the results of the DEME and the spontaneous language were in agreement for 62% of the children. Disagreeing results were found for seven children in the TL group and 14 children in the Risk group. For these children, the performance in the DEME was low while the performance in the sample was high, which amounts to 38% of the sample with disagreement in their results. To further explore the type of errors made by children, we compared the percentage of omission and substitution errors in both types of elicitation techniques. Using a Two-Way Repeated measure ANOVA design, we explored the effect or error (omission or substitution) and sampling context (spontaneous or elicited) with Group (TL or Risk) as a between-subject variable. Descriptive statistics are presented in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0020">Table 4</a>. Our results revealed a significant main effect for sampling (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">F</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8.671, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.005), a significant effect for group (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">F</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>12.035, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.001), but a non-significant effect of error type (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">F</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>.543, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>465). None of the interactions were statistically significant. These results fit in with standard predictions: the DEME elicited a higher percentage of errors than the spontaneous sample and children at Risk made significantly more errors than children in the TL group in both elicited and spontaneous sampling techniques.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0015"></elsevierMultimedia><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0020"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Discussion</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The purpose of this study was to examine the language data collected using two main approaches commonly used in child language assessment: Spontaneous and elicited language tasks. We used both broad and narrow measures of grammaticality to explore how children with typical language skills and children at risk of language disorders perform on spontaneous and elicited measures.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our results suggested that children with typical language skills outperformed children at Risk in both broad and narrow spontaneous and elicited measures. The language sample collected included a comparable number of utterances between the groups, but children in the Risk group produced utterances that were shorter on average and produced fewer articles spontaneously in general. Children produced lower accuracy rates in elicited language in comparison to spontaneous language for both broad and narrow measures. The largest effect size for group differences was found for the DEME total score and PGU, which are both broad measures of grammaticality. These results are in agreement with those of (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120">Castilla-Earls et al., 2015</a>, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Castilla-Earls et al., 2020</a>, <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125">Castilla-Earls et al., 2021</a>), <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090">Restrepo (1998)</a>, Simon-Cereijido and Gutierrez-Clellen (2007), who have documented significant differences between typically developing children and children with DLD for both spontaneous and elicited measures. The results are also in alignment with <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025">Castilla-Earls et al. (2020)</a> who reported higher effect sizes for elicited measures for articles in their review of the literature. These findings are novel because, to our knowledge, it is the first time that the group difference between TL children and children at risk are simultaneously reported for spontaneous and elicited measures.</p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our results also showed moderate correlations between elicited and spontaneous measures for all children in the study. This finding suggests that although elicited and spontaneous measures are positively associated (i.e., they go in the same direction), this association is moderate at best. The association between spontaneous and elicited measures was stronger for broad measures of grammaticality (see <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>) than for narrow measures of grammaticality (see <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>). This difference might be explained by ceiling effects for articles, while broad measures allowed for more variability in performance. This highlights the relevance of using broad measures that target a variety of grammatical structures, such as the DEME. It is also important to note there is variability of the grammatical errors in children with DLD, so broad measures are better to identify children with DLD and to select grammatical structures for remediation (Morgan et al., 2009).</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Regarding the distribution of children who made errors, we found that both broad and narrow measures were more likely to yield concord than discord between the two sampling approaches. We also found differences in broad and narrow measures. Disagreements between the outcomes of the narrative sample analyses and the elicitation test results were found for 25% of children using broad measures, and 38% of children when the grammatical assessment was narrowly focused on errors with articles. These results suggest that an examiner is more likely to find children with similar results between spontaneous and elicited measures, but that the possibility remains of finding children with disagreeing results for both TL children and children at risk because of the well-known heterogeneity found in the language manifestations of children with language disorders. However, the disagreement in the results for both groups of children are such that performance on the language sample might be high while performance in the DEME, our elicited task, is low.</p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Last, in our examination of elicitation methods on the type of errors produced (omissions versus substitutions), we found no evidence of an effect of type of error. Children produced similar error types during the elicitation and spontaneous language sample task. Nonetheless, more errors were attested during the elicited language given that, in a well-designed elicitation task, the items target the most vulnerable structures in the language. These findings suggest that elicitation methods do not have an impact on the type of error produced, independent of the type of measure (broad or narrow).</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The current study has two limitations that are important to acknowledge. First, the score used to separate the children between high and low percentage of errors was arbitrary. The results of this study are interpreted using an 80% cut-off scores, but different cut-off scores might yield different results. Second, the sample size of the study is relatively small. It is possible that higher samples might reveal more variability in performance. Future studies should increase the sample size to examine the difference between elicited and spontaneous language samples.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Conclusion</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our comparison of the two approaches to sampling show results that are in agreement with previous studies, with at-risk children producing more errors and typical children producing less, and elicitation showing more errors than spontaneous language (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0010">Bedore & Leonard, 2001; Castilla-Earls et al., 2020</a>). The magnitude of the discrepancy between our two approaches is substantive, so we conclude that researchers should favor elicited language approaches when the goal is to find differences between the groups. Although most of the children showed results that were in agreement between elicited and spontaneous language, a substantive number of children showed results in disagreement. When errors were in disagreement, we found low performance in elicited language and high performance in spontaneous language. The results of this study suggest that elicited and spontaneous measures do not completely overlap and might provide different information about the language skills of a child, particularly when narrow measures of grammaticality are considered.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Funding statement</span><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Research reported in this publication was supported by the <span class="elsevierStyleGrantSponsor" id="gs1">National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health</span> under Award Number R15DC013670 and 1K23DC015835-01 granted to Anny Castilla-Earls. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Conflict of interest</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No conflict of interest to report.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:11 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1597031" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction and objectives" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods and participants" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1432306" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1597032" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Introducción y objetivos" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Métodos y participantes" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1432307" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Methods" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Participants" ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Measures" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Spontaneous language samples" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Desarrollo Morfológico de Español (DEME)" ] ] ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Procedures" ] ] ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Results" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Conclusion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Funding statement" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Conflict of interest" ] 10 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2020-08-03" "fechaAceptado" => "2021-02-10" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1432306" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Assessment" 1 => "Spontaneous language" 2 => "Elicited language" 3 => "Grammar" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1432307" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Evaluación" 1 => "Lenguaje espontáneo" 2 => "Lenguaje elicitado" 3 => "Grámatica" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Introduction and objectives</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">This study compares data collection approaches in the assessment of grammatical development in Spanish-speaking children. Specifically, we compared error rates produced in data collected using samples from spontaneous language versus elicited production, using both broad (overall) and narrow measures (errors with noun phrases).</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Methods and participants</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Monolingual-Spanish-speaking five-year-olds (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>55) were divided into typical language development (TL) and at-risk (Risk) according to a preexisting test, <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Tamiz de Problemas del Lenguaje</span>. All children completed an elicited production and a narrative task.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Children in the TL group outperform children in the Risk group in all measures used in this study. Statistically significant differences were found between children at Risk and TL children in both spontaneous and elicited language measures, although the effect size of the elicited language measures was considerably higher. Elicited and spontaneous tasks are more likely to produce results that are in accord than in disaccord. However, when results are in disaccord, the results almost always show low performance in elicited language but high performance in spontaneous language. Elicitation methods do not seem to have an impact on the type of error produced for neither narrow nor broad measures.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction and objectives" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods and participants" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Introducción y objetivos</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Este estudio compara los enfoques de recolección de datos para la evaluación del desarrollo gramatical en niños que hablan español. Específicamente, comparamos las tasas de error producidas usando muestras de lenguaje espontáneo versus la producción elicitada, usando medidas generales (todos los errores) y específicas (errores con frases nominales).</p></span> <span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Métodos y participantes</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Los niños monolingües de cinco años de habla hispana (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">n</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>55) se dividieron en dos grupos: desarrollo del lenguaje típico o a riesgo de desórdenes del lenguaje, para lo cual se usó el Tamiz de Problemas del Lenguaje. Todos los niños completaron una producción del lenguaje elicitada y una tarea narrativa.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Resultados</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Los niños del grupo típico superan a los niños del grupo a riesgo en todas las medidas utilizadas en este estudio. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los niños a riesgo y los niños típicos en las medidas de lenguaje espontáneo y elicitado, aunque el tamaño del efecto de las medidas de lenguaje elicitado fue considerablemente mayor. El lenguaje elicitado y espontáneo producen mas resultados que están de acuerdo que en desacuerdo; sin embargo, cuando los resultados están en desacuerdo, casi siempre muestran un bajo rendimiento en el lenguaje elicitado pero un alto rendimiento en el lenguaje espontáneo. Los métodos de obtención no parecen tener un impacto en el tipo de error producido ni para medidas específicas ni amplias.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Introducción y objetivos" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Métodos y participantes" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "etiqueta" => "1" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">There are differences between these broad measures. The number of grammatical error per utterance ris significantly higher than the percentage of ungrammatical utterances because it takes into account all errors present in an utterance, but both indices show similar trends in development (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0030">Castilla-Earls & Eriks-Brophy, 2012</a>).</p>" "identificador" => "fn0005" ] ] "multimedia" => array:6 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1229 "Ancho" => 1675 "Tamanyo" => 78179 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Correlation between broad measures of grammaticality, Percentage of Grammatical Utterances, and Total DEME score, by group.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1218 "Ancho" => 1675 "Tamanyo" => 94539 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Correlation between narrow measures of grammaticality, Percentage of correct articles in spontaneous language sample, and article accuracy in DEME, by group.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at1" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Notes: TL<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Typical Language Group; <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">g</span><span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>Hedge's Effect Size.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Measure \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">TL group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Risk group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">p</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">g</span> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Utterances \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">84.5 (20.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">80.0 (37.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.589 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.559 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.181 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">MLUw \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6.6 (0.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.4 (1.5) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.755 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.957 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Number of articles sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">86.2 (30.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">60.1(34.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.932 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.005 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.796 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PGU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">83.7 (9.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">70.1 (11.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4.822 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.300 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Articles correct sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">98.7 (1.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">91.2 (13.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.778 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.008 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.748 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Articles correct DEME \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">92.8 (14.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">73.0 (22.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">3.864 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.043 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Total DEME \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">38.0 (5.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">25.8 (9.8) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5.638 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">.000 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.525 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2729134.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Descriptive statistics.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at2" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Low DEMELow PGU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Low DEMEHigh PGU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">High DEMELow PGU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">High DEMEHigh PGU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">TL \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">11 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Risk \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">23 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2729133.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Distribution of children who made broad errors by group.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0015" "etiqueta" => "Table 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at3" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Low DEMELow sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Low DEMEHigh sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">High DEMELow sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">High DEMEHigh sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">TL \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">19 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Risk \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2729135.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Distribution of children who made article errors by group.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0020" "etiqueta" => "Table 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at4" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Percentage of errors of omission in sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Percentage of errors of substitution in sample \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Percentage of errors of omission in DEME \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Percentage of errors of substitution in DEME \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">TL \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.6 (1.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">0.5 (1.0) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.0 (3.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.9 (8.9) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Risk \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6.4 (12.2) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1.9 (2.4) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7.8 (9.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="char" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">7.8 (11.3) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2729136.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Descriptive information for Article Errors.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:30 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "Anderson and Souto, 2005" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The use of articles by monolingual Puerto Rican Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R. Anderson" 1 => "S. Souto" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Applied Linguistics" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "26" "paginaInicial" => "621" "paginaFinal" => "647" ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "Auza et al., 2018" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Tamiz para detectar problemas del lenguaje (TPL)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. Auza" 1 => "M. Murata" 2 => "M.E. Márquez" 3 => "G.P. Morgan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "2018" "editorial" => "Manual Moderno" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Mexico" ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "Bedore and Leonard, 2001" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Grammatical morphology deficits in spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "L.M. Bedore" 1 => "L.B. Leonard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/1092-4388(2001/072)" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "44" "numero" => "1–4" "paginaInicial" => "905" "paginaFinal" => "924" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11521782" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "Bishop et al., 2016" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study Identifying language impairments in children" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:20 [ 0 => "D.V.M. Bishop" 1 => "M.J. Snowling" 2 => "P.A. Thompson" 3 => "T. Greenhalgh" 4 => "C. Adams" 5 => "L. Archibald" 6 => "G. Baird" 7 => "A. Bauer" 8 => "J. Bellair" 9 => "C. Boyle" 10 => "E. Brownlie" 11 => "G. Carter" 12 => "B. Clark" 13 => "J. Clegg" 14 => "N. Cohen" 15 => "G. Conti-Ramsden" 16 => "J. Dockrell" 17 => "J. Dunn" 18 => "S. Ebbels" 19 => "A. Whitehouse" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1371/journal.pone.0158753" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "PLoS ONE" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "11" "numero" => "7" "paginaInicial" => "1" "paginaFinal" => "27" "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0022347612000285" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00223476" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "Castilla, 2008" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Castilla, A. (2008). Developmental measures of morphosyntactic acquisition in monolingual 3, 4, and 5 year-old Spanish speaking children. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation." ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "Castilla-Earls et al., 2020" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Morphological errors in monolingual Spanish-speaking children with and without developmental language disorders" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A. Castilla-Earls" 1 => "A. Auza" 2 => "A.T. Pérez-Leroux" 3 => "K. Fulcher-Rood" 4 => "C. Barr" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00022" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools" "fecha" => "2020" "volumen" => "51" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "270" "paginaFinal" => "281" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255752" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "Castilla-Earls and Eriks-Brophy, 2012" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Spontaneous language measures in monolingual Spanish-speaking preschool children" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A.P. Castilla-Earls" 1 => "A. Eriks-Brophy" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.rlfa.2012.04.002" "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "32" "numero" => "3" ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "Castilla-Earls et al., 2015" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Castilla-Earls, A., Restrepo, M. A., Perez-Leroux, A.T., Gray, S., Holmes, P., Gail, D. & Chen, Z. (2015). Interactions between bilingual effects and language impairment: exploring grammatical markers in Spanish-speaking bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1147-1173." ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "Castilla-Earls et al., 2021" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Castilla-Earls, A., Perez-Leroux, A. T., Fulcher-Rood, K., & Barr, C. (2021). Morphological Errors in Bilingual Spanish-Speaking Children with and without Developmental Language Disorders. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools</span>." ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "Gazella and Stockman, 2003" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Children's story retelling under different modality and task conditions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J. Gazella" 1 => "I.J. Stockman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/1058-0360(2003/053)" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "12" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "61" "paginaFinal" => "72" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12680814" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "Gusewski and Rojas, 2017" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Gusewski, S., & Rojas, R. (2017). Tense marking in the English narrative retells of dual language preschoolers. <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48</span>, 183–196." ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "Gutiérrez-Clellen et al., 2000" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Language sample analysis in spanish-speaking children" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "V.F. Gutiérrez-Clellen" 1 => "M.A. Restrepo" 2 => "L. Bedore" 3 => "E. Peña" 4 => "R. Anderson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/0161-1461.3101.88" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "31" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "88" "paginaFinal" => "98" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764338" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "Kaufman and Kaufman, 2014" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, second edition" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "A.S. Kaufman" 1 => "N.L. Kaufman" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1002/9781118660584.ese1325" "Libro" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Encyclopedia of special education" "fecha" => "2014" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "Leonard, 2019" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "SLI across languages" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "L.B. Leonard" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.7551/mitpress/9152.003.0007" "Libro" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Children with specific language impairment" "fecha" => "2019" ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "Lopez-Ornat, 1997" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Lopez-Ornat, S. (1997). What lies in between a pre-grammatical and a grammatical representation? Evidence on nominal and verbal form-function mappings in Spanish from 1:7 to 2:1. In A.T. Perez &.W.R. Glass (Eds.), <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish</span> (pp. 3-20). Somerville: Cascadilla Press." ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "Masterson and Kamhi, 1992" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Linguistic trade-offs in school-age children with and without language disorders" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J.J. Masterson" 1 => "A.G. Kamhi" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/jshr.3505.1064" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research" "fecha" => "1992" "volumen" => "35" "numero" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "1064" "paginaFinal" => "1075" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "Miller and Schmitt, 2010" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effects of variable input in the acquisition of plural in two dialects of Spanish" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K. Miller" 1 => "C. Schmitt" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Lingua" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "120" "numero" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "1178" "paginaFinal" => "1193" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "Morgan et al., 2013" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Comparison of Spanish morphology in monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children with and without language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "G.P. Morgan" 1 => "M.A. Restrepo" 2 => "A. Auza" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1017/S1366728912000697" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Bilingualism" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "16" "numero" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "578" "paginaFinal" => "596" ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "Pérez-Leroux and Battersby, 2009" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Pérez-Leroux, A. T., & Battersby, T. (2009). Early determination. In J. Grinstead (Ed.), <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Hispanic Child Languages</span> (pp. 117-139). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins." ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "Pérez-Leroux et al., 2012" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "General and specific effects of lexicon in grammar: Determiner and object pronoun omissions in child Spanish" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A.T. Pérez-Leroux" 1 => "A.P. Castilla-Earls" 2 => "J. Brunner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0004)" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "55" "numero" => "2" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22337492" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "Pirvulescu, 2006" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Theoretical implications of object clitic omission in early French: Spontaneous vs. elicited production" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M. Pirvulescu" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.5565/rev/catjl.70" "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Catalan Journal of Linguistics" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "5" "paginaInicial" => "221" "paginaFinal" => "236" ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "Plante and Vance, 1994" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Selection of preschool language tests: A data-based approach" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "E. Plante" 1 => "R. Vance" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/0161-1461.2501.15" "Libro" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools" "fecha" => "1994" ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "Restrepo, 1998" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Identifiers of predominantly Spanish-speaking children with language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "M.A. Restrepo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/jslhr.4106.1398" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "41" "numero" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "1398" "paginaFinal" => "1411" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9859894" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "Restrepo et al., 2010" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effects of a supplemental Spanish oral language program on sentnece lenght, complexity, and gramaticality in Spanish-speaking children attending English-only preschools" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M.A. Restrepo" 1 => "A.P. Castilla" 2 => "S. Neuharth-pritchett" 3 => "C.E. Hamilton" 4 => "A. Arboleda" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1044/0161-1461(2009/06-0017)" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "41" "numero" => "January" "paginaInicial" => "3" "paginaFinal" => "13" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19901038" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "Restrepo and Gutierrez-Clellen, 2001" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Article production in bilingual children with specific language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M.A. Restrepo" 1 => "V.F. Gutierrez-Clellen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1017/s0305000901004706" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Journal of Child Language" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "28" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "433" "paginaFinal" => "452" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11449946" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "Reuterskiöld Wagner et al., 2000" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Conversation versus narration in pre-school children with language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "C. Reuterskiöld Wagner" 1 => "U. Nettelbladt" 2 => "B. Sahlén" 3 => "C. Nilholm" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1080/136828200247269" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "35" "numero" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "83" "paginaFinal" => "93" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10824226" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "Rojas and Iglesias, 2013" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The language growth of Spanish-speaking English language learners" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R. Rojas" 1 => "A. Iglesias" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01871.x" "Libro" => array:4 [ "fecha" => "2013" "paginaInicial" => "630" "paginaFinal" => "646" "editorial" => "WileySociety for Research in Child Development" ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "Serra et al., 2000" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "La adquisición del lenguaje" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "M. Serra" 1 => "E. Serrat" 2 => "R. Solé" 3 => "A. Bel" 4 => "M. Aparici" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Libro" => array:3 [ "fecha" => "2000" "editorial" => "Ariel" "editorialLocalizacion" => "Barcelona, Spain" ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib3345" "etiqueta" => "Simon-Cereijido and Gutiérrez-Clellen, 2007" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Spontaneous language markers of Spanish language impairment" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "G. Simon-Cereijido" 1 => "V.F. Gutiérrez-Clellen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Applied Psycholinguistics" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "28" "numero" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "317" "paginaFinal" => "339" ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "Snyder, 2007" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "referenciaCompleta" => "Snyder, W. (2007). Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress." ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/02144603/0000004100000004/v1_202110260716/S0214460321000504/v1_202110260716/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "7595" "tipo" => "SECCION" "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Originales" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/02144603/0000004100000004/v1_202110260716/S0214460321000504/v1_202110260716/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00004N&text.app=https://www.elsevier.es/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0214460321000504?idApp=UINPBA00004N" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 March | 5 | 2 | 7 |
2023 November | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2023 July | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2023 May | 2 | 2 | 4 |
2023 March | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2023 January | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2022 November | 5 | 2 | 7 |
2022 September | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2022 May | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2022 April | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2022 March | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2022 February | 3 | 6 | 9 |
2022 January | 6 | 4 | 10 |
2021 December | 5 | 14 | 19 |
2021 November | 4 | 4 | 8 |
2021 October | 2 | 0 | 2 |
2021 July | 9 | 10 | 19 |