covid
Buscar en
Allergologia et Immunopathologia
Toda la web
Inicio Allergologia et Immunopathologia Effectiveness of nebulized furosemide added to nebulized salbutamol in children ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 34. Núm. 2.
Páginas 54-58 (marzo 2006)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 34. Núm. 2.
Páginas 54-58 (marzo 2006)
Acceso a texto completo
Effectiveness of nebulized furosemide added to nebulized salbutamol in children with acute asthma
Eficacia de la furosemida nebulizada añadida al salbutamol nebulizado en los niños con crisis de asma
Visitas
11119
Çağatay Nuhoğlua, Mehmet Yaşar K¿l¿çb, Ömer Ceranc
a Pediatrician in Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital. Department of Pediatrics. Istanbul. Turkey.
b Family physician in Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul. Turkey.
c Associate professor of pediatrics, chief director in Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital. Department of Pediatrics. Istanbul. Turkey.
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (8)
Table. I Clinical Asthma Score (CAS)
Figure 1. --Study design. CAS: Clinical Asthma Score; PEFR: Peak Expiratory Flow Rate.
Table. II Patients' demographic characteristics
Table. III Clinical Asthma Score (CAS) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) (L/min) before treatment
Table. IV Clinical Asthma Score (CAS) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) (L/min) after treatment
Table. V Pre- and post-treatment Clinical Asthma Score (CAS) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) (L/min) in the study group
Table. VI Pre- and post-treatment Clinical Asthma Score (CAS) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) (L/min) in the control group
Table. VII Changes in pre- and post-treatment Clinical Asthma Score (CAS) and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) (L/min) in the study and control groups
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Background: Nebulized furosemide has been shown to be protective against bronchoconstricting stimuli. Methods: To investigate whether inhaled furosemide would exhibit an additional therapeutic effect in children with acute asthma we performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which patients with acute asthma attack were randomized to receive either nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) plus nebulized furosemide (10 mg/m²) or nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) plus nebulized saline as placebo. In all patients, clinical asthma scores (CAS) were determined before and after drug administration. Peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were measured by a peak flow meter. Results: CAS and PEFR improved in both groups with nebulized salbutamol treatment. The CAS changed from 3.56 ± 2.13 to 2.06 ± 1.84 (p = 0.0001) in the study group and from 4.44 ± 2.63 to 2.56 ± 1.86 (p = 0.0003) in the control group. PEFR increased from 177.50 ± 65.88 to 221.88 ± 66.05 L/min in the first group (p = 0.0001) and from 183.13 ± 51.73 to 218.13 ± 60.25 in the second group (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Adding nebulized furosemide to nebulized salbutamol in pediatric patients experiencing an acute asthma attack did not produce greater improvement in clinical (p = 0.3829) or spirometric (p = 0.3839) parameters than nebulized salbutamol alone.
Keywords:
Asthma
Acute
Children
Furosemide
Antecedentes: Se ha demostrado que la furosemida nebulizada protege frente a estímulos broncoconstrictores. Métodos: Con objeto de investigar si la furosemida inhalada tedría un efecto terapéutico adicionesl en niños con crisis de asma, un grupo de pacientes escogidos aleatoriamente, con crisis de asma recibieron bien salbutamol nebulizado (0.15 mg/kg) más furosemida nebulizada (10 mg/m²) bien salbutamol nebulizado (0,15 mg/kg) más solución salina como placebo. Se trata de un estudio doble ciego controlado con placebo. Antes y después de administrar los medicamentos, todos los pacientes se evaluaron clínicamente mediante un test de puntuación. Con un medidor de flujo se valoró el pico de flujo espiratorio (PEFR) a todos los pacientes. Resultados: La puntuación clínica y el PEF mejoraron en ambos grupos tratados con salbutamol. En el grupo en estudio, la puntuación clínica cambió de 3.56 ± 2.13 a 2.06 ± 1.84 (p=0.0001), y en el grupo control con placebo cambió de 4.44 ± 2.63 a 2.56 ± 1.86 (p=0.0003). El PEFR aumentó de177.50 ± 65.88 a 221.88 ± 66.05 L/min en el primer grupo (p=0.0001) y de 183.13 ± 51.73 a 218.13 ± 60.25 en el segundo grupo (p=0.0001). Conclusión: La adición de furosemida nebulizada al salbutamol nebulizado en pacientes pediátricos con crisis aguda de asma, no supone una ventaja para la mejoría de los parámetros clínicos (p=0.3829) ni del PEF (p=0.3839) frente al uso de salbutamol nebulizado solo.
Palabras clave:
Asma
Crisis aguda, Niños, Furosemida
Texto completo

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled furosemide, one of the loop diuretics, has been shown to have a protective effect against bronchoconstriction in asthma induced by exercise 1, hyperventilation in cold air 2, inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water 3, and other stimuli 4. These studies have shown that when furosemide is administered as an aerosol, it can prevent or ameliorate asthma exacerbations. However, a therapeutic effect has not yet been established.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether inhaled furosemide has a therapeutic effect in children with acute asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

Children who were diagnosed with asthma according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society 5 were included in the study.

The inclusion criteria were:

1. Mild or moderate asthma exacerbation with a clinical asthma score of between 1 and 6.

2. Age between 5 and 14 years.

3. Ability to perform a peak flow meter test.

Study design

The study design was double-blind and placebo-controlled. Patients were randomized to receive either nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) (Ventolin nebules 2.5 mg/2.5 mL, Glaxo Wellcome Inc.) plus nebulized furosemide (10 mg/m 2) (Lasix 20 mg/2 mL, Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.) (Group 1), or nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) alone with nebulized saline as placebo (Group 2). Randomization was performed according to the patient's social security number. In all patients, the clinical asthma score (CAS) was determined before and after treatment. The CAS was modified from Becker's pulmonary index score 6 (table I).

Peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were measured by a peak flow meter (Clement Clarke, Essex, England). The best of the successfully performed maneuvers was recorded (fig. 1).

Figure 1.--Study design. CAS: Clinical Asthma Score; PEFR: Peak Expiratory Flow Rate.

Statistics

Age was compared between the two groups with the Mann-Whitney U test. Gender was compared with Fisher's exact test. CAS and PEFR values before and after treatments were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Pre- and post-treatment CAS and PEFR values in the study and control groups were compared with Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-rank test. The changes in pre- and post-treatment CAS and PEFR values in the study and control groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed by Graphpad Instat ver. 3.05 (Graphpad Software Inc. San Diego, CA, USA).

RESULTS

There were 16 patients in the study group (Group 1), with 8 boys and 8 girls. The mean age in this group was 8.6 ± 3.0 years (table II). There were 16 patients in the control group (Group 2), with 12 boys and 4 girls. The mean age in this group was 8.4 ± 2.3 years (table II). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender or age (p = 0.2734 and p = 0.9699 respectively).

The mean baseline CAS was 3.56 ± 2.13 in the study group and 4.44 ± 2.63 in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to baseline CAS (p = 0.2730) (table III). The baseline PEFR was 177.50 ± 65.88 in the study group and 183.13 ± 51.73 L/min in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to PEFR (p = 0.4852) (table III). After treatment CAS was 2.06 ± 1.84 in the study group and 2.56 ± 1.86 in the control group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5204) (table IV). The post-treatment PEFR was 221.88 ± 66.05 in the study group and 218.13 ± 60.25 L/min in the control group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 9248) (table IV).

In both groups, CAS and PEFR significantly improved after treatment (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001 respectively for Group 1 and p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0001 respectively for Group 2) (tables V and VI). However, the addition of nebulized furosemide to nebulized salbutamol did not produce a significantly greater improvement in clinical or PEFR values than nebulized salbutamol alone (table VII).

DISCUSSION

Although inhaled furosemide has been shown to have a protective effect against many bronchoconstrictive agents and exercise 7-10, its effectiveness in the acute setting is still debated.

Our study compared inhaled salbutamol alone with a combination of inhaled salbutamol and inhaled furosemide in children with acute asthma. Our results demonstrate that the addition of inhaled furosemide to inhaled salbutamol did not improve clinical or PEFR parameters.

The first study to investigate the effectiveness of inhaled furosemide in the acute setting was conducted by Karpel et al 11. These investigators compared three groups: the first group received inhaled furosemide 40 mg, the second group received metaproterenol 15 mg and the third group received 40 mg furosemide plus 15 mg metaproterenol. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after the treatment. FEV1 significantly increased in the patients treated with metaproterenol alone but the change in FEV1 produced by the addition of furosemide was not statistically different compared with that produced by metaproterenol alone. The results of these authors are fairly similar to our own, except that their study was conducted in adults.

Tanigaki et al 12 investigated the effectiveness of inhaled furosemide in 7 adults with acute asthma who had not responded to conventional therapy with sympathomimetic agents, corticosteroids, and aminophylline. These authors reported that the addition of furosemide to this conventional therapy significantly improved PaCO2.

The above study differs from our study in several respects, which may explain the dissimilar results. Firstly, the study by Tanigaki et al was conducted in adults. Secondly, their study was not double-blind and placebo-controlled and the number of patients included was very small. Thirdly, the patients in their study had severe acute asthma refractory to conventional therapy whereas our study investigated pediatric patients with mild or moderate asthma who had not received any acute treatment.

Another study in adults, conducted by Ono et al 13, investigated the effect of furosemide in addition to aminophylline plus hydrocortisone using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. These authors reported that the addition of furosemide resulted in a statistically significant improvement in FEV1 and PEFR. The difference between the results of this study and those of our own may be due to the combination used and the age of the patients.

Pendino et al 14 investigated the effectiveness of adding nebulized furosemide to nebulized salbutamol in adult patients referred to the emergency department with an acute asthma attack. The patients were evaluated both clinically and with PEFR. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was very similar to our own with respect to the study design and results but differed in that our study was conducted in children. Pendino et al report that adding nebulized furosemide to nebulized salbutamol did not produce greater improvement than placebo. However, they report that a subgroup of patients that had been referred to the emergency department within the first 8 hours of the attack showed a significantly greater improvement in both variables. In our study we did not divide the patients according to the duration of the attack. This could be the subject of future investigations in which patients with short attacks are evaluated.

Another double-blind, placebo-controlled study with similar results to those of our own was conducted by Rodrigez et al 15. These investigators evaluated adult patients with acute asthma attacks treated by nebulized furosemide in addition to nebulized salbutamol and found no statistically significant differences in spirometric values.

Recently, Hinckley et al 16 reported no statistically significant differences in adult patients treated with nebulized albuterol plus nebulized furosemide in comparison with patients treated with nebulized albuterol plus placebo.

Gonzalez-Sanchez et al 17 conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled pediatric study to investigate the effectiveness of the combination of nebulized albuterol plus nebulized furosemide compared with placebo and found no significant differences in spirometric values (FEV1). The study design and results of this study are fairly similar to those of our own.

We conclude that the addition of nebulized furosemide to nebulized salbutamol in pediatric patients with an acute asthma attack does not produce greater improvement in clinical and spirometric parameters than nebulized salbutamol alone. The effectiveness of this combination in the subacute phase of the attacks could be the subject of future analyses.


Correspondence:
Çag(breve)atay Nuhog(breve)lu, MD
Yes¸ilbahar sokak, Savas¸ Apt. No: 16/16
Göztepe. 34730 Istanbul. Turkey
E-mail: cnuhoglu@e-kolay.net
Web: http://www.haydarpasanumune.gov.tr

Bibliography
[1]
Bianco S, Vaghi A, Robushi M, Pasargiklian M..
Prevention of exercise induced bronchoconstriction by inhaled furosemide..
Lancet, 2 (1988), pp. 252-5
[2]
Grubbe RE, Hopp R, Dave NK, Brennan B, Bewtra A, Townley R..
Effect of inhaled furosemide on the bronchial response to methacholine and cold-air hyperventilation challenges..
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 85 (1990), pp. 881-4
[3]
Bianco S, Vaghi A, Pieroni MG..
Potentiation of the protective effect of inhaled furosemide on the bronchial response to ultrasonically nebulized water by inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate..
Eur Respir J, 4 (1991), pp. 606S
[4]
Blanco S, Pieroni MG, Refini RM, Robushi M, Vaghi A, Sestini P..
Inhaled loop diuretics as potential new anti-asthmatic drugs..
Eur Respir J, 6 (1993), pp. 130-4
[5]
American Thoracic Society..
Standard for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma..
Am Rev Respir Dis, 136 (1987), pp. 225-43
[6]
Becker AB, Nelson NA, Simons ER..
The Pulmonary Index: Assessment of a clinical score for asthma..
Am J Dis Child, 138 (1984), pp. 574-6
[7]
Sierra-Johnson J..
Inhaled furosemide: a whole new mechanism of action..
Med Hypotheses, 58 (2002), pp. 529-30
[8]
Tan RA, Spector SL..
Exercise-induced asthma..
Sports Med, 25 (1998), pp. 1-6
[9]
Siffredi M, Mastropasqua B, Pelucchi A, Chiesa M, Marazzini L, Foresi A..
Effect of inhaled furosemide and cromolyn on bronchoconstriction induced by ultrasonically nebulized distilled water in asthmatic subjects..
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 78 (1997), pp. 238-43
[10]
Inhaled transmembrane ion transport modulators and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in asthma. Thorax. 2000;55 Suppl 2: S48-50.
[11]
Karpel JP, Dworkin F, Hager D, Feliciano S, Shapiro D, Posner L, Luks D..
Inhaled furosemide is not effective in acute asthma..
Chest, 106 (1994), pp. 1396-400
[12]
Tanigaki T, Kondo T, Hayashi Y, Katoh H, Kamio K, Urano T, Ohta Y..
Rapid response to inhaled frusemide in severe acute asthma with hypercapnia..
Respiration, 64 (1997), pp. 108-10
[13]
Ono Y, Kondo T, Tanigaki T, Ohta Y..
Furosemide given by inhalation ameliorates acute exacerbation of asthma..
J Asthma, 34 (1997), pp. 283-9
[14]
Pendino JC, Nannini LJ, Chapman KR, Slutsky A, Molfino NA..
Effect of inhaled furosemide in acute asthma..
J Asthma, 35 (1998), pp. 89-93
[15]
Rodriguez Vazquez JC, Pino Alfonso PP, Gassiot Nuno C, Paez Prats I..
Usefulness of inhaled furosemide in a bronchial asthma attack..
J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol, 8 (1998), pp. 290-3
[16]
Inhaled furosemide in the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(10):1167.
[17]
Gonzalez-Sanchez R, Trujillo-Hernandez B, Huerta M, Vasquez C, Trujillo X..
Furosemide plus albuterol compared with albuterol alone in children with acute asthma..
Allergy Asthma Proc, 23 (2002), pp. 181-4
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.aller.2020.05.005
No mostrar más