metricas
covid
Buscar en
Annals of Hepatology
Toda la web
Inicio Annals of Hepatology P- 16 HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN CENTRAL AMERICA: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH ...
Información de la revista
Vol. 29. Núm. S1.
Abstracts of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(febrero 2024)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 29. Núm. S1.
Abstracts of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the ALEH
(febrero 2024)
Acceso a texto completo
P- 16 HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN CENTRAL AMERICA: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH IN A COSTA RICAN COHORT
Visitas
155
María Castro, Francisco Vargas, María Lynch, Aldo Carvajal, Esteban Cob, Daniel Mondragón, Víctor Alvarado, Alejandra Ochoa, Bruno Solís, Vanessa López, Sheyla Araya, Irene Mora, Silvia Alfaro, Dionisio Flores, Allan Ramos, Gerardo Avendaño, Pablo Coste
Liver Unit, Hospital R.A. Calderón Guardia, CCSS, San José, Costa Rica
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Suplemento especial
Este artículo forma parte de:
Vol. 29. Núm S1

Abstracts of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the ALEH

Más datos
Introduction and Objectives

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major problem in Latin America, but international guidelines do not consider the sociocultural heterogeneity and economic disparities in the region. We review the multidisciplinary approach and results from the largest cohort to date reporting on HCC in Central America.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of a cohort of HCC diagnosed radiographically or histologically and analysis of the multidisciplinary approach.

Results

from 10/2018 to 03/2023, 186 cirrhotic patients with HCC were evaluated. Distribution according to BCLC staging system was: 3, 46, 17, 22, and 12% for stage 0 to D, respectively. As initial treatment, most patients received transarterial therapy (TA) (n=79, 43%) followed by ablation (n=29, 16%), systemic treatment (ST) (n=11, 6%), surgical resection (n=9, 5%) and liver transplantation (LT) without bridging therapy (n=3, 2%). Based on current EASL guidelines, 49% of patients received a BCLC-recommended treatment strategy and 51% had a stage migration strategy based on multidisciplinary decisions: 0: 33% TA, A: 59% TA, B: 31% ST, C: 61% palliative and 17% TA. Main reasons for migration strategy were the location of the lesion (0/A to TA), risk factors for decompensation after TA (B to ST) and limited access to ST. Using selected criteria (<65 years, San Francisco criteria and no apparent contraindications), 21% (n=39) were candidates for LT: 38% (n=15) progressed or died outside the LT list (LTL), 10% (n=4) were managed with another treatment and remain off LTL, 26% receive LT (n=10) and 3% (n=1) drop out or die on LTL. Main reason for LT rate among candidates is low availability of donors and waiting time on list (mean rate 2018-2022: 5.72DD/pmp/y, mean waiting time: 236 days).

Conclusions

factors such as availability of resources and local experience frequently lead to multidisciplinary approaches adapted to health system and divergent from the established guidelines.

El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos

Quizás le interese:
10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101210
No mostrar más