metricas
covid
Buscar en
Annals of Hepatology
Toda la web
Inicio Annals of Hepatology The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Americas
Información de la revista
Vol. 13. Núm. 2.
Páginas 166-178 (marzo - abril 2014)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
7648
Vol. 13. Núm. 2.
Páginas 166-178 (marzo - abril 2014)
Open Access
The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Americas
Visitas
7648
Jorge A. López-Velázquez*, Karen V. Silva-Vidal*, Guadalupe Ponciano-Rodríguez**, Norberte C. Chávez-Tapia*, Marco Arrese***, Misael Uribe*, Nahum Méndez-Sánchez
,
Autor para correspondencia
nmendez@medicasur.org.mx

Correspondence and reprint request:
* Liver Research Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico
** Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. Mexico City, Mexico
*** Departamento de Gastroenterología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (4)
Table 1. Prevalence of NAFLD in some countries.
Table 2. Studies conducted on the prevalence of NAFLD in high risk populations in several countries across the Americas.
Table 3. Studies in the Americas on genetic modifiers of NAFLD.
Table 4. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Americas.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an alarming public health problem. The disease is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease worldwide and is directly linked to the increased prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the general population. The worldwide prevalence of NAFLD has been estimated at 20-30%, but the prevalence is unknown in the Americas because of a lack of epidemiological studies. However, given the trends in the prevalence of diabetes and obesity, the prevalence of NAFLD and its consequences are expected to increase in the near future. The aim of the present study is to present the current data on the prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas. We performed an electronic search of the main databases from January 2000 to September 2013 and identified 356 reports that were reviewed. We focused on the epidemiology and prevalence of known NAFLD risk factors including obesity, T2DM, and the metabolic syndrome (MS). The prevalence of the MS was highest in the United States, Mexico, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico, Chile, and Venezuela. In addition, Puerto Rico, Guyana, and Mexico have the highest prevalence of T2DM in the Americas, while USA has the most people with T2DM. In conclusion, the prevalence rates of NAFLD and obesity were highest in the United States, Belize, Barbados, and Mexico.

Keywords:
Obesity
Metabolic syndrome
Diabetes mellitus
Epidemiology
Texto completo
Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) refers to the presence of hepatic steatosis, as demonstrated by imaging or by histology, in the setting of no significant alcohol consumption and the absence of other known secondary causes.1 NAFLD is strongly associated with obesity and metabolic disturbances such as insulin resistance (IR), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia. In the past few decades, obesity has become an epidemic health problem and, as a consequence, we are witnessing an increase in the prevalence of NAFLD in all age groups. NAFLD has become the most frequent cause of chronic liver disease in Western countries.2 Because the populations in the Americas seem to be particularly susceptible to obesity and T2DM, and because of the increasingly inactive lifestyles with abundant and high-energy food, NAFLD is expected to become a highly prevalent disorder in this world region.3

NAFLD is associated with increases in all-cause and liver-related mortality compared with the general population, in fact cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in NAFLD patients. Thus, the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of NAFLD and concomitant metabolic disorders in these individuals are of high priority to health systems in the Americas.1,4 The aim of this review is to examine the available information on the prevalence of NAFLD and/or related disorders in the Americas and to generate good estimates of the magnitude of the problem in this continent.

Definition and natural history of NAFLD

NAFLD is defined as the presence of lipid accumulation within hepatocytes accounting for > 5% of the total liver weight (mainly in the perivenular region and periportal areas)5 together with no evidence of significant alcohol consumption (defined as > 21 drinks per week in men or > 14 drinks per week in women over the preceding 2-year period, or > 10 g of daily alcohol consumption at the current time), and no current treatment with steatogenic medication or presence of a dietary disorder.1

Clinically, NAFLD comprises a broad pathological spectrum that includes simple steatosis; fatty liver accompanied by inflammation, fibrogenesis, and hepatocellular necrosis (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH); increased fibrosis and the consequent loss of liver function (cirrhosis); and, in some cases, development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1,5

In 10-20% of NAFLD patients with simple fatty liver disease, the disease will progress to NASH, and 3-5% might develop cirrhosis.5 The prevalence of HCC in cirrhotic patients with NASH is 2-3% per year; cirrhotic patients have a lower risk of developing HCC compared with those infected with hepatitis C virus.6,7

Diagnosis

Most NAFLD patients are asymptomatic, and the diagnosis often follows abnormal findings from routine biochemistry tests, an abdominal ultrasound, or assessment of cardiovascular risk.8

NAFLD screening is controversial in asymptomatic and even in high-risk patients.9 Although liver biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH, this method has several disadvantages such as cost, invasiveness, and dependence on the operator’s skill, and the fact that because the histological features (e.g., inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning) are distributed unequally throughout the liver parenchyma, the disease can be misdiagnosed. In addition, diagnosis based on pathology results is often not possible in community-based research studies and clinical practice settings.1

Alternatively, several noninvasive markers or tests have been proposed for diagnostic purposes including biochemical criteria (aminotransferase levels) and hepatic imaging (ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging), however these markers and tests have limitations.

Mild to moderate elevation of serum aminotransferase levels is the most frequent and often the only laboratory abnormality found in patients with NAFLD; however, most people with NAFLD have normal aminotransferase levels.10 Thus, studies using liver enzyme measures probably underestimate the prevalence of NAFLD. The best noninvasive method for diagnosing steatosis seems to be ultrasound (US).9 However, US has one important disadvantage: low accuracy in people with NAFLD and other conditions such as high body mass index (BMI) or steatosis < 10% of liver weight.11 Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) is better than US in detecting and quantifying minor fat infiltration, and it can detect steatosis as low as 3% of total liver weight.12,13

A number of biomarkers have been developed to differentiate between simple steatosis and NASH: blood cytokeratin-18 fragment, adipocyte fatty acid binding protein, and fibroblast growth factor 21.14,15,16 Although these biomarkers hold great promise as noninvasive markers of NASH, they must be confirmed in independent cohorts to achieve better diagnostic accuracy.

Epidemiology

The epidemiology of NAFLD is an intense area of research worldwide. Several studies have reported a prevalence of 20-30% in unselected populations from developed countries7,10,17 and a prevalence of 2.7-12.2% for NASH.18 In a recent prospective cohort study of asymptomatic middle-aged patients using US and liver biopsy, the prevalence rates of NAFLD and NASH were reported as 46% and 12.2%, respectively.18,19 The incidence has been estimated at one in three adults in the developed world,20 Europe, parts of Africa, and Asia.2 NAFLD can affect individuals at any age.

In the Americas, most studies of NAFLD have focused on specific groups instead of the general population, and there are few studies on the overall prevalence of NAFLD in specific countries or regions. Hence, the exact incidence and prevalence throughout the continent remains unknown. The prevalence of NAFLD is expected to increase in the Americas given the socioeconomic and demographic transitions over the past 20 years and the associated unhealthy dietary habits, acquisition of an industrial urban lifestyle, and changes in epidemiological profile of disease prevalence, especially in South America.21 There has been an increase in the prevalence of chronic noncommunicable diseases, mainly cardiovascular disease and cancer, because of the increases in longevity and decreases in the prevalence of infectious diseases.2124

The demographic transition in Mexico has been marked by shifts from high to low fertility and mortality, and by population aging. Nutrition has shifted from a high prevalence of undernutrition to a predominance of diet-related noncommunicable chronic diseases. These changes are associated with rapid processes of urbanization and economic growth because of technological changes and innovations, which have led to reduced physical activity levels and changes in food patterns and dietary intake, including increased consumption of energy-dense processed foods.25

In this context, health interventions to prevent or manage chronic diseases become important because of the 10 leading causes of mortality in adults in the Americas, seven are chronic diseases.26

The prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas has been investigated using different diagnostic methods, and varies depending on the screening test used and the specific population studied. Table 1 summarizes the results of some studies that have published the prevalence of NAFLD in the United States (USA) and Latin American countries. Interpretation of these findings should take into account the source population and the operational definition of NAFLD used in the studies.

Table 1.

Prevalence of NAFLD in some countries.

Country (reference)  Population study (n)  NAFLD diagnosis  Prevalence of NAFLD (%)  Prevalence of NASH (%) 
USA30  Population-based cohort study (15,676)  ALT  5.4  NA 
USA10  Population-based cohort study (2,287)  HMRS  31  NA 
USA32  IRAS Family Study (1,142)  CT  24  NA 
USA37  Adult participants (12,454)  US  19  NA 
USA38  Healthy living liver donors (284)  Biopsy  37  15 NASH 
Mexico35  General asymptomatic population (2,503)  US  17.1   
Brazil39  Brazilian middle-aged and older adults  US  35.2   
Brazil40,41  Brazilian patients (3,156)  US  18*  NA 
Brazil42  Asymptomatic Brazilian adolescents  US/ALT  2 3**  NA 
Chile36  Hispanic subjects (832)  US  23  NA 
Bogota, Colombia34  Males from the Colombian Air Force (263)  US  26.6  NA 

ALT: alanine aminotransferase. NA: not applicable. HMRS: magnetic resonance spectroscopy. CT: computed tomography. US: ultrasound.

*

Prevalence of NAFLD; frequency of NAFLD is unknown.

**

Most were from African descent.

NAFLD is the most frequent cause of abnormal liver biochemistry findings in many developed and developing countries.27,28 In the USA, NAFLD seems to be more prevalent when diagnosed by 1H MRS and liver biopsy than by aminotransferase levels. In a study of the frequency of elevated aminotransferase levels as a surrogate for NAFLD and the MS in overweight multiethnic children/adolescents from South and Central America and the Caribbean, Hispanics had higher enzyme levels than Afro-Caribbeans.29

Several population studies have been performed to estimate NAFLD prevalence in the USA. A cohort study showed that 2.8-5.4% have abnormal liver enzyme levels unrelated to alcohol, viral hepatitis, or iron overload17,30 and that 66-90% of such cases are probably secondary to NAFLD.31 However, this method for NAFLD diagnosis has low specificity for detecting NAFLD. Another study using 1H MRS in all participants in the Dallas Heart Study (32.1% Caucasians, 48.3% African Americans, and 17.5% Hispanics) concluded that the prevalence of hepatic steatosis varies significantly with ethnicity (45% in Hispanics; 33% in whites; 24% in African Americans). The differences in the prevalence of NAFLD also appeared to be related to the higher prevalence of obesity and IR in Hispanics. They also reported that one in three adult Americans and one in 10 children/adolescents have steatosis, which equates to > 70 million adult Americans with NAFLD.10

Another study that examined risk factors for and heritability of NAFLD found that NAFLD was more common in Hispanic Americans than in African Americans. Insulin sensitivity and visceral adipose tissue correlated independently with NAFLD to a similar extent in the two ethnic groups. Age, triglyceride level, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 level were also significantly associated with NAFLD in Hispanics, whereas adiponectin was independently associated with NAFLD only in African Americans.32

The prevalence of NAFLD has been studied in some Latin American countries. In a multicenter analysis of 1,280 patients in Brazil, liver biopsy was performed in 437 patients, and isolated steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis were found in 42%, 58%, and 27% of these patients, respectively.33 A cross-sectional study in Bogota, Colombia, reported a prevalence of 26.6% of NAFLD in the young male Hispanic population.34 A cohort study of 2,503 Mexican patients who underwent a medical examination35 and a study of the general population in Chile,36 both of which used US to diagnose NAFLD, found prevalence rates of 17.1% and 22%, respectively10,30,32,3442 (Table 1). From the data published to date, it appears that the highest prevalence is in the USA, where biopsy is used for diagnosis, whereas the prevalence is lower in Brazil, where US is used.

Table 24353 summarizes the results of several studies on the prevalence of NAFLD in high-risk populations by country. These studies show that the prevalence is as high as 99% in groups with common risk factors such as T2DM, obesity, and/or the MS, and in specific high-risk groups such as those with morbid obesity or polycystic ovary syndrome.

Table 2.

Studies conducted on the prevalence of NAFLD in high risk populations in several countries across the Americas.

Country  Population study (n)  NAFLD diagnosis  Prevalence of NAFLD (%)  Prevalence of NASH, fibrosis, cirrhosis (%) 
USA43  Metabolic syndrome (4,376)  ALT   
USA44  Chronic Liver Disease Registry (742)  US/CT  39.1   
USA45  Polycystic ovary syndrome (88)  US  54.5   
USA46  Bariatric surgery patients (233)  Biopsy  97  32.6 NASH, 31.3 fibrosis 
Mexico47  Metabolic syndrome (337)  US  15.7   
Mexico48  Metabolic syndrome (198)  US  82.9   
Mexico49  Polycystic ovary syndrome (197)  US  62   
Brazil50  Bariatric surgery patients (146)  Biopsy  76  41.1 NASH 
Brazil51  Bariatric surgery patients (112)  Biopsy  99.1  55.7 NASH/ 21.6 fibrosis 
Brazil52  Diabetic patients (98)  Biopsy  20  78 NASH/ 34 to 60 fibrosis 26.0 NASH/ 1.6 cirrhosis 
Chile53  Bariatric surgery patients (127)  Biopsy  63  26.0 NASH/ 1.6 cirrhosis 

ALT: alanine aminotransferase. CT: computed tomography. US: ultrasound.

Studies of the prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas have mainly used US to diagnose the disease in large populations, whereas liver biopsy is mainly restricted to high-risk populations. The available data suggest that the prevalence of NAFLD is increasing in this continent (Tables 1 and 2).18,20

NAFLD is a complex condition that involves ethnic, genetic, and environmental factors that determine its development and progression. The prevalence of NAFLD increases with age and is highest in men aged 40-65 years. There is some debate about whether the prevalence is higher in men or women, but some studies have found that NAFLD and NASH are more common in men (Table 2). It is noteworthy that family members of NAFLD patients have a higher risk of developing NAFLD regardless of age and BMI.27

Risk FactorsEthnicity

The population in the Americas is a complex mix of human groups, especially in South America, one of the most diverse regions in the world. Ethnicity is an important predictor for chronic liver disease complications and has a strong influence on the response to treatment of chronic liver disease.44

NAFLD affects all ethnicities, although previous studies have shown that Hispanics have a higher prevalence of NAFLD than do African Americans or Caucasians and that Hispanics may be considered the ethnic group with the highest risk. This increased risk may reflect the higher rates of IR and visceral adiposity at equivalent BMI in Hispanics compared with other ethnic groups.44,54,55

A cohort study of 1,026 adults from several ethnic groups with biopsy-proven NAFLD studied the severity of the disease. Latinos with NASH were younger, performed less physical activity, had higher carbohydrate intake, and were more than six times more likely to have acanthosis nigricans compared with non-Latino whites with NASH who had Homeostasis Model of Assessment-IR as a significant risk factor and a higher prevalence of hypertension.56 These data suggest that NAFLD is more prevalent among Hispanics individuals and less prevalent among African Americans.19,30,44,54

Genetics

Family and interethnic variation studies suggest that genetic factors are important risk determinants of the susceptibility to and severity of NAFLD (Table 3). Multiple polymorphisms in genes affecting lipid metabolism, cytokine regulation, fibrotic mediators, and oxidative stress may be associated with lipid content and with the development and progression of steatohepatitis and/or fibrosis.57

Table 3.

Studies in the Americas on genetic modifiers of NAFLD.

Study  Population  Phenotype  Participants (n)  Genetic modifiers 
Romeo, et al. (2008)  US (mixed ethnicity)  1H-MRS-measured steatosis  2,051 (1,032 black; 636 white; 383 Hispanic)  PNPLA3 (rs738409) 
Chalasani, et al. (2010)  US (all female, European white ancestry)  Histologically-characterized NAFLD  236  FDFT1 (rs2645424) COL13A1 (rs1227756) EFCAB4B (rs887304) PZP (rs6487679) Chromosome 7 (rs343062) 
Speliotes, et al. (2011)  US and European (meta-analysis of previous studies)  CT-measured steatosis  7,176  PNPLA3 (rs738409) NCAN (rs2228603) GCKR (rs780094) LYPLAL1 (rs12137855) PPP1R3B (rs4240624) 
Oliveira, et al. (2010)  Brazilian patients  Histologically-characterized NAFLD and NASH  131  MTP (493) G/T 
Mendez, et al. (2010)  Mexican patients  US and biochemical data  189  PNPLA3 (rs738409) 

Interestingly, inherited factors play a major role in the susceptibility to NASH. For example, the rs738409 C/G single-nucleotide polymorphism of patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 (PNPLA3), which encodes the I148M protein variant, was identified by a genome-wide approach as a strong genetic determinant of liver fat content independently of body mass, dyslipidemia, and IR. This polymorphism also has been associated with NASH and progressive fibrosis in patients with steatosis.

Several studies have shown that polymorphism in the PNPLA3 gene predicts the extent of steatosis in NAFLD. For example, a recent meta-analysis estimated the strength of the effect of the I148 PNPLA3 variant on NAFLD and disease severity across different populations. This meta-analysis showed that rs738409 exerted a strong influence on liver fat accumulation and on the susceptibility to more aggressive disease.58

Other studies have investigated the association of polymorphisms of glutamate-cysteine ligase and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) genes with NAFLD in Brazilian patients with biopsy-proven simple steatosis or NASH. The 493 G/T polymorphism in the MTP gene encodes the protein responsible for transferring triglycerides to nascent apolipoprotein B, and 129 C/T in the GCLC gene encodes the catalytic subunit of glutamate-cysteine ligase in the formation of glutathione. The presence of at least one T allele in the 129 C/T polymorphism of the GCLC gene was independently associated with NASH, whereas at least one G allele in the −493 G/T polymorphism of the MTP gene differed slightly between biopsy-proven NASH and simple steatosis. These two polymorphisms could represent an additional factor for consideration when evaluating the risk of NAFLD progression; however, further studies of larger populations are needed to confirm this notion.57

The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Family Study (IRAS) quantified liver density with computed tomography and confirmed the association between a PNPLA3 variant and NAFLD in Hispanic Americans and African Americans. The rs738409 single-nucleotide polymorphism was strongly associated with reduced liver density in Hispanic Americans and African Americans. This study also suggested that PNPLA3 contributes to the differences in the risk of NAFLD between various ethnic groups.58

Recently, polymorphisms in the T-455C and C-482T APOC3 promoter region have been reported to predispose to dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and NAFLD in Indian subjects. In Caucasian patients with NAFLD, APOC3 genotype is not associated with progressive liver damage, but the association with liver damage in Hispanics has not been evaluated.59

Several studies have been performed to investigate the role of heritability in NAFLD and its complications. In a familial aggregation study, Schwimmer et al. demonstrated that NAFLD is highly heritable. They concluded that hepatic steatosis was significantly more common in siblings (59%) and parents (78%) of children with NAFLD. These data suggest that familial factors are a major determinant of whether an individual develops NAFLD.60 Another study, involving eight members of eight kindreds with two or more patients with NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis found that the presence of NASH with or without cryptogenic cirrhosis within these kindreds suggested a possible genetic risk.61

Chalasani, et al. in a pilot genome-wide association study of liver histology in non-Hispanic white women with NAFLD, analyzed clinical, laboratory, and histologic data. They found significantly associated genetic variants with features of hepatic histology in patients with NAFLD; however these findings should be validated in larger and more diverse cohorts.62

Environmental and lifestyle-related factors

Environmental and lifestyle-related factors such as a low physical activity level and a high-fat diet are associated with NAFLD development and are related to IR. The best predictors of NAFLD may be BMI and waist circumference.63 The former seems to have the strongest independent association with NAFLD. In one study, although waist circumference was a strong predictor of mortality in women, having NAFLD, smoking, and BMI were independent predictors of mortality in men.64

NAFLD is the hepatic manifestation of the MS. In most NAFLD patients, the disease is mainly associated with metabolic risk factors such as obesity (75-95%),4 T2DM and/or IR (70%), and dyslipidemia (50%).19 Up to two-thirds of patients with obesity and T2DM present with hepatic steatosis.65

The central obesity phenotype is associated with increased visceral fat content. The prevalence rates of NAFLD and NASH in the morbidly obese have been estimated to be as high as 91% and 37%, respectively.19,66 Patients with central obesity are characteristically insulin resistant and present more frequently with NAFLD than do patients with lower-body obesity.67

IR and T2DM

IR and oxidative stress play an important role in NAFLD development and progression. The high concentration of insulin may cause failure to suppress fatty acid flux.6870 The prevalence rates of NAFLD and NASH in diabetic patients have been estimated as 60-76% and 22%, respectively.65,71

IR is a major contributor to NAFLD, which is why prevention is important. A cross-sectional study in Chilean adults found that most people diagnosed with IR also had acanthosis nigricans and concluded that acanthosis nigricans may be an early marker of IR in this population.72 T2DM has been shown to be an independent risk factor for chronic liver disease in patients with NAFLD and is an independent risk factor for cirrhosis and HCC. Although most patients with simple fatty liver are not at risk of death, they are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and fatty liver disease doubles the risk of T2DM independently of the severity of liver injury.73

According to data from the International Diabetes Federation, North America and the Caribbean region have the second highest prevalence of diabetes: 10.7% of the adult population affected and an incidence of 1 in 10 adults. Specifically, Puerto Rico, Guyana, and Mexico have the highest prevalence of diabetes in the Americas (Figure 1). The USA has the most people −23.7 million− with diabetes followed by Mexico, Canada, and Haiti.74

Figure 1.

Prevalence of obesity and T2DM in the Americas. Diabetes prevalence data are from reference 74. Obesity prevalence data from references 109-123.

(0.05MB).
The MS

NAFLD is the main hepatic manifestation of the MS, and frequently coexists with obesity, dyslipidemia, and IR. The MS shares common mechanisms with NAFLD development, and both form the pathophysiological basis of IR. The MS is a common complex entity with a high worldwide prevalence that predicts, or is associated with, several diseases such as T2DM, cancer, and NAFLD. About 90% of NAFLD patients have more than one MS component, and one-third have the MS. There is no doubt that NAFLD and the MS are strongly related, but not all people with the MS will develop NAFLD, and vice versa.69,75,76

Yilmaz, et al.77 noted that 20-80% of NAFLD patients have at least one component of the MS.7880 The diagnostic criteria used to define the MS influence the prevalence of both the MS and NAFLD. Thus, the prevalence of the MS in NAFLD cohorts may depend heavily on the definition of the syndrome.81

Studies from the Latin American Group for the Study of Metabolic Syndrome (GLESMO) tested waist circumference as a diagnostic tool for identifying people with visceral adiposity in Hispanics from the Latin American region. The Latin American Diabetes Association suggested the use of the International Diabetes Federation definition with new Latin American criteria. However, for epidemiological studies, it is advisable to also use the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria.82 Although there are insufficient data from all Latin American countries, the available data show that the prevalence of the MS is consistent between countries and depends on the definition used, age ranges, the proportion of men and women included in the studies, and the type of population (urban, rural, aboriginal) (Table 4).82

Table 4.

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Americas.

Country (reference)  Adult population study (n)  Measurements  Overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome 
Canada83  1,800  ATP III criteria  17.70% 
USA84  3,601  IDF/NCEP  39/34.5% 
Texas/USA85  2,815  ATP III/WHO  25/25% 
Mexico86  6,021  ATP III/AHA NHLBI/IDF  36.8/41.6/49.8% 
Mexico87  2,158  ATP III criteria  26.60% 
Costa Rica88  484  ATP III criteria  43% 
Santiago de Cuba89  129  ATP III criteria  Men 63.6%, women 51.4% 
El Salvador90  582  ATP III/IDF  22.68%/30.58% 
Guatemala91  1,063  AHA NHLB  17-28% in men and 45% in women 
Honduras92  246  ATP III criteria  49.60% 
Panama93  389    29% 
San Juan, Puerto Rico94  867  ATP III criteria  43.30% 
San Juan, Puerto Rico95  202  ATP III criteria  31% 
Victoria, Brazil96  1,507  ATP III criteria  25.40% 
Victoria, Brazil97  1,630  ATP III criteria  29.80% 
Virgem das Gracas, Minas Gerais, Brazil98  251  ATP III criteria  21.60% 
Brazil99  240    24.80% 
Talca, Chile100  1,007  ATP III criteria  35.50% 
Bucaramanga, Colombia101  155  ATP III criteria  34.80% 
Arequipa, Peru102  1,878  ATP III criteria  18.80% 
Uruguay103  1,411  ATP III criteria  27.70% 
Zulia, Venezuela104  3,108  ATP III criteria  35.50% 
Jamaica105  839  IDF  1.20% 
Barquisimeto, Venezuela (n = 1,836)*  11,550  ATP III criteria  Barquisimeto: 26% 
Bogota, Colombia (n = 1,550)*      Bogota: 20% 
Buenos Aires, Argentina (n = 1,476)*      Buenos Aires: 17% 
Lima, Peru (n = 1,645)*      Lima: 18% 
Mexico City, Mexico (n = 1720)*      Mexico City: 27% 
Quito, Ecuador (n = 1627)*      Quito: 14% 
Santiago, Chile (n = 1648)106      Santiago: 21% 
*

These data belong to the CARMELA study performed in some Latin American countries according to reference 106.

The general prevalence (weighted mean) of the MS in Latin American countries is 24.9%. The MS occurs slightly more frequently in women (25.3%) than in men (23.2%), and the prevalence is highest in people older than 50 years. The most frequent components of the MS are a low blood high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (62.9%) and abdominal obesity (45.8%).

Although several studies have reported the prevalence of the MS in Latin America, in most studies, the MS was a secondary objective of the study. Thus, the prevalence of this syndrome may not reflect the real prevalence among the general population.

Obesity

The extent of obesity correlates strongly with NAFLD prevalence and severity. Recent data show that the prevalence of obesity in the Americas (23.5% in males and 29.7% in females) is the highest in the world. The Americas have the highest prevalence of obesity in adults aged 20 years or more.107 The trends between 1980 and 2008 indicated a rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity, even in countries with currently low rates.

The prevalence of obesity differs between ethnic groups in the Americas. For example, non-Hispanic Afro-Americans have the highest age-adjusted rates of obesity (49.5%) compared with Mexican Americans (40.4%), Hispanics (39.1%), and non-Hispanic whites (34.3%).108

The Pan American Health Organization reports that in Argentina, Colombia, Peru, Paraguay, and Uruguay, more than 15% of the entire population is obese. National comparative studies have found that the prevalence of obesity in the adult population is > 20% in 17 of 20 Latin American countries.21 In all South American countries except for Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Bolivia, > 50% of the population is overweight.21 In Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, and Peru, 11-15% of the adolescent population is obese. In this age group, obesity is more prevalent in urban areas and in areas with low socioeconomic status. A summary of the data on the prevalence of obesity in America (Figure 1) shows that the USA, Mexico, Barbados, and Belize have the highest prevalence of obesity. Using the available data, several projections have estimated that by 2030, there will be 65 million more obese adults in the USA.109

Prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas estimated from obesity rates

The largest increases in the prevalence of the MS have occurred in the USA, Mexico, Costa Rica, Puerto Rico, Chile, and Venezuela. Using information from the Cardiovascular Risk Factor Multiple Evaluation in Latin America (CARMELA)106 study, we confirmed that Chile, Mexico, and Venezuela are countries with a high prevalence of MS in Latin America.

Despite the relative lack of studies on the epidemiology of NAFLD in emerging regions such as Latin America, we believe that the prevalence of obesity-associated diseases such as NAFLD in the Americas can be estimated from the prevalence rates of obesity. Assuming that about 80% of obese patients might develop NAFLD, we predicted the prevalence for different countries, as shown in figure 2 and discussed below.

Figure 2.

Correlation between the prevalence of Obesity and NAFLD in the Americas. The graph was built with data from the prevalence of obesity for each country; NAFLD prevalence was estimated assuming that about 80% of obese patients might develop NAFLD4 in the Americas Countries.

(0.03MB).

Based on the prevalence of obesity, the prevalence rates of NAFLD are estimated as 26% in Mexico, 29% in the USA, 15-20% in Central America, and 28% in Belize and Barbados, which have high obesity prevalence. In South America, the prevalence of NAFLD have been estimated as 24% in Venezuela and Chile, 20% in Uruguay, 18% in Guyana, Paraguay, and Ecuador, and ≤ 16% in the other countries.

In summary, we found that the prevalence of obesity and NAFLD in the Americas are highest in the USA, Belize, Barbados, and Mexico.

Knowing the prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas will help establish appropriate preventive measures because the early recognition and treatment of this disease are critical given its important role in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease.

The management of risk factors is extremely important for limiting the burden of NAFLD. The present review brings us closer to an understanding of the prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas. However, it is not possible to know the full scope of the problem, partly because data from some countries are not available and because methodological differences between studies limit a combined analysis of their results.

Conclusion

The prevalence of NAFLD in the Americas is highest in the USA, Belize, Barbados, and Mexico. the increasing prevalence of NAFLD in American countries is likely to be linked to an increased prevalence in obesity; this will present a challenge in the coming years in terms of public health costs. Efficient and well-planned preventive strategies based on lifestyle modification and nutritional interventions focused mainly on the pediatric population should be implemented to reduce the disease burden. This would likely reduce the impact on health-service costs related to chronic liver disease in these nations.

Abbreviations

  • 1H MRS: proton magnetic spectroscopy.

  • BMI: body mass index.

  • CARMELA: Cardiovascular Risk Factor Multiple Evaluation in Latin America.

  • HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma.

  • IR: insulin resistance.

  • MS: metabolic syndrome.

  • MTP: microsomal triglyceride transfer protein.

  • NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

  • NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

  • PNPLA3: patatin-like phospholipase domaincontaining 3 gene.

  • T2DM: diabetes mellitus.

  • US: ultrasound.

  • USA: United States of America.

References
[1.]
Chalasani N., Younossi Z., Lavine J.E., Diehl A.M., Brunt E.M., Cusi K., Charlton M., et al.
The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association.
Am J Gastroenterol, 55 (2012), pp. 2005-2023
[2.]
de Alwis N.M., Day C.P..
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the mist gradually clears.
J Hepatol, 48 (2008), pp. 104-112
[3.]
Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id = 3501&Itemid=2391 (Interactive visualization of leading causes of deaths, Region of the Americas 2009-2010, working age population 40-65 years).
[4.]
Angulo P..
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
N Engl J Med, 346 (2002), pp. 1221-1231
[5.]
Méndez-Sánchez N., Arrese M., Zamora Valdés D., Uribe M..
Current concepts in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
[6.]
Sanyal A.J., Banas C., Sargeant C., Luketic V.A., Sterling R.K., Stravitz R.T., Shiffman M.L., et al.
Similarities and differences in outcomes of cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C.
Hepatology, 43 (2006), pp. 682-689
[7.]
Ascha M.S., Hanouneh I.A., Lopez R., Tamimi T.A., Feldstein A.F., Zein N.N..
The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Hepatology, 51 (2010), pp. 1972-1978
[8.]
Wieckowska A., Feldstein A.E..
Diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: invasive versus noninvasive.
Semin Liver Dis, 28 (2008), pp. 386-395
[9.]
Obika M., Noguchi H..
Diagnosis and evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Exp Diabetes Res, 2012 (2012), pp. 145754
[10.]
Browning J.D., Szczepaniak L.S., Dobbins R., Nuremberg P., Horton J.D., Cohen J.C., Grundy S.M., et al.
Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity.
Hepatology, 40 (2004), pp. 1387-1395
[11.]
Ryan C.K., Johnson L.A., Germin B.I., Marcos A..
One hundred consecutive hepatic biopsies in the workup of living donors for right lobe liver transplantation.
Liver Transpl, 8 (2002), pp. 1114-1122
[12.]
Roldan-Valadez E., Favila R., Martínez-López M., Uribe M., Ríos C., Méndez- Sánchez N..
In vivo 3T spectroscopic quantification of liver fat content in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: correlation with biochemical method and morphometry.
J Hepatol, 53 (2010), pp. 732-737
[13.]
Fishbein M., Castro F., Cheruku S., Jain S., Webb B., Gleason T., Stevens W.R..
Hepatic MRI for fat quantitation: its relationship to fat morphology, diagnosis, and ultrasound.
J Clin Gastroenterol, 39 (2005), pp. 619-625
[14.]
Feldstein A.E., Wieckowska A., Lopez A.R., Liu Y.C., Zein N.N., McCullough A.J..
Cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicenter validation study.
Hepatology, 50 (2009), pp. 1072-1078
[15.]
Milner K.L., van der Poorten D., Xu A., Bugianesi E., Kench J.G., Lam K.S., Chisholm D.J., et al.
Adipocyte fatty acid binding protein levels relate to inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology, 49 (2009), pp. 1926-1934
[16.]
Li H., Fang Q., Gao F., Fan J., Zhou J., Wang X., Zhang H., et al.
Fibroblast growth factor 21 levels are increased in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients and are correlated with hepatic triglyceride.
J Hepatol, 53 (2010), pp. 934-940
[17.]
Ruhl C.E., Everhart J.E..
Determinants of the association of overweight with elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activity in the United States.
Gastroenterology, 124 (2003), pp. 71-79
[18.]
Vernon G., Baranova A., Younossi Z.M..
Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 34 (2011), pp. 274-285
[19.]
Williams C.D., Stengel J., Asike M.I., Torres D.M., Shaw J., Contreras M., Landt C.L., et al.
Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study.
Gastroenterology, 140 (2011), pp. 124-131
[20.]
Bellentani S., Scaglioni F., Marino M., Bedogni G..
Epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Dig Dis, 28 (2010), pp. 155-161
[21.]
Aballay L.R., Eynard A.R., Díaz Mdel P., Navarro A., Muñoz S.E..
Overweight and obesity: a review of their relationship to metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in South America.
[22.]
Aballay L.R., Osella A.R., Celi A., Díaz M..
Overweight and obesity: prevalence and their association with some social characteristics in a random sample population- based study in Córdoba city, Argentina.
Obes Res Clin Pract, 3 (2009), pp. 75-83
[23.]
World Health Organization. The Global Health Observatory 2012. Available at: http://www.who.int/gho/en/ index.html
[24.]
Cuevas A., Alvarez V., Olivos C..
The emerging obesity problem in Latin America.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 7 (2009), pp. 281-288
[25.]
Rivera J.A., Barquera S., González-Cossío T., Olaiz G., Sepúlveda J..
Nutrition transition in Mexico and in other Latin American countries.
Nutr Rev, 62 (2004), pp. 149-157
[26.]
Pan American Health Organization; Health in the Americas 2012. Available at: http://new.paho.org/saludenlasamericas.
[27.]
Ratziu V., Bellentani S., Cortez-Pinto H., Day C., Marchesini G..
A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference.
J Hepatol, 53 (2010), pp. 372-384
[28.]
Das K., Das K., Mukherjee P.S., Ghosh A., Ghosh S., Mridha A.R., Dhibar T., et al.
Nonobese population in a developing country has a high prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver and significant liver disease.
Hepatology, 51 (2010), pp. 1593-1602
[29.]
Carrillo-Iregui A., Lopez-Mitnik G., Cossio S., Garibay-Nieto N., Arheart K.L., Messiah S.E..
Relationship between aminotransferases levels and components of the metabolic syndrome among multiethnic adolescents.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab, 23 (2010), pp. 1253-1261
[30.]
Clark J.M., Brancati F.L., Diehl A.M..
The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States.
Am J Gastroenterol, 98 (2003), pp. 960-967
[31.]
Skelly M.M., James P.D., Ryder S.D..
Findings on liver biopsy to investigate abnormal liver function tests in the absence of diagnostic serology.
J Hepatol, 35 (2001), pp. 195-199
[32.]
Lynne E..
Correlates and heritability of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a minority cohort.
Obesity (Silver Spring), 7 (2009), pp. 1240-1246
[33.]
Cotrim H.P., Parise E., Oliveira, Leite N., Martinelli A., Galizzi J., De Cassia R., et al.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Brazil: clinical and histological profile.
Ann Hepatol, 10 (2011), pp. 33-37
[34.]
Perez M., Gonzáles L., Olarte R., Rodríguez N.I., Tabares M., Salazar J.P., Jaimes S., et al.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with insulin resistance in a young Hispanic population.
Prev Med, 52 (2011), pp. 174-177
[35.]
Lizardi-Cervera J., Laparra D.I., Chavez-Tapia N.C., Ostos M.E., Esquivel M.U..
Prevalence of NAFLD and metabolic syndrome in asymptomatic subjects.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 71 (2006), pp. 453-459
[36.]
Riquelme A., Arrese M., Soza A., Morales A., Baudrand R., Pérez-Ayuso R.M., González R., et al.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with obesity, insulin resistance and increased serum levels of C-reactive protein in Hispanics.
[37.]
Lazo M., Hernaez R., Eberhardt M.S., Bonekamp S., Kamel I., Guallar E., Koteish A., et al.
Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.
Am J Epidemiol, 178 (2013), pp. 38-45
[38.]
Minervini M.I., Ruppert K., Fontes P., Volpes R., Vizzini G., de Vera M.E., Gruttadauria S., et al.
Liver biopsy findings from healthy potential living liver donors: reasons for disqualification, silent diseases and correlation with liver injury tests.
J Hepatol, 50 (2009), pp. 501-510
[39.]
Karnikowski M., Córdova C., Oliveira R.J., Karnikowski M.G., Nóbrega Ode T..
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome in Brazilian middle-aged and older adults.
Sao Paulo Med J, 125 (2007), pp. 333-337
[40.]
Matteoni L., Boente L., Soares D., Leal R., Campos F., Araújo César, D’Almeida F., et al.
Nonalcoholic fatty hepatic disease: relevance of the diagnosis on abdominal ultrasound.
Gazeta Médica da Bahia, 81 (2011), pp. 7-9
[41.]
Parise E.R., Salgado A.L., Secaf R., Cerri L., Cerri G..
Prevalence of liver steatosis in abdominal ultrasound.
GED, 22 (2003), pp. 235-237
[42.]
Rocha R., Cotrim H.P., Bitencourt A.G., Barbosa D.B., Santos A.S., Almeida Ade M., Cunha B., et al.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in asymptomatic Brazilian adolescents.
World J Gastroenterol, 15 (2009), pp. 473-477
[43.]
Liangpunsakul S., Chalasani N..
Unexplained elevations in alanine aminotransferase in individuals with the metabolic syndrome: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III).
Am J Med Sci, 329 (2005), pp. 111-116
[44.]
Weston S.R., Leyden W., Murphy R., Bass N.M., Bell B.P., Manos M.M., Terrault N.A..
Racial and ethnic distribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver in persons with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease.
Hepatology, 41 (2005), pp. 372-379
[45.]
Gambarin-Gelwan M., Kinkhabwala S.V., Schiano T.D., Bodian C., Yeh H.C., Futterweit W..
Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5 (2007), pp. 496-501
[46.]
Kunde S.S., Lazenby A.J., Clements R.H., Abrams G.A..
Spectrum of NAFLD and diagnostic implications of the proposed new normal range for serum ALT in obese women.
Hepatology, 42 (2005), pp. 650-656
[47.]
Roesch-Dietlen F., Dorantes-Cuéllar A., Carrillo-Toledo M.G., Martínez-Sibaja C., Rojas-Carrera S., Bonilla-Rojas Q.C., Uchino-Higueras V., et al.
Frequency of NAFLD in a group of patients with metabolic syndrome in Veracruz, Mexico.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 71 (2006), pp. 446-452
[48.]
Castro-Martínez M.G., Banderas-Lares D.Z., Ramírez-Martínez J.C., Escobedo-de la Peña J..
Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in subjects with metabolic syndrome.
Cir Cir, 80 (2012), pp. 128-133
[49.]
Gutierrez-Grobe Y., Ponciano-Rodríguez G., Ramos M.H., Uribe M., Méndez-Sánchez N..
Prevalence of non alcoholic fatty liver disease in premenopausal, postmenopausal and polycystic ovary syndrome women. The role of estrogens.
Ann Hepatol, 9 (2010), pp. 402-409
[50.]
de Oliveira C.P., de Mello E.S., Alves V.A., Saviero S.M., Strauss E..
Changes in histological criteria lead to different prevalences of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in severe obesity.
Ann Hepatol, 6 (2007), pp. 255-261
[51.]
Lima M.L., Mourao S.C., Diniz M.T., Leite V.H..
Hepatic histopathology of patients with morbid obesity submitted to gastric bypass.
Obes Surg, 15 (2005), pp. 661-669
[52.]
Leite N.C., Villela-Nogueira C.A., Pannain V.L., Bottino A.C., Rezende G.F., Cardoso C.R., Salles G.F..
Histopathological stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: prevalences and correlated factors.
Liver Int, 3 (2011), pp. 700-706
[53.]
Boza C., Riquelme A., Ibañez L., Duarte I., Norero E., Viviani P., Soza A., et al.
Predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass.
Obes Surg, 15 (2005), pp. 1148-1153
[54.]
Petersen K.F., Dufour S., Feng J., Befroy D., Dziura J., Dalla Man C., Cobelli C., et al.
Increased prevalence of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Asian-Indian men.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103 (2006), pp. 18273-18277
[55.]
Caldwell S.H., Harris D.M., Patrie J.T., Hespenheide E.E..
Is NASH underdiagnosed among African Americans?.
Am J Gastroenterol, 97 (2002), pp. 1496-1500
[56.]
Bambha K., Belt P., Abraham M., Wilson L.A., Pabst M., Ferrell L., Unalp-Arida A., et al.
Ethnicity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology, 55 (2012), pp. 769-780
[57.]
Daly A.K., Ballestri S., Carulli L., Loria P., Day C.P..
Genetic determinants of susceptibility and severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5 (2011), pp. 253-263
[58.]
Sookoian S., Pirola C.J..
Meta-analysis of the influence of I148M variant of patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 genes (PNPLA3) on the susceptibility and histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology, 53 (2011), pp. 1883-1894
[59.]
Valenti L., Nobili V., Al-Serri A., Rametta R., Leathart J.B., Zappa M.A., et al.
The APOC3 T-455C and C-482T promoter region polymorphisms are not associated with the severity of liver damage independently of PNPLA3 I148M genotype in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver.
J Hepatol, 55 (2011), pp. 1409-1414
[60.]
Schwimmer J.B., Celedon M.A., Lavine J.E., Salem R., Campbell N., Schork N.J., Shiehmorteza M., et al.
Heritability of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Gastroenterology, 136 (2009), pp. 1585-1592
[61.]
Struben V.M., Hespenheide E.E., Caldwell S.H..
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis within kindreds.
Am J Med, 108 (2000), pp. 9-13
[62.]
Chalasani N., Guo X., Loomba R., Goodarzi M.O., Haritunians T., Kwon S., et al.
Genome-wide association study identifies variants associated with histologic features of nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease.
Gastroenterology, 139 (2010), pp. 1567-1576
[63.]
Otgonsuren M., Stepanova M., Gerber L., Younossi Z.M..
Anthropometric and clinical factors associated with mortality in subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Dig Dis Sci, 58 (2013), pp. 1132-1140
[64.]
Bellentani S., Saccoccio G., Masutti F., Crocè L.S., Brandi G., Sasso F., Cristanini G., Tiribelli C..
Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatic steatosis in Northern Italy.
Ann Intern Med, 132 (2000), pp. 112-117
[65.]
Targher G., Bertolini L., Padovani R., Rodella S., Tessari R., Zenari L., Day C., et al.
Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes Care, 30 (2007), pp. 1212-1218
[66.]
Machado M., Cortez-Pinto H..
NASH, insulin resistance and iron.
Liver Int, 26 (2006), pp. 1159-1162
[67.]
Stranges S., Dorn J.M., Muti P., Freudenheim J.L., Farinaro E., Russell M., Nochajski T.H., et al.
Body fat distribution, relative weight, and liver enzyme levels: a population-based study.
Hepatology, 39 (2004), pp. 754-763
[68.]
Samuel V.T., Liu Z.X., Qu X., Elder B.D., Bilz S., Befroy D., Romanelli A.J., et al.
Mechanism of hepatic insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
J Biol Chem, 279 (2004), pp. 32345-32353
[69.]
Green R.M..
NASH-hepatic metabolism and not simply the metabolic syndrome.
Hepatology, 38 (2003), pp. 14-17
[70.]
Sanyal A.J., Campbell-Sargent C., Mirshahi F., Rizzo W.B., Contos M.J., Sterling R.K., Luketic V.A..
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association of insulin resistance and mitochondrial abnormalities.
Gastroenterology, 120 (2001), pp. 1183-1192
[71.]
Beymer C., Kowdley K.V., Larson A., Edmonson P., Dellinger E.P., Flum D.R..
Prevalence and predictors of asymptomatic liver disease in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery.
Arch Surg, 138 (2003), pp. 1240-1244
[72.]
Pinheiro A.C., Rojas P., Carrasco F., Gómez P., Mayas N., Morales I..
Acanthosis nigricans as an indicator of insulin resistance in Chilean adult population.
[73.]
Musso G., Gambino R., Cassader M., Pagano G..
Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests for liver disease severity.
[74.]
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 5th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2011. Available at: http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas
[75.]
Chitturi S., Farrell G.C..
Etiopathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Semin Liver Dis, 21 (2001), pp. 27-41
[76.]
Vanni E., Bugianesi E., Kotronen A., De Minicis S., Yki-Järvinen H., Svegliati-Baroni G..
From the metabolic syndrome to NAFLD or vice versa?.
Dig Liver Dis, 42 (2010), pp. 320-330
[77.]
Yilmaz Y..
NAFLD in the absence of metabolic syndrome: different epidemiology, pathogenetic mechanisms, risk factors for disease progression?.
Semin Liver Dis, 32 (2012), pp. 14-21
[78.]
Grundy S.M., Cleeman J.I., Daniels S.R., Donato K.A., Eckel R.H., Franklin B.A., et al.
Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement.
Circulation, 112 (2005), pp. 2735-2752
[79.]
Einhorn D., Reaven G.M., Cobin R.H., Ford E., Ganda O.P., Handelsman Y., Hellman R., et al.
American College of Endocrinology position statement on the insulin resistance syndrome.
Endocr Pract, 9 (2003), pp. 237-252
[80.]
Alberti K.G., Zimmet P., Shaw J..
IDF. The metabolic syndrome-a new worldwide definition.
Lancet, 366 (2005), pp. 1059-1062
[81.]
Tillin T., Forouhi N., Johnston D.G., McKeigue P.M., Chaturvedi N., Godsland I.F..
Metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease in South Asians, African-Caribbeans and white Europeans: a UK population-based cross-sectional study.
Diabetología, 48 (2005), pp. 649-656
[82.]
Aschner P., Buendía R., Brajkovich I., Gonzalez A., Figueredo R., Juarez X.E., Uriza F., et al.
Determination of the cutoff point for waist circumference that establishes the presence of abdominal obesity in Latin American men and women.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 93 (2011), pp. 243-247
[83.]
Riediger N., Clara I..
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Canadian adult population.
CMAJ, 183 (2011), pp. E1127-E1134
[84.]
Ford E.S..
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the US.
Diabetes Care, 28 (2005), pp. 2745-2749
[85.]
Hunt K.J., Resendez R.G., Williams K., Haffner S.M., Stern M.P..
National Cholesterol Education Program versus Would Health Organization in relation to all cause and cardiovascular mortality in the San Antonio Heart Study.
Circulation, 110 (2004), pp. 1251-1257
[86.]
Rojas R., Aguilar-Salinas C.A., Jiménez-Corona A., Shamah-Levy T., Rauda J., Avila-Burgos L., Villalpando S., et al.
Metabolic syndrome in Mexican adults. Results from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006.
Salud Pub Mex, 52 (2010), pp. 11-18
[87.]
Aguilar-Salinas C.A., Rojas R., Gómez-Pérez F.J., Valles V., Ríos-Torres J.M., Franco A., Olaiz G., et al.
High prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Mexico.
Arch Med Res, 35 (2004), pp. 76-81
[88.]
Williams E.S., Baylin A., Campos H..
Adipose tissue arachidonic acid and the metabolic syndrome in Costa Rican adults.
Clin Nutr, 26 (2007), pp. 474-482
[89.]
Araujo Y., Roque C., Escobar E., Abraham E..
Caracterización del síndrome metabólico en pacientes de la provincial de Santiago de Cuba, año 2010.
Rev Latinoamer Patol Clin, 60 (2013), pp. 10-96
[90.]
Juarez X., Benitez J., Quezada R., Cerritos R., Aguilar R..
Prevalencia del síndrome metabólico en la población urbana de San Salvador.
Asociación latinoamericana de diabetes, 19 (2006), pp. 25-30
[91.]
Gregory C.O., Dai J., Ramirez-Zea M., Stein A.D..
Occupation is more important than rural or urban residence in explaining the prevalence of metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk in Guatemalan adults.
J Nutr, 137 (2007), pp. 1314-1319
[92.]
Hall J., Alvarenga M., Gómez O..
Prevalence of hypertension in adults in El Progreso, Yoro, Honduras.
Rev Med Hondur, 73 (2005), pp. 60-64
[93.]
DeBoer M.D., Chen D., Burt D.R., Ramirez-Zea M., Guerrant R.L., Stein A.D., Martorell R., et al.
Early childhood diarrhea and cardiometabolic risk factors in adulthood: the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama Nutritional Supplementation Longitudinal Study.
Ann Epidemiol, 23 (2013), pp. 314-320
[94.]
Pérez C.M., Guzmán M., Ortiz A.P., Estrella M., Valle Y., Pérez N., Haddock L., et al.
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Ethn Dis, 18 (2008), pp. 434-441
[95.]
Gomez M., Ramirez M., Disdier O..
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among a determined Puerto Rican population.
P R Health Sci J, 25 (2006), pp. 111-116
[96.]
Marquezine G.F., Oliveira C.M., Pereira A.C., Krieger J.E., Mill J.G..
Metabolic syndrome determinants in an urban population from Brazil: social class and gender-specific interaction.
Int J Cardiol, 129 (2008), pp. 259-265
[97.]
Salaroli L.B., Barbosa G.C., Mill J.G., Molina M.C..
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in population-based study, Vitoria, ES-Brazil.
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol, 51 (2007), pp. 1143-1152
[98.]
Velásquez-Meléndez G., Gazzinelli A., Côrrea-Oliveira R., Pimenta A.M., Kac G..
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a rural area of Brazil.
Sao Paulo Med J, 125 (2007), pp. 155-162
[99.]
de Oliveira E.P., de Souza M.L., de Lima M.D..
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a semi-arid rural area in Bahia.
Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol, 50 (2006), pp. 456-465
[100.]
Mujica V., Leiva E., Icaza G., Diaz N., Arredondo M., Moore-Carrasco R., Orrego R., et al.
Evaluation of metabolic syndrome in adults of Talca city, Chile.
[101.]
Pinzón J.B., Serrano N.C., Díaz L.A., Mantilla G., Velasco H.M., Martínez L.X., Millán P.A., et al.
Impact of the new definitions in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in an adult population at Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Biomedica, 27 (2007), pp. 172-179
[102.]
Medina-Lezama J., Zea-Diaz H., Morey-Vargas O.L., Bolaños-Salazar J.F., Muñoz-Atahualpa E., Postigo-MacDowall M., Corrales-Medina F..
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Peruvian Andean Hispanics: the PREVENCION study.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 78 (2007), pp. 270-281
[103.]
Schettini C., Schwedt E., Moreira V., Mogdasy C., Chávez L., Bianchi M., et al.
Prevalencia del síndrome metabólico en una población adulta.
Rev Urug Cardiol, 19 (2004), pp. 19-28
[104.]
Florez H., Silva E., Fernández V., Ryder E., Sulbarán T., Campos G., Calmón G., et al.
Prevalence and risk factors associated with the metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia in white, black, Amerindian and mixed Hispanics in Zulia State, Venezuela.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 69 (2005), pp. 63-77
[105.]
Ferguson T., Tulloch-Reid M., Younger N., Knight-Madden J., Samms-Vaughan M., Ashley D., Broeck J., et al.
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its components in relation to socioeconomic status among Jamaican young adults: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Public Health, 10 (2010), pp. 307
[106.]
Escobedo J., Schargrodsky H., Champagne B., Silva H., Boissonnet C.P., Vinueza R., Torres M., et al.
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Latin America and its association with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis: the CARMELA cross-sectional study.
Cardiovasc Diabetol, 8 (2009), pp. 52
[107.]
World Health Organization. World health statistics 2013. Available at: htttp://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/ 81965/1/9789241564588_eng.pdf
[108.]
Flegal K.M., Carroll M.D., Kit B.K., Ogden C.L..
Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010.
JAMA, 307 (2012), pp. 491-497
[109.]
Wang Y.C., McPherson K., Marsh T., Gortmaker S.L., Brown M..
Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK.
[110.]
Gotay C.C., Katzmarzyk P.T., Janssen I., Dawson M.Y., Aminoltejari K., Bartley N.L..
Updating the Canadian obesity maps: an epidemic in progress.
Can J Public Health, 104 (2012), pp. 64-68
[111.]
Ogden C.L., Carroll M.D., Kit B.K., Flegal K.M..
Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011-2012.
NCHS Data Brief, 131 (2013), pp. 1-8
[112.]
ENSANUT 2012. Available at: http://ensanut.insp.mx/informes/ENSANUT2012ResultadosNacionales.pdf
[113.]
Health in the Americas 2012. Available at: http:// www.paho.org/saludenlasamericas/index.php? option = com_content&view=article&id = 9&Itemid = 14& lang=en
[114.]
Brathwaite N., Brathwaite A., Taylor M..
The socio-economic determinants of obesity in adults in the Bahamas.
West Indian Med J, 60 (2011), pp. 434-441
[115.]
World Health Organization, NCD Country Profiles 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ ncd_profiles_report.pdf
[116.]
Panamerican Health Organization. Encuesta de Diabetes, hipertensión y factores de riesgo de enfermedades crónicas, San José, Costa Rica 2009. Available at: http:// www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task =doc_view&gid = 16262&Itemid =
[117.]
Morejóng A., Rodríuez M., Díez E., García D., Salas V., Ordúñez P..
Metabolic syndrome in a health area of Cienfuegos. CARMEN Second Measurement.
Finlay, 1 (2011), pp. 6-14
[118.]
Estudio Factores de Riesgo Cardiovascular y Síndrome Metabólico (Efricard II). Available at: http:// saludfunglode.org/documentos/efricard-2.pdf
[119.]
Cardone A., Borracci R., Milin E..
Estimación a largo plazo de la prevalencia de obesidad en la Argentina.
Rev Argent Cardiol, 78 (2010), pp. 23-29
[120.]
Navía O., Caballero D., Flores J., Gutiérrez V., Ramírez W..
Prevalencia de factores de riesgo asociado a diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en población mayor de 20 años en los servicios de salud de II y III nivel del área urbana y rural en Bolivia. 2007.
Cuad Hosp Clin, 52 (2007), pp. 53-58
[121.]
Ministerio de Salud Chile. Resultados de la Encuesta nacional de enfermedades. 2009-2010. MINSAL 2010. Available at: http://epi.minsal.cl/wp-content/uploads/2012/ 07/InformeENS_2009-2010_CAP1.pdf
[122.]
Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional en Colombia 2010 (ENSIN). Available at: http://www.icbf.gov.co/portal/page/portal/Descargas1/Resumenfi.pdf
[123.]
Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social (MSP y BS). Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS-OMS). Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional y Desarrollo (AECID). Primera Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo No Transmisibles. Paraguay, 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/ chp/steps/2011_STEPS_Paraguay_ leaflet.pdf
Copyright © 2014. Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C.
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos