covid
Buscar en
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
Toda la web
Inicio Brazilian Journal of Microbiology Susceptibility and molecular characterization of Candida species from patients w...
Información de la revista
Vol. 47. Núm. 2.
Páginas 373-380 (abril - junio 2016)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
2160
Vol. 47. Núm. 2.
Páginas 373-380 (abril - junio 2016)
Medical Microbiology
Open Access
Susceptibility and molecular characterization of Candida species from patients with vulvovaginitis
Visitas
2160
Gheniffer Fornaria, Vania Aparecida Vicentea, Renata Rodrigues Gomesa, Marisol Dominguez Murob, Rosangela Lameira Pinheirob, Carolina Ferraric, Patricia Fernanda Herkerta, Marcos Takimurac, Newton Sérgio de Carvalhoc, Flavio Queiroz-Tellesa,b,
Autor para correspondencia
Queiroz.telles@uol.com.br

Corresponding author.
a Graduate Program in Microbiology, Parasitology and Pathology, Department of Basic Pathology, Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology-LabMicro, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
b Support and Diagnosis Unit, Mycology Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil
c Clinical Hospital Federal University of Paraná, Brazil
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (2)
Table 1. List of reference strains and the clinical isolates.
Table 2. Variations in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antifungals for the different study groups.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis affects women of reproductive age, which represents approximately 15–25% of vaginitis cases. The present study aimed to isolate and characterize yeast from the patients irrespective of the presentation of clinical symptoms. The isolates were subjected to in vitro susceptibility profile and characterization by molecular markers, which intended to assess the distribution of species. A total of 40 isolates were obtained and identified through the CHROMagar, API20aux and by ITS and D1/D2 regions sequencing of DNAr gene. Candida albicans strains were genotyped by the ABC system and the isolates were divided into two genotypic groups. The identity of the C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr and Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates was confirmed by the multilocus analysis. The strains of Candida, isolated from patients with complications, were found to be resistant to nystatin but sensitive to fluconazole, amphotericin B and ketoconazole, as observed by in vitro sensitivity profile. The isolates from asymptomatic patients, i.e., the colonized group, showed a dose-dependent sensitivity to the anti-fungal agents, fluconazole and amphotericin B. However, the isolates of C. albicans that belong to distinct genotypic groups showed the same in vitro susceptibility profile.

Keywords:
Vulvovaginal candidiasis
In vitro susceptibility
Variability genetic
Texto completo
Introduction

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a primary opportunistic mycosis or secondary with endogenous or exogenous characteristics. It is also classified as a sexually transmitted disease (STD) and is caused by different species of Candida.1,2 The disease is characterized by inflammation of the genital mucosa as a response to the yeast proliferation.3

The genus Candida includes approximately 300 heterogeneous species with different morphological and functional features, and is currently found as a part of the normal flora in skin, digestive tract and mucous membrane, including the human genito-urinary tract.4 Predominantly, VVC is caused by C. albicans and its prevalence can reach 85–95%.1 However, infections caused by other species such as C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. kefyr and C. lusitaniae have been reported as well.1,4,5 According to literature these species are part of the vaginal mucous microbiota and they are present in 20–80% of healthy adult population, with clinical manifestations in 10% of pre-menopausal patients, 5–10% in menopausal and 30% of pregnant women.6,7

Vulvovaginal infection, caused by Candida spp., affects women of reproductive age representing approximately 15–25% of the vaginitis cases.8 These microorganisms usually remain hosted in the vaginal mucous only as colonizers; however, under inappropriate conditions the yeast reproduction increases inducing expression of virulence factors, which subsequently affects the mucous membrane, characteristic of the symptomatic VVC.9

Identification of strains that are isolated from VVC is crucial to clarify the distribution of C. albicans in relation to other species of Candida genus in different populations with manifestations of the infection. In clinical practice, the yeast identification is based on morphological and biochemical markers, including the automated methods.10,11 However, not all the species are precisely identified by such procedures. Therefore, molecular markers based on the sequencing of variable domain (D1/D2) from the 26S region and internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of the RNA gene were utilized in the present study to enable identification and detection of various strains.12

VVC is not a notified disease and generally the drug treatment is recommended based on the clinical diagnosis. Epidemiological molecular studies are relevant in context of establishment of species prevalence, elucidation of virulence factors and mechanisms of drug resistance so as to support the treatment protocols.13

A few studies have focused on the correlation of antifungal susceptibility with clinical results in VVC.14 In spite of a considerable enhancement in the resistance profile among the various Candida species, fluconazole is still widely used for treatment of VVC.1 Since it has been noticed that C. albicans displays a variable sensitivity to azoles derivatives, it seems crucial to identify its sensitivity profile against various drugs for a better therapeutic conduct.15

In view of such grounds, the current work aimed to evaluate in vitro susceptibility and molecular characterization of yeast from genus Candida that were isolated from the patients with infection and the patients with no clinical symptoms, for elucidation of epidemiological aspects of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Materials and methodsTest organism

The present study analyzed vaginal material isolates from the patients assisted by an outpatient clinic of Toco-gynecology at the Clinical Hospital/UFPR, Paraná (Table 1). The study was conducted from November 2011 to October 2012. The research work was approved by the Ethical Committee of Federal University of Paraná Clinical. Samples from 133 women were collected with their consent.

Table 1.

List of reference strains and the clinical isolates.

Name  Number of reference  Substrate  Geographical indication  GenBank access
        ITS  D1/D1 
Candida albicans  CBS 562  Clinical isolate  Australia  EF567995  U45776 
Candida dubliniensis  CBS 7987  Clinical isolate  Japan  AB035589  U57685 
Candida inconspícua  CBS 180  Clinical isolate  Australia  AJ853766  U71062 
Candida intermedia  CBS 572  Clinical isolate  Australia  EF568011  U44809 
Candida glabrata  CBS 138  –  Ireland  AY198398  U44808 
Candida haemulonii  CBS 5149  –  Spain  JX459660  U44812 
Candida tropicalis  CBS 94  Clinical isolate  Japan  AB437068  U45749 
Clavispora lusitaniae  CBS 6986  Urine  Bulgaria  EF568049  U44817 
Debaryomyces carsonii  CBS 2285  Clinical isolate  USA  AJ853767  U45743 
Kluyveromyces marxianus  CBS 712  Clinical isolate  Australia  EF568057  U94924 
Kluyveromyces lactis  CECT1961  Environmental  USA  AJ401704  U94922 
Meyerozyma guilliermondii  CBS 2030  Clinical isolate  Australia  EF568003  U45709 
Pichia fermentans  L1B  Environmental isolates  UK  FJ713081  U75726 
Pichia membranifaciens  23  –  Spain  JQ410476  AJ508586 
Pichia segobiensis  CECT 10-210  –  Spain  DQ409166  U45742 
Torulaspora delbrueckii  CBS 1146  Clinical isolate  Australia  EF568083  AJ508558 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae  NRRL Y-12632  –  USA  AM900404  AY048154 
Schizosaccharomyces pombe  NRRL Y-12796  –  USA  AY251633  U40085 
Candida glabrata  HC01  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651873  KJ624025 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae  HC02  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  –  KJ624026 
Candida albicans  HC03  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651903  KJ624027 
Candida albicans  HC04  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651904  KJ624028 
Candida albicans  HC05  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651905  KJ624029 
Candida albicans  HC06  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651906  KJ624030 
Candida glabrata  HC07  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651907  KJ624031 
Candida guilliermondii  HC08  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651908  KJ624032 
Candida kefyr  HC09  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651909  KJ624033 
Candida glabrata  HC10  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651910  KJ624034 
Candida albicans  HC11  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651874  KJ624035 
Candida albicans  HC12  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651875  KJ624036 
Candida albicans  HC13  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  –  KJ624037 
Candida albicans  HC14  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651876  KJ624038 
Candida albicans  HC15  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651877  KJ624039 
Candida albicans  HC16  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651878  KJ624040 
Candida albicans  HC17  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651879  KJ624041 
Candida albicans  HC18  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651880  KJ624042 
Candida albicans  HC19  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651881  KJ624043 
Candida albicans  HC20  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651882  KJ624044 
Candida albicans  HC01IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651883  KJ624045 
Candida albicans  HC02IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651884  KJ624046 
Candida dubliniensis  HC03IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651885  KJ624047 
Candida albicans  HC04IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651886  KJ624048 
Candida albicans  HC05IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651887  KJ624049 
Candida albicans  HC06IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651888  KJ624050 
Candida albicans  HC07IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651889  KJ624051 
Candida albicans  HC08IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651890  KJ624052 
Candida albicans  HC09IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651891  KJ624053 
Candida albicans  HC10IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651892  KJ624054 
Candida albicans  HC11IC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651893  KJ624055 
Candida albicans  HC01INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651894  KJ624056 
Candida albicans  HC02INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651895  KJ624057 
Candida albicans  HC03INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651896  KJ624058 
Candida albicans  HC04INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651897  KJ624059 
Candida albicans  HC05INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651898  KJ624060 
Candida albicans  HC06INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651899  KJ624061 
Candida albicans  HC07INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651900  KJ624062 
Candida albicans  HC08INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651901  KJ624063 
Candida albicans  HC09INC  Cervicovaginal contents  Brazil  KJ651902  KJ624064 

(–) data not provided; HC: clinical hospital/UFPR; C: colonized; IC: complicated infection; INC: non-complicated infection.

Casuistry

The study enrolled women, who were aged between 18 and 56 years, with or without VVC clinical symptoms, and who had not been administered any drug treatment in the last six months before collection of the samples. The patients were divided into two groups: colonized patients (without clinical symptoms) and infected patients.1 The infected patients presented three or more of the following clinical symptoms: typical discharge, vaginal itching, vulvovaginal burning, dysuria and dyspareunia. Infected patient group was sub-divided into two sub-groups: (i) complicated – which included women with a history of recurrence infection; and (ii) uncomplicated – patients with sporadic episodes of the infection. The exclusion criteria were age (under 18 and over 56), pregnancy and women with immunosuppressive diseases and under treatment.

Collection, isolation and phenotypic identification

The samples were collected by swabs, and each sample was sowed on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium followed by incubation at ±30°C for a period of 48–120h as per the growth parameters of each isolate. A presumptive identification of isolates was done by CHROMagar at 37°C for 48h.16 Some of the isolates were identified by the API 20 AUX system (BioMérieux, France).

Molecular characterization of Candida isolates

DNA from the isolates was extracted by physical maceration of the samples in a mixture of silica/celite (2:1) in CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide). The isolated DNA was precipitated by CIA (acidic solution of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol) followed by sequencing on ABI3500 sequencer.17 For ITS sequencing, the following primers were used: ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and the reaction conditions of sequencing were as follows18: one cycle at 94°C for 2min, followed by 30 cycles at (94°C for 30s, 56°C for 1min, 72°C for 1min) and a final extension at 72°C for 3min.17 For amplification of D1/D2 region, the primers NL-1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and NL-4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) were used following the same reaction conditions, as listed above.19

For ABC genotyping of C. albicans, the primers CA-int-L (5′-ATAAGGGAAGTCGGCAAAATAGATCCGTAA-3′) and CA-int-R (5′-CCTTGGCTGTGGTTTCGCTAGATAGTAGAT-3′) were used.20 The genotyping was based on the presence or absence of a DNA insert, which codes for the ribosomal 26S RNA, dividing C. albicans in four groups20: A (C. albicans – 450bp), B (C. albicans – 840bp), C (C. stellatoidea – 840bp) and D (C. dubliniensis – 1080bp).

Alignment and phylogenetic construction

The obtained sequences were edited using the Staden program version 1.6, and were compared by the BLAST program for detection of the similarities using reference sequences available in the data bank (NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).21,22 The Mafft program (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) was used for the alignment; and visual inspection was done by MEGA 5.1 version.23 Forty sequences of Candida isolates were submitted for phylogenetic analysis using Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain U40085 as outgroup.20 The Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree was built with 100 bootstraps, based on the evolutionary model Tamura-3 parameters with using 5.1 version of the MEGA software for final editing.23

In vitro susceptibility tests

The in vitro susceptibility tests were done by micro-dilution method of broth, as per the Norm M27-A3 recommendations provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.24 The antifungals used were amphotericin B (Sigma–Aldrich 110 Química, Madrid, Spain), ketoconazole (Pharma Nostra, Brazil), itraconazole (Fragon), fluconazole (Pfizer, Madrid, Spain) and nystatin (Pharma Nostra, Brazil). The samples were diluted in RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium)-1640 medium (Sigma) and incubated at 37°C for 48h. According to the CLSI criteria, the sensitivity profile is classified as sensitive, dose-dependent sensitivity and resistant.

Results

A total of 40 isolates were obtained from 133 cervicovaginal samples, which were previously identified by CHROMagar and API 20AUX systems. On the basis of ITS and D1/D2 sequences, the isolates could be attributed to the genera Candida and Saccharomyces (Table 1). Among the isolates studied, 20 belonged to the colonized group, 11 were from the complicated infection group and 9 were from the uncomplicated infection group.

A tree was constructed using maximum likelihood analysis and the evolutionary model Kimura 2-parameter with 100 bootstraps. A total of 1959 sites were evaluated, of which, 786 were conserved sites, 1092 were variable sites, 712 sites provided parsimonious information (pi), and 361 were unique sites. The empirical basis frequencies were pi (A): 0.225836 pi (C): 0.283009 pi (G): 0.238533, pi (t) 0.252622. The phylogenetic tree was generated by using 18 strains as references, which included various types of strains of Candida species, Kluyveromyces marxianus, K. lactis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Torulaspora delbrueckii, keeping Schizosaccharomyces pombe as an outgroup.

The evaluated VVC isolates were identified to be C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and C. glabrata and were found to be distributed into six clades supported by bootstrap values (Fig. 1). The phylogenetic data corroborated with the biochemical data, except for the HC03IC isolate that was identified as C. albicans by the API 20AUX system, but as C. dubliniensis by the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

The phylogenetic tree of maximum likelihood based on the alignment of the entire region of its1/its2 and D1/D2 was built using 100 bootstrap, using the evolutionary model Tamura-3 parameters with program Mega version 5.1. Schizosaccharomyces pombe was used as an outgroup. The tree showed 6 clades (Albicans; Dubliniensis; Guilliermondii, Saccharomyces; Kefyr; Glabrata) diversified according to the isolated species. For a thorough understanding, the evaluated groups in this study are represented by colored squares for discernment: the brown square refers to the colonized group; one red square indicates isolates from the uncomplicated infection group; the two red squares represent the group with complicated infection.

(0.8MB).

According to the tree, most of the analyzed clinical isolates were identified to be C. albicans, with 33 isolates clustered in Albicans clade (bs, 100%). Analysis revealed that C. albicans isolates could not be separated according to the studied groups, i.e., colonized, complicated, and uncomplicated infection groups. In Guilliermondii clade (bs, 99%), the clinical isolate (HC08C) and P. guilliermondii (NRRL Y-2075) type strain were grouped. The isolate (HC02C) from the colonized group and Saccharomyces cerevisiae type were clustered in Saccharomyces clade (bs, 100%). Kefyr clade consisted of Kluyveromyces marxianus (NRRL Y-8281), Candida kefyr teleomorph strain CBS 712, K. marxianus var. Kluyveromyces lactis strain NRRL Y-8279 and HC09C isolate of C. kefyr. Three isolates were classified into the Glabrata clade (HC01C, HC07C and HC10C), belonging to the colonized group and C. glabrata type (5478) with 100% bootstrap.

Based on the molecular data, amidst the 40 isolates that were obtained from vaginal samples, the most prevalent species was C. albicans (82.5%), followed by C. glabrata (7.5%), C. guilliermondii (2.5%), C. kefyr (2.5%), C. dubliniensis (2.5%) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2.5%). Among the colonized group alone, a total of 20 isolates belonging to five different species C. albicans (60%), C. glabrata (25%), C. guilliermondii (5%), C. kefyr (5%) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (5%) were identified. A total of 9 isolates obtained from the uncomplicated infection group were C. albicans (100%). In the complicated infection group, 11 isolates were from two different Candida species: C. dubliniensis (9.1%) and C albicans (90.9%).

Regarding the ABC genotyping of C. albicans, at least two different genotypes (A and B) were observed, although 25 isolates belonged to type A and 7 isolates to type B, it was not possible to establish a correlation amidst the genotypes identified and the susceptibility profile of the tested drugs (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Agarose electrophoresis ABC genotyping of the C. albicans from the different studied groups, genotype A (C. albicans – 450bp) and B (C. albicans – 840bp). The lanes 2–14 correspond to the colonized group; 15–23 to the uncomplicated infection group and 24–33 to the complicated infection group. Lane 34 represents a blank; the lanes 1 and 35 indicate standard 1kb molecular weight markers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Ca, USA).

(0.23MB).

The susceptibility testing results of the studied isolates from different patient groups are summarized in Table 2. In the colonized group (I), all isolates of C. albicans (n=14) showed a dose-dependent sensitivity (SDD) to nystatin (8.0μg/mL) and sensitivity (S) to itraconazole (0.0625μg/mL), fluconazole (0.125μg/mL), amphotericin B (0.03–1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL). Three C. glabrata isolates (HC01C, HC02C and HC07C) were resistant (R) to itraconazole (4.0μg/mL), SDD for the fluconazole (4.0–16μg/mL), nystatin (8.0μg/mL) and sensitive to amphotericin B (0.03–1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (1.0–4.0μg/mL). The isolate of C. guilliermondii (HC16C) showed SDD to nystatin (8.0μg/mL), resistance to amphotericin B (2.0μg/mL), sensitivity to itraconazole (0.0625μg/mL), fluconazole (0.125μg/mL), and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL). C. kefyr (HC09C) presented SDD to itraconazole (0.25), nystatin (4.0μg/mL), and sensitivity for fluconazole (0.25μg/mL), amphotericin B (1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL). Furthermore, S. cerevisiae isolate (HC02C) was SDD to nystatin (8.0μg/mL) and sensitive to itraconazole (0.0625μg/mL), fluconazole (0.125μg/mL), amphotericin B (0.03–1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL).

Table 2.

Variations in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antifungals for the different study groups.

Isolate species  Total of samples  Itraconazole  Fluconazole  Nystatin  Amphotericin B  Ketoconazole 
C. albicans (I)  14  0.0625–0.0625  0.125–0.125  8.0–8.0 (SDD=14)  0.03–1.0  0.0625–0.0625 
C. albicans (II)  10  0.0625–0.25 (SDD=1)  0.125–2.0  ≥64 (R=10)  0.5–1.0  0.0625–0.25 
C. albicans (III)  09  0.125–0.125  0.125–0.125  8.0–8.0 (SDD=9)  1.0–1.0  0.0625–0.0625 
C. glabrata (I)  03  2.0–4.0 (R=3)  4.0–16.0 (SDD=1)  8.0–8.0 (SDD=3)  0.03–1.0  1.0–4.0 
C. guillermondii (I)  01  0.0625–0.0625  0.125–8.0  8.0 (SDD=1)  0.25–2.0 (R=1)  0.0625–2.5 
C. Kefyr (I)  01  0.25 (SDD=1)  0.25  4.0 (SDD=1)  1.0  0.0625 
S. cerevisiae (I)  01  0.0625–0.0625  0.125–0.125  8.0–8.0 (SDD=1)  0.03–1.0  0.0625–0.0625 
C. dubliniensis (II)  01  0.0625–0.0625  0.125–2.0  ≥ 64 (R=1)  0.5–1.0  0.0625–0.25 

SDD: sensitivity dose dependent; R: resistant; S: sensitivity; I: colonized group; II: complicated infection group; III: uncomplicated group.

In the complicated infection group (II), one strain of C. albicans isolate (HC01IC) was found to be SDD to itraconazole (0.0625–0.25μg/mL); all isolates (n=10) were resistant to nystatin (≥64μg/mL) and sensitive to fluconazole (0.125–2.0μg/mL), amphotericin B (1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL). C. dubliniensis isolate (HC03IC) was resistant to nystatin (≥64μg/mL) and presented sensitivity toward the itraconazole (0.0625μg/mL), fluconazole (0.125–2.0μg/mL), amphotericin B (0.5–1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL). Finally, in the uncomplicated infections group (III), all the isolates (n=9) of C. albicans were SDD to nystatin (8.0μg/mL) and sensitive toward itraconazole (0.0625μg/ml), fluconazole (0.125–2.0μg/mL), amphotericin B (0.5–1.0μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.0625μg/mL).

Discussion

Identification of Candida species that causes VVC is highly desirable in microbiological practice, as it may help in clarifying the prevalence and incidence of species that affects the susceptible population. Moreover, determination of susceptibility of Candida to the antifungal drugs may be crucial in context of the recurrent clinical forms of VVC. Several studies have demonstrated the occurrence of vulvovaginitis due to Candida species, indicating heterogeneity among isolates from different geographical regions. In the present study, the prevalent species were3,25–27C. albicans, followed by C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr, C. dubliniensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, thereby suggesting an increase of infection by non-albicans Candida. An increase in infections that are caused by non-albicans Candida has been registered, although C. albicans is still the most isolated species in VVC clinical cases.13,28–31 Furthermore, the cultural and ethnic differences may also influence the isolation rate of yeast from vulvovaginitis samples.32,33 The lack of data on epidemiology and genetic variability reinforces the importance of epidemiological studies by molecular methods.6,27,34–36

The colonized group investigated in the current study presented a wide diversity of species such as C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In addition, C. albicans was found to be prevalent (n=19) in the infection group and C. dubliniensis (n=1) isolates were observed only in the complicated infection group (Table 2). The microbiota species found in colonized women are the same as reported in VVC.1,4,27,30,35 Vaginitis caused by S. cerevisiae is rare and it has been isolated from an asymptomatic patient.37,38 This corroborates with the findings of the present study.

The VVC Candida albicans isolates, analyzed by us, were clustered into a single clade, indicating a monophyletic group (Fig. 1), which is in concordance with the data already reported by several authors.31,39 The strain, identified as C. albicans (HC03IC) by biochemical test, proved to be C. dubliniensis according to the phylogenetic analysis. A lack of correlation between the phenotypic and molecular identification of the samples can be justified by the limitations of the commercial identification system, which do not allow distinguishing the yeast species, which have minor phenotypic differences.40,41 Therefore, multilocus analyses are needed in order to identify Candida species.31 In the ABC genotyping, two different genotypes among C. albicans isolates were detected. The genotype A was observed in 75.7% of the isolates, and the isolates of genotype B were present in all the analyzed groups. However, it had a higher occurrence in the uncomplicated infected group (Fig. 2). It has been reported that the candidiasis that is caused by C. albicans of genotype B has a higher tendency for persistent infections, though further studies with larger populations for a better assessment are required.36

In the current analysis, all the C. albicans isolates from the complicated group, regardless of genotype, were resistant to nystatin and susceptible to other tested antifungals, except for the isolate HC04IC that showed SDD to fluconazole. In the uncomplicated infections group, the isolates of C. albicans were SDD to nystatin and susceptible to other tested antifungals. The same was observed in the isolates from the group of colonized patients. Concerning the non-albicans Candida species, the isolate of C. dubliniensis was resistant only to nystatin, the C. glabrata isolates were resistant to itraconazole and SDD to fluconazole and nystatin. These results contrast from the previous reports that regarded C. glabrata isolates as resistant and SDD to fluconazole.42 Besides, C. kefyr strain presented SDD to itraconazole and nystatin, and a similar susceptibility profile was previously reported.10 In other studies, similar results were obtained, reporting that VVC species strains of genus Candida presented resistance and also a high frequency of SDD for nystatin and sensitivity to others tested drugs.26,35,43

The isolate of C. guilliermondii showed SDD to nystatin and resistance to amphotericin B. According to the literature, the treatment is problematical due to a low sensitivity for some antifungal classes, especially for fluconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B; and VVC infections caused by C. guilliermondii are rare.2 Furthermore, we obtained an isolate of S. cerevisiae SDD to nystatin, which differed from the data previously reported for this species, which demonstrated that S. cerevisiae isolates were resistant to fluconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole.44

There are several factors that can influence the clinical response to treatment of VVC, as evident from different reports showing variation in the in vitro susceptibility and in vivo response to the drug.39,45 Through in vitro susceptibility testing, it was observed that all the isolates were sensitive to ketoconazole, although fluconazole remains the drug of choice for VVC treatment. Such results indicate that the susceptibility profile for the isolates may not be a factor related to the recurrence of the disease. Therefore, it may be concluded that the molecular analysis provides accurate identification of Candida species isolated from patients with VVC. Hence, our findings demonstrated the importance of molecular tools for identification of the isolates and also to elucidate the epidemiology of VVC.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the staff of the Diagnostic Unit of Clinical Hospital and the Microbiology and Molecular Biology laboratory at UFPR for their technical assistance and the financial support provided by the Brazilian Federal Agencies: CAPES (Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate), CNPq (National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development) and the Parana's state agency Fundação Araucaria.

References
[1]
J.D. Sobel.
Vulvovaginal candidosis.
Lancet, 369 (2007), pp. 1961-1971
[2]
L.S. Barbedo, D.B.G. Sgarbi.
Candidiasis.
DST J Bras Doenças Sex Transm, 22 (2010), pp. 22-38
[3]
M.I. Rosa, D. Rumel.
Fatores associados à candidíase vulvovaginal: estudo exploratório.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 26 (2004), pp. 65-70
[4]
R.A.D.M. Mahmoudi, S. Zafarghandi, B. Abbasabadi, M. Tavallaee.
The epidemiology of Candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis in an Iranian patient population.
Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol, 155 (2010), pp. 199-203
[5]
F.C. Odds, R. Bernaerts.
CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species.
J Clin Microbiol, l32 (1994), pp. 1923-1929
[6]
P.R. Corrêa, P.R.S. David, N.P. Peres, K.C. Cunha, M.T.G. Almeida.
Caracterização fenotípica de leveduras isoladas da mucosa vaginal em mulheres adultas.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 31 (2009), pp. 177-181
[7]
D.C.A.F. Gondo, M.T.C. Duarte, M.G. Silva, C.M.G.L. Parada.
Abnormal vaginal flora in low-risk pregnant women cared for by a public health service: prevalence and association with symptoms and findings from gynecological exams.
Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem, 18 (2010), pp. 919-927
[8]
L.C. Galle, M.J.S.M. Gianinni.
Prevalência e susceptibilidade de leveduras vaginais.
JBPML, 40 (2004), pp. 229-236
[9]
Z.G. Barrenetxea.
Vulvovaginitis candidiásica.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 19 (2002), pp. 22-24
[10]
M. Sanguinetti, B. Posteraro, B. Fiori, S. Ranno, R. Torelli, G. Fadda.
Mechanisms of azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida glabrata collected during a hospital survey of antifungal resistance.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 49 (2005), pp. 668-679
[11]
S.R. Lockhart, S.A. Messer, M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema.
Geographic distribution and antifugal susceptibility of the newly described species Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis in Comparison to the closely related species Candida parapsilosis.
JCM, 46 (2008), pp. 2659-2664
[12]
D.W. Williams, M.J. Wilson, M.A.O. Lewis, A.J.C. Potts.
Identification of Candida species by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of intergenic spacer regions of ribosomal DNA.
JCM, 33 (1995), pp. 2476-2479
[13]
J.M. Achkar, B.C. Fries.
Candida infections of the genitourinary tract.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 23 (2010), pp. 253-273
[14]
E. Monroy-Perez, T. Sainz-Espunes, G. Paniagua-Contreras, E. Negrete-Abascal, J.R. Rodriguez-Moctezuma, S. Vaca.
Frequency and expression of ALS and HWP1 genotypes in Candida albicans strains isolated from Mexican patients suffering from vaginal candidosis.
Mycoses, 55 (2012), pp. 151-157
[15]
D. Dalazen, D. Zanrosso, L. Wanderley, N.L. Silva, A.M. Fuentefria.
Comparação do perfil de suscetibilidade entre isolados clínicos de Candida spp. orais e vulvovaginais no Sul do Brasil.
JBPML, 47 (2011), pp. 33-38
[16]
C. Eckert, B. Burghoffer, V. Lalande, F. Barbuta.
Evaluation of the chromogenic agar chromID C. difficile.
J Clin Microbiol, l51 (2013), pp. 1002-1004
[17]
V.A. Vicente, D. Attili-Angelis, M.R. Pie, et al.
Environmental isolation of black yeast-like fungi involved in human infection.
Stud Mycol, (2008), pp. 137-144
[18]
T.J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, J. Taylor.
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics.
PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, pp. 315-322
[19]
K. O’Donnell.
Fusarium and its near relatives.
The Fungal Holomorph: Mitotic, Meiotic and Pleomorphic Speciation in Fungal Systematics, pp. 225-233
[20]
M.J. Mccullough, K.V. Clemons, D.A. Stevens.
Molecular and phenotypic characterization of genotypic Candida albicans subgroups and comparison with Candida dubliniensis and Candida stellatoidea.
J Clin Microbiol, l37 (1999), pp. 417-421
[21]
Bonfield J., Beal K., Jordan M., Chen Y., Staden R. The Staden Package Manual, Cambridge, UK; 2006.
[22]
S.F. Altschul, T.L. Madden, A.A. Schaffer, et al.
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.
Nucleic Acids Res, 25 (1997), pp. 3389-3402
[23]
K. Tamura, J. Dudley, M. Nei, S. Kumar.
Mega 4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.
Mol Biol Evol, 24 (2006), pp. 1596-1599
[24]
Clinical, Laboratory Standards Institute.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, (2012), pp. 56238-56667
[25]
A. Spinilo, E. Capuzzo, S. Acciano, A. Santolo, F. Zara.
Effect of antibiotic use on the prevalence of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180 (1999), pp. 14-17
[26]
M.E. Lopes-Consolaro, A.T. Albertoni, C. Shizue-Yoshida, R.M. Peralta, T.I. Estivalet-Svidzinski.
Correlation of Candida species and symptoms among patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Maringa, Parana, Brazil.
Rev Iberoam Micol, 21 (2004), pp. 202-205
[27]
S. Asticcioli, L. Sacco, R. Daturi, et al.
Trends in frequency and in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida isolates from women attending the STD outpatients clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Northern Italy during the years 2002–2007.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 31 (2009), pp. 199-204
[28]
L.M. Linhares, S.S. Witkin, S.D. Miranda, A.M. Fonseca, J.A. Pinotti, W.J. Ledger.
Differentiation between women with vulvovaginal symptoms who are positive or negative for Candida species by culture.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol, l9 (2001), pp. 221-225
[29]
C.G. Taverna, M.E. Bosco-Borgeat, A.O. Murisengo, et al.
Comparative analyses of classical phenotypic method and ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for identification of medically relevant Candida species.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 108 (2013), pp. 178-185
[30]
A.B. Guzel, M. Jjkit, T. Akar, R. Burgut, C. Demir.
Evaluation of risk factors in patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis and the value of chromID Candida agar versus CHROMagar Candida for recovery and presumptive identification of vaginal yeast species.
Med Mycol, l49 (2007), pp. 16-25
[31]
K.M.T. Clement, M.D. Heide, R. Vincent, M. Wieland.
Re-examining the phylogeny of clinically relevant Candida species and allied genera based on multigene analyses.
FEMS Yeast Res, 8 (2008), pp. 651-659
[32]
A. Paulitsch, W. Weger, G. Ginter-Hanselmayer, E. Marth, W. Buzina.
A 5-year (2000–2004) epidemiological survey of Candida and non-Candida yeast species causing vulvovaginal candidiasis in Graz, Austria.
[33]
Y. Wei, J. Feng, C. Luo.
Isolation and genotyping of vaginal non-albicans in women from two different ethnic groups in Lanzhou, China.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 110 (2010), pp. 227-230
[34]
A.S. Chau, C.A. Mendrick, F.J. Sabatelli, D. Loebenberg, P.M. Mcnicholas.
Application of real-time quantitative PCR to molecular analysis of Candida albicans strains exhibiting reduced susceptibility to azoles.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48 (2004), pp. 2124-2131
[35]
M.H.S.H. Ferrazza, M.L. Maluf, M.E.L. Consolaro, C.S. Shinobu, T.I.E. Svidzinski, M.R. Batista.
Caracterização de leveduras isoladas da vagina e sua associação com candidíase vulvovaginal em duas cidades do sul do Brasil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 27 (2005), pp. 58-63
[36]
G.M. Chaves, F.P. Santos, A.L. Colombo.
The persistence of multifocal colonization by a single ABC genotype of Candida albicans may predict the transition from commensalism to infection.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 107 (2012), pp. 198-204
[37]
M.J. Echeverría-Irigoyen, E. Eraso, J. Cano, M. Gomáriz, J. Guarro, G. Quindós.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae vaginitis: microbiology and in vitro antifungal susceptibility.
Mycopathologia, 172 (2011), pp. 201-205
[38]
R.A.F. Pádua, E. Guilhermetti, T.I.E. Svidzinski.
In vitro activity of antifungal agents on yeasts isolated from vaginal secretion.
Acta Sci Health Sci, 25 (2003), pp. 51-54
[39]
S. Diezmann, C.J. Cox, G. Schönian, R.J. Vilgalys, T.G. Mitchell.
Phylogeny and evolution of medical species of Candida and related taxa: a multigenic analysis.
J Clin Microbiol, l42 (2004), pp. 5624-5635
[40]
J. Florez, A.S. Mendez, J. Cano, J. Guarro, R.E. Perez, M.P. Arévalo.
Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Candida nivariensis sp. nov., a possible new opportunistic fungus.
J Clin Microbiol, 43 (2005), pp. 4107-4111
[41]
Vijgen SNYSS, R. Naesens, K. Magerman, A. Boel, R. Cartuyvels.
Comparison of Vitek identification and antifungal susceptibility testing methods to DNA sequencing and Sensitive Yeast One antifungal testing.
Med Mycol, 49 (2010), pp. 107-110
[42]
P.M. Oliveira, R.E. Mascarenhas, C. Lacroix, et al.
Candida species isolated from the vaginal mucosa of HIV-infected women in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Braz J Infect Dis, 15 (2011), pp. 239-244
[43]
A.A. Lattif.
Molecular typing and in vitro fluconazole susceptibility of Candida species isolated from diabetic and nondiabetic women with vulvovaginal candidiasis in India.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 44 (2011), pp. 166-171
[44]
V. Papaemmanoul, N. Georgogiannis, M. Plega, et al.
Prevalence and susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causing vaginitis in Greek women.
[45]
M.A. Pfaller, D.J. Diekema, D.J. Sheehan.
Interpretative breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida revisited: a blueprint for the future of antifungal susceptibility testing.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 19 (2006), pp. 435-447
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo