metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española Aspectos técnicos y resultados de la mastectomía profiláctica en pacientes co...
Información de la revista
Vol. 75. Núm. 3.
Páginas 123-128 (marzo 2004)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 75. Núm. 3.
Páginas 123-128 (marzo 2004)
Acceso a texto completo
Aspectos técnicos y resultados de la mastectomía profiláctica en pacientes con elevado riesgo de cáncer de mama
Technical features and results in 65 prophylactic mastectomies in patients at high risk of breast cancer
Visitas
10089
Antonio Güemesa,1
Autor para correspondencia
aguemes@unizar.es

Correspondencia: Servicio de Cirugía. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa. Avda. San Juan Bosco, 15. 50009 Zaragoza. España.
, Ramón Sousaa, Ana Navarroa, Pilar Val-Carreresa, Manuel Morosb, José M. Sainzc, José I. Mayordomod, Raquel Andrésd, Eduardo Polod, Ignacio Álvarezd, Ricardo Lozanoa
a Servicio de Cirugía. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa. Zaragoza.
b Servicio de Anatomía Patológica. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa. Zaragoza.
c Servicio de Radiología. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa. Zaragoza.
d Servicio de Oncología. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa. Zaragoza. España.
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Resumen
Objetivo

Analizar la técnica quirúrgica y los hallazgos histopatológicos en una serie de pacientes a los que se practicó una mastectomía profiláctica.

Pacientes y métodos

Se estudió retrospectivamente a 65 mujeres con un riesgo elevado de cáncer de mama a las que se practicó una mastectomía profiláctica uni o bilateral, seguida de reconstrucción. Las pacientes fueron intervenidas por el mismo equipo quirúrgico y el mismo anatomopatólogo analizó las piezas extirpadas. La técnica quirúrgica consistió en una mastectomía con conservación de la piel y reconstrucción con prótesis o en una mastectomía simple, seguida de reconstrucción con colgajo del gran dorsal.

Resultados

Se intervino (1996-2001) a 65 pacientes con un elevado riesgo de cáncer mamario (56 mastectomías bilaterales y 9 unilaterales). El 58% de las pacientes presentó lesiones preneoplásicas en las piezas extirpadas.

Conclusiones

La mastectomía profiláctica debe ser una opción para la población con un elevado riesgo de cáncer mamario. La mastectomía con conservación de piel supone una agresión quirúrgica menor y permite una reconstrucción durante la intervención. El hallazgo de un gran número de lesiones, consideradas de riesgo, en las piezas extirpadas puede favorecer el concepto de cirugía profiláctica.

Palabras Clave:
Cáncer de mama
Mastectomía profiláctica
BRCA1
BRCA2
Alto riesgo
Objective

To analyze surgical technique and histopathological findings in a series of patients who underwent prophylactic mastectomy.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective study of 65 patients at high risk of breast cancer who underwent uni-or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction. Surgery was performed by the same surgical team and the surgical specimens were analyzed by the same pathologist. The surgical technique consisted of skin-sparing mastectomy with prosthesis or simple mastectomy followed by latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction.

Results

From 1996 to 2001, 65 women at high risk of breast cancer underwent surgery (56 bilateral and 9 unilateral mastectomies). Fifty-eight percent of the patients presented preneoplastic lesions in the surgical specimen.

Conclusions

Prophylactic mastectomy should be an option in women at high risk of breast cancer. Skin-sparing mastectomy is a less aggressive technique and allows immediate reconstruction. The finding of a large number of precancerous lesions in the surgical specimens supports the concept of prophylactic surgery.

Key Words:
Breast cancer
Prophylactic mastectomy
BRCA-1,2
High risk
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
World Health Organization Annex. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems.
WHO, (2000),
[2.]
F. Berrino, R. Capoccia, J. Esteve, et al.
Survival of cancer patients in Europe: The Eurocare 2 Study.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, (1999),
[3.]
A.J. Sasco.
Epidemiology of breast cancer: an environmental disease? APMIS Suplementum, 109 (2001), pp. 80-92
[4.]
D.M. Parkin, S.L. Whelan, J. Ferlay, et al.
Cancer incidence in five continents.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, (1997),
[5.]
C.M. Magnusson, I.R. Persson, J.A. Baron, et al.
The role of reproductive factors and use of oral contraceptives in the aetiology of breast cancer in women aged 50 to 74 years.
Int J Cancer, 80 (1999), pp. 231-236
[6.]
M.S. Goldberg, F. Labreche.
Occupational risk factors for female breast cancer.
Occup Environ Med, 53 (1996), pp. 145-156
[7.]
D. Ford, D.F. Easton.
The genetics of breast and ovarian cancer.
Br J Cancer, 72 (1995), pp. 805-812
[8.]
J.M. Hall, M.K. Lee, J. Morrow, et al.
Linkage analysis of early onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21.
Science, 250 (1990), pp. 1684-1689
[9.]
E. Warner, D.B. Plewes, R.S. Shumak, et al.
Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol, 19 (2001), pp. 3524-3531
[10.]
W. Burke, M. Daly, J. Garber, et al.
Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer: II. BRCA1 and BRCA2.
JAMA, 277 (1997), pp. 997-1003
[11.]
M.M. Bilimoria, M. Morrow.
The woman at increased risk for breast cancer: evaluation and management strategies.
CA Cancer J Clin, 45 (1995), pp. 263-278
[12.]
Society of Surgical Oncology. SSO develops position statement on prophylactic mastectomies.
SSO News, 1 (1993), pp. 10-14
[13.]
A. Güemes, R. Sousa, J.C. Salinas, et al.
Prophylactic mastectomy for patients at high risk of breast carcinoma..
Proceedings Eurosurgery 2000, pp. 197-202
[14.]
M.J. Lopez, K.A. Porter.
The current role of prophylactic mastectomy.
Surg Clin N Am, 76 (1996), pp. 231-243
[15.]
J.A. O’Shaughhnessy.
Chemoprevention of breast cancer.
JAMA, 275 (1996), pp. 1349-1353
[16.]
F. Eisinger, G. Geller, W. Burke, et al.
Cultural basis for differences between US and French clinical recommendations for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Lancet, 353 (1999), pp. 919-920
[17.]
T.S. Frank, A.M. Deffenbaugh, J.E. Reid, et al.
Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10000 individuals.
J Clin Oncol, 20 (2002), pp. 1480-1490
[18.]
A. Osorio, A. Barroso, B. Martínez, et al.
Molecular analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 32 breast and/or ovarian cancer spanish families.
Br J Cancer, 82 (2000), pp. 1266-1270
[19.]
A.C. Antoniou, P.D. Pharoah, G. McMullan, et al.
A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes.
Br J Cancer, 86 (2002), pp. 76-83
[20.]
W.F. Lawrence, B.N. Peshkin, W. Liang, et al.
Cost of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility mutations.
Cancer Prev Biomarkers Prev, 5 (2001), pp. 475-481
[21.]
L.C. Hartmann, D.J. Schaid, J.E. Woods, et al.
Efficacy of bilateral mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer.
N Engl J Med, 340 (1999), pp. 77-84
[22.]
H. Meijers-Heijboer, B. Van Geel, W. Van Putten, et al.
Breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
N Engl J Med, 354 (2001), pp. 159-164
[23.]
L.C. Hartmann, D. Schaid, T. Sellers, et al.
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1-2 mutation carriers [abstrac].
Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 41 (2000), pp. 222
[24.]
E.A. Peralta, J.D. Ellenhorn, L.D. Wagman, et al.
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer.
Am J Surg, 180 (2000), pp. 439-445
[25.]
P.K. Buehler.
Patient selection for prophylactic mastectomy: Who is at high risk? Plast Reconstr Surg, 72 (1983), pp. 324-327
[26.]
W.D. Dupont, F.F. Parl, W.H. Hartmann, et al.
Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia.
Cancer, 71 (1993), pp. 1258-1265
[27.]
D. Ford, D.F. Easton, D.T. Bishop, et al.
Risk of cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Lancet, 343 (1994), pp. 692-695
[28.]
M.L. Slattery, R.A. Kerber.
A comprehensive evaluation of family history and breast cancer risk.
JAMA, 270 (1993), pp. 1563-1568
[29.]
E. Funkhauser, J.W. Waterbor, P. Cole.
Mammographic patterns and breast cancer risk factors among women having elective screening.
South Med J, 86 (1993), pp. 177-180
[30.]
J. Russo, I.H. Russo.
Cellular basis of breasy cancer susceptibility.
Oncol Res, 11 (1999), pp. 169-178
[31.]
B. Turner, E. Harrold, E. Matloff, et al.
BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in clically recurrent breast cancer patients after lumpectomy and radiation therapy: implications for breast-conserving management in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations.
J Clin Oncol, 17 (1999), pp. 3017-3024
[32.]
L.N. Lodder, P.G. Frets, R.W. Trijsburg, et al.
One year follow-up of women opting for presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: emotional impact of the test outcome and decisions on risk management (surveillance or prophylactic surgery.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 73 (2002), pp. 97-112
[33.]
K.K. Khurana, A. Loosmann, P.J. Numann, et al.
Prophylactic mastectomy: pathologic findings in high-risk patients.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 124 (2000), pp. 378-381
Copyright © 2004. Elsevier España, S.L.. Todos los derechos reservados
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos