metricas
covid
Buscar en
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
Toda la web
Inicio Cirugía Española (English Edition) Repair of Large Abdominal Wall Defects by Epiploplasty and Polypropelene Mesh in...
Información de la revista
Vol. 93. Núm. 3.
Páginas 204-206 (marzo 2015)
Visitas
5890
Vol. 93. Núm. 3.
Páginas 204-206 (marzo 2015)
Scientific letter
Acceso a texto completo
Repair of Large Abdominal Wall Defects by Epiploplasty and Polypropelene Mesh in Patients With Decompressive Laparostomies
Cierre de grandes defectos de pared abdominal mediante plastia de epiplón y malla de polipropileno sustitutoria en pacientes con laparostomías descompresivas
Visitas
5890
Emilio Muñoz Muñoz, Fernando Pardo Aranda
Autor para correspondencia
fparanda@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Judith Camps Lasa, Xavier Rodriguez Alsina, Enrique Veloso Veloso
Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Texto completo

When primary abdominal wall closure has not been possible or after open abdominal decompression, the definitive abdominal wall closure can pose surgical problems that are difficult to resolve. Full-thickness abdominal wall defects caused by musculoaponeurotic and skin retraction, whose dimensions impede primary closure after a few days of maintaining an open abdomen open, make it necessary to search for different reconstructive strategies.1–3

We present the case of 3 patients with large full-thickness abdominal wall defects secondary to open abdominal decompression due to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Definitive closure involved omentoplasty in order to isolate the abdominal viscera, reinforced with polypropylene (PP) mesh anchored on the oblique muscles retracted to the supra-aponeurotic position. In some cases, treatment included a partial skin graft.

Patient 1

The patient is a 79-year-old male with a history of obesity and cholangitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. He presented diffuse peritonitis secondary to a bile leak 48h later. Laparotomy was indicated; the cystic duct was sutured and peritoneal lavage performed. During the postoperative period in the intensive care unit (ICU), the patient developed ACS that was refractory to medical treatment, at which time open abdominal decompression was necessary. Afterwards, the patient showed progressive clinical improvement.

On the sixth postoperative day, abdominal wall reconstruction was performed. The full-thickness defect measured 20cm transversal (t) and 15cm longitudinal (l). A portion of the greater omentum was sutured to the musculoaponeurotic edge, which was reinforced with polypropylene mesh anchored on the retracted aponeurosis. During post-op, the patient required abdominal vacuum therapy for 5 weeks, and progressive mesh integration as well as wound granulation were obtained. Definitive reconstruction of the defect with a partial skin graft was suggested, but the patient preferred secondary intention with epithelialization, which was completed in 6 months. After 5 years of follow-up, he has presented no further complications.

Patient 2

The patient is a 67-year-old male with a history of morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. During the postoperative period after radical cystoprostatectomy, he presented prolonged paralytic ileus with abdominal distension and evisceration. The patient was treated with primary closure, after which he developed ACS that required open abdominal decompression (Fig. 1A). After hemodynamic and ventilatory recovery, the abdominal wall defect measuring 32 (t)×22cm (l) was closed using an omentoplasty that was reinforced with supra-aponeurotic polypropylene mesh (Fig. 1B). During post-op, vacuum therapy was initiated, which achieved mesh integration and wound granulation (Fig. 2A) after 6 weeks of treatment. Afterwards, a partial skin graft over the skin defect achieved epithelialization in 40 days (Fig. 2B). The patient has not presented any complications after 10 months of follow-up.

Fig. 1.

(A) Open abdominal decompression with a Bogota bag after abdominal compartment syndrome and (B) omentoplasty and substitutive supra-aponeurotic polypropylene mesh.

(0.16MB).
Fig. 2.

(A) Mesh integration and wound granulation after 6 weeks and (B) partial skin graft and epithelialization.

(0.16MB).
Patient 3

The patient is a 68-year-old male with a history of obesity, heart failure and chronic bronchitis, who was hospitalized due to intestinal obstruction secondary to bezoar impaction that required segmental intestinal resections with primary anastomosis. In the postoperative period, he presented respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support and corticosteroid treatment. Reoperation was necessary due to anastomotic dehiscence with diffuse peritonitis and evisceration; intra-abdominal hypertension syndrome was observed, which required the abdomen to be left open. Six days later, he was reoperated for abdominal closure of a complete abdominal wall defect measuring 22 (t)×15cm (l), which was reconstructed with omentoplasty and reinforced with polypropylene mesh as in the two previous cases. The patient's progress was satisfactory, and vacuum therapy was applied for 3 weeks. The patient is currently in the waiting list for a partial skin graft over the granulation tissue.

In our setting, the use of biomaterials for the repair of abdominal wall defects began at the end of the 1980s. Clinical experience shows evidence that polypropylene mesh has good tolerance to infection4 as well as to the formation of intestinal fistulas, whose incidence was significantly reduced when the omentum was interposed between the mesh and intestine.5

The greater omentum has well-known immunologic and angiogenic properties,6,7 and it is been shown to be useful for the repair of large abdominal defects.8 However, there are few references about its capacity for granulation through PP mesh exposed to the exterior. Sandwich techniques have been described (from the inside out: absorbable mesh, polypropylene mesh and omentum), with good results.9 The isolating property of the omentum prevents the creation of fistulas, and it has shown satisfactory results in abdominal wall closure thanks to its capacity to integrate the PP, even in infected areas.10

Due to the dimensions of the wall defects, the PP mesh was left exposed, although this was not a problem for its integration and granulation. This may have been favored by the use of vacuum therapy.

Even though only one of the cases has a long follow-up (5 years), our limited experience leads us to conclude that the treatment of large full-thickness abdominal wall defects using this technique is a procedure to be considered in situations similar to those we have presented.

Funding

The authors declare that they have received no funding for the preparation of this manuscript, and it has not been presented at congresses or other publications.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References
[1]
T.R. Howdieshell, C.D. Proctor, E. Stemberg, J.I. Cué, J.S. Mondy, M.L. Hawkins.
Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen.
Am J Surg, 188 (2004), pp. 301-306
[2]
M. Kääriäinen, H. Kuokkanen.
Primary closure of the abdominal wall after “open abdomen” situation.
Scand J Surg, 102 (2013), pp. 20-24
[3]
A. Leppäniemi, E. Tukiainen.
Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects.
Scand J Surg, 102 (2013), pp. 14-19
[4]
J.W. Jones, G.J. Jurkovich.
Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds.
Am Surg, 55 (1989), pp. 73-76
[5]
C.P. Brandt, C.R. McHernry, D.G. Jacobs, J.J. Piotrowski, P.P. Priebe.
Polypropylene mesh closure after emergency laparotomy: morbidity and outcome.
Surgery, 118 (1995), pp. 736-741
[6]
D. Lieebermann-Meffert.
The greater omentum: anatomy, embryology, and surgical applications.
Surg Clin North Am, 80 (2000), pp. 275-293
[7]
C. Platell, D. Cooper, J.M. Papadomitriou, J.C. Hall.
The omentum.
World J Gastroenterol, 6 (2000), pp. 169-176
[8]
C.S. Hultman, G.W. Carlson, A. Losken, G. Jones, J. Culbertson, G. Mackay, et al.
Utility of the great omentum in the reconstruction of complex extraperitoneal wounds and defects.
Ann Surg, 235 (2002), pp. 782-795
[9]
N. El-Muttardi, K. Lancaster, R. Ng, D. Mercer.
The sandwich omental flap for abdominal wall defect reconstruction.
Br J Plast Surg, 58 (2005), pp. 841-844
[10]
R.P. Bleichrodt, A.W. Malyar, T.S. de Vries Reilingh, O. Buyne, J.J. Bonenkamp, H. van Goor.
The omentum-polypropylene sandwich technique: an attractive method to repair large abdominal-wall defects in the presence of contamination or infection.

Please cite this article as: Muñoz Muñoz E, Pardo Aranda F, Camps Lasa J, Rodriguez Alsina X, Veloso Veloso E. Cierre de grandes defectos de pared abdominal mediante plastia de epiplón y malla de polipropileno sustitutoria en pacientes con laparostomías descompresivas. Cir Esp. 2015;93:204–206.

Copyright © 2013. AEC
Descargar PDF
Opciones de artículo
es en pt

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

Você é um profissional de saúde habilitado a prescrever ou dispensar medicamentos